Search

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is one of the key oncogenic mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer with adenocarcinoma histology. Exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R substitutions account for 90%, while EGFR exon 20 insertions constitute 4–10% of EGFR mutations and are the third most prevalent activating EGFR mutations. EGFR exon 20 insertions are associated with decreased sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and, until recently, effective targeted therapy against these tumours remained an unmet clinical need and chemotherapy was the only treatment of choice available. The approval of amivantamab and mobocertinib for patients who have progressed after chemotherapy represents an important step forward in the management of these patients. Here in this review, we summarize the epidemiology, structure and the tumour microenvironment of EGFR exon 20 insertion and also review the systemic treatments, including targeted therapies and ongoing clinical trials in EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, as well as detection methods for EGFR exon 20 insertion. Lastly, resistant mechanisms and future directions are addressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The clinical utility of plasma tumor mutational burden (pTMB) requires further validation. Herein, the pTMB and genetic alterations were investigated as predictive biomarkers for anti-PD-1 monotherapy outcome in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: The GuardantOMNI panel (Guardant Health) was used to identify pTMB and genetic alterations. Data from 99 patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab or nivolumab in first-, second-, or third-line settings between June 2016 and December 2020 were collected. Associations between pTMB and clinical benefit rate (CBR, stable disease ⩾6 months or partial response), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results: Median pTMB in 84 patients was 10.8 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb). Histological analyses revealed that 61 and 36% of the patients had adenocarcinomas and squamous NSCLC, respectively. Most patients were treated with nivolumab (74%) and most anti-PD-1 agents were administered as second-line treatment (70%). The median follow-up duration was of 10.9 months (range, 0.2–40.7). Patients with high pTMB (⩾19 mut/Mb) had a higher CBR (69%) compared with low pTMB patients (33%; p = 0.01). ARID1A (p = 0.007) and either ERBB2 or KIT mutations (p = 0.012) were positive and negative determinants, respectively, for clinical benefit. Multivariate analysis further showed that high pTMB was an independent predictive biomarker for both PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22–0.88, p = 0.02] and OS (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18–0.76, p = 0.007). Conclusion: High pTMB (⩾19 mut/Mb) is significantly associated with CBR in patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD-1 agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plasma-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) has demonstrated the potential to guide the personalized treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Inherent differences in mutational genomic profiles of NSCLC exist between Asian and Western populations. However, the published mutational genomic data of NSCLC has largely focused on Western populations. We retrospectively analyzed results from comprehensive NGS of plasma (Guardant360®) from patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC, as seen in clinical practice. Tests were ordered between January 2016 and December 2020 in Hong Kong, Korea, Taiwan, Japan and Southeast Asia. The assay identified single-nucleotide variants (SNV), insertions and deletions, and fusions and amplifications in 74 genes. In total, 1608 plasma samples from patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC were tested. The median turnaround time for test results was 7 days. Of the samples with detectable ctDNA (85.6%), 68.3% had alterations in at least one NCCN-recommended NSCLC biomarker. EGFR driver mutations were most frequent (48.6%), followed by alterations of KRAS (7.9%), ERBB2 (4.1%) and ALK (2.5%). Co-mutations of EGFR and KRAS occurred in 4.7% of samples. KRAS G12C was identified in 18.6% of all samples with KRAS mutations. Common mutations, such as exon 19 deletions and L858R, accounted for 88.4% of EGFR driver mutations. Among the samples with any EGFR driver mutation, T790M was present in 36.9%, including 7.7% with additional alterations associated with osimertinib resistance (MET amplification, C797X). Comprehensive plasma-based NGS provided the timely and clinically informative mutational genomic profiling of advanced non-squamous NSCLC in East Asian patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is approved for the use of EGFR -mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In this study, we investigated the acquired resistance mechanisms in NSCLC patients and patient-derived preclinical models. Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples and plasma samples from 55 NSCLC patients who were treated with osimertinib were collected at baseline and at progressive disease (PD). Next-generation sequencing was performed in tumor and plasma samples using a 600-gene hybrid capture panel designed by AstraZeneca. Osimertinib-resistant cell lines and patient-derived xenografts and cells were generated and whole exome sequencing and RNA sequencing were performed. In vitro experiments were performed to functionally study the acquired mutations identified. Results: A total of 55 patients and a total of 149 samples (57 tumor samples and 92 plasma samples) were analyzed, and among them 36 patients had matched pre- and post-treatment samples. EGFR C797S (14%) mutation was the most frequent EGFR- dependent mechanism identified in all available progression samples, followed by EGFR G824D (6%), V726M (3%), and V843I (3%). Matched pre- and post-treatment sample analysis revealed in-depth acquired mechanisms of resistance. EGFR C797S was still most frequent (11%) among EGFR-dependent mechanism, while among EGFR-independent mechanisms, PIK3CA, ALK, BRAF, EP300, KRAS, and RAF1 mutations were detected. Among Osimertinib-resistant cell lines and patient-derived models, we noted acquired mutations which were potentially targetable such as NRAS p.Q61K, in which resistance could be overcome with combination of osimertinib and trametinib. A patient-derived xenograft established from osimertinib-resistant patient revealed KRAS p.G12D mutation which could be overcome with combination of osimertinib, trametinib, and buparlisib. Conclusion: In this study, we explored the genetic profiles of osimertinib-resistant NSCLC patient samples using targeted deep sequencing. In vitro and in vivo models harboring osimertinib resistance revealed potential novel treatment strategies after osimertinib failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In this open-label, international phase 2 study, the authors assessed the efficacy and safety of olmutinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had a confirmed T790M mutation and disease progression on previous epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.Methods: Patients aged ≥20 years received once-daily oral olmutinib 800 mg continuously in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (patients who had a confirmed best overall response of a complete or partial response), assessed by central review. Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate, the duration of objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03).Results: Overall, 162 patients (median age, 63 years; women, >60%) were enrolled from 68 sites in 9 countries. At the time of database cutoff, 23.5% of enrolled patients remained on treatment. The median treatment duration was 6.5 months (range, 0.03-21.68 months). Overall, 46.3% of patients (95% CI, 38.4%-54.3%) had a confirmed objective response (all partial responses). The best overall response (the objective response rate regardless of confirmation) was 51.9% (84 patients; 95% CI, 43.9%-59.8%). The confirmed disease control rate for all patients was 86.4% (95% CI, 80.2%-91.3%). The median duration of objective response was 12.7 months (95% CI, 8.3-15.4 months). Estimated median progression-free survival was 9.4 months (95% CI, 6.9-12.3 months), and estimated median overall survival was 19.7 months (95% CI, 15.1 months to not reached). All patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events, and 71.6% of patients had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events.Conclusions: Olmutinib has meaningful clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer who received previous epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: ASTRIS is a large real-world, open-label, multinational clinical study of osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have previously received a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). We report data from the Korean ASTRIS subgroup.Methods: Adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with a confirmed T790M mutation, WHO performance status of 0-2 and prior EGFR-TKI therapy, received osimertinib 80 mg once daily. Efficacy outcomes were overall survival (OS), investigator-assessed response rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS), and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD).Results: At data cut-off (20 October 2017), 466 Korean patients were enrolled. Baseline EGFR molecular testing was mainly performed on biopsied tissue (75.1%). Baseline mutations co-occurring with T790M included exon 19 deletions (60.7%) and L858R (32.8%). 1-year OS was 82.7% (OS data not matured at data cut-off). Overall, RR was 71.0%, median PFS was 12.4 months and median TTD was 15.0 months. In patients with/without CNS metastases, RR was 68.0% and 79.6%, respectively; median PFS, 10.8 and 11.0 months, respectively; and median TTD, 11.2 and 14.7 months, respectively. Overall, 31.1% of patients experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE), leading to dose modification (12.0%), discontinuation (5.2%) or death (2.8%). Serious AEs (24.9%) included pulmonary embolism (1.7%), pleural effusion (1.7%), and pneumonia (1.5%).Conclusion: In this real-world subgroup analysis of Korean patients in the ASTRIS study, osimertinib demonstrated comparable clinical efficacy to that attained in the global ASTRIS study and other clinical trials, with no new safety concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed at sensitizing mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene represents a critical pillar in non-small cell lung cancer treatment. Despite the excellent disease control with initial EGFR TKI therapy, acquired resistance is ubiquitous and remains a key challenge. Investigations into the mechanisms which foster resistance to EGFR TKIs has led to the discovery of novel biomarkers and drug targets, and in turn has enabled the development of third-generation TKIs and proposals for rational therapeutic combinations. The threonine-to-methionine substitution mutation at position 790 (T790M) is clinically validated to engender refractoriness to first- and second-generation TKIs, and is a standard-of-care predictive biomarker used in therapeutic stratification. Clinical use of liquid biopsy approaches for assessment of T790M mutations continues to increase, with growing advocacy for serial monitoring of tumor evolution. For patients who are T790M-negative, cytotoxic chemotherapy or protracted EGFR TKI treatment are acceptable treatment standards after disease progression, although combinations of targeted therapies and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy may offer promising alternatives in the future. Among T790M-positive patients, the third-generation EGFR TKI, osimertinib, has shown superiority over both platinum-doublet chemotherapy and 1st generation EGFR TKI in randomized clinical trials, and exhibits enhanced in vitro selectivity for mutant EGFR receptors and pharmacokinetics compared to earlier-generation TKIs. This article appraises the key literature on the contemporary management of non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs, and envisions future directions in translational and clinical research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the use of EGFR TKIs, patient survival is now prolonged and as a consequence, a higher chance of development of CNS metastases has been observed during the course of the disease. CNS metastases remains a therapeutically challenging subset of patient to treat owing to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Prior to routine EGFR mutation testing, surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery and/or whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) were the main treatment options whereas treatment options for patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) included intra-thecal chemotherapy, WBRT, and ventriculo-peritoneal shunting. Unfortunately outcome for both BM and LM remains poor with median survival between 3 and 6 months. Systemic treatment with EGFR TKIs had been effective in the treatment of intracranial metastases but efficacy of early generation TKIs were hampered by its limited BBB penetration. The next generation EGFR TKIs osimertinib and AZD3759 have improved BBB penetration and the BLOOM study of osimertinib and AZD3759 has reported highly promising intracranial efficacy and may herald a new frontier to treat this therapeutically challenging subset of advanced EGFR mutant patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since the discovery of sensitizing EGFR mutations as a predictive marker of sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the field of targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been revolutionized. Patients harbouring these sensitizing mutations treated with EGFR TKI have derived significant clinical outcome when compared with standard platinum based chemotherapy doublets. However disease progression invariably occurs at a median of about 9–13 months from initiation treatment, if acquired resistance commonly due to the development of EGFR T790M mutation. A novel class of “third generation” EGFR TKIs have been developed that is sensitising and T790M mutant-specific whilst sparing WT EGFR, representing a significant breakthrough in the treatment in NSCLC patients with acquired resistance harboring these genotypes. Early phase clinical data suggest the third generation EGFR TKIs such as osimertinib, rociletinib, and HM61713 are highly efficacious and well tolerated. Another promising class of EGFR TKI such as AZD3759 has been designed to penetrate blood brain barrier to treat brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease and has showed promising responses in patients with brain metastases. Acquired resistance to third generation EGFR TKIs has been reported including EGFR C797S. Given its non-invasive nature, plasma ctDNA is being explored as a possible approach to detect T790M mutation and to also inform on novel molecular mechansims of tertiary resistance to third generation EGFR TKIs. An understanding of the mechanisms of acquired resistance to the third-generation EGFR TKIs will greatly aid in the development of the next generation of EGFR TKIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

New insight on the interaction between the immune system and tumor has identified the programmed death-1/programmed death-1 ligand pathway to be a key player in evading host immune response. The immune checkpoint modulator, nivolumab (BMS-936558/ONO-4538), is the first PD-1 inhibitor to gain regulatory approval, for the treatment of patients with unresectable melanoma. This review will discuss results from early phase studies of nivolumab in solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as studies of nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy, other immune modulators and molecular targeted therapy in patients with NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background This study assesses whether MET expression in tumor tissue is associated with an increased sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors ( TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer ( NSCLC) patients. Methods This retrospective study included 69 NSCLC participants with available tumor tissue and data on treatment response and survival. MET and hepatocyte growth factor expression in tumor tissue were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Results Positive tMET expression correlated with a shorter progression-free survival ( PFS; P = 0.003) and overall survival ( OS; P = 0.05). Positive p Y1234/1235 expression was significantly associated with a longer PFS ( P = 0.031) and OS ( P = 0.012). In multivariable analyses, tMET and p Y1234/1235 expression were independent factors for PFS and OS, respectively. ( tMET, PFS; P = 0.02, OS; P = 0.0007 and p Y1234/1234, PFS; P = 0.01, OS; P = 0.004). Conclusions This study suggests that total and phosphorylated MET expression in tumor tissue is potentially useful for the selection of NSCLC patients who are likely to benefit from EGFR- TKIs, irrespective of their EGFR status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: This study focused on the association between preoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and pathologic parameters in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our primary objective was to find pathologic factors that may explain poor prognosis in patients with preoperative serum CRP elevation. Methods: The records of 102 patients who had undergone pulmonary resection of NSCLC were reviewed. The association between preoperative serum CRP levels and variables that had p-values of less than 0.05 in t-test or one-way ANOVA was examined using multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Mean serum CRP level prior to surgery was 3.8±4.9 (range, 0.1–19.8) mg/dL. The Pearson correlation coefficient indicated that serum CRP level and pathologic tumor diameter are positively correlated (r =0.487, p <0.001). Serum CRP levels were associated with sex (male vs. female, p =0.003), smoking status (smoker vs. never smoker, p =0.007), histology (squamous vs. non-squamous, p =0.001), tumor size (size>3cm vs. size≤3, p <0.001), tumor necrosis (yes vs. no, p <0.001), lymphovascular invasion (yes vs. no, p <0.001), and pleural invasion (P0 vs. P1 vs. P2 vs. P3, p =0.013), but not with age (age>64.5 vs. age≤64.5, p =0.508), atelectasis or obstructive pneumonia (yes vs. no, p =0.119), location of tumor (peripheral vs. central, p =0.474), and lymph node involvement (N0 vs. N1 vs. N2 vs. N3, p =0.558). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that pathologic tumor size (β =0.583, p =0.005) and lymphovascular invasion (β =3.002, p =0.009) were associated with preoperative serum CRP level. Conclusion: Our results indicate that lymphovascular invasion and pathologic tumor size are associated with preoperative serum CRP level, which may be considered a prognostic factor in patients with NSCLC. This additional information might serve as a basis to explain poor prognosis in patients with preoperative serum CRP elevation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Simple Summary: MET amplification is one of the resistance determinants after EGFR-TKI therapy in EGFR mutant NSCLC. In this study, we evaluated the emergence of MET amplification after EGFR-TKI treatment failure. The median progression-free survival associated with the most recent EGFR-TKI treatment was shorter in MET amplification-positive patients than in negative patients. Smoking history and less intracranial progression are associated with MET amplification. Suboptimal responses with previous EGFR-TKI are associated with MET amplification. Proper MET amplification screening for therapeutic targeting is needed. Objectives: Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ultimately acquire resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) during treatment. In 5–22% of these patients, resistance is mediated by aberrant mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) gene amplification. Here, we evaluated the emergence of MET amplification after EGFR-TKI treatment failure based on clinical parameters. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 186 patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC for MET amplification status by in situ hybridization (ISH) assay after EGFR-TKI failure. We collected information including baseline patient characteristics, metastatic locations and generation, line, and progression-free survival (PFS) of EGFR-TKI used before MET evaluation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate associations between MET amplification status and clinical variables. Results: Regarding baseline EGFR mutations, exon 19 deletion was predominant (57.5%), followed by L858R mutation (37.1%). The proportions of MET ISH assays performed after first/second-generation and third-generation TKI failure were 66.7% and 33.1%, respectively. The median PFS for the most recent EGFR-TKI treatment was shorter in MET amplification-positive patients than in MET amplification-negative patients (median PFS 7.0 vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.004). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that a history of smoking, short PFS on the most recent TKI, and less intracranial progression were associated with a high probability of MET amplification (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our results demonstrated the distinct clinical characteristics of patients with MET amplification-positive NSCLC after EGFR-TKI therapy. Our clinical prediction can aid physicians in selecting patients eligible for MET amplification screening and therapeutic targeting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Amivantamab was the first approved agent for post-platinum EGFR ex20ins NSCLC. • IRRs with amivantamab were low grade with proactive management and split dosing. • IRRs primarily are first-infusion events, rarely occurring with ensuing doses. • Amivantamab administration should include IRR monitoring and as-needed intervention. Amivantamab, a fully humanized EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, has antitumor activity in diverse EGFR- and MET-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a safety profile consistent with associated on-target activities. Infusion-related reaction(s) (IRR[s]) are reported commonly with amivantamab. We review IRR and subsequent management in amivantamab-treated patients. Patients treated with the approved dose of intravenous amivantamab (1050 mg, <80 kg; 1400 mg, ≥80 kg) in CHRYSALIS—an ongoing, phase 1 study in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC—were included in this analysis. IRR mitigations included split first dose (350 mg, day 1 [D1]; remainder, D2), reduced initial infusion rates with proactive infusion interruption, and steroid premedication before initial dose. For all doses, pre-infusion antihistamines and antipyretics were required. Steroids were optional after the initial dose. As of 3/30/2021, 380 patients received amivantamab. IRRs were reported in 256 (67%) patients. Signs/symptoms of IRR included chills, dyspnea, flushing, nausea, chest discomfort, and vomiting. Most of the 279 IRRs were grade 1 or 2; grade 3 and 4 IRR occurred in 7 and 1 patients, respectively. Most (90%) IRRs occurred on cycle 1, D1 (C1D1); median time-to-first-IRR onset during C1D1 was 60 min; and first-infusion IRRs did not compromise subsequent infusions. Per protocol, IRR was mitigated on C1D1 with holding of infusion (56% [214/380]), reinitiating at reduced rate (53% [202/380]), and aborting infusion (14% [53/380]). C1D2 infusions were completed in 85% (45/53) of patients who had C1D1 infusions aborted. Four patients (1% [4/380]) discontinued treatment due to IRR. In studies aimed at elucidating the underlying mechanism(s) of IRR, no pattern was observed between patients with versus without IRR. IRRs with amivantamab were predominantly low grade and limited to first infusion, and rarely occurred with subsequent dosing. Close monitoring for IRR with the initial amivantamab dose and early intervention at first IRR signs/symptoms should be part of routine amivantamab administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Advances in the understanding of the role of the immune system in tumor immunosurveillance have resulted in the recognition that tumors can evade immune destruction via the dysregulation of co-inhibitory or checkpoint signals. This has led to the development of a generation immunotherapeutic agents targeting the immune checkpoint pathway. Recent early phase studies of immune checkpoint modulators, such as CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in NSCLC have reported promising results with prolonged clinical responses and tolerable toxicity. This article provides an overview of co-stimulatory and inhibitory molecules that regulate the immune response to tumors, recent therapies that have been developed to exploit these interactions and the role of predictive biomarkers in treatment selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in Korean patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who failed platinum-based chemotherapy. Materials and methods In this multicenter, open-label, Phase II study, 100 patients with stage IIIB or IV squamous (n = 44) or non-squamous (n = 56) NSCLC received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks for 6 weeks per treatment cycle. Patients continued treatment until disease progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs), and then entered a follow-up phase. The primary efficacy endpoint was the centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR). Results The ORR was 20.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.3–28.9%) in the total population, 15.9% (7/44 patients; 95% CI: 7.9–29.4%) in patients with squamous NSCLC, and 23.2% (13/56 patients; 95% CI: 14.1–35.8%) in patients with non-squamous NSCLC. Median overall survival was 13.9 (95% CI: 10.8–18.5) months in the total population, 12.3 (95% CI: 8.2–18.5) months in squamous NSCLC, and 16.3 (95% CI: 10.8, −) months in non-squamous NSCLC. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 (95% CI: 1.4–5.7), 2.6 (95% CI: 1.3–5.7), and 5.3 (95% CI: 1.4–7.1) months in the total, squamous, and non-squamous NSCLC populations, respectively. The median duration of response was 11.7 (95% CI: 5.6, −), 12.0 (95% CI: 4.8, −), and 12.1 (95% CI: 3.0, −) months in the total, squamous, and non-squamous NSCLC populations, respectively. The most frequent AEs were decreased appetite, dyspnea, and cough in 43 (43.0%), 32 (32.0%), and 29 (29.0%) patients, respectively. The most common Grade ≥3 AE was pneumonia, occurring in 7.0% of patients. Common treatment-related AEs included decreased appetite (14.0%) and pruritus (6.0%), neither of which was Grade ≥3. Conclusion The efficacy and safety of nivolumab in Korean patients with advanced or recurrent squamous or non-squamous NSCLC are consistent with previous reports. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, approved for first-line treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated experience of afatinib within a compassionate use program (CUP). Methods The afatinib CUP was an open-label, multicenter, single-arm program in Korea. We enrolled patients with stage IV NSCLC and who had received at least one line of previous cytotoxic chemotherapy and previous EGFR TKI treatment with either an EGFR mutation or documented clinical benefit. The starting dose of afatinib was 50 mg once daily. Results From August 2011 to September 2014, 332 patients received at least one dose of afatinib. Most patients were registered in the CUP for fourth- or fifth-line treatment with afatinib. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 98.1% of patients, including 29.8% with serious AEs. The most common AEs (all grades) were diarrhea (90.1%) and skin rash (62.0%). Dose reductions occurred in 60.5% of patients and discontinuations due to AEs were reported in 11.1% of patients. The response rate and median time to treatment failure (TTF) were 27.4% and 3.3 months (CI 95%, 2.8–3.8 months), respectively, in this highly pretreated population. In subgroup analysis, ECOG PS 0 or 1 and immediate pretreatment with pemetrexed monotherapy or a platinum doublet were associated with a longer TTF for afatinib. Conclusions No additional or unexpected safety concerns were observed, and afatinib demonstrated moderate antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib in a real-world setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Major advances with the development of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune check-point inhibitors have ushered in a new era in lung cancer therapy. Whilst pre-clinical studies suggest EGFR-driven NSCLC inhibit antitumor immunity through the activation of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, epidemiology studies suggest EGFR mutant NSCLC are more likely to have decreased PD-L1 expression. The superiority of single agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors over docetaxel in pre-treated EGFR mutant NSCLC appears to be moderated. Several mechanisms for a poor response to immune checkpoint have been proposed including a lower tumor mutation burden, and an uninflamed and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Predictive biomarkers to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors sensitivity in patients with EGFR mutations are required. The role of EGFR TKI in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor is currently being investigated intensively in multiple clinical trials and outcomes from these trials are immature and the optimal sequence, schedule and dosing remains to be determined. A careful evaluation will be required in view of the increased toxicities reported in some of the early studies of combination therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Despite initial responses to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer, patients invariably develop acquired resistance. In this study, we performed next-generation sequencing in pre- and post-EGFR-TKI tumor samples to identify novel resistance mechanisms to EGFR-TKIs. Material and methods We collected tumor tissues before EGFR-TKI treatment and after progression from 19 NSCLC patients to analyze genomic alterations in 409 cancer related genes. Bioinformatics analyses were used to identify mutations in which the allele frequencies are significantly changed, or newly appeared after progression. Results Overall, mutation rates and compositions were similar between pre- and post-EGFR-TKI tumors. We identified EGFR T790M as the most common mechanism of acquired resistance (63.2%). No pre-EGFR-TKI tumor had a preexisting T790M mutation, suggesting that tumors acquired T790M mutations following progression on EGFR-TKIs. Compared to T790M-positive tumors, T790M-negative tumors showed relatively high tumor mutation burden and shorter survival, suggesting T790M-negative patients as a potential candidate for immune checkpoint inhibitors. TP53 mutation was also significantly enriched in the T790M-negative tumors. Finally, we described here for the first time a novel missense mutation (T263P), which occurred concurrently with an activating G719A mutation, in the extracellular domain II of EGFR in a patient with poor response to erlotinib. Ba/F3 cells harboring EGFR T263P/G719A mutation showed higher sensitivity to afatinib, compared to gefitinib due to inhibition of EGFR/HER2 heterodimerization. Conclusion Comprehensive genomic analysis of post-EGFR-TKI tumors can provide novel insight into the complex molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To characterize the expression of PD-L1, PD-1, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM3) in epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methods Samples from 90 patients with newly diagnosed advanced stage NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations and treated with first line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) within 3 months of diagnosis were stained for CTLA-4, PD-L1, PD-1, TIM-3 and CD3 expression by immunohistochemistry. Results PD-L1 was present in at least 1% of immune and tumor cells in 44% and 59% of samples, respectively. In multivariate analysis, increased CD3 immune shaped cell (ISC) counts (HR 2.805, p = 0.034) and high PD-L1 tumor H-score (HR 3.805, p = 0.022) was associated with a shorter progression free survival and high CTLA-4 ISC counts was associated with borderline overall survival significance (HR 1.054, p = 0.061). Conclusion Tumor PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with a shorter PFS whereas immune cell CTLA-4 may be prognostic for OS. Our findings support the ongoing development of CTLA-4 and PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors in this important molecularly defined subset of lung adenocarcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Lazertinib showed comparable efficacy and safety in real-world clinical settings. • Lazertinib demonstrated durable disease control both systematic and intracranially. • The most common adverse event was paresthesia which was manageable by dose modification. • Further development of lazertinib in 1st line is highly warranted. Lazertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that provides a high level of selectivity for sensitizing and p.Thr790Met (T790M) EGFR mutations. We aimed to collect real-world data regarding the efficacy and safety of lazertinib. This study included patients treated with lazertinib for T790M-mutated non-small cell lung cancer who had previously been treated with an EGFR-TKI. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS). Additionally, this study evaluated overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), duration of response (DOR), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Drug safety was also assessed. In a study of 103 patients, 90 received lazertinib as a second- or third-line therapy. The ORR and DCR were 62.1% and 94.2%, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 11.1 months, and the median PFS period was 13.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.0–not reached [NR]) months. OS, DOR, and TTF had not yet been determined. In a subgroup of 33 patients with evaluable brain metastases, the intracranial DCR and ORR were 93.5% and 57.6%, respectively. The median intracranial PFS period was 17.1 (95% CI, 13.9–NR) months. Approximately 17.5% of patients had dose modification or discontinuation due to adverse events, with the most common being grade 1 or 2 paresthesia. The efficacy and safety of lazertinib were recapitulated in a real-world study reflecting routine clinical practice in Korea, showing durable disease control both systematically and intracranially, with manageable side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) abnormalities including amplification, mutation, and overexpression are frequent in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of ER2, a novel human anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, in NSCLC. Methods A panel of NSCLC cell lines (A549, H460, H322, H358, H1299, HCC827, PC9, H1975, and PC9-GR) was used to evaluate in vitro antitumor activity of ER2 and cetuximab. The inhibitory effects of ER2 and cetuximab on downstream signaling were assessed by western blot. Secreted VEGF was measured by Human VEGF Quantikine ELISA kit. Antitumor effects of ER2 and cetuximab as single agents and in combination with cisplatin were evaluated in H322, HCC827 and A549 xenograft models. Results ER2 efficiently inhibits EGFR and its downstream signaling molecules including Akt and Erk1/2 in NSCLC cell lines with wild-type or mutant EGFR. ER2 inhibited cell viability of H322, HCC827 and A549 cells in a dose-dependent manner by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Also, ER2 suppressed EGF-stimulated VEGF production as efficiently as cetuximab in H322, HCC827 and A549 cells. Moreover, ER2 alone and in combination with cisplatin showed a significant anti-tumor efficacy in xenograft mouse models. Conclusion Taken together, ER2 has significant anti-tumor activity in in vitro and in vivo NSCLC models, suggesting a rationale for clinical development of ER2 in NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anoctamin 1 (ANO1) is a calcium-activated chloride channel found in various cell types and is overexpressed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a major cause of cancer-related mortality. With the rising interest in development of druggable compounds for NSCLC, there has been a corresponding rise in interest in ANO1, a novel drug target for NSCLC. However, as ANO1 inhibitors that have been discovered simultaneously exhibit both the functions of an inhibition of ANO1 channel as well as a reduction of ANO1 protein levels, it is unclear which of the two functions directly causes the anticancer effect. In this study, verteporfin, a chemical compound that reduces ANO1 protein levels was identified through high-throughput screening. Verteporfin did not inhibit ANO1-induced chloride secretion but reduced ANO1 protein levels in a dose-dependent manner with an IC 50 value of ~300 nM. Moreover, verteporfin inhibited neither P2Y receptor-induced intracellular Ca2+ mobilization nor cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel activity, and molecular docking studies revealed that verteporfin bound to specific sites of ANO1 protein. Confirming that verteporfin reduces ANO1 protein levels, we then investigated the molecular mechanisms involved in its effect on NSCLC cells. Interestingly, verteporfin decreased ANO1 protein levels, the EGFR-STAT3 pathway as well as ANO1 mRNA expression. Verteporfin reduced the viability of ANO1-expressing cells (PC9, and gefitinib-resistant PC9) and induced apoptosis by increasing caspase-3 activity and PARP-1 cleavage. However, it did not affect hERG channel activity. These results show that the anticancer mechanism of verteporfin is caused via the down-regulation of ANO1. [Display omitted] • Verteporfin reduced ANO1 protein levels in a dose dependent manner. • Verteporfin did not inhibit ANO1-induced chloride secretion. • Verteporfin decreased p-EGFR and p-STAT3 levels via reduction of ANO1 protein levels. • Verteporfin decreased cell viability on PC9 cells and gefitinib-resistant PC9 cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) of the lung is the second-largest subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), causing an estimated 400,000 deaths per year worldwide. Recent developments in cancer genome sequencing technology expanded our knowledge of driver mutations, which were identified as novel candidates for targeted therapy in various cancers. Successful targeted treatments for lung adenocarcinoma, NSCLC's primary subtype, with EGFR mutation or ALK fusion are clinically available, and a clinical trial of personalized targeted therapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma is underway by the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium. Although there are targeted treatments for lung adenocarcinoma, no personalized therapies currently exist for SQCC. Recently, comprehensive genomic characterization of lung SQCC using massively parallel sequencing has enabled us to identify several potential driver mutations/signaling pathways. These are FGFR1 amplifications, PI3KCA mutations, PTEN mutations/deletions, PDGFRA amplifications/mutations, and DDR2 mutations. The march toward personalized therapy may have taken a step forward with the discovery of these potential biomarkers for the treatment of SQCC of the lung. This article reviewed the current knowledge of genomic landscape of lung SQCC and summarized ongoing clinical trials of targeted agents for lung SQCC. Also, we will suggest several other actionable mutations with matching drugs that should be investigated in future clinical trials for the personalized treatment of lung SQCC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality across the world. Although the majority of lung cancer is attributed to tobacco smoke, approximately 25% of lung cancers worldwide occur in lifelong never smokers. Over the past decades, the bulk of research on this disease suggested that several genetic, environmental, hormonal, and viral factors might increase the risk of lung cancer among never smokers. However, there has been no dominant risk factor whose significance has been validated across racial and ethnic groups. However, this subset of lung cancers has received renewed attention due to the introduction of the epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK) inhibitors showing the dramatic therapeutic response on selected patients with activating EGFR mutations which occur more commonly in never smokers. The treatment strategy blocking EGFR pathway in EGFR-mutant lung cancer represents a remarkable example of molecular targeted therapies which completely repress tumor by inhibition of driving oncogenes. More recently, a surprising positive effect of an ALK inhibitor on EML4–ALK-positive lung cancer has been suggested that lung cancer in never smokers is likely to be an assemblage of molecularly defined subsets which would be a good candidate for personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]