Search

Introduction: Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) is a cytokine of the TGFβ family. Here, we analyzed GDF15 levels in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) who participated in OCOG-ALMERA (NCT02115464), a phase II randomized clinical trial, that investigated metformin in combination with standard of care concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). OCOG-ALMERA was not able to demonstrate benefit in the metformin arm. Therefore, biomarker studies are needed to better define stratification parameters for future trials. Methods: Patients were randomized to treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and concurrent chest radiotherapy (60–66 Gy), with or without metformin (2000 mg/d). The trial collected tumor volume parameters, survival outcomes, and patient blood plasma at baseline, during (weeks 1 and 6) and 6 months after cCRT. Plasma GDF15 levels were assayed with the ELISA method. Statistical analyses explored associations between GDF15, survival outcomes, and radiotherapy tumor volumes. Results: Baseline plasma levels of GDF15 were elevated in study patients, they increased during cCRT (p < 0.001), and the addition of metformin was associated with a further increase (week 6, p = 0.033). Baseline GDF15 levels correlated with the radiotherapy gross target volume (GTV, p < 0.01), while week 1 of radiotherapy levels correlated with radiotherapy planned target volume (PTV, p < 0.006). In multivariate analysis, baseline plasma GDF15 was prognostic for poor relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: GDF15 is a plasma marker that responds to the treatment of unresected LA-NSCLC with cCRT and metformin. GDF15 levels correspond with tumor volume and increased GDF15 levels predict for poor RFS and OS. These results require validation in larger clinical trial datasets. Highlights: Analysis of plasma specimens of OCOG-ALMERA, a phase II clinical trial that investigated metformin in combination with standard of care concurrent chemoradiotherapy, suggests that the cytokine growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) may be a promising biomarker in unresected locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). GDF15 levels increased during chemoradiotherapy, did more so in metformin-treated patients and corresponded with the radiotherapy clinical target volumes. Baseline plasma levels of GDF15 predicted overall and relapse-free survival. Validation of these results within larger clinical trials could lead to the establishment of an easily assessable plasma biomarker that could guide LA-NSCLC treatment in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET/CT) is now considered a standard investigation for the staging of new cases of stage III NSCLC. However, there is not published level 3 evidence demonstrating the impact of FDG-PET/CT on appropriate therapy in this setting. Using retrospective population-based data, we sought to examine the role and timing that FDG-PET/ CT scans play in influencing treatment choice, as well as survival in patients diagnosed with stage III NSCLC. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with stage III NSCLC from 2009-2017 in Ontario were identified from the IC/ES (formerly Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences) database. FDG-PET/CT utilization over time, trends in mediastinal biopsy technique and usage, the impact of FDG-PET/ CT on overall survival (OS), and its influence on use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were explored. The impact of timing of pretreatment FDG-PET/CT on OS was also analyzed (≤28 days prior to treatment, 29-56 days prior, and >56 days prior). Results: Between 2007 and 2017, a total of 13 796 people were diagnosed with stage III NSCLC in Ontario. FDG-PET/CT utilization increased over time with 0% of cases in 2007 and 74% in 2017 with pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT scans. The number of patients who received a mediastinal biopsy similarly increased in this timeframe increasing from 41% to 53%. More patients with pre-treatment FDGPET/ CT scans received curative-intent therapy than those who did not: 23% vs 13% for CRT (p<0.001), and 23% vs 10% for surgery (p<0.001). Median OS was longer in those with FDG-PET/CT scans prior to treatment (17 vs 11 months), as was 5-year survival (22% vs 14%, p<0.001), and this held true on both univariate and multivariate analyses. Timing of FDG-PET/CT scan relative to treatment was not associated with differences in OS. Conclusion: Improvements in OS were seen in this cohort of stage III NSCLC patients who underwent a pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT scan. This can likely be attributed to stage-appropriate therapy due to more complete staging using FDG-PET/CT. This study stresses the importance of complete staging for suspected stage III NSCLC using FDG-PET/CT, and a need for continued advocacy for increased access to FDG-PET/CT scans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy for tumors in close proximity to the central mediastinal structures has been associated with a high risk of toxicity. This study (NCT03306680) aimed to determine the maximally tolerated dose of stereotactic body radiation therapy for ultracentral non-small cell lung carcinoma, using a time-to-event continual reassessment methodology. Patients with T1-3N0M0 (≤6 cm) non-small cell lung carcinoma were eligible. The maximally tolerated dose was defined as the dose of radiation therapy associated with a ≤30% rate of grade (G) 3 to 5 prespecified treatment-related toxicity occurring within 2 years of treatment. The starting dose level was 60 Gy in 8 daily fractions. The dose-maximum hotspot was limited to 120% and within the planning tumor volume; tumors with endobronchial invasion were excluded. This primary analysis occurred 2 years after completion of accrual. Between March 2018 and April 2021, 30 patients were enrolled at 5 institutions. The median age was 73 years (range, 65-87) and 17 (57%) were female. Planning tumor volume was abutting proximal bronchial tree in 19 (63%), esophagus 5 (17%), pulmonary vein 1 (3.3%), and pulmonary artery 14 (47%). All patients received 60 Gy in 8 fractions. The median follow-up was 37 months (range, 8.9-51). Two patients (6.7%) experienced G3-5 adverse events related to treatment: 1 patient with G3 dyspnea and 1 G5 pneumonia. The latter had computed tomography findings consistent with a background of interstitial lung disease. Three-year overall survival was 72.5% (95% CI, 52.3%-85.3%), progression-free survival 66.1% (95% CI, 46.1%-80.2%), local control 89.6% (95% CI, 71.2%-96.5%), regional control 96.4% (95% CI, 77.2%-99.5%), and distant control 85.9% (95% CI, 66.7%-94.5%). Quality-of-life scores declined numerically over time, but the decreases were not clinically or statistically significant. : Sixty Gy in 8 fractions, planned and delivered with only a moderate hotspot, has a favorable adverse event rate within the prespecified acceptability criteria and results in excellent control for ultracentral tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Uncontrolled studies suggest that the addition of high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (HDRIB) to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) may improve palliation for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential clinical benefit of adding HDRIB to EBRT in a multicenter randomized trial. Patients with symptomatic stage III or IV NSCLC with endobronchial disease were randomized to EBRT (20 Gy in 5 daily fractions over 1 week or 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions over 2 weeks) or the same EBRT plus HDRIB (14 Gy in 2 fractions separated by 1 week). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved symptomatic improvement in patient-reported overall lung cancer symptoms on the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) at 6 weeks after randomization. Secondary outcomes included improvement in individual symptoms, symptom-progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. The planned sample size was 250 patients based on detection of symptomatic improvement from 40% to 60% with a 2-sided α of.05 and 80% power. A total of 134 patients were randomized over 4.5 years: 67 to each arm. The study closed early owing to slow accrual. The mean age was 69.8 years, and 67% of patients had metastatic disease. At 6 weeks, 19 patients (28.4%) in the EBRT arm and 20 patients (29.9%) in the EBRT plus HDRIB arm experienced an improvement in lung cancer symptoms (P =.84). When limited to patients who completed the LCSS, percentages were 40.4% versus 47.6%, respectively (P =.49). Between group differences in mean change scores (0.3-0.5 standard deviations) in favor of EBRT plus HDRIB were observed for overall symptoms, but only hemoptysis was significantly improved (P =.03). No significant differences were observed in progression-free or overall survival. Grade 3/4 toxicities were similar between groups. Small to moderate improvements were seen in symptom relief with the combined therapy, but they did not reach statistical significance. Further research is necessary before recommending HDRIB in addition to EBRT for palliation of lung cancer symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the standard of care in young patients is chemoradiotherapy, but this standard is not as clearly established for older patients. We aimed to determine the efficacy and harm associated with chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in elderly (≥70 years), stage III NSCLC patients through a systematic review. We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science and conference proceedings. Two reviewers independently identified randomized trials (RCT) and extracted trial-level data. Risk of bias was assessed and meta-analysis was conducted looking at survival and safety outcomes. We included three trials and subgroup data from one systematic review. The three RCTs had high risk of bias due primarily to lack of blinding and the systematic review scored 4/11 using the AMSTAR tool. Overall survival (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53–0.82; I2 0%; 3 trials; 407 patients) and progression-free survival (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53–0.85; I2 0%; 2 trials; 327 patients) both favored chemoradiotherapy. Risk of treatment-related death and grade 3+ pneumonitis were not significantly different between groups. In conclusion, treatment of stage III NSCLC patients 70 years or older with chemotherapy and radiotherapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to radiotherapy alone. With the exception of increased hematological toxicity, CRT appears to be tolerable in fit elderly patients and represents a reasonable standard of clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The standard of care in management of patients with good performance status and unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapy is concurrent chemoradiation. Newer techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are replacing 3-dimensional conformal radiation (3DCRT) despite low-quality evidence of improved outcomes. We used population-based data to examine survival outcomes by radiation technique.Methods and Materials: A population-based retrospective cohort of patients with stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiation from 2009 to 2017 in Ontario were identified. The primary outcome was a comparison of overall survival among 3DCRT, IMRT, and VMAT, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Cox regression was used to investigate effect of radiation type on overall survival adjusted for other covariates.Results: A total of 3872 patients were treated with 3DCRT (n = 1178), IMRT (n = 1847), or VMAT (n = 847). A decline in 3DCRT and increase in VMAT use were observed over time. Median survival in months was 21.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.0-22.8) for 3DCRT, 23.9 (95% CI, 22.3-25.6) for IMRT, and 24.9 (95% CI, 22.5-27.4) for VMAT, but these differences were not statistically significant (P = .06).Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that survival is not compromised in patients receiving IMRT or VMAT (compared with 3DCRT). Thus, given the potential dosimetric advantages associated with these techniques, VMAT and IMRT are recommended for the management of patients with stage III NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]