Search

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers) PET/CT system. This new system is based on the Siemens Biograph Vision 600, using the same silicon photomultiplier-based detectors with 3.2��3.2��20-mm lutetium-oxoorthosilicate crystals. The Quadra's 32 detector rings provide a fourfold larger axial field of view (AFOV) of 106 cm, enabling imaging of major organs in one bed position. Methods: Physical performance of the scanner was evaluated according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2018 standard with additional experiments to characterize energy resolution. Image quality was assessed with foreground to background ratios of 4:1 and 8:1. Additionally, a clinical 18F-FDG-PET study was reconstructed with varying frame durations. In all experiments, data were acquired using the Quadra's maximum ring distance of 322 crystals (MRD 322), while image reconstructions could only be performed with a maximum ring distance of 85 crystals rings (MRD 85). Results: The spatial resolution at full width half maximum in radial, tangential and axial directions were 3.3, 3.4 and 3.8 mm respectively. The sensitivity was 83 cps/kBq for MRD 85 and 176 cps/kBq for MRD 322. The NECRs at peak were 1613 kcps for MRD 85 and 2956 kcps for MRD 322, both at 27.5 kBq/mL. The respective scatter fractions at peak NECR equaled 36 % and 37 %. The TOF resolution at peak NECR was 228 ps for MRD 85 and 230 ps for MRD 322. Image contrast recovery ranged from 69.6% to 86.9 % for 4:1 contrast ratios and from 77.7 % to 92.6 % for 8:1 contrast ratios reconstructed using PSF-TOF with 8 iterations and 5 subsets. Thirty seconds frames provided readable lesion detectability and acceptable noise levels in clinical images. Conclusion: The Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT has similar spatial and time resolution compared to the Biograph Vision 600 but exhibits improved sensitivity and NECR due to its extended AFOV. The reported spatial resolution, time resolution, and sensitivity makes it a competitive new device in the class of PET-scanners with extended AFOV.

PURPOSE A PET/CT system's imaging capabilities are best described by its point spread function (PSF) in the spatial domain or equivalently by its modulation transfer function (MTF) in the spatial frequency domain. Knowing PSFs or MTFs is a prerequisite for many numerical methods attempting to improve resolution and to reduce the partial volume effect. In PET/CT, the observed PSF is a convolution of the system's intrinsic imaging capabilities including image reconstruction (PSF0) and the positron range function (PRF) of the imaged β(+) emitting isotope. A PRF describes the non-Gaussian distribution of β(+) annihilation events around a hypothetical point source. The main aim was to introduce a new method for determining a PET/CT system's intrinsic MTF (MTF0) from phantom measurements of hot spheres independently of the β(+) emitting isotope used for image acquisition. Secondary aim was to examine non-Gaussian and nonlinear MTFs of a modern iterative reconstruction algorithm. METHODS PET/CT images of seven phantom spheres with volumes ranging from 0.25 to 16 ml and filled either with (18)F or with (68)Ga were acquired and reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP). MTFs were modeled with linear splines. The spline fit iteratively minimized the mean squared error between the acquired PET/CT image and a convolution of the thereof derived PSF with a numerical representation of the imaged hot phantom sphere. For determining MTF0, the numerical sphere representations were convolved with a PRF, simulating a fill with either (18)F or (68)Ga. The MTFs determined by this so-called MTF fit method were compared with MTFs derived from point source measurements and also compared with MTFs derived with a previously published PSF fit method. The MTF fit method was additionally applied to images reconstructed by a vendor iterative algorithm with PSF recovery (Siemens TrueX). RESULTS The MTF fit method was able to determine (18)F and (68)Ga dependent MTFs and MTF0 from FBP reconstructed images. Root-mean-square deviation between fit determined MTFs and point source determined MTFs ranged from 0.023 to 0.039. MTFs from Siemens TrueX reconstructions varied with size of the imaged sphere. CONCLUSIONS MTF0 can be determined regardless of the imaged isotope, when using existing PRF models for the MTF fit method presented. The method proves that modern iterative PET/CT reconstruction algorithms have nonlinear imaging properties. This behaviour is not accessible by point source measurements. MTFs resulting from these clinically applied algorithms need to be estimated from objects of similar geometry to those intended for clinical imaging.

Purpose To determine the thyroid clearance effective half-life T with a common handheld electronic dosimeter (ED) in patients undergoing radioiodine treatment for hyperthyroidism. Methods Dose rates from 12 inpatients were measured daily with an ED and with a clinical uptake counter. The ED was attached to the patient with two different setups, one using a cervical collar and another employing a neck strap. Estimation of T was performed by linear regression analysis of the log of both the ED and the uptake counter measurements versus time. The latter provided the reference data. Results Based on repeated neck strap dose rate measurements, individual Ts were determined with clinically required accuracy. The mean difference from the reference method equaled to -0.09 ± 0.35 days. Conclusions Determination of individual T is feasible with a common handheld ED using the simple and easy to instruct neck strap measurement setup. This simple method complements stationary uptake counter measurements and thus may improve the accuracy of radioiodine treatment planning by adding an individual T for dose calculation.