Search

Rationale: Nucleus accumbens (NAc) dopamine (DA) plays an integral role in overcoming effort costs, as blockade of D 1 and D 2 receptors reduces the choice of larger, more-costly rewards. Similarly, the stress neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) modulates DA transmission and mediates stress-induced alterations in effort-related choice., Objectives: The current study explored how excessive stimulation of different DA receptors within the NAc core and shell alters effort-related decision-making and compared these effects to those induced by CRF stimulation., Methods: Male Long Evans rats were well-trained on an effort-discounting task wherein they choose between a low-effort/low-reward and a high-effort/high-reward lever where the effort requirement increased over blocks (2-20 presses). Dopamine D 1 (SKF 81297, 0.2-2 μg), D 2/3 (quinpirole, 1-10 μg), or D 3 (PD 128,907, 1.5-3 μg) receptor agonists, or CRF (0.5 μg), were infused into the NAc core or shell prior to testing., Results: Stimulation of D 2/3 receptors with quinpirole in the NAc core or shell markedly reduced the choice of high-effort option and increase choice latencies, without altering preference for larger vs smaller rewards. Stimulation of D 1 or D 3 receptors did not alter choice, although SKF 81297 infusions into the shell reduced response vigor. In comparison, core infusions of CRF flattened the discounting curve, reducing effortful choice when costs were low and increasing it when costs were high., Conclusions: Excessive stimulation of NAc D 2 receptors has detrimental effects on effort-related decision-making. Furthermore, CRF stimulation induces dissociable effects on decision-making compared with those induced the effects of stimulation of different DA receptors.

Cognitive deficits in depression can be modelled using the novel object recognition (NOR) test, performance in which is impaired by chronic mild stress (CMS). We aimed to examine the involvement of mesocorticolimbic DA terminal regions, and to establish the substrate for CMS-induced impairment of NOR and its reversal by chronic antidepressant treatment. In experiments 1 and 2, we examined the effect of infusions into medial PFC, dorsal hippocampus (HPC), and nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell of D1 and D2 antagonists and D3 agonist, which were predicted to impair NOR with a short (1 h) delay, and of D1 and D2 agonists and D3 antagonist, which were predicted to facilitate NOR with a long (24 h) delay. Using optimal doses identified in experiment 2, in experiments 3 and 4, we examined effects on drug-stimulated NOR of CMS and chronic treatment with venlafaxine (VFX) or risperidone (RSP). We found a wide involvement of DA systems in memory for NOR: D1 receptors in PFC, HPC, and NAc; D3 receptors in PFC and HPC; and D2 receptors in PFC. CMS impaired D2- and D3-mediated effects in PFC and HPC; antidepressants rescued those effects in PFC but not HPC. The involvement of DA in NOR is multifaceted, but the effects of CMS and antidepressants are more discrete, involving D2 and D3 receptors in PFC specifically. While raising many difficult questions, these results suggest that the D2 and D3 receptors in the medial PFC may be an important substrate for cognitive deficits in depression and their remediation.

Rationale: Nucleus accumbens (NAc) dopamine (DA) plays an integral role in overcoming effort costs, as blockade of D1 and D2 receptors reduces the choice of larger, more-costly rewards. Similarly, the stress neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) modulates DA transmission and mediates stress-induced alterations in effort-related choice. Objectives: The current study explored how excessive stimulation of different DA receptors within the NAc core and shell alters effort-related decision-making and compared these effects to those induced by CRF stimulation. Methods: Male Long Evans rats were well-trained on an effort-discounting task wherein they choose between a low-effort/low-reward and a high-effort/high-reward lever where the effort requirement increased over blocks (2–20 presses). Dopamine D1 (SKF 81297, 0.2–2 μg), D2/3 (quinpirole, 1–10 μg), or D3 (PD 128,907, 1.5–3 μg) receptor agonists, or CRF (0.5 μg), were infused into the NAc core or shell prior to testing. Results: Stimulation of D2/3 receptors with quinpirole in the NAc core or shell markedly reduced the choice of high-effort option and increase choice latencies, without altering preference for larger vs smaller rewards. Stimulation of D1 or D3 receptors did not alter choice, although SKF 81297 infusions into the shell reduced response vigor. In comparison, core infusions of CRF flattened the discounting curve, reducing effortful choice when costs were low and increasing it when costs were high. Conclusions: Excessive stimulation of NAc D2 receptors has detrimental effects on effort-related decision-making. Furthermore, CRF stimulation induces dissociable effects on decision-making compared with those induced the effects of stimulation of different DA receptors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: A variety of studies indicate that CART in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) is involved in the action of psychostimulants. In order to understand in more detail if and how dopamine is involved in the regulation of CART mRNA in the NAcc, the present studies of individual receptors were performed. The D1 agonist, dihydrexidine, and the D1 antagonist, SCH23,390, were administered separately and in combination to adult male rats; however, no changes were found in CART mRNA as measured by in situ hybridization. The D2/3 agonist, quinpirole, was administered either separately or in combination with the D2 selective antagonist, L741,626, or the D3 selective antagonist, GR103,691. Quinpirole produced a decrease in CART mRNA of up to 43%. This effect was blocked by pretreatment with the D3 antagonist GR103, 691, but not by the D2 antagonist, L741,626. CART peptide levels showed a similar decrement after acute quinpirole. CART mRNA levels in the NAcc of D3 mutant mice were found to be higher than that in wild-type animals, but treating the mutants with quinpirole failed to produce a decrease in CART expression like that observed in wild-type rodents. These findings demonstrate that CART is regulated by dopamine in the NAcc, at least partly by D3 dopamine receptors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

While many experiment with drugs, relatively few individuals develop a true addiction. We hypothesized that, in rats, such individual differences in the actions of addictive drugs might be determined by postnatal rearing conditions. To test this idea, we investigated whether stimulant- and stress-induced activation of nucleus accumbens dopamine transmission and dopamine-dependent behaviours might differ among adults rats that had been either repeatedly subjected to prolonged maternal separation or a brief handling procedure or left undisturbed (non-handled) during the first 14 days of life. We found that, in comparison with their handled counterparts, maternally separated and non-handled animals are hyperactive when placed in a novel setting, display a dose-dependent higher sensitivity to cocaine-induced locomotor activity and respond to a mild stressor (tail-pinch) with significantly greater increases in nucleus accumbens dopamine levels. In addition, maternally separated animals were found to sensitize to the locomotor stimulant action of amphetamine when repeatedly stressed under conditions that failed to sensitize handled and non-handled animals. Finally, quantitative receptor autoradiography revealed a lower density of nucleus accumbens-core and striatal dopamine transporter sites in maternally separated animals. Interestingly, we also found greatly reduced D3 dopamine receptor binding and mRNA levels in the nucleus accumbens-shell of handled animals. Together, these findings provide compelling evidence that disruptions in early postnatal rearing conditions can lead to profound and lasting changes in the responsiveness of mesocorticolimbic dopamine neurons to stress and psychostimulants, and suggest a neurobiological basis for individual differences in vulnerability to compulsive drug taking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]