Search

Introduction: Deaths in care homes and "at home" are anticipated to account for a third of UK deaths by 2040. Currently, palliative and end of life care are not part of statutory training in care homes. Reflective practice is a tool that can facilitate practice‐based learning and support. Following a feasibly study to test "online" supportive conversations and reflection sessions (OSCaRS) to support care home staff in relation to death/dying during the first months of the COVID pandemic, a one‐year practice development follow‐up project was undertaken with the aim to create a team of NHS/specialist palliative care (SPC)‐based facilitators to lead and support OSCaRS provision in up to 50 care homes in one region in Scotland—the focus of this paper. Methods: Forty care home managers attended an on‐line session explaining the project, with a similar session held for 19 NHS/SPC‐based nurses external to care homes. Those interested in facilitating OSCaRS then attended three education sessions. Data collected: records of all activities; reflective notes on OSCaRS organised/delivered; a summary of each OSCaRS reflection/learning points; final interviews with NHS/SPC trainee facilitators. Results: A total of 19 NHS/SPC facilitators delivered one or more OSCaRS in 22 participating care homes. However, as of January 2022 only six trained facilitators remained active. Out of the 158 OSCaRS arranged, 96 took place with a total of 262 staff attending. There were three important aspects that emerged: the role, remit, and resources of NHS/SPC supporting OSCaRS; requirements within care homes for establishing OSCaRS; and, the practice‐based learning topics discussed at each OSCaRS. Conclusion: Attempts to establish a team of NHS/SPC facilitators to lead OSCaRS highlights that end of life care education in care homes does not clearly fall within the contractual remit of either group or risks being missed due to more pressing priorities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background care homes collect extensive data about their residents, and their care, in multiple ways, for multiple purposes. We aimed to (i) identify what data are routinely collected and (ii) collate care home managers' views and experiences of collecting, using and sharing data. Methods we examined data collected in six care homes across Lothian, Scotland. We extracted the meta-data, cross-referenced definitions and assessed the degree of harmonisation between care homes and with data sets currently in use in Scotland and internationally. We interviewed care home managers about their views and experiences of collecting, using and sharing data. Results we identified 15 core data items used routinely, with significant heterogeneity in tools and assessments used, and very limited harmonisation. Two overarching themes were identified of importance to the development of a care home data platform: (i) the rationale for collecting data, including to (a) support person-centred care, (b) share information, (c) manage workforce and budget and (d) provide evidence to statutory bodies and (ii) the reality of collecting data, including data accuracy, and understanding data in context. Discussion considerable information is collected by care home staff, in varied formats, with heterogeneity of scope and definition, for range of reasons. We discuss the issues that should be considered to ensure that individual resident-level form the strong foundations for any data platform for care homes, which must also include, robust infrastructure and clear interoperability, with appropriate governance. It must be co-produced by academics, policy makers and sector representatives, with residents, their families and care staff. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The PACE Steps to Success programme is a complex educational and development intervention to improve palliative care in nursing homes. Little research has investigated processes in the cross-cultural adaptation and implementation of interventions in palliative care across countries, taking account of differences in health and social care systems, legal and regulatory policies, and cultural norms. This paper describes a framework for the cross-cultural development and support necessary to implement such an intervention, taking the PACE Steps to Success programme as an exemplar.Methods: The PACE Steps to Success programme was implemented as part of the PACE cluster randomised control trial in seven European countries. A three stage approach was used, a) preparation of resources; b) training in the intervention using a train-the-trainers model; and c) cascading support throughout the implementation. All stages were underpinned by cross-cultural adaptation, including recognising legal and cultural norms, sensitivities and languages. This paper draws upon collated evidence from minutes of international meetings, evaluations of training delivered, interviews with those delivering the intervention in nursing homes and providing and/or receiving support.Results: Seventy eight nursing homes participated in the trial, with half randomized to receive the intervention, 3638 nurses/care assistants were identified at baseline. In each country, 1-3 trainers were selected (total n = 16) to deliver the intervention. A framework was used to guide the cross-cultural adaptation and implementation. Adaptation of three English training resources for different groups of staff consisted of simplification of content, identification of validated implementation tools, a review in 2 nursing homes in each country, and translation into local languages. The same training was provided to all country trainers who cascaded it into intervention nursing homes in local languages, and facilitated it via in-house PACE coordinators. Support was cascaded from country trainers to staff implementing the intervention.Conclusions: There is little guidance on how to adapt complex interventions developed in one country and language to international contexts. This framework for cross-cultural adaptation and implementation of a complex educational and development intervention may be useful to others seeking to transfer quality improvement initiatives in other contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The UK has many excellent care homes that provide high-quality care for their residents; however, across the care home sector, there is a significant need for improvement. Even though the majority of care homes receive a rating of 'good' from regulators, still significant numbers are identified as requiring 'improvement' or are 'inadequate'. Such findings resonate with the public perceptions of long-term care as a negative choice, to be avoided wherever possible--as well as impacting on the career choices of health and social care students. Projections of current demographics highlight that, within 10 years, the part of our population that will be growing the fastest will be those people older than 80 years old with the suggestion that spending on long-term care provision needs to rise from 0.6% of our Gross Domestic Product in 2002 to 0.96% by 2031. Teaching/research-based care homes have been developed in the USA, Canada, Norway, the Netherlands and Australia in response to scandals about care, and the shortage of trained geriatric healthcare staff. There is increasing evidence that such facilities help to reduce inappropriate hospital admissions, increase staff competency and bring increased enthusiasm about working in care homes and improve the quality of care. Is this something that the UK should think of developing? This commentary details the core goals of a Care Home Innovation Centre for training and research as a radical vision to change the culture and image of care homes, and help address this huge public health issue we face. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents information on the effect of using high facilitation while implementing the Gold Standards Framework in Care Homes programme in Great Britain. It was hypothesised that implementing the programme will help in reducing hospital deaths for residents. It is concluded that without national guidelines, facilitation of the programme will vary and its implementation.

Background: In the UK, implementation of the Gold Standards Framework in Care Homes (GSFCH) programme is being promoted to develop the quality of end-of-life care for frail older people living and dying in care homes. Advance care planning (ACP) discussions are an integral part of this. This study explored experiences of initiating and completing these discussions in homes undertaking the GSFCH. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was carried out in three nursing care homes implementing the GSFCH programme. Following an ACP discussion, 28 semi-structured interviews were conducted with the resident, a family member, and the staff member who undertook the ACP. Content analysis was then conducted. Findings: Three main categories of findings emerged: understanding ACP, undertaking ACP discussions, and impact of and reactions to ACP discussions. Staff understanding of ACP varied, affecting the depth of their discussions. Documentation was either a useful prompt or limited the discussion, blocking opportunistic cues and encouraging a 'tick-box' exercise. Residents were open to ACP, although the way it was introduced could affect the results. Families were comforted that the resident's future care had been considered. Education was identified as being important, and role modelling ACP enabled a member of staff to develop their skills and confidence in it. Conclusions: Care home staff need to develop the knowledge, skills, and confidence to engage in discussions around end-of-life care. The assistance of a trained facilitator who role-models this process should be explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In nursing care homes (NCHs), the use of end-of-life care (EoLC) medication has traditionally been requested and prescribed on an individual basis during each resident's last days of life. However, some GPs are reluctant to prescribe EoLC medication in anticipation of symptoms occurring if, at the time of their visit, the resident is symptom-free. Even when prescribed, care home staff can experience difficulties obtaining the medication out of hours. This can result in residents not having access to appropriate medications when they are experiencing symptoms. Aim: This audit aimed to assess the feasibility of NCHs with Gold Standards Framework in Care Homes (GSFCH) accreditation keeping EoLC medications 'as stock', rather than having the medication prescribed and dispensed for individual residents when residents became symptomatic. Methods: Meetings were held with nurse managers of four NCHs with GSFCH accreditation, local pharmacists and the hospice pharmacist. A strategy to implement the stock medication was prepared. A baseline review of the notes of deceased residents 6 months pre-implementation was undertaken and information regarding symptoms and EoLC medication extracted. The review continued for 6 months after the stock EoLC medication was obtained. Results: Three NCHs participated. The notes of 92 deceased residents were examined. Fifty-three per cent of decedents were found to have experienced common EoLC symptoms. The numbers with access to EoLC medication increased once the stock medication was in place. However, some residents still had their own drugs dispensed, despite stock drugs being available. Conclusions: There is a need for all dying residents to have access to EoLC medication. The proper facilitation and implementation of EoLC medication 'as stock' into NCHs with expertise in caring for dying people could save monies at a time of NHS austerity measures. If the NCHs had relied solely on the stock medication, the reduction in medication waste would have been significant. The introduction of stock medication would also solve problems associated with obtaining medication out of hours. Conflicts of interest: none [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Action research is beginning to be utilized within palliative care research to address questions concerned with practice and organizational change. An understanding of appropriate evaluation practices is required in order to ensure that high-quality action research is conducted.Aim: The aim of this paper is to present an account of participatory action research and illustrate the way in which evaluation approaches are integrated within this methodology.Design: Participatory action research will be described identifying its origins, principles and its relationship with evaluation frameworks. The key features of the evaluation process in regard to participatory research are outlined.Setting: Two studies are presented which illustrate the integration of evaluation within a participatory action research framework. The first approach uses a before–after summative evaluation approach in a study undertaken to develop palliative care practice within a UK nursing home context. The evaluation focused upon the impact of the intervention. The second study utilized similar methods and addressed the process of the action research using the Äldreväst Sjuhärad (ÄVS) model to evaluate participation in a peer education programme for advance care planning amongst older adults.Results: These examples of evaluation within action research illustrate how diverse methods can be used. The use of a specific participatory evaluation model ensures the process reflects the underlying participatory principle of action research.Conclusions: Evaluation processes are integral to action research approaches. The specific evaluative methods adopted will reflect the nature and focus of the evaluation being undertaken. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Aim: Increasing numbers of older people are dying in the nursing care home setting. Little is known about the medication needs of the very old and frail in the last weeks of life and how they might differ from a model of care developed for people dying from cancer. Method: A baseline review of medication in the last month of life was undertaken to try and establish current practice of prescribing for this population. The notes of 48 deceased residents in seven nursing care homes were examined, alongside a questionnaire sent to 67 trained nurses. Results: Subcutaneous prescribing only occurred where specialist palliative care teams had been involved with the residents' care. Syringe drivers were used in 23% of cases; however, only three residents required a syringe driver for more than a day and a half. Nurses' confidence and competence in setting up syringe drivers was varied. Conclusions: The use of syringe drivers may not be the most appropriate way of managing symptoms during the dying phase in very frail and old people. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim:This paper explores the barriers that needed to be overcome during the process of implementing an integrated care pathway for the last days of life as a way of developing quality end-of-life care in nursing homes. Methods: An action research methodology underpinned the study. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected in eight nursing homes before, during and after the implementation of the care pathway. Findings: Six main barriers were identified: a lack of knowledge of palliative care drugs and control of symptoms at the end of life; lack of preparation for approaching death; not knowing when someone is dying or understanding the dying process; lack of multidisciplinary team working in nursing homes; lack of confidence in communicating about dying; some nursing homes are not ready or able to change. These findings highlight a functional `rehabilitative' culture that may not be so appropriate in the current context of nursing home care, and one that makes implementing an integrated care pathway for the last days of life less straightforward than in other settings. Conclusion: It cannot be presumed that the implementation of a care pathway for the last days of life in nursing homes is straightforward. This study suggests that an action research framework was extremely useful in highlighting and overcoming some obstacles when developing evidence-based practice. Action at both local and public policy level is required to fully address barriers that prevent quality end-of-life care in nursing homes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]