Search

Introduction: Sex as a biologic variable remains largely understudied, even for the most commonly performed operations. The most effective treatment for obesity and obesity-associated comorbidities is bariatric surgery. There are limited data to describe potential differences in outcomes between male and female patients, particularly with regards to weight loss. Within this context, we examined weight loss and complications up to 1 y following sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass within a statewide bariatric quality improvement collaborative., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study among patients who had bariatric surgery. Using a state-wide bariatric-specific data registry, all patients who underwent gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between June 2006 and June 2022 were identified. The primary outcome was percent excess body weight loss and change in body mass index (BMI) at 1 y. The secondary outcome was 30-d risk-adjusted complications., Results: Among 107,504 patients, the majority (n = 85,135; 79.2%) were female and most patients (n = 49,731; 58%) underwent sleeve gastrectomy. Compared to female patients, male patients were older (47.6 y versus 44.8 y; P < 0.0001), had higher baseline weight (346.6 lbs versus 279.9 lbs; P < 0.0001), had higher preoperative BMI (49.9 kg/m 2 versus 47.2 kg/m 2 ; P < 0.0001), and higher prevalence of most comorbid conditions including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and sleep apnea (P < 0.0001). Compared to female patients, male patients experienced greater total body weight loss (105.1 lbs versus 84.9 lbs; P < 0.0001) and higher excess body weight loss (60.0% versus 58.8%; P < 0.0001) but had higher BMI overall (34.0 kg/m 2 versus 32.8 kg/m 2 ; P < 0.0001) at 1-y follow-up. Males had higher rates of serious complications (2.5% versus 1.9%; P < 0.0001), leak and perforation (0.5% versus 0.4%; P < 0.0001), venous thromboembolism (0.7% versus 0.4%; P < 0.0001), and medical complications (1.5% versus 1%; P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: In this study we found that both males and females experienced excellent weight loss with a low risk of complications following bariatric surgery. Male sex was associated with slightly greater weight loss and slightly higher incidence of complications. However, although statistically significant, clinically, the differences in weight loss was not. Due to males having higher prevalence of comorbidities, providers should consider referring males earlier for bariatric surgery which may improve outcomes for this population., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although patients with lower socioeconomic status are at higher risk of obesity, bariatric surgery utilization among patients with Medicaid is low and may be due to program-specific variation in access. Our goal was to compare bariatric surgery programs by percentage of Medicaid cases and to determine if variation in distribution of patients with Medicaid could be linked to adverse outcomes., Methods: Using a state-wide bariatric-specific data registry that included 43 programs performing 97,207 cases between 2006 and 2020, we identified all patients with Medicaid insurance (n = 4780, 4.9%). Bariatric surgery programs were stratified into quartiles according to the percentage of Medicaid cases performed and we compared program-specific characteristics as well as baseline patient characteristics, risk-adjusted complication rates and wait times between top and bottom quartiles., Results: Program-specific distribution of Medicaid cases varied between 0.69 and 22.4%. Programs in the top quartile (n = 11) performed 18,885 cases in total, with a mean of 13% for Medicaid patients, while programs in the bottom quartile (n = 11) performed 32,447 cases in total, with a mean of 1%. Patients undergoing surgery at programs in the top quartile were more likely to be Black (20.2% vs 13.5%, p < 0.0001), have diabetes (35.1% vs 29.5%, p < 0.0001), hypertension (55.1% vs 49.6%, p < 0.0001) and hyperlipidemia (47.6% vs 45.2%, p < 0.0001). Top quartile programs also had higher complication rates (8.4% vs 6.6%, p < 0.0001), extended length of stay (5.6% vs 4.0%, p < 0.0001), Emergency Department visits (8.1% vs 6.5%, p < 0.0001) and readmissions (4.7% vs 3.9%, p < 0.0001). Median time from initial evaluation to surgery date was also significantly longer among top quartile programs (200 vs 122 days, p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Bariatric surgery programs that perform a higher proportion of Medicaid cases tend to care for patients with greater disease severity who experience delays in care and also require more resource utilization. Improving bariatric surgery utilization among patients with lower socioeconomic status may benefit from insurance standardization and program-centered incentives to improve access and equitable distribution of care., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Technical variation exists when performing the gastrojejunostomy during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, it is unclear whether changing technique results in improved outcomes or patient harm., Methods: Surgeons participating in a state-wide bariatric surgery quality collaborative who completed a survey on how they perform a typical RYGB in 2011 and again in 2021 were included in the analysis (n = 31). Risk-adjusted 30-day complication rates and case characteristics for cases in 2011 were compared to those in 2021 among surgeons who changed their gastrojejunostomy technique from end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) to either a linear staple or handsewn anastomosis (LSA/HSA). In addition, case characteristics and outcomes among surgeons who maintained an EEA technique throughout the study period were assessed., Results: A total of 15 surgeons (48.3%) changed their technique from EEA to LSA/HSA while 7 surgeons (22.3%) did not. Nine surgeons did LSA or HSA the entire period and therefore were not included. Surgeons who changed their technique had significantly lower rates of surgical complications in 2021 when compared to 2011 (1.9% vs 5.1%, p = 0.0015), including lower rates of wound complications (0.5% vs 2.1%, p = 0.0030) and stricture (0.1% vs 0.5%, p = 0.0533). Likewise, surgeons who did not change their EEA technique, also experienced a decrease in surgical complications (1.8% vs 5.8%, p < 0.0001), wound complications (0.7% vs 2.1%, p < 0.0001) and strictures (0.2% vs 1.2%, p = 0.0006). Surgeons who changed their technique had a significantly higher mean annual robotic bariatric volume in 2021 (30.0 cases vs 4.9 cases, p < 0.0001) when compared to those who did not., Conclusions: Surgeons who changed their gastrojejunostomy technique from circular stapled to handsewn demonstrated greater utilization of the robotic platform than those who did not and experienced a similar decrease in adverse events during the study period, despite altering their technique. Surgeons who chose to modify their operative technique may be more likely to adopt newer technologies., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To evaluate the extent to which patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (eg, health-related quality of life) are distinct from clinical outcomes following bariatric surgery., Background: Hospital quality measurement often focuses on traditional clinical outcomes (eg, complications). However, PROs may provide a unique perspective regarding performance, particularly for common, low-risk procedures., Methods: We used data from 11,420 patients who underwent bariatric surgery (2008-2012) from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative (39 hospitals). We included both short-term (30-day complication rates) and long-term (1-year weight loss and comorbidity resolution) outcomes. For PROs, we used health-related quality of life assessed by the Health and Activities Limitations Index (HALex) and Bariatric Quality of Life (BQL) index preoperatively and at 1 year. We used multivariable linear regression to determine the association between these PROs and both short and long-term clinical outcomes, adjusting for patient factors and the type of surgical procedure., Results: After adjustment for risk factors and surgical procedure, hospital rankings based on PROs (either the average change in HALex or BQL scores) were not correlated with hospital rankings based on complications. In contrast, both PRO measures were correlated with weight loss. Specifically, the average change in HALex score (R = 0.24, P < 0.002) and average change in BQL score (R = 0.44, P < 0.001) were correlated with hospital average percent excess. One PRO measure-BQL score-was correlated with a decline in the need for medications due to associated comorbidities (R = 0.16, P < 0.01). After accounting for short and long-term clinical outcomes, between 15% and 44% of the variation in PROs remained unexplained at the hospital level., Conclusions: Patient-reported outcomes are not correlated with early perioperative events, but are correlated with measures of clinical effectiveness after bariatric surgery. A comprehensive approach to surgical quality should incorporate both clinical events and self-reported measures of health status throughout the short and long-term recovery period.