Search

Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) indications have expanded during the past two decades to include some morbidly obese patients (body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m 2 ). Few published studies have compared UKA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in this unique patient subgroup with conflicting observations., Methods: We retrospectively compared 89 mobile bearing UKA (71 patients) and 201 TKA (175 patients) performed at a single institution with a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 3.4 years). Demographic characteristics were similar for both patient cohorts. A detailed medical record review was performed to assess the frequency of component revision, revision indications, minor secondary procedures (components retained), and infections., Results: UKA was more frequently associated with clinical failure (29.2% vs 2.5%, P < .001) and component revision (15.7% vs 2.5%, P < .001), TKA was more frequently associated with extensor mechanism complications or knee manipulation (5.5% vs 0.0%, P = .02), and there was no difference in the infection rate (3.0% vs 2.2%, P = 1.0)., Conclusion: Early complications were lower following UKA but were outweighed by higher component revision rates for arthritis progression and implant failure. The study findings suggest that TKA provides a more predictable mid-term outcome for morbidly obese patients considering knee arthroplasty surgery., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several recent studies have recommended offering unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to all patients regardless of body mass index (BMI). The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the proposition that UKA can indeed be offered to the morbidly-obese and super-obese (morbidly-obese, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 ) without compromising results or survivorship., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed mobile-bearing medial UKA procedures performed at our facility from January 2012 to May 2015 with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The study cohort was divided into patients with morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 ) and those without morbid obesity (BMI < 40 kg/m 2 ). A detailed medical record review was performed. Extracted outcome data included the frequency of (1) major revision procedures (components revised), (2) minor secondary procedures (components not revised), (3) infection procedures, and (4) recommendations for revision., Results: We found 152 patients (190 knees) who met criteria for inclusion. Mean follow-up duration was 3.4 years (range: 2.0-6.8 years). Major revision surgery occurred more frequently in the morbid-obesity UKA group (15.7% vs 3.0%, P < .01). Rates of minor secondary surgery and infection were comparable for both groups. Most failures in the morbid-obesity UKA group (85.7%) were due to disease progression involving other compartments or mobile-bearing instability., Conclusion: We found the rate of early major revision surgery in morbidly-obese patients undergoing UKA to be over 5-times greater than that of other patients. Failure was predominantly due to disease progression in other compartments or mobile-bearing instability. Further study is warranted and needed before expanding UKA indications to the morbidly-obese population., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)