1. Prognostic Accuracy of Transient Elastography-Based Predictors in Diabetes and Obesity: A Multicenter International Cohort Study.
- Author
-
Jasty VSJ, Urias E, Le Ashley Tiong K, Aboona MB, Song M, Faulkner C, Devan P, Neo JE, Wijarnpreecha K, Wong YJ, and Chen VL
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Prognosis, Adult, Predictive Value of Tests, Diabetes Mellitus epidemiology, Aged, Singapore epidemiology, Risk Assessment methods, Liver Cirrhosis epidemiology, Liver Cirrhosis diagnostic imaging, United States epidemiology, Elasticity Imaging Techniques methods, Obesity epidemiology, Obesity complications, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease epidemiology, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Background/aims: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is recommended for risk stratification of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). More recently, AGILE3 + and AGILE4 have combined LSM with clinical parameters to identify patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, respectively. However, there are limited data on prognostic performance of these scores in key at-risk subgroups such as those with diabetes and obesity compared to LSM alone., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study including 1903 adult patients with NAFLD from tertiary care centers in the United States and Singapore undergoing VCTE between 2015 and 2022. Primary predictors were FAST, LSM, AGILE3 + , and AGILE4 scores and the primary outcome was liver-related events (LRE). Patients were further stratified by diabetes and obesity status. Prognostic performance was measured using the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (tAUC) at 5 years., Results: In total, 25 LRE occurred and the overall incidence rate of LRE was 4.4 per 1000 person-years. tAUC for predicting LRE in the overall group was significantly higher with AGILE3 + (0.94 [95% CI: 0.90-0.98]) and AGILE4 (0.94 [95% CI: 0.90-0.98]) compared to LSM (0.87 [95% CI: 0.80-0.94]) (p = 0.001 and 0.009, respectively) and FAST (0.73 [95% CI: 0.59-0.86]) (p < 0.001 for both). Similarly, tAUC was significantly higher in those with T2D for AGILE3 + compared to LSM (0.92 vs 0.86, respectively) (p = 0.015) and FAST (0.92 vs 0.73, respectively) (p = 0.008). Among people with obesity, tAUC was significantly higher for AGILE3 + compared to LSM (0.95 vs 0.89, respectively) (p = 0.005) and FAST (0.95 vs 0.76, respectively) (p = 0.0035). Though AGILE4 had a higher tAUC in these subgroups compared to LSM, it did not reach statistical significance., Conclusion: AGILE3 + significantly outperforms LSM and FAST for predicting LRE in patients with NAFLD including in those with diabetes or obesity., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest YJW was supported by the Nurturing Clinician Scientist Scheme, Medicine Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth. VLC was supported in part by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K08 DK132312)., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF