8 results on '"von Elm E"'
Search Results
2. [The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting of observational studies].
- Author
-
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, and Vandenbroucke JP
- Subjects
- Case-Control Studies, Cohort Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Germany, Humans, Publishing standards, Epidemiologic Research Design, Epidemiologic Studies, Observation methods
- Abstract
Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
- Author
-
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, and Vandenbroucke JP
- Subjects
- Case-Control Studies, Cohort Studies, Consensus, Cross-Sectional Studies, Documentation, Humans, Epidemiologic Research Design, Guidelines as Topic, Information Dissemination methods, Observation methods
- Abstract
Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.
- Author
-
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, and Egger M
- Subjects
- Case-Control Studies, Cohort Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Epidemiologic Research Design, Guidelines as Topic, Observation methods, Publishing standards
- Abstract
Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers.This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
- Author
-
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, and Vandenbroucke JP
- Subjects
- Case-Control Studies, Cohort Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Epidemiologic Research Design, Observation methods, Publishing standards
- Abstract
Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed "Explanation and Elaboration" document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
- Author
-
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, and Vandenbroucke JP
- Subjects
- Causality, Consensus, Biomedical Research methods, Epidemiologic Methods, Observation
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Commentary: Assessing the quality of observational studies--or a lesson from Mars.
- Author
-
von Elm E
- Subjects
- Humans, Epidemiologic Methods, Observation, Quality Assurance, Health Care methods
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
- Author
-
Vandenbroucke, J. P., von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., Blettner, M., Boffetta, P., Brenner, H., Chêne, G., Cooper, C., Davey-Smith, G., Gagnon, F., Greenland, P., Greenland, S., Infante-Rivard, C., Ioannidis, J., James, A., Jones, G., Ledergerber, B., Little, J., May, M., Moher, D., Momen, H., Morabia, A., Morgenstern, H., Paccaud, F., Röösli, M., Rothenbacher, D., Rothman, K., Sabin, C., Sauerbrei, W., Say, L., Sterne, J., Syddall, H., White, I., Wieland, S., Williams, H., Zou, G. Y., STROBE Initiative, Altman, DG., Blettner, M., Boffetta, P., Brenner, H., Chêne£££Genevie've£££ G., Cooper, C., Davey-Smith, G., von Elm, E., Egger, M., Gagnon, F., Gøtzsche, PC., Greenland, P., Greenland, S., Infante-Rivard, C., Ioannidis, J., James, A., Jones, G., Ledergerber, B., Little, J., May, M., Moher, D., Momen, H., Morabia, A., Morgenstern, H., Mulrow, CD., Paccaud, F., Pocock, SJ., Poole, C., Rö ö sli, M., Rothenbacher, D., Rothman, K., Sabin, C., Sauerbrei, W., Say, L., Schlesselman, JJ., Sterne, J., Syddall, H., Vandenbroucke, JP., White, I., Wieland, S., Williams, H., Zou, GY., Vandenbroucke, J.P., Altman, D.G., Gøtzsche, P.C., Mulrow, C.D., Pocock, S.J., Schlesselman, J.J., Chêne, G., Röösli, M., and Zou, G.Y.
- Subjects
Research Report ,Biomedical Research ,Cross-sectional study ,Science Policy ,Epidemiology ,Applied psychology ,Public Health and Epidemiology ,Editorial policies (including conflicts of interest) ,610 Medicine & health ,Guidelines as Topic ,Observation ,Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology ,computer.software_genre ,Cohort Studies ,Empirical research ,360 Social problems & social services ,Research Methods ,Internal Medicine ,Medicine ,Generalizability theory ,Publishing ,business.industry ,Clinical study design ,General Medicine ,Checklist ,Observational Studies as Topic ,Critical appraisal ,Epidemiologic Studies ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Research Design ,Case-Control Studies ,Epidemiologic Research Design ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Surgery ,Observational study ,Data mining ,Psychology ,business ,computer ,reporting of observational studies ,Research Article - Abstract
Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research., In this explanatory and elaboration document Mattias Egger and colleagues provide the meaning and rationale of each checklist item on the STROBE Statement.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.