Search

BackgroundThe PARP inhibitor olaparib was recently granted Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accelerated approval in patients with advanced BRCA1/2 mutation ovarian cancer. However, antitumor responses are observed in only approximately 40% of patients and the impact of baseline clinical factors on response to treatment remains unclear. Although platinum sensitivity has been suggested as a marker of response to PARP inhibitors, patients with platinum-resistant disease still respond to olaparib.Results108 patients with advanced BRCA1/2 mutation ovarian cancers were included. The interval between the end of the most recent platinum chemotherapy and PARPi (PTPI) was used to predict response to olaparib independent of conventional definition of platinum sensitivity. RECIST complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were 35% in patients with platinum-sensitive versus 13% in platinum-resistant (p

Background: There is a high unmet need for treatment regimens that increase the chance of long-term remission and possibly cure for women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. In the primary analysis of SOLO1/GOG 3004, the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib significantly improved progression-free survival versus placebo in patients with a BRCA mutation; median progression-free survival was not reached. Here, we report an updated, post-hoc analysis of progression-free survival from SOLO1, after 5 years of follow-up.Methods: SOLO1 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, done across 118 centres in 15 countries, that enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and with BRCA-mutated, newly diagnosed, advanced, high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer with a complete or partial clinical response after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) via a web-based or interactive voice-response system to receive olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or placebo tablets orally as maintenance monotherapy for up to 2 years; randomisation was by blocks and was stratified according to clinical response after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients, treatment providers, and data assessors were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Efficacy is reported in the intention-to-treat population and safety in patients who received at least one dose of treatment. The data cutoff for this updated, post-hoc analysis was March 5, 2020. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01844986) and is ongoing but closed to new participants.Findings: Between Sept 3, 2013, and March 6, 2015, 260 patients were randomly assigned to olaparib and 131 to placebo. The median treatment duration was 24·6 months (IQR 11·2-24·9) in the olaparib group and 13·9 months (8·0-24·8) in the placebo group; median follow-up was 4·8 years (2·8-5·3) in the olaparib group and 5·0 years (2·6-5·3) in the placebo group. In this post-hoc analysis, median progression-free survival was 56·0 months (95% CI 41·9-not reached) with olaparib versus 13·8 months (11·1-18·2) with placebo (hazard ratio 0·33 [95% CI 0·25-0·43]). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were anaemia (57 [22%] of 260 patients receiving olaparib vs two [2%] of 130 receiving placebo) and neutropenia (22 [8%] vs six [5%]), and serious adverse events occurred in 55 (21%) of 260 patients in the olaparib group and 17 (13%) of 130 in the placebo group. No treatment-related adverse events that occurred during study treatment or up to 30 days after discontinuation were reported as leading to death. No additional cases of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia were reported since the primary data cutoff, including after the 30-day safety follow-up period.Interpretation: For patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation, after, to our knowledge, the longest follow-up for any randomised controlled trial of a PARP inhibitor in this setting, the benefit derived from 2 years' maintenance therapy with olaparib was sustained beyond the end of treatment, extending median progression-free survival past 4·5 years. These results support the use of maintenance olaparib as a standard of care in this setting.Funding: AstraZeneca; Merck Sharpe & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Describe rates of prespecified adverse events in patients who switched from olaparib capsules to tablets. Patients & methods: Retrospective, observational cohort analysis using self-controlled, pre–post design. Data on patients with ovarian cancer who switched from olaparib capsules to tablets between January 2015 and February 2019 were obtained from a US claims database. Results: Among all patients (n = 48), proportion with any prespecified adverse event was 45.8% (95% confidence interval: 31.4–60.8) during initial 90 days' capsule use and 35.4% (22.2–50.5) during initial 90 days' tablets use; difference -10.4% (-28.8–9.0). Conclusion: Switching from olaparib capsules to tablets was manageable with no evidence of increased toxicity. This real-world study supports the manageable tolerability of olaparib in women with ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Despite treatment strategies which include both surgery and chemotherapy, epithelial ovarian cancer often relapses and survival rates remain poor. There is therefore a need to identify novel treatment targets and develop approaches that improve outcomes. The role of both germ line and somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the development of ovarian cancer is well established, with mutation in either gene resulting in deficiencies in homologous recombination. Olaparib is an orally active inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) which has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in ovarian cancer. Areas covered: This review focuses on the rationale for olaparib therapy in the context of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer associated with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and summarizes the existing efficacy and safety data in this context. Ongoing phase III trials will be discussed. Expert commentary: Research regarding the optimal use of olaparib in the context of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer associated with a BRCA mutation continues, with evidence for its use as maintenance therapy, treatment as a single agent and in combination with other targeted agents. The mechanisms of resistance require further exploration and it remains to be established whether retreatment or combination with other agents are viable treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Olaparib is the first oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor to be approved as maintenance monotherapy for treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed BRCA-mutated ( BRCAm) serous ovarian cancer. This review provides practical guidance on the use of olaparib (capsule formulation) in the maintenance setting. The article focuses on the key toxicities that can arise with olaparib therapy and recommendations for their management. Nausea, vomiting, fatigue and anemia are the most commonly reported adverse events in olaparib clinical trials and are generally mild to moderate and transient in nature in most patients. Implementation of an effective and timely management plan can control many of the side effects. It is vital that health care providers effectively communicate the potential side effects of olaparib, as well as educate patients on management strategies to combat these symptoms. To this end, realistic expectations regarding the potential side effects need to be set, with an understanding that dose interruptions and modifications may be required to allow patients to continue receiving treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poly-(ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are a class of oral anticancer drugs first developed as "synthetically lethal" in cancers harboring BRCA1/BRCA2 inactivating mutations. In high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancers (HGOC), PARPi demonstrated benefit as maintenance therapy in relapsing BRCA-mutated and non-mutated tumors. Recently, they extended their indications to frontline maintenance therapy. This review summarizes the current place of PARPi (i) as maintenance or single agent in recurrent disease and (ii) frontline maintenance with different settings. We reviewed the course of biomarker identification, the challenge of overcoming resistance to PARPi and future combinations with targeted therapies, including anti-angiogenic, immune checkpoint inhibitors and DNA damage response inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the phase III SOLO1 trial (NCT01844986), maintenance olaparib provided a substantial progression-free survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation who were in response after platinum-based chemotherapy. We analyzed the timing, duration and grade of the most common hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events in SOLO1. Eligible patients were randomized to olaparib tablets 300 mg twice daily (N = 260) or placebo (N = 131), with a 2-year treatment cap in most patients. Safety outcomes were analyzed in detail in randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (olaparib, n = 260; placebo, n = 130). Median time to first onset of the most common hematologic (anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia) and non-hematologic (nausea, fatigue/asthenia, vomiting) adverse events was <3 months in olaparib-treated patients. The first event of anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting lasted a median of <2 months and the first event of fatigue/asthenia lasted a median of 3.48 months in the olaparib group. These adverse events were manageable with supportive treatment and/or olaparib dose modification in most patients, with few patients requiring discontinuation of olaparib. Of 162 patients still receiving olaparib at month 24, 64.2% were receiving the recommended starting dose of olaparib 300 mg twice daily. Maintenance olaparib had a predictable and manageable adverse event profile in the newly diagnosed setting with no new safety signals identified. Adverse events usually occurred early, were largely manageable and led to discontinuation in a minority of patients. • Detailed safety data from the SOLO1 trial of maintenance olaparib in newly diagnosed, advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer. • Maintenance olaparib had a predictable tolerability profile with no new safety signals identified. • Adverse events usually occurred early, were largely manageable and led to discontinuation in a minority of patients. • Risk of MDS/AML with maintenance olaparib in the newly diagnosed setting remained <1.5% with long-term follow-up of 5 years. • The majority of patients were able to remain on the recommended starting dose of olaparib 300 mg twice daily. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are approved as maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer (OC); however, real-world evidence focusing on comparative tolerability and dose modifications is lacking. In clinical trials, the most common adverse events (AEs) leading to dose modifications were hematologic toxicities. We characterized clinical events of interest (CEIs) and dose modifications in a large population of patients with OC receiving PARPi therapy in the USA. A retrospective observational study utilizing claims data from US MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases was performed. Women with OC who initiated a PARPi (olaparib, niraparib or rucaparib) between 01/01/2017 and 05/31/2019 were included. Baseline characteristics were measured during the 6 months prior to starting PARPi (pre-index period). Patients were observed from first outpatient PARPi prescription (index date) until ≥30 days' follow-up. Sixteen pre-defined CEIs (Figure) were identified from claims data based on ICD-9/10 code criteria. Descriptive incidence of CEIs and dose modifications are reported during index PARPi treatment; odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the likelihood of experiencing CEIs. Persistence was defined as having no PARPi treatment gaps of >90 days in patients with ≥6 months' continuous enrollment. In total, 813 PARPi-treated patients with OC were included; 303, 348 and 162 received olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib, respectively. At baseline, patient characteristics and rates of CEI were similar across all groups (mean age: 58.3-59.4 years; commercially insured: 77.9-83.3%; any CEI: 88.9-94.1%; mean NCI-adapted Charlson comorbidity index: 0.7-0.9; systemic chemotherapy ever in patient record: 88.8-90.5%; median [IQR] follow-up: 7.4-9.7 [9.0-11.1] months). Overall, 89.4%, 69.3% and 93.2% of patients receiving olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib, respectively, started at the highest indicated dose. During follow-up, risk of experiencing any CEI was significantly higher with niraparib vs olaparib (OR 3.23 [95% CI 1.89-5.50], P <0.001) and rucaparib (2.07 [1.08-3.97], P <0.05), with no significant difference between rucaparib and olaparib (1.56 [0.89-2.74], P =0.1). A similar pattern was observed with hematologic CEIs (Figure). PARPi dose decreases were observed in 21.1%, 35.1% and 30.2% of olaparib-, niraparib- and rucaparib-treated patients, respectively. The proportion of patients persisting on index PARPi was significantly higher (P <0.05) with olaparib (62.2%) vs niraparib (35.9%) and rucaparib (48.7%). [Display omitted] To our knowledge, this is the largest real-world comparison of PARPi therapy in women with OC. These results suggest differences in the risk of experiencing a CEI, likelihood of dose modifications and ability to receive continuous PARPi therapy between the licensed PARPis. Further research is required to assess the influence of medication adherence on long-term effectiveness and how best to support patients on PARP inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the phase 3 SOLO1 trial, maintenance olaparib provided a significant progression-free survival benefit versus placebo in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation in response after platinum-based chemotherapy. We analysed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and patient-centred outcomes in SOLO1, and the effect of radiological disease progression on health status.Methods: SOLO1 is a randomised, double-blind, international trial done in 118 centres and 15 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older; had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1; had newly diagnosed, advanced, high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer with a BRCA mutation; and were in clinical complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to either 300 mg olaparib tablets or placebo twice per day using an interactive voice and web response system and were treated for up to 2 years. Treatment assignment was masked for patients and for clinicians giving the interventions, and those collecting and analysing the data. Randomisation was stratified by response to platinum-based chemotherapy (clinical complete or partial response). HRQOL was a secondary endpoint and the prespecified primary HRQOL endpoint was the change from baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Cancer Trial Outcome Index (TOI) score for the first 24 months. TOI scores range from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicated better HRQOL), with a clinically meaningful difference defined as a difference of at least 10 points. Prespecified exploratory endpoints were quality-adjusted progression-free survival and time without significant symptoms of toxicity (TWiST). HRQOL endpoints were analysed in all randomly assigned patients. The trial is ongoing but closed to new participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01844986.Findings: Between Sept 3, 2013, and March 6, 2015, 1084 patients were enrolled. 693 patients were ineligible, leaving 391 eligible patients who were randomly assigned to olaparib (n=260) or placebo (n=131; one placebo patient withdrew before receiving any study treatment), with a median duration of follow-up of 40·7 months (IQR 34·9-42·9) for olaparib and 41·2 months (32·2-41·6) for placebo. There was no clinically meaningful change in TOI score at 24 months within or between the olaparib and placebo groups (adjusted mean change in score from baseline over 24 months was 0·30 points [95% CI -0·72 to 1·32] in the olaparib group vs 3·30 points [1·84 to 4·76] in the placebo group; between-group difference of -3·00, 95% CI -4·78 to -1·22; p=0·0010). Mean quality-adjusted progression-free survival (olaparib 29·75 months [95% CI 28·20-31·63] vs placebo 17·58 [15·05-20·18]; difference 12·17 months [95% CI 9·07-15·11], p<0·0001) and the mean duration of TWiST (olaparib 33·15 months [95% CI 30·82-35·49] vs placebo 20·24 months [17·36-23·11]; difference 12·92 months [95% CI 9·30-16·54]; p<0·0001) were significantly longer with olaparib than with placebo.Interpretation: The substantial progression-free survival benefit provided by maintenance olaparib in the newly diagnosed setting was achieved with no detrimental effect on patients' HRQOL and was supported by clinically meaningful quality-adjusted progression-free survival and TWiST benefits with maintenance olaparib versus placebo.Funding: AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer patients (pts) are at high risk of relapse and 5-year survival is 30–50%. Delay of recurrence, prolonged survival and, for some pts, increased chance of cure are goals of treatment in this setting. In SOLO1 (NCT01844986; GOG-3004) pts with advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) who were in response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy derived significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from maintenance olaparib vs placebo (median 41 months follow-up; median not reached vs 13.8 months; hazard ratio 0.30; P <.001; Moore et al. NEJM 2018). We report analyses after 5-years of follow-up (data cut-off [DCO]: March 5, 2020), performed to assess the long-term efficacy and tolerability of maintenance olaparib for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. Pts received maintenance olaparib (tablets; 300 mg bid) or placebo for up to 2 years or until progression. PFS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were investigator-assessed by modified RECIST v1.1. An exploratory subgroup analysis of PFS in higher-risk (stage IV disease, stage III disease with residual disease following primary debulking surgery, inoperable stage III disease, or stage III disease and had undergone interval surgery) and lower-risk (stage III disease without residual disease following primary debulking surgery) pts was carried out. For pts in complete response at baseline, RFS was defined post hoc as time from randomization to disease recurrence (new lesions by imaging) or death. [Display omitted] A total of 260 pts were randomized to olaparib; 131 to placebo (median treatment duration 24.6 vs 13.9 months, respectively). After a median of 4.8 and 5.0 years of follow-up, median PFS was 56 vs 14 months in the olaparib and placebo arms, respectively (Table). In the higher-risk subgroup 42% of olaparib-arm vs 17% of placebo-arm pts were free from progression at 5 years; in the lower-risk subgroup 56% vs 25% of pts, respectively, were progression free at this time point. Among pts in complete response at baseline, risk of disease recurrence or death was reduced by 63%. The safety profile of olaparib was consistent with previous observations. No new cases of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia were reported (previous DCO: olaparib, 3/260 [1%]; placebo, 0/130), and incidence of new primary malignancies remained balanced between arms (olaparib, 7/260 [3%]; placebo, 5/130 [4%]). For pts with a BRCA m and newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, the benefit derived from 2 years of maintenance olaparib was sustained beyond the end of treatment, and after 5 years, almost half of pts were progression free vs 20% with placebo. This benefit was consistent across higher- and lower-risk pts. Over 50% of pts in complete response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy remained free from relapse 5 years after randomization. A total of 5 years of follow-up is the longest for any PARP inhibitor in this setting and no new safety signals were observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]