1. Randomized comparison of daclatasvir + asunaprevir versus telaprevir + peginterferon/ribavirin in Japanese hepatitis C virus patients.
- Author
-
Kumada H, Suzuki F, Suzuki Y, Toyota J, Karino Y, Chayama K, Kawakami Y, Fujiyama S, Ito T, Itoh Y, Tamura E, Ueki T, Ishikawa H, Hu W, McPhee F, Linaberry M, and Hughes E
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Asian People, Carbamates, Cohort Studies, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Interferon alpha-2, Male, Middle Aged, Pyrrolidines, Recombinant Proteins administration & dosage, Treatment Outcome, Valine analogs & derivatives, Young Adult, Antiviral Agents administration & dosage, Hepatitis C drug therapy, Imidazoles administration & dosage, Interferon-alpha administration & dosage, Isoquinolines administration & dosage, Oligopeptides administration & dosage, Polyethylene Glycols administration & dosage, Ribavirin administration & dosage, Sulfonamides administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background and Aim: Daclatasvir combined with asunaprevir is the first all-oral, ribavirin-free treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection in Japan. This study compared the efficacy and safety of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir versus telaprevir plus peginterferon/ribavirin in Japanese treatment-naive patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b., Methods: Treatment-naive patients (20-70 years; baseline viral load, ≥ 100,000 IU/mL) were randomly assigned (stratified by IL28B rs8099917 TT/non-TT status) to receive either daclatasvir 60 mg tablets once daily and asunaprevir 100 mg softgel capsules twice daily for 24 weeks or telaprevir 750 mg (3 × 250 mg tablets) three times daily for 12 weeks and peginterferon/ribavirin per Japanese prescribing information for 24 weeks. A cohort of prior relapsers to peginterferon/ribavirin (20-75 years; baseline viral load, ≥ 100,000 IU/mL) received daclatasvir plus asunaprevir., Results: In treatment-naive patients, sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 in daclatasvir plus asunaprevir recipients was non-inferior (treatment difference, +25.8% in favor of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir) and higher (89.1%, 106/119) than telaprevir plus peginterferon/ribavirin recipients (62.2%, 69/111); sustained viral response was achieved in 95.5% (n = 21/22) of relapsers. Numerically, fewer patients receiving daclatasvir plus asunaprevir compared with telaprevir plus peginterferon/ribavirin experienced serious adverse events (4.2% vs. 5.4%), adverse events leading to discontinuation of any drug (5.0% vs. 62.2%), grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (14.3% vs. 72.1%), rash-related events (0% vs. 13.5%), or anemia (0% vs. 47.7%)., Conclusion: Marked differences were observed in the efficacy and safety profile of daclatasvir in combination with asunaprevir, compared with telaprevir plus peginterferon/ribavirin., (© 2015 Bristol-Myers Squibb. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. and Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF