Search

ObjectiveChemotherapy for high-grade serous ovarian cancers in platinum-sensitive relapse includes carboplatin/paclitaxel, carboplatin/gemcitabine, and carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. According toin vitrodata,BRCAmutated patients are sensitive to replicative stress agents butBRCAstatus is not yet used for the choice of chemotherapy at relapse. Our aim was to assess these doublets according toBRCAstatus in first platinum-sensitive relapse.MethodsThe ESME ovarian cancer database comprises a multicenter retrospective cohort of patients with ovarian cancer treated in French cancer centers between January 2011 and December 2017. Patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancers at first platinum-sensitive relapse who received one of these doublets were included. The objective was to compare progression-free survival of each chemotherapy doublet according toBRCAstatus.ResultsAmong the 10 263 patients in the database, 1539 patients had a first platinum-sensitive relapse: 825BRCAwild type patients (53.6%) and 304BRCAmutated patients (19.8%) (7 patients had a homologous recombination mutation andBRCAstatus was unkown for 403 patients). Median progression-free survival was longer inBRCAmutated patients than inBRCAwild type patients when receiving carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin without maintenance treatment (15.8 vs 11.8 months; pBRCAwild type patients without maintenance, better progression-free survival occurred with carboplatin/paclitaxel (median progression-free survival 14.3 months) than with carboplatin/gemcitabine and carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (9.8 and 11.8 months, respectively; p=0.017). InBRCAmutated patients without maintenance, there was no difference between the three doublets (median progression-free survival of 14.6, 12.0, and 15.8 months with carboplatin/paclitaxel, carboplatin/gemcitabine, and carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, respectively; p=0.40).ConclusionWhile treatment with carboplatin/paclitaxel, carboplatin/gemcitabine, and carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin shows comparable efficacy inBRCAmutated patients, treatment with carboplatin/paclitaxel appears to be more effective than carboplatin/gemcitabine and carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin inBRCAwild type patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancers at first platinum-sensitive relapse.

International audience; Objective > Despite an increasing number of therapeutic indications, there are no specific recommendations regarding the management of PARP inhibitors other than what is specified in the SmPC of each substance. A Delphi French consensus was conducted to establish practical guidelines to meet the needs identified by healthcare professionals and patients. Method > Following the Delphi method, statements to optimize PARP inhibitor management were drafted by a multidisciplinary Steering Committee made up of 17 experts. These statements were submitted to the independent and anonymous vote of clinicians involved in treating patients on PARP inhibitors. Results > This article presents 52 statements on the following topics: initiation and treatment; management of adverse events (hematological effects, gastrointestinal effects, renal effects, pulmonary effects, cutaneous effects, hypertension, insomnia, fatigue, dizziness); special popu-lations and situations; communication with the patient; adherence. Forty-nine statements obtained voter consensus after 3 voting rounds. A hematologist and a nephrologist supplemented this task by drafting an expert opinion on the risk of occurrence of secondary leukemia and nephrological toxicity. Conclusions > This paper is the first Delphi consensus on the practical management of PARP inhibitors. The pragmatic recommendations resulting from this paper should make it possible to manage the side effects of PARP inhibitors better and thus prevent early treatment discontinua-tion and improve patient adherence by preserving quality of life.

PURPOSE In SOLO1/GOG 3004 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01844986 ), maintenance therapy with the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib provided a sustained progression-free survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutation. We report overall survival (OS) after a 7-year follow-up, a clinically relevant time point and the longest follow-up for any poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor in the first-line setting. METHODS This double-blind phase III trial randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation in clinical response to platinum-based chemotherapy to maintenance olaparib (n = 260) or placebo (n = 131) for up to 2 years. A prespecified descriptive analysis of OS, a secondary end point, was conducted after a 7-year follow-up. RESULTS The median duration of treatment was 24.6 months with olaparib and 13.9 months with placebo, and the median follow-up was 88.9 and 87.4 months, respectively. The hazard ratio for OS was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.76; P = .0004 [ P < .0001 required to declare statistical significance]). At 7 years, 67.0% of olaparib patients versus 46.5% of placebo patients were alive, and 45.3% versus 20.6%, respectively, were alive and had not received a first subsequent treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimates). The incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia remained low, and new primary malignancies remained balanced between treatment groups. CONCLUSION Results indicate a clinically meaningful, albeit not statistically significant according to prespecified criteria, improvement in OS with maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation and support the use of maintenance olaparib to achieve long-term remission in this setting; the potential for cure may also be enhanced. No new safety signals were observed during long-term follow-up.

ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy response score according to the number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, on disease-free survival and overall survival, in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer ineligible for primary debulking surgery.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective study included patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent 3–4 or 6 cycles of a platinum and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by complete cytoreduction surgery (CC-0) or cytoreduction to minimal residual disease (CC-1), between January 2008 and December 2015, in four institutions. Disease-free survival and overall survival were assessed according to the histological response to chemotherapy defined by the validated chemotherapy response score.ResultsA total of 365 patients were included: 219 (60.0%) received 3–4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 146 (40.0%) had 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery. There were no significant differences in early relapses, disease-free survival, and overall survival according to the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles. However, regardless of the number cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, persistent extensive histological disease (chemotherapy response score 1–2) was significantly associated with a higher peritoneal cancer index, minimal residual disease (CC-1), and early relapses. Median disease-free survival in patients with complete or near-complete response (score 3) was 28.3 months (95% CI 21.6 to 36.8), whereas it was 16.3 months in patients with chemotherapy response score 1–2 (95% CI 14.7 to 18.0, pConclusionIn our cohort, the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles was not associated with disease-free survival or overall survival. Chemotherapy response score 3 improved oncological outcome regardless of the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles.

There are limited treatment options for ovarian cancer patients with early relapse after platinum chemotherapy. In preclinical studies, we previously demonstrated the promising activity of ABT-737, a Bcl-2/Bcl-xWe conducted a prospective multicenter single-arm phase II study to assess the efficacy of Navitoclax (orally available ABT-737 analogue) monotherapy in 46 heavily pretreated (2-12 lines, median = 4) patients with high-grade serous platinum-resistant ovarian tumors. Navitoclax was administered at the daily dose of 150 mg during a lead-in period (7-14 days) and then increased to 250 mg daily in the absence of dose-limiting thrombocytopenia (G3). Progression-free survival (PFS) based on RECIST v1.1 criteria was the primary endpoint. Analysis of efficacy according to the expression of Bcl-2 family proteins in tumor biopsies was also planned.The 3-month PFS was 22.7% [Navitoclax monotherapy had poor activity that was not correlated with the expression of Bim, Mcl-1 and P-ERK, without unacceptable toxicity.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02591095.

OBJECTIVES: Adding maintenance olaparib to bevacizumab provided a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer in the randomized, double-blind PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial (NCT02477644). We analyzed PFS by clinical risk and biomarker status. METHODS: Patients received olaparib 300 mg twice daily for up to 24 months plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks for up to 15 months in total, or placebo plus bevacizumab. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated PFS in patients classified as higher risk (stage III with upfront surgery and residual disease or neoadjuvant chemotherapy; stage IV) or lower risk (stage III with upfront surgery and no residual disease), and by biomarker status. RESULTS: Of 806 randomized patients, 74% were higher risk and 26% were lower risk. After a median 22.9 months of follow-up, PFS favored olaparib plus bevacizumab versus placebo plus bevacizumab in higher-risk patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.74) and lower-risk patients (0.46; 0.30-0.72). Olaparib plus bevacizumab provided a substantial PFS benefit versus bevacizumab alone in the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive subgroup (higher risk: HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.28-0.54 and lower risk: 0.15; 0.07-0.30), with 24-month PFS rates in lower-risk patients of 90% versus 43%, respectively (Kaplan-Meier estimates). CONCLUSIONS: In PAOLA-1, maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab provided a substantial PFS benefit in HRD-positive patients with a reduction of risk of progression or death of 61% in the higher-risk group and of 85% in the lower-risk group compared with bevacizumab alone. ispartof: GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY vol:164 issue:2 pages:254-264 ispartof: location:United States status: published

Olaparib; Ovarian cancer; Tolerability Olaparib; Cáncer de ovarios; Tolerabilidad Olaparib; Càncer d'ovaris; Tolerabilitat Objectives In the phase III SOLO1 trial (NCT01844986), maintenance olaparib provided a substantial progression-free survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation who were in response after platinum-based chemotherapy. We analyzed the timing, duration and grade of the most common hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events in SOLO1. Methods Eligible patients were randomized to olaparib tablets 300 mg twice daily (N = 260) or placebo (N = 131), with a 2-year treatment cap in most patients. Safety outcomes were analyzed in detail in randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (olaparib, n = 260; placebo, n = 130). Results Median time to first onset of the most common hematologic (anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia) and non-hematologic (nausea, fatigue/asthenia, vomiting) adverse events was

International audience; Background: In spite of the frequency and clinical impact of BRCA1/2 alterations in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (HGEOC), real-world information based on robust data warehouse has been scarce to date. Methods: Consecutive patients with BRCA-mutated HGEOC treated between 2011 and 2016 within French comprehensive cancer centers from the Unicancer network were extracted from the ESME database. The main objective of the study was the assessment of clinicopathological and treatments parameters. Results: Out of the 8021 patients included in the ESME database, 266 patients matching the selection criteria were included. BRCA1 mutation was found in 191 (71.8%) patients, while 75 (28.2%) had a BRCA2 mutation only; 95.5% of patients received a cytoreductive surgery. All patients received a taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy (median = six cycles). Complete and partial response were obtained in 53.3% and 20.4% of the cases, respectively. Maintenance therapy was administered in 55.3% of the cases, bevacizumab being the most common agent. After a median follow up of 51.7 months, a median progression-free survival of 28.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI) [26.5; 32.7]) and an estimated 5-year median overall survival of 69.2% (95% CI [61.6; 70.3]) were reported. Notably, BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated cases exhibited a trend towards different median progression-free survivals, with 28.0 (95% CI [24.4; 32.3]) and 33.3 months (95% CI [26.7; 46.1]), respectively (p-value = 0.053). Furthermore, five-year OS for BRCA1-mutated patients was 64.5% (95% CI [59.7; 69.2]), while it was 82.5% (95% CI [76.6; 88.5]) for BRCA2-mutated ones (p-value = 0.029). Conclusions: This study reports the largest French multicenter cohort of BRCA-mutated HGEOCs based on robust data from the ESME, exhibiting relevant real-world data regarding this specific population.

International audience; Objective. Interval debulking surgery is recommended after 3–4 cycles (standard IDS) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) not able to received upfront complete debulking surgery. However, real world practices frequently report performing IDS after ≥5 NAC cycles (delayed IDS). The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact on survival of the number of NACT cycles before IDS.Methods. We identified from a French national database, women with newly diagnosed EOC who underwent IDS from January 2011 to December 2016. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using Cox model with adjustments for confounding factors provided by two propensity score methods: inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and matched-pair analysis.Results. 928 patients treated by IDS for which our propensity score could be applied were identified. After a median follow-up of 49.0 months (95% CI [46.0;52.9]); from the IPTW analysis, median PFS was 17.6 months and 11.5 months (HR = 1.42; CI 95% [1.22–1.67]; p < 0.0001); median OS was 51.2 months and 44.3 months (HR = 1.29; CI 95% [1.06–1.56]; p = 0.0095) for the standard and delayed IDS groups. From the matched-pair analysis (comparing 352 patients for each group), standard IDS was associated with better PFS (HR = 0,77; CI 95% [0.65–0.90]; p = 0.018) but not significantly associated with better OS (HR = 0,84; CI 95% [0.68–1,03]; p = 0.0947).Conclusions. Carrying IDS after ≥5 NACT cycles seems to have a negative effect on patients survival. The goal of IDS surgery is complete resection and should not be performed after >3–4 NACT cycles.

Contains fulltext : 241226.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: Olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, has previously been shown to extend progression-free survival versus placebo when given to patients with relapsed high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer who were platinum sensitive and who had a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation, as part of the SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21 trial. The aim of this final analysis is to investigate the effect of olaparib on overall survival. METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done across 123 medical centres in 16 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at baseline of 0-1, had histologically confirmed, relapsed, high-grade serous or high-grade endometrioid ovarian cancer, including primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer, and had received two or more previous platinum regimens. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive olaparib tablets (300 mg in two 150 mg tablets twice daily) or matching placebo tablets using an interactive web or voice-response system. Stratification was by response to previous chemotherapy and length of platinum-free interval. Treatment assignment was masked to patients, treatment providers, and data assessors. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival has been reported previously. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint and was analysed in all patients as randomly allocated. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one treatment dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01874353, and is no longer recruiting patients. FINDINGS: Between Sept 3, 2013 and Nov 21, 2014, 295 patients were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either olaparib (n=196 [66%]) or placebo (n=99 [34%]). One patient, randomised in error, did not receive olaparib. Median follow-up was 65·7 months (IQR 63·6-69·3) with olaparib and 64·5 months (63·4-68·7) with placebo. Median overall survival was 51·7 months (95% CI 41·5-59·1) with olaparib and 38·8 months (31·4-48·6) with placebo (hazard ratio 0·74 [95% CI 0·54-1·00]; p=0·054), unadjusted for the 38% of patients in the placebo group who received subsequent PARP inhibitor therapy. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event was anaemia (which occurred in 41 [21%] of 195 patients in the olaparib group and two [2%] of 99 patients in the placebo group). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 50 (26%) of 195 patients receiving olaparib and eight (8%) of 99 patients receiving placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events with a fatal outcome occurred in eight (4%) of the 195 patients receiving olaparib, six of which were judged to be treatment-related (attributed to myelodysplastic syndrome [n=3] and acute myeloid leukaemia [n=3]). INTERPRETATION: Olaparib provided a median overall survival benefit of 12·9 months compared with placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation. Although statistical significance was not reached, these findings are arguably clinically meaningful and support the use of maintenance olaparib in these patients. FUNDING: AstraZeneca and Merck.

Anti-angiogenic rechallenge with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy is effective in recurrent ovarian cancer (rOC); however, data are limited on tyrosine kinase inhibitors after progression on maintenance bevacizumab.In the randomized phase II TAPAZ trial, patients with rOC during the first year of bevacizumab maintenance therapy were assigned 2:1 to either weekly paclitaxel 65 mg/mOverall, 116 patients were randomized and treated: 79 with combination therapy and 37 with single-agent paclitaxel. Median follow-up was 13.1 months. There was no difference between treatment arms in 4-month PFS rate (61% [95% CI, 51-73%] with the combination versus 68% [95% CI, 54-85%] with paclitaxel alone), median PFS (4.9 [95% CI, 4.1-6.1] versus 5.8 [95% CI, 4.8-7.4] months, respectively) or median overall survival (13.6 versus 12.9 months, respectively). The combination was associated with more grade 3/4 toxicities (87% versus 70%, respectively) and toxicity-related paclitaxel discontinuations (22% versus 11%). Pazopanib was discontinued for toxicity in 44% of patients, most commonly for gastrointestinal and vascular events. There were two treatment-related deaths, both in the combination arm (pulmonary embolism and gastrointestinal perforation). At month 4, patient-reported outcomes deteriorated from baseline in the combination arm, particularly for abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms, which showed a clinically important difference versus paclitaxel alone.In rOC progressing during maintenance bevacizumab, adding pazopanib to paclitaxel did not improve efficacy, increased toxicity, and compromised chemotherapy delivery.govregistration:NCT02383251.

Small cell carcinoma of the ovary of hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) is a rare and rapidly lethal disease affecting young women. Cytoreductive surgery associated with chemotherapy followed by a high dose chemotherapy regimen (HDC) demonstrated improved outcomes in a unique prospective and several retrospective studies, and this report aimed to confirm these results in an independent and larger cohort.Between 2006 and 2018, we conducted a multicentric prospective study on 44 women diagnosed with SCCOHT. Patients were treated homogeneously with optimal cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy protocol for four to six cycles (PAVEP). In case of complete response, patients received HDC with stem-cell support, followed by pelvic radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the event-free survival (EFS) in the per-protocol cohort. Secondary analysis explored the effect of HDC with outcomes.Mean age at diagnosis was 33 years old (range 13.8-75.8). 14 patients presented with stage FIGO I, 21 with stage III and 9 with stage IV. Median follow-up was 53.4 months. 38 patients underwent optimal surgery with up to 6 cycles of PAVEP. 30 received HDC, and 21 pelvic radiotherapy. 21 relapses were reported leading to death for 18 patients. Median EFS in the per-protocol cohort was 18.2 months, and 2-year EFS rate was 40%. HDC was significantly associated with better overall survival (p .001). Grades 3/4 adverse events were frequent but, in most cases, manageable, although one grade-5 adverse-event occurred during HDC.Intensive regimen containing multidrug chemotherapy, HDC and pelvic radiotherapy, for the management of SCCOHT, demonstrated encouraging survival and should be proposed for all patients. However, the significant toxicity cost associated is of concern and it should be restricted to expert centers.

Funder: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; FundRef: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004897, Funder: Ligue Nationale de Lutte contre le Cancer (France), BACKGROUND: Uterine sarcomas are a group of rare tumors that include different subtypes. Patients with histopathological high-grade diseases are at high-risk of recurrence or progression, and have a poor prognosis. We aim to explore the most appropriate management in patients with uterine high-grade sarcomas. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of maintenance treatment with cabozantinib in patients with high-grade uterine sarcomas who achieved clinical benefit after standard chemotherapy. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Maintenance treatment with cabozantinib after standard chemotherapy given as an adjuvant treatment after curative surgery, or in locally advanced or metastatic disease, increases progression-free survival compared with placebo TRIAL DESIGN: This is a randomized double blinded phase II trial. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: The study is enrolling adult patients with high-grade undifferentiated uterine sarcomas, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, high-grade leiomyosarcoma, and high-grade adenosarcoma, FIGO (Federation International gynecologue Obstétricien) stage II/III to IV in stable disease or who achieved complete or partial response with doxorubicin ± ifosfamide, who are assigned 1:1 to 60 mg daily cabozantinib (experimental arm) or placebo (control arm), as maintenance therapy. Exclusion criteria include low-grade sarcoma. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Progression-free survival at 4 months. SAMPLE SIZE: The study plans to enroll 90 patients to allow the randomization of 54 patients to detect an improvement in 4-month progression-free survival from 50% to 80% with 15% significance level and 85% power. Estimated dates for accrual completion: recruitment for the trial started in February 2015, and has currently enrolled 83 patients, of whom 35 patients have been randomized. The end of recruitment is anticipated for December 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01979393.

The European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (ESGO) guidelines cover the whole field of common clinical situations in gynecologic oncology. Their elaboration follows a strict process including a systematic review of the literature, the setting up of a group of expert on the basis of scientific production, geographical balance, and multidisciplinarity, and an external review by users and patients. The recommendations for the management of vulvar cancer were elaborated in 2015 and published in 2017. They are available in open access on the ESGO website, and can be incorporated in clinical practice using the free ESGO guidelines smartphone application. This review is a selection of the sections addressing the diagnostic and strategical aspects of the management of lymph nodal disease in vulvar cancer. An additional review of the recent literature published since 2015 has been carried out. The management of nodal disease in vulvar cancer encompasses a diagnostic and a therapeutic component. Clinical and imaging assessment still play a major role, whilst the identification of the sentinel node is currently a mainstay of assessment of the nodal status in early vulvar cancer. The therapeutic component is based on the rational use of full lymph node dissection and (chemo)radiation.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib versus tamoxifen in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer biological recurrence, defined by CA-125 increase without radiological (RECIST criteria) or symptomatic evidence of progression. Patients and methods 116 patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer presenting an isolated increase of CA-125 were planned to be randomized. Regorafenib was administered orally at 160 or 120 mg daily, 3 weeks on/1 week off or tamoxifen at 40 mg daily, until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was Progression-Free Survival, assessed by progression according to RECIST 1.1 or death (by any cause). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival, Best Response and CA-125 response rate. Results 68 patients were randomized. Median age was 67 years (range: 30-87). Primary site of cancer was ovarian for most patients (92.6%). Tumors were predominantly serous / (89.7%), high grade (83.6%) and initial FIGO staging was III for 69.6% of the patients. Most (79.4%) patients were included after the first line of platinum-based treatment. After a median follow-up of 32 months, there was no difference of progression-free survival (PFS) between regorafenib and tamoxifen groups (p = 0.72), with median PFS of 5.6 months (CI 90%: 3.84-7.52) for the tamoxifen arm and 4.6 months (CI 90%: 3.65-7.33) for the regorafenib arm. There was also no difference in term of overall survival, best response or CA-125 response, delay to next therapy. Regorafenib presented a less favorable safety profile than tamoxifen, with grade 3/4 events occurring for 90.9% of the patients compared to 54.3% for tamoxifen. The most frequent were cutaneous, digestive, and biological events. Notably, hand-foot syndrome occurred in 36.4% of these patients. Conclusion Regorafenib presented an unfavorable toxicity profile compared to tamoxifen, with no superior efficacy in this population of patients.

Background Germ cell tumors and sex cord stromal tumors are rare cancers of the ovary. They mainly affect young women and are associated with a high survival rate. The standard treatment mainly involves conservative surgery combined with chemotherapy [bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP)] depending on the stage and the prognostic factors, as for testicular cancers. As reported in testicular cancer survivors, chemotherapy may induce sequelae impacting quality of life, which has not yet been evaluated in survivors of germ cell tumors and sex cord stromal tumors. The GINECO-VIVROVAIRE-Rare tumor study is a two-step investigation aiming to assess i) chronic fatigue and quality of life and ii) long-term side-effects of chemotherapy with a focus on cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders. Methods Using self-reported questionnaires, chronic fatigue and quality of life are compared between 134 ovarian cancer survivors (cancer-free ≥2 years after treatment) treated with surgery and chemotherapy and 2 control groups (67 ovarian cancer survivors treated with surgery alone and 67 age-matched healthy women). Medical data are collected from patient records. In the second step evaluating the long-term side-effects of chemotherapy, a subgroup of 90 patients treated with chemotherapy and 45 controls undergo the following work-up: cardiovascular evaluation (clinical examination, non-invasive cardiovascular tests to explore heart disease, blood tests), pulmonary function testing, audiogram, metabolic and hormonal blood tests. Costs of sequelae will be also assessed. Patients are selected from the registry of the INCa French Network for Rare Malignant Ovarian Tumors, and healthy women by the ‘Seintinelles’ connected network (collaborative research platform). Discussion This study will provide important data on the potential long-term physical side-effects of chemotherapy in survivors of Germ Cell Tumors (GCT) and Sex Cord Stromal Tumors (SCST), especially cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders, and neurotoxicity. The identification of long-term side-effects can contribute to adjusting the treatment of ovarian GCT or SCST patients and to managing follow-up with adapted recommendations regarding practices and chemotherapy regimens, in order to reduce toxicity while maintaining efficacy. Based on the results, intervention strategies could be proposed to improve the management of these patients during their treatment and in the long term. Trial registration This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov: 03418844, on 1 February 2018. This trial was registered on 25 October 2017 under the unique European identification number (ID-RCB): 2017-A03028–45. Recruitment Status: Recruiting. Protocol version Version n° 4.2 dated from Feb 19, 2021. Trial sponsor Centre François Baclesse, 3 avenue du Général Harris, F-14076 Caen cedex 05, France.

Background Diagnostic ionizing radiation is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC). BC risk increases with increased dose to the chest and decreases with increased age at exposure, with possible effect modification related to familial or genetic predisposition. While chest X-rays increase the BC risk of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers, little is known for women with a hereditary predisposition to BC but who tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation. Methods We evaluated the effect of chest X-rays from diagnostic medical procedures in a dataset composed of 1552 BC cases identified through French family cancer clinics and 1363 unrelated controls. Participants reported their history of X-ray exposures in a detailed questionnaire and were tested for 113 DNA repair genes. Logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess the association with BC. Results Chest X-ray exposure doubled BC risk. A 3% increased BC risk per additional exposure was observed. Being 20 years old or younger at first exposure or being exposed before first full-term pregnancy did not seem to modify this risk. Birth after 1960 or carrying a rare likely deleterious coding variant in a DNA repair gene other than BRCA1/2 modified the effect of chest X-ray exposure. Conclusion Ever/never chest X-ray exposure increases BC risk 2-fold regardless of age at first exposure and, by up to 5-fold when carrying 3 or more rare variants in a DNA repair gene. Further studies are needed to evaluate other DNA repair genes or variants to identify those which could modify radiation sensitivity. Identification of subpopulations that are more or less susceptible to ionizing radiation is important and potentially clinically relevant.

Introduction/Background* As stated by ESGO-ESMO, there is a need for indicators of chemotherapy efficacy in ovarian carcinoma patients treated in first-line setting (Colombo et al, IGCS, 2020). The pathological chemotherapy response score (CRS) and the modeled CA-125 KELIM during neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were reported as potential markers. Moreover, changes in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were reported as a prognostic factor (Leary et al, Cancer Immunol Immunother, 2021). We studied the relationships between changes in TILs, the pathological response (pR) and KELIM in patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy +/- interval debulking surgery (IDS) from CHIVA phase II trial. Methodology The patients were enrolled in the randomized phase II trial CHIVA (NCT01583322, neo-adjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel +/- nintedanib, +/- IDS, n=188 patients). KELIM were previously calculated (You et al CCR 2020). The 30 patients with the highest KELIM (very chemosensitive) or the lowest KELIM (poorly chemosensitive) were selected. HE-stained sections from available tissue blocks at baseline and after chemotherapy were analyzed for stromal TILs (sTILs, surface of the tumor stroma occupied by lymphocytes) and intra-epithelial TILs (ieTILs, brisk or non-brisk). The pathological response (pR) was assessed on the most tumoral available tissue block obtained after chemotherapy (good response if extensive fibrous changes with no or isolated tumor cells, or Result(s)* No relationships between KELIM and TILs infiltrates on baseline tumor samples were found. However, strong associations were found between KELIM and TIL infiltrates after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for sTILs (median KELIM for sTILs 0-5% vs >5%: 0.28 versus 1.32, P Conclusion* High consistency was found between the modeled CA125 KELIM calculated during the first 100 days of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and the pathological response, consistent with their values as indicators of the tumor chemosensitivity in first-line setting. Moreover, TILs changes were strongly associated with chemosensitivity, opening hypotheses about the mechanisms of chemosensitivity, and immunotherapy opportunity.

Introduction/Background* There is poor evidence from mostly retrospective series whether co-medication with metformin, statin or beta-blocker have an impact on survival in patients with primary ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of these medications with survival. Methodology Individual data from 3 prospective phase III randomized controlled trials (AGO-OVAR 11/ICON 7, 12, 16) and one phase II trial (AGO-OVAR 15) were pooled and analyzed. Patients were either classified as “ever-user” if the specific co-medication was documented at least once during the trial. In. contrast, “never-users” served as controls. Data were adjusted for potential confounders (age, FIGO stage, histology, residual tumor after surgery, ECOG performance status, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index and assigned treatment within the trial) in multivariate Cox regression analyses. Result(s)* Overall, 2.857 patients were included in the analyses. “Ever-users” were: N=100 patients received metformin (3.5%), N=226 received statins (7.9%), and N=475 (16.6%) received beta-blockers (BB) (N=391 selective (sBB); N=84 non-selective (nsBB)) as co-medication. There were no significant differences regarding the baseline characteristics (histology, FIGO stage, residual tumor after surgery, and chemotherapy-schedule) between “ever- and never-users” except that “ever-users” were significantly older and more obese, compared to controls. Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 18.7 months and 60.1 months, respectively Multivariate analyses for PFS and OS including age, BMI, Histology, FIGO stage, residual tumor after surgery, ECOG performance status and CCI revealed neither a significant impact of metformin on survival of “ever-users”, compared to “never-users” (PFS HR 0.94 95%-CI 0.69-1.29, p=0.7; OS HR 0.82 95%-CI 0.58-1.17, p=0.28), nor for statins (PFS HR 0.98 95%-CI 0.82-1.18, p=0.87; OS HR 0.91 95%-CI 0.74-1.12, p=0.37), respectively. In contrast, “ever-users” of sBB had a significantly elevated risk for recurrence and death in multivariate analysis (PFS HR 1.22 95%-CI 1.05-1.41, p=0.009; OS HR 1.25 95%-CI 1.06-1.47, p=0.009). Conclusion* In this large pooled analysis neither a co-medication with metformin nor with statins had a significant impact on survival in patients with primary ovarian cancer. In contrast, co-medication with a beta-blocker was associated with worse survival. Further studies are warranted to confirm this observation.

Topic: Trials in progress abstract Introduction/Backgroun The preoperative differential diagnosis between a uterine fibroma and a sarcoma is a challenge. Available diagnostic tools are rather inconclusive to distinguish between two pathologies. However, potential accurate diagnostic methods would be of great clinical impact in order to optimize surgical treatment. Methodology A prospective multi-center interventional study will be performed. Ten tertiary French centers will participate in the present study. The overall inclusion study period will be 2 years, overall study duration will be 5 years. Patients greater than 35 years old, diagnosed with suspicious uterine tumor and needing surgical intervention will be included. Uterine tumors will be considered as suspicious in case of rapid tumor growth (≥30% of the maximum diameter in 1-year interval), symptomatic tumors in postmenopausal women, tumors characterized by certain suspicious ultrasound criteria history of treatment with tamoxifen and genetical predisposal to cancer syndromes. Included patients will undergo preoperatively a Vaginal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy (VUGB). There will be two histopathological diagnoses for each patient, the first based on the biopsy specimen received preoperatively (Index test) and the second based on the surgical specimen of uterus resected ‘en block’. These diagnoses will be compared in order to assess diagnostic performance of VUGB. Histological criteria used for both diagnoses will be that of Bell et al which were revised by OMS 2014 classification. Results Our primary study hypothesis is that diagnostic performance of VUBG is capable to differentiate fibroma and sarcoma with a sensitivity greater than 90%. Considering as acceptable a sensitivity of 90% (H0) and excellent a sensitivity of 95% (H1), a sample size of 250 patients would be necessary to achieve 80% statistical power with a 5% type-1 statistical error. Taking into account a potential drop-out rate of 10%, there will needed 275 subjects to be included in our study. Primary study endpoint is sensitivity of VUGB anatomopathological diagnosis. Secondary endpoints include specificity, accuracy Youden’s index, positive and negative predictive values. Conclusion In case VUGB is demonstrated to be effective and safe to make the differential diagnosis, this should permit preoperatively the stratification of patients to either laparotomy for sarcomas or minimally invasive surgery for benign myomas. Therefore, both unnecessary laparotomies and cancer-spoilage by sarcoma morcellations could be avoided at the maximum degree. Disclosures Authors have nothing to disclose

Background Uterine leiomyosarcomas (U-LMSs) and soft tissue leiomyosarcomas (ST-LMSs) are rare tumours with poor prognosis when locally advanced or metastatic, and with moderate chemosensitivity. In 2015 we reported very encouraging results of the LMS-02 study (NCT02131480) with manageable toxicity. Herein, we report the updated and long-term results of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients and methods Patients received 60 mg/m2 intravenous doxorubicin followed by trabectedin 1.1 mg/m2 as a 3-h infusion on day 1 and pegfilgrastim on day 2, every 3 weeks, up to six cycles. Surgery for residual disease was permitted. Patients were stratified into U-LMS and ST-LMS groups. Results One-hundred and eight patients were enrolled, mainly with metastatic disease (85%), and 20 patients (18.5%) had surgical resection of metastases after chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 7.2 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.9-8.2 years], the median PFS was 10.1 months (95% CI 8.5-12.6 months) in the whole population, and 8.3 months (95% CI 7.4-10.3 months) and 12.9 months (95% CI 9.2-14.1 months) for U-LMSs and ST-LMSs, respectively. The median OS was 34.4 months (95% CI 26.9-42.7 months), 27.5 months (95% CI 17.9-38.2 months), and 38.7 months (95% CI 31.0-52.9 months) for the whole population, U-LMSs, and ST-LMSs, respectively. The median OS of the patients with resected metastases was not reached versus 31.6 months in the overall population without surgery (95% CI 23.9-35.4 months). Conclusions These updated results confirm the impressive efficiency of the doxorubicin plus trabectedin combination given in first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced/metastatic LMS in terms of PFS and OS. Results of the LMS04 trial (NCT02997358), a randomized phase III study comparing the doxorubicin plus trabectedin combination versus doxorubicin alone in first-line therapy in metastatic LMSs, are pending., Highlights • Long-term results on PFS and OS of doxorubicin and trabectedin in first-line treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma. • The update confirms the impressive efficiency of the doxo+trab in terms of PFS and OS. • Results of a randomized phase-III study comparing dox+trab combination versus doxo alone in first-line therapy in metastatic LMS are pending.

Prognostic significance of endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is controversial. We compared clinical, pathological, and biological features of patients with endometrioid and serous EOC, and assessed the independent effect of histology on outcomes.We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with EOC selected from the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics OC database between 2011 and 2016. Our main objective was to compare overall survival (OS) in endometrioid and serous tumors of all grades. Our second objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and prognostic features.Out of 10,263 patients included, 3180 cases with a confirmed diagnosis of serous (N = 2854) or endometrioid (N = 326) EOC were selected. Patients with endometrioid histology were younger, more often diagnosed at an early stage, with lower-grade tumors, more frequently dMMR/MSI-high, and presented more personal/familial histories of Lynch syndrome-associated cancers. BRCA1/2 mutations were more frequently identified in the serous population. Endometrioid patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy, with less bevacizumab. After median follow-up of 51.7 months (95CI[50.1-53.6]), five-year OS rate was 81% (95CI[74-85]) in the endometrioid subgroup vs. 55% (95CI[53-57] in the serous subset (p0.001, log-rank test). In multivariate analyses including [age, ECOG-PS, FIGO, grade, and histology], the endometrioid subtype was independently associated with better OS (HR = 0.38, 95CI[0.20-0.70], p= 0.002) and PFS (HR = 0.53, 95CI[0.37-0.75], p0.001).Clinicopathological features at diagnosis are not the same for endometrioid and serous EOC. Endometrioid histology is an independent prognosis factor in EOC. These observations suggest the endometrioid population requires dedicated clinical trials and management.

Purpose: Trabectedin has shown preclinical synergy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical models. Patients and Methods: TRAMUNE is a phase Ib study investigating the combination of trabectedin with durvalumab through a dose escalation phase and two expansion cohorts, soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and ovarian carcinoma. Trabectedin was given at three dose levels (1 mg/m2, 1.2 mg/m2, and 1.5 mg/m2) on day 1, in combination with durvalumab, 1,120 mg on day 2, every 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of trabectedin combined with durvalumab and the objective response rate (ORR) as per RECIST 1.1. The secondary endpoints included safety, 6-month progression-free rate (PFR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and biomarker analyses. Results: A total of 40 patients were included (dose escalation, n = 9; STS cohort, n = 16; ovarian carcinoma cohort, n = 15, 80% platinum resistant/refractory). The most frequent toxicities were grade 1–2 fatigue, nausea, neutropenia, and alanine/aspartate aminotransferase increase. One patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity at dose level 2. Trabectedin at 1.2 mg/m2 was selected as the RP2D. In the STS cohort, 43% of patients experienced tumor shrinkage, the ORR was 7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.2–33.9], and the 6-month PFR was 28.6% (95% CI, 8.4–58.1). In the ovarian carcinoma cohort, 43% of patients experienced tumor shrinkage, the ORR was 21.4% (95% CI, 4.7–50.8), and the 6-month PFR was 42.9% (95% CI, 17.7–71.1). Baseline levels of programmed death-ligand 1 expression and CD8-positive T-cell infiltrates were associated with PFS in patients with ovarian carcinoma. Conclusions: Combining trabectedin and durvalumab is manageable. Promising activity is observed in patients with platinum-refractory ovarian carcinoma. See related commentary by Digklia et al., p. 1745

ObjectiveHigh grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas are associated with a very poor prognosis. Although large surgical resection is the standard of care, the optimal adjuvant strategy remains unclear.MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients with localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (stages I–III) treated in 10 French Sarcoma Group centers was conducted.Results39 patients with localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas treated from 2008 to 2016 were included. 24/39 patients (61.5%) were stage I at diagnosis. 38/39 patients underwent surgical resection, with total hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy completed in 26/38 (68%). Surgeries were mostly resection complete (R0, 23/38, 60%) and microscopically incomplete resection (R1, 6/38, 16%). 22 patients (58%) underwent postoperative radiotherapy (including brachytherapy in 11 cases), and 11 (29%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 33 months (range 2.6–112), 17/39 patients were alive and 21/39 (54%) had relapsed (9 local relapses and 16 metastases). The 3 year and 5 year overall survival rates were 49.8% and 31.1%, respectively, and 3 year and 5 year disease free survival rates were 42.7% and 16.0%, respectively. Median overall survival and disease free survival were 32.7 (95% CI 16.3–49.1) and 23 (4.4–41.6) months, respectively. Medians were, respectively, 46.7 months and 39.0 months among those who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy and 41.0 months and 10.3 months for those who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P=0.012) and disease free survival (P=0.036). Chemotherapy, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics I–II stages, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status 0 correlated with improved overall survival (P=0.034, P=0.002, P=0.006), and absence of vascular invasion (P=0.014) was associated with better disease free survival.ConclusionsThe standard treatment of primary localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas is total hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. The current study shows that adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy appear to improve overall survival. A prospective large study is warranted to validate this therapeutic management.

5572 Background: AcSé Pembrolizumab is a Phase 2, non-randomized parallel arms, multicentric basket trial investigating the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy in different cohorts of patients with rare cancers (NCT03012620). Here we report the results in the rare ovarian tumors cohort. Methods: Selected histotypes were all rare ovarian cancers (incidence < 6/100,000/year). Main inclusion criteria were age > 18, ECOG PS≤1, resistant disease to platinum based chemotherapy, and systematic histological central review by expert pathologist from TMRG network. Patients (pts) received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle for a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate according to RECIST v1.1 at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included best response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The 7 subgroups of pts analyzed were carcinosarcoma (CS), clear cell carcinoma (CCC), low grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), mucinous carcinoma (MEOC), sex cord tumors (SCT), germ cell tumor (GCT), and smarcA4 deficient hypercalcemic ovarian tumor (SCHOCCT). Results: 62 pts from 22 centers, were included from 08/2017 to 12/2020. Median Age was 53.5 years old [36-64]. Median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 2 (range 1-4). The median number of cycles was 8 (range, 1-35) with 44 pts (70.9%) who discontinued the trial after a mean number of 6.8 cycles. There were 2 pts (3.2%) with partial response (PR) at 12 weeks. The best response in ITT was complete response (CR) in 1 patient (1%), PR in 3 (14.3%), and stable disease (SD) in 21 (33.8%). The occurrence of best response depended on the histotype with 1 CR (33%) in GCT (cancerized teratoma), 2 PR (20%) in CCC, and 1 PR (4%) in LGSC. 4/4 pts (100%) reported PD as best response in SCOOHT (Table 1). Median duration of response or stabilized disease was 7.8 months [IQR, 4.1 to 9.0]. At the data cut off, 6-month PFS was 29% [19.7-42.8] and 6-month OS was 77.8% [67.7-89.3] on the overall population. Outcomes differed according to subgroups and will be presented. There were a total of 62 adverse events (AEs) reported in 28 pts. For 5 pts (8%) AEs lead to drug discontinuation. AEs were of grade 1 (n = 9), grade 2 (n = 8), or grade ≥ 3 (n = 45: 42 grade 3, 2 grade 4, and 1 grade 5). Conclusions: Pembrolizumab is safe and well tolerate in this population of rare ovarian cancer pts. AcSé study reports prolonged responses in very selected subtypes of rare ovarian tumor (CCC, cancerized teratoma, and LGCS). Acknowledgements: TMRG (national cancer network dedicated to rare gynecological tumors), GINECO group for partnership, La Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, INCa and MSD. Clinical trial information: NCT03012620. [Table: see text]

e17577 Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) following a first line platinum-based chemotherapy including bevacizumab for HRD-positive advanced ovarian carcinoma (OC) patients (pts) (PAOLA-1 study). We aimed to describe real-world (rw) clinical outcomes in patients with de novo high grade epithelial advanced ovarian cancer (HGEOC) treated with a first-line platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Methods: Using the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) Ovarian Cancer (OC) Data Platform [NCT03275298], a French EHR-derived database centralizing deidentified data of consecutive patients diagnosed and/or treated in 18 French comprehensive cancer centers since 2011, we identified all patients with de novo FIGO stage III/IV HGEOC diagnosed between 01 October 2012 and 31 January 2017, with a documented response to a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and a maintenance treatment with bevacizumab ( PAOLA-like control group population). Data cut-off was 06 August 2020. Endpoints (overall survival, PFS and time to subsequent treatment) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroups were analysed according to the BRCA-derived status. Results: Of 10,263 OC cases in the ESME-OC cohort, 382 patients, with a median follow-up of 47.8 months (CI 95% 44.4-49.1), were analysed. Median age was 61 years (q1-q3: 56-68). 290 pts (75.9%) had a FIGO stage III, 361 pts (94.5%) had at least one surgery, 141 (39.1%) and 210 (58.5%) of them had a primary cytoreductive surgery and an interval surgery respectively. BRCA deleterious mutations were present in 72 pts (22.3%). Median progression free survival was 23.2 months (CI 95% 20.9-24.8) in overall population and 25.3 months (CI 95% 19.7-23.8) in BRCA mutated pts, comparable to the control arm of PAOLA-1 when considering the difference in the PFS definition (from first CT versus from randomization in PAOLA study). Estimated 24-months overall survival rate was 45.7% (95% CI: 40.7- 50.7) and 53.9% (95% CI: 42.4 - 65.5) in BRCA mutated pts. Conclusions: Analyses of our large real-world French ESME-OC cohort are powerful tools to confirm clinical outcomes in HGEOC pts. Our data confirmed the reproducibility of the results observed in randomized clinical trials for de novo HGEOC pts with a documented response to a first line with bevacizumab maintenance therapy.

5554 Background: Antibodies targeting PDL1 or PD1 have been disappointing so far in the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC). A greater understanding of the complex iTME and of the impact of chemotherapy on immune features could uncover promising immune targets. We previously reported that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) increased CD4+ and CD8+ immune cells (IC) and depleted FOXP3+ suppressive T-regs in OC iTME. Here we aimed to describe the expression of PDL1 as well as other co-regulatory molecules in OC and their changes under NACT. Methods: Tumor samples and clinical data were prospectively collected from patients (pts) in the randomized CHIVA trial of NACT +/- nintedanib. Samples were evaluable for immune profiling for 116-124 pts at diagnosis and 89-107 at surgery after 3 cycles of NACT. IC stained for CD4, CD8 were scored as number of IC+/mm². Expression of immune co-regulatory molecules PDL1, TIM3, LAG3 and IDO was scored as percentage of positive cells, and tumors were classified as PDL1/TIM3/IDO/LAG3 positive if > 1% of IC and/or tumor cells (TC) were positive. Highly sensitive pts, defined as objective response to NACT and prolonged median progression-free survival (mPFS > 24months), were compared to refractory pts (progressing during or within 3mo of platinum). Results: As expected, about one third (36%) of tumors were PDL1+ at diagnosis. In contrast, the prevalence of other co-regulatory molecules was higher with 52%, 54% and 93% of tumors being positive for IDO, LAG3 and TIM3, respectively. There was no significant change in PDL1 expression with NACT. However, in paired samples NACT significantly increased IDO and LAG3 expression (p < 0.05), such that 60% and 66% of tumors post-NACT were positive for IDO and LAG3, respectively. TIM3 expression remained high post-NACT with 92% of positive tumors. Highly sensitive tumors (vs refractory tumors) had significantly higher IC expression of TIM3 after NACT (24% vs 6%, p = 0.005), and were significantly more infiltrated by CD4+ (441 vs 228 cells/mm2, p = 0.04) and CD8+ (460 vs 225 cells/mm2, p = 0.045) T cells. Conclusions: Other immune targets beyond PDL1 are highly expressed in OC. In addition NACT appears to prime the iTME by increasing effector T cell infiltration and the expression of other relevant co-regulatory molecules (LAG3, TIM3 and IDO). Future studies could be performed by priming the iTME with NACT and testing novel immune therapies based on target expression in samples obtained at interval debulking surgery.

TPS5614 Background: Besides PARP inhibitors and bevacizumab, there are no approved maintenance therapies after platinum based chemotherapy for patients with a platinum sensitive relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (OC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as single agents have limited activity in OC. One attractive strategy is to turn OC from immunogenic “cold” to “hot” tumors via vaccination with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). OSE2101 is a multiple-neoepitope vaccine restricted to HLA-A2-positive patients (45% of OC patients) targeting 5 TAAs: TP53, MAGE2, MAGE3, CEA and HER2. These neo-epitopes are modified to increase both major histocompatibility complex and the T cell receptor binding affinity. The proof of concept for this approach was recently demonstrated with OSE2101 improving overall survival in a phase III trial in lung cancer progressing after ICI (Besse et al. 2021). The combination of OSE2101 with an ICI may most effectively harness anti-tumor immunity. Methods: TEDOVA is an international randomized open-label, phase II trial evaluating the benefit of maintenance by OSE2101 alone or in combination with PD1 inhibition (pembrolizumab) after platinum based chemotherapy in relapsed OC, previously treated with bevacizumab (if eligible) and a PARP inhibitor (if eligible). Patients (N=180) with CR/PR/SD at the end of chemotherapy are randomized (1:1:2) to: Observation/BSC (Arm A), OSE2101 alone (Arm B), or OSE2101 in combination with pembrolizumab (Arm C). Experimental treatments are continued until progression, or intolerance, for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall response rate, safety, time to subsequent first or second treatment (TTST-1, TTST-2) and overall survival. 180 HLA-A*02 positive patients will be randomized. HLA-A*02 negative patients will be followed in a separate observational cohort. The sample size is calculated to provide 90% power to detect an improvement in PFS for Arm C vs Arm A with a HR of 0.57. Three one-sided Log-rank tests will be considered in a pre-defined sequence: H1: C (OSE2101+pembrolizumab) vs A (BSC); H2: C (OSE2101+pembrolizumab) vs B (OSE2101) and H3: B vs A. The type I error will be α=5%. The type II error will be β=10%. Tests will be one-sided. Status: The TEDOVA/GINECO-OV244b/ENGOT-ov58 trial is currently recruiting. Clinical trial information: NCT04713514.

BACKGROUND: Most women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer have a relapse within 3 years after standard treatment with surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. The benefit of the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in relapsed disease has been well established, but the benefit of olaparib as maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed disease is uncertain.METHODS: We conducted an international, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of olaparib as maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III or IV) high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian-tube cancer (or a combination thereof) with a mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, or both (BRCA1/2) who had a complete or partial clinical response after platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival.RESULTS: Of the 391 patients who underwent randomization, 260 were assigned to receive olaparib and 131 to receive placebo. A total of 388 patients had a centrally confirmed germline BRCA1/2 mutation, and 2 patients had a centrally confirmed somatic BRCA1/2 mutation. After a median follow-up of 41 months, the risk of disease progression or death was 70% lower with olaparib than with placebo (Kaplan–Meier estimate of the rate of freedom from disease progression and from death at 3 years, 60% vs. 27%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.41; PCONCLUSIONS: The use of maintenance therapy with olaparib provided a substantial benefit with regard to progression-free survival among women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation, with a 70% lower risk of disease progression or death with olaparib than with placebo. (Funded by AstraZeneca and Merck; SOLO1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01844986. opens in new tab.)

Objective - We have previously shown that epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and its treatments have negative effects on long-term quality of life (QoL) and fatigue. The present multicenter study investigated the main menopausal symptoms and gynecological management of EOC survivors (EOCS). Methods - 166 patients with relapse-free ≥3 years after the end of treatment attended a consultation with a gynecologist, including a questionnaire related to vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and sexuality, a clinical examination, a blood sample and an osteodensitometry. QoL, fatigue, insomnia and mood disorders were measured with validated questionnaires and correlated to VMS. VMS and QoL were assessed according to natural menopause (NM) or surgical menopause (SM). Results - Mean age at the survey was 62 [21–83] years and stage III/IV (48%). Mean delay since the end of treatment was 6 years. Fifty-nine patients (36%) had SM. Half of patients reported VMS. Seventy-two percent of EOCS with SM had VMS compared to 41% with NM (P < .001). VMS were not associated with poor global QoL, fatigue, insomnia or mood disorders. Two-thirds of EOCS reported a decrease in libido. Patients with SM showed a greater decrease in libido than NM (P < .02). Fourteen percent of them had osteoporosis and 50% osteopenia. Among the 85 patients with VMS, 80 did not receive HRT after cancer treatment. At the time of the survey, only 7 (4%) patients were receiving hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Conclusions - VMS and sexual disorders are frequently reported by EOCS, particularly among patients with SM. Most EOCS with menopausal symptoms could benefit from HRT to improve these symptoms.

Most patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGTCs) have a very good prognosis and chemotherapy provides curative treatment, however, patients with yolk sac tumors (OYSTs) have a significantly worse prognosis. OYSTs are rare tumors and promising results are expected with the use of specific therapeutic strategies after the failure of platinum-based first-line and salvage regimens. We initiated a project in collaboration with EORTC SPECTA, to explore the molecular characteristics of OYSTs. The pilot project used retrospective samples from ten OYST relapsed and disease-free patients. Each patient had a molecular analysis performed with FoundationOne CDx describing the following variables according to the Foundation Medicine Incorporation (FMI): alteration type (SNV, deletion), actionable gene alteration, therapies approved in EU (for patient&rsquo, s tumor type and other tumor types), tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. A total of 10 patients with OYST diagnosed between 2007 and 2017 had a molecular analysis. A molecular alteration was identified in four patients (40%). A subset of three patients (33.3% of all patients) harbored targetable oncogenic mutations in KRAS, KIT, ARID1A. Two patients at relapse harbored a targetable mutation. This retrospective study identifies clinically relevant molecular alterations for all relapsed patients with molecular analysis. Dedicated studies are needed to demonstrate the efficacy of specific therapeutic strategies after the failure of platinum-based first-line and salvage regimens and to explore the potential relationship of a molecular alteration and patient outcome.

The surgical specificities of advanced low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) have been little investigated. Our objective was to describe surgical procedures/complications in primary (PDS) compared to interval debulking surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery, NACT-IDS) and to assess the survival (progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) in patients with advanced LGSOC. We retrospectively analyzed advanced LGSOC from a nationwide registry (January 2000 to July 2017). A total of 127 patients were included (48% PDS and 35% NACT-IDS). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was more severe (p = 0.01 to 0.0001, according to sites), surgery more complex (p = 0.03) and late postoperative morbidity more frequent (p = 0.03) and more severe in the NACT-IDS group. PFS and OS were similar in patients with CC0 and CC1 residual disease after PDS or IDS. Prognosis was poorest for NACT-IDS patients with CC2/CC3 resection (PFS: HR = 2.31, IC95% (1.3–4.58); p = 0.005; OS: HR = 4.98, IC95% (1.59–15.61); p = 0.006). NACT has no benefit in terms of surgical outputs in patients with advanced LGSOC. Patients with complete resection or minimal residual disease (CC0 and CC1) have similar prognoses. On the other hand, patients with CC2 and more residual disease have similar survival rates compared to nonoperated patients. Primary cytoreduction with complete or with minimal residuals should be preferred when feasible.

Introduction. Lymph node metastasis is determinant in the prognosis and treatment of endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) but the risk–benefit balance of surgical lymph node staging remains controversial. Objective. Describe the pathways associated with lymph node metastases in EEC detected by whole RNA sequencing. Methods. RNA-sequencing was performed on a retrospective series of 30 non-metastatic EEC. N+ and N− patients were matched for tumoral size, tumoral grade and myometrial invasion. Results. Twenty-eight EECs were analyzable (16 N+ and 12 N−). Bioinformatics Unsupervised analysis revealed three patterns of expression, enriched in N+, mix of N+/N− and enriched in N−, respectively. The cluster with only N+ patient overexpressed extra cellular matrix, epithelial to mesenchymal and smooth muscle contraction pathways with respect to the N− profile. Differential expression analysis between N+ and N− was used to generate a 54-genes signature with an 87% accuracy. Conclusion. RNA-expression analysis provides a basis to develop a gene expression-based signature that could pre-operatively predict lymph node invasion.

Objectives: Newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer patients (pts) are at high risk of relapse and 5-year survival is 30–50%. Delay of recurrence, prolonged survival and, for some pts, increased chance of cure are goals of treatment in this setting. In SOLO1 (NCT01844986; GOG-3004) pts with advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) who were in response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy derived significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from maintenance olaparib vs placebo (median 41 months follow-up; median not reached vs 13.8 months; hazard ratio 0.30; P Methods: Pts received maintenance olaparib (tablets; 300 mg bid) or placebo for up to 2 years or until progression. PFS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were investigator-assessed by modified RECIST v1.1. An exploratory subgroup analysis of PFS in higher-risk (stage IV disease, stage III disease with residual disease following primary debulking surgery, inoperable stage III disease, or stage III disease and had undergone interval surgery) and lower-risk (stage III disease without residual disease following primary debulking surgery) pts was carried out. For pts in complete response at baseline, RFS was defined post hoc as time from randomization to disease recurrence (new lesions by imaging) or death. Download : Download high-res image (174KB) Download : Download full-size image Results: A total of 260 pts were randomized to olaparib; 131 to placebo (median treatment duration 24.6 vs 13.9 months, respectively). After a median of 4.8 and 5.0 years of follow-up, median PFS was 56 vs 14 months in the olaparib and placebo arms, respectively (Table). In the higher-risk subgroup 42% of olaparib-arm vs 17% of placebo-arm pts were free from progression at 5 years; in the lower-risk subgroup 56% vs 25% of pts, respectively, were progression free at this time point. Among pts in complete response at baseline, risk of disease recurrence or death was reduced by 63%. The safety profile of olaparib was consistent with previous observations. No new cases of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia were reported (previous DCO: olaparib, 3/260 [1%]; placebo, 0/130), and incidence of new primary malignancies remained balanced between arms (olaparib, 7/260 [3%]; placebo, 5/130 [4%]). Conclusions: For pts with a BRCAm and newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, the benefit derived from 2 years of maintenance olaparib was sustained beyond the end of treatment, and after 5 years, almost half of pts were progression free vs 20% with placebo. This benefit was consistent across higher- and lower-risk pts. Over 50% of pts in complete response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy remained free from relapse 5 years after randomization. A total of 5 years of follow-up is the longest for any PARP inhibitor in this setting and no new safety signals were observed.

BACKGROUND Cervical cancer (CC) remains a leading cause of gynaecological cancer-related mortality world wide and constitutes the third most common malignancy in women. The RAIDs consortium ( http://www.raids-fp7.eu/ ) conducted a prospective European study [BioRAIDs (NCT02428842)] with the objective to stratify CC patients for innovative treatments. A “metagene” of genomic markers in the PI3K pathway and epigenetic regulators had been previously associated with poor outcome [2] . METHODS To detect new, more specific, targets for treatment of patients who resist standard chemo-radiation, a high-dimensional Cox model was applied to define dominant molecular variants, copy number variations, and reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA). FINDINGS Survival analysis on 89 patients with all omics data available, suggested loss-of-function (LOF) or activating molecular alterations in nine genes to be candidate biomarkers for worse prognosis in patients treated by chemo-radiation while LOF of ATRX, MED13 as well as CASP8 were associated with better prognosis. When protein expression data by RPPA were factored in, the supposedly low molecular weight and nuclear form, of beta-catenin, phosphorylated in Ser552 (pβ-Cat552), ranked highest for good prognosis, while pβ-Cat675 was associated with worse prognosis. INTERPRETATION These findings call for molecularly targeted treatments involving p53, Wnt pathway, PI3K pathway, and epigenetic regulator genes. Pβ-Cat552 and pβ-Cat675 may be useful biomarkers to predict outcome to chemo-radiation, which targets the DNA repair axis. FUNDING European Union's Seventh Program for research, technological development and demonstration (agreement N°304,810), the Fondation ARC pour la recherche contre le cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of information as to which molecular processes, present at diagnosis, favor tumour escape from standard-of-care treatments in cervical cancer (CC). RAIDs consortium (www.raids-fp7.eu), conducted a prospectively monitored trial, [BioRAIDs (NCT02428842)] with the objectives to generate high quality samples and molecular assessments to stratify patient populations and to identify molecular patterns associated with poor outcome. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2017, RAIDs collected a prospective CC sample and clinical dataset involving 419 participant patients from 18 centers in seven EU countries. Next Generation Sequencing has so far been carried out on a total of 182 samples from 377 evaluable (48%) patients, allowing to define dominant genetic alterations. Reverse phase protein expression arrays (RPPA) was applied to group patients into clusters. Activation of key genetic pathways and protein expression signatures were tested for associations with outcome. FINDINGS: At a median follow up (FU) of 22 months, progression-free survival rates of this FIGO stage IB1-IV population, treated predominantly (87%) by chemoradiation, were65•4% [CI95%: 60•2-71.1]. Dominant oncogenic alterations were seen in PIK3CA (40%), while dominant suppressor gene alterations were seen in KMT2D (15%) and KMT2C (16%). Cumulative frequency of loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in any epigenetic modulator gene alteration was 47% and it was associated with PIK3CA gene alterations in 32%. Patients with tumours harboring alterations in both pathways had a significantly poorer PFS. A new finding was the detection of a high frequency of gains of TLR4 gene amplifications (10%), as well as amplifications, mutations, and non-frame-shift deletions of Androgen receptor (AR) gene in 7% of patients. Finally, RPPA protein expression analysis defined three expression clusters. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggests that patient population may be stratified into four different treatment strategies based on molecular markers at the outset. FUND: European Union's Seventh Program grant agreement No 304810.

Resume Introduction Expression IV est une enquete europeenne evaluant les attentes des patientes suivies pour un cancer de l’ovaire concernant les traitements d’entretien. Methode Quatre cent une patientes francaises ont repondu a un questionnaire anonyme. L’objectif etait d’evaluer les connaissances et attentes des patientes vis-a-vis des traitements d’entretien. Resultats Parmi les patientes, 62 % ont recu une information concernant le traitement d’entretien. Parmi les femmes, 37 % beneficiaient d’un traitement d’entretien. Les attentes des patientes etaient une augmentation des chances de guerison pour 73 % d’entre elles, une diminution de la taille tumorale (36 %), une amelioration de la qualite de vie (35 %) et un ralentissement de la croissance tumorale (27 %). Parmi les patientes, 64 % esperaient un gain de survie sans progression (SSP) de plus de 6 mois. Parmi les patientes, 42 % etaient pretes a prendre le traitement pendant 6 a 24 mois, 20 % jusqu’a 60 mois et 38 % jusqu’a progression. Les patientes de plus de 70 ans etaient moins bien informees (48 % vs 66 %) et avaient moins d’espoir de guerison (60 % vs 77 %) que les plus jeunes. Les patientes en rechute avaient plus d’attentes que celles en remission (diminution de la taille tumorale : 47 % vs 22 %, ralentissement de la croissance tumorale : 37 % vs 15 %, survie sans progression superieure a 6 mois : 71 % vs 53 %), etaient pretes a prendre le traitement plus longtemps (prise du traitement jusqu’a progression : 48 % vs 24 %). Conclusion Il existe un ecart entre le benefice publie des traitements d’entretien dans le cancer de l’ovaire et les esperances des patientes necessitant davantage d’informations.

Resume Introduction Les tumeurs malignes rares de l’ovaire regroupent les tumeurs borderline complexes, les tumeurs germinales, les tumeurs des cordons sexuels et les tumeurs epitheliales rares. Les indications et modalites de preservation de la fertilite, la prise en charge d’une infertilite, les possibilites de contraception et de traitement hormonal de la menopause sont des questions frequentes en pratique clinique. Un groupe d’experts du reseau national dedie aux cancers gynecologiques rares (TMRG/TMRO) associe a des experts nationaux de la fertilite, des traitements hormonaux et de la contraception se sont reunis pour proposer des recommandations nationales. Methodes Un panel de 39 experts de differentes specialites a participe a l’elaboration des recommandations, en suivant la methode DELPHI (consensus formalise d’experts). Apres revue systematique de la litterature, des recommandations ont ete redigees puis soumises a deux tours successifs de cotations. Resultats Trente-cinq recommandations ont ete retenues, precisant les indications de preservation de la fertilite, les situations contre-indiquant une stimulation ovarienne (en preservation de la fertilite ou dans la prise en charge d’une infertilite), les possibilites de contraceptions (notamment hormonales) et de traitement hormonal de la menopause pour chaque type tumoral. De facon generale, une prudence a ete retenue pour les tumeurs potentiellement hormonosensibles comme les tumeurs des cordons sexuels, les adenocarcinomes sereux et endometrioides de bas grade, ainsi que pour les tumeurs borderline avec criteres histologiques pejoratifs. Discussion Dans le contexte d’une litterature pauvre, ces recommandations etablies via consensus formalise d’experts devraient constituer une aide aux cliniciens dans la prise en charge de ces patientes.

Thyroid carcinoma on struma ovarii (TCSO) is a rare ovarian tumour, derivate from monodermic teratomas. It represents about 0.01% of overall ovarian tumours and 5 to 10% of struma ovarii. The diagnosis is histologic and retrospective after pelvic surgery; radiographic imaging being unspecific. Because of its rarity, the treatment of TCSO is not consensual and should be validated in multidisciplinary team involved in rare ovarian carcinoma. The first treatment is a surgical removal, with a laparoscopic approach. A fertility-conservative surgery is recommended for young women. If the tumour is unresectable and/or with metastatic spread, an adjuvant iodine 131 treatment might be proposed after thyroidectomy. Recurrence of TCSO should be taken care of as a thyroid carcinoma with tyrosine kinase inhibitor in case of progressive distant relapse, refractory to iodine 131 treatment. If the recurrence is localised, a complete surgery is the preferred option. There is no gold standard for the follow up.

BackgroundThere is a medical need in platinum resistant ovarian cancer patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) is 3.4 months with chemotherapy and 6.7 months with chemotherapy-bevacizumab combination regimens.1 RECIST overall response rate (ORR) is 11.8% and 27.3%, respectively. The ORR is 15.9% for bevacizumab as a monotherapy with a median PFS of 4.4 months.2MethodsNCT03596281 An open-label phase 1b trial with a modified toxicity probability interval design to evaluate the combination of a flat dose of 400mg bevacizumab for 6 cycles and 200mg pembrolizumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or completed 24 months of treatment in patients with platinum resistant ovarian cancer. The primary evaluation criteria is safety, the secondary endpoint is the efficacy.Results19 patients have been enrolled between January 2019 and February 2021 in 6 French centers. Patients‘ characteristics are reported (table 1). No dose limiting toxicities were observed. Grade 3 treatment related adverse events occurred in 3 patients (i.e. arterial thromboembolism, bowel perforation, proteinuria and sepsis). No grade 4/5 toxicities were induced. A median of 7 cycles (range 3–14) were administered. Median follow-up of patients was 4.1 months (1.8–23). The RECIST ORR was 26.3% (1 complete response and 4 partial responses) (table 2). The disease control rate was 78.9%. The time to progression was not yet reached in 6 patients. The ORR was equivalent whether patients have been pretreated or not with bevacizumab (27.3 and 25% respectively) (table 3). The ORR according to the combined positive score (CPS) for the evaluation of PD-L1 was 50.0% for CPS≥10% (n=4), 30.0% for a CPS≥1% (n=10) and 25.0% for CPSConclusionsA chemotherapy-free regimen combining pembrolizumab and bevacizumab was well tolerated and showed encouraging results in heavily pretreated platinum resistant ovarian cancer patients independent of their previous challenge with antiangiogenic agents.AcknowledgementsFunding for this research was provided by Fondation Cancer du Luxembourg and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.Trial RegistrationNCT03596281ReferencesPujade-Lauraine E, et al. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: The AURELIA open-label randomized phase III trial. J Clin Onco Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 32,1302–1308 (2014).Cannistra SA, et al. Phase II study of bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer or peritoneal serous cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 33,5180–5186 (2007).Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by CPP Sud Méditerranée V institution’s Ethics Board; approval number 18.020 (EudraCT number 2017-004197-34).ConsentWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.