Search

Colorectal cancer (CRC) was the third leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States in 2012, and most patients eventually develop metastatic disease. The use of cytotoxic chemotherapy, the antiangiogenesis drug bevacizumab, and the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab have led to an improvement in median OS for metastatic CRC. Despite this improvement in survival, few agents have activity against CRC. Between 2006 and 2012, the FDA approved no new agents for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). Recently, the FDA has approved aflibercept and regorafenib for use in the treatment of patients with mCRC, and several new agents are currently in development. This paper reviews the use of new agents and new uses for established agents in mCRC.

Targeted therapy is a very exciting era in the treatment of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. After adding cetuximab to conventional chemotherapy and radiation therapy, we are strongly considering the role of induction chemotherapy with the addition of docetaxel. At the same time, other new treatments, especially targeted agents and novel combined regimens, are being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials. For example, several trials are attempting to combine docetaxel and cetuximab in chemoradiation or induction settings. However, in the near future we are likely to see a strong presence of targeted agents that have been found to be not only effective, but also less toxic than conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Their toxicity profiles make them eligible for addition to radiation treatment strategies, as well as other chemotherapy agents, or even for replacing these chemotherapy agents. In this article, we are going to review the indications and current role of cetuximab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (gefitinib and erlotinib), dual inhibitors, IGF receptor inhibitors, as well as other agents that are in development for treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a rare malignancy with an incidence well under one per 100,000 person-years, except for some geographic areas, such as Asia. The prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma is related to its potential for locoregional invasion and metastatic spread. Radiotherapy alone remains the standard treatment for early stages. However, for locally advanced disease, chemotherapy may offer some benefit as a radiosensitizer while treating microscopic spread disease. Chemoradiotherapy is now the standard treatment for locally advanced and/or node-positive patients. Platinum-based therapy is the preferred regimen for this therapeutic approach. In this review, we discuss all treatment modalities available for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, including the standard of care and what therapeutic options could be available for those patients who progress after the standard treatment has been delivered.

Carcinogenesis is a complex pathological process induced by abnormalities in the genome, cell-cycle dysregulation, loss of the programmed cell death process, and upregulation of oncogenic pathways associated with proliferation, migration, and survival, among others. Despite recent advances in molecular and tumor biology in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the introduction of several targeted agents, the disease continues to have a dismal survival. Nonetheless, the future looks promising; conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens in combination with targeted agents have shown better response rates and survival than those seen in the past. These targeted agents have the advantage of blocking or inhibiting specific pathways necessary for tumor growth, proliferation, and metastases, without significantly affecting quality of life by having an acceptable toxicity profile. Thus, these novel agents harbor a hope in the treatment of NSCLC and many other malignant diseases when they can be used either in combination with other chemotherapy drugs in several lines of treatment or as a single agent in maintenance therapy until progression of disease, or even more attractively, in combination with other targeted agents themselves. In this review, we discuss second-line treatments for patients who have NSCLC, including targeted agents and their development in this specific setting as part of our armamentarium in lung cancer.

Lung cancer incidence continues to rise and is the number one cause of cancer death in both men and women worldwide with projected 221,130 new cases and 156,940 deaths in the United States in 2011. 1 Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents more than 85% of the cases with most patients having either locally advanced or metastatic disease at the time of initial diagnosis, and approximately 60%–70% of them have an adenocarcinoma histologic subtype. In the last three years, we have seen several advances in the management of NSCLC, with several factors playing an important role in the treatment decision making process. Maintenance therapy has been added to the algorithm of NSCLC management and Pemetrexed has been studied as single agent or in combination in this setting with recent studies showing safety and improved progression free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS), still the disease for the most part has a dismal outcome. More research work needs to be done to identify which patients truly benefit from these approaches, and to whom we should offer maintenance or switch maintenance vs. close observation.

Breast cancer remains the second leading cause of malignancy-related death in women in the United States, regardless of advances in novel therapeutic agents. High priority should be emphasized in research aimed at the study of pharmacological and natural compounds that may potentially prevent the development of breast cancer in susceptible patients. Among the known selective estrogen receptor modulators with proven chemopreventive effects, raloxifene has been studied in a number of clinical trials evaluating this drug for the prevention of osteoporosis and coronary heart disease. The MORE and CORE trials had as a primary end point the efficacy of raloxifene in the treatment of women with osteoporosis. These studies showed that raloxifene reduced the risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. However, the STAR trial showed no significant difference between raloxifene and tamoxifen recipients in the incidence of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women at high risk of invasive breast cancer. This review focuses on the chemopreventive properties of raloxifene and the clinical trials that have proven its efficacy as a chemopreventive agent in invasive breast cancer.