4 results on '"Boveldt, Nienke"'
Search Results
2. Adoptation of an evidence-based clinical practice guideline in cancer pain management by medical oncologists: a case vignette study.
- Author
-
Boveldt, Nienke, Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra, Besse, Kees, Vissers, Kris, and Engels, Yvonne
- Subjects
- *
EVIDENCE-based medicine , *CANCER pain treatment , *PAIN management , *CANCER patients , *PANCREATIC cancer , *PHYSICIAN practice patterns , *ONCOLOGISTS , *CROSS-sectional method - Abstract
Purpose: Pain is a major problem in all cancer stages. Cancer pain guidelines are developed to improve management of pain. It is unclear whether these recommendations are applied in daily practice. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess medical oncologists' adherence to an evidence-based clinical practice guideline in cancer pain management and their confidence in treatment choices. Methods: A cross-sectional case vignette survey describing a patient with intractable pancreatic cancer and pain was sent to all 268 medical oncologists registered at the Netherlands Association of Internal Medicine. Descriptive statistics were conducted. Results: Sixty-three of 268 medical oncologists (24 %) completed the survey. Adherence to the different recommendations of the guideline ranged from 18 to 100 %. Confidence for treatment choice ranged from 5.6 to 9.5 on a Numeric Rating Scale (0-10). Most of the responding oncologists (94 %) adhered to prescribing paracetamol as first-line pain treatment, and all prescribed a laxative in combination with opioids to prevent constipation. However, only 24 % of the respondents adhered to the guideline when first-line treatment had insufficient effect. Additionally, only 35 % adhered to the recommendation for insomnia treatment providing psychosocial support or using a multidimensional pain questionnaire besides pharmacological treatment. Finally, only 18 % adhered to the recommendation to perform a multidimensional pain assessment when disease worsens and pain increases. Conclusions: The recommendations of the guideline have been partly adopted in cancer pain practice by medical oncologists. Particularly, pain assessment is not applied in the recommended manner. Therefore, implementation strategies should focus on adequate pain assessment in patients with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Pain is not Systematically Registered in Dutch Medical Oncology Outpatients.
- Author
-
Boveldt, Nienke D., Vernooij‐Dassen, Myrra J.F.J., Jansen, Anne, Vissers, Kris C.P., and Engels, Yvonne
- Subjects
- *
HOSPITALS , *CANCER patients , *CANCER pain , *CHI-squared test , *CONFIDENCE intervals , *REPORTING of diseases , *FISHER exact test , *HOSPITAL wards , *MEDICAL cooperation , *ONCOLOGY , *PROBABILITY theory , *RESEARCH , *RESEARCH funding , *PAIN measurement , *VISUAL analog scale , *DATA analysis software , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *ODDS ratio - Abstract
Background Systematic pain registration and assessment with a visual analog scale ( VAS) or numeric rating scale ( NRS) at each visit are key recommendations in one of the most recent guidelines on cancer pain management. It is unclear whether this recommendation is applied. Objectives The aim was to explore registration of pain in medical records of patients visiting the medical oncology outpatient clinic. Methods In a multicenter study in six Dutch hospitals, data were extracted from medical records of 380 outpatients with cancer. Data of the first three visits at the outpatient clinic were studied. Descriptive statistics were conducted. Results In 23% of all 987 visits at the outpatient clinic, pain or absence of pain was registered, and in an additional 15%, a nonspecific symptom description was given. Regarding all other visits, (62%) pain or absence of pain was not documented at all. Pain measurement using a VAS or NRS was documented in only one visit. Pain was more often registered in medical records of patients with metastasis, as well as in those of patients with urogenital tumors. Conclusion Pain in medical oncology outpatients is not systematically registered in their medical records. With one exception, pain was not registered with a VAS or NRS. Yet, registration and assessment of pain to monitor pain are essential to evaluate and adapt pain treatment over time. Pain registration has not improved since 2001 and therefore implementing the recommendations regarding systematic monitoring of pain is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Patient empowerment in cancer pain management: an integrative literature review.
- Author
-
Boveldt, Nienke, Vernooij‐Dassen, Myrra, Leppink, Irene, Samwel, Han, Vissers, Kris, and Engels, Yvonne
- Subjects
- *
PAIN management , *CANCER pain treatment , *CANCER patients , *SELF-efficacy , *PSYCHO-oncology - Abstract
Objective More than 50% of patients with cancer experience pain. Patient empowerment has been highlighted as central to success in pain management. Up to now, no clear model for this patient group exists, yet several strategies to empower patients have been used in clinical practice. This review examines how empowerment or related concepts have been described in relation to pain management in patients with cancer. With the help of a conceptual model, recommendations for clinical practice are provided. Methods An integrative review was conducted, using the databases PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO. We evaluated papers discussing empowerment or related concepts in relation to pain management in patients with cancer. We analyzed the term 'empowerment' semantically. Results From a total of 5984 identified papers, 34 were included for analysis. Empowerment has been described with the concepts self-efficacy, active patient participation, increasing abilities, and control of life. Most papers focus on pain treatment induced by the professional caregiver or on the active involvement of the patient, and not on the combination of both. The following elements of empowerment could be discriminated: role of the patient, role of the professional, resources, self-efficacy, active coping, and shared decision making. Conclusions On the basis of these findings, we propose a conceptual model to empower patients in controlling cancer pain. We recommend focusing on pain treatment given by the professional, on the active involvement of the patient, and on the interaction of both. Our model might also be useful for other patient groups or specific contexts, especially in symptom management. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.