Search

Objectives Soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP) and fibulin-3 serum levels may serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Here, we evaluate these markers for correlation to tumor volume, prognosis and response assessment in a clinical trial of immunogene therapy in combination with chemotherapy. Materials and methods Serial serum levels of SMRP and fibulin-3 were measured in adult patients with biopsy-proven MPM enrolled in two prospective clinical trials. Pre-therapy computed tomography (CT) measurements of tumor burden were calculated and correlated with pre-therapy serum SMRP and fibulin-3 levels in these two trials. Serological data were also correlated with radiological assessment of response using Modified RECIST criteria over the first 6 months of intrapleural delivery of adenovirus-IFN alpha (Ad.IFN-α) combined with chemotherapy. Results A cohort of 58 patients who enrolled in either a photodynamic therapy trial or immunotherapy clinical trial had available imaging and SMRP serological data for analysis of whom 45 patients had serological fibulin-3 data. The cohort mean total tumor volume was 387 cm3 (STD 561 cm3). Serum SMRP was detectable in 57 of 58 patients (mean 3.8 nM, STD 6.0). Serum fibulin-3 was detected in 44 of 45 patients (mean 23 ng/mL, STD 14). At pre-therapy baseline in these two trials, there was a strong correlation between tumor volume and serum SMRP levels (r = 0.61, p Conclusions Although our data show correlations of SMRP and fibulin-3 with initial tumor volumes as measured by CT scanning, the use of SMRP and fibulin-3 as serological biomarkers in the immunotherapy trial were not useful in following tumor response longitudinally.

Lymph node (LN) involvement is a poor prognostic factor for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, to our knowledge, postresection outcomes of node-negative (cN0/pN0), occult pathologic nodal disease (cN0/pN+), and clinical node-positive disease (cN+) have not been compared to date.The National Cancer Data Base was queried for newly diagnosed, resected MPM with known clinical/pathologic LN information. Three cohorts were compared: cN0/pN0, cN+, and cN0/pN+. Multivariable logistic regression examined predictors of pathologic nodal upstaging. Kaplan-Meier analysis with propensity matching assessed overall survival (OS); multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling examined predictors thereof.Of 1369 patients, 687 (50%) had cN0/pN0, 457 (33%) cN+, and 225 (16%) cN0/pN+ disease. Median follow-up was 29 months. In patients with cN0 disease, factors associated with pathologic nodal upstaging were younger age, greater number of examined LNs, and nonsarcomatoid histology (P .05 for all). Relative to pN0 cases, occult LN involvement (65% being pN2) was associated with 51% higher hazard of mortality on multivariate analysis (P = .005). Following propensity matching, the OS of cN0/pN+ was similar to cN+ cases (P = .281). On multivariate analysis, the number of involved LNs (continuous variable, P = .013), but not nodal tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) classification or LN ratio (P.05 for both), was associated with OS.Detecting occult nodal disease during resection for cN0 MPM is associated with poorer prognosis, with similar survival as cN+ cases, underscoring the importance of routine preoperative pathologic nodal assessment for potentially resectable MPM. The number of involved LNs (rather than current location-based classification) may provide more robust prognostic stratification for future TNM staging.

Nodal involvement in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a poor prognostic factor, and management remains highly debated. Because there are no prospective trials for this population, this investigation addressed a major knowledge gap by examining national practice patterns as well as survival outcomes. The National Cancer Database was queried for newly diagnosed cN1-3M0 MPM. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with administering surgery. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed overall survival (OS); multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling examined factors associated with OS. No statistical intergroup comparisons were made herein. This was primarily owing to undeniable selection biases in these heterogeneous datasets; the presence of incomplete and inadequately granular clinical information (eg, intent and selection of treatment, preoperative assessment) cannot be accounted for by propensity matching or other such algorithms, thus potentially leading to misinterpretation. Of 2548 patients, 20%, 70%, and 9% had N1, N2, and N3 disease, respectively. Overall, 13% received surgery/chemotherapy, 47% underwent chemotherapy alone, 30% were observed, and 5% received resection without chemotherapy (5% had unknown treatment information). The median OS for all patients was 9.2 months. Relative to N1 cases, N2+ subjects were less likely to undergo resection, and they also experienced lower OS (P0.05 for both). The median OS in N1, N2, and N3 patients was 10.0, 9.1, and 8.5 months, respectively. In summary, nodal status is a prognostic factor in cN+ MPM. Expected outcomes for the overall population and by nodal classification are described, which should be considered when patients and multidisciplinary providers jointly weigh management options. Careful patient selection in this population is necessary, encompassing factors such as histology, age, performance status, and location(s) of nodal burden.

This article is a joint effort arising from a task force formed at a National Cancer Institute-International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer-Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation Mesothelioma Clinical Trials Planning Meeting, held at the NIH in March 2017. Malignant pleural mesothelioma remains one of the most virulent and recalcitrant malignancies, still considered incurable, and in desperate need of clinical trials in order to make progress for our patients. Although not standard of care, there is compelling evidence that a select subgroup of mesothelioma patients benefit from a surgery-based multimodal approach. As it is not possible to achieve a microscopically complete resection with mesothelioma, there appears to be no role for surgery alone. Thus, it is anticipated that significant strides in the surgery-based treatment of this cancer will require trials that determine which complementary treatments best augment the cytoreductive efficacy of surgery. Although lung-sacrificing surgery for mesothelioma is fairly standardized, approaches to lung-sparing surgery are highly variable and lung sparing surgery is emerging internationally as the dominant extirpative procedure for this cancer. It is not currently possible to rigorously assess the contribution of the adjuvant treatments combined with surgery because of the variability in procedures used to debulk this cancer, the extreme variability of the cancer itself, the variability in patient selection, the variability in treatment of the inevitable recurrence, and even the variability in follow up schedules. This article is an effort to address these problems by suggesting a more uniform approach to the surgical procedure and also proposing a series of data collection forms that could be adopted immediately, with any eye toward collecting the information that will be necessary to facilitate patient selection and determine which aspects of mesothelioma surgery can and should be standardized - with the goal being extension of life while maintaining quality of life as an equal priority. Furthermore, a completely original contribution in this manuscript is the proposal of a grading system that takes the information from the surgical procedure data forms and generates a completeness of resection score. This is the initial effort to establish a common denominator for mesothelioma surgery that will allow for more accurate comparison between surgical series and better assessment of the impact of the treatments combined with surgery.

The median age at diagnosis for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is approximately 72 years. Elderly patients pose unique management challenges because of the increased risk of therapy-related toxicities and mortality. Because there are no high-volume retrospective studies, prospective trials, or dedicated treatment recommendations for this population, this investigation addresses a major knowledge gap by examining national practice patterns and postoperative/survival outcomes in elderly MPM patients. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients aged ≥ 80 years with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic MPM. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with observation and surgery. Kaplan–Meier analysis assessed overall survival (OS), and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling examined factors associated with OS. Survival was also calculated following propensity matching. Additionally, postoperative outcomes were evaluated in surgical patients. Of 4526 patients, 2% received surgery and chemotherapy, 22% underwent chemotherapy alone, and 63% were observed. Respective median OS was 12.2, 9.5, and 4.1 months (p

Background Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is standard for medically inoperable stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is emerging as a surgical alternative in operable patients. However, limited long-term outcomes data exist, particularly according to operability. We hypothesized long-term local control (LC) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) would not differ by fractionation schedule, tumor size or location, or operability status, but overall survival (OS) would be higher for operable patients. Patients and Methods All consecutive patients with stage I (cT1-2aN0M0) NSCLC treated with SBRT from June 2009 to July 2013 were assessed. Thoracic surgeon evaluation determined operability. Local failure was defined as growth following initial tumor shrinkage or progression on consecutive scans. LC, CSS, and OS were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results A total of 186 patients (204 lesions) were analyzed. Most patients were inoperable (82%) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 (59%) or 2 (26%). All lesions received biological effective doses ≥ 100 Gy most commonly (94%) in 3 to 5 fractions. The median follow-up was 4.0 years. LC at 2 and 5 years were 95.6% (95% confidence interval, 92%-99%) and 93.7% (95% confidence interval, 90%-98%), respectively. Compared with operable patients, inoperable patients did not have significant differences in 5-year LC (93.1% vs. 96.7%; P = .49), nodal failure (31.4% vs. 11.0%; P = .12), distant failure (12.2% vs. 10.4%; P = .98), or CSS (80.6% vs. 91.0%; P = .45) but trended towards worse OS (34.2% vs. 45.3%; P = .068). Tumor size, location, and fractionation did not significantly influence outcomes. Conclusions SBRT has excellent, durable LC and CSS rates for early-stage NSCLC, although inoperable patients had somewhat lower OS than operable patients, likely owing to greater comorbidities.

For the 3 histologic subtypes of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)-epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic-the magnitude of benefit with surgical management remains underdefined.The National Cancer Data Base was queried for newly diagnosed nonmetastatic MPM with known histology. Patients in each histologic group were dichotomized into those receiving gross macroscopic resection versus lack thereof/no surgery. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between cohorts; multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed factors associated with OS. After propensity matching, survival was evaluated for each histologic subtype with and without surgery.Overall, 4207 patients (68% epithelioid, 18% sarcomatoid, 13% biphasic) met the study criteria. Before propensity matching, patients with epithelioid disease experienced the highest median OS (14.4 months), followed by biphasic (9.5 months) and sarcomatoid (5.3 months) disease; this also persisted after propensity matching (P .001). After propensity matching, surgery was associated with significantly improved OS for epithelioid (20.9 vs. 14.7 months, P .001) and biphasic (14.5 vs. 8.8 months, P = .013) but not sarcomatoid (11.2 vs. 6.5 months, P = .140) disease. On multivariable analysis, factors predictive of poorer OS included advanced age, male gender, uninsured status, urban residence, treatment at community centers, and T4/N2 disease (all P .05). Chemotherapy and surgery were independently associated with improved OS, as was histology (all P .001).This large investigation evaluated surgical practice patterns and survival by histology for MPM and found that histology independently affects survival. Gross macroscopic resection is associated with significantly increased survival in epithelioid and biphasic, but not sarcomatoid, disease. However, the decision to perform surgery should continue to be individualized in light of available randomized data.

This study of a large, contemporary national database evaluated postoperative outcomes and overall survival (OS) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) by facility volume.The National Cancer Database was queried for newly-diagnosed non-metastatic MPM undergoing definitive surgery (extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or pleurectomy/decortication (P/D)). Patients were dichotomized into those receiving therapy at a high-volume facility (HVF), defined a priori at the 90th percentile of case volume, with all others categorized as lower-volume facilities (LVFs). Statistics included multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, propensity-matching, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. Sensitivity analysis varied the dichotomized HVF-LVF cutoff and evaluated effects on postoperative outcomes and OS.Of 1307 patients, 621 (48%) were treated at LVFs and 686 (52%) at HVFs. HVFs were more often in the Middle/South Atlantic regions, and less likely in New England, South, and Midwest. Notably, 75% of procedures at HVFs were P/Ds, versus 84% at LVFs (p 0.001). Patients treated at HVFs experienced shorter length of postoperative hospitalization (p = 0.035), lower 30-day readmission rates (4.6% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.021), and lower 90-day mortality rates (10.0% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.029). Median OS for respective groups were 18 versus 15 months (p = 0.010), which were not significant following propensity-matching (p = 0.540). On multivariable analysis, facility volume did not independently predict for OS. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the postoperative outcomes and OS findings.This is the largest investigation to date assessing facility volume and outcomes following surgery for MPM. Although no independent effects on OS were observed, postoperative outcomes were more favorable at HVFs. These findings have implications for postoperative management, patient counseling, referring providers, and cost-effectiveness.

Purpose To determine, in a retrospective analysis of a large cohort of stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with curative intent at our institution, whether having a pathologic complete response (pCR) influenced overall survival (OS) or freedom from recurrence (FFR) in patients who underwent definitive (≥60 Gy) neoadjuvant doses of chemoradiation (CRT). Methods and Materials At our institution, 355 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer were treated with curative intent with definitive CRT (January 2000-December 2013), of whom 111 underwent mediastinal reassessment for possible surgical resection. Ultimately 88 patients received trimodality therapy. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare categorical variables. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate OS and FFR, with Cox regression used to determine the absolute hazards. Results Using high-dose neoadjuvant CRT, we observed a mediastinal nodal clearance (MNC) rate of 74% (82 of 111 patients) and pCR rate of 48% (37 of 77 patients). With a median follow-up of 34.2 months (range, 3-177 months), MNC resulted in improved OS and FFR on both univariate (OS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.455, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.272-0.763, P = .004; FFR: HR 0.426, 95% CI 0.250-0.726, P = .002) and multivariate analysis (OS: HR 0.460, 95% CI 0.239-0.699, P = .001; FFR: HR 0.455, 95% CI 0.266-0.778, P = .004). However, pCR did not independently impact OS (P = .918) or FFR (P = .474). Conclusions Mediastinal nodal clearance after CRT continues to be predictive of improved survival for patients undergoing trimodality therapy. However, a pCR at both the primary and mediastinum did not further improve survival outcomes. Future therapies should focus on improving MNC to encourage more frequent use of surgery and might justify use of preoperative CRT over chemotherapy alone.

Mesothelioma is an aggressive and fatal cancer of the mesothelial lining which is caused by asbestos exposure. The current treatment strategy is surgical resection followed by chemotherapy, but this is marginally successful and leads to drug resistant and recurrent disease. Mesothelioma cancer stem cells (MCS cells) comprise an important subpopulation of highly aggressive mesothelioma tumor cells that maintain tumor formation and mediate drug resistance. Our goal is to identify proteins that maintain the MCS cell and non-stem cancer cell survival as therapy targets. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) functions with the MEP50 cofactor to catalyze symmetric dimethylation of specific arginine resides in histones 3 and 4 to silence tumor suppressor gene expression and enhance cancer cell survival. Our studies show that loss of PRMT5 or MEP50 reduces H4R3me2s formation in MCS cells and that this is associated with a reduction in MCS cell spheroid formation, invasion and migration. Additionally, treatment with sulforaphane (SFN), a promising diet-derived cancer prevention and therapy agent, reduces PRMT5/MEP50 level and H4R3me2s formation, and suppresses the MCS cell phenotype. Moreover, forced expression of PRMT5/MEP50 antagonizes SFN suppression of the MCS cell phenotype, suggesting that loss of PRMT5/MEP50 is required for SFN action. SFN treatment also markedly reduces tumor formation and this is associated with reduced PRMT5/MEP50 expression and H4R3me2s formation. These findings suggest that SFN suppresses PRMT5/MEP50 function to attenuate the MCS cell phenotype and reduce tumor formation, and that SFN may be a useful mesothelioma prevention and therapy agent. Citation Format: Geraldine C. Ezeka, Gautam Adhikary, Sivaveera Kandasamy, Joseph Friedberg, Richard Eckert. Sulforaphane suppression of Prmt5 and Mep50 function suppresses the mesothelioma cancer stem cell phenotype [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB192.

Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer that has a poor prognosis. Tumors develop in the mesothelial lining of the pleural and peritoneal cavities in response to asbestos exposure. Surgical debulking followed by chemotherapy is initially effective, but this treatment ultimately selects for resistant cells that form aggressive and therapy-resistant recurrent tumors. Mesothelioma cancer stem cells (MCS) are a highly aggressive subpopulation present in these tumors that are responsible for tumor maintenance and drug resistance. In this article, we examine the impact of targeting YAP1/TAZ/TEAD signaling in MCS cells. YAP1, TAZ, and TEADs are transcriptional mediators of the Hippo signaling cascade that activate gene expression to drive tumor formation. We show that two YAP1 signaling inhibitors, verteporfin and CA3, attenuate the MCS cell phenotype. Verteporfin or CA3 treatment reduces YAP1/TEAD level/activity to suppress MCS cell spheroid formation, Matrigel invasion, migration, and tumor formation. These agents also increase MCS cell apoptosis. Moreover, constitutively active YAP1 expression antagonizes inhibitor action, suggesting that loss of YAP1/TAZ/TEAD signaling is required for response to verteporfin and CA3. These agents are active against mesothelioma cells derived from peritoneal (epithelioid) and patient-derived pleural (sarcomatoid) mesothelioma, suggesting that targeting YAP1/TEAD signaling may be a useful treatment strategy. Implications: These studies suggest that inhibition of YAP1 signaling may be a viable approach to treating mesothelioma.

Introduction The lymphangitic carcinomatosis (LC) pattern of metastatic malignancy is associated with a poor prognosis but is currently not well defined in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Here, we report the incidence and prognostic significance of the radiographic development of LC in MPM following extended pleurectomy/decortication (EPD). Methods Consecutive patients with biopsy-proven MPM undergoing EPD with intraoperative photodynamic therapy (PDT) at our institution from 2008 to 2014 were included in this retrospective study. Patients without available post-surgical clinical or imaging data for direct review were excluded. CT images were reviewed by an experienced, board-certified thoracic radiologist and confirmed by consensus review. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated by Kaplan Meier methodology. Hazard ratios were compared with a cox proportional hazard model. Results 44 patients underwent EPD with PDT during the study period and had available clinical and imaging data. During the follow-up period (median 34 months), 17 patients (39%) developed LC at a median of 10 months after surgery (IQR 5–21 months). 16 of the 17 patients who developed LC (94%) died during the follow-up period, compared to 17 of the 27 who did not develop LC (63%). OS for the LC versus non-LC group was 53% versus 93% at 1 year and 18% versus 67% at 3 years. LC was significantly associated with a lower OS (HR 4.07; 95% confidence interval 1.44–11.48; p = 0.008). PFS for the LC group versus non-LC group was 8 months (IQR 5–9 months) compared to 17 months (IQR 11–24 months) (p Conclusion LC is a common form of failure in MPM following EPD and is associated with a poor prognosis. Thus, further studies are warranted to determine if any evidence of preoperative LC should be an absolute contraindication to EPD and may warrant an EPP or no surgery at all.

Purpose: “In situ vaccination” using immunogene therapy has the ability to induce polyclonal antitumor responses directed by the patient's immune system. Experimental Design: Patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) received two intrapleural doses of a replication-defective adenoviral vector containing the human IFNα2b gene (Ad.IFN) concomitant with a 14-day course of celecoxib followed by chemotherapy. Primary outcomes were safety, toxicity, and objective response rate; secondary outcomes included progression-free and overall survival. Biocorrelates on blood and tumor were measured. Results: Forty subjects were treated: 18 received first-line pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, 22 received second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed (n = 7) or gemcitabine (n = 15). Treatment was generally well tolerated. The overall response rate was 25%, and the disease control rate was 88%. Median overall survival (MOS) for all patients with epithelial histology was 21 months versus 7 months for patients with nonepithelial histology. MOS in the first-line cohort was 12.5 months, whereas MOS for the second-line cohort was 21.5 months, with 32% of patients alive at 2 years. No biologic parameters were found to correlate with response, including numbers of activated blood T cells or NK cells, regulatory T cells in blood, peak levels of IFNα in blood or pleural fluid, induction of antitumor antibodies, nor an immune-gene signature in pretreatment biopsies. Conclusions: The combination of intrapleural Ad.IFN, celecoxib, and chemotherapy proved safe in patients with MPM. OS rate was significantly higher than historical controls in the second-line group. Results of this study support proceeding with a multicenter randomized clinical trial of chemo-immunogene therapy versus standard chemotherapy alone. Clin Cancer Res; 22(15); 3791–800. ©2016 AACR.

On March 28- 29, 2017, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Thoracic Malignacy Steering Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation convened the NCI-International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer- Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation Mesothelioma Clinical Trials Planning Meeting in Bethesda, Maryland. The goal of the meeting was to bring together lead academicians, clinicians, scientists, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to focus on the development of clinical trials for patients in whom malignant pleural mesothelioma has been diagnosed. In light of the discovery of new cancer targets affecting the clinical development of novel agents and immunotherapies in malignant mesothelioma, the objective of this meeting was to assemble a consensus on at least two or three practice-changing multimodality clinical trials to be conducted through NCI's National Clinical Trials Network.

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer of the mesothelial cell layer of the pleura, peritoneum, pericardium and tunica vaginalis. It is typically caused by asbestos, notoriously resistant to chemotherapy and generally considered incurable with a poor life expectancy. Transglutaminase 2 (TG2), a GTP binding regulatory protein, is an important cancer stem cell survival and therapy resistance factor. We show that TG2 is highly expressed in human mesothelioma tumors and in mesothelioma cancer stem cells (MCS cells). TG2 knockdown or TG2 inhibitor treatment reduces MCS cell spheroid formation, matrigel invasion, migration and tumor formation. Time to tumor first appearance is doubled in TG2 knockout cells as compared to wild-type. In addition, TG2 loss is associated with reduced expression of stemness, and epithelial mesenchymal transition markers, and enhanced apoptosis. These studies indicate that TG2 is an important MCS cell survival protein and suggest that TG2 may serve as a mesothelioma cancer stem cell therapy target.

Background We questioned whether the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations for brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with stage ≥ IB non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was high-yield compared with American College of Clinical Pharmacy and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommending stage III and above NSCLC. We present the prevalence and factors predictive of asymptomatic brain metastases at diagnosis in patients with NSCLC without extracranial metastases. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis of 193 consecutive, treatment-naive patients with NSCLC diagnosed between January 2010 and August 2015 was performed. Exclusion criteria included no brain MRI staging, symptomatic brain metastases, or stage IV based on extracranial disease. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed. Results The patient characteristics include median age of 65 years (range, 36-90 years), 51% adenocarcinoma/36% squamous carcinoma, and pre-MRI stage grouping of 31% I, 22% II, 34% IIIA, and 13% IIIB. The overall prevalence of brain metastases was 5.7% (n = 11). One (2.4%) stage IA and 1 (5.6%) stage IB patient had asymptomatic brain metastases at diagnosis, both were adenocarcinomas. On univariate analysis, increasing lymph nodal stage (P = .02), lymph nodal size > 2 cm (P = .009), multi-lymph nodal N1/N2 station involvement (P = .027), and overall stage (P = .005) were associated with asymptomatic brain metastases. On multivariate analysis, increasing lymph nodal size remained significant (odds ratio, 1.545; P = .009). Conclusion Our series shows a 5.7% rate of asymptomatic brain metastasis for patients with stage I to III NSCLC. Increasing lymph nodal size was the only predictor of asymptomatic brain metastases, suggesting over-utilization of MRI in early-stage disease, especially in lymph node-negative patients with NSCLC. Future efforts will explore the utility of baseline MRI in lymph node-positive stage II and all stage IIIA patients.

The black population remains underrepresented in clinical trials despite reports suggesting greater incidence and deaths from locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We determined outcomes for black and non-black patients in a well-annotated cohort treated with either definitive chemoradiation (CRT; bimodality) or CRT followed by surgery (trimodality therapy).A retrospective analysis of 355 stage III NSCLC patients treated with curative intent at the University of Maryland, Medical Center, between January 2000-December 2013 was performed. The Kaplan-Meier approach and the Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze overall survival (OS) and freedom-from-recurrence (FFR) in black and non-black patients. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables.Black patients comprised 42% of the cohort and were more likely to be younger (p0.0001), male (p=0.030), single (p0.0001), reside in lower household income zipcodes (p0.0001), have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status0 (p0.001), and less likely to undergo surgery (p0.0001). With a median follow-up of 15 months for all patients and 89 months for surviving patients (range:1-186 months), median OS times for black and non-black patients were 22 and 24 months, respectively (p=0.698). FFR rates were also comparable between the two groups (p=0.468). Surgery improved OS in both cohorts. Race was not a significant predictor for OS or FFR even when adjusted for other factors.We found similar oncologic outcomes in black and non-black NSCLC patients when treated with curative intent in a comprehensive cancer center setting, despite epidemiologic differences in presentation and receipt of care. Future efforts to improve outcomes in black patients could focus on addressing modifiable social disparities.

Introduction Controversy exists regarding the optimal surgical technique for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We evaluated national practice patterns and outcomes of MPM treated with extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) versus lung-sparing extended pleurectomy/decortication (P/D). Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with newly diagnosed MPM undergoing EPP or P/D. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained clinical factors independently associated with P/D receipt. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall survival (OS) between cohorts; multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate factors associated with OS. Survival was then evaluated between propensity-matched populations. Results Overall, 1307 patients (271 undergoing EPP [21%] and 1036 undergoing P/D [79%]) met the criteria. Patients receiving P/D were older ( p = 0.028), whereas those undergoing EPP were more likely to live in a rural area ( p = 0.044), live farther from the treating facility ( p = 0.039), and receive treatment at an academic center ( p = 0.050). There were no differences between cohorts in 30-day readmission or mortality (all p > 0.05). The median OS times in the EPP and P/D groups were 19 versus 16 months, respectively ( p = 0.120); no differences were observed after propensity matching ( p = 0.540). Conclusions In this largest analysis of its kind to date, findings from this contemporary cohort demonstrate that P/D comprised most surgical procedures for MPM. Procedure type was influenced by sociodemographic and geographical factors, without observed differences in survival or postoperative mortality and readmission rates between techniques.

Purpose: Guidelines for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) recommend definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for cN2-N3 disease, reserving surgery for patients with minimal nodal involvement at presentation. The current literature suggests that surgery after CRT for stage III NSCLC can improve freedom-from-recurrence (FFR) but has not consistently demonstrated an improvement in overall survival, perhaps partly due to the low (45-50.4 Gy) preoperative doses delivered that result in low rates of mediastinal nodal clearance. We therefore analyzed factors associated with trimodality therapy receipt and determined outcomes in patients with LA-NSCLC who were treated with definitive doses (≥60 Gy) of neoadjuvant CRT prior to surgery. Methods and materials: We retrospectively analyzed 355 consecutive patients with LA-NSCLC who were treated with curative intent between January 2000 and December 2013. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival and FFR of patients who were initially planned to receive trimodality treatment but never underwent surgery (unplanned bimodality) compared with those who were never considered to be surgical candidates (planned bimodality) and those who underwent surgical resection after CRT (trimodality). Cox proportional hazards regression with forward selection was used for multivariate analyses, and the Fisher exact test was used to test contingency tables. Results: Patients who received trimodality therapy had a longer median survival than those with unplanned or planned bimodality therapy at 59.9, 20.1, and 17.3 months, respectively (P < .001). The survival benefit with surgery persisted in patients with stage IIIB (P < .001) and N3 (P = .010) nodal disease when mediastinal nodal clearance was achieved. FFR was also improved with surgical resection (P = .001). Race (P < .001), stage (P < .001), performance status (P < .001), age (P < .001), and diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .009) were significant indicators that influenced both the decision to initially choose trimodality therapy at consultation and to actually perform surgical resection. Conclusions: Trimodality treatment significantly improves survival and FFR in patients with LA-NSCLC when definitive doses of radiation with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are employed. We identified important demographic features that predict the use of surgical intervention in patients with stage III NSCLC.

Nodal categories for malignant pleural mesothelioma are derived from the lung cancer staging system and have not been adequately validated. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed a multinational database to generate evidence-based recommendations to inform the eighth edition of the TNM classification of malignant pleural mesothelioma.Data from 29 centers were entered prospectively (n = 1566) or by transfer of retrospective data (n = 1953). Survival according to the seventh edition N categories was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Survival was measured from the date of diagnosis.There were 2432 analyzable cases: 1603 had clinical (c) staging, 1614 had pathologic (p) staging, and 785 had both. For clinically staged tumors there was no separation in Kaplan-Meier curves between cN0, cN1 or cN2 (cN1 versus cN0 hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06, p = 0.77 and cN2 versus cN1 HR = 1.04, p = 0.85). For pathologically staged tumors, patients with pN1 or pN2 tumors had worse survival than those with pN0 tumors (HR = 1.51, p 0.0001) but no survival difference was noted between those with pN1 and pN2 tumors (HR = 0.99, p = 0.99). Patients with both pN1 and pN2 nodal involvement had poorer survival than those with pN2 tumors only (HR = 1.60, p = 0.007) or pN0 tumors (HR = 1.62, p0.0001).A recommendation to collapse both clinical and pN1 and pN2 categories into a single N category comprising ipsilateral, intrathoracic nodal metastases (N1) will be made for the eighth edition staging system. Nodes previously categorized as N3 will be reclassified as N2.

Background: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a rare but deadly malignancy with about 3,000 new cases being diagnosed each year in the US. Very few studies have been performed to analyze factors associated with mesothelioma survival, especially for peritoneal presentation. The overarching aim of this study is to examine survival of the cohort of patients with malignant mesothelioma enrolled in the National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank (NMVB). Methods: 888 cases of pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma cases were selected from the NMVB database, which houses data and associated biospecimens for over 1400 cases that were diagnosed from 1990 to 2017. Kaplan Meier’s method was performed for survival analysis. The association between prognostic factors and survival was estimated using Cox Hazard Regression method and using R software for analysis. Results: The median overall survival (OS) rate of all MM patients, including pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma cases is 15 months (14 months for pleural and 31 months for peritoneal). Significant prognostic factors associated with improved survival of malignant mesothelioma cases in this NMVB cohort were younger than 45, female gender, epithelioid histological subtype, stage I, peritoneal occurrence, and having combination treatment of surgical therapy with chemotherapy. Combined surgical and chemotherapy treatment was associated with improved survival of 23 months in comparison to single line therapies. Conclusions: There has not been improvement in the overall survival for patients with malignant mesothelioma over many years with current available treatment options. Our findings show that combined surgical and chemotherapy treatment in peritoneal mesothelioma is associated with improved survival compared to local therapy alone.

e20064 Background: Malignant Mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive malignancy with survival of 4-12 mo. without treatment and 10% 5-year survival. The response of patients with MM to immunotherapy has increased interest in the tumor immune microenvironment. The purpose of this study was to determine if tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are correlated with survival in epithelioid MM. Methods: Immunohistochemistry was performed on specimens from 27 patients with epithelioid mesothelioma using CD4, CD8, and CD68 antibodies. Infiltrate density was scored (0-3+) by pathologist estimate in intratumoral and adjacent tumoral tissue. ANOVA and regression analysis were performed. Overall survival (OS) for the entire group and time to progression (TTP) for nine patients with known time from surgery until tumor recurrence were also studied as a surgical resection subgroup (SRG). Results: For the small SRG the relationship between (TTP) and TIL score of CD8 at the edge of the tumor was significant (F[2,6]=5.64, P=.042) however TIL score of intratumoral CD8 cell infiltrates and TTP did not demonstrate statistical significance. The relationship between OS with CD8 infiltrate at the tumor edge, for the entire group, approached significance at (F [3,22]=2.93, P=0.056). TTP and OS and the TIL score of CD4, CD68 at both tumor center and tumor edge did not demonstrate statistical significance. Conclusions: CD8+ lymphocytes are an important component of host immune defense against cancer. We found that in epithelioid MM the cellular infiltrate of CD8 lymphocytes at the edge of the tumor (but not with intratumoral CD8) was associated with longer time to recurrence. TTP and OS were not associated with CD4 and CD68 within or at the tumor edge. The role of CD8 T-cells and the quantitative difference between CD8 at the edge of tumor and intratumoral CD8 should be further investigated in order to optimize immunotherapy.

e20066 Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare malignancy with an annual incidence of 3,000 cases in the US and is still considered incurable. The standard of care for this cancer, a combination of pemetrexed and a platinum drug, was established in 2003 as the result of a landmark study that reported a median overall survival of 12.1 months for this combination in patients not eligible for surgery. The aim of the current analysis was to determine if there has been a change in the outcome for this population in the past 15 years. Methods: A PubMed search was performed and 9 prospective, randomized or single arm (minimum n = 50), trials were selected. All studies included patients treated using pemetrexed in combination with platimun as front line therapy in unresectable mesothelioma patients. Average and weighted average OS were calculated and also corrected per the reported odds ratio for survival between the epithelioid and non-epithelioid histologies. Results: The average OS was 12.9 months and the weighted average OS was 13.3 months (range: 8.5 – 16.1 months). The two studies showing the highest median OS (MAPS and LUME-meso) had a higher percentage of tumors with epithelioid histology, which could explain their favorable outcome. Adjusting the average OS using the reported odds ratios for survival between epithelioid and non-epithelioid histologies eliminated the superior outcome in these studies. Furthermore, correcting average survival per the original ratio between tumor histologies for all studies included in the meta-analysis showed an average and weighted average OS lower than 13 months. Conclusions: This analysis strongly supports the contention that survival results for nonoperative patients with mesothelioma should be stratified by histology, epithelioid versus nonepithelioid, similar to the trend in the surgical mesothelioma literature. When factoring in histology, it appears that overall advances in patient care and additional treatments have not significantly changed the overall survival for nonoperative mesothelioma patients in the last 15 years. This meta-analysis underscores the desperate need for new and innovative treatments for this cancer.

Objectives There are 2 main treatment paradigms recognized by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): induction chemotherapy followed by resection (IC/R), and up-front resection with postoperative chemotherapy (R/PC). These paradigms are being compared in an accruing randomized phase II trial. In the absence of such completed trials, in this study we evaluated overall survival (OS) and postoperative outcomes of IC/R and R/PC. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for newly diagnosed epithelioid/biphasic MPM. Metastatic, node-positive, and/or cT4 disease was excluded, along with nondefinitive surgery and lack of chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors independently associated with induction chemotherapy delivery. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to evaluate OS between cohorts; multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess factors associated with OS. Survival was also evaluated between propensity-matched populations. Last, postoperative outcomes were assessed between groups. Results Overall, 361 patients (182 IC/R, 179 R/PC) were analyzed. Temporal trends revealed that IC/R is decreasing over time. Survival of the IC/R cohort was similar to that of R/PC patients (20.9 vs 21.7 months; P = .500); this persisted after propensity matching (20.8 vs 22.0 months; P = .270). However, patients who underwent IC/R experienced longer postoperative hospitalization (median 7 days vs 6 days; P = .001) and higher 30-day mortality (3.3% vs 0%; P = .020). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the only comparative investigation of the 2 major management paradigms of operable MPM. IC/R regimens are decreasing over time in the United States. Although associated with survival similar to R/PC, IC/R might be associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Careful induction chemotherapy patient selection is thus highly recommended.

BACKGROUND The traditional treatment for clearly operable (CO) patients with stage I non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lobectomy, with wedge resection (WR) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) serving as alternatives in marginally operable (MO) patients. Given an aging population with an increasing prevalence of screening, it is likely that progressively more people will be diagnosed with stage I NSCLC, and thus it is critical to compare the cost-effectiveness of these treatments. METHODS A Markov model was created to compare the cost-effectiveness of SBRT with WR and lobectomy for MO and CO patients, respectively. Disease, treatment, and toxicity data were extracted from the literature and varied in sensitivity analyses. A payer (Medicare) perspective was used. RESULTS In the base case, SBRT (MO cohort), SBRT (CO cohort), WR, and lobectomy were associated with mean cost and quality-adjusted life expectancies of $42,094/8.03, $40,107/8.21, $51,487/7.93, and $49,093/8.89, respectively. In MO patients, SBRT was the dominant and thus cost-effective strategy. This result was confirmed in most deterministic sensitivity analyses as well as probabilistic sensitivity analysis, in which SBRT was most likely cost-effective up to a willingness-to-pay of more than $500,000/quality-adjusted life year. For CO patients, lobectomy was the cost-effective treatment option in the base case (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $13,216/quality-adjusted life year) and in nearly every sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS SBRT was nearly always the most cost-effective treatment strategy for MO patients with stage I NSCLC. In contrast, for patients with CO disease, lobectomy was the most cost-effective option. Cancer 2013;119:3123–3132. © 2013 American Cancer Society.

SUMMARY Malignant pleural mesothelioma is one of the most lethal cancers known to man, typically resulting in a life expectancy of approximately 1 year from the time of diagnosis. Surgery remains investigational in the treatment of this cancer, yet the treatments that appear to have the greatest potential to impact the course of the disease are those that are surgery-based. The goal of surgery, as part of a multimodal treatment plan, is to achieve a macroscopic complete resection of the cancer. There are two surgical approaches, extrapleural pneumonectomy and lung-sparing surgery. Extrapleural pneumonectomy is the most standardized approach and almost certainly achieves the most complete resection, leaving behind the least amount of microscopic disease. Essentially, no aspects of lung-sparing operations are standardized and all techniques are likely to leave behind more microscopic cancer than an extrapleural pneumonectomy, yet this approach has the principal advantage of avoiding pneumonectomy for what is rightfully considered a palliative procedure. There are some recent reports revealing more favorable survivals for patients undergoing lung-sparing rather than lung-sacrificing surgery, but there is no conclusive evidence favoring either approach due to general limitations in the surgical literature for malignant pleural mesothelioma. One multimodal approach that has produced notably long survival rates incorporated radical pleurectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with intraoperative photodynamic therapy, a light-based cancer treatment. There is speculation that a photodynamic therapy-initiated immune response may have played a role in these results, but this has not been established. The contribution, if any, of photodynamic therapy to these results is an area of active investigation.

New therapeutic strategies are needed for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We conducted a single-center, open-label, nonrandomized, pilot and feasibility trial using two intrapleural doses of an adenoviral vector encoding human IFN-α (Ad.IFN-α2b). Nine subjects were enrolled at two dose levels. The first three subjects had very high pleural and systemic IFN-α concentrations resulting in severe "flu-like" symptoms necessitating dose de-escalation. The next six patients had reduced (but still significant) pleural and serum IFN-α levels, but with tolerable symptoms. Repeated vector administration appeared to prolong IFN-α expression levels. Anti-tumor humoral immune responses against mesothelioma cell lines were seen in seven of the eight subjects evaluated. No clinical responses were seen in the four subjects with advanced disease. However, evidence of disease stability or tumor regression was seen in the remaining five patients, including one dramatic example of partial tumor regression at sites not in contiguity with vector infusion. These data show that Ad.IFN-α2b has potential therapeutic benefit in MPM and that it generates anti-tumor immune responses that may induce anatomic and/or metabolic reductions in distant tumor. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01212367).

Pleural malignancies, primary or metastatic, portend a grim prognosis. In addition to the serious oncologic implications of a pleural malignancy, these tumors can be highly symptomatic. A malignant pleural effusion can cause dyspnea, secondary to lung compression, or even tension physiology from a hydrothorax under pressure. The need to palliate these effusions is a seemingly straightforward clinical scenario, but with nuances that can result in disastrous complications for the patient if not attended to appropriately. Solid pleural malignancies can cause great pain from chest wall invasion or can cause a myriad of morbid symptoms because of the invasion of thoracic structures, such as the heart, lungs, or esophagus. This article reviews pleural malignancies, the purely palliative treatments, and the treatments that are performed with definitive (curative) intent.

Introduction Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) with adjuvant radiotherapy may be used to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma. Radiation pneumonitis, felt to be related to contralateral lung radiation dose, may affect patient mortality in this setting. Two standard therapeutic approaches currently used to deliver adjuvant radiotherapy were compared in this study: intensity modulation radiation treatment (IMRT) with a planned dose of 45 Gray (Gy) and a modified electron-photon technique delivering 54 Gy. Methods Treatment plans of 10 mesothelioma patients who underwent EPP and hemithoracic IMRT to a total dose of 45 Gy were analyzed. Plans using a combination of opposed anterior posterior radiation fields and electron supplementation (electron-photon technique [EPT]) to a total dose of 54 Gy were then generated and compared with IMRT plans. Results Dosimetric comparison revealed a significant reduction in contralateral lung dose with EPT versus IMRT, even with increased prescription dose used with EPT plans. Median heart and contralateral kidney doses were also significantly reduced with EPT versus IMRT. Dose coverage of planning target volume and doses to spinal cord, liver, and ipsilateral kidney were similar with use of the two techniques. Conclusions Our data suggest that hemithoracic radiotherapy delivered after EPP using EPT may minimize dose to contralateral lung and other structures when compared with IMRT, without compromise of planning target volume coverage.

Purpose Non—small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with pleural spread is incurable, with median survival rates ranging from 6 to 9 months. Surgery alone fails to locally control this disease or extend survival beyond the accepted treatment, palliative chemotherapy. Methods We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the effects on local control and survival of combining surgery with intraoperative photodynamic therapy (PDT), a light-based cancer treatment, in patients with NSCLC with pleural spread. Patients received porfimer sodium (2 mg/kg), 24 hours before surgery, at which time all gross tumor was resected and followed by illumination of the hemithorax with 630 nm light to a measured dose of 30 J/cm2. Photosensitizer levels in tumor and surrounding normal tissue were measured. Results Twenty-two patients with NSCLC were enrolled; 17 underwent complete debulking and PDT, three underwent partial debulking/PDT, and two patients were unresectable. Local control of pleural disease at 6 months was achieved in 11 of 15 (73.3%; 95% CI, 44.9% to 92.2%) assessable patients. Median overall survival for all 22 patients was 21.7 months (95% CI, 17.7 to 25.8 months). Measured levels of porfimer sodium in tumor were greater than those measured in normal tissues, with ratios ranging from 1.19 to 22.42. Conclusion Our results indicate surgery and PDT can be performed safely with very good local control. The median survival of 21.7 months, calculated from the time of surgery and PDT is encouraging. Further evaluation of this therapy is warranted.

Purpose To present the principles and rationale of the Proton Priority System (PROPS), a priority points framework that assigns higher scores to patients thought to more likely benefit from proton therapy, and the distribution of PROPS scores by patient characteristics Methods and Materials We performed multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between PROPS scores and receipt of proton therapy, adjusted for insurance status, gender, race, geography, and the domains that inform the PROPS score. Results Among 1529 adult patients considered for proton therapy prioritization during our Center's ramp-up phase of treatment availability, PROPS scores varied by age, diagnosis, site, and other PROPS domains. In adjusted analyses, receipt of proton therapy was lower for patients with non-Medicare relative to Medicare health insurance (commercial vs Medicare: adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.64; managed care vs Medicare: OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28-0.56; Medicaid vs Medicare: OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.44). Proton Priority System score and age were not significantly associated with receipt of proton therapy. Conclusions The Proton Priority System is a rationally designed and transparent system for allocation of proton therapy slots based on the best available evidence and expert opinion. Because the actual allocation of treatment slots depends mostly on insurance status, payers may consider incorporating PROPS, or its underlying principles, into proton therapy coverage policies.

Surgery is the treatment option most likely to be associated with prolonged remission in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. However, it remains investigational and must always be combined with other modalities to treat the microscopic disease that remains after the most aggressive operations. Improvements in quality of life for appropriate patients with this rare yet incurable cancer may be obtained with less drastic lung-sparing surgical procedures along with intraoperative use of photodynamic therapy (PDT). Very encouraging survival results have been obtained with the combination of surgery and PDT, which requires the well-orchestrated collaborative effort of an extensive team of professionals, from thoracic surgeons and radiation oncologists to basic science researchers. Multi-institutional trials are necessary to duplicate these early findings and shed more light on the tumordirected immune response of this surgically based multimodal treatment. (JNCCN 2012;10[Suppl 2]:S75–S79

Background BRCA1–associated protein 1 (BAP1) is a tumor suppressor gene located on chromosome 3p21. Germline BAP1 mutations have been recently associated with an increased risk of malignant mesothelioma, atypical melanocytic tumors and other neoplasms. To answer the question if different germline BAP1 mutations may predispose to a single syndrome with a wide phenotypic range or to distinct syndromes, we investigated the presence of melanocytic tumors in two unrelated families (L and W) with germline BAP1 mutations and increased risk of malignant mesothelioma. Methods Suspicious cutaneous lesions were clinically and pathologically characterized and compared to those present in other families carrying BAP1 mutations. We then conducted a meta-analysis of all the studies reporting BAP1-mutated families to survey cancer risk related to the germline BAP1 mutation (means were compared using t-test and proportions were compared with Pearson χ2 test or two-tailed Fisher’s exact test). Results Melanocytic tumors: of the five members of the L family studied, four (80%) carried a germline BAP1 mutation (p.Gln684*) and also presented one or more atypical melanocytic tumors; of the seven members of W family studied, all carried a germline BAP1 mutation (p.Pro147fs*48) and four of them (57%) presented one or more atypical melanocytic tumors, that we propose to call “melanocytic BAP1-mutated atypical intradermal tumors” (MBAITs). Meta-analysis: 118 individuals from seven unrelated families were selected and divided into a BAP1-mutated cohort and a BAP1-non-mutated cohort. Malignant mesothelioma, uveal melanoma, cutaneous melanoma, and MBAITs prevalence was significantly higher in the BAP1-mutated cohort (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusions Germline BAP1 mutations are associated with a novel cancer syndrome characterized by malignant mesothelioma, uveal melanoma, cutaneous melanoma and MBAITs, and possibly by other cancers. MBAITs provide physicians with a marker to identify individuals who may carry germline BAP1 mutations and thus are at high risk of developing associated cancers.