Search

Background The incidence and biology of IDH1/2 mutations in pediatric gliomas are unclear. Notably, current treatment approaches by pediatric and adult providers vary significantly. We describe the frequency and clinical outcomes of IDH1/2-mutant gliomas in pediatrics. Methods We performed a multi-institutional analysis of the frequency of pediatric IDH1/2-mutant gliomas, identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS). In parallel, we retrospectively reviewed pediatric IDH1/2-mutant gliomas, analyzing clinico-genomic features, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Results Incidence: Among 851 patients with pediatric glioma who underwent NGS, we identified 78 with IDH1/2 mutations. Among patients 0–9 and 10–21 years old, 2/378 (0.5%) and 76/473 (16.1%) had IDH1/2-mutant tumors, respectively. Frequency of IDH mutations was similar between low-grade glioma (52/570, 9.1%) and high-grade glioma (25/277, 9.0%). Four tumors were graded as intermediate histologically, with one IDH1 mutation. Outcome: Seventy-six patients with IDH1/2-mutant glioma had outcome data available. Eighty-four percent of patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) were managed observantly without additional therapy. For low-grade astrocytoma, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 42.9% (95%CI:20.3–63.8) and, despite excellent short-term overall survival (OS), numerous disease-related deaths after year 10 were reported. Patients with high-grade astrocytoma had a 5-year PFS/OS of 36.8% (95%CI:8.8–66.4) and 84% (95%CI:50.1–95.6), respectively. Patients with oligodendroglioma had excellent OS. Conclusions A subset of pediatric gliomas is driven by IDH1/2 mutations, with a higher rate among adolescents. The majority of patients underwent upfront observant management without adjuvant therapy. Findings suggest that the natural history of pediatric IDH1/2-mutant glioma may be similar to that of adults, though additional studies are needed.

Background The prognosis for patients with pediatric high-grade glioma (pHGG) is poor despite aggressive multimodal therapy. Objective responses to targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors have been reported in some patients with recurrent BRAF-mutant pHGG but are rarely sustained. Methods We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional review of patients with BRAF-mutant pHGG treated with off-label BRAF +/– MEK inhibitors as part of their initial therapy. Results Nineteen patients were identified, with a median age of 11.7 years (range, 2.3–21.4). Histologic diagnoses included HGG (n = 6), glioblastoma (n = 3), anaplastic ganglioglioma (n = 4), diffuse midline glioma (n = 3), high-grade neuroepithelial tumor (n = 1), anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 1), and anaplastic astroblastoma (n = 1). Recurrent concomitant oncogenic alterations included CDKN2A/B loss, H3 K27M, as well as mutations in ATRX, EGFR, and TERT. Eight patients received BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Eleven patients received combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Most patients tolerated long-term treatment well with no grade 4–5 toxicities. Objective and durable imaging responses were seen in the majority of patients with measurable disease. At a median follow-up of 2.3 years (range, 0.3–6.5), three-year progression-free and overall survival for the cohort were 65% and 82%, respectively, and superior to a historical control cohort of BRAF-mutant pHGG patients treated with conventional therapies. Conclusions Upfront targeted therapy for patients with BRAF-mutant pHGG is feasible and effective, with superior clinical outcomes compared to historical data. This promising treatment paradigm is currently being evaluated prospectively in the Children’s Oncology Group ACNS1723 clinical trial.

Background The ability to identify genetic alterations in cancers is essential for precision medicine; however, surgical approaches to obtain brain tumor tissue are invasive. Profiling circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in liquid biopsies has emerged as a promising approach to avoid invasive procedures. Here, we systematically evaluated the feasibility of profiling pediatric brain tumors using ctDNA obtained from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and urine. Methods We prospectively collected 564 specimens (257 blood, 240 urine, and 67 CSF samples) from 258 patients across all histopathologies. We performed ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) to assess copy number variations and estimate tumor fraction and developed a pediatric CNS tumor hybrid capture panel for deep sequencing of specific mutations and fusions. Results ULP-WGS detected copy number alterations in 9/46 (20%) CSF, 3/230 (1.3%) plasma, and 0/153 urine samples. Sequencing detected alterations in 3/10 (30%) CSF, 2/74 (2.7%) plasma, and 0/2 urine samples. The only positive results were in high-grade tumors. However, most samples had insufficient somatic mutations (median 1, range 0-39) discoverable by the sequencing panel to provide sufficient power to detect tumor fractions of greater than 0.1%. Conclusions Children with brain tumors harbor very low levels of ctDNA in blood, CSF, and urine, with CSF having the most DNA detectable. Molecular profiling is feasible in a small subset of high-grade tumors. The level of clonal aberrations per genome is low in most of the tumors, posing a challenge for detection using whole-genome or even targeted sequencing methods. Substantial challenges therefore remain to genetically characterize pediatric brain tumors from liquid biopsies.

Pediatric pan-cancer genome analyses do not capture the full range of diagnoses encountered in clinical practice. To inform basket trial design and real-world precision oncology practice, we classified diagnoses and assessed the landscape of mutations, including trial-matching, in an unselected cohort of pediatric solid tumors. Since 2013 all Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s patients have been offered participation in the Profile study. Participant tumor samples were sequenced with DFCI-OncoPanel, a targeted panel test sequencing exons of up to 447 cancer genes for single nucleotide variants, insertions and deletions and copy number alterations, and introns and exons of up to 60 genes for rearrangements. Patient diagnosis was classified according to ICD-O, version 3.2. Genomic alterations were analyzed for matching to the actionable mutation lists of precision oncology basket trials (NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH, NCI-MATCH, and the ASCO TAPUR Study v.3). Data will be shared with the Childhood Cancer Data Initiative. There were 888 pediatric patients with sequencing enrolled in Profile between January 2013 and March 2019; 512 (58%) with solid tumors and 376 (42%) with CNS tumors. Fifty-five percent (491/888) of patients had one of ten common pediatric cancer diagnoses: neuroblastoma (n=80), low-grade glioma (n=72), Wilms tumor (n=57), medulloblastoma (n=55), pilocytic astrocytoma (n=47), rhabdomyosarcoma (n=44), osteosarcoma (n=42), ependymoma (n=39), Ewing sarcoma (n=28) and glioblastoma (n=27). The remaining 45% (397/888) had one of 85 distinct rare malignancies with less than 25 cases per diagnosis. Most (80/85) of these rare diagnoses are not represented in prior pediatric pan-cancer sequencing studies. Recurrent (>5%) pathogenic alterations were, in common and rare diagnoses, TP53 mutations(m) and deletions(del) and BRAFm and rearrangements(r), in common diagnoses, MYC/MYCN amplification (amp) and EWSR1r and, in rare diagnoses, CTNNB1m, CDKN2A/Bdel and NF1m/del. We found that 31% (n=271/888) of patients had at least 1 variant matching a basket trial treatment arm. Genes with matching alterations include BRAF (10%), NF1 (4%), PI3KCA (3%), NRAS (2%), BRCA2 (2%), ALK (1%), and FGFR1 (1%). Sequencing of pediatric malignancies is increasing. This study highlights opportunities to use the resulting genomic data to inform genome-selected clinical trial design and uncover drivers in pediatric cancers. The proportion of cases in this cohort with genomic alterations meeting eligibility for basket trials is equivalent to that seen in the pediatric MATCH screening study. Due to the low prevalence of the diagnoses in the long tail of cancer types in this study, defining the genomic landscape of ultra-rare cancers will require data sharing. Classifying pediatric cancer diagnoses using the ICD-O standard ontology system is feasible and will facilitate data sharing. Citation Format: Suzanne J. Forrest, Hersh Gupta, Abigail Ward, Yvonne Li, Duong Doan, Alyaa Al-Ibraheemi, Sanda Alexandrescu, Pratiti Bandopadhayay, Suzanne Shusterman, Elizabeth A. Mullen, Natalie Collins, Susan N. Chi, Karen D. Wright, Priti Kumari, Tali Mazor, Keith L. Ligon, Priyanka Shivdasani, Phani Davineni, Monica Manam, Richard L. Schilsky, Suanna S. Bruinooge, Jaime M. Guidry Auvil, Ethan Cerami, Barrett J. Rollins, Matthew L. Meyerson, Neal I. Lindeman, Laura MacConaill, Bruce E. Johnson, Andrew D. Cherniack, Alanna J. Church, Katherine A. Janeway. Sequencing of 888 pediatric solid tumors informs precision oncology trial design and data sharing initiatives in pediatric cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3890.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for pediatric high-grade glioma (pHGG) is poor despite aggressive multi-modal therapy. Objective responses to targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors have been reported in some patients with recurrent BRAF-mutant pHGG but are rarely sustained. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional review of patients with BRAF-mutant pHGG treated with off-label BRAF +/- MEK inhibitors as part of their initial therapy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were identified, with a median age of 10.7 years (range: 1.8–20.3). Histologic diagnoses included HGG (n=6), glioblastoma (n=3), anaplastic ganglioglioma (n=4), diffuse midline glioma (n=3), high-grade neuroepithelial tumor (n=1), anaplastic astrocytoma (n=1), and anaplastic astroblastoma (n=1). Recurrent concomitant oncogenic alterations included CDKN2A/B loss, H3 K27M, as well as mutations in ATRX, EGFR and TERT. Eight patients received BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Eleven patients received combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Most patients tolerated long-term treatment well with no grade 4–5 toxicities. Objective and durable imaging responses were seen in the majority of patients with measurable disease. At a median follow-up of 2.3 years (range,0.3–6.5), three-year progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the cohort were 65% and 82%, respectively, and superior to a historical control cohort treated with conventional therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront targeted therapy for patients with BRAF-mutant pHGG is feasible and effective, with superior clinical outcomes observed compared to historical data. This promising treatment paradigm is currently being evaluated prospectively in the Children’s Oncology Group ACNS1723 clinical trial.