Search

Background: The aim of this study was to assess acute and late morbidity measured by the physician and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients receiving whole pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the setting of a national clinical trial. Material and methods: A total of 88 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate and high-risk parameters were enrolled from 2011 to 2013. All patients received 78 Gy in 39 fractions of IMRT delivering simultaneous 78 Gy to the prostate and 56 Gy to the seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. Physician-reported morbidity was assessed by CTCAE v.4.0. PROs were registered for gastro-intestinal (GI) by the RT-ARD score, genito-urinary (GU) by DAN-PSS, sexual and hormonal by EPIC-26, and quality of life (QoL) by EORTC QLQ-C30. Results: Median follow-up (FU) time was 4.6 years. No persistent late CTCAE grade 3+ morbidity was observed. Prevalence of CTCAE grade 2+ GI morbidities varied from 0 to 6% at baseline throughout FU time, except for diarrhea, which was reported in 19% of the patients post-RT. PROs revealed increased GI morbidity (≥1 monthly episode) for "rectal urgency", "use of pads", "incomplete evacuation", "mucus in stool" and "bowel function impact on QoL" all remained significantly different (p

Medical physics has made considerable contributions to recent advances in radiation oncology. Medical physicists are key players in the clinical and scientific radiation oncology context due to their unique skill sets, flexibility, clinical involvement and intrinsic translational character. The continuing development and widespread adoption of "high-tech" radiotherapy has led to an increased need for medical physics involvement. More recently, our field is rapidly changing towards an era of "precision oncology". These changes have opened new challenges for the definition of the professional and scientific roles and responsibilities of medical physicists. In this paper, we have identified four grand challenges of medical physics in radiation oncology: (1) improving target volume definition, (2) adoption of artificial intelligence and automation, (3) development of predictive models of biological effects for precision medicine, and (4) need for leadership. New visions and suggestions to orientate medical physics to successfully face these new challenges are summarized. We foresee that the scientific and professional challenges of our times are pushing medical physicists to accelerate toward multidisciplinarity. Medical physicists are expected to innovatively drive interactions and collaborations with other specialists outside radiation oncology while the radiation physics core will remain central. Medical physicists will retain strong and pivotal roles in quality, safety and in managing ever more complex technologies. The new challenges will require medical physicists to continuously update skills and innovate education, adapt curricula to include new fields, reinforce multi-disciplinary attitude and spirit of innovation. These challenges require visionary and open leadership, which is able to merge established roles with the exciting new fields where medical physics should increasingly contribute. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Background and purpose: Proton therapy (PT) is currently being studied to improve normal tissue (NT) sparing beyond what can be achieved with conventional photon-based therapy. Compared to photons, PT dose distributions have a reduced NT low-to-intermediate ‘dose bath’ and a different biological effectiveness, questioning the applicability of photon-based NT complication probability (NTCP) models to PT. The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of photon-based NTCP models to rectum morbidity outcomes following PT. Materials and methods: Treatment planning and morbidity data from 1151 prostate cancer patients treated with passive scattering PT and from 159 patients treated with conventional 3D conformal four-field photon therapy were analysed. Prospectively scored gastrointestinal morbidities (grade >=2) were analysed, with a total of 184 events (protons; medical and procedural) and 12 events (photons; procedural only), respectively. Rectal dose volume histograms were extracted for all patients in both cohorts and used as input to two different NTCP models, with up to six different published photon-based parameter sets. Results: Photon-based rectal NTCP models either over- or underestimated the clinically observed gastrointestinal morbidity when used on the proton cohort, depending on the choice of endpoint (p < 0.05 for all parameter sets, for both morbidity classifications). Four of the six photon-based NTCP models showed a good fit to the photon outcome data (p > 0.05). Conclusion: There were large differences in morbidity predictions between cohorts and modalities, indicating that the validity of NTCP models and parameters across institutions and treatment modalities should be carefully investigated prior to clinical application.

Background: Children with brain tumors undergoing radiotherapy are at particular risk of radiation-induced morbidity and are therefore routinely considered for proton therapy (PT) to reduce the dose to healthy tissues. The aim of this study was to apply pediatric constraints and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models when evaluating the differences between PT and contemporary photon-based radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods: Forty patients (aged 1–17 years) referred from Norwegian institutions to cranial PT abroad during 2014–2016 were selected for VMAT re-planning using the original CT sets and target volumes. The VMAT and delivered PT plans were compared by dose/volume metrics and NTCP models related to growth hormone deficiency, auditory toxicity, visual impairment, xerostomia, neurocognitive outcome and secondary brain and parotid gland cancers. Results: The supratentorial brain, temporal lobes, hippocampi, hypothalamus, pituitary glands, cochleas, salivary glands, optic nerves and chiasm received lower mean doses from PT. Reductions in population median NTCP were significant for auditory toxicity (VMAT: 3.8%; PT: 0.3%), neurocognitive outcome (VMAT: 3.0 IQ points decline at 5 years post RT; PT: 2.5 IQ points), xerostomia (VMAT: 2.0%; PT: 0.6%), excess absolute risk of secondary cancer of the brain (VMAT: 9.2%; PT: 6.7%) and salivary glands (VMAT: 2.8%; PT:0.5%). Across all patients, 23/38 PT plans had better or comparable estimated risks for all endpoints (within ±10% of the risk relative to VMAT), whereas for 1/38 patients all estimates were better or comparable with VMAT. Conclusions: PT reduced the volumes of normal tissues exposed to radiation, particularly low-to-intermediate dose levels, and this was reflected in lower NTCP. Of the included endpoints, substantial reductions in population medians were seen from the delivered PT plans for auditory complications, xerostomia, and risk of secondary cancers of the brain and salivary glands.

Background: Several brain substructures associated with cognition (BSCs) are located close to typical pediatric brain tumors. Pediatric patients therefore have considerable risks of neurocognitive impairment after brain radiotherapy. In this study, we investigated the radiation doses received by BSCs for three common locations of pediatric brain tumor entities. Material and methods: For ten patients in each group [posterior fossa ependymoma (PFE), craniopharyngioma (CP), and hemispheric ependymoma (HE)], the cumulative fraction of BSCs volumes receiving various dose levels were analyzed. We subsequently explored the differences in dose pattern between the three groups and used available dose response models from the literature to estimate treatment-induced intelligence quotient (IQ) decline. Results: Doses to BSCs were found to differ considerably between the groups, depending on their position relative to the tumor. Large inter-patient variations were observed in the ipsilateral structures of the HE groups, and at low doses for all three groups. IQ decline estimates differed depending on the model applied, presenting larger variations in the HE group. Conclusion: While there were notable differences in the dose patterns between the groups, the extent of estimated IQ decline depended more on the model applied. This inter-model variability should be considered in dose–effect assessments on cognitive outcomes of pediatric patients.

Background: Proton therapy (PT) is sensitive towards anatomical changes that may occur during a treatment course. The aim of this study was to investigate if anatomically robust PT (ARPT) plans incorporating patient-specific target motion improved target coverage while still sparing normal tissues, when applied on locally advanced prostate cancer patients where pelvic irradiation is indicated. Material and methods: A planning computed tomography (CT) scan used for dose calculation and two additional CTs (acquired on different days) were used to make patient-specific targets for the ARPT plans on the eight included patients. The plans were compared to a conventional robust PT plan and a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photon plan, which were derived from the planning CT (pCT). Worst-case robust optimisation was used for all proton plans with a setup uncertainty of 5 mm and a range uncertainty of 3.5%. Target coverage (V95% and D95%) and normal tissue doses (V5–75 Gy) were evaluated on 6–8 rCTs per patient. Results: The ARPT plans improved the prostate target coverage for the most challenging patient compared to conventional robust PT plans (20% point increase for V95% and 31 Gy increase for D95%). Across the whole cohort the estimated mean value for V95% was 97% for the ARPT plans and 95% for the conventional robust PT plans. The ARPT plans had a slight, statistically insignificant increase in normal tissue doses compared to the conventional robust proton plans. Compared to VMAT, the ARPT plans significantly reduced the normal tissue doses in the low-to-intermediate dose range. Conclusions: While both proton plans reduced the low-to-intermediate normal tissue doses compared to VMAT, ARPT plans improved the target coverage for the most challenging patient without significantly increasing the normal tissue doses compared to conventional robust PT plans.

Survivors of pediatric brain tumors are susceptible to neurovascular disease after radiotherapy, with dose to the chiasm or Circle of Willis (CW) as risk factors. The aims of this study were to develop a delineation atlas of neurovascular structures, to investigate the doses to these structures in relation to tumor location and to investigate potential dose surrogates for the CW dose. An atlas of the CW, the large intracranial arteries and the suprasellar cistern (SC) was developed and validated. Thirty proton plans from previously treated pediatric brain tumor patients were retrieved and grouped according to tumor site: 10 central, 10 lateralized, and 10 posterior fossa tumors. Based on the atlas, neurovascular structures were delineated and dose metrics (mean dose (Dmean) and maximal dose (Dmax)) to these structures and the already delineated chiasm were evaluated. The agreement between dose metrics to the CW vs. chiasm/SC was investigated. The minimal Hausdorff distance (HDmin) between the target and SC was correlated with the SC Dmean. The median Dmean/Dmax to the CW were 53 Gy(RBE)/55 Gy(RBE) in the central tumors, 18 Gy(RBE)/25 Gy(RBE) in the lateralized tumors and 30 Gy(RBE)/49 Gy(RBE) in the posterior fossa tumors. There was a good agreement between the Dmax/Dmean to the CW and the SC for all cases (R2=0.99), while in the posterior fossa group, the CW Dmax was underestimated when using the chiasm as surrogate (R2=0.76). Across all patients, cases with HDmin < 10 mm between the target and the SC received the highest SC Dmean. The pattern of dose to neurovascular structures varied with the tumor location. For all locations, SC doses could be used as a surrogate for CW doses. A minimal distance larger than 10 mm between the target and the SC indicated a potential for neurovascular dose sparing.

Purpose: During radiation therapy for pediatric brain tumors, the brainstem is a critical organ at risk, possibly with different radio-sensitivity across its substructures. In proton therapy, treatment planning is currently performed using a constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 (RBE1.1), whereas preclinical studies point toward spatial variability of this factor. To shed light on this biological uncertainty, we investigated the spatial agreement between isodose maps produced by different RBE models, with emphasis on (smaller) substructures of the brainstem. Methods and Materials: Proton plans were recalculated using Monte Carlo simulations in 3 anonymized pediatric patients with brain tumors (a craniopharyngioma, a low-grade glioma, and a posterior fossa ependymoma) to obtain dose and linear energy transfer distributions. Doses and volume metrics for the brainstem and its substructures were calculated using a constant RBE1.1, 4 phenomenological RBE models with varying (α/β)x parameters, and with a simpler linear energy transfer-dependent model. The spatial agreement between the dose distributions of constant RBE1.1 versus the variable RBE models was compared using the Dice similarity coefficient. Results: The spatial agreement between the variable RBE dose distributions and RBE1.1 decreased with increasing isodose levels in all patient cases. The patient with ependymoma showed the greatest variation in dose and dose volumes, where V50Gy(RBE) in the brainstem increased from 32% (RBE1.1) to 35% to 49% depending on the applied model, corresponding to a spatial agreement (Dice similarity coefficient) between 0.79 and 0.95. The remaining patients showed similar trends, however, with lower absolute values due to lower brainstem doses. Conclusions: All phenomenological RBE models fully enclosed the isodose volumes of the constant RBE1.1, and the volumes based on variable RBE spatially agreed. The spatial agreement was dependent on the isodose level, where higher isodose levels showed larger expansions and less agreement between the variable RBE models and RBE1.1.

Background and purpose Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models applied for model-based patient selection to proton therapy (PT) have usually been derived using dose/volume histogram (DVH) parameters from photon-based radiotherapy. This study aimed to derive PT-specific multivariate NTCP models that also accounted for the spatial dose distribution (rectum only) as well as non-dose/volume related factors. Materials and methods The study included rectum and bladder DVHs, 2D rectal dose maps and relevant patient/treatment characteristics from 1151 prostate cancer cases treated with PT. Prospectively scored Grade 2 late rectal bleeding (CTCAE v3.0, also procedural interventions separately) (n = 156 (15%)) and Grade 3+ GU morbidity (n = 51 (4%)) were entered into a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Model evaluation included assessment of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Anticoagulant use was a dominant predictor, chosen in four of the six rectum models and in the bladder model. Age was a dominant predictor in all procedural only rectum models while prostate volume, bladder D5% and V75Gy were predictors in the bladder model. The selection frequency of the dose/volume predictors varied widely, where the percentage of the anterior rectum surface receiving >=75 Gy was the most robust. AUC values ranged from 0.58 to 0.70 across all models, with no clear difference between the DVH- and spatial-based models for the rectum. Conclusion Anticoagulant use and age were the most prominent predictors in the NTCP models. V75Gy of the rectal wall and the bladder was a predictor in the DVH-based models of the rectum and bladder respectively.

Background: Clinically, a constant value of 1.1 is used for the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons, whereas in vitro the RBE has been shown to vary depending on physical dose, tissue type, and linear energy transfer (LET). As the LET increases at the distal end of the proton beam, concerns exist for an elevated RBE in normal tissues. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the heterogeneity of RBE to brain structures associated with cognition (BSCs) in pediatric suprasellar tumors. Material and methods: Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans for 10 pediatric craniopharyngioma patients were re-calculated using 11 phenomenological and two plan-based variable RBE models. Based on LET, tissue dependence and number of data points used to fit the models, the three RBE models considered the most relevant for the studied endpoint were selected. Thirty BSCs were investigated in terms of RBE and dose/volume parameters. Results: For a representative patient, the median (range) dose-weighted mean RBE (RBEd) across all BSCs from the plan-based models was among the lowest (1.09 (1.02–1.52) vs. the phenomenological models at 1.21 (0.78–2.24)). Omitting tissue dependency resulted in RBEd at 1.21 (1.04–2.24). Across all patients, the narrower RBE model selection gave median RBEd values from 1.22 to 1.30. Conclusion: For all BSCs, there was a systematic model-dependent variation in RBEd, mirroring the uncertainty in biological effects of protons. According to a refined selection of in vitro models, the RBE variation across BSCs was in effect underestimated when using a fixed RBE of 1.1.

Background and purpose: Planned doses are used as surrogate for the actually delivered dose in radiotherapy. We have estimated the delivered dose in a dose-escalation trial of locally advanced prostate cancer by statistical dose-accumulation and by DVH-summation, and compared to planned dose.Materials and method: Prescribed dose-escalation to the prostate was 67.5 Gy/25fr., corresponding to 81GyEQD2 assuming alpha/beta = 1.5. The 21 patients had three targets (i.e. CTV67.5 + 2 mm, CTV60 + 5 mm, CTV50 + 10 mm) irradiated by a simultaneous-integrated-boost technique. Analysis was based on 213 CT scans and 5-years of follow-up. For statistical dose-accumulation, we modelled 10000 possible treatment courses based on planned dose and deformation-vector-fields from contour-based registration. For DVH-summation we recalculated dose on repeat-CTs and estimated median D98%/EUD. Groups with/without disease recurrence were compared.Results: Discrepancies between planned and accumulated dose were mostly seen for CTV67.5, where under-dosage was found at different locations in the prostate in 12/21 patients. Delivered dose-escalation (D98%) was on average 73.9GyEQD2 (range: 68.3-78.7GyEQD2). No significant difference in accumulated-D98% was found in patients with (n = 8) and without (n = 13) recurrence (p > 0.05). Average D98%/EUD with statistical dose-accumulation vs DVH-summation was significantly different in CTV60, CTV50, rectum and bladder but not in CTV67.5.Conclusion: The planned dose escalation was not received by more than half-of-the patients. Robustness of the prostate target (CTV67.5) should therefore be better prioritized in these patients given the low toxicity profile. Estimates of delivered dose were less conservative for dose-accumulation due to interaction of random organ motion with the dose matrix. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND:Proton therapy dose distributions are sensitive to range variations, e.g. arising from inter-fraction organ motion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-fraction motion robustness of proton beams from different beam angles in irradiation of pelvic lymph nodes (LNs).MATERIAL AND METHODS:Planning CT (pCT) and multiple repeat CT (rCT) scans of 18 prostate cancer patients were used. Considering left and right LNs separately, the average water equivalent path length (WEPL) over all ray paths in the beams eye view of the LNs were calculated for all gantry/couch angle combinations across all rCTs versus the corresponding pCT. Single beam proton plans were optimized on the pCT for all gantry angles (0° couch) and were re-calculated on all rCTs for each respective patient. WEPL and dose parameters were extracted and a statistical clustering analysis performed to identify patient sub-populations in terms of patterns in which angles were robust.RESULTS:The WEPL analysis showed a general pattern of least variation for 0° couch beam angles where three minima were found across gantry angles for the left LNs and two for the right LNs. The clustering analysis identified three patient sub-groups for the left LNs and two groups for the right LNs. The dose calculations showed similar results as the WEPL variation, e.g. for the left LNs angles around 25°-35°, 100°-110°, and 160°-170° were consistently preferable for both target and organs at risk.CONCLUSIONS:Sub-populations of patients with similar patterns of WEPL variations across beam angles were identified. The most robust angles found for WEPL variations were also confirmed by the dose/volume analysis. BACKGROUND: Proton therapy dose distributions are sensitive to range variations, e.g. arising from inter-fraction organ motion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-fraction motion robustness of proton beams from different beam angles in irradiation of pelvic lymph nodes (LNs).MATERIAL AND METHODS: Planning CT (pCT) and multiple repeat CT (rCT) scans of 18 prostate cancer patients were used. Considering left and right LNs separately, the average water equivalent path length (WEPL) over all ray paths in the beams eye view of the LNs were calculated for all gantry/couch angle combinations across all rCTs versus the corresponding pCT. Single beam proton plans were optimized on the pCT for all gantry angles (0° couch) and were re-calculated on all rCTs for each respective patient. WEPL and dose parameters were extracted and a statistical clustering analysis performed to identify patient sub-populations in terms of patterns in which angles were robust.RESULTS: The WEPL analysis showed a general pattern of least variation for 0° couch beam angles where three minima were found across gantry angles for the left LNs and two for the right LNs. The clustering analysis identified three patient sub-groups for the left LNs and two groups for the right LNs. The dose calculations showed similar results as the WEPL variation, e.g. for the left LNs angles around 25°-35°, 100°-110°, and 160°-170° were consistently preferable for both target and organs at risk.CONCLUSIONS: Sub-populations of patients with similar patterns of WEPL variations across beam angles were identified. The most robust angles found for WEPL variations were also confirmed by the dose/volume analysis.

A number of health disciplines are involved in diagnosing, staging and treating cancer, using a broad array of technologies and treatment approaches. One highly relevant discipline in this field is...

BACKGROUND: Inter-fractional variation in urinary bladder volumes during the course of radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer causes deviations between planned and delivered doses. This study compared planned vs. daily cone-beam CT (CBCT)-based spatial bladder dose distributions, for prostate cancer patients receiving local prostate treatment (local treatment) vs. prostate including pelvic lymph node irradiation (pelvic treatment). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (N=15 local treatment; N=12 pelvic treatment) were treated using daily image-guided RT (1.8 Gy@43–45 fx), adhering to a full bladder/empty rectum protocol. For each patient, 9–10 CBCTs were registered to the planning CT, using the clinically applied translations. The urinary bladder was manually segmented on each CBCT, 3mm inner shells were generated, and semi and quadrant sectors were created using axial/coronal cuts. Planned and delivered DVH metrics were compared across patients and between the two groups of treatment (t-test, p

The use of total body irradiation as part of conditioning regimens for acute leukaemia is progressively declining because of concerns of late toxic effects and the introduction of radiation-free regimens. Total marrow irradiation and total marrow and lymphoid irradiation represent more targeted forms of radiotherapy compared with total body irradiation that have the potential to decrease toxicity and escalate the dose to the bone marrow for high-risk patients. We review the technological basis and the clinical development of total marrow irradiation and total marrow and lymphoid irradiation, highlighting both the possible advantages as well as the current roadblocks for widespread implementation among transplantation units. The exact role of total marrow irradiation or total marrow and lymphoid irradiation in new conditioning regimens seems dependent on its technological implementation, aiming to make the whole procedure less time consuming, more streamlined, and easier to integrate into the clinical workflow. We also foresee a role for computer-assisted planning, as a way to improve planning and delivery and to incorporate total marrow irradiation and total marrow and lymphoid irradiation in multi-centric phase 2–3 trials.

Background and purpose Reducing radiation exposure to the temporal lobes could be beneficial to preserve cognitive function in paediatric brain tumour patients. The distribution of doses to brain substructures associated with cognition (BSCs) both within and outside of the temporal lobe have not been reported. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate temporal lobe sparing photon vs. proton therapy for paediatric suprasellar tumours. Material and methods Data from ten anonymized craniopharyngioma patients were used in this study. Temporal lobe sparing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy plans were optimized to maintain consistent target metrics as in the delivered double scattering proton therapy (DSPT) plans. Thirty BSCs were delineated, including temporal lobe substructures (i.e. amygdala, hippocampus, entorhinal cortex). The dose/volume fractions to each BSC were analysed, and intelligence quotient (IQ) as well as memory scores were estimated to compare the different modalities. Results The exposed volumes of the temporal lobes and their substructures were consistently reduced with PBS compared to DSPT and VMAT, e.g. the left hippocampus V10Gy from 100% (VMAT) or 41% (DSPT) to 5% with PBS (p = 0.002). Some of the ventricular substructures were better spared with VMAT compared to both proton modalities. The reduced doses to the temporal lobes achieved with PBS translated into improved predicted memory outcomes, but not for the estimated IQ. Conclusion The irradiated volumes of temporal lobe BSCs were consistently the lowest with PBS, whereas the model-based estimates of cognitive outcomes were less consistent.

Background: Proton arc therapy may improve physical dose conformity and reduce concerns of elevated linear energy transfer (LET) and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) at the end of the proton range, while offering more degrees of freedom for normal tissue sparing. To explore the potential of proton arc therapy, we studied the effect of increasing the number of beams on physical and biologically equivalent dose conformity in the setting of pediatric brain tumors. Material and methods: A cylindrical phantom (Ø = 150 mm) with central cylindrical targets (Ø = 25 and 30 mm) was planned with increasing number of equiangular coplanar proton beams (from 3 to 36). For four anonymized pediatric brain tumor patients, two ‘surrogate’ proton arc plans (18 equiangular coplanar or sagittal beams) and a reference plan with 3 non-coplanar beams were constructed. Biologically equivalent doses were calculated using two RBE scenarios: RBE1.1; and RBELET, the physical dose weighted by the LET. For both RBE scenarios, dose gradients were assessed, and doses to cognitive brain structures were reported. Results: Increasing the number of beams resulted in an improved dose gradient and reduced volume exposed to intermediate LET levels, at the expense of increased low-dose and low-LET volumes. Most of the differences between the two RBE scenarios were seen around the prescription dose level, where the isodose volumes increased with the RBELET plans, e.g. up to 63% in the 3-beam plan for the smallest phantom target. Overall, the temporal lobes were better spared with the sagittal proton arc surrogate plans, e.g. a mean dose of 3.9 Gy compared to 6 Gy in the reference 3-beam plan (median value, RBE1.1). Conclusion: Proton arc therapy has the potential to improve dose gradients to better spare cognitive brain structures. However, this is at the expense of increased low-dose/low-LET volumes, with possible implications for secondary cancer risks.

State-of-the-art radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer has led to improved overall cancer-specific survival rates by increasing the dose delivered to the target, while maintaining the doses deliver...

We present the Bladder Runner, a novel tool to enable detailed visual exploration and analysis of the impact of bladder shape variation on the accuracy of dose delivery, during the course of prostate cancer radiotherapy (RT). Our tool enables the investigation of individual patients and cohorts through the entire treatment process, and it can give indications of RT-induced complications for the patient. In prostate cancer RT treatment, despite the design of an initial plan prior to dose administration, bladder toxicity remains very common. The main reason is that the dose is delivered in multiple fractions over a period of weeks, during which, the anatomical variation of the bladder – due to differences in urinary filling – causes deviations between planned and delivered doses. Clinical researchers want to correlate bladder shape variations to dose deviations and toxicity risk through cohort studies, to understand which specific bladder shape characteristics are more prone to side effects. This is currently done with Dose-Volume Histograms (DVHs), which provide limited, qualitative insight. The effect of bladder variation on dose delivery and the resulting toxicity cannot be currently examined with the DVHs. To address this need, we designed and implemented the Bladder Runner, which incorporates visualization strategies in a highly interactive environment with multiple linked views. Individual patients can be explored and analyzed through the entire treatment period, while inter-patient and temporal exploration, analysis and comparison are also supported. We demonstrate the applicability of our presented tool with a usage scenario, employing a dataset of 29 patients followed through the course of the treatment, across 13 time points. We conducted an evaluation with three clinical researchers working on the investigation of RT-induced bladder toxicity. All participants agreed that Bladder Runner provides better understanding and new opportunities for the exploration and analysis of the involved cohort data.

Medicalphysicistsworkingin radiotherapydepartments inhos-pitals are often facing a challenge in balancing their time andefforts between clinical demands in routine practice and theirambitions toward research and development of the field. Thisdilemma is certainly not unique to medical physics, but it maybe accentuated in our field because of the contrast between phy-sics as a scientific discipline, and the clinical realities in a hospital.The dilemma reminds one of the classical dilemma in Goethe’sFaust: ‘‘Two souls, alas, are dwelling in my breast’’.One ‘‘soul’’ of the medical physicist is strictly devoted to guar-anteeing the safe and accurate delivery of radiation to patients,including the search for optimal treatment solutions, efficientlysolving the associated technical and clinical problems, and ulti-mately to providing a considerable contribution to the care of can-cer patients in close collaboration with radiation oncologists andother professionals.The research ‘‘soul’’ of medical physicists, on the other hand, isdevoted to explore new methods, tools, and models. These endeav-ors have led to extraordinary innovation and growth, incorporatingthe intrinsic inter-disciplinary and translational vocation of ourdiscipline. The dramatic evolution of radiation oncology in the lastdecades was largely initiated and progressed by medical physics[1]. However, this rapid evolution has changed the role and theperspectives of medical physicists over time, putting more andmore emphasis on the support of the increasingly demanding com-plex technologies [2,3]. Today the two cited ‘‘souls’’ of medicalphysicists appear sometimes competitive and sometimes synergis-tic, but in many cases they are not clearly enough identified andunderstood. This paper is based on a symposium dedicated to thisissue, organized at the annual ESTRO meeting held in Vienna inApril 2014 in collaboration with the American Association of Physi-cists in Medicine (AAPM) and the European Federation of MedicalPhysics (EFOMP). The aim of the paper is to convey and synthesizethe perspectives shared in this session.Harmonization of the medical physics profession within EuropeThe standing of medical physicists both as researchers and asclinical service providers is highly variable across the globe, par-ticularly within Europe. In Europe, EFOMP has worked towardthe harmonization of the medical physics profession,issuing sever-al policy statements, providing recommendations on the roles ofthe medical physicist and promoting it as a Regulated Health CareProfession [4]. Despite pressure from EFOMP and the recent Direc-tives 2005/36/EC and 2013/55/EC related to professional qualifica-tions [5,6], the medical physicist has not yet been included in aformal recognition process in many European countries.The implementation of a robust educational track is an essentialfoundation to the path toward recognition and accreditation ofmedical physicists within Europe: in line with this, EFOMP andESTRO developed a Qualification and Curricular framework basedon the Bologna Process [7]. Despite the existence of this powerfulharmonization tool, a recent survey still revealed a lack of profes-sional recognition within the medical physics community. Thereseems to be a dichotomy between medical physicists as profes-sionals applying science in healthcare ‘‘having a role in researchand development of new methodologies’’ [8] and a widespreadfeeling to be mainly involved in technical support.The changing professional role of medical physics in the USIn the United States, the AmericanBoard of Radiology(ABR) cer-tification requirements for medical physicists have had a profoundimpact toward tightening of both the professional role and theresearch role of medical physicists. Compliance with the ABR cer-tification requirements is overseen by the Commission onAccreditation of Medical Physics Educational Programs (CAMPEP),and now training from a CAMPEP-accredited medical physics pro-gram is compulsory to obtain ABR certification.These requirements have triggered a chain of events, rangingfrom detailed specification of the professional training require-ments, establishment of a number of Doctorate of Medical Physics(DMP) degree programs and creation of new residency training

The present issue of Acta Oncologica contains studies presented at the 15th Acta Oncologica Symposium, held in Aarhus, Denmark on June 13–16, 2017. The symposium was dedicated to aspects of Biology...

Background: For tumours near organs at risk, there is concern about unintended increase in biological dose from elevated linear energy transfer (LET) at the distal end of treatment fields. The objective of this study was therefore to investigate how different paediatric posterior fossa tumour locations impact LET and biological dose to the brainstem during intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Material and methods: Multiple IMPT plans were generated for four different simulated tumour locations relative to the brainstem for a five-year-old male patient. A prescribed dose of 59.4 Gy(RBE) was applied to the planning target volumes (PTVs). Plans with two lateral and one posterior non-coplanar fields were created, along with plans with modified field arrangements. The dose-averaged LET (LETd) and the physical dose × RBELET (D × RBELET), where RBELET=1+c × LETd, were calculated using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code. A scaling parameter c was applied to make the RBELET represent variations in the biological effect due to LET. Results: High LETd values surrounded parts of the PTV and encompassed portions of the brainstem. Mean LETd values in the brainstem were 3.2–6.6 keV/μm. The highest absolute brainstem LETd values were seen with the tumour located most distant from the brainstem, whereas lower and more homogeneous LETd values were seen when the tumour invaded the brainstem. In contrast, the highest mean D × RBELET values were found in the latter case (54.0 Gy(RBE)), while the case with largest distance between tumour and brainstem had a mean D × RBELET of 1.8 Gy(RBE). Conclusions: Using IMPT to treat posterior fossa tumours may result in high LETd values within the brainstem, particularly if the tumour volume is separated from the brainstem. However, the D × RBELET was greater for tumours that approached or invaded the brainstem. Changing field angles showed a reduction of LETd and D × RBELET in the brainstem.