Search

Background Treatment patterns for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) differ, but limited studies exist comparing them. This study examines differences in molecular profiling rates and treatment patterns in these populations, focusing on use of adjuvant, liver-directed, targeted, and investigational therapies. Methods This multicenter collaboration included patients with ICC or ECC treated at 1 of 8 participating institutions. Retrospective data were collected on risk factors, pathology, treatments, and survival. Comparative statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Among 1039 patients screened, 847 patients met eligibility (ICC = 611, ECC = 236). Patients with ECC were more likely than those with ICC to present with early stage disease (53.8% vs 28.0%), undergo surgical resection (55.1% vs 29.8%), and receive adjuvant chemoradiation (36.5% vs 4.2%) (all P Conclusions Patients with advanced ECC have low rates of molecular profiling, possibly in part because of insufficient tissue. They also have low rates of targeted therapy use and clinical trial enrollment. While these rates are higher in advanced ICC, the prognosis for both subtypes of cholangiocarcinoma remains poor, and a pressing need exists for new effective targeted therapies and broader access to clinical trials.

Purpose: Atezolizumab + bevacizumab is the new standard of care for systemic treatment-naïve, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This exploratory study investigated on-treatment alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response as a potential surrogate biomarker of prognosis for the combination therapy. Experimental Design: Data from Group A of the phase Ib GO30140 study were used to identify the optimal time for AFP measurement and AFP cutoffs to differentiate patients by their best confirmed response per independent review facility–assessed RECIST (IRF-RECIST) version 1.1: responders from nonresponders and patients with disease control from primary progressors. We applied these cutoffs to independent data from the atezolizumab + bevacizumab arm of the phase III IMbrave150 trial to distinguish patients based on (i) overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) per IRF-RECIST 1.1 and (ii) best confirmed response per IRF-RECIST 1.1. Results: We derived AFP cutoffs of ≥75% decrease and ≤10% increase from baseline at 6 weeks to identify responders and those who had disease control, respectively. These cutoffs had high sensitivity and specificity in GO30140. In IMbrave150 patients, sensitivity was 0.59 and specificity was 0.86 for the ≥75% decrease AFP cutoff; the sensitivity was 0.77 and specificity was 0.44 for the ≤10% increase AFP cutoff. Both AFP cutoffs were associated with longer OS and PFS, particularly in patients with hepatitis B virus etiology (HR < 0.5; P < 0.01). Conclusions: AFP response at 6 weeks after initiating treatment is a potential surrogate biomarker of prognosis for patients with HCC receiving atezolizumab + bevacizumab. See related commentary by Cappuyns and Llovet, p. 3405

Single-agent nivolumab showed durable responses, manageable safety, and promising survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the phase 1-2 CheckMate 040 study. We aimed to investigate nivolumab monotherapy compared with sorafenib monotherapy in the first-line setting for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.In this randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial done at medical centres across 22 countries and territories in Asia, Australasia, Europe, and North America, patients at least 18 years old with histologically confirmed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma not eligible for, or whose disease had progressed after, surgery or locoregional treatment; with no previous systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, with Child-Pugh class A and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, and regardless of viral hepatitis status were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice response system to receive nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02576509.Between Jan 11, 2016, and May 24, 2017, 743 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (nivolumab, n=371; sorafenib, n=372). At the primary analysis, the median follow-up for overall survival was 15·2 months (IQR 5·7-28·0) for the nivolumab group and 13·4 months (5·7-25·9) in the sorafenib group. Median overall survival was 16·4 months (95% CI 13·9-18·4) with nivolumab and 14·7 months (11·9-17·2) with sorafenib (hazard ratio 0·85 [95% CI 0·72-1·02]; p=0·075; minimum follow-up 22·8 months); the protocol-defined significance level of p=0·0419 was not reached. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (1 [1%] of 367 patients in the nivolumab group vs 52 [14%] of patients in the sorafenib group), aspartate aminotransferase increase (22 [6%] vs 13 [4%]), and hypertension (0 vs 26 [7%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 43 (12%) patients receiving nivolumab and 39 (11%) patients receiving sorafenib. Four deaths in the nivolumab group and one death in the sorafenib group were assessed as treatment related.First-line nivolumab treatment did not significantly improve overall survival compared with sorafenib, but clinical activity and a favourable safety profile were observed in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, nivolumab might be considered a therapeutic option for patients in whom tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs are contraindicated or have substantial risks.Bristol Myers Squibb in collaboration with Ono Pharmaceutical.

Introduction We conducted a systematic literature review to assess the utility of liver function assessments for predicting disease prognosis and response to systemic anticancer therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Methods This was a PRISMA-standard review and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021244588). MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched (March 24, 2021) to identify publications reporting the efficacy and/or safety of systemic anticancer therapy (vs any/no comparator) in liver-function-defined subgroups in phase 2 or 3 aHCC trials. Screening was completed by a single reviewer, with uncertainties resolved by a second reviewer and/or the authors. English-language full-text articles and congress abstracts were eligible for inclusion. Included publications were described and assessed for risk of bias using the GRADE methodology. Results Twenty (of 2579) screened publications were eligible; seven categorised liver function using the albumin–bilirubin system, nine using the Child–Pugh system, four using both. GRADE assessment classified ten, nine, and one publication(s) as reporting moderate-quality, low-quality, and very-low-quality evidence, respectively. Analyses of cross-trial trends of within-exposure arm analyses (active and control) reported a positive relationship between baseline liver function and overall survival and progression-free survival, supporting liver function as a prognostic marker in aHCC. There were also signals for a modest relationship between more preserved baseline liver function and extent of systemic treatment benefit, and with more preserved liver function and lower incidence of safety events. Conclusion This review supports liver function as a prognostic variable in aHCC, and highlights the value of a priori stratification of patients by baseline liver function in aHCC trials. The predictive value of liver function warrants further study. Findings were limited by the quality of available data.

Purpose:A novel single-dose regimen of 300 mg tremelimumab in combination with durvalumab [Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab (STRIDE)] has demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile in the phase I/II Study 22 (NCT02519348) and phase III HIMALAYA study (NCT03298451). This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, exposure–response, and exposure–pharmacodynamics relationships of tremelimumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).Patients and Methods:A previous tremelimumab population pharmacokinetic model was validated using data from parts 2 and 3 of Study 22. Exposure–response analyses explored relationships of tremelimumab exposure with efficacy and safety. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics relationships were evaluated using linear and nonlinear regression models.Results:The observed pharmacokinetics of tremelimumab in uHCC were consistent with predictions; no significant covariates were identified. Tremelimumab exposure was not significantly associated with adverse events, objective response rate, or progression-free survival. Overall survival (OS) was longer for patients with tremelimumab exposure, minimum serum drug concentration (Cmin1) ≥ median versus Cmin1 < median (18.99 months vs. 10.97 months), but this exposure-survival analysis might be confounded with baseline characteristics of albumin level and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, which had a significant impact on OS (P = 0.0004 and 0.0001, respectively). The predicted Cmin1 of tremelimumab in STRIDE regimen (12.9 μg/mL) was greater than the estimated concentration of tremelimumab eliciting half-maximal increases (EC50 = 5.24 μg/mL) in CD8+Ki67+ T-cell counts.Conclusions:Our findings support novel insights into tremelimumab pharmacokinetics and exposure–response relationships in HCC and support the clinical utility of the STRIDE regimen in patients with uHCC.

PURPOSE This phase I/II study evaluated tremelimumab (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 monoclonal antibody) and durvalumab (antiprogrammed death ligand-1 monoclonal antibody) as monotherapies and in combination for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including a novel regimen featuring a single, priming dose of tremelimumab (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02519348 ). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with HCC who had progressed on, were intolerant to, or refused sorafenib were randomly assigned to receive T300 + D (tremelimumab 300 mg plus durvalumab 1,500 mg [one dose each during the first cycle] followed by durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks), durvalumab monotherapy (1,500 mg once every 4 weeks), tremelimumab monotherapy (750 mg once every 4 weeks [seven doses] and then once every 12 weeks), or T75 + D (tremelimumab 75 mg once every 4 weeks plus durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks [four doses] followed by durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks). Safety was the primary end point. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 and overall survival; exploratory end points included circulating lymphocyte profiles. RESULTS A total of 332 patients were enrolled (T300 + D, n = 75; durvalumab, n = 104; tremelimumab, n = 69; and T75 + D, n = 84). Tolerability was acceptable across arms, with grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurring in 37.8%, 20.8%, 43.5%, and 24.4%, respectively. Confirmed ORRs (95% CI) were 24.0% (14.9 to 35.3), 10.6% (5.4 to 18.1), 7.2% (2.4 to 16.1), and 9.5% (4.2 to 17.9), respectively. An early expansion of CD8+ lymphocytes was associated with response across arms, with highest proliferating CD8+ lymphocyte levels occurring in the T300 + D arm. The median (95% CI) overall survival was 18.7 (10.8 to 27.3), 13.6 (8.7 to 17.6), 15.1 (11.3 to 20.5), and 11.3 (8.4 to 15.0) months in the T300 + D, durvalumab, tremelimumab, and T75 + D arms, respectively. CONCLUSION All regimens were found to be tolerable and clinically active; however, the T300 + D regimen demonstrated the most encouraging benefit-risk profile. The unique pharmacodynamic activity and association with ORR of the T300 + D regimen further support its continued evaluation in HCC.

Background Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and Child–Pugh B liver cirrhosis have poor prognosis and are underrepresented in clinical trials. The CELESTIAL trial, in which cabozantinib improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with HCC and Child–Pugh A liver cirrhosis at baseline, was evaluated for outcomes in patients who had Child–Pugh B cirrhosis at Week 8. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with previously treated advanced HCC. Child–Pugh B status was assessed by the investigator. Patients were randomised 2:1 to cabozantinib (60 mg once daily) or placebo. Results Fifty-one patients receiving cabozantinib and 22 receiving placebo had Child–Pugh B cirrhosis at Week 8. Safety and tolerability of cabozantinib for the Child–Pugh B subgroup were consistent with the overall population. For cabozantinib- versus placebo-treated patients, median OS from randomisation was 8.5 versus 3.8 months (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18–0.58), median PFS was 3.7 versus 1.9 months (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25–0.76), and best response was stable disease in 57% versus 23% of patients. Conclusions These encouraging results with cabozantinib support the initiation of prospective studies in patients with advanced HCC and Child–Pugh B liver function. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01908426.

Background Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade is an objective measure of liver function for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib is approved for patients with advanced HCC who have received prior sorafenib based on the phase 3 CELESTIAL trial (NCT01908426). Cabozantinib improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with previously treated HCC. Methods Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive cabozantinib 60 mg or placebo orally every day. Clinical outcomes in patients with ALBI grade 1 or 2 at baseline were evaluated in CELESTIAL. ALBI scores were retrospectively calculated based on baseline serum albumin and total bilirubin, with an ALBI grade of 1 defined as ≤ −2.60 score and a grade of 2 as a score of > −2.60 to ≤ −1.39. Results Cabozantinib improved OS and PFS versus placebo in both ALBI grade 1 (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI]: 0.63 [0.46–0.86] and 0.42 [0.32–0.56]) and ALBI grade 2 (HR [95% CI]: 0.84 [0.66–1.06] and 0.46 [0.37–0.58]) subgroups. Adverse events were consistent with those in the overall population. Rates of grade 3/4 adverse events associated with hepatic decompensation were generally low and were more common among patients in the ALBI grade 2 subgroup. Discussion These results provide initial support of cabozantinib in patients with advanced HCC irrespective of ALBI grade 1 or 2. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01908426.

Lessons Learned Androgen receptor as assessed by immunohistochemistry is expressed in a high proportion of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Enzalutamide at 160 mg orally daily is safe and tolerable in patients with advanced HCC but has no single-agent antitumor activity. Enzalutamide, a CYP3A4 inducer, at a standard dose of 160 mg reduces the exposure of sorafenib, a CYP3A4 substrate. Enzalutamide and sorafenib is safe and tolerable in patients with advanced HCC, but the addition of enzalutamide to sorafenib did not enhance the antitumor activity of sorafenib. Background Androgen receptor (AR) interference is deleterious to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in preclinical models. Methods This is a multicenter, phase Ib study of enzalutamide ± sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. In part 1, a 3 + 3 dose de-escalation design with expansion established the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of enzalutamide in patients in whom sorafenib treatment had failed. In part 2, a 3 + 3 dose escalation with expansion established the safety of enzalutamide with sorafenib in treatment-naive patients with HCC. Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), pharmacokinetics (PK), and determination of AR expression by immunohistochemistry. A 7-day run-in with sorafenib alone in part 2 allowed assessment of the impact of enzalutamide on sorafenib pharmacokinetics. Results In part 1, 16 patients received enzalutamide 160 mg daily. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred; 1 patient required dose reduction. Responses were not observed; median PFS and OS were 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6–3.6) and 7 (95% CI: 3.6 to not reached [NR]) months, respectively. In part 2, patients received sorafenib 400 mg daily (4) or twice a day (8) both with enzalutamide at the recommended phase II dose—no DLTs were observed. ORR was 10% (95% CI: 0.3–44.5), and median PFS and OS were 2.9 (95% CI: 1.6 to NR) and 6.7 (95% CI: 4.6 to NR) months, respectively. Enzalutamide reduced sorafenib exposure by 60%. Tumor AR expression did not associate with outcome. Conclusion Enzalutamide is ineffective in HCC; further development is not supported by this study.

Cabozantinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR, MET and the TAM (TYRO3, AXL, MER) family of kinase receptors. In addition to their role in tumor growth and angiogenesis, cabozantinib targets promote an immune-suppressive microenvironment. Cabozantinib is approved as single-agent therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who received prior sorafenib. Owing to its antitumor and immunomodulatory properties, cabozantinib is being developed in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Early studies of these combinations have shown promising antitumor activity and tolerability in patients with solid tumors. Here, we describe the rationale and design of COSMIC-312, a Phase III study evaluating the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab (anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) versus sorafenib for treatment-naive patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. ClinicalTrial.gov Registration: NCT03755791

BackgroundIsocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations occur in approximately 13% of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, a relatively uncommon cancer with a poor clinical outcome. The aim of this international phase 3 study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ivosidenib (AG-120)-a small-molecule targeted inhibitor of mutated IDH1-in patients with previously treated IDH1-mutant cholangiocarcinoma.MethodsThis multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study included patients from 49 hospitals in six countries aged at least 18 years with histologically confirmed, advanced, IDH1-mutant cholangiocarcinoma who had progressed on previous therapy, and had up to two previous treatment regimens for advanced disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, and a measurable lesion as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) with a block size of 6 and stratified by number of previous systemic treatment regimens for advanced disease to oral ivosidenib 500 mg or matched placebo once daily in continuous 28-day cycles, by means of an interactive web-based response system. Placebo to ivosidenib crossover was permitted on radiological progression per investigator assessment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by independent central review. The intention-to-treat population was used for the primary efficacy analyses. Safety was assessed in all patients who had received at least one dose of ivosidenib or placebo. Enrolment is complete; this study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02989857.FindingsBetween Feb 20, 2017, and Jan 31, 2019, 230 patients were assessed for eligibility, and as of the Jan 31, 2019 data cutoff date, 185 patients were randomly assigned to ivosidenib (n=124) or placebo (n=61). Median follow-up for progression-free survival was 6·9 months (IQR 2·8-10·9). Progression-free survival was significantly improved with ivosidenib compared with placebo (median 2·7 months [95% CI 1·6-4·2] vs 1·4 months [1·4-1·6]; hazard ratio 0·37; 95% CI 0·25-0·54; one-sided p

Cabozantinib has shown clinical activity in combination with checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumours. The COSMIC-312 trial assessed cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus sorafenib as first-line systemic treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.COSMIC-312 is an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial that enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to curative or locoregional therapy and previously untreated with systemic anticancer therapy at 178 centres in 32 countries. Patients with fibrolamellar carcinoma, sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma, or combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma were not eligible. Tumours involving major blood vessels, including the main portal vein, were permitted. Patients were required to have measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ and marrow function, and Child-Pugh class A. Previous resection, tumour ablation, radiotherapy, or arterial chemotherapy was allowed if more than 28 days before randomisation. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1:1) via a web-based interactive response system to cabozantinib 40 mg orally once daily plus atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks, sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily, or single-agent cabozantinib 60 mg orally once daily. Randomisation was stratified by disease aetiology, geographical region, and presence of extrahepatic disease or macrovascular invasion. Dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by a blinded independent radiology committee in the first 372 patients randomly assigned to the combination treatment of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab or sorafenib (progression-free survival intention-to-treat [ITT] population), and overall survival in all patients randomly assigned to cabozantinib plus atezolizumab or sorafenib (ITT population). Final progression-free survival and concurrent interim overall survival analyses are presented. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03755791.Analyses at data cut-off (March 8, 2021) included the first 837 patients randomly assigned between Dec 7, 2018, and Aug 27, 2020, to combination treatment of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab (n=432), sorafenib (n=217), or single-agent cabozantinib (n=188). Median follow-up was 15·8 months (IQR 14·5-17·2) in the progression-free survival ITT population and 13·3 months (10·5-16·0) in the ITT population. Median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (99% CI 5·6-8·3) in the combination treatment group versus 4·2 months (2·8-7·0) in the sorafenib group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·63, 99% CI 0·44-0·91, p=0·0012). Median overall survival (interim analysis) was 15·4 months (96% CI 13·7-17·7) in the combination treatment group versus 15·5 months (12·1-not estimable) in the sorafenib group (HR 0·90, 96% CI 0·69-1·18; p=0·44). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were alanine aminotransferase increase (38 [9%] of 429 patients in the combination treatment group vs six [3%] of 207 in the sorafenib group vs 12 [6%] of 188 in the single-agent cabozantinib group), hypertension (37 [9%] vs 17 [8%] vs 23 [12%]), aspartate aminotransferase increase (37 [9%] vs eight [4%] vs 18 [10%]), and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (35 [8%] vs 17 [8%] vs 16 [9%]); serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 78 (18%) patients in the combination treatment group, 16 (8%) patients in the sorafenib group, and 24 (13%) in the single-agent cabozantinib group. Treatment-related grade 5 events occurred in six (1%) patients in the combination treatment group (encephalopathy, hepatic failure, drug-induced liver injury, oesophageal varices haemorrhage, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and tumour lysis syndrome), one (1%) patient in the sorafenib group (general physical health deterioration), and one (1%) patient in the single-agent cabozantinib group (gastrointestinal haemorrhage).Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab might be a treatment option for select patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, but additional studies are needed.Exelixis and Ipsen.

Futibatinib, a highly selective, irreversible FGFR1–4 inhibitor, was evaluated in a large multihistology phase I dose-expansion trial that enrolled 197 patients with advanced solid tumors. Futibatinib demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 13.7%, with responses in a broad spectrum of tumors (cholangiocarcinoma and gastric, urothelial, central nervous system, head and neck, and breast cancer) bearing both known and previously uncharacterized FGFR1–3 aberrations. The greatest activity was observed in FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement–positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ORR, 25.4%). Some patients with acquired resistance to a prior FGFR inhibitor also experienced responses with futibatinib. Futibatinib demonstrated a manageable safety profile. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were hyperphosphatemia (81.2%), diarrhea (33.5%), and nausea (30.4%). These results formed the basis for ongoing futibatinib phase II/III trials and demonstrate the potential of genomically selected early-phase trials to help identify molecular subsets likely to benefit from targeted therapy. Significance: This phase I dose-expansion trial demonstrated clinical activity and tolerability of the irreversible FGFR1–4 inhibitor futibatinib across a broad spectrum of FGFR-aberrant tumors. These results formed the rationale for ongoing phase II/III futibatinib trials in cholangiocarcinoma, breast cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, and a genomically selected disease-agnostic population. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 275

TPS817 Background: Metastatic disease remains a consistent challenge for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been FDA approved for several GI indications. Still, patients will progress on these therapies, either immediately or after initial response. Palliative radiation therapy (RT) is an effective treatment that can be delivered to symptomatic metastases. It also has been reported to lead to an abscopal effect, which is an induction of response in a distant tumor. This is thought to result from increased tumor immunogenicity, tumor microenvironment modulation, and immune cell recruitment. Thus, palliative RT could not only relieve symptoms, but also potentially reinvigorate the immune response, prolong ICI efficacy, and delay next-line systemic therapy that carries risks of unknown efficacy and tolerability. Ongoing studies seek to elucidate prognostic and predictive biomarkers of the abscopal effect. However, cohorts of patients with GI malignancies are limited, so there remains a need for research in combining RT and immunotherapy in the context of metastatic GI cancer. ARM-GI aims to study the radiation-augmented immune response in patients with metastatic GI cancers progressing on immunotherapy. Methods: ARM-GI is a phase 2, single arm study. Key eligibility criteria include confirmed metastatic GI malignancy, progressive disease per RECIST v1.1 on any ICI, and at least 2 metastases, one of which can be safely left unirradiated. The target prescription dose is 30 Gy in 5 fractions to symptomatic sites through intensity modulated RT or stereotactic body RT. Patients will continue the same immunotherapy after RT and be evaluated per RECIST v1.1 longitudinally. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include ORR per iRECIST, progression free survival, overall survival, local control in radiated lesion(s), effect of distant radiation on unirradiated target lesions, incidence of new metastatic lesions, safety by CTCAE v5.0, and time to new systemic therapy. The study will enroll 28 patients, with recruitment ongoing. Serial peripheral blood samples are collected for exploratory studies that will analyze for association with disease response and quantification of changes in circulating immune cell subsets after RT compared to baseline. Clinical trial information: NCT04221893 .

TPS630 Background: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is among the most common types and leading causes of cancer death globally, and the incidence is on the rise. For patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in combination with anti-angiogenic agents or other ICI improve survival compared with tyrosine kinase inhibition. Though ICI-based regimens can achieve prolonged responses in some patients and prolong overall survival, only a subset of patients achieve durable responses. There is an urgent need for strategies to overcome primary and acquired resistance. Many of these patients have symptomatic sites of disease which could benefit from local palliative radiotherapy. Radiotherapy also has the potential to elicit an abscopal immune response when combined with ICI. We hypothesize that combining Radiation Treatment (RT) with Durvalumab or the combination of Durvalumab + Tremelimumab (combination D+T in STRIDE regimen showed OS improvement in HIMALAYA trial in 1st line HCC) will achieve a meaningful response rate in advanced HCC patients after progression on other ICI-based therapies. Methods: This is an open label, single center, two-arm, non-comparative phase II trial. Key eligibility criteria are; histologically-diagnosed HCC with progression during or after prior PD-(L)1 checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy and at least 1 RECIST 1.1-measurable tumor present which has not received RT or other local therapy prior to enrollment, ECOG 0-1, and Child Pugh score of A, B7, or B8. Patients are assigned sequentially to either single-agent durvalumab initiated starting 3 to 10 days after completing RT (25 Gy in 5 fractions to 1-5 sites of disease), at fixed dose of 1500 mg IV every 28 days, or a single fixed dose of tremelimumab of 300 mg IV administered on Day 1, initiated within 3-10 days of completing RT, in combination with durvalumab at fixed dose of 1500 mg IV every 28 days; for up to 24 months or until confirmed radiographic progression. The primary end point is overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints include proportion of participants with adverse events, overall survival, progression free survival and duration of response. Exploratory endpoints include profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cell immune cells and plasma biomarkers. We plan to accrue 30 patients to this study, 15 to each Arm, to evaluate ORR which would allow us to detect at least a 20% ORR, which would be a clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy in this population with otherwise poor treatment options assuming a statistical power of 87% and a directional 5% statistical significance level based upon an exact binomial test. The trial is open and enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT04430452 .

Introduction: Cabozantinib, an inhibitor of MET, AXL, and VEGF receptors, significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this exploratory analysis, outcomes were evaluated according to plasma biomarker levels. Methods: Baseline plasma levels were evaluated for MET, AXL, VEGFR2, HGF, GAS6, VEGF-A, PlGF, IL-8, EPO, ANG2, IGF-1, VEGF-C, and c-KIT for 674/707 randomized patients; and Week 4 levels were evaluated for MET, AXL, VEGFR2, HGF, GAS6, VEGF-A, PlGF, IL-8, and EPO for 614 patients. OS and PFS were analyzed by baseline levels as dichotomized or continuous variables and by on-treatment changes at Week 4 as continuous variables; biomarkers were considered potentially prognostic if p < 0.05 and predictive if p < 0.05 for the interaction between treatment and the biomarker. Multivariable analyses adjusting for clinical covariates were also performed. Results: In the placebo group, high levels of MET, HGF, GAS6, IL-8, and ANG2 and low levels of IGF-1 were associated with shorter OS in univariate and multivariable analyses; these associations were also observed for MET, IL-8, and ANG2 in the cabozantinib group. Hazard ratios for OS and PFS favored cabozantinib over the placebo at low and high baseline levels for all biomarkers. No baseline biomarkers were predictive of a treatment benefit. Cabozantinib promoted pharmacodynamic changes in several biomarkers, including increases in VEGF-A, PlGF, AXL, and GAS6 levels and decreases in VEGFR2 and HGF levels; these changes were not associated with OS or PFS. Conclusion: Cabozantinib improved OS and PFS versus placebo at high and low baseline concentrations for all biomarkers analyzed. Low baseline levels of MET, HGF, GAS6, IL-8, and ANG2 and high levels of IGF-1 were identified as potential favorable prognostic biomarkers for survival in previously treated advanced HCC. Although cabozantinib promoted pharmacodynamic changes in several biomarkers, these changes were not associated with survival.

Multiple systemic therapy options now exist for unresectable and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Atezolizumab + bevacizumab is the preferred first-line regimen, and although many second-line treatment options have recently been added to the NCCN Guidelines, none have been studied after atezolizumab + bevacizumab (all post-sorafenib), and therefore optimal sequence has yet to be established. Multiple new combination regimens with immune checkpoint inhibitors are also being studied in advanced-stage HCC. In biliary tract cancer (BTC), gemcitabine + cisplatin remains the preferred first-line regimen. FOLFOX is the preferred regimen in the second line. Multiple targeted therapy options are now available in second-line BTC for patients with tumors harboring specific mutations, and these therapeutic targets may guide future treatment sequence and combinations for BTCs.

Background: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and Child-Pugh B liver cirrhosis have poor prognosis and are underrepresented in clinical trials. The CELESTIAL trial, in which cabozantinib improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with HCC and Child-Pugh A liver cirrhosis at baseline, was evaluated for outcomes in patients who had Child-Pugh B cirrhosis at Week 8. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with previously treated advanced HCC. Child-Pugh B status was assessed by the investigator. Patients were randomised 2:1 to cabozantinib (60 mg once daily) or placebo. Results: Fifty-one patients receiving cabozantinib and 22 receiving placebo had Child-Pugh B cirrhosis at Week 8. Safety and tolerability of cabozantinib for the Child-Pugh B subgroup were consistent with the overall population. For cabozantinib- versus placebo-treated patients, median OS from randomisation was 8.5 versus 3.8 months (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18–0.58), median PFS was 3.7 versus 1.9 months (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25–0.76), and best response was stable disease in 57% versus 23% of patients. Conclusions: These encouraging results with cabozantinib support the initiation of prospective studies in patients with advanced HCC and Child-Pugh B liver function.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01908426

Background Previous studies report increasing cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) incidence up to 2015. This contemporary retrospective analysis of CCA incidence and mortality in the US from 2001-2017 assessed whether CCA incidence continued to increase beyond 2015. Patients and Methods Patients (≥18 years) with CCA were identified in the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 cancer registry (International Classification of Disease for Oncology [ICD-O]-3 codes: intrahepatic [iCCA], C221; extrahepatic [eCCA], C240, C241, C249). Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) cases were identified (ICD-O-3: C809; 8140/2, 8140/3, 8141/3, 8143/3, 8147/3) because of potential misclassification as iCCA. Results Forty-thousand-and-thirty CCA cases (iCCA, n=13,174; eCCA, n=26,821; iCCA and eCCA, n=35) and 32,980 CUP cases were analyzed. From 2001-2017, CCA, iCCA, and eCCA incidence (per 100 000 person-years) increased 43.8% (3.08 to 4.43), 148.8% (0.80 to 1.99), and 7.5% (2.28 to 2.45), respectively. In contrast, CUP incidence decreased 54.4% (4.65 to 2.12). CCA incidence increased with age, with greatest increase among younger patients (18-44 years, 81.0%). Median overall survival from diagnosis was 8, 6, 9, and 2 months for CCA, iCCA, eCCA, and CUP. From 2001-2016, annual mortality rate declined for iCCA (57.1% to 41.2%) and generally remained stable for eCCA (40.9% to 37.0%) and for CUP (64.3% to 68.6%). Conclusions CCA incidence continued to increase from 2001-2017, with greater increase in iCCA versus eCCA, whereas CUP incidence decreased. The divergent CUP versus iCCA incidence trends, with overall greater absolute change in iCCA incidence, provide evidence for a true increase in iCCA incidence that may not be wholly attributable to CUP reclassification.

Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is upregulated in nearly half of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors and is associated with poor prognosis. In preclinical models of HCC, the combination of mTOR pathway inhibition with the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib improves treatment efficacy. A prior phase I study of the allosteric mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus combined with sorafenib demonstrated acceptable safety at the recommended phase II dose. Methods: We conducted a single-arm, multicenter phase II trial of the combination of temsirolimus 10 mg intravenously weekly plus sorafenib 200 mg b.i.d. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP) with efficacy target of median TTP of at least 6 months; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, safety, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) tumor marker response. Next-generation tumor sequencing was performed as an exploratory endpoint. Results: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled, including 48% with hepatitis C virus infection and 28% with hepatitis B virus; 86% had Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage C disease. Among 28 patients evaluable for efficacy, the median TTP was 3.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2, 5.3) months, with 14% of patients achieving TTP of at least 6 months. The median OS was 8.8 (95% CI: 6.8, 14.8) months. There were no complete or partial responses; 75% of patients had stable disease as best response. AFP decline by at least 50% was associated with prolonged TTP and OS. Serious adverse events occurred in 21%; the most common treatment-related adverse events of CTCAE grade 3 or higher were hypophosphatemia (36%), thrombocytopenia (14%), and rash (11%). There were no grade 5 events attributed to sorafenib or temsirolimus. Tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in a subgroup of 24 patients with adequate tumor samples. Tumor mTOR pathway mutations were identified in 42%. There was no association between tumor mutation profile and OS or TTP. Conclusions: The combination of temsirolimus and sorafenib demonstrated acceptable safety but did not achieve the target threshold for efficacy in this phase II study. Tumor NGS including the presence of mTOR pathway mutations was not associated with treatment response in an exploratory subgroup analysis.

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have historically had few options and faced extremely poor prognoses if their disease progressed after standard-of-care tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Recently, the standard of care for HCC has been transformed as a combination of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) atezolizumab plus the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab was shown to offer improved overall survival in the first-line setting. Immunotherapy has demonstrated safety and efficacy in later lines of therapy as well, and ongoing trials are investigating novel combinations of ICIs and TKIs, in addition to interventions earlier in the course of disease or in combination with liver-directed therapies. Because HCC usually develops against a background of cirrhosis, immunotherapy for liver tumors is complex and oncologists need to account for both immunological and hepatological considerations when developing a treatment plan for their patients. To provide guidance to the oncology community on important concerns for the immunotherapeutic care of HCC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The expert panel drew on the published literature as well as their clinical experience to develop recommendations for healthcare professionals on these important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for HCC, including diagnosis and staging, treatment planning, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and patient quality of life (QOL) considerations. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to give guidance to cancer care providers treating patients with HCC.

More than a decade ago, sorafenib became the first systemic therapy that conferred a meaningful survival benefit in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.1 Since then, no treatment had...

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide and confers a poor prognosis. Beyond standard systemic therapy with multikinase inhibitors, recent studies demonstrate the potential for robust and durable responses from immune checkpoint inhibition in subsets of HCC patients across disease etiologies. The majority of HCC arises in the context of chronic inflammation and from within a fibrotic liver, with many cases associated with hepatitis virus infections, toxins, and fatty liver disease. Many patients also have concomitant cirrhosis which is associated with both local and systemic immune deficiency. Furthermore, the liver is an immunologic organ in itself, which may enhance or suppress the immune response to cancer arising within it. Here, we explore the immunobiology of the liver from its native state to chronic inflammation, fibrosis, cirrhosis and then to cancer, and summarize how this unique microenvironment may affect the response to immunotherapy.

Background Nivolumab demonstrated durable responses and safety in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis in the CheckMate 040 trial, with rates of hepatotoxicity that were similar to those of non-HCC populations. To the authors' knowledge, the safety and efficacy of nivolumab has not been established in patients with Child-Pugh class B (CPB) cirrhosis, a population with limited therapeutic options and a poor prognosis. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective case series of patients with advanced HCC and CPB cirrhosis who were treated with nivolumab and enrolled in the University of California at San Francisco Hepatobiliary Tissue Bank and Registry. Safety endpoints included rates of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.03]) and serious AEs, immune-related AEs (irAE), steroid requirement, and discontinuation. Efficacy endpoints included time on treatment, the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Results A total of 18 patients were included, with 72% of them (13 of 18 patients) previously treated with sorafenib. The majority of patients (94%; 17 of 18 patients) experienced a grade ≥3 AE, with treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs reported in 28% of patients (5 of 18 patients). irAEs were reported to occur in approximately 50% of patients (9 of 18 patients), and 28% (5 of 18 patients) required steroids. Treatment-related AEs required discontinuation in 4 patients (22%). The median time on treatment was 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.9 months to upper bound not estimable). The objective response rate was 17% (3 of 18 patients), including 2 partial responses and 1 complete response. The median overall survival from the time of nivolumab initiation was 5.9 months (95% CI, 3 months to upper bound not estimable), with a median progression-free survival of 1.6 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.5 months). Conclusions Patients with CPB HCC experienced high rates of AEs, although the frequency of irAEs was similar to that of patients with Child-Pugh class A HCC in the CheckMate 040 trial. A subset of patients experienced prolonged tumor responses. Nivolumab warrants further study in patients with CPB HCC.

In the phase 3 CheckMate 459 study (NCT02576509), first-line nivolumab (NIVO) treatment demonstrated higher overall response rate (ORR) and a favorable safety profile, but no significant improvement in overall survival (OS) compared with sorafenib (SORA) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we report exploratory biomarker analyses from the trial with a potential to identify patients who may benefit from NIVO. Archival or fresh tumor samples were collected before treatment and subjected to whole exome sequencing (WES) (400/730: 55%) for genetic alterations including high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and WNT/beta-catenin pathway components, as well as whole transcriptome RNA sequencing (469/730: 64%) for analysis of individual genes, inflammation signatures and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Associations between biomarkers and best overall response (BOR), progression free survival (PFS) and OS were evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 33·6 months. RNA sequencing analysis demonstrated that high Gajewski inflammation gene signature score of ≥0.47 (30% of tumors) was associated with an improvement in BOR (p=0.0043), PFS (p=0.00065) and OS (p=0.0073) within the NIVO arm only. Upon comparison of NIVO versus SORA, only patients whose tumors were inflammation high demonstrated NIVO benefit for BOR (p=0.017), PFS (p=0.0063) and OS (p=0.037). Responses to NIVO were associated with higher expression of CD8A, CD8B, PDCD1 (PD-1) and other inflammation-associated genes within the tumor (false discovery rate, FDR Citation Format: Jaclyn Neely, Jin Yao, Masatoshi Kudo, Richard S. Finn, Bruno Sangro, Ignacio Melero, Anthony El-Khoueiry, Marina Tschaika, Damir Begic, Ashwin Sama, Parul Doshi, Thomas Yau, Robin Kate Kelley. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses related to the clinical efficacy of first-line nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma from the phase 3 CheckMate 459 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2145.

3059 Background: Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) is a transmembrane protein overexpressed on cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and is abundantly present in many epithelial cancers, suggesting FAP is an attractive imaging and therapeutic target. FAP-2286 is a cyclic peptide that binds to FAP and is currently being evaluated as a radioligand therapy to treat patients (pts) with FAP-positive solid tumors. The role of 68Ga-FAP-2286 as a diagnostic agent is unknown. We present an interim analysis of the ability of 68Ga-FAP-2286 to detect metastatic disease across multiple cancer types. Methods: This is a first in human Phase I/II study of 68Ga-FAP-2286 (NCT04621435) with a planned total enrollment of 65 pts across 3 cohorts: dosimetry cohort (n = 5), cohort with RECIST measurable disease (n = 30) and a cohort at risk for metastases without measurable disease (n = 30). By the cutoff date of February 12, 2022, 27 pts were enrolled (3 in cohort 1, 15 in cohort 2 and 9 in cohort 3). For each pt, the five largest lesions were included for analysis, and for each lesion, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the 68Ga-FAP-2286 and the size (short axis for lymph nodes) were documented. In pts who had an available FDG PET performed within 8 weeks of 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET, uptake on the two scans was compared. Results: Of the 27 enrolled pts, 9 had bladder cancer, 5 sarcoma, 4 head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCCA), 3 breast cancer (BC), and 3 castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Most pts (89%, 24/27) had tumors positive for uptake on 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET, including 30 lesions < 1.5 cm, and 17 less than 1.0 cm. 16 pts had a paired FDG PET. In these pts, the average SUVmax on 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET was 244% higher than on FDG PET. Only two pts had higher uptake on FDG PET than on 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET (HNSCCA and DSRCT). The highest relative uptake was seen in 2 pts with BC (both 3.4 times higher on 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET); the average SUVmax in BC was 16.6. The lowest uptake on 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET was CRPC with an average SUVmax of 7.0. Sarcoma had variable uptake with one pt having an SUVmax of 4.5 (Ewing’s), while two pts had an SUVmax over 30 (both undifferentiated pleomorphic). Although sarcoma had high uptake on 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET, it was similar to FDG PET uptake across the 5 pts (ratio to FDG PET = 1.0). Conclusions: 68Ga-FAP-2286 is a promising imaging agent across cancers, although its benefit is not seen equally. BC had the highest absolute uptake and highest relative uptake compared to FDG PET; prostate cancer had the lowest uptake. Further work should be undertaken to define the settings where 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET may inform clinical decision making, and which pts may benefit from FAP-targeted radioligand therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04621435.

4009 Background: Survival outcomes are historically poor in patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic iCCA, with median overall survival (mOS) times of approximately 1 year with first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin and approximately 6 months with second-line chemotherapy. Futibatinib, a highly selective, irreversible FGFR1–4 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy with durable responses in pts with iCCA harboring FGFR2 fusion/rearrangements in the pivotal FOENIX-CCA2 phase 2 study (NCT02052778). At the primary analysis of this trial (data cutoff: October 1, 2020), an objective response rate (ORR) of 41.7% was observed, with a median duration of response (mDOR) of 9.7 mo. Here, we report updated efficacy (including mature OS data) and safety data from the final analysis with an additional 8 mo of follow-up. Methods: FOENIX-CCA2 was a single-arm phase 2 study that enrolled pts with advanced/metastatic iCCA with FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement and progressive disease (PD) after ≥1 prior treatment (tx; including gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy). Pts received futibatinib 20 mg once daily until PD/intolerability. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST v1.1 by independent central review. Secondary endpoints were DOR, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), OS, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Results: At the time of the final data cutoff (May 29, 2021), median follow-up was 25.0 mo, and 96/103 pts (93%) had discontinued tx. The median number of tx cycles was 13.0 for a median tx duration of 9.1 mo. The confirmed ORR was 41.7% (43/103) and thereby the same as of the primary analysis, as was the DCR (at 82.5%). The ORR was consistent across pt subgroups. The mDOR was 9.5 mo, and 74% of responses lasted ≥6 mo. mPFS was 8.9 mo, with a 12-mo PFS rate of 35.4%. Mature mOS was 20.0 mo, with a 12-mo OS rate of 73.1% . No new safety signals were identified. Common tx-related adverse events (TRAEs) included hyperphosphatemia (85%), alopecia (33%), dry mouth (30%), diarrhea (28%), dry skin (27%), and fatigue (25%). TRAEs resulted in tx discontinuation in 4 pts (4%). No tx-related deaths occurred. Quality of life was maintained from baseline to tx cycle 13. Conclusions: Findings from the final analysis of FOENIX-CCA2 confirm the results of the primary analysis and reinforce the durable efficacy and continued tolerability of futibatinib in previously treated pts with advanced/metastatic iCCA harboring FGFR2 fusion/rearrangements. Mature OS data were consistent with data from the primary analysis and far exceed historical data in this patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT02052778.

2501 Background: The immunoregulatory cytokine IL-27 upregulates inhibitory immune checkpoint receptors (eg, PD-L1, TIGIT) and downregulates proinflammatory cytokines (eg, IFNγ, TNFα). SRF388 is a fully human IgG1 blocking antibody to IL-27 with potential to promote immune activation in the tumor microenvironment. A phase 1 study was conducted to establish the preliminary safety of SRF388 and to identify recommended phase 2 doses (RP2D) suitable for monotherapy and combination expansions (NCT04374877). Methods: The dose-escalation study (accelerated single patient followed by standard 3+3) enrolled patients (pts) with advanced treatment-refractory solid tumors. Upon RP2D selection, monotherapy and combination expansions opened for treatment-refractory clear cell renal cell cancer (ccRCC), hepatocellular cancer (HCC), and non-small cell lung cancer. SRF388 was administered IV every 4 weeks (wks) as monotherapy and every 3 wks with pembrolizumab. Tumor response was assessed by RECIST1.1. Results: The monotherapy dose-escalation enrolled 29 pts with doses ranging from 0.003 to 20 mg/kg. Median age was 64 years. Most pts were female (62%) with ECOG PS of 1 (72%). Approximately 80% had prior PD-(L)1 blockade, and 48% had ≥4 prior therapies. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 21%, and all were low grade. Fatigue was the only TRAE reported in ≥10% (n = 3). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) or Grade ≥3 TRAEs were observed. Median time on study was 9 wks (range 0–59). One patient with highly treatment-refractory NSCLC experienced a confirmed partial response (PR) at 8 wks that was durable for 20 wks. Nine pts (31%) experienced disease stabilization at 8 wks, with 6 of 9 exhibiting durable disease control at 6 months. Of the 7 pts with ccRCC in the dose-escalation portion of the trial, 3 (43%) experienced durable disease control for ≥20 wks (range: 20-32). With doses up to 20 mg/kg, SRF388 PK remain linear with an estimated T1/2 of 10-12 days. PK characteristics and safety profile support dosing every 3 or 4 wks. Based on safety, tolerability, PK, peripheral pSTAT1 inhibition, and preliminary efficacy, 10 mg/kg was selected as the RP2D. Both the pembrolizumab safety cohort (n = 10) and Stage 1 of the ccRCC monotherapy expansion (n = 17) have fully enrolled. Of the 10 evaluable pts with ccRCC, 1 confirmed monotherapy PR has been reported, enabling Stage 2 initiation. Changes in several serum cytokines and chemokines were observed after SRF388 administration, including expected increase in circulating IL-27 levels. Conclusions: Results of IL-27 pathway blockade with a first-in-class therapeutic demonstrates that SRF388 has good tolerability with encouraging preliminary antitumor activity as a monotherapy. Updated data, including safety and clinical outcomes as well as correlative biomarker analyses, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04374877.

Background Preclinical data suggest that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor (TGF)‐β signaling interact to stimulate angiogenesis and suppress antitumor immune responses. Thus, combined inhibition of both pathways may offer greater antitumor activity compared with VEGF‐targeted antiangiogenic monotherapy against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods This is a multicenter, open‐label, phase 1b study of galunisertib, an inhibitor of TGF‐β receptor 1, and ramucirumab, an anti‐VEGF receptor 2 antibody, in patients with advanced HCC aiming to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), antitumor efficacy, and plasma alpha‐fetoprotein and TGF‐β kinetics. Dose escalation employed a 3 + 3 design. Patients received galunisertib at 80 mg (cohort 1) or 150 mg (cohort 2) orally twice a day on days 1–14 of a 28‐day cycle combined with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. Results Eight patients were enrolled: three in cohort 1 and five in cohort 2 (two patients were unevaluable due to rapid disease progression and replaced). No dose‐limiting toxicities were observed. Treatment‐related adverse events (AEs) of any grade in ≥2 patients included nausea (25%) and vomiting (25%). There was one Grade 3 treatment‐related AE, a cerebrovascular accident possibly related to ramucirumab. Galunisertib exposure was dose‐proportional and not affected by ramucirumab. The RECIST version 1.1 objective response rate and disease control rate were 0% and 12.5%, respectively. Conclusion Combination therapy was safe and tolerable and displayed favorable PK. The MTD was established at galunisertib at 150 mg orally twice a day and ramucirumab 8 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. The results do not support the preclinical hypothesis that blocking TGFβ signaling enhances efficacy of VEGF‐targeted therapy; thus further clinical development was halted for the combination of galunisertib and ramucirumab., The combination of galunisertib (up to 150 mg twice as day) and ramucirumab 8 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks (standard dose) was safe and tolerable and displayed favorable pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The results do not support the preclinical hypothesis that blocking transforming growth factor‐beta signaling enhances efficacy of VEGF‐targeted therapy; thus further clinical development was halted for the combination of galunisertib and ramucirumab.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rising in incidence and remains a leading cause of cancer-related death. After a decade of disappointing trials following the approval of sorafenib for patients with advanced HCC, a number of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and monoclonal antibodies targeting angiogenesis and immune checkpoints have recently been approved. The phase 3 CELESTIAL trial demonstrated improved progression-free and overall survival with the TKI cabozantinib compared to placebo, supporting it as a treatment option for patients with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib. Cabozantinib blocks multiple key pathways of HCC pathogenesis, including VEGFR, MET, and the TAM (TYRO3, AXL, MER) family of receptor kinases, and promotes an immune-permissive tumor microenvironment. Here, we review the mechanisms of action of cabozantinib, including effects on tumor growth and its immunomodulatory properties, providing pre-clinical rationale for combination strategies with checkpoint inhibitors. We discuss the design and outcomes of CELESTIAL including improved survival across subgroups defined by age, disease etiology, baseline AFP level, prior therapies (including duration of prior sorafenib), and tumor burden. Cabozantinib had a manageable safety profile with dose modification. Studies combining cabozantinib with atezolizumab (COSMIC-312) and durvalumab (CAMILLA) in the first and second-line settings are ongoing, as well as a neoadjuvant study of cabozantinib with nivolumab. Future investigations are warranted to define the use of cabozantinib in patients with Child-Pugh B liver function and identify markers predictive of clinical benefit. The role of cabozantinib in HCC continues to evolve with an anticipated role in immunotherapy combinations.

ObjectiveIn the phase 3 CELESTIAL trial, cabozantinib improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This subgroup analysis evaluated cabozantinib in patients who had received sorafenib as the only prior systemic therapy.MethodsCELESTIAL randomised (2:1) patients with advanced HCC and Child-Pugh class A liver function to treatment with cabozantinib (60 mg daily) or placebo. Eligibility required prior treatment with sorafenib, and patients could have received ≤2 prior systemic regimens. The primary endpoint was OS. Outcomes in patients who had received sorafenib as the only prior therapy were analysed by duration of prior sorafenib (

Background No trials have compared cabozantinib and regorafenib for the second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Objectives Conduct a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of the efficacy and safety of second-line cabozantinib and regorafenib in patients with advanced HCC and disease progression after prior sorafenib. Methods The CELESTIAL and RESORCE trials were used for indirect comparison of second-line cabozantinib and regorafenib in advanced HCC. Population-level data were available for RESORCE, individual patient data (IPD) for CELESTIAL. To align with RESORCE, the CELESTIAL population was limited to patients who received first-line sorafenib only. To minimize potential effect-modifying population differences, the CELESTIAL IPD were weighted to balance the distribution of clinically relevant baseline characteristics with those of RESORCE. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated for the matching-adjusted second-line CELESTIAL population and compared with those for RESORCE using weighted Kaplan-Meier curves and parametric modeling. Rates of grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) affecting > 5% of patients in any study arm were compared. Results In the matching-adjusted second-line populations (CELESTIAL, effective sample size = 266; RESORCE, n = 573), median (95% confidence interval) OS was similar for cabozantinib and regorafenib (11.4 [8.9–17.0] versus 10.6 [9.1–12.1] months; p = 0.3474, log-rank test). Median PFS was longer for cabozantinib than regorafenib (5.6 [4.9–7.3] versus 3.1 [2.8–4.2] months; p = 0.0005, log-rank test). There was a trend for lower rates of some grade 3/4 TEAEs with regorafenib than with cabozantinib, which may reflect the exclusion of sorafenib-intolerant patients from RESORCE but not from CELESTIAL, a difference that the MAIC methods could not remove. Only diarrhea rates were statistically significantly lower for regorafenib (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusions Cabozantinib may achieve similar OS and prolonged PFS compared with regorafenib in patients with progressive advanced HCC after prior sorafenib. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01378-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users., Plain Language Summary Cabozantinib and regorafenib are treatments approved for some patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a type of liver cancer, after disease progression despite prior sorafenib treatment. Cabozantinib, regorafenib and sorafenib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), meaning that they slow cancer progression by targeting specific ways that tumors grow. Cabozantinib and regorafenib offer benefits to patients compared with placebo (i.e., no treatment) for those who have progressed despite sorafenib treatment. No clinical studies have compared cabozantinib and regorafenib directly. This study compared the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib and regorafenib using data from trials of each drug versus placebo: CELESTIAL for cabozantinib and RESORCE for regorafenib. These two trials were similar—both involved patients with progressive advanced HCC who had received previous cancer treatment. There were some important differences, but these were minimized using statistical methods (matching and adjustments/“weighting”) allowing outcomes to be meaningfully compared. One difference that could not be removed by the statistical methods was that patients who were intolerant to prior sorafenib were excluded from RESORCE but were eligible for the CELESTIAL trial. In the otherwise matched populations, treatment with cabozantinib was associated with similar overall survival and significantly longer progression-free survival than regorafenib. Rates of diarrhea were significantly lower for regorafenib than cabozantinib, suggesting that regorafenib may be better tolerated, but this may reflect the exclusion of sorafenib-intolerant patients from RESORCE. These findings cannot replace a head-to-head study, but may help in guiding decision-making between cabozantinib and regorafenib in patients with progressive advanced HCC after soraftenib treatment. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01378-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

444 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have limited activity as monotherapy in unselected patients with ABC; the objective response rate (ORR) of PEM was 5.8% in the multicenter phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 trial. GM-CSF modulates immune cells including monocytes and the innate immune response and has demonstrated safety and prolonged survival (OS) in combination with ipilimumab in melanoma. This phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEM in combination with GM-CSF in ABC. Methods: Single-center, phase 2 trial with Simon’s 2-stage design and expansion cohort (EC) (NCT02703714). Key eligibility: ABC with progression/intolerance on ≥ 1 standard therapy, no prior ICI, bilirubin ≤1.5xULN. Treatment: PEM 200 mg IV Q21 days plus 2 cycles of GM-CSF 250 µg SC D1-14 Q21 days in cycles 2 and 3 (Stage 1 and EC) or in cycles 1 and 2 (Stage 2). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1, H0 5% vs. H1 20%. Key secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival (PFS), OS, PD-L1 expression. Exploratory endpoints included relationship between efficacy outcomes and anatomic subsite, risk factors, and tumor genotype. Results: Overall, 42 patients enrolled between 5/2016-12/2019: n = 9 in Stage 1, n = 18 in Stage 2, and n = 15 in EC. Overall: median age 61; female 67%; intrahepatic (ICC) 67%, extrahepatic (ECC) 26%, gallbladder (GBC) 7%; stage IV 90%; hepatitis B/C virus positive (HBV/HCV+) 24%; microsatellite instability (MSI-H)/stable (MSS)/unknown n = 1/35/6. Immune-related (ir)AE occurred in 69%, grade 3/4 treatment-related (tr)AE in 10%, all-cause serious (S)AE in 36%, and trSAE in 7%. ORR was 12% (95% CI: 4, 26), with median PFS of 63 days (95% CI: 55, 125), PFS at 6 months in 27% (95% CI: 14, 43), and median OS 3of 93 days (95% CI: 243, 573). There was no significant difference in ORR, PFS, or OS by anatomic subsite or tumor PD-L1 expression; HBV/HCV+ showed trends toward higher ORR (30% vs 6%, p = 0.08) and longer median PFS (276 vs 63 days, p = 0.06) and OS (1033 vs 323 days, p = 0.052). Conclusions: The combination of PEM plus GM-CSF was safe and well-tolerated with higher ORR than expected for PEM monotherapy in a predominantly MSS ABC population but did not meet target ORR threshold for efficacy. ORR and median PFS and OS were highest in patients with underlying HBV or HCV infection. Immune profiling of on-treatment biopsies and peripheral blood are ongoing to ascertain influence of both PEM and GM-CSF on circulating and tumor immune microenvironment. Clinical trial information: NCT02703714.

379 Background: A single priming dose of T (anti-CTLA-4) added to D (anti-PD-L1) in the STRIDE (Single T Regular Interval D) regimen, formerly T300+D, showed encouraging clinical activity and limited toxicity in a phase 2 uHCC study (Study 22, NCT02519348), suggesting single exposure to T is sufficient to improve upon D activity. HIMALAYA (NCT03298451) evaluated the efficacy and safety of STRIDE or D vs sorafenib (S) in uHCC. Methods: HIMALAYA is an open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study, in which pts with uHCC and no prior systemic therapy were initially randomized to STRIDE (T 300 mg plus D 1500 mg [one dose] plus D 1500 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W]), D (1500 mg Q4W), S (400 mg twice daily), or T 75 mg Q4W (4 doses) plus D 1500 mg Q4W (T75+D). Recruitment to T75+D ceased after a planned analysis of Study 22 showed T75+D did not meaningfully differ from D. The primary objective was overall survival (OS) for STRIDE vs S. The secondary objective was OS noninferiority (NI) of D to S (NI margin: 1.08). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v.1.1), duration of response (DoR), and safety. Results: In total, 1171 pts were randomized to STRIDE (N=393), D (N=389), or S (N=389). At data cutoff (DCO), the primary objective was met: OS was significantly improved for STRIDE vs S (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 96% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–0.92; p=0.0035; Table). D met the objective of OS NI to S (HR, 0.86; 96% CI, 0.73–1.03). ORRs were higher for STRIDE (20.1%) and D (17.0%) than for S (5.1%). No new safety signals were identified. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 25.8% (STRIDE), 12.9% (D), and 36.9% (S) of pts. Grade 3/4 hepatic TRAEs occurred in 5.9% (STRIDE), 5.2% (D), and 4.5% (S) of pts. No TRAE of esophageal varices hemorrhage occurred. Rates of TRAEs leading to discontinuation were 8.2% (STRIDE), 4.1% (D), and 11.0% (S). Conclusions: HIMALAYA was the first large phase 3 trial with a diverse, representative uHCC population and extensive long-term follow-up to assess both mono- and combination immunotherapy. D was noninferior to S with favorable safety. The combination of a single priming dose of T plus D in STRIDE displayed superior efficacy and a favorable benefit-risk profile vs S. STRIDE is a proposed, novel, first-line standard of care systemic therapy for uHCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03298451. [Table: see text]

TPS4173 Background: There is an unmet medical need in patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and biliary tract cancer (BTC), that progresses after standard therapy. The combination of pembrolizumab (pembro; anti–PD-1 antibody) and lenvatinib (len; anti-angiogenic multikinase inhibitor) demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in many tumor types. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2 alpha (HIF-2α) acts on multiple pathways including cell survival and proliferation, angiogenesis, genomic instability and treatment resistance. Monotherapy with the HIF-2α inhibitor belzutifan (MK-6482) impairs hypoxic signaling in cancer cells and has antitumor activity in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease associated non-RCC tumors such as pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Based on the potential role of hypoxia signaling and HIF-2α in tumorigenesis and tumor progression, the combination of belzutifan with pembro and len may improve antitumor activity further in the selected tumor types. Methods: This phase 2, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study (NCT04976634) is evaluating pembro 400 mg IV Q6W + oral len 20 mg QD (8 or 12 mg QD for body weight < 60 or ≥60 kg, respectively, for pts with HCC) + oral belzutifan 120 mg QD. Eligible pts: ≥18 y old with histologically confirmed unresectable HCC (Child-Pugh A; 1L); previously treated unresectable, metastatic non–MSI-H/mismatch repair deficient CRC (3L+); metastatic PDAC (2L/3L); or locally advanced/metastatic BTC (includes intra/extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gall bladder cancer; 2L+) with progressive disease (PD); measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 (verified by blinded independent central review [BICR]); ECOG PS ≤1 and archival/new tumor sample for biomarker analysis. All pts should be naïve to prior immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, len or any HIF-2α inhibitor. The safety lead-in phase is based on the modified toxicity probability interval design with a target dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of 30% and DLT-evaluable period of 21 days (3 wk/1 cycle) in ≤10 HCC pts and ≤15 pts with CRC, PDAC and BTC pooled for each dose level. The study will enroll 120 pts (30/tumor type) to receive triplet therapy for up to 2 y (for pembro) or until PD or discontinuation criteria are met. Enrollment may be expanded by an additional 70 pts/tumor type at the chosen dose level after safety and efficacy review with ≥6 mo follow-up. Primary endpoints are safety (DLTs [safety lead-in], AEs, and treatment discontinuation due to AEs) and ORR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. Secondary endpoints include DOR, disease control rate and PFS per RECIST v1.1 (and mRECIST for HCC) by BICR, and OS. Efficacy analyses will report binomial proportion or Kaplan-Meier estimates with 95% CIs. Safety analyses will be descriptive. Enrollment began August 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04976634.

436 Background: The phase 2 Study 22 trial (NCT02519348) investigated durvalumab (anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 [PD-L1] antibody) and tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4 antibody) as monotherapy, or durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab or bevacizumab (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] antibody), for the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Results of Study 22 that evaluated durvalumab and tremelimumab as monotherapy or in combination were reported previously. PD-L1 inhibition plus VEGF inhibition with bevacizumab may exhibit an additive effect to improve clinical activity. Herein, we report results from a single-arm cohort of Study 22, evaluating durvalumab plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with uHCC. Methods: Patients with uHCC who had not received any prior systemic therapy were administered durvalumab 1120 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. Adequate endoscopic therapy according to institutional standards was required for patients with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding for >12 months or those at high risk for esophageal varices. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included confirmed objective response rate (ORR; assessed by blinded independent central review [BICR] according to RECIST v1.1), duration of response (DoR; RECIST v1.1 by BICR) and overall survival (OS). Results: At the data cut-off (November 6, 2020), 47 patients were allocated to receive treatment. Median total treatment duration was 6.2 months (durvalumab) and 4.1 months (bevacizumab). Thirty-three (70.2%) patients experienced an adverse event possibly related to treatment (TRAE). Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs occurred in 4 (8.5%) patients; serious TRAEs occurred in 5 (10.6%) patients, including gastric ulcer perforation, ascites, and liver tumor rupture, possibly related to bevacizumab, and raised creatinine and pneumonitis, possibly related to durvalumab. There were 3 (6.4%) discontinuations and no deaths associated with TRAEs. Objective responses (RECIST 1.1 by BICR) were confirmed in 10 patients (ORR, 21.3%; 95% CI, 10.7–35.7); median DoR (RECIST 1.1 by BICR) was not reached. Median OS was not reached (95% CI, 12.52 months–non-estimable). Conclusions: Durvalumab plus bevacizumab was well tolerated and showed promising clinical activity in patients with uHCC. Durvalumab with or without bevacizumab in combination with transarterial chemoembolization is being investigated as locoregional therapy in patients with HCC not amenable to curative treatment in the phase 3 EMERALD-1 study (NCT03778957), and durvalumab with or without bevacizumab is being investigated in patients with HCC at high risk of recurrence after curative treatment in the phase 3 EMERALD-2 study (NCT03847428). Clinical trial information: NCT02519348.

476 Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a heterogeneous family of cancers including intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICC, ECC) and gallbladder carcinomas (GBC). Treatment options remain limited and prognosis is poor for advanced BTC, underscoring the need for early detection and new therapeutic targets. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies have identified mutations associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in up to 25% of BTC patients, but the proportion with germline (GMut) versus somatic (SMut) mutations has not been established. This retrospective study was designed to determine the prevalence of GMut and HRD-associated SMut in a large BTC convenience sample and their association with key clinical parameters. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed de-identified records from 804 BTC patients who received tumor/normal (T/N) matched NGS between 2017-2021 via the Tempus|xT assay (DNA-seq of 648 genes at 500x coverage; full transcriptome RNA-seq). This targeted panel detects single nucleotide variants (SNVs), indels, copy number variants (CNVs), and a selection of rearrangements. Analyses focused on pathogenic/likely pathogenic SMut and CNVs, as well as incidental GMut limited to SNVs and small indels in 50 hereditary cancer genes. HRD-associated GMut and SMut were analyzed across 9 and 18 HRR pathway genes, respectively. Results: We identified a cohort of 804 patients with BTC, composed of ICC (n=499), ECC (n=83), and GBC (n=222). The median age was 66 years; 55% were female; and race was White/Black/Asian in 78%/12%/6%. The prevalence of GMut was 4.6% overall. Subgroup analyses showed GMut in 5% of ICC, 4.8% of ECC, and 3.6% of GBC. For patients

Purpose FGFR genetic aberrations (GAs) occur in an estimated 10% to 16% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs). The natural history of CCA with FGFR GAs, the prognostic role of coexisting GAs, and the outcome with FGFR-targeted inhibitors are unknown. Patients and Methods Patients with CCA with FGFR GAs were identified using next-generation sequencing or fluorescence in situ hybridization from four tertiary cancer centers and compared with FGFR wild-type counterparts. Data reviewed included demographic, treatment, overall survival (OS), and GA data. Fisher’s exact test, Kaplan-Meier plots, and log-rank tests were used for statistical analysis. Results Three hundred seventy-seven patients with CCA were identified, and 95 had FGFR GAs. FGFR2 GA was most common (n = 74, with 63 fusions) and seen in intrahepatic CCA. In patients with CCA, FGFR GAs occurred more frequently in younger patients (≤ 40 years; 20%) compared with older patients (> 40 years; 6.7%; P < .001), presented at an earlier stage (TNM stage I/II v III/IV: 35.8% v 22%, respectively; P = .001), and were associated with a longer OS compared with patients without FGFR GAs (37 v 20 months, respectively; P < .001). This difference remained significant after excluding 36 patients treated with FGFR inhibitors. There was no OS difference ( P = .60) between CCA with FGFR2 fusions (n = 63) versus other FGFR GAs (n = 29). Patients with FGFR GAs had a better OS with FGFR-targeted therapy compared with standard treatment ( P = .01). BAP1 mutation was the most common coexisting mutation without prognostic impact, whereas TP53 ( P = .04) and CDKN2A/B ( P = .04) were correlated with a shorter OS. Conclusion CCA with FGFR GAs represents a unique subtype occurring in younger patients with an indolent disease course. FGFR-targeted therapy may have a positive impact on OS in this subgroup.

We present data from patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) receiving pembrolizumab in the KEYNOTE-158 (NCT02628067; phase 2) and KEYNOTE-028 (NCT02054806; phase 1b) studies. Eligible patients aged ≥18 years from both studies had histologically/cytologically confirmed incurable BTC that progressed after standard treatment regimen(s), measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1, and no prior immunotherapy. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors were required for eligibility in KEYNOTE-028 only. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every three weeks (KEYNOTE-158) or 10 mg/kg every two weeks (KEYNOTE-028) for ≤2 years. Primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Response assessed by independent central review is reported. KEYNOTE-158 enrolled 104 patients and KEYNOTE-028 enrolled 24 patients. Median (range) follow-up was 7.5 months (0.6-34.3) in KEYNOTE-158 and 5.7 months (0.6-55.4) in KEYNOTE-028. In KEYNOTE-158, ORR was 5.8% (6/104; 95% CI, 2.1%-12.1%); median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (NR) (range, 6.2-26.6+ months). Median (95% CI) OS and PFS were 7.4 (5.5-9.6) and 2.0 (1.9-2.1) months. Among PD-L1-expressers (n = 61) and PD-L1-nonexpressers (n = 34), respectively, ORR was 6.6% (4/61) and 2.9% (1/34). In KEYNOTE-028, ORR was 13.0% (3/23; 95% CI, 2.8%-33.6%); median DOR was NR (range, 21.5-53.2+ months). Median (95% CI) OS and PFS were 5.7 (3.1-9.8) and 1.8 (1.4-3.1) months. Grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13.5% of patients in KEYNOTE-158 (no grade 4; grade 5 renal failure, n = 1) and 16.7% in KEYNOTE-028 (no grade 4/5). In summary, pembrolizumab provides durable antitumor activity in 6% to 13% of patients with advanced BTC, regardless of PD-L1 expression, and has manageable toxicity.

PurposeWe aimed to described 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and to re-evaluate levels after chemotherapy.MethodsPermanent residents of the San Francisco Bay Area with a new CRC diagnosis of any stage were recruited prior to any non-surgical therapy. Serum 25(OH)D levels were measured at time of diagnosis and 6-month follow-up. Supplement use was not restricted. The primary endpoint was the frequency of vitamin D deficiency in patients with newly diagnosed CRC of all stages. The Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman correlation tests were used to evaluate associations of patient characteristics with 25(OH)D levels.ResultsMedian 25(OH)D level at baseline was 27.0ng/mL (range 7.2, 59.0); 65% of patients had insufficient levels (25(OH)D

Summary Background Immune checkpoint blockade therapy has shown promising results in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in this patient population. Methods KEYNOTE-224 is a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial that is set in 47 medical centres and hospitals across ten countries. Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma; had previously been treated with sorafenib and were either intolerant to this treatment or showed radiographic progression of their disease after treatment; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1; adequate organ function, and were Child-Pugh class A. Participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously every 3 weeks for about 2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal, or investigator decision. The primary endpoint was objective response, defined as the proportion of patients with complete or partial response in all patients who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab, which was radiologically confirmed by use of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by central review. Safety was also assessed in all treated patients. This trial is ongoing but closed to enrolment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02702414. Findings Between June 7, 2016, and Feb 9, 2017, we screened 169 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, of whom 104 eligible patients were enrolled and treated. As of data cutoff on Feb 13, 2018, 17 (16%) patients were still receiving pembrolizumab. We recorded an objective response in 18 (17%; 95% CI 11–26) of 104 patients. The best overall responses were one (1%) complete and 17 (16%) partial responses; meanwhile, 46 (44%) patients had stable disease, 34 (33%) had progressive disease, and six (6%) patients who did not have a post-baseline assessment on the cutoff date were considered not to be assessable. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 76 (73%) of 104 patients, which were serious in 16 (15%) patients. Grade 3 treatment-related events were reported in 25 (24%) of the 104 patients; the most common were increased aspartate aminotransferase concentration in seven (7%) patients, increased alanine aminotransferase concentration in four (4%) patients, and fatigue in four (4%) patients. One (1%) grade 4 treatment-related event of hyperbilirubinaemia occurred. One death associated with ulcerative oesophagitis was attributed to treatment. Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in three (3%) patients, but there were no reported cases of viral flares. Interpretation Pembrolizumab was effective and tolerable in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who had previously been treated with sorafenib. These results indicate that pembrolizumab might be a treatment option for these patients. This drug is undergoing further assessment in two phase 3, randomised trials as a second-line treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Funding Merck & Co, Inc.

BackgroundAdvanced biliary cancers (ABC) have a poor prognosis and low rates of response to immune checkpoint inhibition (CPI), with overall response rates ranging from 3–13%.1–3 Although suppressive myeloid cells have been proposed as a mechanism of resistance to immunotherapy in general, their relationship to response to CPI is unknown.MethodsWe used multiplexed simultaneous single cell RNA sequencing and cell surface proteomics (CITE-seq) to profile circulating immune cells in ABC patients receiving anti-PD-1 at longitudinal timepoints pre-immunotherapy and on treatment, as well as from healthy donors. We also performed single cell RNA sequencing on resected biliary tumors.ResultsWe identified a novel population of circulating cancer-enriched myeloid cells (CEM) characterized by chemokines and extracellular matrix digestion-related gene expression, which were present pre-treatment. Anti-PD-1 treatment drove the CEMs into two diverging states that were associated with response or resistance to treatment. CEM induced in non-responders constituted over 40% of the circulating myeloid cells and expressed immunosuppressive programs, including the upregulation of suppressive cytokines and chemokines. The frequency of these myeloid cells were correlated with the abundance of SOCS3-expressing CD4+ T cells. These SOCS3+CD4+ T cells also colocalized with tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells that share CEM gene expression signatures in the biliary cancer microenvironment. Moreover, CEM can directly induce SOCS3-expressing T cells, which despite their naïve phenotype are functionally unresponsive. Finally, expression signatures of CEM and of SOCS3+CD4+ T cells are associated with worse survival in a larger cohort of ABC patients.ConclusionsThese results demonstrate the capacity of CEM to induce T cell paralysis as an alternate mode of tumor-mediated immunosuppression. A deeper understanding of immune cell biology in ABC provides insights for developing novel therapeutics that can overcome immunotherapy resistance in biliary cancer as well as other tumor types.Trial RegistrationNCT02703714ReferencesUeno M, et al. Nivolumab alone or in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine in Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer: a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 1 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;4:611–621.Piha-Paul SA, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced biliary cancer: results from the KEYNOTE-158 and KEYNOTE-028 studies. Int J Cancer 2020.Kim RD, et al. A Phase 2 Multi-institutional study of nivolumab for patients with advanced refractory biliary tract cancer. JAMA Oncol 2020;6:888–894.Ethics ApprovalInformed consent was obtained from all patients for participation in the listed trial and for use of blood and tumor samples in research studies.

Background FGFR2 fusions occur in ~15% of patients (pts) with iCCA, a rare cancer with a poor prognosis. Futibatinib, a highly selective, irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor, has shown activity across tumor types, including iCCA, in a phase 1 study. The pivotal phase 2 FOENIX-CCA2 trial (NCT02052778) is evaluating futibatinib in iCCA harboring FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. Here, we report the first efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) data for the complete FOENIX-CCA2 population. Methods Eligible pts had unresectable/metastatic iCCA with an FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement and progressive disease (PD) after ≥1 prior treatment (tx; excluding FGFR inhibitors). Pts received futibatinib 20 mg QD until PD/intolerability. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by independent central review (target ORR: 20%). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Subgroup analyses were performed by pt characteristic and molecular alteration. Results Among 103 pts (56% female), 53% had received ≥2 prior tx. FGFR2 fusions were present in 78% (23% had FGFR2-BICC1 fusions) and FGFR2 rearrangements in 22%. At data cutoff (Oct 1, 2020), 72 pts (70%) had discontinued tx. The study met its primary objective with a confirmed ORR of 41.7% (43/103). Responses were durable, with a median (m) DOR of 9.7 mo and 72% of responses ≥6 mo. DCR was 82.5%. mPFS was 9.0 mo; mOS was 21.7 mo, with a 12-mo OS rate of 72%. ORR was consistent across pt demographic subgroups (≥65 y: 65.2%; 2 prior tx: 38.7%). Common tx-related AEs (TRAEs) were hyperphosphatemia (85%), alopecia (33%), and dry mouth (30%). The most frequent grade 3 TRAE, hyperphosphatemia (30%), resolved with adequate management (median 7 d). Retinal disorders (all grade 1-2) were reported in 8% of pts. TRAEs were managed with dosing interruptions (50%)/reductions (54%); 2 pts discontinued tx due to TRAEs. No tx-related deaths occurred. ORRs were consistent in pts with dosing interruptions (40.2%) or reductions (46.8%). PROs were stable through 11.0 mo of tx. In exploratory biomarker analyses, ORR was consistent in pts with FGFR2 fusions (43.8%) and other FGFR2 rearrangements (34.8%) and in pts with BICC1 (41.7%) and non-BICC1 (44.6%) fusion partners. Notably, no obvious differences in ORR were observed in pts with co-occurring genetic alterations, including TP53 comutations (ORR, 38.5% [5/13]). Additional biomarker data will be presented. Conclusions Futibatinib resulted in frequent, durable objective responses in pts with iCCA harboring FGFR2 fusion/rearrangements, regardless of pt baseline characteristic, molecular alteration, or comutation. AEs were manageable with dosing modifications that did not impact response. QoL was maintained. Citation Format: Lipika Goyal, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Antoine Hollebecque, Chigusa Morizane, Juan W. Valle, Thomas B. Karasic, Thomas A. Abrams, Robin Kate Kelley, Philippe Cassier, Junji Furuse, Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Heung-Moon Chang, Li-Tzong Chen, Yoshito Komatsu, Kunihiro Masuda, Daniel Ahn, Yaohua He, Nital Soni, Karim A. Benhadji, John A. Bridgewater. Primary results of phase 2 FOENIX-CCA2: The irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor futibatinib in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT010.

Background Biliary tract malignancies, in particular cholangiocarcinomas (CCA), are rare tumors that carry a poor prognosis. BRCA2 mutation carriers have an increased risk of developing CCA with a reported relative risk of ∼5 according to the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. In addition to this risk, there are potential therapeutic implications in those harboring somatic and/or germline (GL) BRCA mutations. Therefore, it is important to define the clinical characteristics of GL/somatic BRCA1/2 variants in CCA patients. Materials and methods We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of CCA patients diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2013 with GL or somatic variants in BRCA1/2 genes detected by GL mutations testing and/or by tumor next generation sequencing. Cases were identified from clinical databases at participating institutions. Data including demographics, clinical history, surgical procedures, and systemic chemotherapy or radiation were extracted from patients' records. Results Overall, 18 cases were identified: 5 carriers of GL BRCA1/2 mutations (4 BRCA2; 1 BRCA1) and 13 harboring somatic variations (7 BRCA1; 6 BRCA2). Mean age at diagnosis was 60, SD ± 10 years (range 36-75 years), with male and female prevalence rates of 61.2% and 38.8%, respectively. Stage at diagnosis was I (n = 4), II (n = 3), III (n = 3), and IV (n = 8). Six patients had extrahepatic CCA and the rest intrahepatic CCA. Thirteen patients received platinum-based therapy and four were treated with poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, of whom one experienced sustained disease response with a progression-free survival of 42.6 months. Median overall survival from diagnosis for patients with stage I/II in this study was 40.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.73-108.15) and with stages III/IV was 25 months (95% CI, 15.23-40.57). Conclusion BRCA-associated CCA is uncommon. This multicenter retrospective study provides a thorough clinical analysis of a BRCA-associated CCA cohort, which can serve as a benchmark for future development and design of expanded analyses and clinical trials. Implications for practice BRCA-associated CCA is uncommon but a very important subtype of hepatic malignancies, due to its rising prevalence. Better clinical characterization of this subtype might allow application of targeted therapy for CCA patients with germline or somatic mutations in BRCA1/2 genes, especially due to previously reported success of such therapies in other BRCA-associated malignancies. Thus this study, first of its kind, provides a basis for future multi-centered analyses in larger cohorts, as well as clinical trials. Additionally, this study emphasizes the importance of both germline and somatic genotyping for all CCA patients.

Purpose: The phase III CELESTIAL study demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with previously treated, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We analyzed outcomes by baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and on-treatment AFP changes. Patients and Methods: Serum AFP was measured every 8 weeks by blinded, centralized testing. Outcomes were analyzed by baseline AFP bifurcated at 400 ng/mL and by on-treatment AFP response (≥20% decrease from baseline at Week 8). The optimal cutoff for change in AFP at Week 8 was evaluated using maximally selected rank statistics. Results: Median OS for cabozantinib versus placebo was 13.9 versus 10.3 months [HR, 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62–1.04] for patients with baseline AFP Conclusions: Cabozantinib improved outcomes versus placebo across a range of baseline AFP levels. On-treatment AFP response and control rates were higher with cabozantinib than placebo, and were associated with longer OS and PFS with cabozantinib.

Purpose: Molecular profiling has been used to select patients for targeted therapy and determine prognosis. Noninvasive strategies are critical to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) given the challenge of obtaining liver tissue biopsies. Experimental Design: We analyzed blood samples from 206 patients with HCC using comprehensive genomic testing (Guardant Health) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Results: A total of 153/206 (74.3%) were men; median age, 62 years (range, 18–91 years). A total of 181/206 patients had ≥1 alteration. The total number of alterations was 680 (nonunique); median number of alterations/patient was three (range, 1–13); median mutant allele frequency (% cfDNA), 0.49% (range, 0.06%–55.03%). TP53 was the common altered gene [>120 alterations (non-unique)] followed by EGFR, MET, ARID1A, MYC, NF1, BRAF, and ERBB2 [20–38 alterations (nonunique)/gene]. Of the patients with alterations, 56.9% (103/181) had ≥1 actionable alterations, most commonly in MYC, EGFR, ERBB2, BRAF, CCNE1, MET, PIK3CA, ARID1A, CDK6, and KRAS. In these genes, amplifications occurred more frequently than mutations. Hepatitis B (HBV)-positive patients were more likely to have ERBB2 alterations, 35.7% (5/14) versus 8.8% HBV-negative (P = 0.04). Conclusions: This study represents the first large-scale analysis of blood-derived ctDNA in HCC in United States. The genomic distinction based on HCC risk factors and the high percentage of potentially actionable genomic alterations suggests potential clinical utility for this technology.

BACKGROUND: The recognition of distinct molecular subgroups within cholangiocarcinoma (CC), along with the increasing availability of targeted therapies, suggests that further characterization of the prevalence and prognosis of frequently occurring subgroups may assist with the development of more effective treatment approaches for the management of CC. A systematic review was performed to investigate the prevalence of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations (mIDH1) in patients with CC, the possible clinical and prognostic significance of mIDH1, and the presence of co-mutations in tumors with mIDH1. METHODS: This review was conducted using the Cochrane dual-reviewer methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Searches were performed in Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Trials Register and Database of Systematic Reviews, and other Cochrane Library assets using terms for CC and mIDH1 with no language or date restrictions for articles published up to December 31, 2017. Searches were also performed of abstracts presented at the following conferences in 2016 and 2017: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), ASCO-Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium (ASCO-GI), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), and ESMO-Asia. Screening was performed separately by two reviewers and cross-checked. Any discrepancies between reviewers were resolved by a senior researcher. Data from all selected references were recorded in a data extraction grid. RESULTS: A total of 46 publications met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Of these publications, 45 reported the frequency of mIDH1 among a total sample of 5,393 patients with CC. mIDH1 was enriched in intrahepatic CC (ICC), with 552 (13.1%; 95% CI, 12.1–14.2) of the 4,214 patients with ICC having the mutation compared with 9 (0.8%; 95% CI, 0.4–1.5%) of the 1,123 patients with extrahepatic CC (ECC). The percentage of females with mIDH1 CC (66.2%; 95% CI, 57.7–73.7%) was higher than in the overall CC population (44.4%). The frequency of mIDH1 in patients with ICC reported in individual studies ranged from 4.5–55.6%, and a significantly higher frequency was reported in non-Asian centers compared with Asian centers (weighted mean, 16.5% vs. 8.8%; P

Lessons LearnedTKM-080301 showed a favorable toxicity profile at the studied dose. TKM-080301 targeting PLK1 through small interfering RNA mechanism did not demonstrate improved overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma compared with historical control. Preliminary antitumor activity as shown in this early-phase study does not support further evaluation as a single agent.BackgroundPolo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Knockdown of PLK1 expression by PLK1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) in an HCC cell line showed reduced expression in RNA-induced silencing complex and a reduction in cell proliferation.MethodsA 3 + 3 dose escalation plus expansion cohort at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was implemented. Patients with HCC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2, and Child-Pugh score A received TKM-080301 as an intravenous infusion once every week for 3 consecutive weeks, repeated every 28 days.ResultsThe study enrolled 43 patients. The starting dose of TKM-080301 was 0.3 mg/kg, and MTD was declared at 0.75 mg/kg. Following the development of grade 4 thrombocytopenia in two subjects on the expansion cohort, the MTD was redefined at 0.6 mg/kg. Four patients did not have any evaluable postbaseline scan. Of the other 39 subjects who had received at least 0.3 mg/kg, 18 subjects (46.2%) had stable disease (SD) by independent RECIST 1.1 criteria. By Choi criteria, eight subjects (23.1%) had a partial response (PR). For 37 assessable subjects, with 2 subjects censored, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.04 months. Median survival for the whole study population was 7.5 months.ConclusionTKM-080301 was generally well tolerated. In this early-phase study, antitumor effect for TKM 080301 was limited. Further evaluation as a single agent in large randomized trials is not warranted.