Search

The combination of bendamustine and rituximab (BR) is highly effective in both treatment-naïve and relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Due to the rarity of MCL and limited accessibility of BR, clinical outcome from BR in the routine clinical practice in Korean patients are limited.To evaluate the real-world outcomes of BR treatment for MCL in Korea, medical records from 37 patients were retrospectively analyzed.Twenty-five patients received BR as first-line treatment, and ten, eight, and seven patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk by MIPI-classification, respectively. With the follow-up duration of 24.3 months, the three-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 80.5%±11.8%. PFS significantly differed according to MIPI-classification (p=0.002) and TP53 status (p=0.042). The three-year overall survival (OS) rate was 92.0%±5.4%. In 12 patients who received BR as salvage treatment, the median age was 66. The median PFS was 12.8 months, and the three-year OS rate was 66.8%±16.2%.BR is an effective regimen for both newly-diagnosed and relapsed or refractory MCL patients in Korea, with favorable response rates and outcomes.

PurposeFebrile neutropenia (FN) can cause suboptimal treatment and treatment-related mortality (TRM) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP). Materials and methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP, and we compared them with the PROCESS cohort (n=485). ResultsSince January 2015, 986 patients with DLBCL were enrolled. Pegfilgrastim was administered at least once in 930 patients (94.3%), covering 90.3% of all cycles. FN developed in 137 patients (13.9%) in this cohort (23.7% in the PROCESS cohort, p

Background The efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) as a second-line chemotherapy treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC), remains unclear. This multi-center randomised phase III trial aimed to elucidate the efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy treatment for mPAC patients with good performance status. Patients and methods Eighty mPAC patients (age, 19–75 years) refractory to first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were randomly selected to receive mFOLFIRINOX or S-1. mFOLFIRINOX comprised oxaliplatin (65 mg/m2), irinotecan (135 mg/m2), and leucovorin (400 mg/m2) on day 1 and continuous 5-FU infusion (1000 mg/m2) over 24 h on days 1–2 every 2 weeks. S-1 comprised body surface area-dependent oral S-1, divided into two doses per day on days 1–28 every 6 weeks. Results Overall survival was the primary endpoint. The objective response and disease control rates were higher in the mFOLFIRINOX than in the S-1 group (15% versus 2%; p = .04 and 67% versus 37%; p = .007). The median progression-free survival rates were 5.2 and 2.2 months in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-1 groups, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: .4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .2-.6; p Conclusion Administration of mFOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy treatment for mPAC patients refractory to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy resulted in increased survival rates than S-1 treatment alone.

Background: With the development of immunology, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been widely used in various cancer treatments. Although some patients can benefit from ICIs, other patients have no response to ICIs or suffer from hyperprogression. There has been no biomarker for predicting the efficacy of ICIs. Thus, the objective of this study was to find biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of ICIs using peripheral blood. Methods: Adults patients planned to be treated with ICIs were enrolled in this study. Blood sampling was carried out before and after administration of ICIs. Changes of immune cell fraction were analyzed for each patient. Results: Among 182 patients enrolled, immune cell analysis was performed for 90 patients. The objective response rate was 14.4% (n = 13/90). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.1–8.9 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 13.9 months (95% CI: 5.6–22.2 months). Significant benefits in ORR and OS were shown for patients with increased NKp46-/CD56+ NK cells (p = 0.033 and p = 0.013, respectively). The PFS tended to be longer in these patients, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.050). Conclusion: Changes of immune cell fraction before and after administration of ICIs could be a novel biomarker for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy.

The standard of treatment for completely resected limited-stage diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients without residual lesions has not yet been established. Previously, we designed a phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP in patients with completely resected limited-stage DLBCL and reported favorable survival outcomes. We present the long-term follow-up results to taking into account the importance of delayed relapse in patients with limited-stage DLBCL. With a median follow-up duration of 62.7 months (range, 60.2–75.5 months), the 5-year OS and DFS rates were both 95.0% (95% confidence interval, 85.59–104.11%). Only one patient experienced disease progression which was confirmed at 12.3 months, and one patient with primary intestinal DLBCL developed non-small cell lung cancer 6 years after treatment. The long-term results of our data support the use of three cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP for patients with completely resected limited-stage DLBCL. The study was reviewed and approved by the review boards of the participating institutes and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01279902, in August 3, 2010.

Purpose High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard management for relapsed or high-risk non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). We reported the busulfan, melphalan, and etoposide (BuME) conditioning regimen was effective in patients with relapsed or high-risk NHL. Moreover, the busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCE) conditioning regimen has been used widely in ASCT for NHL. Therefore, based on these encouraging results, this randomized phase II multicenter trial compared the outcomes of BuME and BuCE as conditioning therapies for ASCT in patients with NHL.Materials and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive either BuME (n=36) or BuCE (n=39). The BuME regimen was comprised of busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day, intravenously) administered on days –7, –6, and –5, etoposide (400 mg/m2 intravenously) on days –5 and –4, and melphalan (50 mg/m2/day intravenously) on days –3 and –2. The BuCE regimen was comprised of busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day intravenously) on days –7, –6, and –5, etoposide (400 mg/m2/day intravenously) on days –5 and –4, and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg/day intravenously) on days –3 and –2. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS).Results Seventy-five patients were enrolled. Eleven patients (30.5%) in the BuME group and 13 patients (33.3%) in the BuCE group had disease progression or died. The 2-year PFS rate was 65.4% in the BuME group and 60.6% in the BuCE group (p=0.746). There were no non-relapse mortalities within 100 days after transplantation.Conclusion There were no significant differences in PFS between the two groups. Therefore, busulfan-based conditioning regimens, BuME and BuCE, may be important treatment substitutes for the BCNU-containing regimens.

304 Background: The characteristics and prognosis of de novo metastatic gastric cancer and recurrent metastatic gastric cancer have not yet been elucidated. Here, we compare prognosis and characteristics of patients with de novo versus recurrent gastric cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included 301 advanced pathologically confirmed gastric cancer patients who received palliative chemotherapy between 2012 and 2022. The de novo cohort was included of patients who presented with distant metastasis at diagnosis and recurrent metastatic cohort was composed of patients with metastasis after curative gastrectomy. We analyzed prognostic association by Cox regression and compared survival time of both cohorts using the Kaplan-meire method. Results: A total of 167 de novo and 112 recurrent patients were included. There were no differences noted among the patients with de novo disease and recurrent metastatic disease with respect to age, sex, ECOG, primary cancer location and pathologic features. Patients in the recurrent group versus de novo group were longer duration of chemotherapy (1.16 ± 1.18 years versus 0.85 ± 0.84, P = 0.01) and lower mean body mass index. (20.22 ± 2.78 versus 21.93 ± 3.38, p < 0.001) The median overall survival in the de novo group was 11.6 versus s 14.4 months in the recurrent group. ( P = 0.02) In a multivariate analysis, the age of 70 years or older at the time of stage 4 diagnosis was independently associated with shorter survival. Conclusions: De novo and recurrent metastatic gastric cancer characterize distinguished subpopulations. And advanced gastric cancer with distant recurrence has significantly better survival versus those with de novo cohort. This differences between de novo and recurrent gastric cancer could facilitate discussions about patient selection of clinical trial and help with advanced personalized treatment. [Table: see text]

Background Systemic inflammatory response can be associated with the prognosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We investigated the systemic factors significantly related to clinical outcome in relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Methods In 242 patients with DLBCL, several factors, including inflammatory markers were analyzed. We assessed for the correlation between the survivals [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] and prognostic factors. Results In these patients, a high derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) (PFS, HR=2.452, P=0.002; OS, HR=2.542, P=0.005), high Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) (PFS, HR=2.435, P=0.002; OS, HR=2.621, P=0.002), and high NCCN-IPI (PFS, HR=2.836, P=0.003; OS, HR=2.928, P=0.003) were significantly associated with survival in multivariate analysis. Moreover, we proposed a risk stratification model based on dNLR, GPS, and NCCN-IPI, thereby distributing patients into 4 risk groups. There were significant differences in survival among the 4 risk groups (PFS, P

Approximately 50% of limited-stage ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (OAML) patients with adverse prognostic factors relapse after radiotherapy. Chemoimmunotherapy has been proposed as an alternative frontline therapy. However, only a few studies have reported its long-term treatment outcome.In 2011, we commenced a phase 2 trial to investigate the efficacy of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisolone (R-CVP) in bilateral and non-conjunctival limited-stage OAML patients. Results of the clinical trial showed a response rate of 100% and a 4-year progression-free survival of 90.3% without significant toxicity. We extended the study period to December 2020 to determine the long-term efficacy of R-CVP chemoimmunotherapy.At a median observation period of 66.0 months, eight of 33 study patients had relapsed. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 18.9% at 5 years and 44.7% at 8 years. The majority of relapses developed more than 4 years after treatment. Local relapse was more prevalent than distant relapse. The relapse risk of orbital and lacrimal diseases was likely to be higher than that of conjunctival and eyelid diseases (HR: 2.5, 95% CI: 0.498-12.500, p = 0.25).Although the response rate was remarkable for chemoimmunotherapy, the risk of late relapse was considerable. Based on our findings, clinical trials for limited-stage OAML patients should have a long-term observation period. To minimize radiation toxicity and reduce the risk of delayed relapse (local relapse and distant relapse), a future study with sequential or combination treatment of local low-dose radiation and systemic chemoimmunotherapy can be considered.

The additive or synergistic sustained antitumour effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has previously been reported. We investigated the efficacy of nivolumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy versus placebo plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with HER2-negative, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer.We did a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2-3 trial (ATTRACTION-4) at 130 centres (hospitals, cancer centres, and medical centres) across Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. We enrolled patients aged 20 years and older with previously untreated (except for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy completed ≥180 days before recurrence), HER2-negative, unresectable, advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 expression), at least one measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours guidelines (version 1.1), and a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to chemotherapy every 3 weeks (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/mBetween March 23, 2017, and May 10, 2018, 724 patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 362 patients to the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 362 to the placebo plus chemotherapy group. At the time of data cutoff on Oct 31, 2018, with a median follow-up of 11·6 months (IQR 8·7-14·1), median progression-free survival at a prespecified interim analysis was 10·45 months (95% CI 8·44-14·75) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 8·34 months (6·97-9·40) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·68; 98·51% CI 0·51-0·90; p=0·0007). At the time of data cutoff on Jan 31, 2020, with a median follow-up of 26·6 months (IQR 24·1-29·0), median overall survival at the final analysis was 17·45 months (95% CI 15·67-20·83) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 17·15 months (15·18-19·65) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (HR 0·90; 95% CI 0·75-1·08; p=0·26). The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were neutrophil count decreased (71 [20%] of 359 patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group vs 57 [16%] of 358 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group) and platelet count decreased (34 [9%] vs 33 [9%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events of any grade were observed in 88 (25%) patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and in 51 (14%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group, of which the most common was decreased appetite (18 [5%] vs ten [3%]). Six treatment-related deaths occurred: three in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group (one each of febrile neutropenia, hepatic failure, and sudden death) and three in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (one each of sepsis, haemolytic anaemia, and interstitial lung disease).Nivolumab combined with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival, but not overall survival, in Asian patients with untreated, HER2-negative, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer, and could potentially be a new first-line treatment option for these patients.Ono Pharmaceutical and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), such as erythropoietin (EPO) and darbepoetin, may alleviate anemia in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. However, many cancer cells express EPO receptors (EPOR), through which exogenously administered ESAs potentially promote cancer cell growth. We conducted preclinical/phase II studies to investigate the safety and efficacy of ESAs for managing chemotherapy-related anemia in DLBCL patients. We examined EPOR expression in germinal center B-cell (GCB)- and activated B-cell (ABC)-DLBCL cell lines, and investigated the effects of ESAs on cell proliferation, and rituximab-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). The clinical study enrolled 50 histologically confirmed DLBCL patients receiving rituximab/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisolone (R-CHOP) who had hemoglobin levels

Purpose Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a type of body cavity-based lymphoma (BCBL). Most patients with PEL are severely immunocompromised and seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We investigated the distinctive clinicopathologic characteristics of BCBL in a country with low HIV burden. Materials and methods We retrospectively collected data on the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of 17 consecutive patients with BCBL at nine institutions in Korea. Results Latency-associated nuclear antigen 1 (LANA1) immunostaining indicated that six patients had PEL, six patients had human herpesvirus 8 (HHV8)-unrelated BCBL, and five patients had HHV8-unknown BCBL. The patients with PEL exhibited no evidence of immunodeficiency except for one who was HIV positive. One (20%) and four (80%) patients with PEL and six (100%) and zero (0%) patients with HHV8-unrelated BCBL were positive for CD20 and CD30 expression, respectively. The two patients with PEL (one HIV-positive and one HIV-negative patient) with the lowest proliferation activity as assessed by the Ki-67 labeling index survived for > 1 and > 4 years without chemotherapy, respectively, in contrast to the PEL cases in the literature, which mostly showed a high proliferation index and poor survival. Conclusion PEL mostly occurred in ostensibly immunocompetent individuals and had a favorable outcome in Korea. A watchful waiting approach may be applicable for managing HIV-seronegative patients with PEL with a low Ki-67 labeling index. A possible trend was detected among LANA1, CD20, and CD30 expression in BCBL.

The VIKTORY (targeted agent eValuation In gastric cancer basket KORea) trial was designed to classify patients with metastatic gastric cancer based on clinical sequencing and focused on eight different biomarker groups (RAS aberration, TP53 mutation, PIK3CA mutation/amplification, MET amplification, MET overexpression, all negative, TSC2 deficient, or RICTOR amplification) to assign patients to one of the 10 associated clinical trials in second-line (2L) treatment. Capivasertib (AKT inhibitor), savolitinib (MET inhibitor), selumetinib (MEK inhibitor), adavosertib (WEE1 inhibitor), and vistusertib (TORC inhibitor) were tested with or without chemotherapy. Seven hundred seventy-two patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and sequencing was successfully achieved in 715 patients (92.6%). When molecular screening was linked to seamless immediate access to parallel matched trials, 14.7% of patients received biomarker-assigned drug treatment. The biomarker-assigned treatment cohort had encouraging response rates and survival when compared with conventional 2L chemotherapy. Circulating tumor (ctDNA) analysis demonstrated good correlation between high MET copy number by ctDNA and response to savolitinib. Significance: Prospective clinical sequencing revealed that baseline heterogeneity between tumor samples from different patients affected response to biomarker-selected therapies. VIKTORY is the first and largest platform study in gastric cancer and supports both the feasibility of tumor profiling and its clinical utility. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1325

Background: Although biliary tract cancer (BTC) has a very aggressive nature, some patients maintain a relatively good performance status after failure with first-line treatment of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC). Thus, tolerable, feasible, and useful second-line treatments are needed for these patients. We investigated the efficacy of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as a second-line therapy for patients with advanced BTC who failed first-line GC treatment. Methods: In this prospective, phase II trial, we investigated XELOX (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1) as a second-line treatment, given every 3 weeks, totaling 8 cycles in patients with metastatic BTC who failed first-line GC treatment. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: From December 2015 to November 2016, 50 patients with metastatic intrahepatic or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gall bladder (GB) cancer were enrolled. The regimen was well tolerated. Toxicities mainly consisted of grade 1 or 2 events, and thrombocytopenia and neuropathy had the highest incidence. In intent-to-treat analysis, one complete response (CR) and six partial responses (PRs) were recorded with XELOX treatment. The overall response rate and the disease control rate from the intent-to-treat analysis were 14% and 52%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 15.6 months, PFS after XELOX was a median of 15.4 weeks (95% CI, 8.5-22.3). This PFS value supported the statistical hypothesis of this study. The median overall survival was 32.7 weeks (95% CI, 21.4-43.9). Conclusion: This phase II trial showed that XELOX treatment was efficacious and had a tolerable toxicity profile in patients with advanced BTC who failed first-line treatment of gemcitabine and cisplatin.

Background: The ecto-ATPase CD39 is the rate-limiting enzyme in the adenosine pathway that plays an important immune regulatory role. Preclinically, inhibition of CD39 by TTX-030, a first-in-class fully human anti-CD39 antibody, reversed immunosuppression by maintaining high levels of immune-stimulatory extracellular ATP while reducing suppressive adenosine. The addition of nivolumab to chemotherapy has recently become the standard of care of 1st-line (1L) treatment of locally advanced or metastatic (LA/M) gastric cancer but further improvements are needed. Methods: An expansion cohort of Study TTX-030-002 (ongoing, US and South Korea) is evaluating the safety and efficacy of the combination of TTX-030, budigalimab (anti-PD-1) and FOLFOX for the 1L treatment of patients (pts) with LA/M HER2− gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included ORR by RECIST/iRECIST, and PFS. Correlative studies included the analysis of intratumoral expression of CD39 and PD-L1. Results: Forty-four pts were enrolled with the median age [range] of 61 [30−81] years, 41% were female, and 57% were Asian. Pts had an ECOG of 0 (39%) or 1 (61%), 70% had gastric adenocarcinoma, 30% had GEJ adenocarcinoma. As of the safety data cutoff (Nov 19, 2021), 39 pts (89%) experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent AE (any Grade, regardless of relatedness). Twenty-one pts (48%) experienced at least 1 AE considered related to TTX-030 (any Grade); five (11%) experienced a Grade 3/4 AE considered related to TTX-030. There were no Grade 5 TEAEs. Eleven pts (25%) had experienced SAEs; none were considered related to TTX-030. The most common AEs by preferred term (any Grade, regardless of relatedness) in ≥10 pts were nausea (52%), neutrophil count decreased (39%), decreased appetite (30%), diarrhea (25%), and fatigue (23%). The most common Grade ≥3 AEs (regardless of relatedness) in ≥2 pts were neutrophil count decreased (27%), febrile neutropenia (5%), hypokalemia (5%). As of the efficacy data cutoff (Dec 2, 2021), the median time [range] on study was 139 [8−375] days. Among 38 efficacy evaluable pts, 23 pts experienced PR or better as best response (PR: n=21; CR: n=2; ORR=61%), 12 experienced SD, and 3 had PD. Thirty-six of the 38 efficacy-evaluable patients had known PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS); response rates were 4/10 (CPS Conclusions: Preliminary results indicate that the combination of TTX-030, budigalimab and FOLFOX exhibited promising efficacy as 1L treatment of LA/M gastric/GEJ cancer regardless of CPS status and has a manageable safety profile without evidence of excessive toxicities. To our knowledge, this represents the first report of an anti-CD39 antibody in combination with chemo-immunotherapy in gastric cancer. Updated clinical and biomarker data will be included in the final presentation. Citation Format: Zev Wainberg, Yoon-Koo Kang, Keun-Wook Lee, Seung Tae Kim, Joseph Chao, Daniel Catenacci, Sung Yong Oh, Heloisa P. Soares, J. Eva Selfridge, Yongjun Cha, Roland T. Skeel, Hyung-Don Kim, Anh Tran, Achim Moesta, Tracy Dela Cruz, Anil Singhal, Thomas M. Jahn, Farshid Dayyani. Safety and efficacy of TTX-030, an anti-CD39 antibody, in combination with chemoimmunotherapy for the first line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastric/GEJ cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT015.

Background Gastric cancer (GC) is a heterogenous disease consisted of several subtypes with distinct molecular traits. The clinical implication of molecular classification has been limited especially in association with treatment efficacy of ramucirumab or various targeted agents. Methods We conducted a prospective non-randomized phase II single-arm trial of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in 62 patients with metastatic GC who failed to respond to first-line fluoropyrimidine plus platinum treatment. For integrative molecular characterization, all patients underwent pre-ramucirumab treatment tissue biopsy for whole-exome/whole-transcriptome sequencing to categorize patients based on molecular subtypes. We also systematically performed integrative analysis, combining genomic, transcriptomic, and clinical features, to identify potential molecular predictors of sensitivity and resistance to ramucirumab treatment. Results Sixty-two patients were enrolled in this study between May 2016 and October 2017. Survival follow-up in all patients was completed as of the date of cut-off on January 2, 2019. No patient attained complete response (CR), while 22 patients achieved confirmed partial response (PR), resulting in a response rate (RR) of 35.5% (95% CI, 23.6–47.4). According to TCGA molecular classification, there were 30 GS, 18 CIN, 3 EBV, and 0 MSI tumors. The RR was 33% in GS (10/30), 33% in CIN (6/18), and 100% in EBV-positive GC patients with significant statistical difference for EBV(+) against EBV(−) tumors (P = 0.016; chi-squared test). Moreover, responsive patients were marked by activation of angiogenesis, VEGF, and TCR-associated pathways, while non-responder patients demonstrated enrichments of sonic hedgehog signaling pathway and metabolism activity. Integrative multi-layer data analysis further identified molecular determinants, including EBV status, and somatic mutation in GNAQ to ramucirumab activity. Conclusions Prospective molecular characterization identified a subset of GC patients with distinct clinical response to ramucirumab therapy, and our results demonstrate the feasibility of personalized therapeutic opportunities in gastric cancer. Trial registration The study was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT02628951) on June 12, 2015.

Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are uncommon and their incidence is regionally heterogeneous. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the clinical features and treatment outcomes of this disease entity, but the majority of these were conducted in limited areas, making it difficult to comprehensively analyze their relative incidence and clinical features. Furthermore, no consensus treatment for PTCLs has been established. Therefore, we conducted an Asia-specific study to understand the relative incidence of PTCLs and assess treatments and their outcomes in Asian patients. Methods: We performed a multinational, multicenter, prospective registry of adult patients with PTCLs that was named as the International Cooperative non-Hodgkin T-cell lymphoma prospective registry study where thirty-two institutes from six Asian countries and territories (Korea, China, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia) participated. Findings: A total of 486 patients were registered between April 2016 and February 2019, and more than a half of patients (57.4%) had stage III or IV. Extranodal natural killer (NK)/T- cell lymphoma was the most common subtype (n=139, 28.6%), followed by angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n=120, 24.7%), PTCL-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS, n=101, 20.8%), ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL, n=34, 6.9%), and ALK-negative ALCL (n=30, 6.2%) in decreasing order of frequency. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21.1 months (95% CI,10.6–31.6) and 83.6 months (95% CI, 56.7–110.5), respectively. Upfront use of combined treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy showed better PFS than chemotherapy alone in localized ENKTL whereas consolidation with upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) provided longer PFS in advance stage ENKTL. In patients with PTCLs other than ENKTL, anthracycline-containing chemotherapies were widely used, but the outcome of those regimens was not satisfactory, and upfront autologous SCT was not significantly associated with survival benefit, either. The treatment outcome of salvage chemotherapy was disappointing, and none of the salvage strategies showed superiority to any other. Interpretation: This multinational, multicenter study identified the relative incidence of each subtype of PTCLs across Asian countries, and the survival outcomes according to the therapeutic strategies currently in use. Funding Statement: This study was supported by a grant from the Samsung Biomedical Research Institute (GFO1150161). Declaration of Interests: We declare no competing interests. Ethics Approval Statement: This registry was approved by the Institutional Review Boards or Scientific Review Committees as required by the policies of individual institutions. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before study enrollment.

Background: After the publication of the ABC-02 trial, gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy (GP) became the standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Despite GP therapy, most patients suffer from disease progression. The ABC-06 trial recommended FOLFOX as a second-line treatment, but its efficacy was modest. In this phase II study, we looked at the efficacy and safety of a second-line modified dose of FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) for patients who had failed first-line gemcitabine-based treatment. Methods: From January 2020 to January 2021, 34 patients with advanced BTC who failed first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were enrolled. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety outcomes of mFOLFIRINOX. Results: With a median follow-up duration of 13.4 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6–4.0 months) and 6.2 months (95% CI: 5.0–7.4 months), respectively. The objective response rate was 14.7% with no complete response. The disease control rate was 61.7%, with a disease control duration of 4.2 months. Due to the rapid progression of the disease, approximately half of all patients received less than three cycles of treatment. The most common type of adverse event (AEs) was hematopoietic AEs. The incidence of non-hematopoietic AEs was relatively low. Conclusions: The efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX as a second-line treatment in advanced BTC patients after the failure of gemcitabine-based first-line treatment was replicated, albeit with slightly shorter survival results compared to previous studies. Long-term administration of mFOLFIRINOX with toxicity management might offer a survival benefit.

The mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) International Prognostic Index (IPI) was recently proposed as a prognostic index for patients with MALT lymphoma. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the serum β2-microglobulin level in the context of MALT-IPI, and we proposed a new prognostic index. Survival outcomes were analysed with regard to β2-microglobulin level, MALT-IPI, and the new prognostic index in MALT lymphoma patients (n = 571). The validity of the new prognostic index was assessed using an independent cohort (n = 216). Patients with high β2-microglobulin levels had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. A high β2-microglobulin level was independently associated with poor PFS and OS. β2-microglobulin levels further stratified patients in the MALT-IPI intermediate-risk group in terms of PFS and OS. A new prognostic index based on the MALT-IPI and the β2-microglobulin level, MALT-IPI-B, was proposed. The MALT-IPI-B was able to stratify patients into subgroups having distinct PFS and OS outcomes in both the training and validation cohorts. MALT-IPI-B enabled the identification of patients with poor survival outcomes who were classified into the intermediate-risk group by the MALT-IPI. In conclusion, this new β2-microglobulin-based prognostic index may have the specific advantage of identifying high-risk patients who may require systemic treatment.

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma is a type of low-grade B-cell lymphoma that can be classified as a mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Recently, second-generation or next-generation sequencing (NGS), which allows simultaneous sequencing of hundreds to billions of DNA strands, has been a focus of attention and is rapidly being adopted in various fields. In the present study, paraffin-embedded tissue samples of gastric MALT lymphoma (n=1) and small intestine MALT lymphoma (n=4) were selected, and DNA was extracted from the tissue samples. After performing quality control, NGS was performed using HemaSCAN™, a custom panel of 426 genes, including essential blood cancer genes. NGS revealed single nucleotide variations (SNVs), short insertions and deletions (InDels) and copy number variations (CNVs). These genomic variants were reported as annotated, known or novel variants. An annotated variant, an erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene amplification, was observed in one patient. Known and novel variants, including SNVs of SET binding protein 6 (SETBP6), Runt-related transcription factor 1 and Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 genes, InDel of the marker of proliferation Ki-67 gene, and CNVs of the zinc finger protein 703 and NOTCH1 genes, were observed in ≥2 patients. Additionally, InDels with frameshift mutations were identified in the B-cell lymphoma/leukemia 10, DEAD-box helicase 3 X-linked, forkhead box O3 and mucin 2, oligomeric mucus/gel-forming genes in one patient. Since few NGS studies have been performed on MALT lymphoma, the current results were unable to determine if the different mutations that were identified are 'actionable' (that is, potentially responsive to a targeted therapy) Further studies are required to determine the associations between genetic mutations and the development of MALT lymphoma.

Purpose Although chemotherapy is recommended by various guidelines for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), the evidence supporting its use over best supportive care (BSC) is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival benefit of chemotherapy over that of BSC in advanced BTC patients. Materials and Methods Advanced BTC patientswith a good performance status (Eastern CooperativeOncologyGroup [ECOG] 0-2) were eligible for the study. Data were retrospectively collected from four tertiary cancer centers and analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM). Of the 604 patients enrolled, 206 received BSC and 398 received chemotherapy. PSM analysis was performed using the following variables: age, ECOG status, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, white blood cell level, albumin level, total bilirubin level, and aspartate aminotransferase level. The sample size of each group was 164 patients after PSM. Median survival was compared between the two groups by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were investigated using Cox proportional regression analysis. Results In post-PSM analysis, the respective median survival for the chemotherapy and BSC groups was dependent on the following prognostic factors: total population, 12.0 months vs. 7.5 months (p=0.001); locally advanced disease, 16.7 months vs. 13.4 months (p=0.490); cancer antigen 19-9 ≤ 100 IU/mL, 12.7 months vs. 10.6 months (p=0.330); and CEA ≤ 3.4 ng/mL, 17.1 months vs. 10.6 months (p=0.052). Conclusion Chemotherapy improved overall survival of patients with advanced BTC who had a good performance status. However, this survival benefit was not observed in BTC patients with locally advanced disease or with lower tumor marker. Individualized approach is needed for initiation of palliative chemotherapy in advanced BTC.

Background: In stage I/II natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) had previously been shown to result in superior outcome compared with anthracycline-containing regimens, which have since been considered ineffective. The role of CCRT in comparison with approaches employing nonanthracycline-containing chemotherapy (CT) and sequential radiotherapy (RT) in such patients remains to be defined. Patients and methods: Three hundred and three untreated patients (207 men, 96 women; median age: 51, 18-86 years) with stage I/II NK/T-cell lymphoma who had received nonanthracycline-containing regimens were collected from an international consortium and retrospectively analyzed. Treatment included single modality (CT and RT), sequential modalities (CT+RT; RT+CT) and concurrent modalities (CCRT; CCRT+CT). The impact of clinicopathologic parameters and types of treatment on complete response (CR) rate, progression-free-survival (PFS) and overall-survival (OS) was evaluated. Results: For CR, stage (P=0.027), prognostic index for NK/T-cell lymphoma (PINK) (P=0.026) and types of initial treatment (P=0.011) were significant prognostic factors on multivariate analysis. On Cox regression analysis, ECOG performance score (P=0.021) and PINK-EBV DNA (PINK-E) (P=0.002) significantly impacted on PFS; whereas ECOG performance score (P=0.008) and stage (P

After introducing a rituximab-containing chemoimmunotherapy (R-CHOP) for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a partial response (PR) which is regarded as treatment failure is still observed. To investigate the prognostic factors for the DLBCL patients with a PR to R-CHOP, we retrospectively evaluated 758 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients. After R-CHOP, 88 (11.6%) achieved a PR. Three-year progression-free and overall survival rates measured from the date of PR achievement (PFS2 and OS2) were 57.4 and 67.8%, respectively. The secondary International Prognostic Index (IPI2) scores after R-CHOP were low (0-1) in 68.2% and high (2-3) in 31.8% of the patients. The Deauville scores from 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after R-CHOP showed low (2-3) in 58.0% and high (4) in 42.0% of the patients. High IPI2 and high Deauville scores were associated with worse PFS2 (P 0.001 and P = 0.009) and OS2 (P = 0.013 and P = 0.067). The high-risk group defined by the IPI2 and Deauville scores, whose scores were both high, showed significantly lower 3-year PFS2 (P 0.001) and OS2 (P = 0.006) rates compared with those of the other groups. In multivariate analyses, the IPI score of ≥ 3 at diagnosis and bone marrow involvement at diagnosis were independent prognostic factors. In addition, high IPI2-Deauville score after R-CHOP was significantly associated with poor PFS2 (P = 0.009) and demonstrated a trend toward inferior OS2. In conclusion, DLBCL patients who partially responded to R-CHOP are still a heterogeneous group, for which IPI2 and Deauville scores should be evaluated for prediction of prognosis.

// Sung-Yong Kim 1 , Suk-Woo Yang 2 , Won-Sik Lee 3 , Jae Wook Yang 4 , Sung Yong Oh 5 , Hee Bae Ahn 6 , Deok-Hwan Yang 7 , Seong Kyu Park 8 , Jee Ho Chang 9 , Hyo Jung Kim 10 , Min Joung Lee 11 and Seok-Goo Cho 12 1 Department of Hematology-Oncology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 2 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 3 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea 4 Department of Ophthalmology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, Korea 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea 6 Department of Ophthalmology, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea 7 Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeollanamdo, Korea 8 Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon, Korea 9 Department of Ophthalmology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon, Korea 10 Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea 11 Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea 12 Department of Hematology, Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea Correspondence to: Seok-Goo Cho, email: chosg@catholic.ac.kr Keywords: lymphoma, ocular, mucosa associated lymphoid tissue, rituximab, chemoimmunotherapy Received: March 09, 2017 Accepted: June 24, 2017 Published: August 02, 2017 ABSTRACT Background: Radiotherapy is a commonly used treatment for limited-stage ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (OAML) but showed a substantial relapse risk if the disease involves beyond-conjunctiva or bilateral conjunctivae. Systemic chemoimmunotherapy may be an alternative frontline therapy for the limited disease with those adverse prognostic factors. Patients and methods: We designed a multicenter, phase II study of the chemoimmunotherapy, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CVP) for the treatment of patients with limited-stage OAML with bilateral or beyond-conjunctival involvement. Thirty-three patients with Ann Arbor stage I OAML with the adverse factors were enrolled. Patients received six cycles of R-CVP followed by two cycles of rituximab therapy. Results: At the end of treatment, all the enrolled patients had responded. The cumulative complete response achievement was 93.9% at 2 years. At a median follow-up of 50.6 months, three patients had progressed. Progression-free survival and overall survival at 4 years was 90.3±5.3% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: This phase II study demonstrated durable efficacy of R-CVP chemoimmunotherapy, which has promise as an alternative frontline therapy for the limited-stage OAML patients with adverse prognostic factors. Clinical trial registration: NCT01427114.

BACKGROUND To assess whether the rotation of dexamethasone to methylprednisolone decreases the intensity of dexamethasone-induced hiccup (DIH) in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adult patients who experienced DIH within 3 days after the administration of dexamethasone as an antiemetic were screened. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive dexamethasone (n = 33) or methylprednisolone (n = 32) as an antiemetic (randomization phase). In the next cycle of chemotherapy, the dexamethasone group received methylprednisolone and vice versa in the methylprednisolone group (crossover phase). The primary endpoint was the difference in hiccup intensity as measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS) between two groups. RESULTS No female patients were enrolled, although the study did not exclude them. At the randomization phase, hiccup frequency was 28/33 (84.8%) in the dexamethasone group versus 20/32 (62.5%) in the methylprednisolone group (p = .04). Intensity of hiccup was significantly higher in the dexamethasone group than that in the methylprednisolone group (mean NRS, 3.5 vs. 1.4, p

The management of advanced prostate cancer has evolved rapidly. Androgen deprivation therapy, via surgical or medical castration, is the first-line therapy for hormone-naive metastatic prostate cancer. For approximately a decade, docetaxel-based chemotherapy was the only approved agent to show a survival benefit for castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, over the last 5 years, significant advances in the field have led to the approval of several new agents with different mechanisms of action, such as the new androgen pathway inhibitors abiraterone and enzalutamide, a new cytotoxic agent, cabazitaxel, and new bone-seeking agents such as radium-223, which have all been associated with improved quality of life and pain palliation and an increase in survival. However, there has been no Korean treatment guideline for metastatic prostate cancer which is developed based on thorough search for relevant articles, including recently developed agents, and adequate review and assessment of evidences, and thus, a guideline adequate for domestic circumstance is eagerly needed. Experts from the Genitourinary Oncology Committee of the Korea Cancer Study Group developed clinical recommendations for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer based on 19 key questions. The Korean Association for Clinical Oncology, the Korean Prostate Society, the Korean Urological Oncology Society, and the Korean Society of Pathologists reviewed and endorsed the guidelines. These are the first Korean treatment guidelines developed specifically for metastatic prostate cancer. (Korean J Med 2017;92:124-141)

// Dok Hyun Yoon 1, * , Byeong Seok Sohn 2, * , Sung Yong Oh 3 , Won-Sik Lee 4 , Sang Min Lee 4 , Deok-Hwan Yang 5 , Jooryung Huh 6 , Cheolwon Suh 1 1 Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea 4 Department of Hemato-Oncology, Internal Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea 5 Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea 6 Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Cheolwon Suh, email: csuh@amc.seoul.kr Dok Hyun Yoon, email: dhyoon@amc.seoul.kr Keywords: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, limited stage, complete resection, abbreviated cycles and R-CHOP chemotherapy Received: November 04, 2016 Accepted: December 28, 2016 Published: January 05, 2017 ABSTRACT Background: The appropriate number of chemotherapy cycles for limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients without gross residual lesions after complete resection, has not been specifically questioned. We performed a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study to investigate the feasibility of 3 cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP chemotherapy in low-risk patients with completely resected localized CD20+ DLBCL. Results: Between December 2010 and May 2013, we recruited 23 patients. One was excluded due to ineligibility, and hence, 22 were included in the final analysis. The primary sites comprised the intestine ( n = 15), cervical lymph nodes ( n = 4), stomach ( n = 1), tonsil ( n = 1), and spleen ( n = 1). All patients successfully completed the 3 cycles of planned R-CHOP chemotherapy. Over a median follow-up of 39.5 months (95% confidence interval, 29.9—47.1 months), both the estimated 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates was 95% confidence interval, 85.9–104.1%. Only one patient with an international prognostic index of 2 experienced relapse and died. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity condition included neutropenia ( n = 8, 36.4%). Three patients experienced grade 3 febrile neutropenia, but no grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity was observed. Materials and Methods: DLBCL patients without residual lesions after resection were enrolled and R-CHOP chemotherapy was repeated at 3-week-intervals over 3 cycles. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival. Conclusions: Three cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP immunochemotherapy is feasible for completely resected low risk localized DLBCL.

Background The upregulated expression of the JAK/STAT pathway promotes tumor growth in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). Based on the hypothesis that JAK2 is a therapeutic target, we performed a prospective pilot study using ruxolitinib. Methods Relapsed or refractory patients with HL or PMBCL were eligible for this study, and JAK2 amplification was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Ruxolitinib was administered orally at a dose of 20 mg twice daily for a 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued for up to 16 cycles or until progressive disease or intolerability. The primary objective was to assess the overall disease control rate comprising complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). Results We analyzed 13 HL patients and six PMBCL patients. All responders (one CR, five PR, and one SD) had HL whereas all cases of PMBCL progressed after first or second cycle. The disease control rate for HL was 54% (7/13) with median response duration of 5.6 months. JAK2 amplification was present in six of nine patients tested (four HL, two PMBCL), and three of these HL patients showed PR (n = 2) or SD (n = 1). None of the three HL patients shown to not have JAK2 amplification responded to ruxolitinib. Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1 or 2 and manageable. Conclusions Ruxolitinib has single-agent activity against HL but does not act against PMBCL with or without JAK2 amplification. Trial registration The study population was patients who had relapsed or refractory HL or PMBCL, and patients were registered for our pilot study after providing written informed consent between November 2013 and November 2015 (CilinicalTrials.gov: NCT01965119).

Background: Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) was effective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy in the global NAPOLI-1 trial. Real-world data may further clarify the outcomes and safety profile of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in clinical practice. Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients with mPAC who received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV following gemcitabine-based therapy under a Managed Access Program in Korea. Results: From January 2017 to April 2018, 86 patients across 10 institutions received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV (median age, 61 years; 60% male; ECOG performance status, 0–1). A total of 35 (41%) and 51 (59%) patients had received less than two and two or more lines of chemotherapy before inclusion, respectively. At a median follow up of 6.4 months, median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.4–11.4) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.3–5.7). Six-month OS and PFS rates were 65.1% and 37.5%, respectively. Objective response and disease control rates were 10% and 55%, respectively. Most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (37.2%), nausea (10.5%), vomiting (9.3%), anorexia (8.1%) and diarrhoea (4.7%). Conclusion: Real-life data for Korean patients indicate that, consistent with NAPOLI-1, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV is effective and well-tolerated in patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy.

Background The response rate and survival improvement for rituximab, a CD20-targeting monoclonal antibody, have been demonstrated in marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapeutic regimens, yet relapses still occur despite treatment completion. Thus, extending the period of remission in MZL patients remains an essential goal. This multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II study evaluated the survival efficacy of 2 years of rituximab-maintenance therapy in patients with stage III–IV CD20-positive MZL who had responded to first-line R–CVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone). The objective of this study was to determine whether rituximab maintenance following R–CVP warrants further investigation. Methods Prior to rituximab-maintenance therapy, patients received 6–8 cycles of first-line R–CVP therapy for stage III–IV MZL. Rituximab (375 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2), and vincristine (1.4 mg/m2; maximum 2 mg) were administered via an intravenous infusion on day 1 of each 3-week cycle, while oral prednisolone (100 mg) was given on days 1–5 of each 3-week cycle. The patients who achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) to R–CVP treatment, were prescribed rituximab-maintenance therapy which was administered intravenously at a dose of 375 mg/m2 every 8 weeks for up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and treatment safety. Results 47 patients were enrolled, of whom, 45 (96%) received rituximab-maintenance treatment. Fifteen (33%) patients had nodal MZL. Following R–CVP first-line therapy, 20 (44%), 22 (49%), and 3 (7%) patients achieved CR, PR, and SD, respectively. After a median follow-up of 38.2 months, their observed 3-year PFS rate was 81%. During the rituximab-maintenance, 6 PR and 1 SD patients achieved CR following the administration of R–CVP. Elevated LDH and the presence of B symptoms were found to be significant prognostic factors for PFS (P = 0.003) and demonstrated a 3-year OS rate of 90%. Rituximab-maintenance therapy was well tolerated, and the common treatment-emergent adverse events were sensory neuropathy (18%), myalgia (13%), fatigue (9%), and neutropenia (9%). Conclusion Rituximab-maintenance therapy following first-line R–CVP demonstrated good PFS in patients with stage III–IV MZL, in addition to a favorable toxicity profile. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01213095

Background The efficacy of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pancreatic cancer (PC), or colorectal cancer (CRC) has been demonstrated. However, dermatological reactions to these inhibitors can cause significant physical and psychosocial discomfort. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of EGF ointment for EGFR inhibitor‐related skin adverse events (ERSEs). Materials and Methods This placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, multicenter, pilot phase III trial enrolled patients with NSCLC, PC, or CRC treated with EGFR inhibitors. Patients with grade ≥2 ERSEs were included. Patients were randomized to three treatment arms: arm 1, placebo; arm 2, 1 ppm of EGF ointment; and arm 3, 20 ppm of EGF ointment. Patients applied ointment to their skin lesions twice daily. Results Efficacy evaluation was available for 80 patients (9 for PC, 28 for NSCLC, and 43 for CRC). Responses were 44.4% in arm 1, 61.5% in arm 2, and 77.8% in arm 3. There was a linear correlation between EGF concentrations and responses (p = .012). Quality of life (QoL) was assessed for 74 patients. Maximum changes in composite scores by Skindex‐16 after treatment were significantly different among arms (mean ± SD: −5.2 ± 8.6 for arm 1, −11.7 ± 14.2 for arm 2, and − 18.6 ± 17.7 for arm 3; p = .008). EGF arms showed significant improvement in emotions (p = .005) and functioning (p = .044) scores over the placebo arm. Conclusion EGF ointment is effective for managing ERSEs. It can also improve patients’ QoL compared with placebo. Clinical trial identification number. NCT02284139 Implications for Practice Patients with non‐small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, or colorectal cancer who are treated with epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) inhibitors may experience dermatologic reactions to their treatment. This study investigated the benefit of an EGF ointment in the treatment of these adverse events and observed the ointment to be effective in managing EGFR inhibitor‐related skin adverse events., Epidermal growth factor (EGFR) is an important target for antitumor therapy. This article evaluates the efficacy of EGF ointment for EGFR inhibitor‐related adverse events of the skin.

The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) serves a prognostic role in several lymphomas. The objectives of the present study were to determine whether GPS predicts clinical outcomes and to compare the utility of four prognostic scores, including GPS, in patients diagnosed with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). We selected for this retrospective study 96 patients consecutively diagnosed with PTCL according to the World Health Organization classification from January 2002 to February 2013 and followed up in five different institutions. Low GPS was a good prognostic biomarker of progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.030) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.013). Estimated 3-year OS rates (low-risk vs. intermediate- or high-risk) by the International Prognostic Index (IPI), the Prognostic Index for T-cell lymphoma (PIT), the International Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma Project (IPTCLP) score, and GPS were 83% vs. 44% (P

4119 Background: Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) consisting of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin has been assessed as second-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in retrospective and phase II studies. However, the result was not confirmed by randomized controlled trial. Methods: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial was conducted at 9 institutions in Korea. Patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 who failed to first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive mFOLFIRINOX or S-1. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: A total of 80 patients were enrolled from March 2017 to December 2019. The accrual of patients was early terminated due to clear difference of efficacy in the interim analysis and expectation of poor recruitment due to conflicting adjuvant regimens. Objective response and disease control rates were 15.4% vs. 2.4% ( p= 0.041) and 66.7% vs. 36.6% ( p= 0.007) in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-1 arms, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 5.2 and 2.2 months in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-1 arms, respectively ( p= 0.002). The median overall survival was 9.2 and 4.9 months in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-1 arms, respectively ( p= 0.048). The adjusted hazard ratio of the mFOLFIRINOX arm to the S-1 arm for overall survival was 0.402 (95% confidence interval 0.223-0.725, p= 0.002). All grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 56.5% and 17.1% in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-1 arms, respectively ( p< 0.001). However, only one patient in each arm prematurely discontinued treatment due to toxicity and there was no treatment-related mortality in both arms. Minimally important differences in the health-related quality of life were not observed in both arms. Conclusions: mFOLFIRINOX as second-line treatment in mPAC patients failed to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy demonstrated a survival benefit versus S-1 alone with acceptable toxicities. Clinical trial information: KCT0003534.

TPS185 Background: LIV-1 is a transmembrane protein expressed in a variety of cancer types. SGN-LIV1A, or ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV), is a novel investigational humanized IgG1 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) directed against LIV-1. LV mediates delivery of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), which drives antitumor activity through cytotoxic cell killing and induces immunogenic cell death. In a phase 1 study, LV was tolerable and active in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (Modi 2017). This study is currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of LV in different advanced solid tumors with various LIV-1 expression, including metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-small cell lung cancer (squamous and nonsquamous), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Methods: SGNLVA-005 (NCT04032704) is an open-label, phase 2 study evaluating LV monotherapy in patients with previously treated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic advanced solid tumors, including mCRPC. Patients with mCRPC will receive LV administered as a 30 minute intravenous infusion (IV) at 1.25 mg/kg every 1 week. Up to 30 patients with mCRPC will be enrolled. Patients in the mCRPC cohort must have metastatic castration-resistant disease, have received no more than 1 prior line of androgen receptor-targeted therapy, have ≥28 days between androgen receptor-targeted therapy and start of study treatment, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. In addition, mCRPC patients with measurable and non-measurable disease are eligible if the protocol-defined criteria are met. mCRPC patients must not have BRCA gene mutations, prior cytotoxic chemotherapy in the metastatic mCRPC setting, prior radioisotope therapy, or radiotherapy to ≥30% of bone marrow. Patients are not preselected based on tumor LIV-1 expression. Their tumor samples will be analyzed for correlation between LIV-1 expression and response. Safety and efficacy will be monitored throughout the study. Study objectives include objective tumor response rate per RECIST 1.1 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (both primary); safety and tolerability, disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free and overall survival, and pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity (all secondary); and pharmacodynamics. Study accrual is ongoing in the USA, Italy, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, and the UK. Clinical trial information: NCT04032704.

TPS256 Background: LIV-1 is a transmembrane protein expressed in a variety of cancer types. SGN-LIV1A, or ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV), is a novel investigational humanized IgG1 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) directed against LIV-1. LV mediates delivery of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), which drives antitumor activity through cytotoxic cell killing and induces immunogenic cell death. In a phase 1 study, LV was tolerable and active in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer at a recommended dose of 2.5 mg/kg every 21 days (Modi 2017). More frequent, fractionated dosing has improved the activity and/or safety of other ADCs. Thus, this study is currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of weekly LV dosing (Days 1, 8, and 15 of every 3-week cycle) in different advanced solid tumors with various LIV-1 expression, including advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-small cell lung cancer (squamous and nonsquamous), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, castration resistant prostate cancer, and melanoma. Methods: SGNLVA-005 (NCT04032704) is an open-label, phase 2 study evaluating LV monotherapy in patients with 8 different advanced solid tumors in two parts (administered as a 30 minute intravenous infusion [IV]: Part A LV 2.5 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks [up to n = 72 total]; Part B LV 1.0 or 1.25 mg/kg every 1 week [up to n = 252 total]). The study is enrolling previously treated patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease. Patients must have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Cohort specific inclusion criteria require that patients in the gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cohorts must have received and progressed during or after no more than 1 prior line of platinum based cytotoxic chemotherapy. Patients in the gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma cohort may have received prior anti-programmed cell death (ligand) 1 (anti-PD[L]1) therapy (unless contraindicated), and patients with known human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression must have received prior HER2-targeted therapy. Patients are not preselected based on tumor LIV-1 expression. Tumor samples will be analyzed for correlation between LIV-1 expression and tumor response. Safety and efficacy will be monitored throughout the study. Study objectives include objective response rate (primary); safety and tolerability, disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free and overall survival, and pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity (all secondary); and pharmacodynamics. Study accrual is ongoing in the USA, Italy, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, and the UK. Clinical trial information: NCT04032704.

Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess the role of adjuvant therapy in stage I-III gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients who have undergone R0 resection. Materials and Methods Clinical data were collected on 441 consecutive patients who underwent R0 resection for stage I-III GBC. Eligible patients were classified into adjuvant therapy and surveillance only groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) between the two groups was performed, adjusting clinical factors. Results In total, 84 and 279 patients treated with adjuvant therapy and followed up with surveillance only, respectively, were included in the analysis. Before PSM, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was lower in the adjuvant therapy group than in the surveillance only group (50.8% vs. 74.8%, p < 0.001), although there was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (66.2% vs. 79.5%, p=0.089). After the PSM, baseline characteristics became comparable and there were no differences in the 5-year RFS (50.8% vs. 64.8%, p=0.319) and OS (66.2% vs. 70.4%, p=0.703) rates between the two groups. Conclusion The results suggest that fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant therapy is not indicated in stage I-III GBC patients who have undergone R0 resection.

// Sung Yong Oh 1 , Aesun Shin 2 , Seong-Geun Kim 3 , Jung-Ah Hwang 4 , Seung Hyun Hong 4 , Yeon-Su Lee 4 , Hyuk-Chan Kwon 5 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University, Korea 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea 4 Cancer Genomics Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea 5 Sillajen Inc., Busan, Korea Correspondence to: Yeon-Su Lee, email: yslee2@ncc.re.kr Hyuk-Chan Kwon, email: hckwon@sillajen.com Keywords: insulin-like growth factor, polymorphism, gastric cancer Received: January 08, 2016 Accepted: April 11, 2016 Published: April 29, 2016 ABSTRACT The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis plays a crucial role in proliferation, differentiation, migration, angiogenesis, and apoptosis. The present study evaluated the associations between IGF axis single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and clinical outcomes in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients treated with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX). A total of 190 patients undergoing FOLFOX chemotherapy for AGC were considered eligible for this study. Forty-four SNPs of 10 IGF axis genes were genotyped. Levels of serum IGF1 were measured using enzyme-linked immunoassays. SNPs of the IGF1R (rs12423791), and IGF1 (rs2162679, rs5742612, rs35767) genes were significantly associated with tumor response to FOLFOX. SNPs of rs4619 and rs17847203 were significantly associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.575, 95% CI 0.385–0.858, P = 0.007; and HR 2.530, 95% CI 1.289–4.966, P = 0.007; respectively). SNPs of rs2872060 were significantly associated with OS—OS was shorter in patients carrying the TT variant than in those with the GG/GT genotypes (HR, 1.708, 95% CI 1.024–2.850, P = 0.040). The GT genotype of rs12847203 was also identified as an independent prognostic factor (HR 2.087, 95% CI 1.070–4.069, P = 0.031). These results suggest that IGF axis-pathway SNPs could be used as prognostic biomarkers of the outcome of FOLFOX chemotherapy in AGC patients. This information may facilitate identification of population subgroups that could benefit from IGF1R-targeted agents.

Background/aims CD11c is a dendritic cell marker in humans, which potentially induces a cytotoxic effect on lymphoma cells. Forkhead boxP3 (FOXP3) is a regulator of T lymphocyte in the microenvironment of the lymphoma. The principal objective of this study was to determine whether the tumors' microenvironment expressions of CD11c and FOXP3 are predictive of clinical outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients receiving treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, anthracycline, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) combination chemotherapy. Methods The study population consisted of 100 patients with DLBCL. The CD11c and FOXP3 expression in primary tumors' microenvironment were evaluated using an immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results CD11c and FOXP3 expression positivity in microenvironment were 25% and 35%, respectively. Each one counted for 1 point. In CD11c and FOXP3 stain, positive was counted as 0 and negative was 1. The points were separated into low risk (0 to 1) and high risk (2) groups. Only the extranodal DLBCL patient group analysis conveyed significant differences of progression-free survival (p = 0.019) and overall survival (p = 0.039) between the two groups. Conclusions We can achieve possible clinical significance of lymphoma tumor microenvironments through CD11c and FOXP3 IHC stains in extranodal DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP therapy.

Purpose The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor that regulates expression of mediators of lipid metabolism and the inflammatory response. Thyroid hormone receptor-associated proteins 220 (TRAP220) is an essential component of the TRAP/Mediator complex. The objective of this study was to clarify whether PPARγ or TRAP220 are significant prognostic markers in resectable colorectal cancer (CRC). Materials and Methods A total of 399 patients who underwent curative resection for CRC were enrolled. We investigated the presence of PPARγ and TARP220 in CRC tissues and adjacent normal tissues by immunohistochemistry. Correlation between the expression of these factors and clinicopathologic features and survival was investigated. Results Median age of the patients was 63 years (range, 22 to 87 years), and median follow-up duration 61.1 months (range, 2 to 114 months). PPARγ and TRAP220 expression showed significant correlation with depth of invasion (p=0.013 and p=0.001, respectively). Expression of TRAP220 also showed association with lymph node metastasis and TNM stage (p=0.001). Compared with patients with TRAP220 negative tumors, patients with TRAP220 positive tumors had longer 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) tendency (p=0.051). Patients who were PPARγ positive combined with TRAP220 positive had a better 5-year DFS (64.8% vs. 79.3%, p=0.013). In multivariate analysis expression of both PPARγ and TRAP220 significantly affected DFS (hazard ratio, 0.620; 95% confidence interval, 0.379 to 0.997; p=0.048). Conclusion TRAP220 may be a valuable marker for nodal metastasis and TNM stage. Tumor co-expression of PPARγ and TRAP220 represents a biomarker for good prognosis in CRC patients.

Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) of the breast is an uncommon tumor characterized by its dual differentiation into luminal cells and myoepithelial cells. In most cases these tumors have a benign clinical course, but distant metastases have been reported. We present the case of a 51-year-old woman diagnosed with malignant AME. The patient underwent a right modified radical mastectomy, and pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of malignant AME. Ten months after the operation, multiple hepatic, pleural, and abdominal wall metastases were detected. A number of palliative chemotherapeutic agents were tried, including anthracycline and taxanes. However, the disease continued to progress, and superior vena cava syndrome developed as a result of direct tumor invasion. The patient received salvage eribulin monotherapy. After two cycles of this treatment, her clinical symptoms were ameliorated, and a computed tomography scan showed a partial response. Eribulin chemotherapy was thus effective in treating malignant AME in this case.

The mechanisms of epidermal growth factor (EGF) affecting EGF receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)-related skin toxicities are as yet unknown. We investigated which mechanisms are involved in EGF&rsquo, s positive effects. Two types of EGFRIs, cetuximab and gefitinib, were used to treat the cells or 3d-cultured human skin tissue with recombinant human EGF (rhEGF). As a result, rhEGF increased EGFR and pEGFR expression. Furthermore, rhEGF induces EGFR signaling by pAKT and pPI3K expression in gefitinib and rhEGF co-treated cells. In addition, rhEGF bound to EGFR after than cetuximab, but cetuximab bound to EGFR more strongly than rhEGF. Moreover, expressions of proliferation and differentiation proteins, both ki-67 and filaggrin, were decreased in EGFRI-treated tissue. However, in rhEGF and EGFRI co-treated tissue, those expressions were increased. Expression of IL-1&alpha, IL-8, and TNF-&alpha, was increased by EGFRIs and down-regulated by rhEGF. Furthermore, hBD-2 and hBD-3 protein expressions were inhibited by cetuximab or gefitinib treatment, and those decrements were increased by rhEGF treatment. In patients&rsquo, tissue evaluation, compared with controls, patients&rsquo, Ki-67 and EGFR expression were decreased (p = 0.015, p = 0.001). Patients&rsquo, IL-17 and TNF-&alpha, expression intensity was higher than that of the control group (p = 0.038, p = 0.037). After treatment with EGF ointment, average values of Ki-67, EGFR, and Melan-A were changed to normal values. Oppositely, patients&rsquo, proportions of IL-17 and TNF-&alpha, were decreased to low stain level. In conclusion, treatment of rhEGF improved EGFRI-induced skin eruption via normalizing the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes, reducing inflammatory cytokines by the affected EGFRIs.

e19391 Background: Emerging oncology drugs such as targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have brought dramatic advances in cancer treatment, while rapid rise in the drug cost. In Korea, the policy of expansion of health insurance coverage has improved accessibility to high-priced oncology drugs through their registrations in reimbursement list. However, this made a considerable impact on the financial burden of national health insurance. The objective of this study was to assess the awareness and perceptions of medical oncologists about the value frameworks of cancer drugs in Korea. Methods: We collected the data from survey for 102 medical oncologists at cancer conference. They were asked about prioritization among multiple considerations when they prescribe cancer drugs, The second question was awareness of value frameworks such as American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) value framework and European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). Additionally, potential application of value framework to the decision on reimbursement coverage was included. Results: The majority of respondents (90%) chose clinical efficacy as the most important factor when they selected oncology drug for cancer patients. Safety/tolerability and drug cost were followed as 5.9% and 1%, respectively. Meanwhile, the order of priority of considerations for ICIs treatment was as follows: clinical efficacy (74.5%), drug costs (13.7%), and safety/tolerability (9%). More than half of those questioned (53.9%) were already aware of ASCO value framework and ESMO-MCBS, while 26.5% did not recognize them at all. Over 90% of respondents agreed with the need for development of new value framework tool which can be complementary to current valuation system for oncology drugs. Oncologists responded positively to the necessity of the assessment tool as a criterion for reimbursement registration (84.3%) as well as post-reimbursement re-evaluation (89.2%). Conclusions: Our results suggest that value assessment tool of oncology drug be necessary for providing medical evidences for clinical decision and for determination to health insurance reimbursement in Korea.

e16613 Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary cancer, but the prognosis is poor and aggressive therapies provide only limited benefit when it is in advanced stage. Many studies were conducted to find significant prognostic factors to predict clinical outcomes, but there is no definitive parameter or scoring model yet in this disease. This study is a retrospective analysis to test various kinds of prognostic scoring systems including the advanced lung cancer inflammation (ALI) index, a new prognostic model, for patients treated for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively searched medical records of patients who were diagnosed with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between January 2012 and December 2017 and actively treated at a single tertiary regional cancer center. Patients who received only supportive care, or had active infection concomitantly were excluded. 60 patients were identified, and we reviewed and analyzed their baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes. Various types of inflammation or nutritional scoring systems, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Onodera’s prognostic nutritional index (OPNI), the advanced lung cancer inflammation (ALI) index were concurrently calculated and significance for patients’ survival was evaluated. Results: In 50 patients with metastatic stage and 10 patients with locally advanced disease, the median overall survival was 13.97 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.99 – 19.95). ALI of 28.5 was determined as the optimal cut-off value for prediction of 1-year survival by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve with an AUC value of 0.671 (sensitivity and specificity were 77.8% and 60.6%, respectively). 26 patients with ALI > 28.5 had significantly better overall survival compared with 34 patients with ALI≤28.5 (19.2 months vs. 8.73 months, p= .007). NLR above 2.8 only showed mildly significant difference for overall survival (OS), and the OPNI failed to predict prognosis of these patients. In multivariate analysis, there was no independent prognostic factor observed to have association with overall survival. Conclusions: The advanced lung cancer inflammation (ALI) index showed a potential to be a new prognostic model for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Further cohort studies to expand population size may be worth.

An additional affiliation for the first author was not indicated. Hyewon Lee is also affiliated with: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

To investigate the safety and efficacy of 30-min maintenance infusions of trastuzumab in advanced gastric cancer positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). This was a retrospective study conducted across five Korean hospitals in patients with HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treated with first-line, 3-weekly trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. The first dose of trastuzumab (8 mg/kg) was administered as a 90-min infusion, with all subsequent maintenance infusions (6 mg/kg) given over 30 min. The primary aim was to investigate infusion-related reactions and cardiac events with 30-min infusions of trastuzumab. Objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary endpoints. The study included 128 patients (efficacy population), of whom 123 received both induction and maintenance infusions and formed the safety population. The median age was 63 years; 80% were presenting for the first time with metastatic disease, and 94% were treated with trastuzumab plus capecitabine/cisplatin. Infusion-related reactions were observed in 32 of 123 patients (26%). There were no cardiac events. The most frequent adverse events were anorexia and nausea, followed by vomiting, fatigue, mucositis, sensory neuropathy, and hand–foot syndrome. Most events were grade 1–2 and were manageable. No patient discontinued study treatment due to adverse events. The objective response rate was 63%, and included 6 complete responses. Trastuzumab 30-min maintenance infusions were well tolerated with a good safety profile, and resulted in sustained efficacy in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.