Search

Background: Comprehensive tumor analysis by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is imperative for targeted and immunotherapy related biomarkers’ analysis in metastatic breast cancer enabling personalization of cancer treatment in these patients. In parallel with targeted therapies, immunotherapies are also evolving, revolutionizing cancer therapy. Thus, biomarkers such as. Microsatellite Instability (MSI), and Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) are commonly employed in NGS analysis due to their correlation to Immune Checkpoint inhibitors treatment.Methods: In the present study, tumor molecular profile analysis was performed in 73 metastatic breast cancer patients using a broad NGS assay, which analyzes more than 500 unique cancer related genes and is able to detect relevant single nucleotide variations (SNVs), indels, copy number variations (CNVs) and gene fusions, in addition to TMB and MS) simultaneously. Results: An actionable alteration was detected in 79.45% of the patients. 35.62% of them had at least one alteration with an on label treatment associated and 10.96% received information related to an off-label treatment (Tiers 1A.1 and 2C.1 respectively). Additionally, 31.51% of the tumors harbored an alteration that could be used for clinical trial inclusion (Table 1). The most prevalent altered gene in these patients was the PIK3CA gene, with 27.40% mutation rate. Moreover, in 11 cases (15.07%) the mutation detected was in a gene involved in the Homologous recombination (HR) pathway, with evidence of response to PARP inhibitors. BRCA1/2 genes were as expected the most prominent HR mutated genes (5 out of 11 HR mutations), while the remaining HR mutations involved other HR genes (ATM, BLM, CHEK2, FANCM, RAD50). 24.66% of the tumors had a TMB value >10muts/MB and thus were eligible for ICI treatment. The addition of TMB to targeted biomarkers’ analysis increased the number of patients with an on-label treatment recommendation by 8.22%. Conclusions: Tumor molecular profile analysis using NGS, in real world samples, is a first-tier method for metastatic breast cancer and provides important information for decision making in the treatment of such patients. Importantly, simultaneous analysis for targeted therapy and immunotherapy biomarkers could lead to better tumor characterization and offered actionable information in 9 out of 10 patients tested. However, appropriate interpretation of results from such analysis is essential for implementation in clinical practice and accurate refinement of the treatment strategy.. Table 1.Biomarker's summary in the 73 patients included in the studyPercentage of patients with Tier1 variantsPercentage of patients with 2C.1 variantsPercentage of patients with 2C.2/2D variantsPercentage of patients with Tier 3 variantsPercentage of patients with TMB>10muts/MBMEDIAN TMBPercentage of MSI-High patients35.62% (26/73)10.96% (8/73)12.33% (9/73)0% (0/73)24.66% (18/73)5.050% (0/73) Citation Format: Eirini Papadopoulou, Nikolaos Tsoulos, Vasiliki Metaxa-Mariatou, Aikaterini Tsantikidi, Georgios Kapetsis, Chrysiida Florou-Chatzigiannidou, Sonia Maravelaki, Evgenia Bourkoula, Dimitrios Fotiou, Georgios Tsaousis, Nikolaos Touroutoglou, Dimitrios Trafalis, Ioannis Boukovinas, Ioannis Varthalitis, Zacharenia Saridaki, Charalampos Zoublios, Eleni Galani, George Papatsibas, Christos Papadimitriou, Tania Zlatintsi, Polixenia Iorga, Bülent Orhan, Sualp Tansan, Tahsin Özatlı, George Nasioulas. Comprehensive tumor analysis by NGS in metastatic breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-01.

Background Tumor molecular profile analysis by Next Generation Sequencing technology is currently widely applied in clinical practice and has enabled the detection of predictive biomarkers of response to targeted treatment. In parallel with targeted therapies, immunotherapies are also evolving, revolutionizing cancer therapy, with Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), Microsatellite instability (MSI), and Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) analysis being the biomarkers employed most commonly. Methods In the present study, tumor molecular profile analysis was performed using a 161 gene NGS panel, containing the majority of clinically significant genes for cancer treatment selection. A variety of tumor types have been analyzed, including aggressive and hard to treat cancers such as pancreatic cancer. Besides, the clinical utility of immunotherapy biomarkers (TMB, MSI, PD-L1), was also studied. Results Molecular profile analysis was conducted in 610 cancer patients, while in 393 of them a at least one biomarker for immunotherapy response was requested. An actionable alteration was detected in 77.87% of the patients. 54.75% of them received information related to on-label or off-label treatment (Tiers 1A.1, 1A.2, 2B, and 2C.1) and 21.31% received a variant that could be used for clinical trial inclusion. The addition to immunotherapy biomarker to targeted biomarkers’ analysis in 191 cases increased the number of patients with an on-label treatment recommendation by 22.92%, while an option for on-label or off-label treatment was provided in 71.35% of the cases. Conclusions Tumor molecular profile analysis using NGS is a first-tier method for a variety of tumor types and provides important information for decision making in the treatment of cancer patients. Importantly, simultaneous analysis for targeted therapy and immunotherapy biomarkers could lead to better tumor characterization and offer actionable information in the majority of patients. Furthermore, our data suggest that one in two patients may be eligible for on-label ICI treatment based on biomarker analysis. However, appropriate interpretation of results from such analysis is essential for implementation in clinical practice and accurate refinement of treatment strategy.

WOS: 000384744100006, PubMed ID: 27761279, Background: Prognostic factors and the standard treatment approach for gynaecological carcinosarcomas have not yet been clearly defined. Although carcinosarcomas are more aggressive than pure epithelial tumours, they are treated similarly. Serous/clear cell and endometrioid components may be predictive factors for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or radiotherapy (RT) or RT in patients with uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas. Heterologous carcinosarcomas may benefit more from adjuvant CT. Aims: We aimed to define the prognostic and predictive factors associated with treatment options in ovarian (OCS) and uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with ovarian and uterine carcinosarcoma from 2000 to 2013, and 127 women were included in this study (24 ovarian and 103 uterine). Patients admitted to seventeen oncology centres in Turkey between 2000 and December 2013 with a histologically proven diagnosis of uterine carcinosarcoma with FIGO 2009 stage I-III and patients with sufficient data obtained from well-kept medical records were included in this study. Stage IV tumours were excluded. The patient records were retrospectively reviewed. Data from 104 patients were evaluated for this study. Results: Age (>= 70 years) was a poor prognostic factor for UCS (p=0.036). Pelvic +/- para aortic lymph node dissection did not affect overall survival (OS) (p=0.35). Macroscopic residual disease was related with OS (p