Search

A recent review in this Journal, which criticizes NCCN’s recommendations based, in part, on the RTOG 9501 and the EORTC 22931 trials, warrants comment. We herein provide additional data addressing many of the points and misinterpretations raised in that review which convincingly supports the use of concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with good performance status and high-risk pathologic features after surgery for mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Purpose To report the long-term results of the Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 91-11 study evaluating the contribution of chemotherapy added to radiation therapy (RT) for larynx preservation. Patients and Methods Patients with stage III or IV glottic or supraglottic squamous cell cancer were randomly assigned to induction cisplatin/fluorouracil (PF) followed by RT (control arm), concomitant cisplatin/RT, or RT alone. The composite end point of laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was the primary end point. Results Five hundred twenty patients were analyzed. Median follow-up for surviving patients is 10.8 years. Both chemotherapy regimens significantly improved LFS compared with RT alone (induction chemotherapy v RT alone: hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.95; P = .02; concomitant chemotherapy v RT alone: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98; P = .03). Overall survival did not differ significantly, although there was a possibility of worse outcome with concomitant relative to induction chemotherapy (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.61; P = .08). Concomitant cisplatin/RT significantly improved the larynx preservation rate over induction PF followed by RT (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.89; P = .0050) and over RT alone (P < .001), whereas induction PF followed by RT was not better than treatment with RT alone (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.82; P = .35). No difference in late effects was detected, but deaths not attributed to larynx cancer or treatment were higher with concomitant chemotherapy (30.8% v 20.8% with induction chemotherapy and 16.9% with RT alone). Conclusion These 10-year results show that induction PF followed by RT and concomitant cisplatin/RT show similar efficacy for the composite end point of LFS. Locoregional control and larynx preservation were significantly improved with concomitant cisplatin/RT compared with the induction arm or RT alone. New strategies that improve organ preservation and function with less morbidity are needed.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a nonobligatory precursor to invasive breast cancer (IBC). With increased use of screening mammography to detect occult breast cancer, the incidence of DCIS has markedly increased. It is estimated that 1 million women will be living with this condition by 2020 (1,2). Left untreated, up to 53% of DCIS will progress to invasive breast cancer over a period of 10 or more years (3). Unfortunately, DCIS classifications used in clinical practice do not adequately predict the risk of DCIS recurrence and progression (4). Recently, a new pathologic grading system was proposed to improve the prediction of local recurrence (5). In this system, DCIS cases with high nuclear grade, predominantly solid architecture, and extensive (present in >50% of ducts) comedo-type necrosis had a particularly bad prognosis and were associated with recurrence or progression to IBC in less than 10 years. Sanders et al. examined the natural history of untreated, low-grade, noncomedo DCIS and showed that 39.3% of these patients developed invasive breast cancer in the same quadrant as the initial biopsy, with most events occurring within 10 to 15 years, but with some as late as 23 to 42 years after initial biopsy (6). Nearly half of the patients who developed invasive breast cancer died of metastatic disease 1 to 7 years after diagnosis. The results of this study suggest that a subset of patients with histologically low-grade DCIS will develop life-threatening invasive carcinoma. Stratifying DCIS patients using prognostic tumor markers might prevent both under and over treatment. Active investigation of the biological processes responsible for progression of DCIS to invasive disease may facilitate development of better prognostic tests. The 2009 State of Science National Institutes of Health Conference on Diagnosis and Management of DCIS recommended development of risk stratification tests based on a comprehensive understanding of the clinical, radiological, pathological, and biological factors (2). Numerous biomarkers have been investigated for risk stratification of patients with DCIS. For example, elevated Ki67 levels, p53 mutations, and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification are known to be associated with increased nuclear grade and necrosis, histologic features that are associated with DCIS recurrence and progression (7–9). Cell cycle markers have also been studied, including p21, p27, and cyclin D1 (10–12). Despite these studies, no single biomarker has emerged to guide clinical practice. Recently, retinoblastoma (RB) pathway disruption has been implicated in the invasive progression of DCIS. Gautier et al. reported that overexpression of p16ink4a and concomitant elevation of the proliferation marker Ki67 were observed in DCIS at risk for progressing to IBC (8). We confirmed this association in our DCIS cohort and demonstrated increased recurrence and invasive progression in tumors with elevated p16ink4a/Ki67 (13). Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is another tumor suppressor that is commonly lost in breast cancer (14–16). No cancers rely on only a single tumor suppressor abnormality for invasive tumor development. However, in a number of tumor types, including breast cancer, there is a subtype of RB and PTEN doubly deficient tumors. Genetic modeling in glioblastoma and other cancers has suggested cooperation between these pathways in disease progression (17). Although PTEN expression has been associated with breast cancer metastasis and poor survival in invasive breast cancer, its role in DCIS progression has not been investigated. The goal of this study was to define the role of RB and PTEN as prognostic biomarkers for DCIS recurrence and progression.

Purpose Previous analysis of this Intergroup trial demonstrated that with a median follow-up among surviving patients of 45.9 months, the concurrent postoperative administration of cisplatin and radiation therapy improved local-regional control and disease-free survival of patients who had high-risk resectable head-and-neck carcinomas. With a minimum of 10 years of follow-up potentially now available for all patients, these results are updated here to examine long-term outcomes. Methods and Materials A total of 410 analyzable patients who had high-risk resected head-and-neck cancers were prospectively randomized to receive either radiation therapy (RT: 60 Gy in 6 weeks) or identical RT plus cisplatin, 100 mg/m 2 i.v. on days 1, 22, and 43 (RT + CT). Results At 10 years, the local-regional failure rates were 28.8% vs 22.3% ( P =.10), disease-free survival was 19.1% vs 20.1% ( P =.25), and overall survival was 27.0% vs 29.1% ( P =.31) for patients treated by RT vs RT + CT, respectively. In the unplanned subset analysis limited to patients who had microscopically involved resection margins and/or extracapsular spread of disease, local-regional failure occurred in 33.1% vs 21.0% ( P =.02), disease-free survival was 12.3% vs 18.4% ( P =.05), and overall survival was 19.6% vs 27.1% ( P =.07), respectively. Conclusion At a median follow-up of 9.4 years for surviving patients, no significant differences in outcome were observed in the analysis of all randomized eligible patients. However, analysis of the subgroup of patients who had either microscopically involved resection margins and/or extracapsular spread of disease showed improved local-regional control and disease-free survival with concurrent administration of chemotherapy. The remaining subgroup of patients who were enrolled only because they had tumor in 2 or more lymph nodes did not benefit from the addition of CT to RT.

Purpose: To analyze the prospectively collected health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) data from patients enrolled in two Radiation Therapy Oncology Group randomized Phase III head and neck cancer trials (90-03 and 91-11) to assess their value as an independent prognostic factor for locoregional control (LRC) and/or overall survival (OS).Methods and Materials: HRQOL questionnaires, using a validated instrument, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H&N), version 2, were completed by patients before the start of treatment. OS and LRC were the outcome measures analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model.Results: Baseline FACT-H&N data were available for 1,093 patients and missing for 417 patients. No significant difference in outcome was found between the patients with and without baseline FACT-H&N data (p = 0.58). The median follow-up time was 27.2 months for all patients and 49 months for surviving patients. Multivariate analyses were performed for both OS and LRC. Beyond tumor and nodal stage, Karnofsky performance status, primary site, cigarette use, use of concurrent chemotherapy, and altered fractionation schedules, the FACT-H&N score was independently predictive of LRC (but not OS), with p = 0.0038. The functional well-being component of the FACT-H&N predicted most significantly for LRC (p = 0.0004).Conclusions: This study represents, to our knowledge, the largest analysis of HRQOL as a prognostic factor in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. The results of this study have demonstrated the importance of baseline HRQOL as a significant and independent predictor of LRC in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc.

Purpose To determine whether the addition of recombinant human erythropoietin (Epo) could improve the outcomes of anemic patients receiving definitive radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Methods and Materials Eligible patients had SCCHN, with a plan for continuous-course definitive radiotherapy (66–72 Gy) with or without chemotherapy. Patients with Stage III or IV SCCHN were required to undergo concurrent chemoradiotherapy and/or accelerated fractionation radiotherapy. Preradiotherapy hemoglobin was required to be between 9.0 g/dL and 13.5 g/dL (12.5 g/dL for women). Patients randomized to Epo received 40,000 U once weekly, starting 7–10 days before start of radiotherapy. Results A total of 148 patients were enrolled; 141 were evaluable. Median pretreatment hemoglobin was 12.1 g/dL. Hemoglobin levels at 4 weeks rose by an average of 1.66 g/dL in the Epo arm, compared with an average 0.24 g/dL decrease in the control arm (p = 0.0001). Median follow-up was 2.5 years (3.1 years for surviving patients). There was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint of local–regional failure (LRF) rate between the treatment arms. The 3-year LRF rate was 36% for control and 44% for Epo (p = 0.56). There were also no significant differences in local–regional progression-free survival (LRPFS), patterns of failure, overall survival, or toxicity. The 3-year LRPFS rate was 52% for control and 47% for Epo. The overall survival rate was 57% and 56%, respectively. Conclusions The addition of Epo to definitive radiotherapy for SCCHN did not improve outcomes. The study was not specifically designed to detect a potential negative association between Epo and tumor progression/survival.

Objectives: To assess whether microvessel density (MVD), an immunohistochemical marker for tumor vascularity, predicts for radiotherapy (RT) outcome in locally advanced HNSCC patients. Methods: A total of 459 patients, enrolled on the RTOG 90-03 trial, had biopsy specimens submitted, and a value for MVD determined, prior to definitive RT. 450 patients were analyzable for this study. Tumor microvessels were stained for factor VIII-related antigen using a standard immunoperoxidase method. The mean number of stained microvessel profiles, from three x200 fields containing the highest MVD (hot spot), was recorded as the MVD. A prospective value of ≥60 was chosen as the threshold for high MVD, tumor vascularity. Results: The median follow-up for the analyzable patients with MVD assessment was 22.0 months and 79.1 months for all living patients. There were no differences concerning the pretreatment characteristics between those RTOG 90-03 patients with a value for MVD and those without a value for MVD. Thus, the present study cohort possessed comparable characteristics with the entire RTOG 90-03 population. MVD values ranged from 5 to 80, with a median value of 30. Only 37 of 450 (8.2%) patients possessed an MVD ≥60. There were no outcome differences for patients with MVD

We aimed to examine deficiencies in established methods of summarising adverse events, and to create a new reporting system (TAME) for summarising the toxicity burden of cancer treatment. TAME consolidates traditional adverse-event data into three risk domains: short-term (acute) Toxicity (T), Adverse long-term (late) effects (A), and Mortality risk (M) generated by a treatment programme (E=End results); and assigns treatments to risk classes for each risk domain.We examined formally an established method for summarising adverse events (the max-grade method) in five trials of patients with head and neck cancer done between September, 1991, and August, 2000, by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) that involved 13 treatment groups (2304 patients). We calculated TAME summary metrics that included time and multiplicity factors in the same patient groups. We compared relative T values with relative values for toxic effects from the max-grade approach. We also calculated the range of individual patient T scores in two groups from one of the trials (the laryngeal-preservation trial).The max-grade method systematically excluded 29-70% of total reported high-grade (grade 3-4) acute adverse events, contained progressive bias, and favoured higher toxicity programmes. Relative T values in the 13 treatment programmes tested showed an increase of almost 500% in acute toxicity burden (100-590) between treatment groups compared with a 170% increase (100-270) between treatment groups by use of the max-grade method. The difference between these two summary systems was statistically significant (mean difference -102 [95% CI -167 to -37], p=0.005, t test for paired differences). Four risk classes were designated for acute and relative late effects: low (100-140), moderate (150-390), high (400-490), and extreme (or=500). The distribution of individual patient T scores showed that 82 (60%) patients who received concurrent platinum-radiotherapy for larynx preservation reported two or more high-grade events, and 34 (20%) reported four or more high-grade events; these findings differed significantly from the distribution of individual patient T scores for patients who received radiotherapy alone, in which 32 (19%) reported two or more high-grade events and 3 (3%) reported four or more high-grade events (p0.0001). The max-grade method also systematically excluded 26-48% of high-grade (grade 3-4) late adverse events. However, less variation was noted in the relative risk of late events (100-270) by the TAME method for late effects.Traditional methods for summarising adverse events systematically exclude important data, giving an inaccurate impression of the toxicity burden in complex multimodality trials. By contrast, T values use data on all high-grade adverse events. T values are proportional to the intensity of treatment, showing a 500% increase between treatment groups in acute toxicity burden in RTOG trials of head and neck cancer done during this study interval. TAME reporting provides a concise and uniform method to compare relative risk among treatment options. Future studies should include testing the performance of the TAME system in additional datasets (from different research organisations and disease sites), prospective correlation of TAME endpoints with predefined outcome measures, and assessment of its usefulness in clinical decision making.

Purpose This study evaluated whether males without partners were disadvantaged for survival in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) head and neck cancer clinical trials. Methods Patients treated on three RTOG trials were studied. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine if sex and the interaction between sex and marital/partner status were independent prognostic variables for overall survival controlling for Karnofsky performance status, tumor stage, nodal stage, primary site, and protocol treatment. Results A total of 1,901 patients (1,509 men) were entered onto the three RTOG trials, with 1,822 (1,438 men) analyzable patients. Prognostic variables independent of disease-related variables for survival in multivariate analyses restricted to men were age, marital/partner status, and income. Conclusion The apparent disadvantage of unpartnered men is striking, even after controlling for disease and other demographic variables. Possible explanations could easily be tested in observational studies, leading to evaluation of simple interventions to improve their outcome.

BACKGROUND: Several trials have studied the role of unconventional fractionated radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, but the effect of such treatment on survival is not clear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess whether this type of radiotherapy could improve survival. METHODS: Randomised trials comparing conventional radiotherapy with hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy, or both, in patients with non-metastatic HNSCC were identified and updated individual patient data were obtained. Overall survival was the main endpoint. Trials were grouped in three pre-specified categories: hyperfractionated, accelerated, and accelerated with total dose reduction. FINDINGS: 15 trials with 6515 patients were included. The median follow-up was 6 years. Tumours sites were mostly oropharynx and larynx; 5221 (74%) patients had stage III-IV disease (International Union Against Cancer, 1987). There was a significant survival benefit with altered fractionated radiotherapy, corresponding to an absolute benefit of 3.4% at 5 years (hazard ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.97; p=0.003). The benefit was significantly higher with hyperfractionated radiotherapy (8% at 5 years) than with accelerated radiotherapy (2% with accelerated fractionation without total dose reduction and 1.7% with total dose reduction at 5 years, p=0.02). There was a benefit on locoregional control in favour of altered fractionation versus conventional radiotherapy (6.4% at 5 years; p

Purpose Oral mucositis (OM) causes significant morbidity during the course of radiotherapy (RT) treatment of head-and-neck cancer. It is hypothesized that infection plays a role in the development of OM. We tested the efficacy of iseganan HCl (iseganan), a synthetic peptide with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, for preventing RT-associated OM. Methods A multinational, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was performed on patients receiving primary RT, primary chemoradiotherapy or postoperative RT. Patients were randomized to receive iseganan oral solution plus standard-of-care oral hygiene (SOC), placebo plus SOC, or SOC alone throughout the RT administration period. The severity of OM was assessed by NCI-CTC scoring and clinical symptoms by patient questionnaire. Results A total of 545 patients were randomized to the study. Nine percent of the patients in both the iseganan and placebo groups did not develop ulcerative OM (Grades 2, 3, 4) ( p = 0.998) whereas only 2% of the patients receiving SOC alone remained free of oral ulceration ( p = 0.049). The maximum severity of mouth pain and difficulty swallowing did not differ in patients treated with iseganan or placebo. However, patients in both intervention groups reported less mouth pain and difficulty swallowing than did patients receiving SOC alone. Nausea was the only adverse event that occurred with ≥5% increased frequency in the iseganan group than in either the placebo or SOC groups (51% vs. 42% vs. 46%). Adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation and death did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion Iseganan oral solution was safe but did not reduce the risk for developing ulcerative OM relative to placebo. Intensified oral hygiene or the administration of the vehicle used to deliver study drug in this trial appears to have reduced the risk and severity of OM. Our results suggest that antimicrobial intervention may not meaningfully affect the pathogenesis of radiation-induced OM.

Purpose: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Protocol 92–02 was a randomized trial testing long-term (LT) adjuvant androgen deprivation (AD) after initial AD with external-beam radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PC; T2c-4) and with prostate-specific antigen level less than 150 ng/mL. Patients and Methods: Patients received a total of 4 months of goserelin and flutamide, 2 months before and 2 months during RT. A radiation dose of 65 to 70 Gy was given to the prostate and a dose of 44 to 50 Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes. Patients were randomly assigned to receive no additional therapy (short-term [ST]AD-RT) or 24 months of goserelin (LTAD-RT); 1,554 patients were entered onto the study. Results: The LTAD-RT arm showed significant improvement in all efficacy end points except overall survival (OS; 80.0% v 78.5% at 5 years, P = .73), compared with the STAD-RT arm. In a subset of patients not part of the original study design, with tumors assigned Gleason scores of 8 to 10 by the contributing institutions, the LTAD-RT arm had significantly better OS (81.0% v 70.7%, P = .044). There was a small but significant increase in the frequency of late radiation grades 3, 4, and 5 gastrointestinal toxicity ascribed to the LTAD-RT arm (2.6% v 1.2% at 5 years, P = .037), the cause of which is not clear. Conclusion: The RTOG 92–02 trial supports the addition of LT adjuvant AD to STAD with RT for T2c-4 PC. In the exploratory subset analysis of patients with Gleason scores 8 to 10, LT adjuvant AD resulted in a survival advantage.

Purpose: The optimal fractionation schedule for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer has been controversial. The objective of this randomized trial was to test the efficacy of hyperfractionation and two types of accelerated fractionation individually against standard fractionation. Methods and Materials: Patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy delivered with: 1) standard fractionation at 2 Gy/fraction/day, 5 days/week, to 70 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks; 2) hyperfractionation at 1.2 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 5 days/week to 81.6 Gy/68 fractions/7 weeks; 3) accelerated fractionation with split at 1.6 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 5 days/week, to 67.2 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks including a 2-week rest after 38.4 Gy; or 4) accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost at 1.8 Gy/fraction/day, 5 days/week and 1.5 Gy/fraction/day to a boost field as a second daily treatment for the last 12 treatment days to 72 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks. Of the 1113 patients entered, 1073 patients were analyzable for outcome. The median follow-up was 23 months for all analyzable patients and 41.2 months for patients alive. Results: Patients treated with hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost had significantly better local-regional control (p = 0.045 and p = 0.050 respectively) than those treated with standard fractionation. There was also a trend toward improved disease-free survival (p = 0.067 and p = 0.054 respectively) although the difference in overall survival was not significant. Patients treated with accelerated fractionation with split had similar outcome to those treated with standard fractionation. All three altered fractionation groups had significantly greater acute side effects compared to standard fractionation. However, there was no significant increase of late effects. Conclusions: Hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost are more efficacious than standard fractionation for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Acute but not late effects are also increased.

Background.—Under the auspices of the College of American Pathologists, a multidisciplinary group of clinicians, pathologists, and statisticians considered prognostic and predictive factors in prostate cancer and stratified them into categories reflecting the strength of published evidence and taking into account the expert opinions of the Prostate Working Group members. Materials and Methods.—Factors were ranked according to the previous College of American Pathologists categorical rankings: category I, factors proven to be of prognostic importance and useful in clinical patient management; category II, factors that have been extensively studied biologically and clinically but whose importance remains to be validated in statistically robust studies; and category III, all other factors not sufficiently studied to demonstrate their prognostic value. Factors in categories I and II were considered with respect to variations in methods of analysis, interpretation of findings, reporting of data, and statistical evaluation. For each factor, detailed recommendations for improvement were made. Recommendations were based on the following aims: (1) increasing uniformity and completeness of pathologic evaluation of tumor specimens, (2) enhancing the quality of data collected pertaining to existing prognostic factors, and (3) improving patient care. Results and Conclusions.—Factors ranked in category I included preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level, TNM stage grouping, histologic grade as Gleason score, and surgical margin status. Category II factors included tumor volume, histologic type, and DNA ploidy. Factors in category III included perineural invasion, neuroendocrine differentiation, microvessel density, nuclear roundness, chromatin texture, other karyometric factors, proliferation markers, prostate-specific antigen derivatives, and other factors (oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, apoptosis genes, etc).

BACKGROUND Despite encouraging results with chemoradiation as the primary means of managing carcinoma of the anal canal, approximately 20% of patients will develop a local recurrence. This study examined the prognostic significance of p53 nuclear protein overexpression in the pretreatment biopsies of patients treated with chemoradiation for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. METHODS All patients were treated in a prospective, randomized Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial (RTOG 87-04) in which radiotherapy to the pelvis was compared with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or 5-FU and mitomycin-C. Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded blocks or unstained slides from the pretreatment biopsies of 64 patients were obtained from referring institutions and evaluated immunohistochemically with the polyclonal p53 antibody CM-1. A multivariate analysis was conducted to analyze overexpression of p53 in terms of locoregional control, no evidence of disease (NED), and overall survival. RESULTS p53 protein was overexpressed in 48.4% of the cases. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for patients whose tumors overexpressed p53 to have inferior locoregional control (52% vs. 72%, P = 0.13), NED survival (52% vs. 68%, P = 0.27), and absolute survival (58% vs. 78%, P = 0.14). Of all the pretreatment factors analyzed, only International Union Against Cancer stage was predictive of outcome in multivariate analysis. Among those patients whose tumors overexpressed p53, there was a trend toward improved outcome in the arm that received 5-FU and mitomycin-C compared with the arm that received 5-FU only. CONCLUSIONS Overexpression of the p53 protein may be associated with inferior outcome for patients managed with definitive chemoradiation for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer 1999;85:1226–33. © 1999 American Cancer Society.

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the pharmacokinetic monitoring and drug dose adjustment of Etanidazole (Eta) in patients treated on the RTOG randomized trial for Stage III and IV head and neck cancer. Methods and Materials: From June, 1986 to October, 1991, 521 patients were randomized to conventional RT alone or RT plus Eta. The primary goal was to determine whether the addition of Eta to conventional radiation therapy improves local-regional control and tumor-free survival. Of the 264 patients who received Eta, 233 had their drug exposure calculated and the Eta dose and schedule adjusted accordingly to prevent the occurrence of serious peripheral neuropathy. Drug exposure was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) for a single treatment that was calculated by the integral over time of the serum concentration of Eta. The total drug exposure (total-AUC) was estimated by multiplying the AUC by the number of drug administrations. Results: Eighteen percent of patients developed Grade I and 6% developed Grade II peripheral neuropathy. There was no Grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy. There is a trend for an increased risk of neuropathy by single dose AUC. The minimal difference in incidence of neuropathy by single-dose AUC was due to the use of dose and schedule modification for patients with the higher values. Conclusions: The pharmacokinetics investigated in this study confirm previous work that monitoring Eta levels, with dose adjustment, allows it to be used safely in the clinic. In a subset analysis there was a statistically significant improvement in local-regional control and survival rates for patients with N0 and N1 disease, that will require confirmation (14). However, the clinical efficacy of Eta in this trial proved to be of little overall benefit.

Survival outcome of 1592 analyzable patients on four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) studies in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer were studied utilizing a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). This approach creates a regression tree according to prognostic variables which partitions into homogenous subsets according to survival. Four protocols, RTOG 83-11, 83-21, 84-03 and 84-07 were analyzed. 83-11 and 84-07 were studies utilizing irradiation with alterfractionation; 83-21 and 84-03 were studies evaluating thymocin with irradiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation with thoracic irradiation respectively. Nine pretreatment variables and one treatment variable were analyzed. Adjustment for radiotherapy effect was made in the accelerated treatment protocol (84-07). Overall, median survival for the entire group was 9.0 months with 17% alive at 2 years. Univariate analysis suggests that KPS,or = 70 vs. 80-100, pleural effusion, weight loss,or = 5% vs. 5%, age, 60+ vs.60, T stage (T1 and T2 vs. T3 and T4) and N stage (N- vs. N+) were important prognastic factors. Radiation dose, sex, race and histology were not univariate prognastic factors. RPA identified KPS as the most significant covariate (median survival 5.9 mos.or = 70 vs. 9.9 mos. 80-100). Within KPS 80-100 other splits occurred for N stage, age, weight loss and radiation therapy dose. KPSor = 70 split at pleural effusion only. The best overall RPA tree has four distinct classes with median survival times ranging from 3.3 to 12.6 months. The RPA classes were validated in an independent non-small cell lung cancer dataset. This analysis may allow more intelligent stratification and study-design for future RTOG trials in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

The Patterns of Care Study in Radiation Oncology has documented United States national averages for the evaluation and treatment of prostate cancer from 1973 to 1994. We report the characteristics of patient populations, treatment characteristics, and outcomes of care.

The purpose of this article is to describe the methodology used by the Patterns of Care Study to conduct surveys of the practice of radiation oncology that not only provide national averages for process and outcome measures but also allow comparisons among important subgroups. The article describes how the sample design assures that these analyses are possible and presents methods used for data collection and analysis.

The p53 tumor suppressor gene (also known as TP53) is one of the most frequently mutated genes in human cancer. Several studies have shown that p53 mutations are infrequent in prostate cancer and are associated with advanced disease.We assessed the prognostic value of identifying abnormal p53 protein expression in the tumors of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer who were treated with either external-beam radiation therapy alone or total androgen blockade before and during the radiation therapy.The study population consisted of a subset of patients entered in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 8610 ("a phase III trial of Zoladex and flutamide used as cytoreductive agents in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy"). Immunohistochemical detection of abnormal p53 protein in pretreatment specimens (i.e., needle biopsies or transurethral resections) was achieved by use of the monoclonal anti-p53 antibody DO7; specimens in which 20% or more of the tumor cell nuclei showed positive immunoreactivity were considered to have abnormal p53 protein expression. Associations between p53 protein expression status and the time to local progression, the incidence of distant metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated in univariate (logrank test) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazards model) analyses. Reported P values are two-sided.One hundred twenty-nine (27%) of the 471 patients entered in the trial had sufficient tumor material for analysis. Abnormal p53 protein expression was detected in the tumors of 23 (18%) of these 129 patients. Statistically significant associations were found between the presence of abnormal p53 protein expression and increased incidence of distant metastases (P = .04), decreased progression-free survival (P = .03), and decreased overall survival (P = .02); no association was found between abnormal p53 protein expression and the time to local progression (P = .58). These results were independent of the Gleason score and clinical stage. A significant treatment interaction was detected with respect to the development of distant metastases: Among patients receiving both radiation therapy and hormone therapy, those with tumors exhibiting abnormal p53 protein expression experienced a reduced time to the development of distant metastases (P = .001); for patients treated with radiation therapy alone, the time to distant metastases was unrelated to p53 protein expression status (P = .91).Determination of p53 protein expression status yield significant, independent prognostic information concerning the development of distant metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer who are treated primarily with radiation therapy.The interaction of radiation therapy plus hormone therapy and abnormal p53 protein expression may provide a clinical link to experimental evidence that radiation therapy and/or hormone therapy act, at least in part, by the induction of apoptosis (a cell death program) and suggests that this mechanism may be blocked in patients whose tumors have p53 mutations.

The diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an increasingly common event due to widespread use of screening mammography. However, appropriate clinical management of DCIS is a major challenge in the absence of prognostic markers. Tumor-initiating cells may be particularly relevant for disease pathogenesis; therefore, two markers associated with such cells, EZH2 and ALDH1, were evaluated. A cohort of 248 DCIS patients was used to determine the association of EZH2 and ALDH1 with ipsilateral breast event, DCIS recurrence and progression to invasive breast cancer (IBC). In this cohort, high EZH2 expression was associated with the risk of an ipsilateral breast event and DCIS recurrence but not invasive progression. ALDH1 expression was observed in both the tumor and stromal compartment; however, in neither compartment were ALDH1 levels independently associated with evaluated study endpoints. Interestingly, the combination of high EZH2 with high epithelial ALDH1 was associated with disease progression. Therefore, ALDH1 within the DCIS lesion can add to the prognostic significance of EZH2, particularly in the context of risk of development of invasive disease.

PURPOSE Definitive chemoradiation (CR) has replaced radical surgery as the preferred treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. To determine the importance of mitomycin (MMC) in the standard CR regimen and to assess the role of salvage CR in patients who have residual tumor following CR, a phase III randomized trial was undertaken by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between August 1988 and December 1991, 310 patients were randomized to receive either radiotherapy (RT) and fluorouracil (5-FU) or radiotherapy, 5-FU, and MMC. Of 291 assessable patients, 145 received 45 to 50.4 Gy of pelvic RT plus 5-FU at 1,000 mg/m2/d for 4 days, and 146 received RT, 5-FU, and MMC (10 mg/m2 per dose for two doses). Patients with residual tumor on posttreatment biopsy were treated with a salvage regimen that consisted of additional pelvic RT (9 Gy), 5-FU, and cisplatin (100 mg/m2). RESULTS Posttreatment biopsies were positive in 15% of patients in the 5-FU arm versus 7.7% in the MMC arm (P = .135). At 4 years, colostomy rates were lower (9% v 22%; P = .002), colostomy-free survival higher (71% v 59%; P = .014), and disease-free survival higher (73% v 51%; P = .0003) in the MMC arm. A significant difference in overall survival has not been observed at 4 years. Toxicity was greater in the MMC arm (23% v 7% grade 4 and 5 toxicity; P < or = .001). Of 24 assessable patients who underwent salvage CR, 12 (50%) were rendered disease-free. CONCLUSION Despite greater toxicity, the use of MMC in a definitive CR regimen for anal cancer is justified, particularly in patients with large primary tumors. Salvage CR should be attempted in patients with residual disease following definitive CR before resorting to radical surgery.

During the past 25 years, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has played a major role in head and neck cancer clinical research. The major research themes for recent and currently active trials have been: (a) combined modality therapy, (b) altered fractionation radiotherapy, (c) hypoxic cell sensitizers, (d) organ preservation, (e) chemoprevention, and (f) clinical/laboratory correlations. For advanced operable disease, the RTOG showed improved local-regional control with postoperative radiotherapy as compared to preoperative radiotherapy for carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx and hypopharynx. This established the use of surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy as the standard treatment in subsequent RTOG and Intergroup trials for operable disease. For advanced inoperable disease, the RTOG demonstrated the feasibility of testing altered fractionation radiotherapy in a multiinstitutional clinical trials setting. A Phase III trial comparing hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation to conventional fractionation is now in progress. Phase I/II combined modality studies established the efficacy of concurrent high-dose cisplatin and radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced disease and provided the basis for further testing in Phase III trials for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, larynx preservation, and high-risk advanced operable disease. Analysis of the extensive RTOG Head and Neck Cancer database established the incidence of second malignancies and their adverse impact on patients whose initial tumors were cured by radiotherapy, and provided the basis for chemoprevention trials. Recursive partitioning analysis identified 6 distinct prognostically homogeneous patient groups based on pretreatment tumor or patient characteristics and/or treatment variables. Retrospective analysis identified tumor p105 antigen density as an independent prognostic indicator in patients irradiated for head and neck cancer. Future trials will continue to focus on the reduction of morbidity and mortality, and improvement of the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients through innovative radiotherapy delivery, multimodality approaches, use of chemical and biological modifiers, and other novel therapies, identification of clinical and biological prognostic indicators, and prevention or diminution of acute morbidity and late complications of the disease and its treatment.

Purpose : To obtain reliable data on the extent of the brachytherapy practice in the United States by conducting a comprehensive survey of all facilities. Methods and Materials : The Clinical Research Committee of the AES surveyed all 1321 radiation oncology facilities identified in the Patterns of Care Study (PCS) of the American College of Radiology (ACR). Multiple mailings and follow-up were made to obtain a high response rate. Survey responders and nonresponders were compared using chi-square tests. Summary statistics were reported. Results : Of the 1321 facilities, 1054 responded (80%). Hospital-based and larger facilities had a statistically significant higher rate of response. Brachytherapy was being performed at 819 facilities (the median number of procedures = 21–50). Two hundred and two facilities did no brachytherapy. The common isotopes used were 137Cs (705 facilities), 192Ir (585 facilities), 125I (236 facilities), and 131I (194 facilities). The common brachytherapy techniques used were intacavitary (751 facilities), interstitial (536 facilities), intraluminal (310 facilities), and placques (148 facilities). Remote afterloaded brachytherapy was used at 205 centers as follows: high dose rate (HDR) (164), medium dose rate (MDR) (5), and low dose rate (LDR) (36). Computerized dosimetry was most commonly used (790 facilities), followed by Patterson-Parker (104 facilities) and Quimby (72 facilities). The common sites treated were cervix (701 facilities), endometrium (565 facilities), head and neck (354 facilities), and lung (344 facilities). Conclusions : data regarding brachytherapy practice has been obtained from a large percentage (80%) of all facilities in the United States. The majority (78–81%) of radiation oncology facilities perform brachytherapy; however, its use is restricted to gynecological implants in many of these centers. The results from this survey will be used to develop a pattern of care study and data registry in brachytherapy.

Background. Hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX), which may permit higher total doses of radiation therapy without increased toxic effects to normal tissues, has been used with pelvic tumors, but its combination with brachytherapy has not been well studied. Methods. A prospective Phase I/II trial was designed to study HFX with brachytherapy in patients with bulky Stage IB and IIA, IIB, III, and IVA carcinomas of the cervix. HFX doses of 1.2 Gy were administered to the whole pelvis twice daily at 4-6 hour intervals, 5 days per week; the total dose to the whole pelvis was 24-48 Gy. External pelvic irradiation was followed by one or two intracavitary applications to deliver the total minimum dose of 85 Gy at point A and 65 Gy to the lateral pelvic nodes

Patient compliance with the increasingly complex adjuvant therapy protocols has always been of concern, particularly in the head and neck cancer population. The Head and Neck Intergroup recently concluded a phase III prospective randomized trial testing the addition of three courses of cisplatinum containing combination chemotherapy to standard treatment defined as surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for advanced stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma. The chemotherapy was administered following the surgery prior to the postoperative radiotherapy. Variation from protocol is ranked retrospectively as minor acceptable, major acceptable, and major unacceptable. The incidence of major unacceptable variation from the protocol for radiotherapy immediately following the surgery was 15% vs. 19% in the population that completed all three courses of the chemotherapy (P < 0.10). However, for those patients that completed less than the three courses of chemotherapy, the incidence of major unacceptable variation in radiotherapy was 33% (P < 0.001). This observation was controlled for site, stage, performance status, age, sex, surgical margins and experience of participating institution. We conclude that compliance with a multicourse adjuvant chemotherapy regimen is predictive of subsequent compliance to radiotherapy in the head and neck cancer population.

A major activity of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has been the investigational treatment of bronchogenic carcinoma. The goal of the RTOG has been to improve survival with an emphasis on local control primarily in unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. RTOG 73-01 [l] demonstrated a dose response relationship of irradiation to local control with a dose escalation of external beam irradiation from 40 to 60 Gy, and an incremental improvement in short term survival was also observed with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (Table 1). Unfortunately, this effect did not result in improved long term survival and ultimately, 70% of these patients failed locally. In an attempt to improve these poor results but encourage by the short term dose response for local control and survival, the RTOG has initiated studies investigating the use of biologics, altered fractionation, hypoxic cell sensitizers and cytotoxic chemotherapy delivered with irradiation in non-small cell lung cancer. The major clinical effort of the entire group during the past 10 years has been an emphasis on altered fractionation. Table 2 depicts many of these trials and summarizes the number of patients entered on study [2]. RTOG 83-11 was the largest Phase II trial in unresectable non-small cell lung cancer evaluating the use of altered fractionation and forms the basis for many of the group’s current trials. During the past 5 years the group

A major activity of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) during the past 20 years has been clinical trial development in bronchogenic carcinoma. In RTOG 73-01, the group was able to demonstrate a dose response to external beam irradiation in unresectable lung cancer. In spite of an improved response rate and a short-term benefit in survival, no long-term benefit in survival has been demonstrated (Table 1). Patients continue to exhibit a high incidence of local failure (-70%) with longer follow-up. In order to improve these results, the RTOG has conducted a series of randomized trials evaluating biologic response modifiers, hypoxic cell sensitizers, altered fractionation and chemo-sensitization. Trials involving hypoxic sensitizers and biologics have not yielded positive results for these agents. Phase III trials involving altered fractionation and chemotherapy are ongoing. The purpose of this report is to summarize the group’s activities with altered fractionation in lung cancer. Table 2 lists group studies designed to test altered fractionation in all disease sites. We can define “standard fractionation” as 1.8 to 2.0 Gy delivered as a single fraction daily, 5 days per week, to 60 to 70 Gy. Variations on this schedule constitute altered fraction. Discussion will be limited to the schedules defined as follows: Hyper~kzctionution: The size of the dose per fraction is reduced, the number of total fractions is increased, the total dose is slightly increased and the overall time is relatively unchanged. Treatment is usually given two or more times daily. Hypofractionation: The size of the dose per fraction is increased, the number of dose fractions is decreased, the total dose is decreased and the relative time is unchanged. Treatment is usually given one to three times a week. Accelerated fractionation: The overall time of treatment is significantly reduced, the

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX) attempts to overcome tumor proliferation during treatment by permitting higher total doses in the same overall time as standard fractionation. Whereas interruptions, including splits, reduce local control with standard fractionation in carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts, HFX might compensate for interruptions. Patients were randomized to receive total doses of 6720, 7200, 7680, and 8160 cGy, using 120 cGy twice daily, 5 days per week. Those analyzed received +/- 4% of assigned total dose and lived 90 days or more. Treatment was completed within 5 days of the time specified for each treatment arm in 233 patients; 48, 80, and 131 patients had delays 14, 10, and 5 days or more, respectively. Locoregional control and survival were significantly (P less than or equal to 0.03) reduced with delays of 5 days or more when corrected for prognostic factors. Late effects of radiation therapy were not affected by interruptions. These data support the hypothesis that proliferation (possibly accelerated) of tumor clonogens during treatment influences the outcome.

Purpose To validate lysyl oxidase (LOX), a hypoxia-related protein, as a marker for metastasis in an independent head and neck cancer (HNC) patient group enrolled onto a prospective trial. Patients and Methods We performed traditional immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) for LOX expression in 66 HNC patients from one institution. We also performed AQUA staining for LOX in 306 of 1,113 patients treated on a phase III trial comparing four radiation fractionation schedules in locally advanced HNC (RTOG 90-03). Pretreatment characteristics and outcome were similar between patients with and without LOX assessment. We correlated AQUA LOX expression with time to metastasis (TTM), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Results LOX expression from both staining methods predicted for TTM in the first 66 patients. Multivariate analysis, controlling for significant parameters including nodal stage and performance status, revealed tumor LOX expression, as a continuous variable, was an independent predictor for TTM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.33; P = .0001), TTP (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.10; P = .0069), and OS (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.07; P = .0311) in RTOG 90-03 patients. This translates into a 259% increase in metastatic risk for a patient at the 75th percentile of LOX compared with one at the 25th percentile. Conclusion AQUA LOX expression was strongly associated with increased metastasis, progression, and death in RTOG 90-03 patients. This study validates that LOX is a marker for metastasis and survival in HNC.

Despite initial efficacy of imatinib mesylate in most gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients, many experience primary/secondary drug resistance. Therefore, clinical management of GIST may benefit from further molecular characterization of tumors before and after imatinib mesylate treatment. As part of a recent phase II trial of neoadjuvant/adjuvant imatinib mesylate treatment for advanced primary and recurrent operable GISTs (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group S0132), gene expression profiling using oligonucleotide microarrays was done on tumor samples obtained before and after imatinib mesylate therapy. Patients were classified according to changes in tumor size after treatment based on computed tomography scan measurements. Gene profiling data were evaluated with Statistical Analysis of Microarrays to identify differentially expressed genes (in pretreatment GIST samples). Based on Statistical Analysis of Microarrays [False Discovery Rate (FDR), 10%], 38 genes were expressed at significantly lower levels in the pretreatment biopsy samples from tumors that significantly responded to 8 to 12 weeks of imatinib mesylate, that is, >25% tumor reduction. Eighteen of these genes encoded Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) domain containing zinc finger (ZNF) transcriptional repressors. Importantly, 10 KRAB-ZNF genes mapped to a single locus on chromosome 19p, and a subset predicted likely response to imatinib mesylate–based therapy in a naïve panel of GIST. Furthermore, we found that modifying expression of genes within this predictive signature can enhance the sensitivity of GIST cells to imatinib mesylate. Using clinical pretreatment biopsy samples from a prospective neoadjuvant phase II trial, we have identified a gene signature that includes KRAB-ZNF 91 subfamily members that may be both predictive of and functionally associated with likely response to short-term imatinib mesylate treatment. [Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(8):2172–82]

I t is estimated that in 1991, 16,700 new cases of primary central nervous system tumors will be diagnosed in the United States, and that 11,500 patients will succumb to their disease.’ Malignant gliomas comprise 33% to 45% of primary brain tumors,2’3 and of these, nearly 85% are glioblastoma multiforme.2’4 The 1980 patterns of care survey for brain tumor patients conducted by the Joint Section on Central Nervous System Tumors of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer found that the 5-year survival rate for patients with anaplastic astrocytomas was 18%, while it was only 5% for those with glioblastoma multiforme.* With few exceptions, there has been little improvement in the outcome of patients with malignant gliomas over the past decade. Prospective clinical studies have shown both the efficacy and the shortcomings of conventional radiation therapy in the treatment of malignant gliomas.5,6 The response of these lesions to standard radiotherapeutic techniques is limited by their striking inherent radioresistance’ and the radiosensitivity of the surrounding normal brain tissue.’ In addition to pursuing more effective chemotherapy programs, research strategies have focused on methods designed to enhance the effectiveness of external irradiation using hypoxic cell radiosensitizers, halogenated pyrimidine analogs, and altered fractionation schemes, or to selectively augment the tumor dose using interstitial brachytherapy. Single-institution and cooperative group studies using these approaches are now in progress. This review examines

A prospective, randomized, multi-institutional, Phase I(LE)/II trial of HFX was conducted by the RTOG between 1983 and 1987. Patients with histologically proven, inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts stratified by site, nodal status, and performance status, were assigned to one of three arms, were assigned to one of three arms, 67.2 Gy, 72.0 Gy, or 76.8 Gy. Fractions of 1.2 Gy were given twice daily, 5 days per week: intervals of 4 to 8 hours were permitted between fractions. After acceptable rates of acute normal tissue effects were found, the randomization was changed to evaluate a new higher total dose, 81.6 Gy. Of 479 patients entered, 447 were analyzed, 63 on 67.2 Gy, 129 on 72.0 Gy, 117 on 76.8 Gy, and 138 on 81.6 Gy. The treatment arms were well balanced with respect to pretreatment characteristics. Acute reactions consisted almost entirely of pseudomembranous inflammation. "Severe" (Grade 3) acute reactions were reported in 33% to 41% and grade 4 reactions were found in 0 to 3% of patients, with no differences in frequencies among the four arms. Toxicities that developed or persisted beyond 90 days after the first treatment (408 patients evaluable greater than 90 days) did not differ among arms: grade 3+ reactions occurred in 10% to 14%, and grade 4+ effects (necroses) were reported in 5% at 67.2 Gy, 3% at 72.0 Gy, 7% at 76.8 Gy, and 2% at 81.6 Gy. Grade 3+ acute reactions occurred in 40% of patients when the interfraction interval was less than or equal to 4.5 hours versus 31% with greater than 4.5 hours (p = .03). Interfraction intervals less than or equal to 4.5 hours were associated with higher frequencies of grade 4+ late effects in all four arms, 8% of 197 patients with less than or equal to 4.5 hours versus 1% of 211 patients with greater than 4.5 hours. Estimates of late toxicity at 1, 2, and 3 years were 5.5%, 9.8%, and 15.4% with intervals less than or equal to 4.5 hours, versus 1.7% at all three periods for greater than 4.5 hours (p = .006). Local-regional control at 2 years was 25% for the assigned dose of 67.2 Gy compared to 43% to 45% for the three higher doses (p = .01), but a similar comparison for survival showed no significant difference (p = .35). There was no evidence for an effect of interfraction interval on either local-regional control (p = .38) or survival (p = .28).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A previously reported Phase I/II multimodality program for non-resectable hepatocellular cancer began with external beam-radiation and chemotherapy, followed by administration of 131I antiferritin-specific radioimmunoglobulin and led to a 48% remission (7% complete remission and 41% partial remission). Survival and response depended on alpha fetoprotein status. AFP+ patients had a median survival of 5 months; AFP- patients had a median survival of 10.5 months. No acute effects occurred relative to treatment with radiolabeled antibody. A randomized prospective study was designed to compare full dose chemotherapy consisting of 60 mg/m2, doxorubicin and 500 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil administered every 3 weeks, to 131I antiferritin administration every 8 weeks and allowed for crossover treatment if tumor progression occurred. Overall, radiolabeled antibody administration and full dose chemotherapy led to equivalent partial remission rates (22-30% vs 23-25%) and survival rates compared to chemotherapy (6 month median; AFP+ 5 months; AFP- 10 months). The most important new observations were the response in AFP- patients who, following chemotherapy failure, achieved remission using 131I radiolabeled antibody (7/11) and a subset of patients (7%) who were treated with radiolabeled antibody and converted from non-resectable to resectable status followed by surgical excision.

For all randomized trials since 1978, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group has required the study chairman for radiation therapy to review the treatment given to each patient. The chairman scores the compliance of the treatment borders, total dose, fraction, and total elapsed time relative to the protocol prescription at the primary site, regional nodes, and any critical structure. The individual parameters are then considered together to derive an “overall” treatment score. For two RTOG head and neck studies in patients with moderately and very advanced carcinomas, the “overall” treatment was classified as unacceptable if the treatment at primary was scored unacceptable with respect to dose, fractionation, and field borders. However, prolonged elapsed treatment was not included. Analysis of these studies with 426 evaluable patients was performed to assess the relationship of unacceptable “overall” treatment compliance with outcome. Patients with prolonged treatment elapsed days (14 days beyond the protocol prescription) exhibited significantly poorer loco-regional control (13% vs. 27% at 3 years with p = .007) and absolute survival (13% vs. 26% at 3 years with p = .01). As a result, the criteria for unacceptable “overall” treatment were revised to include prolonged elapsed treatment days. Further multivariate analyses showed the revised criteria identified patients with significantly poorer loco-regional control and absolute survival even after adjusting for other prognostic factors.

One hundred twenty-four eligible patients with advanced mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were entered into a pilot study of concomitant cisplatin (100 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks for three doses) and standard irradiation. The initial complete response (CR) was 71% with an additional two cases salvaged by surgery for an overall 73% CR. When no keratin was identified in the histologic specimen (41 patients) the CR was 90%. The nasopharynx showed the best CR (89%) among the sites. At 4 years after treatment, the estimated locoregional tumor control rate was 43% and the survival, 34%. When no keratin was present in the specimen, the estimated locoregional control of tumor was superior (56% versus 38% with keratin identified, P = 0.02) and the estimated survival was also superior (48% versus 26%, P = 0.008). Acute treatment-related toxicities included one death due to renal damage and two patients with life-threatening renal damage. The delivery of radiotherapy was not altered. Late toxicity included necrosis -3%, fibrosis -4%, and one fistula. The results of this study justify a randomized trial for the comparison of this combination of cisplatin and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in advanced mucosal carcinomas of the head and neck.

A phase Ilate/II trial of hyperfractionated (HFX) radiation therapy for non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCCL) was conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) between 1983 and 1987. Fractions of 1.2 Gy were administered twice daily with greater than or equal to 4 hours between fractions. Patients were randomized to receive minimum total doses of 60.0, 64.8, and 69.6 Gy. After acceptable risks of acute and late effects were found, 74.4 Gy and 79.2 Gy arms were added, and the lowest total dose arms were closed. No significant differences in the risks of acute or late effects in normal tissues were found among the 848 patients analyzed in the five arms; risks of severe or life-threatening pneumonitis were 2.6% for 60.0 to 64.8 Gy, 5.7% for 69.6 to 74.4 Gy, and 8.1% for 79.2 Gy. Among 350 patients who had the same criteria as Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocol 84-33 (American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging [AJCCS], 1984, stage III; Karnofsky performance status [KPS] 70 to 100; less than 6% weight loss), there was a dose response for survival: survival with 69.6 Gy (median, 13.0 months; 2 years, 29%) was significantly (P = .02) better than the lower total doses. There were no differences in survival among the three highest total-dose arms. Comparisons with results in similar patients treated with 60 Gy in 30 fractions of 2.0 Gy 5 days per week for 6 weeks suggest benefit from HFX radiation therapy with 69.6 Gy. Improvement in survival with HFX radiation therapy at 69.6 Gy total dose without increase in normal tissue effects, justifies phase III comparison with standard fractionation alone and combined with systemic chemotherapy in this common presentation of NSCCL.

The palliation of hepatic metastases represents a major therapeutic problem in oncology. The generally unfavorable prognosis of patients with liver metastasis may complicate the evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity of various therapeutic modalities. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) is evaluating new accelerated fractionation schemes for hepatic irradiation. In designing this study it became necessary to identify a favorable subpopulation of patients with an expected median survival of 6 months in whom the late effects of treatment could be evaluated. Data from two RTOG liver metastases studies (7605 and 8003) were analyzed using multi-variate techniques. Cases with a serum bilirubin level of greater than 1.5 mg%, performance score of less than 50, and gastric or pancreatic primary carcinomas were initially excluded because of the adverse influence of these factors on survival. One hundred and ninety cases met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis. A loglinear model was used to identify the patient characteristics associated with a favorable prognosis for survival. These included a performance score of 80–100, colorectal carcinoma primary, and no extrahepatic metastases. A logistic regression equation was derived and confirmed that the probability of surviving at least 6 months depended on the effects of performance score, primary site and the presence or absence of extra-hepatic metastases. Patients with all three favorable factors constituted 30% of the evaluable study population and had a predicted survival of 50% at 6 months. A patient population with these characteristics will be used to study the late effects of accelerated fractionated radiation therapy on the liver.

BACKGROUND. The objective of the current study was to examine whether emotional well-being predicted survival in a large sample of patients with head and neck cancer who were participating in multicenter clinical trials. METHODS. Participants were enrolled in 2 Radiation Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical trials (RTOG 9003 and RTOG 9111) and completed a baseline measure of quality of life (the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G]), which included an Emotional Well-Being subscale. The outcome measure was overall survival. Main statistical analyses included overall survival rates, which were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method with univariate comparisons analyzed using the log-rank test. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine whether emotional well-being had prognostic impact on survival after accounting for tumor-related and sociodemographic variables. Additional exploratory analyses examined possible subgroup effects. RESULTS. No statistically significant univariate or multivariate effects were observed for emotional well-being, and there were no effects limited to subgroups. These results stand in sharp contrast to the prognostic value of a variety of demographic and clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS. The current results add to the weight of the evidence that emotional functioning is not an independent predictor of survival in cancer patients. The study had the advantage of a large number of deaths to be explained in a sample with the uniformity of treatment and quality of care that is required in clinical trials. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.

Background Isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) is a synthetic vitamin A derivative, or retinoid, widely used in the treatment of cystic acne. Preclinical and clinical studies of high-dose isotretinoin in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) have produced encouraging results. We conducted a phase III randomized trial of low-dose isotretinoin versus placebo in early-stage HNSCC patients to assess its effect on second primary tumor incidence and survival. Methods We randomly assigned 1190 patients who had been treated for stage I or II HNSCC to receive either low-dose isotretinoin (30 mg/day) or placebo for 3 years. The patients were monitored for up to 4 more years. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for multivariable survival analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Isotretinoin did not statistically significantly reduce the rate of second primary tumors (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83 to 1.35) or increase survival (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.81 to 1.32) compared with placebo in patients with early-stage HNSCC. Current smokers had a higher rate of second primary tumors than that of never (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.08 to 2.50) or former (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.71) smokers. The hazard ratio of death from any cause for current smokers versus never smokers was 2.51 (95% CI = 1.54 to 4.10) and for current smokers versus former smokers was 1.60 (95% CI = 1.23 to 2.07). Major sites of second primary tumors (n = 261) included lung (31%), oral cavity (17%), larynx (8%), and pharynx (5%). Conclusions Low-dose isotretinoin was not effective in reducing the rate of second primary tumors or death or smoking-related disease. Smoking statistically significantly increased the rate of second primary tumors and death. Ongoing trials are testing higher doses of isotretinoin as part of combination bioadjuvant therapeutic methods for patients with locally advanced HNSCC.

BACKGROUND Multiple treatment guidelines and practice standards have been developed regarding the management of patients with breast carcinoma. Few evaluations of the penetration and utility of these practice standards have been performed. In 1992, the American College of Surgeons (ACOS), the American College of Radiology, the College of American Pathologists, and the Society of Surgical Oncology collaborated in establishing standards for breast-conservation treatment (BCT). The authors sought to determine whether practice patterns for patients with breast carcinoma who underwent BCT were consistent with these standards 2 years after their dissemination and to establish whether compliance varied by the same patient and hospital variables that predicted for the amount of BCT performed. METHODS A study specific questionnaire was circulated to cancer registrars through the Commission on Cancer of the ACOS asking them to submit reports on patients with Stage I and II breast carcinoma who were diagnosed in 1994. Eight hundred forty-two predominantly community hospitals throughout the United States responded, yielding a total of 16,643 analyzable patients. The frequency of compliance to the 1992 published practice standards for 7097 patients who received BCT was determined. The variation in compliance rates by patient age, race, and insurance status and the treating hospital's geographic locations and cancer programs were evaluated. RESULTS Of the 22 standards that were evaluated in the areas of preoperative mammography (2 standards), labeling of the surgical specimen (3 standards), pathology report content (10 standards), radiation after lumpectomy (6 standards), and systemic therapy for patients with positive lymph nodes (1 standard), treatment adherence was ≥ 80% for 16 standards (73%). Poor compliance was demonstrated for six standards: the documentation of an abnormality's size in the mammogram report, labeling the lumpectomy specimen with the affected quadrant of the breast, spatial orientation of the lumpectomy specimen and inclusion of lymphatic/vascular invasion, ductal carcinoma in situ, and macroscopic margin assessment in the pathology report. Variation in compliance to a standard occurred frequently across the type of hospital cancer program and geographic region (77% for both), and variation occurred less across the patient variables of age (32%), race (41%), and payer (23%). There was not a pattern of more frequent compliance among variables associated with more BCT use. CONCLUSIONS Large-scale evaluation of the penetration of treatment standards is feasible. For patients who underwent lumpectomy, practice appeared to be consistent (≥ 80% compliance), with 73% of 22 treatment standards evaluated. The standards with poor compliance represent areas for targeted physician education and reevaluation. Significant differences in adherence to a standard were seen frequently based on a hospital's geographic location and type of cancer program. This emphasizes the importance of adequate dissemination of treatment standards to ensure penetration into medical practices of all types.Cancer 2003;97:893–904. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11141

PURPOSE: To compare the local/regional control, survival, and toxicity of combined-modality therapy using high-dose (64.8 Gy) versus standard-dose (50.4 Gy) radiation therapy for the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 236 patients with clinical stage T1 to T4, N0/1, M0 squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma selected for a nonsurgical approach, after stratification by weight loss, primary tumor size, and histology, were randomized to receive combined-modality therapy consisting of four monthly cycles of fluorouracil (5-FU) (1,000 mg/m2/24 hours for 4 days) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 bolus day 1) with concurrent 64.8 Gy versus the same chemotherapy schedule but with concurrent 50.4 Gy. The trial was stopped after an interim analysis. The median follow-up was 16.4 months for all patients and 29.5 months for patients still alive. RESULTS: For the 218 eligible patients, there was no significant difference in median survival (13.0 v 18.1 months), 2-year survival (31% v 40%), or local/regional failure and local/regional persistence of disease (56% v 52%) between the high-dose and standard-dose arms. Although 11 treatment-related deaths occurred in the high-dose arm compared with two in the standard-dose arm, seven of the 11 deaths occurred in patients who had received 50.4 Gy or less. CONCLUSION: The higher radiation dose did not increase survival or local/regional control. Although there was a higher treatment-related mortality rate in the patients assigned to the high-dose radiation arm, it did not seem to be related to the higher radiation dose. The standard radiation dose for patients treated with concurrent 5-FU and cisplatin chemotherapy is 50.4 Gy.

Fibrolamellar hepatoma has a clinical course distinct from that of typical histologic hepatocellular carcinoma. The clinical behavior and prognostic features of nonresectable metastatic fibrolamellar hepatoma have not previously been fully addressed and are the focus of this report. Retrospective chart review of all patients (n = 17) with nonresectable metastatic fibrolamellar hepatoma referred to the Johns Hopkins Oncology Center from 1985 through 1990 was carried out. All patients had hepatic parenchymal involvement and regional node metastases at the time of referral. Metastases were limited to regional nodes in four patients. The remaining patients had lung metastases (n = 4), peritoneal metastases (n = 5), or both (n = 4). To assess the impact of the fibrolamellar variant, characteristic-matched control patients with typical histologic hepatocellular carcinoma were obtained from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group database. Actuarial median survival from treatment was 14 months in the patients with fibrolamellar hepatoma and 7.7 months in the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (p < 0.001). Karnofsky performance status and hepatic tumor volume at time of referral were important prognostic features. Multimodality treatment included radiation therapy and radiolabelled antibody, cisplatin-based chemotherapy, or both; results are discussed. Thirteen patients died, nine of liver failure, three of metastatic disease, and one of sepsis. Fibrolamellar histologic type, liver function tests, tumor volume, and patient performance status were significant predictors of survival. The cause of death in fibrolamellar hepatoma differs considerably from that observed in typical histologic hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. The techniques of treatment of this uncommon disease were modeled after advances in the multimodality treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and are discussed. Median survival was 14 months in patients with metastatic nonresectable fibrolamellar hepatoma.