Search

In the dynamic minimum set cover problem, the challenge is to minimize the update time while guaranteeing a close-to-optimal min\{ O(log n), f\} approximation factor. (Throughout, n, m, f, and C are parameters denoting the maximum number of elements, the number of sets, the frequency, and the cost range.) In the high-frequency range, when f = \Omega (log n), this was achieved by a deterministic O(log n)-approximation algorithm with O(f log n) amortized update time by Gupta et al. [Online and dynamic algorithms for set cover, in Proceedings STOC 2017, ACM, pp. 537--550]. In this paper we consider the low-frequency range, when f =O(log n), and obtain deterministic algorithms with a (1 + \epsilon)f-approximation ratio and the following guarantees on the update time. (1) O((f/\epsilon) \cdot log(Cn)) amortized update time: Prior to our work, the best approximation ratio guaranteed by deterministic algorithms was O(f2) of Bhattacharya, Henzinger, and Italiano [Design of dynamic algorithms via primal-dual method, in Proceedings ICALP 2015, Springer, pp. 206--218]. In contrast, the only result with O(f)-approximation was that of Abboud et al. [Dynamic set cover: Improved algorithms and lower bounds, in Proceedings STOC 2019, ACM, pp. 114--125], who designed a randomized (1+\epsilon)f-approximation algorithm with O((f2/\epsilon) \cdot log n) amortized update time. (2) O \bigl(f2/\epsilon 3 + (f/\epsilon 2) \cdot logC \bigr) amortized update time: This result improves the above update time bound for most values of f in the low-frequency range, i.e., f =o(log n). It is also the first result that is independent of m and n. It subsumes the constant amortized update time of Bhattacharya and Kulkarni [Deterministically maintaining a (2 + \epsilon)-approximate minimum vertex cover in O(1/\epsilon 2) amortized update time, in Proceedings SODA 2019, SIAM, pp. 1872--1885] for unweighted dynamic vertex cover (i.e., when f = 2 and C = 1). (3) O((f/\epsilon 3) \cdot log2(Cn)) worst-case update time: No nontrivial worst-case update time was previously known for the dynamic set cover problem. Our bound subsumes and improves by a logarithmic factor the O(log3 n/\sansp \sanso \sansl \sansy (\epsilon)) worst-case update time for the unweighted dynamic vertex cover problem (i.e., when f = 2 and C = 1) of Bhattacharya, Henzinger, and Nanongkai [Fully dynamic approximate maximum matching and minimum vertex cover in O(log3)n worst case update time, in Proceedings SODA 2017, SIAM, pp. 470--489]. We achieve our results via the primal-dual approach, by maintaining a fractional packing solution as a dual certificate. Prior work in dynamic algorithms that employs the primal-dual approach uses a local update scheme that maintains relaxed complementary slackness conditions for every set. For our first result we use instead a global update scheme that does not always maintain complementary slackness conditions. For our second result we combine the global and the local update schema. To achieve our third result we use a hierarchy of background schedulers. It is an interesting open question whether this background scheduler technique can also be used to transform algorithms with amortized running time bounds into algorithms with worst-case running time bounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigate offline and online algorithms for Round - UFPP , the problem of minimizing the number of rounds required to schedule a set of unsplittable flows of non-uniform size on a given path with heterogeneous edge capacities. Round - UFPP is known to be NP-hard and there are constant-factor approximation algorithms under the no bottleneck assumption (NBA), which stipulates that maximum size of any flow is at most the minimum global edge capacity. In this work, we present improved online and offline algorithms for Round - UFPP without the NBA. We first study offline Round - UFPP for a restricted class of instances, called α -small, where the size of each flow is at most α times the capacity of its bottleneck edge, and present an O (log (1 / (1 - α))) -approximation algorithm. Next, our main result is an online O (log log c max) -competitive algorithm for Round - UFPP where c max is the largest edge capacity, improving upon the previous best bound of O (log c max) due to Epstein et al. (SIAM J Discrete Math 23(2):822–841, 2009). These new results lead to an offline O (min (log n , log m , log log c max)) -approximation algorithm and an online O (min (log m , log log c max)) -competitive algorithm for Round - UFPP , where n is the number of flows and m is the number of edges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]