Search

Simple Summary: Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue and transplantation are the only available fertility techniques to preserve fertility and endocrine function for prepubertal girls with cancer who require immediate cancer treatment. The primary objective of this systematic review was to identify and critically appraise the existing evidence regarding targeted minimal infiltrative disease detection in harvested ovarian tissues and identify markers that may be of value for assessment before autotransplantation, thereby facilitating fertility restoration in childhood cancer survivors. While the majority of malignancies were found to be at low risk of containing malignant cells in ovarian tissue, more studies are needed to ensure safe implementation of future fertility restoration in clinical practice. Background: Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation are the only available fertility techniques for prepubertal girls with cancer. Though autotransplantation carries a risk of reintroducing malignant cells, it can be avoided by identifying minimal infiltrative disease (MID) within ovarian tissue. Methods: A broad search for peer-reviewed articles in the PubMed database was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines up to March 2023. Search terms included 'minimal residual disease', 'cryopreservation', 'ovarian', 'cancer' and synonyms. Results: Out of 542 identified records, 17 were included. Ovarian tissues of at least 115 girls were evaluated and categorized as: hematological malignancies (n = 56; 48.7%), solid tumors (n = 42; 36.5%) and tumors of the central nervous system (n = 17; 14.8%). In ovarian tissue of 25 patients (21.7%), MID was detected using RT-qPCR, FISH or multicolor flow cytometry: 16 of them (64%) being ALL (IgH rearrangements with/without TRG, BCL-ABL1, EA2-PBX1, TEL-AML1 fusion transcripts), 3 (12%) Ewing sarcoma (EWS-FLI1 fusion transcript, EWSR1 rearrangements), 3 (12%) CML (BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript, FLT3) and 3 (12%) AML (leukemia-associated immunophenotypes, BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript) patients. Conclusion: While the majority of malignancies were found to have a low risk of containing malignant cells in ovarian tissue, further studies are needed to ensure safe implementation of future fertility restoration in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Due to the significant increase in overall survival rates of childhood cancer, more awareness has been raised for the long-term consequences of treatment, including infertility. Currently, patients and their families are offered information regarding the risk of gonadal damage by paediatric oncologists and fertility counselling by fertility specialists regarding fertility preservation. However, the experiences of childhood cancer patients with oncofertility care are underreported. The available evidence reported in this review shows that female patients and survivors are variably satisfied with fertility information and report challenges in communication. They prefer to receive general information at diagnosis and detailed information later. Regrets are reported after refusal of fertility preservation. Patients and survivors are concerned about future children's health, effect on relationships and lack of control over fertility. With the results from this review, (international) standards for information for paediatric cancer patients and families may be developed to improve fertility information and counselling for current and future childhood cancer patients and survivors. Background: Childhood cancer patients and their families are increasingly offered oncofertility care including information regarding their risk of gonadal damage by paediatric oncologists, fertility counselling by fertility specialists and fertility preservation options. However, experiences regarding oncofertility care are underreported. We aimed to summarize the available evidence of experiences of female childhood cancer patients and survivors regarding oncofertility care. Methods: Manuscripts were systematically identified using the PubMed and Embase database. From, respectively, 1256 and 3857 manuscripts, 7 articles were included and assessed, including risk of bias assessment. Outcome measures included data describing experiences of female childhood cancer patients and survivors, regarding fertility information, counselling and/or preservation. Results: Female patients and survivors are variably satisfied with fertility information, report challenges in communication with healthcare professionals and prefer to receive general information at diagnosis and detailed fertility information later. Regrets after fertility counselling are underreported, but are associated with refusing fertility preservation. Lastly, regardless of counselling, female patients and survivors report fertility concerns about their future children's health and effect on relationships. Conclusion: Currently, the satisfaction with oncofertility care varies and female patients or survivors report regrets and concerns regardless of receiving fertility information or counselling. These results may help to improve the content of fertility information, communication skills of healthcare professionals and timing of counselling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]