Search

Plagiarism is when another author's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions are presented as one's own. Plagiarism is defined variously in educational settings depending on the institution. Plagiarism is regarded as a form of academic cheating. The main purpose of this paper is to analyze systems and discover the accuracy of systems for plagiarism, using documents of different sizes. It is critical to raise researcher knowledge of plagiarism of words, ideas, and graphics in order to avoid unethical writing methods. Updating author instructions and informing plagiarists of academic and other consequences of unethical behavior should be done by consulting linked papers. Most instances of redundant and "copy-and-paste" writing are said to be caused by a lack of innovative thinking and weak academic English skills. Plagiarism detection software mostly depends on text similarity reporting. Manual checks, on the other hand, are required to detect improper referencing, copyright breaches, and poor English writing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inpatient nursing documentation facilitates multi‐disciplinary team care and tracking of patient progress. In both high‐ and low‐ and middle‐income settings, it is largely paper‐based and may be used as a template for electronic medical records. However, there is limited evidence on how they have been developed. Objective: To synthesise evidence on how paper‐based nursing records have been developed and implemented in inpatient settings to support documentation of nursing care. Design: A scoping review guided by the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported using PRISMA‐ScR guidelines. Eligibility criteria: We included studies that described the process of designing paper‐based inpatient records and excluded those focussing on electronic records. Included studies were published in English up to October 2019. Sources of evidence: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane supplemented by free‐text searches on Google Scholar and snowballing the reference sections of included papers. Results: 12 studies met the eligibility criteria. We extracted data on study characteristics, the development process and outcomes related to documentation of inpatient care. Studies reviewed followed a process of problem identification, literature review, chart (re)design, piloting, implementation and evaluation but varied in their execution of each step. All studies except one reported a positive change in inpatient documentation or the adoption of charts amid various challenges. Conclusions: The approaches used seemed to work for each of the studies but could be strengthened by following a systematic process. Human‐centred Design provides a clear process that prioritises the healthcare professional's needs and their context to deliver a usable product. Problems with the chart could be addressed during the design phase rather than during implementation, thereby promoting chart ownership and uptake since users are involved throughout the design. This will translate to better documentation of inpatient care thus facilitating better patient tracking, improved team communication and better patient outcomes. Relevance to clinical practice: Paper‐based charts should be designed in a systematic and clear process that considers patient's and healthcare professional's needs contributing to improved uptake of charts and therefore better documentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, we present a framework for clustering Web search engine queries whose aim is to identify groups of queries used to search for similar information on the Web. The framework is based on a novel term vector model of queries that integrates user selections and the content of selected documents extracted from the logs of a search engine. The query representation obtained allows us to treat query clustering similarly to standard document clustering. We study the application of the clustering framework to two problems: relevance ranking boosting and query recommendation. Finally, we evaluate with experiments the effectiveness of our approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article announces of the improved service of Cells Tissues and Organs. It stated that the following issues Cells Tissues and Organs has increased the number of pages because of the excellent manuscripts. It notes that it has a policy of publishing so that the papers will be available online in final layout and citable format at a reasonable time. It stresses that the subsequent attribution of volume and page numbers has been delayed due to increased backlog of online-first papers.