Search

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based applications exhibit the potential to improve the quality and efficiency of patient care in different fields, including cataract management. A systematic review of the different applications of AI-based software on all aspects of a cataract patient's management, from diagnosis to follow-up, was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All selected articles were analyzed to assess the level of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 guidelines, and the quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Of the articles analyzed, 49 met the inclusion criteria. No data synthesis was possible for the heterogeneity of available data and the design of the available studies. The AI-driven diagnosis seemed to be comparable and, in selected cases, to even exceed the accuracy of experienced clinicians in classifying disease, supporting the operating room scheduling, and intraoperative and postoperative management of complications. Considering the heterogeneity of data analyzed, however, further randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of AI application in the management of cataract should be highly warranted. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Yacoub A Yousef,1 Mona Mohammad,1 Ibrahim AlNawaiseh,1 Reem AlJabari,1 Mario Damiano Toro,2,3 Almutez Gharaibeh,4 Robert Rejdak,5 Katarzyna Nowomiejska,5 Sandrine Zweifel,3 Teresio Avitabile,6 Magdalena Rejdak,6 Rashed Nazzal2 1Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman, Jordan; 2Faculty of Medical Sciences, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Warsaw, Poland; 3Department of Ophthalmology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland; 4School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; 5Department of General Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland; 6Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania, ItalyCorrespondence: Yacoub A YousefDepartment of Surgery (Ophthalmology), King Hussein Cancer Centre, Queen Rania St, Amman, 11941, JordanTel +96265355000Email yyousef@khcc.joMario Damiano ToroDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Zürich, Raemistrasse 100, Zürich, 8091, SwitzerlandTel +39 3495158220Email toro.mario@email.itPurpose: Ciliary body (CB) and iris thicknesses may change with certain eye diseases as well as between different populations. Here, we report Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Measurements (UBM) of the normal thickness for the CB and the iris from a homogenous population in the Middle East.Patients and Methods: Sonomed 35-MHz (SONOMED, INC. New York, USA) images were obtained at 4 radial meridians, and the thickness was measured at 3 locations along the radial length of the iris and at the thickest part of the CB. Parameters included mean thickness, median thickness, range, and standard deviation.Results: Of 46 adult patients, 83 normal eyes were included in this analysis. The overall mean, median iris thicknesses at the iris root, midway along the radial length of the iris, and at the juxtapupillary margin in mm were 0.42, 0.41 ± 0.08, 0.52, 0.51± 0.08, and 0.72, 0.71± 0.1, respectively. The overall mean, median thicknesses of the CB and CB + ciliary processes in mm were 0.72, 0.71 ± 0.1, and 1.42, 1.37 ± 0.2 respectively. Gender, age, side, and height had no impact on iris and/or CB thickness (p> 0.05). However, the iris thickness was significantly thicker in the superior quadrant than inferiorly, and in the nasal quadrant than the temporal quadrant (p=0.04), and the CB thickness and the CB + ciliary processes thickness were significantly thicker in the superior quadrant than inferiorly (P = 0.04 and 0.02 consecutively).Conclusion: We measured in this study the normal thickness of the CB and the iris in normal eyes from homogenous population in the Middle East using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Our findings are essential for the ophthalmic community worldwide and in the Middle East region and can be used as a normative thickness data for the iris and CB in healthy eyes.Keywords: ultrasound biomicroscopy, iris, ciliary body

Background: Active vitreous seeds in eyes with retinoblastoma (Rb) adversely affects the treatment outcome. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal melphalan chemotherapy (IViC) as a treatment for recurrent and refractory vitreous seeds in patients with Rb.Methods: We used a retrospective non-comparative study of patients with intraocular Rb who had vitreous seeds and were treated by IViC (20–30 μg of melphalan) using the safety-enhanced anti-reflux technique. Tumor response, ocular toxicity, demographics, clinical features, and survival were analyzed.Results: In total, 27 eyes were treated with 108 injections for recurrent (16 eyes) or refractory (11 eyes) vitreous seeds after failed systemic chemotherapy. A total of 15 (56%) were males, and 20 (74%) had bilateral disease. At diagnosis, the majority (n = 21) of the injected eyes were group D, and n = 6 were group C. Vitreous seeds showed complete regression in 21 (78%) eyes; 100% (n = 10) for eyes with focal seeds; 65% (n = 11/17 eyes) for eyes with diffuse seeds (p = 0.04); 7 (64%) eyes with refractory seeds; and 14 (87%) eyes with recurrent seeds showed complete response (p = 0.37). In total, 16 (59%) eyes developed side effects: retinal toxicity (48%), pupillary synechiae (15%), cataracts (30%), iris atrophy (7%), and retinal and optic atrophy (4%). Only one child was lost to follow-up whose family refused enucleation and none developed orbital tumor recurrence or distant metastasis.Conclusion: IViC with melphalan is effective (more for focal than diffuse seeding) and a relatively safe treatment modality for Rb that can improve the outcomes of eye salvage procedures. However, unexpected toxicity can occur even with the standard dose of 20–30 μg.