Search

Multispectral light detection and ranging (LiDAR) instruments, such as Optech Titan, record intensities at multiple wavelengths and these intensities can be used for tree species prediction in the same way as multispectral image data. In this paper, our main objective was to compare the accuracy of tree species prediction in a boreal forest area using multispectral LiDAR, the 1064-nm wavelength channel (“unispectral LiDAR”), and unispectral LiDAR with auxiliary aerial image data. We also evaluated the effect of the widely used intensity range correction method. We classified the main tree species of field plots using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and predicted the species-specific volume proportions (%) for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), Norway spruce (Picea abies), and broadleaved trees using the $k$ -nearest neighbor imputation. The effect of intensity correction on prediction errors for the dominant tree species was evaluated using optimal parameters derived from: 1) minimal intensity difference between flight lines; 2) parameters suggested by theory; and 3) uncorrected data. Although the range correction increased the classification accuracy slightly, it was observed to be ambiguous, and not consistent with theory for canopy echoes. Regardless, the intensity values were useful for the prediction of dominant tree species and species’ volume proportions. The results for the dominant tree species classification using multispectral LiDAR [overall accuracy (OA) 88.2%, kappa 0.79] were comparable to the use of unispectral LiDAR and aerial images (OA 89.1%, kappa 0.81). We conclude that the multispectral LiDAR may become a useful tool in operational species-specific forest inventories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stem biomass is a fundamental component of the global carbon cycle that is essential for forest productivity estimation. Over the last few decades, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) has proven to be a useful tool for accurate carbon stock and biomass estimation in various biomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of multispectral LiDAR data for the reliable estimation of single-tree total and barkless stem biomass (TSB and BSB) in an uneven-aged structured forest with complex topography. Destructive and non-destructive field measurements were collected for a total of 67 dominant and co-dominant Abies borisii-regis trees located in a mountainous area in Greece. Subsequently, two allometric equations were constructed to enrich the reference data with non-destructively sampled trees. Five different regression algorithms were tested for single-tree BSB and TSB estimation using height (height percentiles and bicentiles, max and average height) and intensity (skewness, standard deviation and average intensity) LiDAR-derived metrics: Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), Gaussian Process (GP), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The results showcased that the RF algorithm provided the best overall predictive performance in both BSB (i.e., RMSE = 175.76 kg and R2 = 0.78) and TSB (i.e., RMSE = 211.16 kg and R2 = 0.65) cases. Our work demonstrates that BSB can be estimated with moderate to high accuracy using all the tested algorithms, contrary to the TSB, where only three algorithms (RF, SVR and GP) can adequately provide accurate TSB predictions due to bark irregularities along the stems. Overall, the multispectral LiDAR data provide accurate stem biomass estimates, the general applicability of which should be further tested in different biomes and ecosystems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Forest Research is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract: Remote sensing of forest canopy cover has been widely studied recently, but little attention has been paid to the quality of field validation data. Ecological literature has two different coverage metrics. Vertical canopy cover (VCC) is the vertical projection of tree crowns ignoring within-crown gaps. Angular canopy closure (ACC) is the proportion of covered sky at some angular range around the zenith, and can be measured with a field-of-view instrument, such as a camera. We compared field-measured VCC and ACC at 15° and 75° from the zenith to different LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) metrics, using several LiDAR data sets and comprehensive field data. The VCC was estimated to a high precision using a simple proportion of canopy points in first-return data. Confining to a maximum 15° scan zenith angle, the absolute root mean squared error (RMSE) was 3.7–7.0%, with an overestimation of 3.1–4.6%. We showed that grid-based methods are capable of reducing the inherent overestimation of VCC. The low scan angles and low power settings that are typically applied in topographic LiDARs are not suitable for ACC estimation as they measure in wrong geometry and cannot easily detect small within-crown gaps. However, ACC at 0–15° zenith angles could be estimated from LiDAR data with sufficient precision, using also the last returns (RMSE 8.1–11.3%, bias –6.1–+4.6%). The dependency of LiDAR metrics and ACC at 0–75° zenith angles was nonlinear and was modeled from laser pulse proportions with nonlinear regression with a best-case standard error of 4.1%. We also estimated leaf area index from the LiDAR metrics with linear regression with a standard error of 0.38. The results show that correlations between airborne laser metrics and different canopy field characteristics are very high if the field measurements are done with equivalent accuracy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Surface fuel load (SFL) constitutes one of the most significant fuel components and is used as an input variable in most fire behavior prediction systems. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential of discrete-return multispectral Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data to reliably predict SFL in a coniferous forest characterized by dense overstory and complex terrain. In particular, a linear regression analysis workflow was employed with the separate and combined use of LiDAR-derived structural and pulse intensity information for the load estimation of the total surface fuels and individual surface fuel types. Following a leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) approach, the models developed from the different sets of predictor variables were compared in terms of their estimation accuracy. LOOCV indicated that the predictive models produced by the combined use of structural and intensity metrics significantly outperformed the models constructed with the individual sets of metrics, exhibiting an explained variance (R2) between 0.59 and 0.71 (relative Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) 19.3–37.6%). Overall, the results of this research showcase that both structural and intensity variables provided by multispectral LiDAR data are significant for surface fuel load estimation and can successfully contribute to effective pre-fire management, including fire risk assessment and behavior prediction in case of a fire event. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) information alone is insufficient for species-specific prediction of forest stand attributes, and therefore auxiliary optical image features (OIF) are commonly used to decrease the prediction errors associated with species-specific tree attributes. However, this requires collection and merging of two data sources, LiDAR and OIF, which increases the costs of the inventory. The recently introduced multispectral LiDAR (M-ALS) provides a potential single-sensor solution for obtaining species-specific information, as its multispectral intensity values resemble optical image data. Image point clouds (IPC) derived from aerial stereo images are another single-sensor option that provides both geometric and optical information. We compared two single-sensor options, M-ALS and IPC, with two LiDAR data sets (leaf-on and leaf-off) with auxiliary OIF, for the prediction of boreal tree species' volumes. In terms of root-mean-square error (RMSE) in the validation data, the LiDAR+OIF combination performed best (leaf-on RMSE: 33.3%; leaf-off RMSE 34.3%), followed by M-ALS + OIF (RMSE = 35.2%) and IPC + OIF (RMSE = 42.4%). The mean RMSE value associated with M-ALS increased to the same level (44.7%) as the IPC + OIF combination when optical image features were not included. Both IPC and M-ALS are potential single sensor solutions for forest inventories, but the use of both LiDAR and OIF provides the most accurate results. • Species-specific volumes predicted with multiple sensor configurations. • LiDAR with optical image features performed better than multispectral LiDAR alone. • IPC data performed markedly worse than LiDAR data in predicting total volume. • Single wavelength leaf-on LiDAR with image features performed the best. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]