1. Methodology for Regional Soil Organic Matter Prediction with Spectroscopy: Optimal Sample Grouping, Input Variables, and Prediction Model.
- Author
-
Zhang, Xinle, Dong, Chang, Liu, Huanjun, Meng, Xiangtian, Luo, Chong, Han, Yongqi, and Ai, Hongfu
- Subjects
CONVOLUTIONAL neural networks ,PREDICTION models ,STANDARD deviations ,ORGANIC compounds - Abstract
Soil organic matter (SOM) is an essential component of soil and is crucial for increasing agricultural production and soil fertility. The combination of hyperspectral remote sensing and deep learning can be used to predict the SOM content efficiently, rapidly, and cost-effectively on various scales. However, determining the optimal groups, inputs, and models for reducing the spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in large regions and to improve the accuracy of SOM prediction remains a challenge. Hyperspectral reflectance data from 1477 surface soil samples in Northeast China were utilized to evaluate three grouping methods (no groups (NG), traditional grouping (TG), and spectral grouping (SG)) and four inputs (raw reflectance (RR), continuum removal (CR), fractional-order differentiation (FOD), and spectral characteristic parameters (SCPs)). The SOM prediction accuracies of random forest (RF), convolutional neural network (CNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) models were assessed. The results were as follows: (1) The highest accuracy was achieved using SG, SCPs, and the LSTM model, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.82 and a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.69%. (2) The LSTM model exhibited the highest accuracy in SOM prediction (R2 = 0.82, RMSE = 0.89%), followed by the CNN model (R2 = 0.72, RMSE = 0.85%) and the RF model (R2 = 0.69, RMSE = 0.91%). (3) The SG provided higher SOM prediction accuracy than TG and NG. (4) The SCP-based prediction results were significantly better than those of the other inputs. The R2 of the SCP-based model was 0.27 higher and the RMSE was 0.40% lower than that of the RR-based model with NG. In addition, the LSTM model had higher prediction errors at low (0–2%) and high (8–10%) SOM contents, whereas the error was minimal at intermediate SOM contents (2–8%). The study results provide guidance for selecting grouping methods and approaches to improve the prediction accuracy of the SOM content and reduce the spatial heterogeneity of the SOM content in large regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF