1. A comparison of paper-and-pencil and computerized forms of Line Orientation and Enhanced Cued Recall Tests.
- Author
-
Aşkar P, Altun A, Cangöz B, Cevik V, Kaya G, and Türksoy H
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Paper, Problem Solving, Psychometrics statistics & numerical data, Reproducibility of Results, Statistics as Topic, Young Adult, Cues, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted statistics & numerical data, Mental Recall, Neuropsychological Tests statistics & numerical data, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual
- Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess whether a computerized battery of neuropsychological tests could produce similar results as the conventional forms. Comparisons on 77 volunteer undergraduates were carried out with two neuropsychological tests: Line Orientation Test and Enhanced Cued Recall Test. Firstly, students were assigned randomly across the test medium (paper-and-pencil versus computerized). Secondly, the groups were given the same test in the other medium after a 30-day interval between tests. Results showed that the Enhanced Cued Recall Test-Computer-based did not correlate with the Enhanced Cued Recall Test-Paper-and-pencil results. Line Orientation Test-Computer-based scores, on the other hand, did correlate significantly with the Line Orientation Test-Paper-and-pencil version. In both tests, scores were higher on paper-and-pencil tests compared to computer-based tests. Total score difference between modalities was statistically significant for both Enhanced Cued Recall Tests and for the Line Orientation Test. In both computer-based tests, it took less time for participants to complete the tests.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF