Search

Background: The incidence of various open shoulder procedures has changed over time. In addition, various fellowships provide overlapping training in open shoulder surgery. There is a lack of information regarding the relationship between surgeon training and open shoulder procedure type and incidence in early career orthopedic surgeons., Methods: The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part-II database was queried from 2002 to 2016 for reported open shoulder procedures. The procedures were categorized as follows: arthroplasty, revision arthroplasty, open instability, trauma, and open rotator cuff. We evaluated procedure trends as well as their relationship to surgeon fellowship categorized by Sports, Shoulder/Elbow, Hand, Trauma, and "Other" fellowship as well as no fellowship training. We additionally evaluated complication data as it related to procedure, fellowship category, and volume., Results: Over the 2002-2016 study period, there were increasing cases of arthroplasty, revision arthroplasty, and trauma (P < .001). There were decreasing cases in open instability and open rotator cuff (P < .001). Those with Sports training reported the largest overall share of open shoulder cases. Those with Shoulder/Elbow training reported an increasing overall share of arthroplasty cases and higher per candidate case numbers. The percentage of early career orthopedic surgeons reporting 5 or more arthroplasty cases was highest among Shoulder/Elbow candidates (P < .001). Across all procedures, those without fellowship training were least likely to report a complication (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.86; P < .001). Shoulder/Elbow candidates were least likely to report an arthroplasty complication (OR, 0.84, P = .03) as was any surgeon reporting 5 or more arthroplasty cases (OR, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.94; P = .006)., Conclusion: The type and incidence of open shoulder surgery procedures continues to change. Among early career surgeons, those with more specific shoulder training are now performing the majority of arthroplasty-related procedures, and early career volume inversely correlates with complications., (Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate rates, trends, and complications for carpal tunnel release (CTR) related to fellowship training using the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Database., Methods: We searched the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome who underwent either open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) or endoscopic (ECTR) from 2003 to 2013. Cases with multiple treatment codes were excluded. Data were gathered on geographic location, fellowship, and surgical outcomes. Data were then divided into 2 cohorts: hand fellowship trained versus non-hand fellowship trained. We performed analysis with chi-square tests of independence and for trend., Results: Overall, 12.4% of all CTRs were done endoscopically. Hand fellowship-trained orthopedists performed about 4.5 times the number of ECTR than did non-hand fellowship-trained surgeons. An increasing trend over time of ECTR was seen only among the hand fellowship cohort. The northwest region of the United States had the highest incidence (23.1%) of ECTR, and the Southwest the lowest incidence (5.9%). The complication incidence associated with CTR overall was 3.6%, without a significant difference between ECTR and OCTR. Within the hand fellowship cohort the complication incidence for ECTR was significantly less than for OCTR. There was no difference in overall complication rates with ECTR and OCTR between the 2 cohorts. Wound complications were higher with OCTR (1.2% vs 0.25%) and nerve palsy with ECTR (0.66% vs 0.27%); with postoperative pain equivalent between techniques independent of fellowship training., Conclusions: Within the United States from 2003 to 2013, the rate of ECTR increased, as did complications. However, complication rates remained low in the first 2 years of practice. Hand fellowship-trained surgeons performed more ECTR than did non-hand fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons, and both groups had similar complication rates., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) introduces several diagnostic and technical challenges in comparison with primary ACL reconstruction. With the increasing numbers of original reconstructions combined with the continued expectation of high-level athletic participation, revision ACL reconstruction is likely to become more frequent. The purpose of this article was to summarize the causes of failure and the evaluation of the patient with recurrent instability. A review of the literature regarding results after revision ACL reconstruction was performed to assist in the decision-making process and patient counseling. Good results can be obtained in terms of functional stability after revision reconstruction, but chondral and meniscal injury as well as unrecognized associated pathologic instability may play a role in diminished outcomes. In addition, a wide variety of surgical techniques are reviewed to address problems associated with tunnel malposition, widening, and pre-existing hardware.