Search

Background: Telemedicine, or telehealth, is broadly defined as the use of technology to deliver health care or health education at distance. Synchronous communication telemedicine, which involves the use of real time audio and video between patient and provider, is a developing field and its use in the pediatric orthopaedic population is not well defined. To better understand the existing use of and challenges posed by telemedicine for pediatric orthopaedic providers, the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) practice management committee conducted a survey of current POSNA members., Methods: A 33-question survey was created by the POSNA Practice Management Committee, piloted among committee members and approved by the POSNA Evidence Based Practice Committee. A total of 167 responses were complete (75% complete response rate). Telemedicine use questions referred to the use of synchronous communication telemedicine., Results: A total of 50% reported being "moderately" or "not really" familiar with telemedicine. Sixty percent of study participants reported their hospital systems utilize telemedicine; however, only 40% reported utilizing telemedicine in their own practice. Sixty-seven percent indicated interest in telemedicine training. Telemedicine was utilized for a variety of patient pathology and visit types 57% of study participants did not bill for telemedicine services. Sixty-three percent were unaware of their states' billing rules regarding telemedicine., Conclusion: The survey is an attempt to understand the current landscape of telemedicine use within pediatric orthopaedics. Currently, a minority of survey participants utilize synchronous communication telemedicine. There is a desire for telemedicine training and best billing practices education. Further study to evaluate the limitations and efficacy of telemedicine in the pediatric orthopaedic population will be necessary as its use increases., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Electronic medical record (EMR) use among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons has evolved substantially within the past decade. In response to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, large hospitals and tertiary pediatric medical centers rapidly acquired and implemented EMRs with uncertainty as to the potential impact on patient care and operational efficiency of subspecialists. This study reviews the background and regulatory framework for Meaningful Use of EMR and assesses the current landscape of EMR utilization by pediatric orthopaedic surgeons., Methods: In 2015, the Practice Management Committee distributed a survey regarding EMR use and satisfaction to members of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. Survey responses from 324 members were used to analyze levels of satisfaction by EMR platform and practice type and to consider drivers of satisfaction or dissatisfaction of end users., Results: Although there were no differences in overall satisfaction based on vendor or practice type, significant differences were noted for 5 specific parameters of satisfaction, including: usefulness of templates, efficiency of practice workflow, information services support, number of logon events, and speed of the system. A user/vendor map is provided to facilitate networking among providers and groups utilizing common EMR platforms to help bring about rational improvements in EMR functionality for the future., Conclusions: Substantial effort needs to be made to improve subspecialty-specific EMR documentation, order entry, research tools, and clinical workflows to enhance the processes of care for children with orthopaedic conditions in the era of EMR., Level of Evidence: Level IV.

The application of viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs) (e.g., thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)) in orthopedics is in its relative infancy when compared with other surgical fields. Fortunately, several recent studies describe the emerging use of VHAs to quickly and reliably analyze the real-time coagulation and fibrinolytic status in both orthopedic trauma and elective orthopedic surgery. Trauma-induced coagulopathy—a spectrum of abnormal coagulation phenotypes including clotting factor depletion, inadequate thrombin generation, platelet dysfunction, and dysregulated fibrinolysis—remains a potentially fatal complication in severely injured and/or hemorrhaging patients whose timely diagnosis and management are aided by the use of VHAs. Furthermore, VHAs are an invaluable compliment to common coagulation tests by facilitating the detection of hypercoagulable states commonly associated with orthopedic injury and postoperative status. The use of VHAs to identify hypercoagulability allows for an accurate venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment and monitoring of VTE prophylaxis. Until now, the data have been insufficient to permit an individualized approach with regard to dosing and duration for VTE thromboprophylaxis. By incorporating VHAs into routine practice, orthopedic surgeons will be better equipped to diagnose and treat the complete spectrum of coagulation abnormalities faced by orthopedic patients. This work serves as an educational primer and up-to-date review of the current literature on the use of VHAs in orthopedic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Five billion people, primarily in low-income and middle-income countries, cannot access safe, affordable surgical and anesthesia care, particularly for orthopaedic trauma. The rate-limiting step for many orthopaedic surgical procedures performed in the developing world is the absence of safe anesthesia. Even surgical mission teams providing surgical care are limited by the availability of anesthesiologists. Emergency physicians, who are already knowledgeable in airway management and procedural sedation, may be able to help to fulfill the need for anesthetists in disaster relief and surgical missions.Methods: Following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, an emergency physician was trained using the Emergency Physician's General Anesthesia Syllabus (EP GAS) to perform duties similar to those of certified registered nurse anesthetists. The emergency physician then provided anesthesia during surgical mission trips with an orthopaedic team from February 2011 to March 2017, in Milot, Haiti. This is a descriptive overview of this training program and prospectively collected data on the cohort of patients whom the surgical mission teams treated in Haiti during that time frame.Results: A single emergency physician anesthetist provided anesthesia for 71 of the 172 orthopaedic surgical cases, nearly doubling the number of cases that could be performed. This also allowed the anesthesiologists to focus on pediatric and more difficult cases. Both immediately after the surgical procedure and at 1 year, there were no serious adverse events for cases in which the emergency physician provided anesthesia.Conclusions: Given emergency physicians' baseline training in airway management and sedation, well-supervised and focused extra training under the vigilant supervision of a board-certified anesthesiologist may allow emergency physicians to be able to safely administer anesthesia. Using emergency physicians as anesthetists in this closely supervised setting could increase the number of surgical cases that can be performed in a disaster setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]