Search

The elderly have conventionally been defined as individuals over the age of 65 and are projected to represent about 21% of the United States (US) population by the year 2030. Distal radius fractures (DRF) in particular are one of the most common fractures among elderly patients and their incidence continues to rise in part due to increased activity levels among the elderly, increased life expectancy, rising rates of obesity, changes to dietary habits, and the prevalence of osteoporosis. Although various treatment options exist for these injuries, nonsurgical treatment of distal radius fractures remains a mainstay among elderly patients with mounting evidence of its non-inferiority to surgical fixation in the literature. Here, we summarize the overall approach to nonsurgical treatment of distal radius fractures in the elderly population while examining its supporting data and highlighting potential risks and limitations to it.

SUMMARY Distal radius fractures are common in the geriatric population; however, treatment of these fractures remains controversial. Patients undergoing operative fixation may experience a quicker recovery with increased grip strength, which is beneficial in the active geriatric patient. Treatment options include fragment-specific fixation, volar locked plating, and dorsal bridge plating. External fixation alone leads to poor outcomes and is indicated in patients with soft tissue compromise or as a supplemental aid. Implant selection should be tailored to fracture parameters. With a thoughtful surgical algorithm and rehabilitation protocol, good outcomes can be achieved with a high rate of patient satisfaction.

Background: Recent studies have reported that targeting a center-center position at the distal tibia during intramedullary nailing (IMN) may result in malalignment. Although not fully understood, this observation suggests that the coronal anatomic center of the tibia may not correspond to the center of the distal tibia articular surface. Questions/Purposes: To identify the coronal anatomic axis of the distal tibia that corresponds to an ideal start site for IMN placement utilizing intact cadaveric tibiae. Methods: IMN placement was performed in 9 fresh frozen cadaveric tibiae. A guidewire was used to identify the ideal start site in the proximal tibia and an opening reamer allowed access to the canal. Each nail was then advanced without the use of a reaming rod until exiting the distal tibia plafond. Cadaveric and radiographic measurements were performed to determine the center of the nail exit site in the coronal plane. Results: Cadaveric and radiographic measurements identified the IMN exit site to correspond with the lateral 59.5% and 60.4% of the plafond, respectively. Conclusions: Tibial nails inserted using an ideal start site have an endpoint that corresponds roughly to the junction of the lateral and middle third of the plafond. Further studies are warranted to better understand the impact of IMN endpoint placement on the functional and radiographic outcomes of tibia shaft fractures.

SUMMARY Treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures remains challenging due to assuring adequate distal fixation. Traditional treatment options include lateral locked plating and retrograde nailing, although recently dual implant constructs have been explored with promising results. Allowing immediate weight-bearing in this patient population has benefits with regards to rehabilitation and outcome. Recent literature has focused on nail-plate constructs, however plate-plate constructs are preferred at our institution as they do not require arthroplasty component compatibility, facilitate the coronal plane reduction, and allow for immediate weight-bearing.

SUMMARY Distal femur fractures in the elderly have been historically treated with locked plating or retrograde intramedullary nailing with good, reliable results. However, in certain more complex fracture patterns (native or periprosthetic), increased density of fixation via dual-plate or nail plate combination can help achieve immediate weight-bearing. It can also potentially increase rates of union by shifting and maintaining the neutral axis, distributing forces more evenly across the fracture site. Here, we discuss the indications, pros and cons of both dual-plate and nail plate combination techniques in a concise case-based format.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic performance of perfusion pressure (PP) thresholds for fasciotomy. DESIGN Prospective observational study. SETTING Seven Level-1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS One hundred fifty adults with severe leg injuries and ≥2 hours of continuous PP data who had been enrolled in a multicenter observational trial designed to develop a clinical prediction rule for acute compartment syndrome (ACS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS For each patient, a given PP criterion was positive if it was below the specified threshold for at least 2 consecutive hours. The diagnostic performance of PP thresholds between 10 and 30 mm Hg was determined using 2 reference standards for comparison: (1) the likelihood of ACS as determined by an expert panel who reviewed each patient's data portfolio or (2) whether the patient underwent fasciotomy. RESULTS Using the likelihood of ACS as the diagnostic standard (ACS considered present if median likelihood ≥70%, absent if

To compare the retrospective decision of an expert panel who assessed likelihood of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) in a patient with a high-risk tibia fracture with decision to perform fasciotomy.Prospective observational study.Seven Level 1 trauma centers.One hundred eighty-two adults with severe tibia fractures.Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and receiver-operator curve) of an expert panel's assessment of likelihood ACS compared with fasciotomy as the reference diagnostic standard.The interrater reliability of the expert panel as measured by the Krippendorff alpha. Expert panel consensus was determined using the percent of panelists in the majority group of low (expert panel likelihood of ≤0.3), uncertain (0.3-0.7), or high (0.7) likelihood of ACS.Comparing fasciotomy (the diagnostic standard) and the expert panel's assessment as the diagnostic classification (test), the expert panel's determination of uncertain or high likelihood of ACS (threshold0.3) had a sensitivity of 0.90 (0.70, 0.99), specificity of 0.95 (0.90, 0.98), PPV of 0.70 (0.50, 0.86), and NPV of 0.99 (0.95, 1.00). When a threshold of0.7 was set as a positive diagnosis, the expert panel assessment had a sensitivity of 0.67 (0.43, 0.85), specificity of 0.98 (0.95, 1.00), PPV of 0.82 (0.57, 0.96), and NPV of 0.96 (0.91, 0.98).In our study, the retrospective assessment of an expert panel of the likelihood of ACS has good specificity and excellent NPV for fasciotomy, but only low-to-moderate sensitivity and PPV. The discordance between the expert panel-assessed likelihood of ACS and the decision to perform fasciotomy suggests that concern regarding potential diagnostic bias in studies of ACS is warranted.Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Treatment of periprosthetic fractures above total knee arthroplasty remains challenging because of assessment of implant stability and the short segment of often osteoporotic bone available for distal fixation. Fractures with significant medial comminution should undergo retrograde intramedullary nailing or dual-implant fixation, as isolated lateral locked plating is not indicated. There are a multitude of objective and subjective factors incorporated into the decision to proceed with retrograde nailing including assessment of the patient's functional status, fracture morphology, implant stability, and compatibility of the prosthesis with retrograde nailing. Here, we review the steps to success in using retrograde intramedullary nailing in the treatment of specific periprosthetic fractures about total knee arthroplasty.

Objectives To report on our results using a proximal femoral locking plate for the treatment of peritrochanteric femur fractures. Design Retrospective study. Setting Level I Academic Medical Center. Patients Sixty-eight patients with 68 fractures. Intervention Demographics, fracture morphology, preoperative imaging, rationale against nailing, and outcomes were collected. Main outcome measurements Outcomes were grouped into no complication, minor complication, or major complication. Minor complications included healed fractures with implant failure or change in alignment from immediate postoperative radiographs, which did not require intervention or elective implant removal. Major complications included any case that required revision for nonunion or implant failure. Results Nine patients were lost to follow-up. Of the 59 fractures, 16 had complications (27%): 9 minor and 7 major. Active tobacco use (P = 0.020) and fractures with an associated intracapsular femoral neck component (P = 0.006) correlated with complications. Conclusions Proximal femoral locking plates continue to be associated with a high complication rate. However, based on our experience, proximal femoral locking plates may be considered in highly selected cases when absolutely no other implant is deemed appropriate, based on the degree of comminution and the complexity of the fracture pattern. Patients must be informed about the possibility of revision surgery based on the inherent limitations of these devices. Level of evidence Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Femoral neck fractures in the physiologically young patient are challenging injuries to manage. A tenuous blood supply and the intrasynovial nature of the fracture create a challenging biological environment. To make matters worse, the biomechanics are equally problematic. Frequently, these fractures in younger populations are high Pauwel angle fractures that see considerable force, especially shear. These factors combine to make nonunion and avascular necrosis all too common. In the current study, we will highlight the challenges inherent to managing these injuries and will discuss techniques and implants that may help mitigate some of these challenges.

OBJECTIVES To compare the efficiency, radiation exposure to surgeon and patient, and accuracy of C-arm versus O-arm with navigation in the placement of transiliac-transsacral and iliosacral screws by an orthopaedic trauma fellow, for a surgeon early in practice. METHODS Twelve fresh frozen cadavers were obtained. Preoperative computed tomography scans were reviewed to assess for safe corridors in the S1 and S2 segments. Iliosacral screws were assigned to the S1 segment in dysmorphic pelvises. Screws were randomized to modality and laterality. An orthopaedic trauma fellow placed all screws. Time of procedure and radiation exposure to the cadaver and surgeon were recorded. Three fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons rated the safety of each screw on postoperative computed tomography scan. RESULTS Six normal and 6 dysmorphic pelvises were identified. Eighteen transiliac-transsacral screws and 6 iliosacral screws were distributed evenly between C-arm and O-arm. Average operative duration per screw was significantly shorter using C-arm compared with O-arm (15.7 minutes ± 6.1 vs. 23.7 ± 8.5, P = 0.014). Screw placement with C-arm exposed the surgeon to a significantly greater amount of radiation (3.87 × 10 rads vs. 0.32 × 10, P < 0.001) while O-arm exposed the cadaver to a significantly greater amount of radiation (0.03 vs. 2.76 rads, P < 0.001). Two S2 transiliac-transsacral screws (1 C-arm and 1 O-arm) were categorized as unsafe based on scoring. There was no difference in screw accuracy between modalities. CONCLUSIONS A difference in accuracy between modalities could not be elucidated, whereas efficiency was improved with utilization of C-arm, with statistical significance. A statistically significant increase in radiation exposure to the surgeon using C-arm was found, which may be clinically significant over a career. The results of this study can be extrapolated to a fellow or surgeon early in practice. The decision between use of these modalities will vary depending on surgeon preference and hospital resources.

We recorded measurements of muscle perfusion using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and intramuscular pressure (IMP) in a study designed to develop a decision rule for predicting acute compartment syndrome (ACS). The purpose of this study was to report our experience measuring NIRS data in the context of this broader investigation and to explore factors related to variations in data capture.One hundred and eighty-five patients with lower-leg injuries had data consisting of continuous NIRS measurement of the O2 saturation in the anterior compartment of the injured limb and the contralateral (control) limb, and continuous IMP recording in the anterior and deep posterior compartments of the injured leg as part of their participation in an institutional review board-approved multicenter trial. All monitoring was done for a prescribed period of time. For both types of data, the percentage of valid data capture was defined as the ratio of the minutes of observed data points within a physiological range to the total minutes of expected data points. Clinically useful NIRS data required simultaneous data from the injured and control limbs to calculate the ratio. Statistical tests were used to compare the 2 methods as well as factors associated with the percent of valid NIRS data capture.For the original cohort, clinically useful NIRS data were available a median of 9.1% of the expected time, while IMP data were captured a median of 87.6% of the expected time (p0.001). Excluding 46 patients who had erroneous NIRS data recorded, the median percentage was 31.6% for NIRS compared with 87.4% for IMP data (p0.00001). Fractures with an associated hematoma were less likely to have valid data points (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; p = 0.04). Gustilo types-I and II open fractures were more likely than Tscherne grades C0 and C1 closed fractures to have valid data points (OR, 1.97; p = 0.03).In this study, NIRS data were not collected reliably. In contrast, IMP measurements were collected during85% of the expected monitoring period. These data raise questions about the utility of current NIRS data capture technology for monitoring oxygenation in patients at risk of ACS.

The impact of the Trauma Collaborative Care (TCC) program on surgeon confidence in managing the psychosocial sequelae of orthopaedic trauma was evaluated as part of a larger prospective, multisite, cluster clinical trial. We compared confidence and perceived resource availability among surgeons practicing in trauma centers that implemented the TCC program with orthopaedic trauma surgeons in similar trauma centers that did not implement the TCC.Prospective cohort design.Level-I trauma centers.Attending surgeons and fellows (N = 95 Pre and N = 82 Post).Self-report 10-item measure of surgeon confidence in managing psychosocial issues associated with trauma and perceived availability of support resources.Analyses, performed on the entire sample and repeated on the subset of 52 surgeons who responded to the survey at both times points, found surgeons at intervention sites experienced a significantly greater positive improvement (P0.05) in their (1) belief that they have strategies to help orthopaedic trauma patients change their psychosocial situation; (2) confidence in making appropriate referrals for orthopaedic trauma patients with psychosocial problems; and (3) belief that they have access to information to guide the management of psychosocial issues related to recovery.Initial data suggest that the establishment of the TCC program can improve surgeons' perceived availability of resources and their confidence in managing the psychosocial sequelae after injury. Further studies will be required to determine if this translates into beneficial patient effects.Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The optimal technique for a transtibial amputation in a young, active, and healthy patient is controversial. Proponents of the Ertl procedure (in which the cut ends of the tibia and fibula are joined with a bone bridge synostosis) argue that the residual limb is more stable which confers better prosthetic fit and improved function especially among high-performing individuals. At the same time, the Ertl procedure is associated with longer operative and healing time and may be associated with a higher complication rate compared with the standard Burgess procedure. The TAOS is a prospective, multicenter randomized trial comparing 18-month outcomes after transtibial amputation using the Ertl versus Burgess approach among adults aged 18 to 60. The primary outcomes include surgical treatment for a complication and patient-reported function. Secondary outcomes include physical impairment, pain, and treatment cost.

Long-bone deformity may be significantly symptomatic. A uniplanar corrective osteotomy uses a single cut to correct coronal, sagittal, and axial plane deformity simultaneously. Careful preoperative planning is required in addition to a comprehensive understanding of the magnitude and plane of the true deformity of the bone. With precise operative technique and intraoperative assessment of correction, good results can be achieved.

Objectives To compare the compressive force achieved and retained with the lag versus positional screw technique at various angles of screw application. Methods Sixty humeral sawbones were stratified into 6 groups based on the technique (lag or positional) and fixation angle (30, 60, or 90 degrees relative to the fracture plane). A sensor was placed between fragments to record compressive force. Absolute screw force is the final screw force. Normalized force is the final screw force minus force generated by reduction forceps. Retained force is the quotient of absolute force relative to reduction forceps force. Results Lag screws attained higher force than positional at 60 degrees (absolute force 41% higher, P = 0.041; normalized force 1300% higher, P = 0.008; retained force 60% higher, P = 0.008) and 90 degrees (absolute force 86% higher, P = 0.006; normalized force 730% higher, P = 0.005; retained force 70% higher, P = 0.011), but not at 30 degrees. For lag screws, compressive force was similar at 60 and 90 degrees (absolute force P = 0.174, normalized force P = 0.364, and retained force P = 0.496), but not 30 degrees. For positional screws, no difference was found between the 3 angles of fixation for absolute force (P = 0.059). Normalized force and retained force were similar at 60 and 90 degrees (P = 0.944 and P = 0.725, respectively), but not 30 degrees. Conclusions Lag screw technique compressive force was superior to positional screw technique at 60 and 90 degrees. Comparison of force at angles of 60 and 90 degrees showed no significant difference for both techniques. Indicating 30 degrees deviation from perfect technique is tolerated without significant decrease in compressive force.

Exchange nailing has proven to be a reliable surgical technique for the management of aseptic femoral shaft nonunions. Similar to primary intramedullary nail fixation for femur fractures, exchange nailing for aseptic hypertrophic nonunions of the femur relies on successful navigation of the starting point and proper nail trajectory to minimize coronal and sagittal plane deformities. Compared with the supine position, the lateral decubitus position has the advantage of allowing gravity to displace the soft tissue around the piriformis start site to facilitate nail entry. In addition, the C-arm position and access to the affected limb from both sides by the surgeon and surgical assistant facilitate visualization of existing deformities and the ability to perform correction maneuvers. The purpose of this review is to highlight technical pearls associated with exchange nailing in a lateral decubitus position. Although other techniques are available, and should be used when indicated, exchange nailing provides patients with the opportunity to an early return to activity, improvement in pain and disability, and ultimate bony union.

Management of intraarticular distal radius fractures requires precise reconstruction of the articular surface to optimize outcomes. Treatment goals also include restoration of alignment, rotation, and angulation in both the coronal and sagittal planes of the metaphyseal component of these fractures. Surgical management with open reduction and internal fixation with a volar plate is often the preferred method of open treatment. However, a variety of different techniques have been described, and the preferred technique may be determined on an individual basis by the fracture characteristics, patient-dependent factors, or surgeon experience.

Elderly patients represent the fastest growing and most difficult to treat population sustaining acetabular fractures. When treated surgically, isolated extrapelvic or combined intrapelvic-extrapelvic constructs may be used. No biomechanical or clinical study has compared the merits of these 2 techniques in cadaveric models. This research aims to biomechanically quantify the additional benefit of intrapelvic fixation to a standard extrapelvic fixation construct.Ten cadaveric pelves underwent standardized anterior column and quadrilateral plate fracture creation. One hemipelvis from each subject received isolated extrapelvic fixation, whereas the other received adjunctive intrapelvic fixation. Specimens were then subjected to a 50% of body weight (BW) nondestructive stiffness test followed by loading to failure. For the 50% BW test, displacement at 50% BW and stiffness were calculated. For the load to failure test, stiffness, elastic energy, and plastic energy were calculated. Yield point, force at clinical failure (defined at 2 mm of displacement), and maximum force were also identified. A Wilcoxon matched-pairs t test was used to compare fixation groups.The addition of an intrapelvic plate improved construct performance for all test parameters. A statistically significant difference (P0.05) was reached for yield force, maximum force, and plastic energy.These findings demonstrate that the addition of intrapelvic plating may offer distinct advantages in prevention of catastrophic construct failure in situations in which significant lateral to medial force is applied to the greater trochanter such as patient falling.

OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy of distal interlocking during intramedullary nailing using a freehand technique versus an electromagnetic field real-time system (EFRTS). DESIGN A prospective, randomized controlled trial. SETTING Level I academic trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS Patients older than 18 years who sustained a femoral or tibial shaft fracture amenable to antegrade intramedullary nailing were prospectively enrolled between August 2010 and November 2011. Exclusion criteria included injuries requiring retrograde nailing and open wounds near the location of the distal interlocks (distal third of the femur, knee, or distal tibia). INTERVENTION Each patient had 2 distal interlocking screws placed: one using the freehand method and the other using EFRTS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT Techniques were compared on procedural time and number of interlocking screw misses. Two time points were measured: time 1 (time to find perfect circles/time from wand placement to drill initiation) and time 2 (drill initiation until completion of interlocking placement). RESULTS Twenty-four tibia and 24 femur fractures were studied. EFRTS proved faster at times 1 and 2 (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0002) and total time (P < 0.0001). This difference was larger for junior residents, though reached statistical significance for senior residents. Senior residents were faster with the freehand technique compared with junior residents (P < 0.004), but the 2 were similar using EFRTS (P = 0.41). The number of misses was higher with free hand compared with EFRTS (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION These results suggest that EFRTS is faster than the traditional freehand technique and results in fewer screw misses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Transabdominal gunshot wounds (GSWs) of the hip and pelvis are those that traverse the gastrointestinal system before entering the pelvis and/or hip. These injuries may be contaminated by bowel contents. Some require urgent surgical intervention; others can be managed nonsurgically. A primary survey with attention to hemodynamic status is of utmost priority. After obtaining hemodynamic stability and addressing abdominal injuries, careful attention must be paid to evaluating hip joint involvement and injuries to the genitourinary and vascular systems. The available literature shows that transabdominal GSW with intra-articular contamination should be urgently debrided and irrigated; extra-articular transabdominal GSW with stable fracture patterns may be managed with observation and empiric antibiotics. Extent of soft-tissue injury dictates the need for wound debridement. Bullets lodged in intra-articular locations should be removed, but retained bullets in other anatomic locations do not necessarily warrant removal.

Lessons learned from battle have been fundamental to advancing the care of injuries that occur in civilian life. Equally important is the need to further refine these advances in civilian practice, so they are available during future conflicts. The Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium (METRC) was established to address these needs.METRC is a network of 22 core level I civilian trauma centers and 4 core military treatment centers-with the ability to expand patient recruitment to more than 30 additional satellite trauma centers for the purpose of conducting multicenter research studies relevant to the treatment and outcomes of orthopaedic trauma sustained in the military. Early measures of success of the Consortium pertain to building of an infrastructure to support the network, managing the regulatory process, and enrolling and following patients in multiple studies.METRC has been successful in maintaining the engagement of several leading, high volume, level I trauma centers that form the core of METRC; together they operatively manage 15,432 major fractures annually. METRC is currently funded to conduct 18 prospective studies that address 6 priority areas. The design and implementation of these studies are managed through a single coordinating center. As of December 1, 2015, a total of 4560 participants have been enrolled.Success of METRC to date confirms the potential for civilian and military trauma centers to collaborate on critical research issues and leverage the strength that comes from engaging patients and providers from across multiple centers.

Vascular injury associated with extremity trauma occurs in

Study design Retrospective chart review of 311 anterior cervical procedures. Objectives To assess the incidence and variables that predispose to an airway complication in a large series of anterior cervical surgical procedures. Summary of background data A rare but potentially lethal complication after anterior cervical spine surgery is respiratory compromise and airway obstruction. Some risk factors are thought to include two-level corpectomy in myelopathic patients with a history of heavy smoking and asthma. No previous study in the literature has been directed at examining the factors specifically related to airway complications after anterior cervical spine surgery. Methods Each chart was examined for patient characteristics and pathology, anesthetic parameters and problems, operative procedure, and postoperative course and management. Statistical analysis was performed. Results Nineteen patients (6.1%) had an airway complication and six (1.9%) required reintubation. One patient died. Symptoms developed on average 36 hours postoperatively. All complications except for two were attributable to pharyngeal edema. Variables that were found to be statistically associated with an airway complication (P 300 mL, exposures involving C2, C3, or C4, and an operative time >5 hours. A history of myelopathy, spinal cord injury, pulmonary problems, smoking, anesthetic risk factors, and the absence of a drain did not correlate with an airway complication. Conclusions Patients with prolonged procedures (i.e., >5 hours) exposing more than three vertebral levels that include C2, C3, or C4 with more than 300-mL blood loss should be watched carefully for respiratory insufficiency.

Humeral shaft fractures account for approximately 3% of all fractures. Nonsurgical management of humeral shaft fractures with functional bracing gained popularity in the 1970s, and this method is arguably the standard of care for these fractures. Still, surgical management is indicated in certain situations, including polytraumatic injuries, open fractures, vascular injury, ipsilateral articular fractures, floating elbow injuries, and fractures that fail nonsurgical management. Surgical options include external fixation, open reduction and internal fixation, minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis, and antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing. Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages, and the rate of fracture union may vary based on the technique used. A relatively high incidence of radial nerve injury has been associated with surgical management of humeral shaft fractures. However, good surgical outcomes can be achieved with proper patient selection.

The complex anatomy of the pelvis and acetabulum have historically made classification and interpretation of acetabular fractures difficult for orthopedic trainees. The addition of 3-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography (CT) scan has gained popularity in preoperative planning, identification, and education of acetabular fractures given their complexity. Therefore, the authors examined the value of 3-D CT compared with conventional radiography in classifying acetabular fractures at different levels of orthopedic training. Their hypothesis was that 3-D CT would improve correct identification of acetabular fractures compared with conventional radiography. The classic Letournel fracture pattern classification system was presented in quiz format to 57 orthopedic residents and 20 fellowship-trained orthopedic traumatologists. A case consisted of (1) plain radiographs and 2-dimensional axial CT scans or (2) 3-D CT scans. All levels of training showed significant improvement in classifying acetabular fractures with 3-D vs 2-D CT, with the greatest benefit from 3-D CT found in junior residents (postgraduate years 1–3). Three-dimensional CT scans can be an effective educational tool for understanding the complex spatial anatomy of the pelvis, learning acetabular fracture patterns, and correctly applying a widely accepted fracture classification system.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors predicting poor radiographic and functional outcome and delayed total hip arthroplasty in operatively managed acetabular fractures in patients 55 years of age and older. DESIGN: Retrospective chart and radiographic review of a prospectively maintained database. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Ninety-three with a mean age of 67 years met all inclusion criteria and had follow up averaging 5 years. INTERVENTION: Open reduction and internal fixation and less commonly acute total hip arthroplasty for displaced acetabular fractures in an older cohort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Three validated patient self-assessment measures were used: the Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, and the SF-36. RESULTS: The overall rate of hip replacement in our study was 30.95%. Poor fracture reduction (P < 0.02), development of avascular necrosis (P < 0.001), and previous contralateral hip arthroplasty (P = 0.02) were statistically associated with the need for secondary surgeries. Functional outcome scores in the current study compared favorably with functional outcome scores reported for acetabular fractures in younger populations and with age-matched "non-injured" norms published in recent literature. CONCLUSIONS: There was an acceptably low rate of major complications in 93 operatively managed fractures in this population. Nearly 70% of patients achieved functional outcomes similar to age- and injury-matched control subjects without the need for secondary surgeries. Thirty percent of patients required secondary total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis. These patients achieved outcomes similar to patients in the other outcome groups and to injury- and age-matched norms.

Questions/Purposes To confirm this observation we compared the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and radiographic maintenance of fixation for fractures treated through direct posterior malleolar fixation versus syndesmotic screw fixation.

Background: Ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury treated via standard trans-syndesmotic fixation have a high percentage of syndesmotic malreduction.10We established a protocol involving both direct syndesmosis visualization and meticulous tibial incisura reconstruction via the posterior malleolus fracture fragment, when present, via the attached, intact PITFL, then compared this with historic controls to assess improvement after this type of syndesmosis reconstruction. Materials and Methods: One hundred forty-nine consecutive direct visualization patients were treated prospectively with either open posterior malleolus reduction and fixation, regardless of fragment size (“PM”: 38 patients), or, with no posterior malleolar fracture, open fixation with locked syndesmotic screws (“S”: 97 patients); fracture-dislocations combined both fixation types (“C”: 16 patients). The syndesmosis was opened and debrided in all. All patients had preoperative MRI and postoperative CT. Distances between the fibula and anterior and posterior incisura facets were measured on axial CT. An incongruent joint was defined as an A-P difference greater than 2 mm. Our historic controls were 25 patients previously fixed via indirect, fluoroscopic reduction and syndesmotic screws. Results: In the direct visualization group, 24 ankles (16%) had incongruity, compared with 13 controls (52%). The average difference between anterior and posterior colliculi measurements between PM and C was significant ( p = 0.017). Conclusion: Malreductions were significantly decreased in the direct visualization group. However, our reduction sometimes remains imprecise, even with direct visualization and attention to detail. Also, posterior malleolar reconstruction was more accurate than syndesmotic screw fixation in our study.

A retrospective case control review was conducted to determine if the MW construct offers a superior means of correction of Cobb angles and pelvic obliquity in neuromuscular scoliosis. Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis presents a surgical challenge. Particularly difficult is the correction of pelvic obliquity. Numerous instrumentation techniques have sought to address these difficulties. Most recently Arlet et al have introduced the MW construct. (in Eur Spine 8(3):229–231, 1999). They theorize that this construct may allow for superior spinopelvic fixation. Six patients with neuromuscular scoliosis who underwent PSF with the MW construct were compared with six subjects undergoing PSF utilizing the Galveston technique. Subjects were matched on the basis of preoperative Cobb angles and similar amounts of preoperative pelvic obliquity. Individuals who underwent PSF utilizing the MW construct obtained nearly 30% better correction of pelvic obliquity than did those who received a Galveston construct. A trend toward superior correction of Cobb angles with the MW construct was also observed. The MW construct may be a superior construct for curve correction in PSF for neuromuscular scoliosis, particularly those cases with excessive pelvic obliquity.

STUDY DESIGN Case report. OBJECTIVES Description of a rarely reported variant of traumatic C1-C2 dislocation and discussion of a favorable outcome in a nonsurgical treatment approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Atlantoaxial dislocation most commonly involves an anterior movement of C1 in relation to C2. Often, the integrity of the transverse ligament or odontoid process is compromised, and the atlantodental interval changed. The described patient sustained a purely craniocaudal atlantoaxial distractive lesion secondary to injury sustained in a high-speed motor vehicle accident. RESULTS The initial treatment plan involved surgical stabilization subsequent to healing of a C1 ring fracture. After 12 weeks of external stabilization, ligamentous damage appeared well resolved. That there was no gross instability delayed using a surgical option. At periodic checkup, the patient was without symptoms. CONCLUSION In this case, conservative management of a ligamentous C1-C2 injury was effective. At 5 years after trauma the patient was without sequelae. This outcome is in contrast to previous management of injuries of this type, all of which involved surgical intervention.

Reply: We appreciate the interest by Huang et al. in our article [1] and the opportunity to reply. The first concern of Dr. Huang and his colleagues regarded the patients we examined in our study population. They correctly note that supination-external rotation injuries do not always have syndesmotic involvement. In our case population, as noted in the article [1], all patients had a positive radiographic stress examination and preoperative MRI that confirmed syndesmotic involvement necessitating fixation. Their second point was whether our posterior malleolar fixation would provide sufficient stabilization for fractures with “greater instability.” We did not address this directly, but as we did mention, the posterior malleolus alone accounts for 42% of the strength of the syndesmosis [2]. We believe that if the medial side is reconstructed, either by fixation of a medial malleolar fracture or by repair of a torn deltoid ligament, additional syndesmotic fixation is unnecessary, even in more unstable injury patterns. Since reviewing the patients in our article [1], the senior author (DGL) has completely stopped augmenting posterior malleolar fixation with syndesmotic screws, even in fracture-dislocations. Each of these patients has stress testing after fixation and they no longer have any sign of instability. Thus, they have anatomic fixation without screws across the syndesmosis. The third question also addresses this topic, asking why a combination of posterior malleolar fixation and transsyndesmotic screw fixation was used in the more unstable fracture-dislocations. During the time we were accumulating this series of patients, we were unsure if the construct would be stable enough for these more severe injuries, but after this study and its predecessors were published and after review of our subsequent patient series (as yet unpublished), we do not believe more severe injuries need supplemental syndesmotic fixation. We thank Dr. Huang and his colleagues for their interest in our article.