Search

Accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurement is a challenging issue in oscillometry. Most of the automated noninvasive BP monitors estimate BP from envelope of the measured oscillometric pulses. The peak and the trough of the oscillometric pulses are very sensitive to noise caused by breathing, heart-rate variability, motion artifacts, muscle contraction, and environmental noise. Therefore, accuracy of the estimated BP based on the oscillometric waveform envelopes is not reliable in some cases. Recently, employing a modeling approach to estimate BP, we obtained the accurate results for a set of healthy subjects. The method is based on the lumen area oscillations model and estimates BP by comparing the actual and corresponding simulated waveforms. The method’s accuracy worsened when we tested it on a broader range of healthy subjects, while a significant drop was observed when the method was used for patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases. The work presented in this paper represents an improved version of our previous approach. We tested the proposed method on both healthy subjects and patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases, and compared the results to two popular BP estimation algorithms: maximum amplitude algorithm and maximum/minimum slope algorithm. We observed up to 56.7% and 57.3% improvements in mean absolute error, 98.9% and 64.4% improvements in mean error, 50% and 59% improvements in standard deviation of errors, and up to 57.6% and 55.8% in measurement uncertainty for the estimated systolic and diastolic pressures, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A variety of oscillometric algorithms have been recently proposed in the literature for estimation of blood pressure (BP). However, these algorithms possess specific strengths and weaknesses that should be taken into account before selecting the most appropriate one. In this paper, we propose a fusion method to exploit the advantages of the oscillometric algorithms and circumvent their limitations. The proposed fusion method is based on the computation of the weighted arithmetic mean of the oscillometric algorithms estimates, and the weights are obtained using a Bayesian approach by minimizing the mean square error. The proposed approach is used to fuse four different oscillometric blood pressure estimation algorithms. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated on a pilot dataset of 150 oscillometric recordings from 10 subjects. It is found that the mean error and standard deviation of error are reduced relative to the individual estimation algorithms by up to 7 mmHg and 3 mmHg in estimation of systolic pressure, respectively, and by up to 2 mmHg and 3 mmHg in estimation of diastolic pressure, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An accurate noninvasive estimation of mean arterial pressure (MAP) is of great importance in the evaluation of circulatory function and prognosis of some cardiovascular diseases. This paper proposes a novel oscillometric MAP estimation method based on the dependence of pulse transit time (PTT) on cuff pressure (CP). The PTT computed as the time interval between the electrocardiogram (ECG) R-peaks and the maximum slope points on the oscillometric pulses is mathematically modeled by considering the cuff-arm-artery system and the blood flow dynamics. It is then analytically shown that MAP can be approximated as the CP at which the PTT is maximum. Based on our theoretical findings, a new method of MAP estimation from simultaneous ECG and oscillometric blood pressure measurements is proposed. Our proposed method is validated with a pilot study in which 150 recordings from 10 subjects are analyzed. The reference MAP is computed from the systolic and diastolic pressures measured by the Food and Drug Administration-approved Omron HEM-790IT monitor using three different formulas given in the literature. The performance of our proposed method is compared with the maximum amplitude and zero-crossing methods in terms of mean error (ME), mean absolute error, and standard deviation of error (SDE). It is found that our proposed method achieves improvements of more than 20% in SDE compared with the maximum amplitude method and more than 50% in ME compared with the zero-crossing method. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Oscillometry is a popular technique for automatic estimation of blood pressure (BP). However, most of the oscillometric algorithms rely on empirical coefficients for systolic and diastolic pressure evaluation that may differ in various patient populations, rendering the technique unreliable. A promising complementary technique for automatic estimation of BP, based on the dependence of pulse transit time (PTT) on cuff pressure (CP) (PTT–CP mapping), has been proposed in the literature. However, a theoretical grounding for this technique and a nonparametric BP estimation approach are still missing. In this paper, we propose a novel coefficient-free BP estimation method based on PTT–CP dependence. PTT is mathematically modeled as a function of arterial lumen area under the cuff. It is then analytically shown that PTT–CP mappings computed from various points on the arterial pulses can be used to directly estimate systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure without empirical coefficients. Analytical results are cross-validated with a pilot investigation on ten healthy subjects where 150 simultaneous electrocardiogram and oscillometric BP recordings are analyzed. The results are encouraging whereby the mean absolute errors of the proposed method in estimating systolic and diastolic pressures are 5.31 and 4.51 mmHg, respectively, relative to the Food and Drug Administration approved Omron monitor. Our work thus shows promise toward providing robust and objective BP estimation in a variety of patients and monitoring situations. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Breathing causes fluctuations in blood pressure and contributes to variations in blood pressure estimates. In order to reduce the variability in the blood pressure estimates induced by breathing, either the breathing signal should be removed from the oscillometric blood pressure signal, or its effects should be suppressed. This paper presents a hybrid method that combines homomorphic and adaptive signal processing techniques to extract the breathing signal from the oscillometric signal with or without a simultaneously recorded electrocardiogram (ECG). The quality of the extracted breathing signal and the depth of breathing are assessed using the reference breathing signals. The breathing signals extracted using the accompanying ECG signal were found to be superior in quality compared to the ones extracted from the oscillometric waveform. The blood pressure estimates were evaluated before and after the breathing suppression techniques were implemented. As a result of the breathing suppression, the fluctuation of the systolic and diastolic blood pressure estimates obtained from a database of 85 healthy subjects is reduced. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oscillometry is the most common measurement method used in electronic blood pressure (BP) monitors. However, most of the existing oscillometric algorithms employ empirical ratios on the oscillometric waveform envelope (OMWE) to determine the systolic pressure (SP) and diastolic pressure (DP). As these algorithms do not consider the cardiovascular system parameters that may vary due to health conditions or age, the pressure estimates are not always reliable. In this paper, we develop a new mathematical model for the OMWE by incorporating an existing model of the cuff-arm-artery system. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Current noninvasive blood pressure (BP) measurement methods, such as the oscillometric method, estimate the systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) at two random instants in time and do not take into account the natural variability in BP. The standard for automated BP devices sets a maximum allowable system error of ±5 mmHg, even though natural BP variability often exceeds these limits. This paper proposes a new approach using simultaneous recordings of the oscillometric and continuous arterial pulse waveforms to augment the conventional noninvasive measurement by providing (1) the mean SBP and DBP over the measurement interval and the associated confidence intervals of the mean, (2) the standard deviation of SBP and DBP over the measurement interval, which indicates the degree of fluctuation in BP and (3) an indicator as to whether or not the oscillometric reading is an outlier. Recordings with healthy subjects demonstrate the potential utility of this approach to characterize BP, to detect outlier measurements, and that it does not suffer from bias relative to the conventional oscillometric method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Current oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices generally provide only singlepoint estimates for systolic and diastolic blood pressures and rarely provide confidence ranges for these estimates. A novel methodology to obtain confidence intervals (CIs) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) estimates from a single oscillometric blood pressure measurement is presented. Methods: The proposed methodology utilizes the multiple regression technique to fuse optimally a set of SBP and DBP estimates obtained through different algorithms. However, the set of SBP and DBP estimates is a small number to determine the CI of each individual subject. To address this issue, the weighted bootstrap approach based on the multiple regression technique was used to generate a pseudo sample set for the SBP and the DBP. In this paper, the multiple regression technique can estimate the best-fitting surface of an efficient function that relates the input sample set as an independent vector to the auscultatory nurse measurement as a dependent vector to estimate regression coefficients. Consequently, the coefficients are assigned to an eight-sample set obtained from the fusion of different algorithms as optimally weighted parameters. CIs are also estimated using the conventional methods on the set of fused SBP and DBP estimates for comparison purposes. Results: The proposed method was applied to an experimental dataset of 85 patients. The results indicated that the proposed approach provides better blood pressure estimates than the existing algorithms and, in addition, is able to provide CIs for a single measurement. Conclusions: The CIs derived from the proposed scheme are much smaller than those calculated by conventional methods except for the pseudo maximum amplitude-envelope algorithm for both the SBP and the DBP, probably because of the decrease in the standard deviation through the increase in the pseudo measurements using the weighted bootstrap method for each subject. The proposed methodology is likely the only one currently available that can provide CIs for single-sample blood pressure measurements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]