Search

Background: Blood pressure (BP) is one of the most important vital indicators and plays a key role in determining the cardiovascular activity of patients., Methods: This paper proposes a hybrid approach consisting of nonparametric bootstrap (NPB) and machine learning techniques to obtain the characteristic ratios (CR) used in the blood pressure estimation algorithm to improve the accuracy of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) estimates and obtain confidence intervals (CI). The NPB technique is used to circumvent the requirement for large sample set for obtaining the CI. A mixture of Gaussian densities is assumed for the CRs and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) is chosen to estimate the SBP and DBP ratios. The K-means clustering technique is used to obtain the mixture order of the Gaussian densities., Results: The proposed approach achieves grade "A" under British Society of Hypertension testing protocol and is superior to the conventional approach based on maximum amplitude algorithm (MAA) that uses fixed CR ratios. The proposed approach also yields a lower mean error (ME) and the standard deviation of the error (SDE) in the estimates when compared to the conventional MAA method. In addition, CIs obtained through the proposed hybrid approach are also narrower with a lower SDE., Conclusions: The proposed approach combining the NPB technique with the GMM provides a methodology to derive individualized characteristic ratio. The results exhibit that the proposed approach enhances the accuracy of SBP and DBP estimation and provides narrower confidence intervals for the estimates., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A variety of oscillometric algorithms have been recently proposed in the literature for estimation of blood pressure (BP). However, these algorithms possess specific strengths and weaknesses that should be taken into account before selecting the most appropriate one. In this paper, we propose a fusion method to exploit the advantages of the oscillometric algorithms and circumvent their limitations. The proposed fusion method is based on the computation of the weighted arithmetic mean of the oscillometric algorithms estimates, and the weights are obtained using a Bayesian approach by minimizing the mean square error. The proposed approach is used to fuse four different oscillometric blood pressure estimation algorithms. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated on a pilot dataset of 150 oscillometric recordings from 10 subjects. It is found that the mean error and standard deviation of error are reduced relative to the individual estimation algorithms by up to 7 mmHg and 3 mmHg in estimation of systolic pressure, respectively, and by up to 2 mmHg and 3 mmHg in estimation of diastolic pressure, respectively., (Copyright © 2016 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The use of automated blood pressure (BP) monitoring is growing as it does not require much expertise and can be performed by patients several times a day at home. Oscillometry is one of the most common measurement methods used in automated BP monitors. A review of the literature shows that a large variety of oscillometric algorithms have been developed for accurate estimation of BP but these algorithms are scattered in many different publications or patents. Moreover, considering that oscillometric devices dominate the home BP monitoring market, little effort has been made to survey the underlying algorithms that are used to estimate BP. In this review, a comprehensive survey of the existing oscillometric BP estimation algorithms is presented. The survey covers a broad spectrum of algorithms including the conventional maximum amplitude and derivative oscillometry as well as the recently proposed learning algorithms, model-based algorithms, and algorithms that are based on analysis of pulse morphology and pulse transit time. The aim is to classify the diverse underlying algorithms, describe each algorithm briefly, and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. This paper will also review the artifact removal techniques in oscillometry and the current standards for the automated BP monitors.

Oscillometry is a popular technique for automatic estimation of blood pressure (BP). However, most of the oscillometric algorithms rely on empirical coefficients for systolic and diastolic pressure evaluation that may differ in various patient populations, rendering the technique unreliable. A promising complementary technique for automatic estimation of BP, based on the dependence of pulse transit time (PTT) on cuff pressure (CP) (PTT-CP mapping), has been proposed in the literature. However, a theoretical grounding for this technique and a nonparametric BP estimation approach are still missing. In this paper, we propose a novel coefficient-free BP estimation method based on PTT-CP dependence. PTT is mathematically modeled as a function of arterial lumen area under the cuff. It is then analytically shown that PTT-CP mappings computed from various points on the arterial pulses can be used to directly estimate systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure without empirical coefficients. Analytical results are cross-validated with a pilot investigation on ten healthy subjects where 150 simultaneous electrocardiogram and oscillometric BP recordings are analyzed. The results are encouraging whereby the mean absolute errors of the proposed method in estimating systolic and diastolic pressures are 5.31 and 4.51 mmHg, respectively, relative to the Food and Drug Administration approved Omron monitor. Our work thus shows promise toward providing robust and objective BP estimation in a variety of patients and monitoring situations.

A new oscillometric pulse index (OPI) derived from the maximum slope (MS) of each pulse in the oscillometric blood pressure waveform is proposed for blood pressure estimation. Maximum slope for each pulse is obtained using the first derivative of the pulse and an envelope of the values corresponding to the maximum slopes is obtained. The maximum of the envelope is taken as the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) estimates are obtained as a fraction of the MAP, similar to the traditional maximum amplitude algorithm (MAA). The proposed algorithm is tested on 18 healthy subjects. The MAP, SBP and DBP estimates obtained from the proposed algorithm are compared with those obtained from a commercial blood pressure device and with the estimates obtained using the MAA and morphological qualitative measures available in the literature.

Noninvasive blood pressure (BP) measurement is an important tool for managing hypertension and cardiovascular disease. However, automated noninvasive BP measurement devices, which are usually based on the oscillometric method, do not always provide accurate estimation of BP. It has been found that change in arterial stiffness (AS) is an underlying mechanism of disagreement between an oscillometric BP monitor and a sphygmomanometer. This problem is addressed by incorporating parameters related to AS in the algorithm for BP measurement. Pulse transit time (PTT) is first used to estimate AS parameters, which are fixed into a model of the oscillometric envelope. This model can then be used to perform curve fitting to the measured signal using only four parameters: systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean BP, and lumen area at zero transmural pressure. The proposed technique is independent of the experimentally determined characteristic ratios that are commonly used in existing oscillometric methods. The accuracy of the proposed technique was evaluated by comparing with the same model without incorporation of AS, and with reference BP device measurements. The new method achieved standard deviation of error less than 8 mmHg and mean error less than 5 mmHg. The results show consistency with ANSI/AAMI SP-10 standard for noninvasive BP measurement techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurement is a challenging issue in oscillometry. Most of the automated noninvasive BP monitors estimate BP from envelope of the measured oscillometric pulses. The peak and the trough of the oscillometric pulses are very sensitive to noise caused by breathing, heart-rate variability, motion artifacts, muscle contraction, and environmental noise. Therefore, accuracy of the estimated BP based on the oscillometric waveform envelopes is not reliable in some cases. Recently, employing a modeling approach to estimate BP, we obtained the accurate results for a set of healthy subjects. The method is based on the lumen area oscillations model and estimates BP by comparing the actual and corresponding simulated waveforms. The method’s accuracy worsened when we tested it on a broader range of healthy subjects, while a significant drop was observed when the method was used for patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases. The work presented in this paper represents an improved version of our previous approach. We tested the proposed method on both healthy subjects and patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases, and compared the results to two popular BP estimation algorithms: maximum amplitude algorithm and maximum/minimum slope algorithm. We observed up to 56.7% and 57.3% improvements in mean absolute error, 98.9% and 64.4% improvements in mean error, 50% and 59% improvements in standard deviation of errors, and up to 57.6% and 55.8% in measurement uncertainty for the estimated systolic and diastolic pressures, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An accurate noninvasive estimation of mean arterial pressure (MAP) is of great importance in the evaluation of circulatory function and prognosis of some cardiovascular diseases. This paper proposes a novel oscillometric MAP estimation method based on the dependence of pulse transit time (PTT) on cuff pressure (CP). The PTT computed as the time interval between the electrocardiogram (ECG) R-peaks and the maximum slope points on the oscillometric pulses is mathematically modeled by considering the cuff-arm-artery system and the blood flow dynamics. It is then analytically shown that MAP can be approximated as the CP at which the PTT is maximum. Based on our theoretical findings, a new method of MAP estimation from simultaneous ECG and oscillometric blood pressure measurements is proposed. Our proposed method is validated with a pilot study in which 150 recordings from 10 subjects are analyzed. The reference MAP is computed from the systolic and diastolic pressures measured by the Food and Drug Administration-approved Omron HEM-790IT monitor using three different formulas given in the literature. The performance of our proposed method is compared with the maximum amplitude and zero-crossing methods in terms of mean error (ME), mean absolute error, and standard deviation of error (SDE). It is found that our proposed method achieves improvements of more than 20% in SDE compared with the maximum amplitude method and more than 50% in ME compared with the zero-crossing method. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Oscillometry is the most common measurement method used in electronic blood pressure (BP) monitors. However, most of the existing oscillometric algorithms employ empirical ratios on the oscillometric waveform envelope (OMWE) to determine the systolic pressure (SP) and diastolic pressure (DP). As these algorithms do not consider the cardiovascular system parameters that may vary due to health conditions or age, the pressure estimates are not always reliable. In this paper, we develop a new mathematical model for the OMWE by incorporating an existing model of the cuff-arm-artery system. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]