Search

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of increasing the tibial boundaries in functional alignment on femoral component orientation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)., Methods: A retrospective review of a database of robotic-assisted TKAs using a digital joint tensioning device was performed (BalanceBot®; Corin). A total of 692 TKAs with correctable deformity were included. Functional alignment with a tibia-first balancing technique was simulated by performing an anatomic tibial resection to recreate the native medial proximal tibial angle within certain boundaries (A, 87-90°; B, 86-90°; C, 84-92°), while accounting for wear. After balancing the knee, the resulting amount of femoral component outliers in the coronal and axial plane was calculated for each group and correlated to the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification., Results: The proportion of knees with high femoral component varus (>96°) or valgus (<87°) alignment increased from 24.5% (n = 170) in group A to 26.5% (n = 183) in group B and 34.2% (n = 237) in group C (p < 0.05). Similarly, more knees with high femoral component external rotation (>6°) or internal rotation (>3°) were identified in group C (33.4%, n = 231) than in group B (23.7%, n = 164) and A (18.4%, n = 127) (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant (p < 0.01) overall increase in knees with both femoral component valgus <87° and internal rotation >3° from group A (4.0%, n = 28) to B (7.7%, n = 53) and C (15.8%, n = 109), with CPAK type I and II showing a 12.9- and 2.9-fold increase, respectively., Conclusion: Extending the tibial boundaries when using functional alignment with a tibia-first balancing technique in TKA leads to a statistically significant higher percentage of knees with a valgus lateral distal femoral angle < 87° and >3° internal rotation of the femoral component, especially in CPAK type I and II., Level of Evidence: Level IV., (© 2024 European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.)

Purpose: Appropriate positioning and alignment of tibial and femoral component in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are factors of major importance directly related to patient satisfaction and implant survival. Most literature works elaborate on overall post-operative alignment and its correlation to implant survival. However, less is known about the impact of individual component alignment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of undercorrection of overall alignment as well as the effect of individual tibial and femoral component alignment on the post-operative failure rate after total knee arthroplasty., Methods: Clinical and radiographic data of primary TKA cases from 2002 to 2004, with a minimum of 10-year follow-up, were retrospectively reviewed. The pre- and post-operative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured on weight-bearing, full-length antero-posterior lower limb radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed to establish the correlation between both overall and implant alignment and revision rate., Results: In total, 379 primary TKA cases were evaluated. The mean time of follow-up was 12.9 years (range 10.3-15.9 years, SD = 1.8). Nine out of 379 cases were revised due to aseptic loosening; the mean time to revision was 5.5 years (range 1.0-15.5 years, SD = 4.6). Varus undercorrection of overall alignment was not associated with a higher rate of revision (p = 0.316). Post-operative valgus femoral alignment (mLDFA < 87°) contributed to a significant decreased prosthesis survival in contrast to neutral femoral alignment (revision rate valgus group: 10.7% and neutral group: 1.7%; p = 0.003). Post-operative tibial mechanical alignment was not identified as a significant predictor for implant survival (revision rate varus group: 2.9% and neutral group: 2.4%; p = 0.855)., Conclusions: Primary TKA showed significantly higher revision rates when the femoral component was placed in > 3° of valgus (mLDFA < 87°). In contrast, postoperative overall residual varus alignment (HKA) and varus alignment of the tibial component were not related to higher revision rates at a minimum 10-year follow-up after TKA. These findings should be considered when choosing component position in individualised TKA., Level of Evidence: III., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).)

Purpose: The purpose was to determine the proportion of native non-arthritic knees that fit within the target zones of adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA), restricted kinematic alignment (rKA), and inverse kinematic alignment (iKA), and to estimate adjustments in native coronal alignment to bring outlier knees within the respective target zones. The hypothesis was that the target zone of iKA, compared to the target zones of aMA and rKA, accommodates a higher proportion of native non-arthritic knees., Methods: The study used measurements obtained from a computed tomography (CT) scan database (SOMA, Stryker) of 972 healthy knees (Caucasian, 586; Asian, 386). Hip knee ankle (HKA) angle, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were used to estimate the proportions of knees within the patient-specific alignment target zones; and to estimate theoretical adjustments of MPTA, LDFA and soft tissue balance (HKA) to bring outlier knees within target zones. Theoretical adjustments to bring outlier knees within the alignment target zones of aMA, rKA and iKA were calculated by subtracting the native coronal alignment angles (MPTA native , LDFA native and HKA native ) from angles on the nearest target zone border (MPTA target , LDFA target and HKA target )., Results: Patients were aged 59.8 ± 15.8 years with a BMI of 25.0 ± 4.4 kg/m 2 . The HKA angles were between 168° and 186°, MPTA between 78° and 98° and LDFA between 79° and 93°. Of the 972 knees, 81 (8%) were in the aMA target zone, 530 (55%) were in the rKA target zone, and 721 (74%) were in the iKA target zone. Adjustments of MPTA, LDFA and HKA angle to bring outlier knees within the target zones, were, respectively, 90, 91 and 28% for aMA, 45, 28 and 25% for rKA, and 25, 23 and 7% for iKA., Conclusions: There is considerable variability in native knee coronal alignment that corresponds to different proportions of the restricted patient-specific alignment target zones for TKA. Although extension of the MPTA and LDFA target zones with rKA accommodate native knee alignment better than aMA, up to 25% would require adjustment of native HKA angle. By also extending the HKA angle target zone into varus, iKA accommodates a greater proportion (93%) of native limb alignment., Level of Evidence: IV., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).)

Introduction: Robotic systems have been introduced to improve the precision of total knee arthroplasty. However, different robotic systems are available, each with unique features used to plan and execute the surgery. As such, due to this diversity, the clinical evaluation of each robotic platform should be separated., Methods: An extensive literature search of PubMed, Medline, Embase and Web of Science was conducted with subsequent meta-analysis. Randomised controlled trials, comparative studies, and cohort studies were included regarding robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Evaluated outcomes included clinical results, surgical precision, ligament balance, surgical time, learning curve, complications and revision rates. These were split up based on the robot-specific brand: ROBODOC (T-SOLUTION ONE), OMNIBOT, MAKO, NAVIO (CORI) and ROSA., Results: With a follow-up of more than 10 years, no improved clinical outcomes have been noted with the ROBODOC system compared to the conventional technique. If available, other platforms only present short-term clinical outcomes. Radiological outcomes are published for most robotic setups, demonstrating improved surgical precision compared to the conventional technique. Gap balance assessment is performed differently between all systems, leading to heterogeneous outcomes regarding its relationship on clinical outcomes. There is a similar learning curve based on operative time for all robotic platforms. In most studies, robot assistance requires longer operative time compared to the conventional technique. Complications and revision rates are published for ROBODOC and MAKO, without clear differences to conventional total knee arthroplasty., Conclusion: The main finding of this systematic review is that the current evidence regarding each robotic system is diverse in quantity and quality. Each system has its own specificities and must be assessed for its own value. Regarding scientific literature, the generic term of robotic should be banned from the general conclusion., Level of Evidence: Systematic review level IV., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Robotically assisted surgery was introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to increase the precision of implant positioning and optimize clinical outcomes. However, the target implant position or alignment is debated. The aim of this study was twofold: to compare clinical outcomes of conventional TKA vs. robotically assisted TKA in an adjusted mechanically aligned (MA) TKA series, and to analyze the clinical effects of introducing patient-specific alignment (inverse kinematic alignment, iKA) in a robotically assisted TKA cohort., Materials and Methods: A total of 120 patients with end stage osteoarthritis of the knee were enrolled. The first group (n = 40) received conventional adjusted MA TKA. The second group (n = 40) received robotically assisted adjusted MA TKA. The third group (n = 40) received robotically assisted iKA TKA. All patients received cruciate retaining Triathlon TKA with a uniform surgery protocol. The three groups were matched for age, sex, BMI and preoperative osteoarthritis. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative clinical outcomes were documented with the Oxford Knee Score (OKS)., Results: Comparison of OKS between the MA groups indicated no significant difference (p = 0.223) between the conventional TKA (group 1; 40.2 ± 5.9) and robotically assisted TKA (group 2; 42.2 ± 6.3) 1 year postoperatively. Comparison of OKS between the robotically assisted groups indicated no significant difference (p = 0.078) between the MA TKA (group 2; 42.2 ± 6.3) and iKA TKA (group 3; 44.8 ± 3.5). Comparison of conventional MA TKA (group 1; 40.3 ± 6.0) with robotically assisted iKA TKA (group 3; 44.8 ± 3.5) indicated a significant difference (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the introduction of both patient-specific alignment and robotically assisted surgery improve clinical outcomes in TKA surgery. When access to robotic assistance is available, performing patient-specific alignment should be the objective., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Patient specific alignment might improve clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different alignment concepts are described, each providing specific features with theoretical benefits or possible disadvantages. Inverse kinematic alignment (iKA) is a new patient specific alignment concept with excellent reported clinical outcome and patient satisfaction at short-term follow-up. iKA is a tibia-first, gap balancing technique restoring the native tibial joint line obliquity (JLO). In each patient, within boundaries, equal medial and lateral tibial resections are performed, compensating for cartilage and bone loss. We describe the surgical technique of iKA using a robotic assisted system (Mako, Stryker, Kalamazoo, USA). A case series of 100 consecutive iKA cases is assessed and the bony resections and resection angles are reported. Both in the coronal plane and axial plane, iKA might offer advantages over existing alignment strategies, possibly providing optimal clinical outcome and durable long-term survival, regardless of the alignment is varus, neutral or valgus., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Joint imbalance has become one of the main reasons for early revision after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and it is directly related to the surgical technique. Therefore, a better understanding of how much bone has to be removed to obtain a balanced flexion/extension gap could improve current practice. The primary objective of this study was to analyse the amount of bone that needed to be removed from the distal and posterior femoral joint surfaces to obtain an equal flexion/extension gap in robot-assisted TKA. The second objective of this study was to evaluate whether the size of the knee joint influenced the amount of bony resection needed to achieve an equal flexion/extension gap in robot-assisted TKA., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients receiving a robot-assisted TKA (Cruciate Retaining (n = 268)) by six surgeons from April 2018 to September 2019. The robot was used consecutively when available in all patients receiving Cruciate Retaining TKA. Gap assessment, bony resections, femoral implant size and hip-knee-ankle angle were evaluated with the robot. Femoral implant size was categorized into small (size 1-2), medium (size 3-5) and large (size 6-8)., Results: The difference between the posterior and distal resection needed to obtain equal flexion and extension gap was on average 2.0 mm (SD 1.6) and 1.5 mm (SD 2.2) for the medial and lateral compartment, respectively. The discrepancy was smaller in the large implant group compared to the small implant group (p < .05 medial and lateral) and medium implant group (p < .05 medial). Varus knees required a larger differential resection compared to neutral and valgus knees (only laterally) (medial compartment: p < .05 (varus-neutral), p = .051 (varus-valgus); lateral compartment: p < .05 (varus-neutral and varus-valgus)., Conclusion: Removing an equal amount of bone from the distal and posterior femur will lead to flexion/extension gap imbalance in TKA. It was required to remove 1.5-2 mm more bone from the posterior femur compared to the distal femur to equalize flexion and extension gap. This effect was size dependent: in larger knees, the discrepancy between the distal and posterior resections was smaller., Level of Evidence: IV., (© 2021. European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).)

Background: Trunk control improves mobility, balance and quality of life early after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and is therefore considered an important parameter during the recovery process. However, little is known about trunk control, motion and alignment after TKA. Increasing our understanding aids in optimizing treatment strategies to enhance functional mobility after TKA., Research Question: Does trunk control, motion and alignment return to normal after TKA and is this related to functional mobility?, Methods: Five scientific databases were searched until July 2021. Eligibility criteria consisted of outcomes assessing trunk control and alignment in a population of adults undergoing TKA. Two reviewers independently screened studies and risk of bias was assessed by Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Meta-analysis was performed for subgroups gait and alignment., Results: Of the 362 studies retrieved, 24 were included. Study designs were cohorts with mixed methods (pre-post treatment, case-control and case-case) and three randomized controlled trials. The mean MMAT score was 75%, corresponding to low bias. In total 1178 patients and 197 controls were included. Results showed that pre-operative trunk motion was characterized by increased amplitudes in all three planes and altered alignment which did not all return to normal after TKA. Frontal plane motion and alignment recovered faster than the sagittal and transversal plane. Although pelvic tilt improved after surgery, sagittal imbalance (anteriorly shifted trunk position) was still present., Significance: Recovery of trunk motion after TKA is time-, speed- and technique-dependent. The observed differences in trunk motion with the healthy controls persisted after TKA. This indicates that incorporating a full biomechanical chain approach, including trunk motion and gait-retraining exercises with a strong focus on postural alignment could improve functional mobility after TKA. Limited studies are available assessing trunk control and trunk motion during functional tasks besides walking which warrant further investigation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Various alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been described, all striving to achieve excellent long-term implant survival and good functional outcomes. In recent years, in search of higher functionality and patient satisfaction, a shift towards more tailored and patient-specific alignment is seen. The purpose of this study was to describe a restricted 'inverse kinematic alignment' (iKA) technique, and to compare clinical outcomes of patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA performed by restricted iKA vs. adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA)., Methods: The authors reviewed the records of a consecutive series of patients that received robotic-assisted TKA with restricted iKA (n = 40) and with aMA (n = 40). Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected at a follow-up of 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds, and uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations of OKS and satisfaction with six variables (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, preoperative OKS, alignment technique)., Results: The restricted iKA and aMA techniques yielded comparable outcome scores (p = 0.069), with OKS, respectively, 44.6 ± 3.5 and 42.2 ± 6.3. VAS Satisfaction was better (p = 0.012) with restricted iKA (9.2 ± 0.8) compared to aMA (8.5 ± 1.3). The number of patients that achieved OKS and satisfaction PASS thresholds was significantly higher (p = 0.049 and p = 0.003, respectively) using restricted iKA (98% and 80%) compared to aMA (85% and 48%). Knees with preoperative varus deformity, achieved significantly (p = 0.025) better OKS using restricted iKA (45.4 ± 2.0) compared to aMA (41.4 ± 6.8). Multivariable analyses confirmed better OKS (β = 3.1; p = 0.007) and satisfaction (β = 0.73; p = 0.005) with restricted iKA., Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that restricted iKA and aMA grant comparable clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up, though a greater proportion of knees operated by restricted iKA achieved the PASS thresholds for OKS and satisfaction. Notably. in knees with preoperative varus deformity, restricted iKA yielded significantly better OKS and satisfaction than aMA., Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study., (© 2020. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The application of robotics in the operating theatre for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. As with all new technology, the introduction of new systems is associated with a learning curve and potentially associated with extra complications. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify and predict the learning curve of robot-assisted (RA) TKA., Methods: A RA TKA system (MAKO) was introduced in April 2018 in our service. A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients receiving a TKA with this system by six surgeons. Operative times, implant and limb alignment, intraoperative joint balance and robot-related complications were evaluated. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) analyses were used to assess learning curves for operative time, implant alignment and joint balance in RA TKA. Linear regression was performed to predict the learning curve of each surgeon., Results: RA TKA was associated with a learning curve of 11-43 cases for operative time (p < 0.001). This learning curve was significantly affected by the surgical profile (high vs. medium vs. low volume). A complete normalisation of operative times was seen in four out of five surgeons. The precision of implant positioning and gap balancing showed no learning curve. An average deviation of 0.2° (SD 1.4), 0.7° (SD 1.1), 1.2 (SD 2.1), 0.2° (SD 2.9) and 0.3 (SD 2.4) for the mLDFA, MPTA, HKA, PDFA and PPTA from the preoperative plan was observed. Limb alignment showed a mean deviation of 1.2° (SD 2.1) towards valgus postoperatively compared to the intraoperative plan. One tibial stress fracture was seen as a complication due to suboptimal positioning of the registration pins., Conclusion: RA TKA is associated with a learning curve for surgical time, which might be longer than reported in current literature and dependent on the profile of the surgeon. There is no learning curve for component alignment, limb alignment and gap balancing., Level of Evidence: IV., (© 2020. European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).)

Purpose: This study was set up to identify the native trochlear geometry and define its relationship with the rotational landmarks of the distal femur., Methods: The rotational landmarks of the distal femur were analysed on CT-scans of 281 patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis., Results: The anterior trochlear line (ATL) was on average 4.3° (SD 3.3°) internally rotated relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA). The ATL was on average 2.1° (SD 3.0°) internally rotated relative to the posterior condylar line (PCL). The relationship between the ATL and the sTEA was statistically different in the different coronal alignment groups (p = 0.004): 3.9° (SD 3.0°) in varus knees, 4.0° (SD 2.9°) in neutral knees and 5.4° (SD 3.8°) in valgus knees. The lateralisation of the trochlea, represented by the distance between the perpendicular to PCL and the perpendicular to the posterior parallel line to the sTEA, was on average 2.2 mm (SD 1.8 mm)., Conclusion: The ATL was on average 4.3° (SD 3.3°) internally rotated relative to the sTEA and 2.1° (SD 3.0°) internally rotated relative to the PCL. The ATL is more externally orientated in varus knees and more internally rotated in valgus knees. The trochlear groove is lateralised by only 2.2 mm when the femoral component is externally rotated., Level of Evidence: III.

Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an alternative to total knee arthroplasty in isolated medial osteoarthritis (OA). However, despite satisfactory reports on the clinical performance, UKA revision rates are still concerning. This retrospective study reports on the long-term survivorship, functional outcomes, and reasons for revision in fixed-bearing UKA implant., Methods: Between 2005 and 2013, 460 consecutive patients were treated with medial UKA in one center using a fixed-bearing UKA system. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically before surgery, and postoperatively at 6 weeks and 1 year. Between February and April 2016, all patients were reevaluated using the Oxford Knee Score., Results: Mean follow-up was 5.5 (range, 2-11) years. The mean Oxford Knee Score was 43.3 (7-48), with 94.6% patients showing excellent or good outcomes. Eleven revisions (2.4%) occurred. The survivorship was 97.2% (95% confidence interval, 96.2%-99.2%) and 94.2% (95% confidence interval, 86.8%-97.5%) at 5 and 10 years, respectively, with revision of any implant component for any reason as the end point. The causes for revision were infection (4 cases, 0.9%); lateral pain due to overload (2 cases, 0.4%); progression of OA in the lateral compartment (2 cases, 0.4%); patellar pain with patellar chondropathy (2 cases, 0.4%); and severe synovitis (1 cases, 0.2%). There were no reoperations or revisions for component loosening, instability, component wear, or periprosthetic fracture., Conclusion: A fixed-bearing UKA system is a good treatment option for medial end-stage OA. Satisfactory functional results were achieved with low incidence of complications and revisions., (Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Although several anatomical landmarks have been proposed to obtain adequate femoral component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is still no consensus regarding the best way to correctly position the prosthetic component on the horizontal plane. A previous computed tomography (CT)-based study has demonstrated anatomical transepicondylar axis (aTEA) to be externally rotated relative to surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) of approximately 4.5°. In this study, it is described a new methodological approach to femoral component rotational positioning through the use of previously reported CT scan information and navigation., Methods: Eight consecutive patients scheduled for navigated TKA were selected. Rotational placement of the femoral component was performed using navigation system. The femoral component was implanted setting 4.5° of internal rotation relative to the aTEA. Within 1 week from surgery, all patients underwent a CT scan, and the posterior condylar angle (PCA) was measured. A PCA of 0.0°, meaning component placement parallel to sTEA, was set as femoral rotational alignment target. Clinical evaluation was performed at a mean 14.3 months of follow-up with KOOS questionnaire., Results: The mean PCA measured on post-operative CT images was 0.4° (SD 1.3°), meaning that the femoral component was averagely implanted with 0.4° of internal rotation relative to the sTEA. Seven out of eight cases (87.5 %) resulted to have within 1° deviation from the rotational alignment target. All patients but one reported good clinical results., Conclusions: Relevant finding of the present study was that the use of navigation and aTEA as a reference demonstrated to be accurate to set up femoral component rotational positioning on the horizontal plane in TKA. Further study should be performed to confirm this conclusion.

Purpose: There is a lot of inter-individual variation in the rotational anatomy of the distal femur. This study was set up to define the rotational anatomy of the distal femur in the osteo-arthritic knee and to investigate its relationship with the overall coronal alignment and gender., Methods: CT-scans of 231 patients with end-stage knee osteo-arthritis prior to TKA surgery were obtained. This represents the biggest series published on rational geometry of the distal femur in literature so far., Results: The posterior condylar line (PCL) was on average 1.6° (SD 1.9) internally rotated relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA). The perpendicular to trochlear anteroposterior axis (⊥TRAx) was on average 4.8° (SD 3.3°) externally rotated relative to the sTEA. The relationship between the PCL and the sTEA was statistically different in the different coronal alignment groups (p < 0.001): 1.0° (SD 1.8°) in varus knees, 2.1° (SD 1.8°) in neutral knees and 2.6° (SD 1.8°) in valgus knees. The same was true for the ⊥TRAx in these 3 groups (p < 0.02).There was a clear linear relationship between the overall coronal alignment and the rotational geometry of the distal femur. For every 1° in coronal alignment increment from varus to valgus, there is a 0.1° increment in posterior condylar angle (PCL vs sTEA)., Conclusion: The PCL was on average 1.6° internally rotated relative to the sTEA in the osteo-arthritic knee. The relationship between the PCL and the sTEA was statistically different in the different coronal alignment groups., Level of Evidence: III.

Obtaining a balanced flexion gap with correct femoral component rotation is one of the prerequisites for a successful outcome after total knee replacement (TKR). Different techniques for achieving this have been described. In this study we prospectively compared gap-balancing versus measured resection in terms of reliability and accuracy for femoral component rotation in 96 primary TKRs performed in 96 patients using the Journey system. In 48 patients (18 men and 30 women) with a mean age of 65 years (45 to 85) a tensor device was used to determine rotation. In the second group of 48 patients (14 men and 34 women) with a mean age of 64 years (41 to 86), an 'adapted' measured resection technique was used, taking into account the native rotational geometry of the femur as measured on a pre-operative CT scan. Both groups systematically reproduced a similar external rotation of the femoral component relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis: 2.4° (SD 2.5) in the gap-balancing group and 1.7° (SD 2.1) in the measured resection group (p = 0.134). Both gap-balancing and adapted measured resection techniques proved equally reliable and accurate in determining femoral component rotation after TKR. There was a tendency towards more external rotation in the gap-balancing group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.134). The number of outliers for our 'adapted' measured resection technique was much lower than reported in the literature.