Search

Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) therapies are frequently evaluated by bone mineral density (BMD) gains against patients receiving placebo (calcium and vitamin D supplementation, a mild bone turnover-suppressing intervention), which is not equivalent to either healthy or treatment-naive PMOP. The aim of the present observational study was to assess the effects of TPTD treatment in PMOP (20 μg, once daily) at 6 (TPTD 6m; n = 28, age 65 ± 7.3 years), and 24 (TPTD 24m; n = 32, age 67.4 ± 6.15 years) months on bone quality indices at actively forming trabecular surfaces (with fluorescent double labels). Data from the TPTD-treated PMOP patients were compared with those in healthy adult premenopausal women (HC; n = 62, age 40.5 ± 10.6 years), and PMOP receiving placebo (PMOP-PLC; n = 94, age 70.6 ± 4.5 years). Iliac crest biopsies were analyzed by Raman microspectroscopy at three distinct tissue ages: mid-distance between the second label and the bone surface, mid-distance between the two labels, and 1 μm behind the first label. Mineral to matrix ratio (MM), mineral maturity/crystallinity (MMC), tissue water (TW), glycosaminoglycan (GAGs), and pyridinoline (Pyd) content were determined. Outcomes were compared by ANCOVA with subject age and tissue age as covariates, and health status as a fixed factor, followed by Sidak's post-hoc testing (significance assigned to p < 0.05). Both TPTD groups increased MM compared to PMOP-PLC. While TPTD 6m had values similar to HC, TPTD 24m had higher values compared to either HC or TPTD 6m. Both TPTD groups had lower MMC values compared to PMOP-PLC and similar to HC. TPTD 6m patients had higher TW content compared to HC, while TPTD 24m had values similar to HC and lower than either PMOP-PLC or TPTD 6m. Both TPTD groups had lower GAG content compared to HC group, while TPTD 6m had higher values compared to PMOP-PLC. Finally, TPTD 6m patients had higher Pyd content compared to HC and lower compared to PMOP-PLC, while TPTD 24m had lower values compared to PMOP-PLC and TPTD 6m, and similar to HC group. The results of the present study indicate that effects of TPTD on forming trabecular bone quality indices depend on treatment duration. At the recommended length of 24 m, TPTD restores bone mineral and organic matrix quality indices (MMC, TW, Pyd content) to premenopausal healthy (HC) levels., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The bone-forming agent romosozumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits sclerostin, leading to increased bone formation and decreased resorption. The highest levels of bone formation markers in human patients are observed in the first 2 months of treatment. Histomorphometric analysis of bone biopsies from the phase 3 FRAME trial (NCT01575834) showed an early significant increase in bone formation with concomitant decreased resorption. Preclinical studies demonstrated that most new bone formation after romosozumab treatment was modeling-based bone formation (MBBF). Here we analyzed bone biopsies from FRAME to assess the effect of 2 months of romosozumab versus placebo on the surface extent of MBBF and remodeling-based bone formation (RBBF). In FRAME, postmenopausal women aged ≥55 years with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to 210 mg romosozumab or placebo sc every month for 12 months, followed by 60 mg denosumab sc every 6 months for 12 months. Participants in the bone biopsy substudy received quadruple tetracycline labeling and underwent transiliac biopsies at month 2. A total of 29 biopsies were suitable for histomorphometry. Using fluorescence microscopy, bone formation at cancellous, endocortical, and periosteal envelopes was classified based on the appearance of underlying cement lines as modeling (smooth) or remodeling (scalloped). Data were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, without multiplicity adjustment. After 2 months, the median percentage of MBBF referent to the total bone surface was significantly increased with romosozumab versus placebo on cancellous (18.0% versus 3.8%; p = 0.005) and endocortical (36.7% versus 3.0%; p = 0.001), but not on periosteal (5.0% versus 2.0%; p = 0.37) surfaces, with no significant difference in the surface extent of RBBF on all three bone surfaces. These data show that stimulation of bone formation in the first 2 months of romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis is predominately due to increased MBBF on endocortical and cancellous surfaces. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)., (© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).)

The aim of the study was to test, whether bone material strength differs between different subtypes of osteoporotic fracture and assess whether it relates to vertebral fracture severity. Cortical bone material strength index (BMSi) was measured by impact microindentation in 66 women with osteoporotic fracture and 66 age- and sex-matched controls without fracture. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers were also assessed. Vertebral fracture severity was graded by semiquantitative (SQ) grading. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the ability of BMSi to discriminate fractures. Subjects with osteoporotic fractures exhibited lower BMSi than controls (71.5 ± 7.3 vs. 76.4 ± 6.2, p < 0.001). After adjusting for age and hip BMD, a significant negative correlation was seen between BMSi and vertebral fracture severity (r 2  = 0.19, p = 0.007). A decrease of one standard deviation (SD) in BMSi was associated with increased risk of fracture (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.35, 5.10, p = 0.004). ROC curve areas under the curve (AUC) for BMSi in subjects with vertebral fracture (VF), hip fracture (HF), and non-vertebral non-hip fracture (NVNHFx), (mean; 95% CI) were 0.711 (0.608; 0.813), 0.712 (0.576; 0.843), 0.689 (0.576; 0.775), respectively. Combining BMSi and BMD provided further improvement in the discrimination of fractures with AUC values of 0.777 (0.695; 0.858), 0.789 (0.697; 0.882), and 0.821 (0.727; 0.914) for VFx, HFx, and NVNHFx, respectively. Low BMSi of the tibial cortex is associated with increased risk of all osteoporotic fractures and severity of vertebral fractures.

Adherence to oral bisphosphonates is low. A screening strategy is proposed based on the response of biochemical markers of bone turnover after 3 months of therapy. If no change is observed, the clinician should reassess the adherence to the treatment and also other potential issues with the drug., Introduction: Low adherence to oral bisphosphonates is a common problem that jeopardizes the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis. No clear screening strategy for the assessment of compliance is widely accepted in these patients., Methods: The International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Calcified Tissue Society have convened a working group to propose a screening strategy to detect a lack of adherence to these drugs. The question to answer was whether the bone turnover markers (BTMs) PINP and CTX can be used to identify low adherence in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis initiating oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. The findings of the TRIO study specifically address this question and were used as the basis for testing the hypothesis., Results: Based on the findings of the TRIO study, specifically addressing this question, the working group recommends measuring PINP and CTX at baseline and 3 months after starting therapy to check for a decrease above the least significant change (decrease of more than 38% for PINP and 56% for CTX). Detection rate for the measurement of PINP is 84%, for CTX 87% and, if variation in at least one is considered when measuring both, the level of detection is 94.5%., Conclusions: If a significant decrease is observed, the treatment can continue, but if no decrease occurs, the clinician should reassess to identify problems with the treatment, mainly low adherence., Competing Interests: A Diez-Perez is speaker or advisor for Amgen, Lilly, Merck, UCB and Active Life Sci. Bo Abrahamsen reports current institutional research grants and contracts with Novartis and UCB, past institutional research contracts with Amgen and NPS Pharmaceuticals. D. Agnusdei has a consultancy contract with Eli Lilly. Erik F Eriksen is a speaker and advisor for Amgen, Lilly, Merck, IDS and Shire. Núria Guañabens is speaker or advisor for Amgen, Lilly and Alexion Pharmaceuticals. Robert Josse is medical advisory board member and speaker honoraria and research grant: Merck,Amgen,Lilly. Daniel Prieto-Alhambra’s research group has received unrestricted grants from AMGEN S.A. Jean-Yves Reginster has consulting fees or paid advisory boards in Servier, Novartis, Negma, Lilly, Wyeth, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Merckle, Nycomed-Takeda, NPS, IBSA-Genevrier, Theramex, UCB, Asahi Kasei, Endocyte, Radius Health also has lecture fees when speaking at the invitation of the commercial sponsors: Merck Sharp and Dohme, Lilly, Rottapharm, IBSA, Genevrier, Novartis, Servier, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Merckle, Teijin, Teva, Analis, Theramex, Nycomed, NovoNordisk, Ebewee Pharma, Zodiac, Danone, Will Pharma, Amgen, PharmEvo. He has grant support from industry: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Rottapharm, Teva, Roche, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Servier, Pfizer, Theramex, Danone, Organon, Therabel, Boehringer, Chiltern, Galapagos. M. Carola Zillikens has received fee for speaking and advice from Amgen, Eli Lilly and MSD. R. Eastell has consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Chronos, GSK, Immunodiagnostic Systems, Fonterra Brands, Ono Pharma, Lilly, Bayer, Janssen Research, Alere, CL Biosystems, Teijin Pharm, D-Star, Roche Diagnostics, Inverness Medical; grant support from Amgen, Alexion, Immunodiagnostic Systems, Roche, AstraZeneca. Kim E Naylor, Maria Luisa Brandi, Cyrus Cooper, Elaine Dennison, Deborah Gold, Peyman Hadji, Mickael Hiligsmann, Robert Horne, John A Kanis, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch, René Rizzoli, and Stuart Silverman have no conflict of interest.

Prospective, controlled clinical trials in postmenopausal osteoporosis typically compare effects of an active drug with placebo in addition to vitamin D and calcium supplementation in both treatment arms. While clinical benefits are documented, the effect of this supplementation in the placebo arm and in clinical practice on bone material composition properties is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate these bone quality indices (specifically mineral/matrix, nanoporosity, glycosaminoglycan content, mineral maturity/crystallinity, and pyridinoline content) in patients that either received long-term vitamin D (400-1200IU) and calcium (1.0-1.5g) supplementation, or did not. We have analyzed by Raman microspectroscopy the bone forming trabecular surfaces of iliac crest in pre-treatment samples of a teriparatide study and the endpoint biopsies of the control arm obtained from the HORIZON trial. In general, the mineral/matrix ratio and the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content was higher while nanoporosity, (a surrogate for tissue water content), the mineral maturity/crystallinity (MMC) and the pyridinoline (Pyd) content was lower in patients without long-term supplementation. Moreover, all indices were significantly dependent on tissue age. In conclusion, vitamin D and calcium supplementation is associated with altered mineral and organic matrix properties., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Bone strength depends on the amount of bone, typically expressed as bone mineral density (BMD), determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and on bone quality. Bone quality is a multifactorial entity including bone structural and material compositional properties. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether bone material composition properties at actively-forming trabecular bone surfaces in health are dependent on subject age, and to contrast them with postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. To achieve this, we analyzed by Raman microspectroscopy iliac crest biopsy samples from healthy subjects aged 1.5 to 45.7 years, paired biopsy samples from females before and immediately after menopause aged 46.7 to 53.6 years, and biopsy samples from placebo-treated postmenopausal osteoporotic patients aged 66 to 84 years. The monitored parameters were as follows: the mineral/matrix ratio; the mineral maturity/crystallinity (MMC); nanoporosity; the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content; the lipid content; and the pyridinoline (Pyd) content. The results indicate that these bone quality parameters in healthy, actively-forming trabecular bone surfaces are dependent on subject age at constant tissue age, suggesting that with advancing age the kinetics of maturation (either accumulation, or posttranslational modifications, or both) change. For most parameters, the extrapolation of models fitted to the individual age dependence of bone in healthy individuals was in rough agreement with their values in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients, except for MMC, lipid, and Pyd content. Among these three, Pyd content showed the greatest deviation between healthy aging and disease, highlighting its potential to be used as a discriminating factor., (© 2015 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Bone turnover markers (BTM) predict bone loss and fragility fracture. Although cortical porosity and cortical thinning are important determinants of bone strength, the relationship between BTM and cortical porosity has, however, remained elusive. We therefore wanted to examine the relationship of BTM with cortical porosity and risk of non-vertebral fracture. In 211 postmenopausal women aged 54-94 years with non-vertebral fractures and 232 age-matched fracture-free controls from the Tromsø Study, Norway, we quantified femoral neck areal bone mineral density (FN aBMD), femoral subtrochanteric bone architecture, and assessed serum levels of procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX). Fracture cases exhibited higher PINP and CTX levels, lower FN aBMD, larger total and medullary cross-sectional area (CSA), thinner cortices, and higher cortical porosity of the femoral subtrochanter than controls (p≤0.01). Each SD increment in PINP and CTX was associated with 0.21-0.26 SD lower total volumetric BMD, 0.10-0.14 SD larger total CSA, 0.14-0.18 SD larger medullary CSA, 0.13-0.18 SD thinner cortices, and 0.27-0.33 SD higher porosity of the total cortex, compact cortex, and transitional zone (all p≤0.01). Moreover, each SD of higher PINP and CTX was associated with increased odds for fracture after adjustment for age, height, and weight (ORs 1.49; 95% CI, 1.20-1.85 and OR 1.22; 95% CI, 1.00-1.49, both p<0.05). PINP, but not CTX, remained associated with fracture after accounting for FN aBMD, cortical porosity or cortical thickness (OR ranging from 1.31 to 1.39, p ranging from 0.005 to 0.028). In summary, increased BTM levels are associated with higher cortical porosity, thinner cortices, larger bone size and higher odds for fracture. We infer that this is produced by increased periosteal apposition, intracortical and endocortical remodeling; and that these changes in bone architecture are predisposing to fracture., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Osteoporosis is a progressive skeletal disorder that requires long-term treatment. However, there is little guidance regarding optimal treatment duration and what the treatment discontinuation and retreatment criteria should be. Given that bisphosphonates are the most commonly prescribed class of agent for the treatment of osteoporosis, we reviewed the long-term data relating to these therapies and discussed the considerations for using bisphosphonates in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis., Methods: A PubMed search, using the search terms 'bisphosphonate', 'postmenopausal osteoporosis' and 'long term' and/or 'extension' was conducted in January 2013. Results from nine controlled studies that prospectively assessed alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate or zoledronic acid in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were reviewed., Findings: Clinical studies in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis showed that long-term use of bisphosphonates resulted in persistent antifracture and bone mineral density (BMD) increasing effects beyond 3 years of treatment. No unexpected adverse events were identified in these studies and the long-term tolerability profiles of bisphosphonates remain favorable. Data from the withdrawal extension studies of alendronate and zoledronic acid also showed that residual fracture benefits were seen in patients who discontinued treatment for 3 to 5 years after an initial 3- to 5-year treatment period. BMD monitoring and fracture risk assessments should be conducted regularly to determine whether treatment could be stopped or should be reinitiated. Patients exhibiting T-scores<-2.5 or who have suffered a new fracture while on treatment should continue treatment, while patients with T-scores>-2.5 could be considered for discontinuation of active treatment while undergoing continued monitoring of their bone health. The duration and potential discontinuation of treatment should be personalized for individual patients based on their response to treatment, fracture risk and comorbidities., (© 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The last 25 years have seen the development of a plethora of new, effective agents for the treatment of osteoporosis. These agents reduce the risk of spine fractures by up to 70%, hip fractures by 40-50% and non-vertebral fractures by up to 50-80%. Amino-bisphosphonates, taken orally or intravenously, remain the dominant treatment modalities for osteoporosis. These so-called anti-resorptive or anti-catabolic agents stabilize the skeleton and reduce fracture risk in osteoporotic as well as osteopenic individuals. A monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand, Denosumab, constitutes a new anti-resorptive agent recently approved worldwide. In younger postmenopausal women, low-dose estrogen or estrogen/progestin still has a place for short-term (up to 5 years) preservation of bone mass, especially in women with menopausal symptoms. Likewise, selective estrogen receptor modulators should be considered in younger postmenopausal women, especially those at increased risk of breast cancer. Anabolic (bone forming) regimens, of which parathyroid hormone is the only agent currently available, aid in the build up of new bone, increase bone mass and improve bone architecture. In cancellous bone, 30-60% increases of bone mass have been documented, but cortical bone thickness also increases. These improvements lead to profound reduction in fracture rates in both the axial and appendicular skeleton. Owing to cost and the need for parenteral administration, in most countries these agents are reserved for severe osteoporosis with multiple fractures., (© 2012 The Authors Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica © 2012 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Unlabelled: Once-yearly administration of intravenous zoledronic acid for 3 years in humans affects the kinetics of matrix filling in by mineral, independent of bone turnover., Introduction: Yearly 5-mg infusions of zoledronic acid (ZOL) for 3 years have shown pronounced antifracture efficacy. The purpose of the present study was to test whether ZOL affects the kinetics of forming bone material properties maturation., Methods: Iliac crest biopsies from the HORIZON-PFT clinical trial were analyzed by Raman microspectroscopy in actively bone-forming surfaces as a function of tissue age in trabecular and osteonal bone, to determine ZOL's effect on bone material quality indices maturation kinetics., Results: Mineral/matrix ratio increased in both groups as a function of tissue age, at both osteonal- and trabecular-forming surfaces; ZOL exhibiting the greatest increase in the trabecular surfaces only. The proteoglycan content showed a dependency on tissue age in both trabecular and osteonal surfaces, with ZOL exhibiting lower values in the tissue age 8-22 days in the trabecular surfaces. Mineral crystallinity (crystallite length and thickness) showed a dependence on tissue age, with ZOL exhibiting lower crystallite length compared with placebo only in the 8- to 22-day-old tissue at trabecular surfaces, while crystal thickness was lower in the 1- to 5-day-old tissue at both osteonal and trabecular surfaces., Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that once-yearly administration of intravenous ZOL for 3 years in humans does not exert any adverse effects on the evolution of bone material properties at actively forming osteonal and trabecular surfaces, while it may have a beneficial effect on the progression of the mineral-to-matrix ratio and mineral maturity bone quality indices.

Replacement therapy with estrogen and progestogen (HT) or estrogen alone (ET) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMS) still constitute valuable additions to the range of osteoporosis treatments available. Due to the diverse action on a wide variety of organs, HT/ET has the capacity to improve quality of life in most postmenopausal women,- more than other more specific osteoporosis treatments. The initial optimism associated with HRT 20-30 years ago was reduced considerably after the HT arm of WHI was stopped prematurely due to safety concerns. Later analyses of the WHI study have, however, tempered the negative messages emerging from the first publication in 2002. HT/ET still constitutes a first line choice for prevention of bone loss and fracture in the early postmenopausal period for a period of 5 years. However, in women with low risk of adverse events classically associated with HT/ET newer analyses show that treatment can be continued with an acceptable risk benefit ratio. These analyses have also highlighted the negative impact of progestogens on breast cancer risk an adverse effects on the cardiovascular system. Newer guidelines therefore suggest that a combination of a progestogen IUD and transdermal estrogen seems to be the best alternative for long term treatment. This combination minimizes cardiovascular safety concerns by avoiding the negative impact of first pass metabolism in the liver seen with oral compounds and minimizes exposure to progestogens. SERMS are valuable alternatives, particularly in osteopenic women (t-score -1,0 to -2,5) at increased risk of breast cancer, but their general lack of anti fracture efficacy towards non vertebral fractures limits their use in women at high risk of osteoporotic fracture.

Osteoporosis may be a lifelong condition. Robust data regarding the efficacy and safety of both long-term osteoporosis therapy and therapy discontinuation are therefore important. A paucity of clinical trial data regarding the long-term antifracture efficacy of osteoporosis therapies necessitates the use of surrogate endpoints in discussions surrounding long-term use and/or discontinuation. Long-term treatment (beyond 3-4 years) may produce further increases in bone mineral density (BMD) or BMD stability, depending on the specific treatment and the skeletal site. Bisphosphonates, when discontinued, are associated with a prolonged reduction in bone turnover markers (BTMs), with a very gradual increase to pretreatment levels within 3 to 60 months of treatment cessation, depending on the bisphosphonate used and the prior duration of therapy. In contrast, with nonbisphosphonate antiresorptive agents, such as estrogen and denosumab, BTMs rebound to above pretreatment values within months of discontinuation. The pattern of BTM change is generally mirrored by a more or less rapid decrease in BMD. Although the prolonged effect of some bisphosphonates on BTMs and BMD may contribute to residual benefit on bone strength, it may also raise safety concerns. Adequately powered postdiscontinuation fracture studies and conclusive evidence on maintenance or loss of fracture benefit is lacking for bisphosphonates. Similarly, the effects of rapid reversal of bone turnover upon discontinuation of denosumab on fracture risk remain unknown. Ideally, studies evaluating the effects of long-term treatment and treatment discontinuation should be designed to provide head-to-head "offset" data between bisphosphonates and nonbisphosphonate antiresorptive agents. In the absence of this, a clinical recommendation for physicians may be to periodically assess the benefits/risks of continuation versus discontinuation versus alternative management strategies., (Copyright © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Background: Treatment with bisphosphonates reduces the risk of new fractures and is the treatment of choice for osteoporosis. Denosumab inhibits bone resorption via a different mechanism than bisphosphonates, and is a new option in the treatment of osteoporosis. In this paper we give an overview of the mode of action and clinical effects., Material and Methods: The paper is based on a non-systematic literature search in Pubmed/Medline., Results: Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody to receptor-activated nuclear factor kappa B (RANKL), a member of the TNF family that is formed in the osteoblast. Binding to RANKL results in reduced recruitment and activity of osteoclasts. Denosumab 60 mg given subcutaneously every six months is shown to inhibit bone resorption to a greater degree than bisphosphonates. In a three-year study of 7,868 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, a reduction in the relative risk of vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures compared to placebo was found (68. 20 and 40 %, correspondingly). In the clinical trials with denosumab, the safety profile was similar to placebo, except for a slightly higher incidence of cellulitis and exanthema. Denosumab has also shown promising skeletal effects in the treatment of cancer and rheumatoid arthritis., Interpretation: Treatment with denosumab has an effect on postmenopausal osteoporosis and may be an alternative to treatment with bisphosphonates. There are few adverse effects and it is simple to administer.

Clinical data suggest concomitant therapy with bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone (PTH) may blunt the anabolic effect of PTH; rodent models suggest that infrequently administered bisphosphonates may interact differently. To evaluate the effects of combination therapy with an intravenous infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg and daily subcutaneous recombinant human (rh)PTH(1-34) (teriparatide) 20 µg versus either agent alone on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers, we conducted a 1-year multicenter, multinational, randomized, partial double-blinded, controlled trial. 412 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (mean age 65 ± 9 years) were randomized to a single infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg plus daily subcutaneous teriparatide 20 µg (n = 137), zoledronic acid alone (n = 137), or teriparatide alone (n = 138). The primary endpoint was percentage increase in lumbar spine BMD (assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) at 52 weeks versus baseline. Secondary endpoints included change in BMD at the spine at earlier time points and at the total hip, trochanter, and femoral neck at all time points. At week 52, lumbar spine BMD had increased 7.5%, 7.0%, and 4.4% in the combination, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid groups, respectively (p < .001 for combination and teriparatide versus zoledronic acid). In the combination group, spine BMD increased more rapidly than with either agent alone (p < .001 versus both teriparatide and zoledronic acid at 13 and 26 weeks). Combination therapy increased total-hip BMD more than teriparatide alone at all times (all p < .01) and more than zoledronic acid at 13 weeks (p < .05), with final 52-week increments of 2.3%, 1.1%, and 2.2% in the combination, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid groups, respectively. With combination therapy, bone formation (assessed by serum N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen [PINP]) increased from 0 to 4 weeks, declined minimally from 4 to 8 weeks, and then rose throughout the trial, with levels above baseline from 6 to 12 months. Bone resorption (assessed by serum β-C-telopeptide of type I collagen [β-CTX]) was markedly reduced with combination therapy from 0 to 8 weeks (a reduction of similar magnitude to that seen with zoledronic acid alone), followed by a gradual increase after week 8, with levels remaining above baseline for the latter half of the year. Levels for both markers were significantly lower with combination therapy versus teriparatide alone (p < .002). Limitations of the study included its short duration, lack of endpoints beyond DXA-based BMD (e.g., quantitative computed tomography and finite-element modeling for bone strength), lack of teriparatide placebo, and insufficient power for fracture outcomes. We conclude that while teriparatide increases spine BMD more than zoledronic acid and zoledronic acid increases hip BMD more than teriparatide, combination therapy provides the largest, most rapid increments when both spine and hip sites are considered., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Zoledronic acid (ZOL), a third-generation aminobisphosphonate, showed pronounced antifracture efficacy in a phase III clinical trial [Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly-Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT)] when administered yearly (5-mg infusions of ZOL), producing significant reductions in morphometric vertebral, clinical vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures by 70%, 77%, 41%, and 25%, respectively, over a 3-year period. The purpose of this study was to analyze the biopsies obtained during the HORIZON clinical trial (152 patients, 82 ZOL and 70 placebo) by means of Raman microspectroscopy (a vibrational spectroscopic technique capable of analyzing undecalcified bone tissue with a spatial resolution of approximately 0.6 µm) to determine the effect of ZOL therapy on bone material properties (in particular mineral/matrix ratio, lamellar organization, carbonate and proteoglycan (based on spectral identification of glycosaminoglycan) content, and mineral maturity/crystallinity) at similar tissue age (based on the presence of tetracycline double labels). The results indicated that while ZOL administration increased the mineral/matrix ratio compared with placebo, it also resulted in mineral crystallites with a quality profile (based on carbonate content and maturity/crystallinity characteristics) of younger (with respect to tissue age) bone. Since the comparisons between ZOL- and placebo-treated patients were performed at similar tissue age at actively forming bone surfaces, these results suggest that ZOL may be exerting an effect on bone matrix formation in addition to its well-established antiresorptive effect, thereby contributing to its antifracture efficacy., (© 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Unlabelled: Changes in bone mineral density and bone strength following treatment with zoledronic acid (ZOL) were measured by quantitative computed analysis (QCT) or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). ZOL treatment increased spine and hip BMD vs placebo, assessed by QCT and DXA. Changes in trabecular bone resulted in increased bone strength., Introduction: To investigate bone mineral density (BMD) changes in trabecular and cortical bone, estimated by quantitative computed analysis (QCT) or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and whether zoledronic acid 5 mg (ZOL) affects bone strength., Methods: In 233 women from a randomized, controlled trial of once-yearly ZOL, lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter were assessed by DXA and QCT (baseline, Month 36). Mean percentage changes from baseline and between-treatment differences (ZOL vs placebo, t-test) were evaluated., Results: Mean between-treatment differences for lumbar spine BMD were significant by DXA (7.0%, p < 0.01) and QCT (5.7%, p < 0.0001). Between-treatment differences were significant for trabecular spine (p = 0.0017) [non-parametric test], trabecular trochanter (10.7%, p < 0.0001), total hip (10.8%, p < 0.0001), and compressive strength indices at femoral neck (8.6%, p = 0.0001), and trochanter (14.1%, p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Once-yearly ZOL increased hip and spine BMD vs placebo, assessed by QCT vs DXA. Changes in trabecular bone resulted in increased indices of compressive strength., Competing Interests: Dr. Eastell serves as a consultant, has received honoraria for speaking, and has received grant funding from Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Organon, Pfizer, and Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Lang serves as a consultant for Merck and has received grant funding from Novartis. Dr. Boonen serves as a consultant, has received honoraria for speaking, and has received grant funding from Novartis. Dr. Cummings reports no conflict of interest. Dr. Cauley has received research grants from Merck, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis and Procter & Gamble, and has received honoraria from Novartis. Dr. Horowitz was an employee of Novartis until 2003. He has no other conflict of interest. Dr. Kerzberg has no conflict of interest. Dr. Bianchi has received consulting fees from Novartis. Dr. Kendler serves on advisory boards or as a consultant for Novartis, Servier, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Wyeth and Nycomed. Dr. Leung has no conflict of interest. Dr. Man has received honoraria for speaking from Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, Merck and Novartis. Dr. Mesenbrink is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation who funded the study and owns stock in the company. Dr. Eriksen serves as a consultant and has received honoraria for speaking from Novartis. Dr. Black serves as a consultant for Nycomed and Zosano, and has research contracts with Novartis and Roche.

Annual infusions of zoledronic acid (5 mg) significantly reduced the risk of vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures in a study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and significantly reduced clinical fractures and all-cause mortality in another study of women and men who had recently undergone surgical repair of hip fracture. In this analysis, we examined whether timing of the first infusion of zoledronic acid study drug after hip fracture repair influenced the antifracture efficacy and mortality benefit observed in the study. A total of 2127 patients (1065 on active treatment and 1062 on placebo; mean age, 75 yr; 76% women and 24% men) were administered zoledronic acid or placebo within 90 days after surgical repair of an osteoporotic hip fracture and annually thereafter, with a median follow-up time of 1.9 yr. Median time to first dose after the incident hip fracture surgery was approximately 6 wk. Posthoc analyses were performed by dividing the study population into 2-wk intervals (calculated from time of first infusion in relation to surgical repair) to examine effects on BMD, fracture, and mortality. Analysis by 2-wk intervals showed a significant total hip BMD response and a consistent reduction of overall clinical fractures and mortality in patients receiving the first dose 2-wk or later after surgical repair. Clinical fracture subgroups (vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip) were also reduced, albeit with more variation and 95% CIs crossing 1 at most time points. We concluded that administration of zoledronic acid to patients suffering a low-trauma hip fracture 2 wk or later after surgical repair increases hip BMD, induces significant reductions in the risk of subsequent clinical vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures, and reduces mortality.

Intravenous bisphosphonates reduce fracture risk but have been associated in rare cases with deteriorating renal-function in cancer patients. The renal effects of zoledronic acid were assessed in osteoporotic postmenopausal women from 27 countries who received three annual infusions of zoledronic acid or a placebo in a randomized, double-blind trial. Serum creatinine, estimated creatinine clearance and urinary protein were measured before and after at least one infusion in a predefined renal safety cohort of 5035 equally divided patients. This group was compared to 7714 patients whose parameters were measured annually. Significantly more transient pre- to post-infusion increases in serum creatinine occurred in zoledronic acid than placebo-treated patients with significant elevations, relative to pre-infusion, only in the second year. All 31 zoledronic acid and 8 of 10 patients on placebo recovered their pre-infusion serum creatinine value within 12 months. No differences in mean changes in serum creatinine, estimated creatinine clearance or adverse renal events were found. We found that transient changes in renal function can occur following an annual zoledronic acid infusion but, in the long term, renal function was not different from control patients.

Background: The authors determined incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in a large, prospective three-year clinical trial of zoledronic acid in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO)., Methods: A total of 7,714 women with PMO received intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg or a placebo. No spontaneous reports of ONJ were received. An independent, blinded adjudication committee searched the trial's adverse event database by using 60 terms. On an ongoing basis, the committee reviewed the identified events, and it defined ONJ as exposed bone in the maxillofacial area with delayed healing for more than six weeks despite appropriate care., Results: One participant who received a placebo and one participant who received zoledronic acid experienced delayed healing associated with infection. Both conditions resolved after antibiotic therapy, débridement or both., Conclusion: The occurrence of ONJ is rare in a PMO population, and delayed healing of lesions can occur with and without bisphosphonate use over three years., Clinical Implications: The low incidence of ONJ must be assessed in the context of the clinical benefit of zoledronic acid therapy in reducing hip, vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in this at-risk population. There is no evidence to suggest that healthy patients with osteoporosis who are receiving bisphosphonates require any special treatment beyond routine dental care or to support altering standard treatment practices.

Unlabelled: In a substudy of the HORIZON pivotal fracture trial, in which yearly intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg was found to significantly reduce risk of various fracture types in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, 152 patients underwent bone biopsy. Zoledronic acid reduced bone turnover by 63% and preserved bone structure and volume, with evidence of ongoing bone remodeling in 99% of biopsies obtained., Introduction: In the HORIZON pivotal fracture trial (PFT), enrolling 7,736 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, three annual intravenous infusions of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (5 mg) significantly reduced morphometric vertebral, clinical vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures by 70%, 77%, 41%, and 25%, respectively. Whereas 79% of patients received zoledronic acid/placebo only (stratum I, n = 6,113), 21% received concomitant treatment with other antiresorptive drugs, excluding other bisphosphonates, PTH, and strontium (stratum II, n = 1,652)., Materials and Methods: To determine effects on bone remodeling and bone architecture, iliac crest bone biopsies were obtained in 152 patients on active treatment or placebo at 3 yr after double tetracycline labeling. In five patients, only qualitative histology was performed, leaving 147 biopsy cores (79 on active treatment and 68 on placebo) for microCT analysis and histomorphometry., Results: Analysis of bone structure by microCT revealed higher trabecular bone volume (BV/TV) in the zoledronic acid group (median, 16.6% versus 12.8%; p = 0.020). In addition, patients treated with zoledronic acid exhibited higher trabecular numbers (p = 0.008), decreased trabecular separation (p = 0.011), and a trend toward improvement in connectivity density (p = 0.062), all indicating better preservation of trabecular structure after treatment with zoledronic acid. Qualitative analysis revealed presence of tetracycline label in 81 of 82 biopsies from patients on zoledronic acid and all 70 biopsies from placebo patients, indicative of continued bone remodeling. No bone pathology was observed. Zoledronic acid induced a 63% median (71% mean) reduction of the activation frequency (Ac.f; p < 0.0001) and reduced mineralizing surface (MS/BS; p < 0.0001) and volume referent bone formation rate (BFR/BV) versus placebo, indicating reduced bone turnover. Mineral appositional rate was higher in the zoledronic acid group (p = 0.0002), suggesting improved osteoblast function compared with placebo. Mineralization lag time was similar in the two groups, whereas osteoid volume (OV/BV; p < 0.0001) and osteoid thickness (O.Th; p = 0.0094) were lower in zoledronic acid-treated patients, indicating normal osteoid formation and mineralization of newly formed bone. Concomitant administration of other antiresorptive osteoporosis therapies (e.g., raloxifene, tamoxifen, tibolone, ipriflavone) did not significantly alter the tissue level response to zoledronic acid., Conclusions: Annual dosing for 3 yr with zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously resulted in a median 63% (mean, 71%) reduction of bone turnover and preservation of bone structure and mass without any signs of adynamic bone. Concomitant treatment with other osteoporosis therapies did not significantly affect the bone response to zoledronic acid.

Unlabelled: In a 5-year study involving 119 postmenopausal women, zoledronic acid 4 mg given once-yearly for 2, 3 or 5 years was well tolerated with no evidence of excessive bone turnover reduction or any safety signals. BMD increased significantly. Bone turnover markers decreased from baseline and were maintained within premenopausal reference ranges., Introduction: After completion of the core study, two consecutive, 2-year, open-label extensions investigated the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid 4 mg over 5 years in postmenopausal osteoporosis., Methods: In the core study, patients received 1 to 4 mg zoledronic acid or placebo. In the first extension, most patients received 4 mg per year and then patients entered the second extension and received 4 mg per year or calcium only. Patients were divided into three subgroups according to years of active treatment received (2, 3 or 5 years). Changes in BMD and bone turnover markers (bone ALP and CTX-I) were assessed., Results: All subgroups showed substantial increases in BMD and decreases in bone markers. By the end of the core study, 37.5% of patients revealed a suboptimal reduction (< 30%) of bone ALP levels. After subsequent study drug administration during the extensions, there was no evidence of progressive reduction of bone turnover markers. Furthermore, increased marker levels after treatment discontinuation demonstrates preservation of bone remodelling capacity., Conclusions: This study showed that zoledronic acid 4 mg once-yearly was well tolerated and effective in reducing biomarkers over 5 years. Detailed analysis of bone marker changes, however, suggests that this drug regimen causes insufficient reduction of remodelling activity in one third of patients.

Background: A single infusion of intravenous zoledronic acid decreases bone turnover and improves bone density at 12 months in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. We assessed the effects of annual infusions of zoledronic acid on fracture risk during a 3-year period., Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 3889 patients (mean age, 73 years) were randomly assigned to receive a single 15-minute infusion of zoledronic acid (5 mg) and 3876 were assigned to receive placebo at baseline, at 12 months, and at 24 months; the patients were followed until 36 months. Primary end points were new vertebral fracture (in patients not taking concomitant osteoporosis medications) and hip fracture (in all patients). Secondary end points included bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and safety outcomes., Results: Treatment with zoledronic acid reduced the risk of morphometric vertebral fracture by 70% during a 3-year period, as compared with placebo (3.3% in the zoledronic-acid group vs. 10.9% in the placebo group; relative risk, 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.38) and reduced the risk of hip fracture by 41% (1.4% in the zoledronic-acid group vs. 2.5% in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.83). Nonvertebral fractures, clinical fractures, and clinical vertebral fractures were reduced by 25%, 33%, and 77%, respectively (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Zoledronic acid was also associated with a significant improvement in bone mineral density and bone metabolism markers. Adverse events, including change in renal function, were similar in the two study groups. However, serious atrial fibrillation occurred more frequently in the zoledronic acid group (in 50 vs. 20 patients, P<0.001)., Conclusions: A once-yearly infusion of zoledronic acid during a 3-year period significantly reduced the risk of vertebral, hip, and other fractures. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00049829.), (Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Introduction: Bone microarchitecture, a component of bone strength, is generally measured on transiliac bone biopsy samples. The objective of this study was to determine whether assessment of four grades of vertebral fracture severity could serve as a noninvasive surrogate marker for trabecular bone volume and microarchitecture., Methods: Baseline vertebral fracture severity was determined by semiquantitative assessment of spine radiographs from 190 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Bone-structure indices were obtained by 2D histomorphometry and 3D microcomputed tomography (CT) analyses. Significance of differences was determined after adjusting for age, height, and lumbar spine bone mineral density., Results: There were significant (P < 0.05) trends in decreasing bone volume, trabecular number, and connectivity, and increasing trabecular separation with greater vertebral fracture severity. Histomorphometric bone volume was 25 and 36% lower (P < 0.05) in women with moderate and severe fractures than in women with no fractures, respectively. Compared with women without fractures, women with mild, moderate, and severe fractures had lower (P < 0.05) microCT bone volume (23, 30, and 51%, respectively)., Conclusions: Microarchitectural deterioration was progressively worse in women with increasing severity of vertebral fractures. We conclude that assessment of vertebral fracture severity is an important clinical tool to evaluate the severity of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Unlabelled: Transiliac bone biopsies were obtained from 55 women treated with teriparatide or placebo for 12-24 months. We report direct evidence that modeling bone formation at quiescent surfaces was present only in teriparatide-treated patients and bone formation at remodeling sites was higher with teriparatide than placebo., Introduction: Recombinant teriparatide [human PTH(1-34)], a bone formation agent for the treatment of osteoporosis when given once daily subcutaneously, increases biochemical markers of bone turnover and activation frequency in histomorphometry studies., Materials and Methods: We studied the mechanisms underlying this bone-forming action of teriparatide at the basic multicellular unit by the appearance of cement lines, a method used to directly classify surfaces as modeling or remodeling osteons, and by the immunolocalization of IGF-I and IGF-II. Transiliac bone biopsies were obtained from 55 postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide 20 or 40 microg or placebo for 12-24 months (median, 19.8 months) in the Fracture Prevention Trial., Results: A dose-dependent relationship was observed in modeling and mixed remodeling/modeling trabecular hemiosteons. Trabecular and endosteal hemiosteon mean wall thicknesses were significantly higher in both teriparatide groups than in placebo. There was a dose-dependent relationship in IGF-II immunoreactive staining at all bone envelopes studied. The greater local IGF-II presence after treatment with teriparatide may play a key role in stimulating bone formation., Conclusions: Direct evidence is presented that 12-24 months of teriparatide treatment induced modeling bone formation at quiescent surfaces and resulted in greater bone formation at remodeling sites, relative to placebo.

Unlabelled: We compared combination treatment with teriparatide plus raloxifene with teriparatide alone in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in a 6-month double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that measured biochemical markers of bone turnover and BMD. Markers of bone formation and spine BMD increased similarly with teriparatide alone and combination therapy. However, combination therapy induced a significantly smaller increase in bone resorption versus teriparatide alone and significantly increased total hip BMD versus baseline., Introduction: The effects of combining two approved treatments for osteoporosis with different modes of action were examined by comparing teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] monotherapy with combination teriparatide and raloxifene therapy., Materials and Methods: A 6-month randomized, double-blind trial comparing teriparatide plus raloxifene (n = 69) versus teriparatide plus placebo (n = 68) was conducted in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis., Results: Bone formation (N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen [PINP]) increased similarly in both treatment groups. However, the increase in bone resorption (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [CTx]) in the combination group was significantly smaller than in the teriparatide-alone group (p = 0.015). Lumbar spine BMD significantly increased 5.19 +/- 0.67% from baseline in the teriparatide-alone group. In the combination group, lumbar spine (6.19 +/- 0.65%), femoral neck (2.23 +/- 0.64%), and total hip (2.31 +/- 0.56%) BMD significantly increased from baseline to study endpoint, and the increase in total hip BMD was significantly greater than in the teriparatide-alone group (p = 0.04). In the teriparatide-alone group, mean serum calcium levels increased from baseline to endpoint (0.30 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p < 0.001), whereas mean serum phosphate remained unchanged. In the combination group, mean serum calcium was unchanged, and mean serum phosphate decreased (-0.20 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p < 0.001) from baseline to endpoint. Changes in serum calcium (p < 0.001) and phosphate (p < 0.004) were significantly different between treatment groups. The safety profile of combination therapy was similar to teriparatide alone., Conclusions: Combination therapy increased bone formation to a similar degree as teriparatide alone. However, the increase in bone resorption was significantly less and total hip BMD significantly increased for combination therapy compared with teriparatide alone. Combination treatment with raloxifene may thus enhance the bone forming effects of teriparatide. Further studies over longer treatment duration that include fracture endpoints are necessary to fully ascertain the clinical significance of combination raloxifene plus teriparatide therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Unlabelled: The unique noninvasive MRI technique was used to assess trabecular microarchitecture at multiple skeletal sites in 91 postmenopausal osteoporotic women receiving nasal spray salmon calcitonin (CT-NS) or placebo over 2 years. In the distal radius and lower trochanter of the hip, individuals treated with CT-NS exhibited significant preservation of trabecular bone microarchitecture compared with placebo, where significant deterioration was shown. MRI analyses of os calcis or microCT/histomorphometric analyses of bone biopsies did not reveal consistent differences in architecture between CT-NS and placebo., Introduction: It is postulated that the reduction in osteoporotic fracture risk in response to certain antiresorptive osteoporosis therapies is caused less by effects on bone quantity than on bone quality (specifically trabecular microarchitecture). To test this hypothesis, the QUEST study was conducted to assess the effects of nasal spray salmon calcitonin (CT-NS) or placebo on parameters of trabecular microarchitecture at multiple skeletal sites using noninvasive MRI technology and iliac crest bone biopsies by microCT/histomorphometry., Materials and Methods: Ninety-one postmenopausal osteoporotic women were followed for 2 years (n = 46 for CT-NS, n = 45 for placebo); all women received 500 mg calcium daily. MRI measurements at distal radius, hip (T2 relaxation time [T2*]), and os calcis (obtained yearly), iliac crest bone biopsies with 2D histomorphometry and 3D microCT (obtained at study onset and conclusion), DXA-BMD at spine/hip/wrist/os calcis (obtained yearly), and markers of bone turnover (obtained at 2-week to 12-month intervals) were analyzed, with an analysis of covariance model used to assess treatment effect for parameters of interest., Results and Conclusions: MRI assessment of trabecular microarchitecture at individual regions of the distal radius revealed significant improvement, or preservation (no significant loss), in the CT-NS-treated group compared with significant deterioration in the placebo control group, as reflected in apparent BV/TV (p < 0.03), apparent trabecular number (p < 0.01), and apparent trabecular spacing (p < 0.01). Also, at the hip, the CT-NS group exhibited preservation of trabecular microarchitecture at the lower trochanter (p < 0.05) as determined by T2* MRI technology. Significant deterioration of trabecular bone architecture was noted in the placebo group at the femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and lower trochanteric sites. Apart from a significant increase in apparent trabecular number in the CT-NS group, significant changes within or between groups were not noted at the os calcis. Combined microCT/histomorphometric analysis of iliac crest bone biopsies did not reveal significant differences between treated and placebo groups. In the CT-NS group, regardless of the change in BMD (gain or loss) at the spine, hip, or distal radius, preservation of parameters of trabecular microarchitecture was noted, whereas in the placebo group, regardless of the change in BMD (gain or loss) at the spine, hip, or distal radius, loss or preservation was noted; however, changes in DXA/BMD (of the spine, hip, wrist, os calcis) between CT-NS and placebo groups were not significant. Serum C-telopeptide (S-CTx), a specific bone resorption marker, was reduced by 22.5% at 24 months (p = 0.056). The results of the QUEST study suggest therapeutic benefit of CT-NS compared with placebo in maintaining trabecular microarchitecture at multiple skeletal sites and support the use of MRI technology for assessment of trabecular microarchitecture in clinical research trials. However, the results also highlight site specific differences in response to antiresorptive therapies and the importance of sufficiently large sampling volumes (areas) to obtain reliable assessment of bone architecture.

Context: Evidence suggests that both bone mineral density and bone quality should be taken into account when assessing bone strength and fracture risk. Bone quality is a multifactor entity, of which bone architecture and material properties are two important components. Matrix mineralization, hydroxyapatite characteristics, and collagen cross-link ratio are key determinants of material properties. Fourier transform infrared imaging (FTIRI) yields data on these characteristics from bone sections., Objective: We sought to determine collagen cross-link ratios and matrix mineralization of bone from patients randomized to teriparatide [recombinant human PTH (1-34)] treatment using FTIRI., Design: The Fracture Prevention Trial was randomized, double blind, and placebo-controlled., Setting: The trial was conducted at global clinical research centers., Patients: Patients consisted of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis., Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive daily sc injections of placebo (n = 12) or 20 microg (n = 13) or 40 microg (n = 13) teriparatide. Biopsies were obtained after 12 months of treatment or at the end of treatment (range, 19-24 months for end of treatment paired biopsies)., Main Outcome Measures: Biopsies were analyzed by FTIRI to determine the matrix mineralization (mineral to matrix), mineral crystallinity, and collagen cross-link ratio (pyridinoline/dehydrodihydroxylysinonorleucine) with a spatial resolution of approximately 6.3 microm., Results: Patients administered teriparatide 20 and 40 microg/d exhibited significantly lower matrix mineralization, mineral crystallinity, and collagen cross-link ratio when compared with placebo., Conclusions: These findings indicate that the bone-forming effect of teriparatide results in bone with a molecular profile reminiscent of younger bone.

Context: Biochemical markers of bone turnover may reflect bone structure during anabolic treatment., Objective: The objective was to evaluate associations between changes in biochemical markers and structural and dynamic bone parameters during teriparatide treatment., Design: This study was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled fracture prevention trial, with 20-month median treatment duration for biopsy subset., Setting: The trial was conducted at 11 clinical study sites., Patients: Sixty-one postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who had paired transiliac biopsy specimens participated in the study., Interventions: Once-daily sc injections of either placebo or teriparatide (20 or 40 microg) were administered., Main Outcome Measures: The study measured: 1) serum and urinary biochemical markers of bone formation [bone alkaline phosphatase and procollagen I C-terminal propeptide (PICP)] and resorption (N-telopeptide and deoxypyridinoline); and 2) structural and dynamic analyses of bone biopsies, including two-dimensional (2D) histomorphometry and three-dimensional (3D) micro-computed tomography evaluations measured at baseline (n = 57) and 12 (n = 21) or 22 (n = 36) months., Results: U-N-telopeptide/creatinine and serum-PICP correlated with bone structure and dynamic indices at baseline, respectively. Changes in bone alkaline phosphatase at 1 month correlated with changes at 22 months in 2D wall thickness (r = 0.73; P = 0.001), trabecular bone volume (trabecular bone volume per total volume, BV/TV) (r = 0.58; P < 0.05), marrow star volume (r = -0.51; P = 0.05); 3D trabecular thickness (r = 0.49; P < 0.05), and BV/TV (r = 0.54; P < 0.05). Changes in PICP at 1 month correlated with changes in wall thickness (r = 0.60; P = 0.01), and 2D BV/TV (r = 0.51; P < 0.05) at 22 months. Changes in markers at 6 or 12 months were not associated with changes in structural or dynamic parameters., Conclusions: Early (1-month) changes in biochemical markers of bone formation, but not resorption, correlated with improvements in bone structure after 22 months of teriparatide therapy.

Unlabelled: An 18-month randomized double-blind study was conducted in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis to compare the effects of once-daily teriparatide 20 microg with alendronate 10 mg on bone histomorphometry. Biopsies were obtained from 42 patients. Indices of bone formation were significantly higher after 6 or 18 months of teriparatide compared with alendronate treatment., Introduction: Alendronate and teriparatide increased BMD, assessed by DXA, by different mechanisms of action, supported by changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to explore the differential effects of these two osteoporosis treatments at the bone tissue level by examining bone histomorphometric parameters of bone turnover after either 6 or 18 months of treatment., Materials and Methods: Patients were a cohort from a randomized parallel double-blind study conducted to compare the effects of once-daily teriparatide 20 microg and alendronate 10 mg in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Transiliac crest bone biopsies were obtained after tetracycline double labeling from 42 patients treated for 6 months (n = 23) or 18 months (n = 14); 5 additional patients were biopsied from contralateral sides at 6 and 18 months. Biopsy specimens adequate for quantitative analysis were analyzed by 2D histomorphometry from 17 patients at 6 months (teriparatide, n = 8; alendronate, n = 9) and 15 patients at 18 months (teriparatide, n = 8; alendronate, n = 7). Data were analyzed by two-sample tests., Results: Histomorphometric indices of bone formation were significantly and markedly greater in the teriparatide group than in the alendronate group at 6 and 18 months, whereas indices of bone resorption were only significantly greater in the teriparatide group than in the alendronate group at 6 months. Bone formation and activation frequency were significantly lower at 18 months compared with 6 months in the teriparatide group, returning to levels comparable with untreated postmenopausal women. In the teriparatide group, the peak in histomorphometric bone formation indices coincided with peak levels for N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen, a biochemical marker of bone formation. The degree of mineralization was lower at 18 months than at 6 months with treatment in both groups but was not different between groups., Conclusions: These results confirm the opposite mechanisms of action of teriparatide and alendronate on bone remodeling and confirm the bone formation effect of teriparatide.

Introduction: We evaluated effects of teriparatide (rDNA origin) injection [teriparatide, rhPTH (1-34), TPTD] on hip structure among a subset 558 postmenopausal women enrolled in the Fracture Prevention Trial., Methods: Patients were randomized to once-daily, self-administered subcutaneous injections of placebo (N = 189), teriparatide 20 mug (TPTD20; N = 186), or 40 mug (TPTD40; N = 183) for a median of 20 months. Repeated dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) hip scans were analyzed with the Hip Structure Analysis (HSA) program to derive structural geometry., Results and Conclusions: There were no significant differences in age or body size between groups at baseline, 1 year, or study termination. At the femoral neck, teriparatide increased bone mass and improved bone geometric strength in both treatment groups compared to the placebo group, with the response being dose-related. The mean difference (95% CI) in bone cross-sectional area (CSA) in the TPTD20 was 3.5% (1.8% to 5.3%), and 6.3% (4.5% to 8.2%) in TPTD40 at study termination, compared to placebo controls. Teriparatide treatment increased bending strength, with the mean difference in section modulus being 3.6% (1.4% to 5.8%) and 6.8% (4.6% to 9.1%) greater in the TPTD20 and TPTD40 groups, respectively. Compared to placebo, local cortical instability characterized by the buckling ratio decreased by 5.5% (3.5% to 7.5%) and 8.6% (6.6% to 10.5%) in the TPTD20 and TPTD40 groups, respectively, during the study period. The changes at the intertrochanteric region were comparable to those at the narrow neck although between-group differences were slightly smaller. Except for an inconsequential (1%) improvement in section modulus in TPTD20, teriparatide effects did not reach significance at the femoral shaft. In conclusion, teriparatide treatment improved axial and bending strength, and increased cortical thickness and stability at the femoral neck and intertrochanteric region. Teriparatide treatment effects were not apparent at the purely cortical femoral shaft.

Teriparatide is the recombinant human N-terminal fragment (1-34) of endogenous human parathyroid hormone, and it is the first bone anabolic agent for the treatment of osteoporosis. When given as once-daily subcutaneous injections, teriparatide can reverse the course of osteoporosis by stimulating formation of new bone and restoring lost architecture. Teriparatide (20 microg) treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women rapidly increased markers of bone formation and reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures by 65% and of nonvertebral fragility fractures by 53%. In addition, treatment with this compound increased spine bone mineral density by 10% and hip bone mineral density by 3% at study endpoint. Teriparatide is well tolerated and is not associated with any serious side effects. The compound has been approved in Europe and in the US for the treatment of osteoporosis. Duration of treatment is 18-24 months and the dose does not need to be adjusted for age or gender.

HRT is an effective prophylaxis against postmenopausal bone loss. Infrared imaging of paired iliac crest biopsies obtained at baseline and after 2 years of HRT therapy demonstrate an effect on the mineral crystallinity and collagen cross-links that may affect bone quality. Several studies have demonstrated that hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) is an effective prophylaxis against postmenopausal bone loss, although the underlying mechanisms are still debated. Infrared spectroscopy has been used previously for analyzing bone mineral crystallinity and three-dimensional structures of collagen and other proteins. In the present study, the technique of Fourier transform infrared microscopic imaging (FTIRI) was used to investigate the effect of estrogen on bone quality (arbitrarily defined as mineral/matrix ratio, mineral crystallinity/maturity, and relative ratio of collagen cross-links [pyridinoline/ deH-DHLNL]) at the ultrastructural level, in mineralized, thin tissue sections from double (before and after administration of HRT regimen; cyclic estrogen and progestogen [norethisterone acetate]) iliac crest biopsy specimens from 10 healthy, early postmenopausal women who were not on any medication with known influence on calcium metabolism. FTIRI allows the analysis of undemineralized thin tissue sections (each image analyzes a 400 x 400 microm2 area with a spatial resolution of approximately 6.3 mm). For each bone quality variable considered, the after-treatment data exhibited an increase in the mean value, signifying definite changes in bone properties at the molecular level after HRT treatment. Furthermore, these findings are consistent with suppressed osteoclastic activity.

The effects of 3 years of oral risedronate treatment on bone quality and remodeling were assessed in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Transiliac bone biopsies were obtained at baseline and after treatment with placebo or risedronate 5 mg/day in 55 women (placebo, n = 27; risedronate 5 mg, n = 28); these pairs of samples allowed comparison of treatment effects vs. both baseline values and between treatment groups. A further 15 women (placebo, n = 6; risedronate 5 mg, n = 9) had measurements from a posttreatment biopsy, but not from a baseline biopsy. Samples were examined for qualitative changes (e.g., osteomalacia, peritrabecular fibrosis, and woven bone); no histological abnormalities were found to be associated with treatment. Among women with both baseline and posttreatment biopsies, risedronate-treated women experienced a moderate and expected reduction from baseline in bone turnover, which was reflected in mean decreases in mineralizing surface of 58% and in activation frequency of 47%. Histomorphometrical parameters indicated that bone formation rate decreased significantly from baseline with risedronate treatment, reflecting a decrease in bone turnover; bone mineralization was normal following treatment. Basic multicellular unit (BMU) balance tended to improve in the risedronate-treated women, whereas it tended to worsen in the placebo-treated women, although these changes were not statistically significant. There were no significant changes in structural parameters with treatment. The effects of 3 years of risedronate treatment on bone histology and histomorphometry reflect the antiresorptive mechanism of action, and are consistent with the antifracture efficacy and favorable bone safety profile demonstrated in large clinical trials.

Background: Once-daily injections of parathyroid hormone or its amino-terminal fragments increase bone formation and bone mass without causing hypercalcemia, but their effects on fractures are unknown., Methods: We randomly assigned 1637 postmenopausal women with prior vertebral fractures to receive 20 or 40 microg of parathyroid hormone (1-34) or placebo, administered subcutaneously by the women daily. We obtained vertebral radiographs at base line and at the end of the study (median duration of observation, 21 months) and performed serial measurements of bone mass by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry., Results: New vertebral fractures occurred in 14 percent of the women in the placebo group and in 5 percent and 4 percent, respectively, of the women in the 20-microg and 40-microg parathyroid hormone groups; the respective relative risks of fracture in the 20-microg and 40-microg groups, as compared with the placebo group, were 0.35 and 0.31 (95 percent confidence intervals, 0.22 to 0.55 and 0.19 to 0.50). New nonvertebral fragility fractures occurred in 6 percent of the women in the placebo group and in 3 percent of those in each parathyroid hormone group (relative risk, 0.47 and 0.46, respectively [95 percent confidence intervals, 0.25 to 0.88 and 0.25 to 0.861). As compared with placebo, the 20-microg and 40-microg doses of parathyroid hormone increased bone mineral density by 9 and 13 more percentage points in the lumbar spine and by 3 and 6 more percentage points in the femoral neck; the 40-microg dose decreased bone mineral density at the shaft of the radius by 2 more percentage points. Both doses increased total-body bone mineral by 2 to 4 more percentage points than did placebo. Parathyroid hormone had only minor side effects (occasional nausea and headache)., Conclusions: Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with parathyroid hormone (1-34) decreases the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; increases vertebral, femoral, and total-body bone mineral density; and is well tolerated. The 40-microg dose increased bone mineral density more than the 20-microg dose but had similar effects on the risk of fracture and was more likely to have side effects.

Both hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and bisphosphonates are efficacious in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Combined therapy with bisphosphonate and HRT is likely to be used in clinical practice, and limited data are available regarding its efficacy and safety. This was a 1-yr, double blind, placebo-controlled study in which 524 postmenopausal women received daily treatment with conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg) alone or in combination with risedronate (5 mg). Women who had not undergone hysterectomy received medroxyprogesterone acetate (up to 5 mg, daily or cyclically) at the discretion of the investigator. The primary efficacy end point was the percent change from baseline in mean lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 1 yr. Changes in BMD at the proximal femur and forearm, bone turnover markers, and histology and histomorphometry were also assessed. At 12 months, significant (P < 0.05) increases from baseline in lumbar spine BMD were observed in both treatment groups (HRT-only, 4.6%; combined risedronate-HRT, 5.2%); the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Both therapies led to significant increases in BMD at 12 months at the femoral neck (1.8% and 2.7%, respectively), femoral trochanter (3.2% and 3.7%), distal radius (1.7% and 1.6%), and midshaft radius (0.4% and 0.7%). The differences between groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) at the femoral neck and midshaft radius. Both combined risedronate-HRT and HRT-only produced significant decreases in the biochemical markers of bone turnover, with somewhat greater decreases in the combined treatment group. Bone biopsy data showed normal bone structure and normal mineralization with either treatment. Expected decreases in bone turnover were observed and were greater in the combined treatment group (68-79% reduction relative to baseline values, P < 0.005). Overall, combined treatment had a safety profile similar to that of HRT-only, including bone and gastrointestinal safety profiles. In conclusion, the combined treatment with risedronate and HRT had a favorable effect on BMD similar to that of HRT alone at the lumbar spine and slightly, but significantly, greater than that of HRT alone at the femoral neck and midshaft radius. The combined treatment was well tolerated, and there were no adverse effects on the skeleton.

Context: Risedronate, a potent bisphosphonate, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of Paget disease of bone and other metabolic bone diseases but, to our knowledge, it has not been evaluated in the treatment of established postmenopausal osteoporosis., Objective: To test the efficacy and safety of daily treatment with risedronate to reduce the risk of vertebral and other fractures in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis., Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 2458 ambulatory postmenopausal women younger than 85 years with at least 1 vertebral fracture at baseline who were enrolled at 1 of 110 centers in North America conducted between December 1993 and January 1998., Interventions: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive oral treatment for 3 years with risedronate (2.5 or 5 mg/d) or placebo. All subjects received calcium, 1000 mg/d. Vitamin D (cholecalciferol, up to 500 IU/d) was provided if baseline levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D were low., Main Outcome Measures: Incidence of new vertebral fractures as detected by quantitative and semiquantitative assessments of radiographs; incidence of radiographically confirmed nonvertebral fractures and change from baseline in bone mineral density as determined by dual x-ray absorptiometry., Results: The 2.5 mg/d of risedronate arm was discontinued after 1 year; in the placebo and 5 mg/d of risedronate arms, 450 and 489 subjects, respectively, completed all 3 years of the trial. Treatment with 5 mg/d of risedronate, compared with placebo, decreased the cumulative incidence of new vertebral fractures by 41 % (95% confidence interval [CI], 18%-58%) over 3 years (11.3 % vs 16.3%; P= .003). A fracture reduction of 65% (95% CI, 38%-81 %) was observed after the first year (2.4% vs 6.4%; P<.001). The cumulative incidence of nonvertebral fractures over 3 years was reduced by 39% (95% CI, 6%-61 %) (5.2 % vs 8.4%; P = .02). Bone mineral density increased significantly compared with placebo at the lumbar spine (5.4% vs 1.1 %), femoral neck (1.6% vs -1.2%), femoral trochanter (3.3% vs -0.7%), and midshaft of the radius (0.2% vs -1.4%). Bone formed during risedronate treatment was histologically normal. The overall safety profile of risedronate, including gastrointestinal safety, was similar to that of placebo., Conclusions: These data suggest that risedronate therapy is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Hyperthyroidism is characterized by increased bone turnover and resorptive activity. Similar changes in remodeling are seen in osteoporosis. To study the pathogenetic role of thyroid hormone in osteoporosis, we measured concentrations of free and total thyroid hormones and investigated the sensitivity of the skeleton toward thyroid hormones in 14 osteoporotic, 16 estrogen-treated, and 15 normal postmenopausal women with comparable thyroid status. Triiodothyronine (T3, 60 microg/day for 7 days) was administered to the three groups. The skeletal response was assessed by monitoring bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), osteocalcin (BGP), and pyridinium cross-linked telopeptide domain of type I collagen (ICTP) in serum and urinary excretion of hydroxyproline (OHP), pyridinoline (PYR), and deoxypyridinoline (DPR) at days 0, 8, 15, and 57. Women on estrogen replacement therapy exhibited lower bone turnover than the normal postmenopausal women. Markers of bone formation were reduced by 19-43% and markers of resorption by 22-48%. The osteoporotic women displayed lower bone mass at the lumbar spine and the distal forearm (p < 0.01-0.001), but the levels of biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption were comparable to values obtained in the normal postmenopausal women. T3 stimulation caused significant increases (p values ranging between 0.05-0.001) in all three groups of the resorptive markers: ICTP (47%, 47%, 45%), OHP (29%, 30%, 33%), PYR (43%, 27%, 51%), and DPR (42%, 24%, 59%). Of the formative markers, only BGP increased significantly (32%, 40%, 47%) (p < 0.001). At day 57, however, all three formative markers increased compared with day 15 (p < 0.05-0.001). No significant differences in bone markers were demonstrated between groups. In the osteoporotic group, as the only group, serum calcium increased (p < 0.05) and serum PTH fell (p < 0.05). In conclusion, osteoporosis and estrogen substitution are not characterized by altered concentrations of thyroid hormones or responsiveness to thyroid hormones at the level of individual bone cells; however, altered responses pertaining to PTH and calcium were detected.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has been the method of choice for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis since the early 1990s. Although a number of routes of administration are now available, HRT is still predominantly administered orally. In the United States, HRT formulations traditionally comprise conjugated equine estrogens. In Europe, however, HRT preparations tend to be based on 17 beta-estradiol, a natural human estrogen. Furthermore, distinct patterns of HRT use are apparent based on the age of the woman receiving it. Current recommendations are that early postmenopausal women (in their early 50s) receive sequential combined estrogen/progestogen therapy with continued monthly bleeds, while in women who are at least 1 year postmenopausal, continuous combined HRT, which leads to endometrial atrophy and cessation of monthly bleeding, is preferred. Clinical experience to date clearly demonstrates that long-term HRT unequivocally increases bone mass and reduces the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women, with no significant differences between sequential and continuous combined prescribing regimens. Data demonstrating that antiestrogens such as tamoxifen may preserve bone mass have led to the initiation of large-scale trials to determine the potential clinical utility of such agents for the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Nonhormonal therapeutic approaches are now also available, most notably bisphosphonates and vitamin D analogs. At present, however, traditional HRT remains the regimen of choice for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, given its additional beneficial effects on acute menopausal symptoms, as well as on the cardiovascular system and brain.

A so-called osteoporosis-profile has become increasingly popular among Danish doctors. Future bone loss in peri- and postmenopausal women is estimated by means of an algorithm comprising serum osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatases as markers of bone formation and urinary calcium and hydroxyproline excretions, corrected for creatinine, as markers of bone resorption. The osteoporosis-profile, performed by Medi-Lab, was tested in six females aged 46-56 years. Three different diets were used on three successive week-ends, each ending with a collagen-free supper and an overnight fast. Individual changes in estimated bone loss of up to 200-300% were found, demonstrating that the test was useless in a single person.

The cause of bone loss in patients with osteoporosis is not known, but both increased bone resorption and decreased bone formation have been reported. Theoretically, these effects may result from either increased activity of osteoclasts or decreased activity of osteoblasts, or both. In vivo, growth hormone (GH) administration leads to activation of osteoclasts and osteoblasts as evidenced by increased biochemical markers of bone resorption and bone formation. To test for disturbances in responsiveness of bone cells to exogenous hormonal stimuli in osteoporosis, we compared 15 patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis with 15 healthy age-matched postmenopausal women before and during a 3 day stimulation test with GH (0.2 IU/kg/day). Serum insulin-like growth factor I increased in both groups (p < 0.001). GH treatment increased biochemical markers of bone resorption (serum carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [ICTP] [p < 0.001] and, to a lesser extent, 24 h urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine) in the two groups. Similarly, biochemical markers for bone formation increased in both groups [osteocalcin (p < 0.01) and procollagen type I C-terminal propeptide, PICP (p < 0.001)]. GH treatment reduced alkaline phosphatase (ALP, p < 0.05) and its bone-specific isoenzyme (bone ALP, p < 0.01) in both groups. The maximal response, the area under the curve (AUC) of response curves for IGF-I, bone resorption markers, and bone formation markers were not different between groups. Our data do not support the hypothesis that osteoporotic patients display major disturbances in responsiveness to GH.

Decreased osteoblastic activity seems to play an important role in the pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The aim of the present study was to examine the direct effects of human growth hormone (GH) on proliferation and differentiation of osteoblastic cells obtained from patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and age-matched normals and to compare the cellular responses induced by GH between the two groups. Osteoblast cultures (human marrow stromal osteoblast-like cells) were established from bone marrow aspirates obtained from 9 osteoporotic patients and 12 age-matched normals. Effects on cell proliferation and cell differentiation markers [alkaline phosphatase (AP)], procollagen type I propeptide (PICP), and osteocalcin] were assessed. GH stimulated 3H-thymidine incorporation into DNA in cell cultures of osteoporotic patients to a maximum of 158 +/- 14% of no-treatment controls (n = 9, P < 0.001) and to 203 +/- 52% (n = 9, P < 0.001) in normals. GH increased cell number as measured by methylene blue (MB) assay in cells of osteoporotic patients to 138 +/- 10% (P < 0.05, n = 7) and in normals to 138 +/- 12 (P < 0.05, n = 7). GH alone reduced cellular AP production: 61 +/- 3.8% (P < 0.05, n = 7) versus 65 +/- 16% (P < 0.05, n = 7) and cellular PICP production: 79 +/- 6% (P < 0.05, n = 7) versus 69 +/- 16% (n.s., n = 7), in cell cultures of osteoporotics and normals, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Thirty-seven patients were randomized to receive intermittent cyclic etidronate (400 mg/day oral for 2 weeks, followed by 13 weeks off treatment) or an ADFR treatment (100 micrograms/day oral triiodothyronine for 7 days, followed by 400 mg/day etidronate for 2 weeks and 12 weeks off treatment). Supplemental calcium (120 mg/day) and vitamin D3 (400 IU/day) were given throughout the study period to all patients. Biochemical analyses, iliac-crest bone biopsies, and lumbar bone mineral content (BMC) measurements were performed before and during 60 weeks of treatment. Sixteen patients in the intermittent cyclic etidronate group and 15 in the ADFR group completed 60 weeks of treatment. Serum alkaline phosphatase decreased from 185 (43) (mean, (SD] to 144 (35) (p less than 0.001) and from 221 (69) to 156 (43) (p less than 0.002) during intermittent cyclic etidronate treatment and ADFR treatment, respectively, without any significant changes in renal hydroxyproline excretion. Final resorption depth, trabecular bone activation frequency, and bone formation rate decreased significantly from 51.5 (48.4/60.0) microns (median (25%/75% quartiles] to 44.0 (39.6/46.2) microns (p less than 0.04), from 0.30 (0.17/0.62) year-1 to 0.10 (0.02/0.19) year-1 (p less than 0.03) and from 0.035 (0.020/0.081) microns3/microns2/day to 0.015 (0.002/0.025) microns3/microns2/day, p less than 0.03 respectively, during intermittent cyclic etidronate treatment, but were unchanged during ADFR treatment. No significant changes in trabecular bone volume, bone balance per remodeling cycle, or BMC were noted in either treatment group; no evidence of osteomalacia was found. Intermittent cyclic etidronate treatment may be effective in preventing bone loss and in decreasing the risk of trabecular plate perforation, and thereby maintaining the integrity of bone architecture, in postmenopausal osteoporosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

To define the role of parathyroid gland function in the pathophysiology of bone loss in type I (postmenopausal) osteoporosis, we measured serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration by immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) and by multisite immunochemiluminometric assay (ICMA) in 63 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (PMOp) with vertebral compression fractures and in 75 age-comparable postmenopausal normal women (PMNl). Also, tetracycline-based histomorphometric indices in cancellous bone were assessed in iliac biopsy samples from 61 PMOp and 28 PMNl women. Serum PTH concentrations by IRMA were similar in PMOp and PMNl (medians, 3.92 and 3.77 pmol/l; NS) but were significantly lower in PMOp by the more sensitive ICMA (medians, 2.82 and 3.14 pmol/l; P less than 0.01). By multiple linear regression analysis, serum PTH was directly related (P less than 0.001) to activation frequency, bone resorption rate, bone formation rate, and the calculated rate of bone loss. For each unit (pmol/l) increase in serum PTH by ICMA, activation frequency increased by 1.3%/year more (P = 0.01), bone resorption rate increased by 3.9%/year more (P = 0.003), and the rate of cancellous bone loss was 2.8% greater (P = 0.0003) in the PMOp women compared with the PMNl women. Concentrations of serum estradiol, but not serum estrone, had a weak opposing effect to PTH, especially for bone formation rate. These data suggest that in PMOp the bone has increased sensitivity to the biologic effects of PTH. This may represent one of the fundamental pathophysiologic defects in PMOp and, in the setting of estrogen deficiency, may explain, in part, their greater rate of bone loss.

The cellular mechanisms for bone loss in type I (postmenopausal) osteoporosis are highly controversial. We attempted to resolve this by assessing rates of formation and resorption of iliac cancellous bone by a new histomorphometric method in 89 women with osteoporosis (mean age +/- SD, 66 +/- 6 years) and in 32 carefully selected normal postmenopausal women (64 +/- 6 years). In the osteoporotic women, bone resorption rate was increased by 39% (P less than 0.05) at the cellular level and by 67% (P less than 0.05) at the tissue level, whereas bone formation was unchanged at the tissue level but decreased by 14% (P less than 0.01) at the cellular (osteoblast) level. This pronounced remodeling imbalance (P less than 0.001) was probably exacerbated by a 45% increase (P less than 0.1) in activation frequency of new remodeling foci. These abnormalities were associated with a high rate of cancellous bone loss (median, 5.8%/year versus 0.1% year in controls). Thus, accelerated loss of cancellous bone in type I osteoporosis results from the combination of increased bone resorption and inadequate compensation by bone formation.

Thirty-seven patients with postmenopausal crush fracture osteoporosis were randomized to oral cyclic estrogen/gestagen (n = 20) or oral calcium (2000 mg elemental calcium per day) (n = 17). Fourteen in each group completed 1 year of treatment. Iliac crest bone biopsies were obtained after intravital double labeling with tetracycline before and after treatment in 10 patients on estrogen/gestagen and 11 patients on calcium. In the estrogen/gestagen group the activation frequency in trabecular bone decreased from 0.52 + 0.11 (SEM) year-1 to 0.27 + 0.08 year-1 (p less than 0.01). No significant changes were found in resorption or formation periods. The osteoid surfaces and the mineralizing surfaces decreased (p less than 0.05), whereas the decrease in eroded surfaces was insignificant. Furthermore, no significant changes were observed in final resorption depth, wall thickness or bone balance per remodeling cycle. Serum alkaline phosphatase and renal hydroxyproline excretion decreased during treatment (p less than 0.002), whereas the lumbar bone mineral content (BMC) increased (p less than 0.01). In the calcium group the extent and thickness of osteoid surfaces decreased (p less than 0.05) without significant changes in activation frequency. Serum alkaline phosphatase and renal hydroxyproline excretion decreased during treatment (p less than 0.02). No significant changes were observed in lumbar BMC or the other histomorphometric parameters. The study supports that the positive effect of estrogen/gestagen on BMC can be explained by a reduction in the activation frequency of new remodeling cycles leading to a decreased remodeling space and an increase in mean bone age. There is no evidence of a positive balance per remodeling cycle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)