Search

Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, pharmacodynamics (PD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of SB16 versus reference denosumab (DEN) up to 18 months in postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) patients, and assessed outcomes after switching from DEN to SB16 compared to those who continued with DEN or SB16., Methods: 457 PMO patients were initially randomized, with 407 re-randomized at Month 12 to either continue DEN (DEN+DEN), switch to SB16 (DEN+SB16), or continue SB16 (SB16 + SB16) through Month 18. Efficacy was assessed by the percent change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck. Safety, PD, PK, and immunogenicity were evaluated throughout the study period., Results: Mean percent changes from baseline in lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck BMD at Month 18 were comparable across treatment groups, indicating comparable efficacy between SB16 and DEN. The mean percent change in lumbar spine BMD was 6.8 % (SB16 + SB16), 6.2 % (DEN+SB16), and 6.8 % (DEN+DEN). Total hip BMD increased by 4.4 %, 3.5 %, and 4.0 %, and femoral neck BMD by 3.4 %, 3.1 %, and 2.7 % for SB16 + SB16, DEN+SB16, and DEN+DEN, respectively. Safety profiles were similar among groups, with no new safety concerns identified after switching. Only one patient in the DEN+SB16 group developed non-neutralizing anti-drug antibodies by Month 18, indicating a low immunogenicity risk for SB16., Conclusion: Switching from DEN to SB16 demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety, PD, PK, and immunogenicity in PMO patients relative to those who continued DEN. SB16 was well tolerated over 18 months, demonstrating comparable outcomes to DEN., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Yoon-sok Chung reports a relationship with Amgen that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Yoon-sok Chung reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Bente Langdahl reports a relationship with Amgen that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Bente Langdahl reports a relationship with UCB that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Bente Langdahl reports a relationship with Gedeon-Richter that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Bente Langdahl reports a relationship with Astellas that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Bente Langdahl reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Bente Langdahl reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: funding grants. Rafal Plebanski reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: funding grants. Edward Czerwinski reports a relationship with Amgen that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Edward Czerwinski reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: funding grants. Eva Dokoupilova reports a relationship with AbbVie that includes: funding grants. Eva Dokoupilova reports a relationship with Eli Lilly that includes: funding grants. Eva Dokoupilova reports a relationship with GSK that includes: funding grants. Eva Dokoupilova reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: funding grants. Eva Dokoupilova reports a relationship with Biopharma SPRL that includes: funding grants. Eva Dokoupilova reports a relationship with Pfizer that includes: funding grants. Eva Dokoupilova reports a relationship with Sanofi that includes: funding grants. Eva Dokoupilova reports a relationship with Hexal AG that includes: funding grants. Eva Dokoupilova reports a relationship with Gilead that includes: funding grants. Eva Dokoupilova reports a relationship with Janssen that includes: funding grants. Eva Dokoupilova reports a relationship with Galapagos that includes: funding grants. Eva Dokoupilova reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: funding grants. Jerzy Supronik reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: funding grants. Jan Rosa reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: funding grants. Andrzej Mydlak reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: funding grants. Rafal Sapula reports a relationship with Zamosc Rehabilitation Clinic that includes: employment. Rafal Sapula reports a relationship with Polish Rehabilitation Society that includes: board membership. Rafal Sapula reports a relationship with Medical Rehabilitation for Lublin Region that includes: consulting or advisory. Rafal Sapula reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: funding grants. Anna Rowinska-Osuch reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: funding grants. Ki-Hyun Baek reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: funding grants. Audrone Urboniene reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: funding grants. Robert Mordaka reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: funding grants. Sohui Ahn reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: employment. Sohui Ahn reports a relationship with Samsung Biologics that includes: equity or stocks. Young Hee Rho reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: employment. Young Hee Rho reports a relationship with Samsung Biologics that includes: equity or stocks. Jisuk Ban reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: employment. Jisuk Ban reports a relationship with Samsung Biologics that includes: equity or stocks. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: consulting or advisory. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Immunodiagnostic Systems that includes: consulting or advisory. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Sandoz that includes: consulting or advisory. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: consulting or advisory. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with CL Bio that includes: consulting or advisory. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with CureTeQ that includes: consulting or advisory. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Biocon that includes: consulting or advisory. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Grunenthal that includes: consulting or advisory. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Takeda that includes: consulting or advisory. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Theramex that includes: consulting or advisory. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with UCB that includes: consulting or advisory. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Pharmacosmos that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Alexion that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Radius that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with UCB that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Amgen that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Samsung Bioepis that includes: travel reimbursement. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with CL Bio that includes: travel reimbursement. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Alexion that includes: funding grants. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with CL Bio that includes: funding grants. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with Osteolabs that includes: funding grants. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with DSMB for Biocon that includes: Chairman. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with DSMB for CureTeQ that includes: Chairman. Richard Eastell reports a relationship with DSMB for STOPFOP that includes: Chairman. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Post hoc analysis of FRAME and ARCH revealed that on-study nonvertebral and vertebral fractures by Month 12 were less common in women initially treated with romosozumab versus placebo or alendronate. Recurrent fracture risk was also lower in romosozumab‑treated patients, and there were no fracture‑related complications. Results support continuing romosozumab treatment post‑fracture., Purpose: Post hoc analysis evaluating efficacy and safety of romosozumab, administered in the immediate post‑fracture period, in the FRAME and ARCH phase 3 trials., Methods: In FRAME (NCT01575834) and ARCH (NCT01631214), postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to romosozumab 210 mg monthly or comparator (FRAME, placebo; ARCH, alendronate 70 mg weekly) for 12 months, followed by antiresorptive therapy (FRAME, denosumab; ARCH, alendronate). In patients who experienced on-study nonvertebral or new/worsening vertebral fracture by Month 12, we report the following: fracture and treatment‑emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidence through 36 months, bone mineral density changes (BMD), and romosozumab timing. Due to the sample sizes employed, meaningful statistical comparisons between treatments were not possible., Results: Incidence of on-study nonvertebral and vertebral fractures by Month 12 was numerically lower in romosozumab- versus comparator-treated patients (FRAME, 1.6% and 0.5% versus 2.1% and 1.6%; ARCH, 3.4% and 3.3% versus 4.6% and 4.9%, respectively). In those who experienced on-study nonvertebral fracture by Month 12, recurrent nonvertebral and subsequent vertebral fracture incidences were numerically lower in patients initially treated with romosozumab versus comparator (FRAME, 3.6% [2/56] and 1.8% [1/56] versus 9.2% [7/76] and 3.9% [3/76]; ARCH, 10.0% [7/70] and 5.7% [4/70] versus 12.6% [12/95] and 8.4% [8/95], respectively). Among those with on-study vertebral fracture by Month 12, recurrent vertebral and subsequent nonvertebral fracture incidences were numerically lower with romosozumab versus comparator (FRAME, 0.0% [0/17] and 0.0% [0/17] versus 11.9% [7/59] and 8.5% [5/59]; ARCH, 9.0% [6/67] and 7.5% [5/67] versus 15.0% [15/100] and 16.0% [16/100], respectively). In patients with fracture by Month 12, no fracture‑related complications were reported in romosozumab-treated patients. BMD gains were numerically greater with romosozumab than comparators., Conclusion: Data suggest support for the efficacy and safety of continuing romosozumab treatment following fracture., Trial Registrations: NCT01575834; NCT01631214., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To review the comparative effectiveness of osteoporosis treatments, including the bone anabolic agents, abaloparatide and romosozumab, on reducing the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women, and to characterise the effect of antiosteoporosis drug treatments on the risk of fractures according to baseline risk factors., Design: Systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trials., Data Sources: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify randomised controlled trials published between 1 January 1996 and 24 November 2021 that examined the effect of bisphosphonates, denosumab, selective oestrogen receptor modulators, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, and romosozumab compared with placebo or active comparator., Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Randomised controlled trials that included non-Asian postmenopausal women with no restriction on age, when interventions looked at bone quality in a broad perspective. The primary outcome was clinical fractures. Secondary outcomes were vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, and major osteoporotic fractures, all cause mortality, adverse events, and serious cardiovascular adverse events., Results: The results were based on 69 trials (>80 000 patients). For clinical fractures, synthesis of the results showed a protective effect of bisphosphonates, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, and romosozumab compared with placebo. Compared with parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, bisphosphonates were less effective in reducing clinical fractures (odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 2.00). Compared with parathyroid hormone receptor agonists and romosozumab, denosumab was less effective in reducing clinical fractures (odds ratio 1.85, 1.18 to 2.92 for denosumab v parathyroid hormone receptor agonists and 1.56, 1.02 to 2.39 for denosumab v romosozumab). An effect of all treatments on vertebral fractures compared with placebo was found. In the active treatment comparisons, denosumab, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, and romosozumab were more effective than oral bisphosphonates in preventing vertebral fractures. The effect of all treatments was unaffected by baseline risk indicators, except for antiresorptive treatments that showed a greater reduction of clinical fractures compared with placebo with increasing mean age (number of studies=17; β=0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 0.99). No harm outcomes were seen. The certainty in the effect estimates was moderate to low for all individual outcomes, mainly because of limitations in reporting, nominally indicating a serious risk of bias and imprecision., Conclusions: The evidence indicated a benefit of a range of treatments for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women for clinical and vertebral fractures. Bone anabolic treatments were more effective than bisphosphonates in the prevention of clinical and vertebral fractures, irrespective of baseline risk indicators. Hence this analysis provided no clinical evidence for restricting the use of anabolic treatment to patients with a very high risk of fractures., Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42019128391., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare support from UCB and Amgen for the submitted work: MNH, IC, CvB, JFR, AU, SMN, and RC report grants from UCB and Amgen paid to the Parker Institute to conduct the study; J-JB reports personal fees from UCB during the conduct of the study and personal fees from UCB and Sandoz outside the submitted work; MLB reports fees as honorarium, speaker, grants, and consultant from Amgen, Bruno Farmaceutici, Calcilytix, Kyowa Kirin, UCB, Abiogen, Alexion, Echolight, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Kirin, SPA, Theramex, and Amolyt outside the submitted work; AD-P has received speaker fees from Amgen, Lilly, and Theramex and is a shareholder of Active Life; PH reports personal fees from UCB during the conduct of the study and personal fees from UCB, Amgen, Gedeon Richter, Stada, and Theramex outside the submitted work; MKJ reports personal fees and non-financial support from UCB during the conduct of the study, and grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Amgen and UCB outside the submitted work; MKJ was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and the views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health; WFL reports speakers fee/advisory board from UCB, Amgen, Pfizer, and Lilly; XN has received fees for consulting from UCB and Amgen and for lectures from UCB, Amgen, and Lilly; CR reports personal fees from UCB during the conduct of the study, and grants and personal fees from Alexion, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Amgen outside the submitted work; SM reports fees as speaker and advisory board from Abiogen, Amgen, Bruno Farmaceutici, Diasorin, Eli Lilly, Shire, Sandoz, Takeda, Abiogen, Kyowa Kirin, Pfizer and UCB outside the submitted work; TT reports personal fees from UCB during the conduct of the study, personal fees from Amgen, Arrow, and Biogen, personal fees from Grunenthal, Jansen, LCA, Lilly, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Thuasne, and Theramex, grants and personal fees from Chugai and UCB, and grants from Bone Therapeutics outside the submitted work; SLF reports grants from Amgen, consulting and lecture honorarium from UCB, consulting honorarium from Radius, and grants and consulting honorarium from Agnovos outside the submitted work; DP-A's department received consultancy fees related to this work, DP-A reports grants and fees for speaker services and advisory board membership from Amgen, grants, non-financial support, and fees for consultancy services from UCB Biopharma, grants from Les Laboratoires Servier and UCB outside the submitted work, DP-A is an HTA Funding Committee membership, and Janssen, on behalf of Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) funded European Health Data and Evidence Network (EHDEN) and European Medical Information Framework (EMIF) consortiums, and Synapse Management Partners, have supported training programmes organised by DP-A's department that are open to external participants; BL reports personal fees from UCB during the conduct of the study and BL has received funding to her institution from Amgen and Novo Nordisk and personal fees from Amgen, UCB, Eli Lilly, Gedeon-Richter, and Gilead outside the submitted work; BA reports personal fees from UCB during the conduct of the study, grants and personal fees from UCB and Kyowa-Kirin UK, personal fees from Amgen, grants from Novartis, and grants and personal fees from Pharmacosmos outside the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Postmenopausal women are at significant risk for osteoporotic fractures due to their rapid bone loss. Half of all postmenopausal women will get an osteoporosis-related fracture over their lifetime, with 25% developing a spine deformity and 15% developing a hip fracture. By 2050, more than half of all osteoporotic fractures will occur in Asia, with postmenopausal women being the most susceptible. Early management can halt or even reverse the progression of osteoporosis. Consequently, on October 31, 2020, the Taiwanese Osteoporosis Association hosted the Asia-Pacific (AP) Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Fracture Prevention (POFP) consensus meeting, which was supported by the Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies (AFOS) and the Asia Pacific Osteoporosis Foundation (APOF). International and domestic experts developed ten applicable statements for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women with low bone mass or osteoporosis but no fragility fractures in the AP region. The experts advocated, for example, that postmenopausal women with a high fracture risk be reimbursed for pharmaceutical therapy to prevent osteoporotic fractures. More clinical experience and data are required to modify intervention tactics., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Chih-Hsing Wu received honoraria for lectures, attending meetings, and/or travel from Eli Lilly, Roche, Amgen, Merck, Servier laboratories, GE Lunar, Harvester, TCM Biotech, and Alvogen/Lotus. E Michael Lewiecki is an investigator, consultant, and speaker for Amgen, and an investigator for Radius., (Copyright © 2023 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In this post hoc analysis, we assessed romosozumab efficacy and safety in European patients enrolled in FRAME. Romosozumab treatment through 12 months, followed by denosumab for a further 24 months, resulted in early and sustained risk reduction for major fracture categories, associated with large gains in bone mineral density., Introduction: In the multinational FRAME phase 3 trial of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, marked differences between clinical and non-vertebral fracture outcomes were observed among patients from Central and Southern America versus rest of world. This post hoc analysis assessed romosozumab efficacy and safety in European patients enrolled in the FRAME trial and extension study., Methods: In FRAME (NCT01575834), patients were randomised 1:1 to romosozumab 210 mg or placebo monthly (QM) for 12 months, followed by open-label denosumab 60 mg Q6M to month 36, including a 12-month extension study. We report incidence of major fracture outcomes, bone mineral density (BMD) change from baseline and safety for European patients enrolled in FRAME., Results: In FRAME, 3013/7180 (41.96%) patients were European; 1494 received romosozumab and 1519 received placebo. Through 12 months, romosozumab reduced fracture risk versus placebo for non-vertebral fracture (1.4% versus 3.0%; p = 0.004), clinical fracture (1.4% versus 3.6%; p < 0.001), new vertebral fracture (0.4% versus 2.1%; p < 0.001) and major osteoporotic fracture (0.9% versus 2.8%; p < 0.001), with results sustained through 36 months following transition to denosumab. Hip fractures were numerically reduced with romosozumab at month 12 (0.2% versus 0.6%; p = 0.092). Romosozumab increased BMD versus placebo at month 12; all patients in the romosozumab and placebo groups experienced further increases by month 36 after transition to denosumab. Adverse events were balanced between groups., Conclusions: Among European patients in FRAME, romosozumab resulted in early and sustained risk reduction for all major fracture categories, associated with large BMD gains that continued after transition to denosumab., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Vertebral fractures (VFs) are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture, and their prevalence and severity are key risk factors for future fragility fractures. Here, we assess the treatment effect of romosozumab on the incidence of new on-study VFs according to Genant severity grades (mild, moderate, and severe). Data are reported from two phase 3 clinical studies for patients who received romosozumab versus placebo through 12 months, followed by denosumab through 24 months (FRAME: NCT01575834), and for patients who received romosozumab through 12 months, followed by alendronate through 24 months, versus alendronate only through 24 months (ARCH: NCT01631214). The treatment effect of romosozumab is reported for all included patients, and for patients with prevalent and severe baseline VFs. The incidence of new moderate-or-severe VFs was reduced through 12 months for patients treated with romosozumab versus placebo (FRAME; 0.25% versus 1.42%, respectively; p < 0.001) or alendronate (ARCH; 2.78% versus 4.00%, respectively; p = 0.042). Furthermore, the treatment effect of romosozumab on the incidence of new VFs across moderate and severe severity grades was independent of baseline VF prevalence or severity; through 12 months, consistent reductions in new moderate-or-severe VFs were observed regardless of prevalent (FRAME; p = 0.18) or severe (ARCH; p = 0.52) VFs at baseline. Reductions in the incidence of new moderate and severe VFs were sustained through 24 months, after transition from romosozumab to denosumab or alendronate, independent of baseline VF prevalence or severity; no significant interactions were observed between the incidence of new moderate-or-severe VFs and the presence of prevalent (FRAME; p = 0.81) or severe (ARCH; p = 0.99) VFs at baseline. With increasing recommendations for initial treatment with bone-forming agents for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, these analyses will help to inform treatment decisions for patients at very high risk of VF., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis found that there were early increases in bone turnover markers and decreases in bone mineral density after discontinuation of long-term alendronate. These findings might help guide treatment decisions, including monitoring after alendronate withdrawal., Introduction: The short-term effects of discontinuing long-term bisphosphonates are poorly characterized. This post hoc analysis investigated 1-12-month changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTM) after alendronate (ALN) discontinuation., Methods: Data were from a randomized, double-blind trial of MK-5442 (calcium-sensing receptor antagonist) following oral bisphosphonates, with placebo and continued ALN controls ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00996801). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis had received oral bisphosphonate (≥ 3-4 preceding years; ALN for the 12 months pre-screening), continuing on ALN 70 mg/week (n = 87) or placebo (n = 88)., Results: At 12 months, least-squares mean percent changes from baseline BMD (placebo vs. ALN) were lumbar spine (LS): - 0.36 vs. 1.29, total hip: - 1.44 vs. 0.46, and femoral neck (FN): - 1.26 vs. - 0.08 (all P < 0.05). BTM levels increased by 1-3 months, to 12 months, with placebo vs. ALN (P < 0.001). FN BMD decline was greater in the placebo subgroup with higher urinary N-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen/creatinine [uNTx/Cr] (P < 0.01), and higher serum N-terminal pro-peptide of type 1 collagen [P1NP] levels (P < 0.05), at baseline. There was a trend toward greater FN BMD loss with higher BTM levels at 3 and/or 6 months. Younger age and higher LS BMD at baseline were associated with greater LS BMD loss at 12 months (P = 0.04 and < 0.01, respectively); higher baseline FN BMD predicted greater FN BMD loss (P = 0.04)., Conclusion: Early changes in BTM levels and BMD were observed after discontinuation of long-term ALN. Further characterization of factors associated with patients' risk of bone loss upon bisphosphonate discontinuation is warranted., (© 2021. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.)

In patients discontinuing ALN after a median of 7.0 years (range 5.0-20.0 years), BMD decreased, and bone turnover markers increased within the premenopausal reference range over 2 years. Increased p-CTX after 3 months was associated with greater bone loss at the hip confirming that maintenance of BMD is dependent on continued suppression of bone turnover., Introduction: It is unknown how to monitor patients discontinuing alendronate (ALN) after more than 5 years. We investigated if BTM measured before or during treatment discontinuation with ALN predict bone loss after 1 or 2 years., Methods: PROSA was a cohort study conducted at Aarhus University Hospital including postmenopausal women and men above 50 years treated with ALN ≥ 5 years who had osteopenia at the hip and BMD T-score at the lumbar spine > - 4. ALN was discontinued and BTMs were measured at baseline, months (M) 1, 3, 6, and 12, and DXA was performed at baseline, M6, and M12. We extended the study and measured BTMs and performed DXA at M24. The primary endpoint was if changes in p-CTX at M3 or M6 predict changes in THBMD after 1 year ( Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT03051620)., Results: We enrolled 136 participants discontinuing ALN after a median of 7.0 years (range 5.0-20.0 years) in PROSA and 124 participants in PROSA Extension. There was a significant decrease in LSBMD - 0.74% ± 0.27, THBMD - 2.65% ± 0.39, FNBMD - 2.35% ± 0.33, and trabecular bone score - 0.97% ± 0.35 and an increase in p-CTX by 61.1% ± 4.7 (p < 0.05 for all) after 24 months. Increase in p-CTX at M3 was associated with bone loss at the hip sites at M12 and M24., Conclusion: In patients discontinuing ALN, BMD decreased significantly and BTMs increased within the reference range over 2 years. An increase in p-CTX after 3 months was associated with greater bone loss at the hip confirming that maintenance of BMD during treatment discontinuation is dependent on continued suppression of bone turnover., (© 2021. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.)

Increased bone turnover and rapid bone loss follow discontinuation of denosumab. We investigated the long-term efficacy of zoledronate (ZOL) in maintaining bone mineral density (BMD) after discontinuation of denosumab. In this randomized, open-label, interventional study, we included 61 postmenopausal women and men older than 50 years discontinuing denosumab after 4.6 ± 1.6 years. We administered ZOL 6 months (6 M) or 9 months (9 M) after the last denosumab or when bone turnover had increased (observation group [OBS]). ZOL was readministrated if p-cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide (p-CTX) increased ≥1.26 μg/L or BMD decreased ≥5%. The results after 12 months have previously been published; here we report the outcome after 24 months (ClinicalTrials NCT03087851). Fifty-eight patients completed the study. From 12 to 24 months after the initial ZOL, lumbar spine (LS) BMD was maintained: 0.9 ± 0.9%, 0.4 ± 0.8%, and 0.3 ± 0.7% in the 6 M, 9 M, and OBS groups, respectively (p > .05, no between-group differences). Similarly, total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN) BMD did not change in any group during year 2. From baseline to 24 months after ZOL, LS BMD decreased by 4.0 ± 0.8%, 4.1 ± 0.8%, and 4.3 ± 1.5% in the 6 M, 9 M, and OBS groups, respectively (p < .001, no between-group differences). Significant bone loss (LS, TH, or FN) was found in all groups 24 months after ZOL: 6 M group: n = 12 (60%), 9 M group: n = 7 (37%), and OBS group: n = 10 (53%). P-CTX did not change significantly during the second year (p > .05, no between-group differences). No patient fulfilled the CTX or fracture criteria for retreatment during year 2; however, 9 patients were retreated at M24 due to BMD loss ≥5%. Two patients sustained a non-vertebral fracture during year 2. Treatment with ZOL subsequent to long-term denosumab did not fully prevent increased bone turnover and bone loss during the first year; however, CTX remained with the reference range and BMD was maintained during the second year. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)., (© 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).)

In this nationwide register-based cohort study, we found no difference in the risk of fractures in patients discontinuing versus continuing alendronate (ALN) treatment after 5 years., Introduction: Information on fracture risk in patients discontinuing ALN in a real-life setting is sparse. We aimed to examine ALN discontinuation patterns, compare fracture rates in patients discontinuing versus continuing ALN after 5 years of treatment, and define determinants of fractures in ALN discontinuers., Methods: A nationwide population-based cohort study using Danish health registry data. Our source population was individuals who had redeemed ≥ 2 ALN prescriptions between January 1, 1995, and September 1, 2017., Results: We found that 25% of all ALN initiators used ALN for less than 1 year and 43% continued treatment for at least 5 years. We classified n = 1865 as ALN discontinuers and n = 29,619 as ALN continuers. Using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and an "as-treated" approach, we observed no increased risk of any fracture (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.06, 95% CI 0.92-1.23), vertebral fracture (IRR 0.59, 95% CI 0.33-1.05), hip fracture (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.75-1.45), or major osteoporotic fracture (IRR 1.05, 95% CI 0.88-1.25) in the ALN discontinuers compared to continuers during a follow-up time of 1.84 ± 1.56 years (mean ± SD) and 2.51 ± 1.60 years, respectively. ALN re-initiation was a major determinant of follow-up among the discontinuers. Old age (> 80 vs. 50-60 years, unadjusted IRR 2.92, 95% CI 1.18-7.24) was the strongest determinant for fractures following ALN discontinuation., Conclusion: In a real-world setting, less than 50% continued ALN treatment for 5 years. We found no difference in the risk of fractures in patients discontinuing versus continuing ALN after 5 years.

We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded clinical trial of MK-7 or placebo daily for 3 years in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. BMD decreased at all sites without differences between the MK-7 and placebo-treated women. Changes in bone turnover markers and microstructure were similar between the two groups., Introduction: Vitamin K is a cofactor in the carboxylation of osteocalcin (OC) and carboxylated OC promotes mineralization of bone. Clinical studies suggest that vitamin K2 prevents bone loss. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of vitamin K2 as an add-on to calcium and vitamin D supplementation on osteocalcin, bone mass, and microarchitecture in postmenopausal women., Methods: We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded clinical trial, including 142 postmenopausal women with osteopenia who received vitamin K2 (375 μg MK-7) or placebo daily for 3 years. Both groups received vitamin D3 (38 μg/day) and calcium (800 mg/day). We measured bone turnover markers in serum and bone mineral density and microarchitecture by DXA and HRpQCT., Results: Undercarboxylated osteocalcin decreased in the MK-7-group (- 65.2 ± 23.5%) (mean ± SD) compared with the placebo group (- 0.03 ± 38.5%), p < 0.01 after 1 year. After 3 years, aBMD decreased at all sites without differences between the MK-7 and placebo-treated women (p > 0.09). aBMD decreased at the total hip by 1.5 ± 2.5% and 2.4 ± 2.7% in the MK-7 and the placebo groups, respectively, at the femoral neck by 1.5 ± 3.5% and 1.0 ± 5.0% in the MK-7 and the placebo groups, respectively, and at the lumbar spine by 1.8 ± 3.9% and 1.1 ± 3.1% in the MK-7 and the placebo groups, respectively. Changes in bone turnover markers were also similar between the two groups.We have previously reported improved microarchitecture with MK-7 after 1 year. However, changes in microstructure over 3 years were similar between the two groups, as assessed by both HRpQCT and DXA trabecular bone score., Conclusion: Treatment with MK-7 375 μg daily as an add-on to calcium and vitamin D increased carboxylation of osteocalcin. However, treatment of postmenopausal women with osteopenia for 3 years did not affect biochemical markers of bone turnover, bone mineral density, or bone microarchitecture., Trial Registration: The study was registered at Clinicaltrial.gov : NCT01922804 .

This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of transitioning to zoledronate following romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. A single dose of 5 mg zoledronate generally maintained the robust BMD gains accrued with romosozumab treatment and was well tolerated., Introduction: Follow-on therapy with an antiresorptive agent is necessary to maintain the skeletal benefits of romosozumab therapy. We evaluated the use of zoledronate following romosozumab treatment., Methods: This phase 2, dose-finding study enrolled postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD). Subjects who received various romosozumab doses or placebo from months 0-24 were rerandomized to denosumab (60 mg SC Q6M) or placebo for 12 months, followed by open-label romosozumab (210 mg QM) for 12 months. At month 48, subjects who had received active treatment for 48 months were assigned to no further active treatment and all other subjects were assigned to zoledronate 5 mg IV. Efficacy (BMD, P1NP, and β-CTX) and safety were evaluated for 24 months, up to month 72., Results: A total of 141 subjects entered the month 48-72 period, with 51 in the no further active treatment group and 90 in the zoledronate group. In subjects receiving no further active treatment, lumbar spine (LS) BMD decreased by 10.8% from months 48-72 but remained 4.2% above the original baseline. In subjects receiving zoledronate, LS BMD was maintained (percentage changes: - 0.8% from months 48-72; 12.8% from months 0-72). Similar patterns were observed for proximal femur BMD in both groups. With no further active treatment, P1NP and β-CTX decreased but remained above baseline at month 72. Following zoledronate, P1NP and β-CTX levels initially decreased but approached baseline by month 72. No new safety signals were observed., Conclusion: A zoledronate follow-on regimen can maintain robust BMD gains achieved with romosozumab treatment.

Efficient therapies are available for the treatment of osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates and denosumab are the most commonly used antiresorptive therapies. Despite differences in the increase in bone mineral density seen with these drugs, the reductions in fracture risk are similar; 50-70%, 20%, and 40% for vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures, respectively. The bone-forming treatments; teriparatide and abaloparatide increase bone mineral density more than the antiresorptives and the reductions in fracture risk are 85% and 40-50% for vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, respectively, compared to placebo. The VERO study demonstrated a >50% reduction in vertebral and clinical fractures in women treated with teriparatide compared to risedronate. The dual-action treatment; romosozumab leads to more pronounced increases in BMD than other treatment modalities and reduces the risk of vertebral and clinical fractures by 73% and 36% compared to placebo after 12 months and the sequential treatment regime; romosozumab for 12 months followed by alendronate reduced the risk of vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures by 48%, 20% and 38%, respectively compared to alendronate after 2-3 years. The evidence for combination therapy targeting both resorption and formation is limited as only short-term studies with BMD as the endpoint have been performed. All bone-forming and dual-action treatments increase BMD and reduce the fracture risk, however, the effect wears off with time and treatment is therefore only temporary and should be followed by antiresorptive treatment with a bisphosphonate or denosumab. The sequence of treatment matters as the BMD response to teriparatide is reduced in patients previously treated with bisphosphonates; however, based on the findings of the VERO trial, the anti-fracture efficacy of bone-forming treatment in comparison with risedronate seems to be preserved after bisphosphonate therapy. The DATA study suggested that transitioning from denosumab to teriparatide is problematic due to the increase in bone resorption occurring after stopping denosumab. Studies have shown further improvements in BMD when transitioning from oral bisphosphonates to zoledronic acid or denosumab. Management of osteoporosis will in many patients include a long-term treatment plan. This will often include sequential therapy which in severe cases preferably should start with bone-forming followed by antiresorptive treatment. The severity of osteoporosis, reaching a treatment goal, and responding to treatment failure are important factors determining the treatment sequence in the individual patient., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Odanacatib (ODN), a selective oral inhibitor of cathepsin K, was an investigational agent previously in development for the treatment of osteoporosis. In this analysis, the effects of ODN on bone remodeling/modeling and structure were examined in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven, Phase 3, Long-term Odanacatib Fracture Trial (LOFT; NCT00529373) and planned double-blind extension in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A total of 386 transilial bone biopsies, obtained from consenting patients at baseline (ODN n = 17, placebo n = 23), month 24 (ODN n = 112, placebo n = 104), month 36 (ODN n = 42, placebo n = 41), and month 60 (ODN n = 27, placebo n = 20) were assessed by dynamic and static bone histomorphometry. Patient characteristics at baseline and BMD changes over 5 years for this subset were comparable to the overall LOFT population. Qualitative assessment of biopsies revealed no abnormalities. Consistent with the mechanism of ODN, osteoclast number was higher with ODN versus placebo over time. Regarding bone remodeling, dynamic bone formation indices in trabecular, intracortical, and endocortical surfaces were generally similar in ODN-treated versus placebo-treated patients after 2 years of treatment. Regarding periosteal modeling, the proportion of patients with periosteal double labels and the bone formation indices increased over time in the ODN-treated patients compared with placebo. This finding supported the observed numerical increase in cortical thickness at month 60 versus placebo. In conclusion, ODN treatment for 5 years did not reduce bone remodeling and increased the proportion of patients with periosteal bone formation. These results are consistent with the mechanism of action of ODN, and are associated with continued BMD increases and reduced risk of fractures compared with placebo in the LOFT Phase 3 fracture trial. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research., (© 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Background: Odanacatib, a cathepsin K inhibitor, reduces bone resorption while maintaining bone formation. Previous work has shown that odanacatib increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of odanacatib to reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis., Methods: The Long-term Odanacatib Fracture Trial (LOFT) was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven study at 388 outpatient clinics in 40 countries. Eligible participants were women aged at least 65 years who were postmenopausal for 5 years or more, with a femoral neck or total hip bone mineral density T-score between -2·5 and -4·0 if no previous radiographic vertebral fracture, or between -1·5 and -4·0 with a previous vertebral fracture. Women with a previous hip fracture, more than one vertebral fracture, or a T-score of less than -4·0 at the total hip or femoral neck were not eligible unless they were unable or unwilling to use approved osteoporosis treatment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either oral odanacatib (50 mg once per week) or matching placebo. Randomisation was done using an interactive voice recognition system after stratification for previous radiographic vertebral fracture, and treatment was masked to study participants, investigators and their staff, and sponsor personnel. If the study completed before 5 years of double-blind treatment, consenting participants could enrol in a double-blind extension study (LOFT Extension), continuing their original treatment assignment for up to 5 years from randomisation. Primary endpoints were incidence of vertebral fractures as assessed using radiographs collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months, yearly, and at final study visit in participants for whom evaluable radiograph images were available at baseline and at least one other timepoint, and hip and non-vertebral fractures adjudicated as being a result of osteoporosis as assessed by clinical history and radiograph. Safety was assessed in participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The adjudicated cardiovascular safety endpoints were a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and new-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter. Individual cardiovascular endpoints and death were also assessed. LOFT and LOFT Extension are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00529373) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT number 2007-002693-66)., Findings: Between Sept 14, 2007, and Nov 17, 2009, we randomly assigned 16 071 evaluable patients to treatment: 8043 to odanacatib and 8028 to placebo. After a median follow-up of 36·5 months (IQR 34·43-40·15) 4297 women assigned to odanacatib and 3960 assigned to placebo enrolled in LOFT Extension (total median follow-up 47·6 months, IQR 35·45-60·06). In LOFT, cumulative incidence of primary outcomes for odanacatib versus placebo were: radiographic vertebral fractures 3·7% (251/6770) versus 7·8% (542/6910), hazard ratio (HR) 0·46, 95% CI 0·40-0·53; hip fractures 0·8% (65/8043) versus 1·6% (125/8028), 0·53, 0·39-0·71; non-vertebral fractures 5·1% (412/8043) versus 6·7% (541/8028), 0·77, 0·68-0·87; all p<0·0001. Combined results from LOFT plus LOFT Extension for cumulative incidence of primary outcomes for odanacatib versus placebo were: radiographic vertebral fractures 4·9% (341/6909) versus 9·6% (675/7011), HR 0·48, 95% CI 0·42-0·55; hip fractures 1·1% (86/8043) versus 2·0% (162/8028), 0·52, 0·40-0·67; non-vertebral fractures 6·4% (512/8043) versus 8·4% (675/8028), 0·74, 0·66-0·83; all p<0·0001. In LOFT, the composite cardiovascular endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 273 (3·4%) of 8043 patients in the odanacatib group versus 245 (3·1%) of 8028 in the placebo group (HR 1·12, 95% CI 0·95-1·34; p=0·18). New-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter occurred in 112 (1·4%) of 8043 patients in the odanacatib group versus 96 (1·2%) of 8028 in the placebo group (HR 1·18, 0·90-1·55; p=0·24). Odanacatib was associated with an increased risk of stroke (1·7% [136/8043] vs 1·3% [104/8028], HR 1·32, 1·02-1·70; p=0·034), but not myocardial infarction (0·7% [60/8043] vs 0·9% [74/8028], HR 0·82, 0·58-1·15; p=0·26). The HR for all-cause mortality was 1·13 (5·0% [401/8043] vs 4·4% [356/8028], 0·98-1·30; p=0·10). When data from LOFT Extension were included, the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in significantly more patients in the odanacatib group than in the placebo group (401 [5·0%] of 8043 vs 343 [4·3%] of 8028, HR 1·17, 1·02-1·36; p=0·029, as did stroke (2·3% [187/8043] vs 1·7% [137/8028], HR 1·37, 1·10-1·71; p=0·0051)., Interpretation: Odanacatib reduced the risk of fracture, but was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, specifically stroke, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Based on the overall balance between benefit and risk, the study's sponsor decided that they would no longer pursue development of odanacatib for treatment of osteoporosis., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Treatment with zoledronic acid 5 mg maintained bone turnover markers in the premenopausal range, increased lumbar spine bone mineral density, and maintained hip bone mineral density in women previously treated with odanacatib 50 mg weekly., Introduction: The development of odanacatib (ODN), a cathepsin K inhibitor, for treatment of osteoporosis was discontinued due to an increased risk of cardiovascular events. As the treatment is considered reversible, participants from the LOFT trial in Aarhus, Denmark, were offered treatment with zoledronic acid (ZOL)., Methods: Sixty-seven postmenopausal women were treated with ZOL 5 mg and followed for 12 months. Of these, 39 had received ODN for 7 years and 28 had received placebo for 5 years and ODN for 2 years. Bone turnover markers (BTM) were measured 3, 6, and 12 months after ZOL, and DXA of spine and hip were performed at time of ZOL treatment and after 12 months., Results: Within the entire study population, BMD at the lumbar spine increased by 2.8 ± 0.9% (mean ± SEM) (p < 0.01) from baseline to month 12. There was no significant change in BMD at the total hip (p = 0.17) or femoral neck (p = 0.39). There was no difference in the changes in BMD from baseline to 12 months between the two groups at any site (p ≥ 0.20 for all). CTX increased by 107 ± 9% (p < 0.001), PINP by 102 ± 16% (p < 0.001), osteocalcin by 32 ± 6% (p = 0.001) and BSAP by 79 ± 37% (p = 0.001) between 3 and 12 months after ZOL. At month 12, BTM were still within the premenopausal reference range. S-25-hydroxyvitamin D increased (p = 0.059), while PTH (p = 0.007) and eGFR (p = 0.014) decreased during the year following ZOL administration., Conclusion: Treatment with ZOL 5 mg maintained BTMs in the premenopausal range and prevented bone loss in women previously treated with ODN.

Objectives: To describe fracture rates, back pain, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and prior bisphosphonate therapy, treated with teriparatide for up to 18 months and followed up for a further 18 months., Design: Prospective, multinational, and observational study., Methods: Data on prior bisphosphonate use, clinical fractures, back pain visual analog scale (VAS), and HRQoL (EQ-5D) were collected over 36 months. Fracture data were summarized in 6-month intervals and analyzed using logistic regression with repeated measures. Changes from baseline in back pain VAS and EQ-VAS were analyzed using a repeated measures model., Results: Of the 1581 enrolled patients with follow-up data, 1161 (73.4%) had a history of prior bisphosphonate use (median duration: 36 months). Of them, 169 (14.6%) sustained ≥1 fracture during 36-month follow-up. Adjusted odds of fracture were significantly decreased at each 6-month interval compared with the first 6 months of teriparatide treatment: 37% decrease in the 12 to <18 months period during teriparatide treatment (P=0.03) and a 76% decrease in the 12- to 18-month period after teriparatide was discontinued (P<0.001). Significant reductions in back pain and improvement in HRQoL were observed., Conclusions: Postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis previously treated with bisphosphonates had a significant reduction in the incidence of fractures compared with the first 6 months of therapy, a reduction in back pain and an improvement in HRQoL during up to 18 months of teriparatide treatment. These outcomes were still evident for at least 18 months after teriparatide was discontinued. The results should be interpreted in the context of an uncontrolled, observational study in a routine clinical setting.

Unlabelled: In this observational study in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis, the incidence of fractures was decreased during 18 months of teriparatide treatment with no evidence of further change in the subsequent 18-month post-teriparatide period when most patients took other osteoporosis medications. Fracture reduction was accompanied by reductions in back pain., Introduction: To describe fracture outcomes and back pain in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis during 18 months of teriparatide treatment and 18 months post-teriparatide in normal clinical practice., Methods: The European Forsteo Observational Study (EFOS) was a prospective, multinational, observational study. Data on incident clinical fractures and back pain (100 mm Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] and questionnaire) were collected. Fracture data were summarised in 6-month intervals and analysed using logistic regression with repeated measures. Changes from baseline in back pain VAS were analysed using a repeated measures model., Results: A total of 208 (13.2%) of 1,576 patients sustained 258 fractures during 36 months of follow-up: 34% were clinical vertebral fractures and 66% non-vertebral fractures. The adjusted odds of fracture were reduced during teriparatide treatment and there was no evidence of further change in the 18-month post-teriparatide period, during which 63.3% patients took bisphosphonates. A 74% decrease in the adjusted odds of fracture in the 30- to <36-month period compared with the first 6-month period was observed (p < 0.001). Back pain decreased during teriparatide treatment and this decrease was sustained after teriparatide discontinuation. Adjusted mean back pain VAS decreased by 26.3 mm after 36 months (p < 0.001) from baseline mean of 57.8 mm., Conclusions: In a real-life clinical setting, the risk of fracture decreased during teriparatide treatment, with no evidence of further change after teriparatide was discontinued. The changes in back pain seen during treatment were maintained for at least 18 months after teriparatide discontinuation. These results should be interpreted in the context of the design of an observational study.

Unlabelled: One thousand seven hundred seventeen perimenopausal women from the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study were genotyped for the -1997G/T, -1663indelT and +1245G/T polymorphisms in the COLIA1 gen. We found that the -1997T allele and a haplotype containing it were associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and increased bone turnover at menopause and after 10 years of follow-up., Introduction: We wanted to investigate whether the -1997G/T, -1663indelT and +1245G/T polymorphisms in the COLIA1 gene are associated with perimenopausal bone mass, early postmenopausal bone loss and interact with hormone treatment., Methods: One thousand seven hundred seventeen perimenopausal women from the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study were genotyped, and haplotypes were determined. BMD was examined by dual X-ray absorptiometry., Results: Women carrying the -1997T variant had lower BMD at all measured sites: lumbar spine BMD 1.030 ± 0.137 g/cm(2), 1.016 ± 0.147 g/cm(2) and 0.988 ± 0.124 g/cm(2) in women with the GG, GT and TT genotypes, respectively (p < 0.05) and total hip BMD 0.921 ± 0.116 g/cm(2), 0.904 ± 0.123 g/cm(2) and 0.887 ± 0.109 g/cm(2) in women with the GG, GT and TT genotypes, respectively (p = 0.01). The effect remained after 10 years although statistical significance was lost. Haplotype 3 (-1997T-1663ins + 1245G) was associated with lower bone mass and higher levels of bone turnover. Compared with haplotype 1, haplotype 3 carriers had lower BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip by 0.016 ± 0.007 g/cm(2), 0.015 ± 0.006 g/cm(2) and 0.017 ± 0.006 g/cm(2), respectively (p < 0.05-0.005). No association with postmenopausal changes in bone mass and fracture risk and no overall interaction with the effects of hormone therapy could be demonstrated for any of the polymorphisms in COLIA1., Conclusions: The -1997G/T polymorphism and haplotype 3 are significantly associated with perimenopausal bone mass, and these effects were sustained up to 10 years after menopause. No association between the -1663indelT or +1245G/T polymorphisms and peri- or postmenopausal bone mass could be demonstrated.

In the Dosing IntraVenous Administration (DIVA) study, IV ibandronate injections (15-30 s duration) provided significantly greater gains in bone mineral density than daily oral ibandronate (P<0.001). Single transiliac bone biopsy was performed in a subgroup of women (n=109/1395) from DIVA to assess the impact of ibandronate on newly formed bone and bone remodeling. Patients received ibandronate IV injections 2 mg every 2 months, 3 mg every 3 months or oral ibandronate 2.5 mg daily, plus oral or IV placebo, as appropriate to maintain blinding. Of the 1395 participants from the DIVA study, 122 were enrolled in the substudy. Qualitative histological analysis was performed on all biopsy cores and 89 cores were considered to be evaluable for quantitative histomorphometry. Following 2 years of ibandronate treatment, trabecular bone maintained its normal lamellar structure with no evidence of woven bone, marrow fibrosis, cellular toxicity, or other qualitative abnormalities. Primary mineralization of new bone remained normal, as indicated by the slightly lower osteoid thickness and osteoid volume, with normal mineral apposition rate compared to healthy, postmenopausal women. Mineralizing surface, osteoid surface, activation frequency and bone formation rate were decreased in all ibandronate-treated groups compared with values from healthy, postmenopausal women. Specifically, the bone formation rate (BFR/BV and BFR/BS) was approximately 5 times lower in the ibandronate-treated (3 mg) group than in healthy, postmenopausal women. Histomorphometric analysis of transiliac bone biopsies demonstrated normal micro-structure of newly formed bone with normal mineralization and reduced remodeling after oral or IV ibandronate.

Both osteoporosis and hip geometry are independently associated with fracture risk. There is a significant genetic contribution to the risk of osteoporosis, and evidence provided by twin studies has suggested that hip geometry may also in part be genetically programmed. Polymorphisms in a number of genes, including those coding for methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR c.677C > T), the purinergic P2X(7) receptor (Glu496Ala and Ile568Asn), and the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5 exon 9 [c.266A > G]), have been associated with an increased fracture incidence and/or reduced bone mineral density (BMD). The aim of the present study was to test whether these polymorphisms influence hip structural geometry in perimenopausal women. The four polymorphisms were genotyped in 800 healthy recently perimenopausal women never using hormone replacement therapy. BMD of the femoral neck was measured using a Hologic QDR-2000 densitometer and femoral neck axis length, neck width, neck shaft angle, and femoral head diameter were measured from the screen images. Genotype frequencies were compatible with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. No significant differences between homozygotes for the minor allele and carriers of the common allele regarding parameters of hip geometry were demonstrated. According to the anthropometric characteristics of the subjects, only body height in the MTHFR TT genotype group was significantly different from the combined CT/CC genotype group (P < 0.05). The geometric dimensions of the proximal femur in perimenopausal women are not associated with the MTHFR c.677C > T, P2X(7) (Glu496Ala), P2X(7) (Ile568Asn), and LRP5 exon 9 (c.266A > G) polymorphisms.

Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) is a quantitative 3-dimensional (3D) scanning procedure used to assess trabecular architecture. In the 3-yr oral iBandronate Osteoporosis vertebral fracture trial in North America and Europe (BONE) study, it was found that oral ibandronate administered daily (2.5 mg) or intermittently (20 mg) significantly reduced vertebral fracture risk by 62% (p=0.0001) and 50% (p=0.0006), respectively, vs placebo. Two-dimensional histomorphometric analysis of BONE study biopsies indicated that newly formed bone was of normal quality. In the current analysis, micro-CT was used to assess 3D trabecular microarchitecture. Rod and plate distribution was quantified by differential analysis of the triangulated bone surface. Biopsies were obtained from 110 patients, with 84 evaluable by micro-CT. Median structural model index (SMI; a lower SMI indicates an increased ratio of plates to rods and thus, improved trabecular microarchitecture) was 1.001 with ibandronate vs 1.365 with placebo (90% confidence interval [CI] for difference in medians: -0.626, -0.033), and connectivity density was higher in ibandronate-treated patients (median: 3.904 vs 3.112/mm3, 90% CI for difference in medians: 0.159, 1.517). This indicates that trabecular microarchitecture was better preserved in patients receiving ibandronate than placebo. Taken together with previous results from BONE, these findings indicate that ibandronate treatment preserves bone strength by maintaining good quality trabecular microarchitecture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Sex steroids are important physiologic regulators of bone mass, and genes regulating sex steroid production and metabolism are obvious as candidate genes for osteoporosis susceptibility. We present data from a study of 1795 recent postmenopausal women, assigned to either hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or no treatment and followed for 5 years. The association between bone mass measurements and two single nucleotide polymorphisms, a T (A1) to C (A2) transition in the 5'-UTR of the cytochrome P450c17alpha (CYP17) gene and a G (Val) to A (Met) transition in exon 4 of the catechol- O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene, was evaluated. Association with CYP17 genotype was modified by body mass index (BMI). In lean women, individuals homozygous for the CYP17 A2 allele were 1 cm shorter and had lower baseline BMD (bone mineral density), BMC, and CSA (cross sectional area) in the spine and femoral neck than did other women (BMD spine A2A2: 0.975 g/cm2 versus 1.011 g/cm2 in A1A1 + A1A2, P = 0.002). Conversely, an adverse association with A2A2 and bone loss over 5 years seemed present only in overweight women, but differences were small. Response to HRT was not dependent on CYP17 genotype. COMT genotype was not associated with bone mass at baseline, bone loss in untreated women, or response to HRT. In conclusion, the A2 allele of the CYP17 T(27)-C polymorphism is associated with reduced bone mass and bone size in lean perimenopausal women, whereas high BMI protects against this negative association. The COMT G(1947)-A polymorphism is not associated with bone parameters in this study.

Polymorphisms in the androgen receptor ( AR) gene and genes encoding enzymes involved in synthesis of sex steroids (e.g., the CYP19 gene encoding aromatase) have recently received attention in osteoporosis research. In the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study, recent postmenopausal women were allocated to either hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or no treatment. We genotyped 1792 women for the CYP19 (TTTA)(n) repeat [short (TTTA)(n 7)] the CYP19 C(1558)-T, and the AR (CAG)(n) repeat polymorphism [short (CAG)(n < 22), long (CAG)(n >or= 22)], and investigated associations with bone mineral density (BMD) and 5-year change in BMD. The CYP19 polymorphisms were in strong linkage disequilibrium. Perimenopausal bone mass or bone loss in untreated women was not associated with the CYP19 polymorphisms. In hormone-treated women, BMD increase in the femoral neck was highest (+0.3%/year) for long CYP19 alleles, lowest (-0.09%/year) for short alleles, and intermediate (-0.002%/year) in heterozygous women, P = 0.015. Differences were also significant in the lumbar spine, total hip, and ultradistal forearm. The C(1558)-T T-allele was associated with a more pronounced response to HRT ( P = 0.04, total hip). AR genotype was not related to BMD, but a modifying effect of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) was present. In the highest SHBG quartile (SHBG > 95 nmol/1, n = 222), AR genotype was associated with baseline BMD (femoral neck: P < 0.001, total hip: P = 0.008), but without a clear gene dosage effect. We have demonstrated that polymorphisms in the CYP19 gene are associated with the magnitude of bone gain in response to HRT and that the (CAG)(n) repeat polymorphism in the AR gene is associated with bone mass in women with high levels of SHBG. These findings emphasize the complexity of the genetics of bone mass and bone loss.

Hyperthyroidism is characterized by increased bone turnover and resorptive activity. Similar changes in remodeling are seen in osteoporosis. To study the pathogenetic role of thyroid hormone in osteoporosis, we measured concentrations of free and total thyroid hormones and investigated the sensitivity of the skeleton toward thyroid hormones in 14 osteoporotic, 16 estrogen-treated, and 15 normal postmenopausal women with comparable thyroid status. Triiodothyronine (T3, 60 microg/day for 7 days) was administered to the three groups. The skeletal response was assessed by monitoring bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), osteocalcin (BGP), and pyridinium cross-linked telopeptide domain of type I collagen (ICTP) in serum and urinary excretion of hydroxyproline (OHP), pyridinoline (PYR), and deoxypyridinoline (DPR) at days 0, 8, 15, and 57. Women on estrogen replacement therapy exhibited lower bone turnover than the normal postmenopausal women. Markers of bone formation were reduced by 19-43% and markers of resorption by 22-48%. The osteoporotic women displayed lower bone mass at the lumbar spine and the distal forearm (p < 0.01-0.001), but the levels of biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption were comparable to values obtained in the normal postmenopausal women. T3 stimulation caused significant increases (p values ranging between 0.05-0.001) in all three groups of the resorptive markers: ICTP (47%, 47%, 45%), OHP (29%, 30%, 33%), PYR (43%, 27%, 51%), and DPR (42%, 24%, 59%). Of the formative markers, only BGP increased significantly (32%, 40%, 47%) (p < 0.001). At day 57, however, all three formative markers increased compared with day 15 (p < 0.05-0.001). No significant differences in bone markers were demonstrated between groups. In the osteoporotic group, as the only group, serum calcium increased (p < 0.05) and serum PTH fell (p < 0.05). In conclusion, osteoporosis and estrogen substitution are not characterized by altered concentrations of thyroid hormones or responsiveness to thyroid hormones at the level of individual bone cells; however, altered responses pertaining to PTH and calcium were detected.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has been the method of choice for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis since the early 1990s. Although a number of routes of administration are now available, HRT is still predominantly administered orally. In the United States, HRT formulations traditionally comprise conjugated equine estrogens. In Europe, however, HRT preparations tend to be based on 17 beta-estradiol, a natural human estrogen. Furthermore, distinct patterns of HRT use are apparent based on the age of the woman receiving it. Current recommendations are that early postmenopausal women (in their early 50s) receive sequential combined estrogen/progestogen therapy with continued monthly bleeds, while in women who are at least 1 year postmenopausal, continuous combined HRT, which leads to endometrial atrophy and cessation of monthly bleeding, is preferred. Clinical experience to date clearly demonstrates that long-term HRT unequivocally increases bone mass and reduces the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women, with no significant differences between sequential and continuous combined prescribing regimens. Data demonstrating that antiestrogens such as tamoxifen may preserve bone mass have led to the initiation of large-scale trials to determine the potential clinical utility of such agents for the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Nonhormonal therapeutic approaches are now also available, most notably bisphosphonates and vitamin D analogs. At present, however, traditional HRT remains the regimen of choice for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, given its additional beneficial effects on acute menopausal symptoms, as well as on the cardiovascular system and brain.