Search

The 24 th Annual Santa Fe Bone Symposium (SFBS) was held in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, on August 2-3, 2024. This was a "hybrid" meeting, with in-person and real-time remote participants representing a broad range of geographical locations and medical disciplines. The focus was on new developments in the care of patients with osteoporosis, other metabolic bone diseases, and inherited skeletal disorders. The most current medical evidence was presented and discussed with consideration of implications for patient management. Topics included an update on clinical uses of osteoanabolic agents, management of patients discontinuing denosumab, bone health optimization for orthopedic surgery, estrogen and testosterone in the management of osteoporosis, osteoporosis treatment in the very old, overview of rare bone diseases, treat-to-target for osteoporosis, and a progress report on global activities of Bone Health ECHO. There were two highly interactive faculty panel discussions - one with case presentations by attendees and another with open microphone for all topics of interest. Endocrinology fellows, selected from attendees of the Santa Fe Fellows Workshop on Metabolic Bone Diseases, held the two days preceding the SFBS, participated with presentations of oral abstracts. Ancillary events addressed modern approaches to menopause and bone health, case studies of management of patients at very high fracture risk, and management of patients with rare bone diseases, such as hypophosphatasia, fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, X-linked hypophosphatemia, and hypoparathyroidism. These proceedings of the SFBS present the clinical highlights of the plenary sessions and the discussions that followed., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The overarching goal of osteoporosis management is to prevent fractures. A goal-directed approach to long-term management of fracture risk helps ensure that the most appropriate initial treatment and treatment sequence is selected for individual patients. Goal-directed treatment decisions require assessment of clinical fracture history, vertebral fracture identification (using vertebral imaging as appropriate), measurement of bone mineral density (BMD), and consideration of other major clinical risk factors. Treatment targets should be tailored to each patient's individual risk profile and based on the specific indication for beginning treatment, including recency, site, number and severity of prior fractures, and BMD levels at the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine. Instead of first-line bisphosphonate treatment for all patients, selection of initial treatment should focus on reducing fracture risk rapidly for patients at very high and imminent risk, such as in those with recent fractures. Initial treatment selection should also consider the probability that a BMD treatment target can be attained within a reasonable period of time and the differential magnitude of fracture risk reduction and BMD impact with osteoanabolic versus antiresorptive therapy. This position statement of the ASBMR/BHOF Task Force on Goal-Directed Osteoporosis Treatment provides an overall summary of the major clinical recommendations about treatment targets and strategies to achieve those targets based on the best evidence available, derived primarily from studies in older postmenopausal women of European ancestry., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Background: Osteoporosis patient education is offered in many countries worldwide. When evaluating complex interventions like these, it is important to understand how and why the intervention leads to effects. This study aimed to develop a program theory of osteoporosis patient education in Danish municipalities with a focus on examining the mechanisms of change i.e. what is about the programs that generate change., Methods: The program theory was developed in an iterative process. The initial draft was based on a previous published systematic review, and subsequently the draft was continually refined based on findings from observations (10 h during osteoporosis patient education) and interviews (individual interviews with six employees in municipalities and three health professionals at hospitals, as well as four focus group interviews with participants in patient education (in total 27 informants)). The transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and with inspiration from realist evaluation the mechanisms as well as the contextual factors and outcomes were examined., Results: Based on this qualitative study we developed a program theory of osteoporosis patient education and identified four mechanisms: motivation, recognizability, reassurance, and peer reflection. For each mechanism we examined how contextual factors activated the mechanism as well as which outcomes were achieved. For instance, the participants' motivation is activated when they meet in groups, and thereafter outcomes such as more physical activity may be achieved. Recognizability is activated by the participants' course of disease, which may lead to better ergonomic habits. Reassurance may result in more physical activity, and this mechanism is activated in newly diagnosed participants without previous fractures. Peer reflection is activated when the participants meet in groups, and the outcome healthier diet may be achieved., Conclusions: We developed a program theory and examined how and why osteoporosis patient education is likely to be effective. Understanding these prerequisites is important for future implementation and evaluation of osteoporosis patient education., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The role of integrating genomic scores (GSs) needs to be assessed. Adding a GS to recommended stratification tools does not improve the prediction of very low bone mineral density. However, we noticed that the GS performed equally or above individual risk factors in discrimination., Purpose: We aimed to investigate whether adding a genomic score (GS) to recommended stratification tools improves the discrimination of participants with very low bone mineral density (BMD)., Methods: BMD was measured in three thoracic vertebrae using CT. All participants provided information on standard osteoporosis risk factors. GSs and FRAX scores were calculated. Participants were grouped according to mean BMD into very low (<80 mg/cm 3 ), low (80-120 mg/cm 3 ), and normal (>120 mg/cm 3 ) and according to the Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation recommendations for BMD testing into an "indication for BMD testing" and "no indication for BMD testing" group. Different models were assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC) and reclassification analyses., Results: In the total cohort (n=1421), the AUC for the GS was 0.57 (95% CI 0.52-0.61) corresponding to AUCs for osteoporosis risk factors. In participants without indication for BMD testing, the AUC was 0.60 (95% CI 0.52-0.69) above or equal to AUCs for osteoporosis risk factors. Adding the GS to a clinical risk factor (CRF) model resulted in AUCs not statistically significant from the CRF model. Using probability cutoff values of 6, 12, and 24%, we found no improved reclassification or risk discrimination using the CRF-GS model compared to the CRF model., Conclusion: Our results suggest adding a GS to a CRF model does not improve prediction. However, we noticed that the GS performed equally or above individual risk factors in discrimination. Clinical risk factors combined showed superior discrimination to individual risk factors and the GS, underlining the value of combined CRFs in routine clinics as a stratification tool., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: To review the comparative effectiveness of osteoporosis treatments, including the bone anabolic agents, abaloparatide and romosozumab, on reducing the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women, and to characterise the effect of antiosteoporosis drug treatments on the risk of fractures according to baseline risk factors., Design: Systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trials., Data Sources: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify randomised controlled trials published between 1 January 1996 and 24 November 2021 that examined the effect of bisphosphonates, denosumab, selective oestrogen receptor modulators, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, and romosozumab compared with placebo or active comparator., Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Randomised controlled trials that included non-Asian postmenopausal women with no restriction on age, when interventions looked at bone quality in a broad perspective. The primary outcome was clinical fractures. Secondary outcomes were vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, and major osteoporotic fractures, all cause mortality, adverse events, and serious cardiovascular adverse events., Results: The results were based on 69 trials (>80 000 patients). For clinical fractures, synthesis of the results showed a protective effect of bisphosphonates, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, and romosozumab compared with placebo. Compared with parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, bisphosphonates were less effective in reducing clinical fractures (odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 2.00). Compared with parathyroid hormone receptor agonists and romosozumab, denosumab was less effective in reducing clinical fractures (odds ratio 1.85, 1.18 to 2.92 for denosumab v parathyroid hormone receptor agonists and 1.56, 1.02 to 2.39 for denosumab v romosozumab). An effect of all treatments on vertebral fractures compared with placebo was found. In the active treatment comparisons, denosumab, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, and romosozumab were more effective than oral bisphosphonates in preventing vertebral fractures. The effect of all treatments was unaffected by baseline risk indicators, except for antiresorptive treatments that showed a greater reduction of clinical fractures compared with placebo with increasing mean age (number of studies=17; β=0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 0.99). No harm outcomes were seen. The certainty in the effect estimates was moderate to low for all individual outcomes, mainly because of limitations in reporting, nominally indicating a serious risk of bias and imprecision., Conclusions: The evidence indicated a benefit of a range of treatments for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women for clinical and vertebral fractures. Bone anabolic treatments were more effective than bisphosphonates in the prevention of clinical and vertebral fractures, irrespective of baseline risk indicators. Hence this analysis provided no clinical evidence for restricting the use of anabolic treatment to patients with a very high risk of fractures., Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42019128391., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare support from UCB and Amgen for the submitted work: MNH, IC, CvB, JFR, AU, SMN, and RC report grants from UCB and Amgen paid to the Parker Institute to conduct the study; J-JB reports personal fees from UCB during the conduct of the study and personal fees from UCB and Sandoz outside the submitted work; MLB reports fees as honorarium, speaker, grants, and consultant from Amgen, Bruno Farmaceutici, Calcilytix, Kyowa Kirin, UCB, Abiogen, Alexion, Echolight, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Kirin, SPA, Theramex, and Amolyt outside the submitted work; AD-P has received speaker fees from Amgen, Lilly, and Theramex and is a shareholder of Active Life; PH reports personal fees from UCB during the conduct of the study and personal fees from UCB, Amgen, Gedeon Richter, Stada, and Theramex outside the submitted work; MKJ reports personal fees and non-financial support from UCB during the conduct of the study, and grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Amgen and UCB outside the submitted work; MKJ was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and the views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health; WFL reports speakers fee/advisory board from UCB, Amgen, Pfizer, and Lilly; XN has received fees for consulting from UCB and Amgen and for lectures from UCB, Amgen, and Lilly; CR reports personal fees from UCB during the conduct of the study, and grants and personal fees from Alexion, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Amgen outside the submitted work; SM reports fees as speaker and advisory board from Abiogen, Amgen, Bruno Farmaceutici, Diasorin, Eli Lilly, Shire, Sandoz, Takeda, Abiogen, Kyowa Kirin, Pfizer and UCB outside the submitted work; TT reports personal fees from UCB during the conduct of the study, personal fees from Amgen, Arrow, and Biogen, personal fees from Grunenthal, Jansen, LCA, Lilly, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Thuasne, and Theramex, grants and personal fees from Chugai and UCB, and grants from Bone Therapeutics outside the submitted work; SLF reports grants from Amgen, consulting and lecture honorarium from UCB, consulting honorarium from Radius, and grants and consulting honorarium from Agnovos outside the submitted work; DP-A's department received consultancy fees related to this work, DP-A reports grants and fees for speaker services and advisory board membership from Amgen, grants, non-financial support, and fees for consultancy services from UCB Biopharma, grants from Les Laboratoires Servier and UCB outside the submitted work, DP-A is an HTA Funding Committee membership, and Janssen, on behalf of Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) funded European Health Data and Evidence Network (EHDEN) and European Medical Information Framework (EMIF) consortiums, and Synapse Management Partners, have supported training programmes organised by DP-A's department that are open to external participants; BL reports personal fees from UCB during the conduct of the study and BL has received funding to her institution from Amgen and Novo Nordisk and personal fees from Amgen, UCB, Eli Lilly, Gedeon-Richter, and Gilead outside the submitted work; BA reports personal fees from UCB during the conduct of the study, grants and personal fees from UCB and Kyowa-Kirin UK, personal fees from Amgen, grants from Novartis, and grants and personal fees from Pharmacosmos outside the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), is a potent inhibitor of osteoclast differentiation and activity. As the first biologic drug used to treat osteoporosis, denosumab has shown potent anti-resorptive properties and anti-fracture efficacy. The effects of this drug are also unique compared with the effects of bisphosphonates: namely, long-term treatment with this drug results in a continuous gain of bone mineral density, whereas withdrawal of the drug results in a transient overshoot in bone turnover and rapid bone loss. Although the mechanisms for these specific effects remain incompletely understood, emerging experimental and clinical data have started to highlight potential biological and pharmacological mechanisms by which denosumab might affect osteoclasts, as well as osteoblasts, and cause both sustained bone gain and bone loss upon treatment cessation. This Perspective discusses those potential mechanisms and the future studies and clinical implications that might ensue from these findings., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Aim: We aimed to improve bone health management of children with cerebral palsy (CP) by reviewing studies investigating bisphosphonate therapy in children with CP and other types of secondary osteoporosis., Methods: We included trials on bisphosphonate treatment reporting any direct bone measurement or fracture outcome. All studies of patients with CP were included. We also included all controlled trials of children with secondary bone fragility as well as observational studies with ≥20 participants or at least 3 years of follow-up. Studies were assessed according to PRISMA guidelines using the RoB2-tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale., Results: We reviewed 1104 studies and found 37 eligible. Some studies were sufficiently homogeneous to include in a meta-analysis, and we found a 1-year effect on lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score of +0.65 after oral and + 1.21 after intravenous bisphosphonates in children with secondary osteoporosis. Further, data on adverse events and post-treatment follow-up were reviewed. Limitations were heterogeneity and small size of the included studies., Conclusion: Meta-analysis consistently showed significant BMD increases with bisphosphonates in children with secondary osteoporosis. Direct evidence of the effect of bisphosphonates on reducing fractures is lacking. We found no reports of long-term adverse events yet longer studies are needed., (© 2023 The Authors. Acta Paediatrica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Paediatrica.)

Postmenopausal women are at significant risk for osteoporotic fractures due to their rapid bone loss. Half of all postmenopausal women will get an osteoporosis-related fracture over their lifetime, with 25% developing a spine deformity and 15% developing a hip fracture. By 2050, more than half of all osteoporotic fractures will occur in Asia, with postmenopausal women being the most susceptible. Early management can halt or even reverse the progression of osteoporosis. Consequently, on October 31, 2020, the Taiwanese Osteoporosis Association hosted the Asia-Pacific (AP) Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Fracture Prevention (POFP) consensus meeting, which was supported by the Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies (AFOS) and the Asia Pacific Osteoporosis Foundation (APOF). International and domestic experts developed ten applicable statements for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women with low bone mass or osteoporosis but no fragility fractures in the AP region. The experts advocated, for example, that postmenopausal women with a high fracture risk be reimbursed for pharmaceutical therapy to prevent osteoporotic fractures. More clinical experience and data are required to modify intervention tactics., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Chih-Hsing Wu received honoraria for lectures, attending meetings, and/or travel from Eli Lilly, Roche, Amgen, Merck, Servier laboratories, GE Lunar, Harvester, TCM Biotech, and Alvogen/Lotus. E Michael Lewiecki is an investigator, consultant, and speaker for Amgen, and an investigator for Radius., (Copyright © 2023 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Glucocorticoids constitute a considerable risk for developing osteoporosis in both younger and older adults. However, currently available bone imaging modalities and fracture-risk assessment tools do not adequately capture the dramatic changes in bone microarchitecture, heterogeneity of glucocorticoid exposure, the impact of chronic disease and other osteoporosis risk factors on the assessment of osteoporosis in these individuals., Design: A narrative review is presented, following a systematic search of the literature from 2000 to 2021., Results: Our current appreciation of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) is focused on older populations, with limited evidence to guide the investigation, risk assessment and treatment in premenopausal women and men less than 50 years. The impact of the underlying chronic disease on secondary osteoporosis in these younger adults is also poorly understood., Conclusion: Through this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of and recommendations for optimising the management of this common cause of secondary osteoporosis younger and older adults., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Vertebral fractures (VFs) are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture, and their prevalence and severity are key risk factors for future fragility fractures. Here, we assess the treatment effect of romosozumab on the incidence of new on-study VFs according to Genant severity grades (mild, moderate, and severe). Data are reported from two phase 3 clinical studies for patients who received romosozumab versus placebo through 12 months, followed by denosumab through 24 months (FRAME: NCT01575834), and for patients who received romosozumab through 12 months, followed by alendronate through 24 months, versus alendronate only through 24 months (ARCH: NCT01631214). The treatment effect of romosozumab is reported for all included patients, and for patients with prevalent and severe baseline VFs. The incidence of new moderate-or-severe VFs was reduced through 12 months for patients treated with romosozumab versus placebo (FRAME; 0.25% versus 1.42%, respectively; p < 0.001) or alendronate (ARCH; 2.78% versus 4.00%, respectively; p = 0.042). Furthermore, the treatment effect of romosozumab on the incidence of new VFs across moderate and severe severity grades was independent of baseline VF prevalence or severity; through 12 months, consistent reductions in new moderate-or-severe VFs were observed regardless of prevalent (FRAME; p = 0.18) or severe (ARCH; p = 0.52) VFs at baseline. Reductions in the incidence of new moderate and severe VFs were sustained through 24 months, after transition from romosozumab to denosumab or alendronate, independent of baseline VF prevalence or severity; no significant interactions were observed between the incidence of new moderate-or-severe VFs and the presence of prevalent (FRAME; p = 0.81) or severe (ARCH; p = 0.99) VFs at baseline. With increasing recommendations for initial treatment with bone-forming agents for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, these analyses will help to inform treatment decisions for patients at very high risk of VF., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Increased bone turnover and rapid bone loss follow discontinuation of denosumab. We investigated the long-term efficacy of zoledronate (ZOL) in maintaining bone mineral density (BMD) after discontinuation of denosumab. In this randomized, open-label, interventional study, we included 61 postmenopausal women and men older than 50 years discontinuing denosumab after 4.6 ± 1.6 years. We administered ZOL 6 months (6 M) or 9 months (9 M) after the last denosumab or when bone turnover had increased (observation group [OBS]). ZOL was readministrated if p-cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide (p-CTX) increased ≥1.26 μg/L or BMD decreased ≥5%. The results after 12 months have previously been published; here we report the outcome after 24 months (ClinicalTrials NCT03087851). Fifty-eight patients completed the study. From 12 to 24 months after the initial ZOL, lumbar spine (LS) BMD was maintained: 0.9 ± 0.9%, 0.4 ± 0.8%, and 0.3 ± 0.7% in the 6 M, 9 M, and OBS groups, respectively (p > .05, no between-group differences). Similarly, total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN) BMD did not change in any group during year 2. From baseline to 24 months after ZOL, LS BMD decreased by 4.0 ± 0.8%, 4.1 ± 0.8%, and 4.3 ± 1.5% in the 6 M, 9 M, and OBS groups, respectively (p < .001, no between-group differences). Significant bone loss (LS, TH, or FN) was found in all groups 24 months after ZOL: 6 M group: n = 12 (60%), 9 M group: n = 7 (37%), and OBS group: n = 10 (53%). P-CTX did not change significantly during the second year (p > .05, no between-group differences). No patient fulfilled the CTX or fracture criteria for retreatment during year 2; however, 9 patients were retreated at M24 due to BMD loss ≥5%. Two patients sustained a non-vertebral fracture during year 2. Treatment with ZOL subsequent to long-term denosumab did not fully prevent increased bone turnover and bone loss during the first year; however, CTX remained with the reference range and BMD was maintained during the second year. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)., (© 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).)

Odanacatib (ODN) was investigated as an osteoporosis treatment in 292 men. Compared with placebo, odanacatib improved bone mineral density and led to sustained bone resorption decreases while producing relatively little bone formation reduction that leveled off with time. However, increased risk of stroke in another study stopped further odanacatib development., Introduction: ODN, a selective oral cathepsin K inhibitor, was in development for osteoporosis treatment. This phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 24-month study investigated ODN safety and efficacy in men with osteoporosis., Methods: Men with idiopathic osteoporosis or osteoporosis due to hypogonadism and a lumbar spine or hip (total hip [TH], femoral neck [FN], or trochanter) bone mineral density (BMD) T-score of ≤ - 2.5 to ≥ - 4.0 without prior vertebral fracture or ≤ - 1.5 to ≥ - 4.0 with one prior vertebral fracture were randomized (1:1) to once-weekly ODN 50 mg or placebo. All received 5600 IU vitamin D 3 weekly and calcium supplementation as needed (≥ 1200 mg daily). The primary efficacy outcome was changed from baseline in lumbar spine BMD versus placebo., Results: Overall, 292 men, mean age 68.8 years, were randomly assigned to ODN or placebo. Versus placebo, ODN increased BMD from baseline at the lumbar spine, TH, FN, and trochanter by 5.6%, 2.0%, 1.7%, and 2.1%, respectively (all p < 0.01), and decreased uNTx/Cr (68%, p < 0.001), sCTx (77%, p < 0.001), sP1NP (16%, p = 0.001), and sBSAP (8%, p = 0.019). The between-group bone formation marker decrease peaked at 3 months, then returned toward baseline. The safety profile, including cardiovascular events, was similar between groups., Conclusion: Though a promising osteoporosis therapy for men, ODN development was discontinued due to increased risk of stroke in the LOFT phase 3 trial., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01120600 (registered May 11, 2010).

Discontinuing denosumab is associated with bone loss and possibly increased fracture risk. We investigated if treatment with zoledronate (ZOL) could prevent bone loss and if the timing of the ZOL infusion influenced the outcome. We report on a 2-year randomized, open label, interventional study including 61 patients with osteopenia, discontinuing denosumab after 4.6 ± 1.6 years. We administrated ZOL 6 months (6M group, n = 20) or 9 months (9M group, n = 20) after the last denosumab injection or when bone turnover had increased (OBS group, n = 21). We monitored the patients with DXA and bone turnover markers. Our primary endpoints were change in lumbar spine BMD (LSBMD) 6 months after ZOL and the proportion of patients who failed to maintain BMD. The study is ongoing (clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03087851). We included 61 participants and 59 patients completed follow-up 12 months after ZOL. Six months after ZOL, LSBMD had decreased significantly by (mean ± SE) 2.1% ± 0.9%, 4.3% ± 1.1%, and 3.0% ± 1.1% in the 6M, 9M, and OBS groups, respectively, and by 4.8% ± 0.7%, 4.1% ± 1.1%, and 4.7% ± 1.2% 12 months after ZOL in the 6M, 9M, and OBS groups, respectively (p < .02, no between-group differences). BMD loss above the least significant change was seen in all groups; at the spine: 6M, n = 6 (30%); 9M, n = 9 (45%); and OBS, n = 9 (47%); and at the total hip: 6M, n = 1 (5%); 9M, n = 5 (25%); and OBS, n = 2 (11%). In the 6M group p-crosslinked C-terminal telopeptide (p-CTX) decreased initially, but increased rapidly thereafter, and 6 months after ZOL, p-CTX was 0.60 ± 0.08 g/L. p-CTX increased rapidly in the 9M and OBS groups, was suppressed by ZOL but increased again thereafter; p-CTX was 0.47 ± 0.05 μg/L and 0.47 ± 0.05 μg/L in the 9M and OBS groups 6 months after ZOL, respectively. Incident vertebral fractures were seen in two women in the 9M group. Treatment with ZOL irrespective of the timing did not fully prevent loss of BMD in patients discontinuing denosumab. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research., (© 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Efficient therapies are available for the treatment of osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates and denosumab are the most commonly used antiresorptive therapies. Despite differences in the increase in bone mineral density seen with these drugs, the reductions in fracture risk are similar; 50-70%, 20%, and 40% for vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures, respectively. The bone-forming treatments; teriparatide and abaloparatide increase bone mineral density more than the antiresorptives and the reductions in fracture risk are 85% and 40-50% for vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, respectively, compared to placebo. The VERO study demonstrated a >50% reduction in vertebral and clinical fractures in women treated with teriparatide compared to risedronate. The dual-action treatment; romosozumab leads to more pronounced increases in BMD than other treatment modalities and reduces the risk of vertebral and clinical fractures by 73% and 36% compared to placebo after 12 months and the sequential treatment regime; romosozumab for 12 months followed by alendronate reduced the risk of vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures by 48%, 20% and 38%, respectively compared to alendronate after 2-3 years. The evidence for combination therapy targeting both resorption and formation is limited as only short-term studies with BMD as the endpoint have been performed. All bone-forming and dual-action treatments increase BMD and reduce the fracture risk, however, the effect wears off with time and treatment is therefore only temporary and should be followed by antiresorptive treatment with a bisphosphonate or denosumab. The sequence of treatment matters as the BMD response to teriparatide is reduced in patients previously treated with bisphosphonates; however, based on the findings of the VERO trial, the anti-fracture efficacy of bone-forming treatment in comparison with risedronate seems to be preserved after bisphosphonate therapy. The DATA study suggested that transitioning from denosumab to teriparatide is problematic due to the increase in bone resorption occurring after stopping denosumab. Studies have shown further improvements in BMD when transitioning from oral bisphosphonates to zoledronic acid or denosumab. Management of osteoporosis will in many patients include a long-term treatment plan. This will often include sequential therapy which in severe cases preferably should start with bone-forming followed by antiresorptive treatment. The severity of osteoporosis, reaching a treatment goal, and responding to treatment failure are important factors determining the treatment sequence in the individual patient., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: Consensus regarding diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in premenopausal women (PW) is still lacking due to few studies carried out in this population., Design: The European Calcified Tissue Society and the International Osteoporosis Foundation convened a working group to produce an updated review of literature published after 2017 on this topic., Results: Fragility fractures in PW are rare and mostly due to secondary osteoporosis (ie, in presence of an underlying disease such as hormonal, inflammatory, or digestive disorders). In absence of another disorder, low bone mineral density (BMD) together with fragility fractures qualifies as idiopathic osteoporosis. In contrast, low BMD alone does not necessarily represent osteoporosis in absence of bone microarchitectural abnormalities. BMD increases in PW with osteoporosis when the underlying disease is treated. For example, in celiac disease, an increase of 9% in radius trabecular volumetric density was achieved after 1 year of gluten-free diet, while anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha improved BMD in PW with inflammatory bowel diseases. In amenorrhea, including anorexia nervosa, appropriately delivered estrogen replacement therapy can also improve BMD. Alternatively, antiresorptive or anabolic therapy has been shown to improve BMD in a variety of conditions, the range of improvement (3%-16%) depending on skeletal site and the nature of the secondary cause. No studies were powered to demonstrate fracture reduction. The effects of bisphosphonates in childbearing women have been scantly studied and caution is needed., Conclusion: The majority of PW with osteoporosis have an underlying disease. Specific therapy of these diseases, as well as antiresorptive and anabolic drugs, improve BMD, but without evidence of fracture reduction., (© Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Odanacatib (ODN), a selective oral inhibitor of cathepsin K, was an investigational agent previously in development for the treatment of osteoporosis. In this analysis, the effects of ODN on bone remodeling/modeling and structure were examined in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven, Phase 3, Long-term Odanacatib Fracture Trial (LOFT; NCT00529373) and planned double-blind extension in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A total of 386 transilial bone biopsies, obtained from consenting patients at baseline (ODN n = 17, placebo n = 23), month 24 (ODN n = 112, placebo n = 104), month 36 (ODN n = 42, placebo n = 41), and month 60 (ODN n = 27, placebo n = 20) were assessed by dynamic and static bone histomorphometry. Patient characteristics at baseline and BMD changes over 5 years for this subset were comparable to the overall LOFT population. Qualitative assessment of biopsies revealed no abnormalities. Consistent with the mechanism of ODN, osteoclast number was higher with ODN versus placebo over time. Regarding bone remodeling, dynamic bone formation indices in trabecular, intracortical, and endocortical surfaces were generally similar in ODN-treated versus placebo-treated patients after 2 years of treatment. Regarding periosteal modeling, the proportion of patients with periosteal double labels and the bone formation indices increased over time in the ODN-treated patients compared with placebo. This finding supported the observed numerical increase in cortical thickness at month 60 versus placebo. In conclusion, ODN treatment for 5 years did not reduce bone remodeling and increased the proportion of patients with periosteal bone formation. These results are consistent with the mechanism of action of ODN, and are associated with continued BMD increases and reduced risk of fractures compared with placebo in the LOFT Phase 3 fracture trial. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research., (© 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Objective: Osteoporosis is reported as a common comorbidity in patients living with HIV (PLHIV). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the evidence on fracture risk in PLHIV, bone mineral density (BMD) in PLHIV compared with controls, longitudinal changes in BMD in PLHIV, and effect of antiosteoporosis treatment in PLHIV., Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using the databases Medline at PubMed and EMBASE using the search terms: "HIV" and "fracture" or "bone turnover," or "bone mineral density." Eligibility criteria followed the aim of the study and include randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Two reviewers extracted the data independently. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model assessing fracture risk, BMD compared with controls, and changes in BMD., Results: One hundred forty-two of 2397 papers identified were included in the systematic review, and subsequently, 84 were included in the meta-analysis. The risks of a fragility fracture [1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.41 to 1.63] and hip fracture (4.05, 95% CI: 2.99 to 5.49) were increased. PLHIV have lower BMD at the hip (z-score -0.31, 95% CI: -0.46 to -0.27) and lumbar spine (z-score -0.36, 95% CI: -0.39 to -0.15) compared with controls. The reduced BMD did not fully explain the increased fracture risk in PLHIV., Conclusions: Current management of osteoporosis in PLHIV follows general osteoporosis guidelines; however, the increased fracture risk is not fully explained by lower BMD, and thus, antiosteoporosis intervention may be beneficial at a higher BMD in PLHIV.

In patients with osteoporosis and severely reduced bone mass and/or recurring fractures, antiresorptive therapy may not be the optimal first-line treatment. Two recent clinical trials comparing bone-forming treatment with antiresorptive therapy have demonstrated that bone-forming treatment is superior in reducing the fracture risk in patients with severe osteoporosis. All of the currently available bone-forming agents-teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab-increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the fracture risk; however, the effect wears off with time and treatment is therefore only transient. Thus, a bone-forming therapy should be followed by antiresorptive treatment with a bisphosphonate or denosumab. The BMD response to bone-forming treatment is reduced in patients previously treated with antiresorptive drugs; however, based on the findings of the VERO trial, the anti-fracture efficacy of bone-forming treatment in comparison with antiresorptives seems to be preserved. This review provides an overview of the existing bone-forming therapies for osteoporosis including considerations of sequential and combination therapy.

Introduction: The optimal duration of osteoporosis treatment is controversial. As opposed to bisphosphonates, denosumab does not incorporate into bone matrix and bone turnover is not suppressed after its cessation. Recent reports imply that denosumab discontinuation may lead to an increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures., Methods: The European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) formed a working group to perform a systematic review of existing literature on the effects of stopping denosumab and provide advice on management., Results: Data from phase 2 and 3 clinical trials underscore a rapid decrease of bone mineral density (BMD) and a steep increase in bone turnover markers (BTMs) after discontinuation of denosumab. Clinical case series report multiple vertebral fractures after discontinuation of denosumab and a renewed analysis of FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension Trial suggests, albeit does not prove, that the risk of multiple vertebral fractures may be increased when denosumab is stopped due to a rebound increase in bone resorption., Conclusion: There appears to be an increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures after discontinuation of denosumab although strong evidence for such an effect and for measures to prevent the occurring bone loss is lacking. Clinicians and patients should be aware of this potential risk. Based on available data, a re-evaluation should be performed after 5years of denosumab treatment. Patients considered at high fracture risk should either continue denosumab therapy for up to 10years or be switched to an alternative treatment. For patients at low risk, a decision to discontinue denosumab could be made after 5years, but bisphosphonate therapy should be considered to reduce or prevent the rebound increase in bone turnover. However, since the optimal bisphosphonate regimen post-denosumab is currently unknown continuation of denosumab can also be considered until results from ongoing trials become available. Based on current data, denosumab should not be stopped without considering alternative treatment in order to prevent rapid BMD loss and a potential rebound in vertebral fracture risk., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cathepsin K (CatK), a cysteine protease, is highly expressed by osteoclasts and very efficiently degrades type I collagen, the major component of the organic bone matrix. Robust genetic and pharmacological preclinical studies consistently demonstrate that CatK inhibition increases bone mass, improves bone microarchitecture and strength. Recent advances in the understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in bone modeling and remodeling suggest that inhibition of CatK decreases bone resorption, but increases the number of cells of osteoclast lineage. This in turn maintains the signals for bone formation, and perhaps may even increase bone formation on some cortical surfaces. Several CatK inhibitors, including relacatib, balicatib, odanacatib and ONO-5334 had entered clinical development for metabolic bone disorders with increased bone resorption, such as postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, odanacatib (ODN) is the only candidate continuing in development. ODN is a highly selective oral CatK inhibitor dosed once-weekly in humans. In a Phase 2 clinical trial, postmenopausal women treated with ODN had sustained reductions of bone resorption markers, while bone formation markers returned to normal after an initial decline within the first 2 years on treatment. In turn areal bone mineral density increased continuously at both spine and hip for up to 5 years. ODN has also been demonstrated to improve bone mass in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis previously treated with alendronate and in men with osteoporosis. ODN is currently in a worldwide Phase 3 fracture outcome trial for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with interim results supporting its anti-fracture efficacy at the spine, hip and non-vertebral sites.

Objective: To better characterize patients who are currently being prescribed teriparatide in Europe, this article describes the study design and baseline characteristics of participants of the Extended Forsteo * Observational Study (ExFOS)., Research Design and Methods: ExFOS is a noninterventional, multicenter, prospective, observational study in men and women with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide during the course of normal clinical practice for up to 24 months and with a post-treatment follow-up of at least 18 months., Main Outcome Measures: Baseline characteristics, including history of fracture and back pain, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL, assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimension [EQ-5D])., Results: Of 1607 patients enrolled, 90.9% were women. At baseline, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 70.3 (9.8) years, and 85.8% of patients had a history of fracture (64.7% with ≥2 fragility fractures). Of those with historic fractures, 90.8% had vertebral fractures (67.8% had thoracic fractures). The mean (SD) of reported bone mineral density T-scores were -3.0 (1.2), -2.4 (1.0), and -2.5 (0.9) for lumbar spine, total hip (left), and femoral neck (left), respectively. Overall, 39.3% of patients had experienced ≥1 fall during the 12 months before enrollment. At baseline, 11.4% of patients were osteoporosis-treatment naïve and 15% were currently using glucocorticoids. The mean (SD) visual analog scale score for back pain during the last month was 50.7 (26.9), and 62.1% of patients experienced daily or almost daily back pain. The median EQ-5D health state value at baseline was 0.62 (first and third quartiles: 0.19, 0.74)., Conclusions: Baseline characteristics of the ExFOS study cohort indicate that patients prescribed teriparatide in Europe have severe osteoporosis with highly prevalent vertebral fractures, frequent and disabling back pain, and a poor HRQoL, despite previous pharmacotherapy for osteoporosis. Limitations include non-randomization, lack of a comparator group, and patient self-report for data on prior medication and fracture history.

Unlabelled: The characteristics and effectiveness of osteoporosis multifaceted group education were determined from a systematic review of international literature. Findings showed that these educational programmes may be beneficial in a variety of important factors for the prevention, treatment and management of osteoporosis., Introduction: This systematic review investigated quantitative studies on osteoporosis multifaceted group education. The purpose was to investigate the characteristics as well as the effectiveness of this form of osteoporosis patient education., Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guided this systematic review. Relevant databases were searched until January 2013., Results: Seven studies published between 1993 and 2011 including osteoporosis patients with or without fractures were found. The multifaceted educational programmes all consisted of three overall themes: (1) Knowledge of osteoporosis, (2) Medication and diet and (3) Exercise, but with different foci across the studies. Overall, 24 outcome measures representing six topics were applied: (1) Health-related quality of life, (2) Psychosocial function, (3) Pain, (4) Physical activity, (5) Knowledge and (6) Medication and diet. The review showed that multifaceted osteoporosis group education can increase the patients' knowledge of osteoporosis as well as their health-related quality of life, physical activity and psychosocial functioning. It has the potential to increase adherence to both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments., Conclusions: Multifaceted group education may have a positive impact on the patients' ability to engage in preventing and managing osteoporosis. Further research directed towards the complexity of multifaceted group education is needed. In addition, research investigating the educational needs of specific groups of osteoporotic patients is required.

Unlabelled: The P2X(7) receptor is an ATP-gated cation channel. We investigated the effect of both loss-of-function and gain-of-function polymorphisms in the P2X(7) receptor gene on BMD and risk of vertebral fractures and found that five polymorphisms and haplotypes containing three of these polymorphisms were associated with BMD and fracture risk., Introduction: The P2X(7) receptor is an ATP-gated cation channel. P2X(7) receptor knockout mice have reduced total bone mineral content, and because several functional polymorphisms have been identified in the human P2X(7) receptor gene, we wanted to investigate the effect of these polymorphisms on BMD and risk of vertebral fractures in a case-control study including 798 individuals., Methods: Genotyping was carried out using TaqMan assays. BMD was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and vertebral fractures were assessed by lateral spinal X-rays., Results: The rare allele of a splice site polymorphism, 151 + 1: G-T, was associated with increased fracture risk and reduced BMD in women. Two other loss-of-function polymorphisms, Glu496Ala and Gly150Arg, were also associated with BMD. The Glu496Ala variant allele was associated with decreased lumbar spine BMD in women and decreased total hip BMD in men. The 150Arg allele was associated with decreased total hip BMD in women and men combined. The minor allele of the gain-of-function polymorphism, Ala348Thr, was associated with reduced fracture risk and increased BMD at all sites in men. The Gln460Arg variant allele, which has been associated with increased receptor function in monocytes, was associated with increased total hip BMD in women. With the exception of His155Tyr for which we found conflicting results in men and women, our results are consistent with the phenotype of the knockout mouse. Analysis of a haplotype containing Ala348Thr, Gln460Arg, and Glu496Ala showed that the effects of the haplotypes on BMD and fracture were driven by Ala348Thr in men and by Gln460Arg and Glu496Ala in women., Conclusion: In conclusion, we found that functional polymorphisms in the P2X(7) receptor gene and haplotypes containing three of these polymorphisms are associated with osteoporosis.

Background: Fractures in men are a major health issue, and data on the antifracture efficacy of therapies for osteoporosis in men are limited. We studied the effect of zoledronic acid on fracture risk among men with osteoporosis., Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 1199 men with primary or hypogonadism-associated osteoporosis who were 50 to 85 years of age to receive an intravenous infusion of zoledronic acid (5 mg) or placebo at baseline and at 12 months. Participants received daily calcium and vitamin D supplementation. The primary end point was the proportion of participants with one or more new morphometric vertebral fractures over a period of 24 months., Results: The rate of any new morphometric vertebral fracture was 1.6% in the zoledronic acid group and 4.9% in the placebo group over the 24-month period, representing a 67% risk reduction with zoledronic acid (relative risk, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.70; P=0.002). As compared with men who received placebo, men who received zoledronic acid had fewer moderate-to-severe vertebral fractures (P=0.03) and less height loss (P=0.002). Fewer participants who received zoledronic acid had clinical vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, although this difference did not reach significance because of the small number of fractures. Bone mineral density was higher and bone-turnover markers were lower in the men who received zoledronic acid (P<0.05 for both comparisons). Results were similar in men with low serum levels of total testosterone. The zoledronic acid and placebo groups did not differ significantly with respect to the incidence of death (2.6% and 2.9%, respectively) or serious adverse events (25.3% and 25.2%)., Conclusions: Zoledronic acid treatment was associated with a significantly reduced risk of vertebral fracture among men with osteoporosis. (Funded by Novartis Pharma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00439647.).

Unlabelled: This paper provides a framework for the development of national guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men and women aged 18 years and over in whom oral glucocorticoid therapy is considered for 3 months or longer., Introduction: The need for updated guidelines for Europe and other parts of the world was recognised by the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Calcified Tissue Society, which set up a joint Guideline Working Group at the end of 2010., Methods and Results: The epidemiology of GIO is reviewed. Assessment of risk used a fracture probability-based approach, and intervention thresholds were based on 10-year probabilities using FRAX. The efficacy of intervention was assessed by a systematic review., Conclusions: Guidance for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is updated in the light of new treatments and methods of assessment. National guidelines derived from this resource need to be tailored within the national healthcare framework of each country.

The use of glucocorticoids in the treatment of medical disorders can lead to rapid bone loss and increased risk of fragility fracture. Updated clinical guidelines are needed that accommodate recent advances in fracture risk assessment and new pharmacological interventions to reduce fracture risk. This document serves as an appendix to the 2012 IOF-ECTS guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Unlabelled: Stimulation of PPARγ turns mesenchymal stem cells into adipocytes instead of osteoblasts. We investigated the effect of polymorphisms in the PPARγ gene on BMD and fracture risk in two Danish cohorts and found opposing effects of certain SNPs and haplotypes in the two cohorts probably owing to environmental factors., Introduction: Stimulation of PPARγ causes development of mesenchymal stem cells to adipocytes instead of osteoblasts leading to decreased osteoblast number and BMD. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of PPARG polymorphisms on BMD and fracture risk in two Danish cohorts: AROS, a case-control population comprising 809 individuals and DOPS, a population comprising 1,716 perimenopausal women allocated to hormone therapy or not at baseline and followed for 10 years. On the basis of linkage disequilibrium between SNPs throughout the gene and previous studies we chose 10 polymorphisms for investigation., Methods: In AROS, individuals heterozygous for the polymorphisms rs12497191, rs4135263, and rs1151999 had an increased risk of vertebral fractures (OR = 1.48-1.76, p = 0.005-0.04) compared with individuals homozygous for the common allele. In DOPS, individuals heterozygous for rs1151999 had an increased BMD at the hip sites (p ≤ 0.02). An interaction between rs1151999 and diet was found on BMD in both cohorts., Results: For the polymorphism rs1152003 there was an interaction with body weight on BMD at all sites in both cohorts (p ≤ 0.07). Stratified analyses revealed that in the high weight group in AROS individuals homozygous for the variant allele had a decreased BMD (p ≤ 0.02), whereas the same pattern was found in the low weight group in DOPS (p ≤ 0.03). A number of haplotype associations were found as well, the direction of which was opposite in the two cohorts., Conclusion: Our study suggests an association SNPs in PPARG and haplotypes thereof and BMD and fracture risk. The effect however appears to be modifiable by environmental factors.

Unlabelled: ALOX12 produces ligands for PPARγ thereby turning mesenchymal stem cells into adipocytes instead of osteoblasts. We investigated the effect of polymorphisms in the ALOX12 gene on BMD and fracture risk in two Danish cohorts and found four polymorphisms and a haplotype thereof to be associated with BMD and fracture risk., Introduction: Stimulation of the PPARγ with ligands produced by the ALOX enzymes drives mesenchymal stem cells in an adipocyte direction at the expense of osteoblasts leading to decreased osteoblast number and BMD. Previously, polymorphisms in the ALOX12 gene have been associated with osteoporosis., Methods: We examined the effect of ALOX12 polymorphisms on BMD and the risk of fractures in two Danish cohorts: AROS, a case-control population comprising 809 individuals and DOPS, a population comprising 1,716 perimenopausal women allocated to hormone therapy or not at baseline and followed for up to 10 years. On the basis of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNPs throughout the gene and previous genetic association studies we chose ten polymorphisms for investigation. Genotyping was carried out using the Sequenom MassARRAY genotyping system and TaqMan assays., Results: In AROS, individuals heterozygous for the polymorphisms rs3840880, rs9897850, rs2292350 and rs1126667 had a 3.0-4.7% decreased lumbar spine BMD (p = 0.02-0.06) and an increased risk of vertebral fractures (p < 0.05) compared with individuals homozygous for either allele. In DOPS, none of the individual SNPs were associated with BMD or incident fractures. In both cohorts, the above-mentioned SNPs comprised an LD-block (pairwise D´ = 1.0, r (2) = 0.45-0.97). A haplotype comprising all the common alleles (frequency 9%) was associated with decreased bone loss at the hip (p < 0.05) and decreased incidence of osteoporotic fractures (p < 0.05) in DOPS and increased femoral neck BMD in AROS (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: Our study suggests that genetic variants in ALOX12 may influence BMD and fracture risk.

Osteoporosis is a common age-related disease with a strong genetic influence. Polymorphisms of ESR1 have consistently been shown to be associated with bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture; however, in regulating bone metabolism, ESR1 interacts with both ESR2 and RIZ1. We therefore examined the effects of polymorphisms in the ESR1, ESR2, and RIZ1 genes and their haplotypes on vertebral fractures and BMD in a case-control study comprising 462 osteoporotic patients and 336 controls. In ESR1, we found the variant C allele of the XbaI polymorphism to be associated with decreased risk of vertebral fractures in women (P < 0.01), whereas in men, the T allele seemed protective (P = 0.05). The variant G allele of the PvuII polymorphism decreased the risk of vertebral fractures independently of lumbar spine BMD in women (P = 0.04) but had no effect in men. Haplotype X-P-H (XbaI:C, PvuII:G, and a high number of TA repeats) was associated with decreased risk of vertebral fractures in women (P = 0.04) but not men. In ESR2, the G allele of the AluI polymorphism was associated with increased fracture risk (P = 0.04), and the haplotype that comprises rs1256031:T and AluI:A increased lumbar spine BMD by 0.04 +/- 0.02 g/cm(2) (P < 0.05) and decreased the risk of vertebral fractures (P = 0.04). There was no effect of the RIZ1 polymorphism on BMD or fracture risk and no evidence of interaction between the polymorphisms and haplotypes thereof. We confirm that genetic variants in ESR1 and ESR2, but not RIZ1, are important in osteoporosis. We found no evidence of interaction between polymorphisms, but we found that the effects of genetic variants in ESR1 might be sex dependent.

Summary: The effects of teriparatide versus alendronate were compared by gender and menopausal status in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. At 18 months, increases in lumbar spine BMD were significantly greater in the teriparatide versus alendronate group in postmenopausal women (7.8% versus 3.7%, p < 0.001), premenopausal women (7.0% versus 0.7%, p < 0.001), and men (7.3% versus 3.7%, p = 0.03)., Introduction: In patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO), teriparatide significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) and decreased vertebral fractures compared with alendronate. We examined effects of teriparatide versus alendronate by gender and menopausal status., Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of teriparatide 20 microg/day versus alendronate 10 mg/day in patients with GIO (277 postmenopausal women, 67 premenopausal women, 83 men). Primary outcome was change in lumbar spine BMD. Secondary outcomes included change in hip BMD, change in bone biomarkers, fracture incidence, and safety., Results: At 18 months, mean percent increases from baseline in lumbar spine BMD were significantly greater in the teriparatide versus alendronate group in postmenopausal women (7.8% versus 3.7%, p < 0.001), premenopausal women (7.0% versus 0.7%, p < 0.001), and men (7.3% versus 3.7%, p = 0.03). Radiographic vertebral fractures occurred in one teriparatide (one postmenopausal) and ten alendronate patients (six postmenopausal, four men), and nonvertebral fractures occurred in 12 teriparatide (nine postmenopausal, two premenopausal, one man) and eight alendronate patients (six postmenopausal, two men). The proportion of patients reporting adverse events in teriparatide versus alendronate groups was consistent across subgroups., Conclusion: Among men and pre- and postmenopausal women with GIO, lumbar spine BMD increased more in patients receiving teriparatide compared with alendronate.

Osteoporosis is a common age-related disease with a strong genetic influence. COLIA1 is one of the most extensively studied candidate genes and has consistently been associated with BMD and fracture. We examined the effects of the polymorphisms -1997G>T, -1663indelT, and +1245G>T and their haplotypes on vertebral fractures and bone mineral density (BMD) in a case-control study comprising 462 osteoporotic patients and 336 controls. The -1663indelT polymorphism was associated with a decreased lumbar spine (ls) BMD, 0.75 +/- 0.14 g/cm(2), in individuals with the del/del genotype versus 0.83 +/- 0.18 and 0.85 +/- 0.18 g/cm(2) in individuals with the ins/del and ins/ins genotypes, respectively (p = 0.02). The T-allele of the +1245G>T polymorphism, which was in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with -1663indelT, was also associated with a decreased lsBMD (p = 0.02). -1997G>T was not significantly associated with lsBMD. The three most common haplotypes accounted for 98.5% of the alleles. Individuals with one or two copies of haplotype 1 (-1997G/-1663ins/+1245G) had a significantly higher lsBMD, 0.84 +/- 0.18 and 0.85 +/- 0.15 g/cm(2), respectively, versus 0.78 +/- 0.15 g/cm(2) in noncarriers (p = 0.01). Individuals with two copies of haplotype 2 (-1997G/-1663del/+1245T) had a significantly lower lsBMD, 0.76 +/- 0.14 g/cm(2), versus 0.85 +/- 0.18 and 0.82 +/- 0.18 g/cm(2), respectively, in individuals with zero or one copy (p = 0.03). The odds ratio for vertebral fracture in individuals carrying the variant T-allele of the -1997G>T polymorphism was 1.49 (CI, 1.03-2.16; p = 0.03). Logistic regression revealed that this effect was partly independent of BMD. In conclusion, the -1663del and +1245T alleles influence BMD negatively, whereas the -1997T-allele has a minor effect on BMD but increases the risk of vertebral fractures. These findings are in agreement with functional studies showing that these polymorphisms influence gene expression.

Osteoporosis is a common disease with a strong genetic component characterized by reduced bone mass and an increased risk of fragility fractures. Bone mineral density (BMD) is the most important determinant of osteoporotic fracture risk, but the genes responsible for BMD regulation and fracture are incompletely defined. To enable multi-center studies to examine the genetic influences on BMD there is a requirement to standardize measurements across different manufacturers of bone densitometers, different versions of machines and different normative ranges. This paper describes a method developed to allow near-identical subjects with low age-adjusted BMD (based on Z-scores) to be recruited in 17 centers using 27 different densitometers. Cross-calibration was based on measurements using a European spine phantom circulated to all centers and measured ten times on each individual machine. From theses values an individual exponential curve, based on nominal versus observed BMD, was derived for each machine. As expected, there were large and significant variations in nominal BMD values, not only between scanners from different manufacturers but also between different versions of scanners from the same manufacturer. Hologic scanners tended to underestimate the nominal BMD, while Lunar scanners overestimated the value. Norland scanners gave mixed values over estimating BMD at the lower nominal value (0.5 g/cm2) while underestimating the value at the higher value (1.5 g/cm2). The validity of the exponential equations was tested using hip and spine measurements on 991 non-proband women from a familial osteoporosis study (FAMOS). After cross-calibration there was a considerable reduction in variation between machines. This observation, coupled with the absence of a similar reduction in variation attributable to a linear regression on age, demonstrated the validity of the cross-calibration approach. Use of the cross-calibration curves along with a standard normative range (in the case of this study, the Hologic normative range) allowed age-specific Z-scores to be used as an inclusion criterion in this genetic study, a method that will be useful for other trials where age-specific BMD inclusion criteria are required.

Osteoporosis is a common disease with a strong genetic component, characterized by reduced bone mass and an increased risk of fracture. Bone mineral density (BMD) is a highly heritable trait and a key determinant of osteoporotic fracture risk, but the genes responsible are incompletely defined. Here, we identified quantitative trait loci (QTL) for regulation of BMD by a genome wide scan involving 3691 individuals from 715 families, who were selected because of reduced BMD values at the lumbar spine (LS-BMD) or femoral neck (FN-BMD) in probands. Linkage analysis was conducted in the study group as a whole with correction for age, gender, weight and height. Further analyses were conducted for men and women separately to identify gender-specific QTL and for those under and over the age of 50 years to distinguish QTL for peak bone mass from those that influence bone mass in older people. No regions of suggestive or significant linkage were identified when data from all subjects were analyzed together. On subgroup analysis, however, we identified a significant QTL for FN-BMD on chromosome 10q21 (LOD score +4.42; men < or =50 years) and two suggestive QTL for LS-BMD on chromosomes 18p11 (LOD score +2.83; women >50 years) and 20q13 (LOD score +3.20; women < or =50 years). We identified five other QTL for BMD with LOD scores of greater than +2.20 on chromosomes 3q25, 4q25, 7p14, 16p13 and 16q23. This study provides evidence for gender-specific, site-specific and age-specific QTL, which regulate BMD in humans, and illustrates the importance of conducting subgroup analysis to detect these loci.

Context: Both bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk have a strong genetic component. Estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) is a candidate gene for osteoporosis, but previous studies of ESR1 polymorphisms in this field were hampered by small sample size, lack of standardization, and inconclusive results., Objective: To generate large-scale evidence on whether 3 common ESR1 polymorphisms (intron 1 polymorphisms XbaI [dbSNP: rs9340799] and PvuII [dbSNP: rs2234693] and promoter TA repeats microsatellite) and haplotypes thereof are associated with BMD and fractures., Design and Setting: Meta-analysis of individual-level data involving standardized genotyping of 18 917 individuals in 8 European centers., Main Outcome Measures: BMD of femoral neck and lumbar spine; all fractures and vertebral fractures by genotype., Results: No between-center heterogeneity was observed for any outcome in any genetic contrast. None of the 3 polymorphisms or haplotypes had any statistically significant effect on BMD in adjusted or unadjusted analyses, and estimated differences between genetic contrasts were 0.01 g/cm2 or less. Conversely, we found significant reductions in fracture risk. In women homozygous for the absence of an XbaI recognition site, the adjusted odds of all fractures were reduced by 19% (odds ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.71-0.93]; P = .002) and vertebral fractures by 35% (odds ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.49-0.87]; P = .003). Effects on fractures were independent of BMD and unaltered in adjusted analyses. No significant effects on fracture risk were seen for PvuII and TA repeats., Conclusions: ESR1 is a susceptibility gene for fractures, and XbaI determines fracture risk by mechanisms independent of BMD. Our study demonstrates the value of adequately powered studies with standardized genotyping and clinical outcomes in defining effects of common genetic variants on complex diseases.

Osteoporosis is a common disease with a strong genetic component. Hypogonadism results in low bone mass and it increases significantly the risk of osteoporosis in both sexes. The estrogen and androgen receptor genes are therefore strong candidates for mediating the genetic influence on bone mass and risk of osteoporosis. A CAG repeat in the first exon of the androgen receptor (AR) is associated with reduced transcriptional activity of the AR. We therefore examined whether this CAG repeat polymorphism is associated with changes in bone mass and risk of osteoporotic fractures in 284 osteoporotic patients with vertebral fractures and 327 normal individuals. The number of CAG repeats varied between 13 and 30 in men and between 7 and 34 in women. The short and long alleles comprised 19.2 +/- 2.5 and 19.0 +/- 2.3 repeats (ns) and 22.7 +/- 2.4 and 21.9 +/- 2.4 (P < 0.01) in women with vertebral fractures and normal women, respectively. This difference was also reflected in the average number of CAG repeats: 21.0 +/- 2.0 in osteoporotic women vs. 20.5 +/- 2.0 in normal women (P < 0.05). 54.8% of women with osteoporotic fractures vs. 45.9% of normal women had average number of CAG repeats of 21 and more (chi2 = 3.11, P = 0.08). Logistic regression analyses revealed that both the average number of CAG repeats and the length of the long allele were significant predictors of osteoporotic fractures in women (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Men with vertebral fractures had 20.0 +/- 2.8 CAG repeats compared with 20.7 +/- 2.5 CAG repeats in normal men (ns). Linear regression analysis revealed that the length of the long allele was negatively correlated with BMD of the lumbar spine (P < 0.05) and femoral neck (P < 0.05) in women. In men, linear regression analyses demonstrated that BMD of the lumbar spine (P < 0.05), femoral neck (P < 0.05) and total hip (P < 0.05) was positively correlated with length of the CAG repeat polymorphism. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the CAG repeat polymorphism in the first exon of the AR gene is associated with reduced bone mass and increased risk of osteoporotic fractures in women.

Estrogen and the estrogen receptor (ER) play a central role in bone metabolism as illustrated by the loss of bone mass after menopause and the osteopenia in individuals with defect aromatase or ER. We therefore wanted to investigate the effect of polymorphisms in the ER-alpha gene on bone mass, bone turnover, and the prevalence of osteoporotic fractures in a study of 160 women and 30 men with vertebral fractures and 124 women and 64 men who are normal. Three previously described polymorphisms, G261-C in exon 1 and T-C and A-G in intron 1, in the ER gene were determined by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) using BstUI, Pvu II, and Xba I after polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A TA repeat polymorphism in the promoter region was examined by PCR and electrophoresis. The distribution of BstUI, Pvu II, and Xba I RFLPs was similar in the osteoporotic patients and the normal controls. No significant differences could be shown in bone mass or bone turnover between the genotypes. The mean number of TA repeats was lower in patients with osteoporotic fractures, 17.3+/-2.8 versus 18.6+/-2.8 in the normal controls (p < 0.01). This also was reflected in a significantly increased odds ratio of osteoporotic fractures in individuals with 11-18 repeats of 2.64 (95% CIs, 1.61-4.34). Furthermore, bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was lower in individuals with low mean number of repeats than in individuals with high mean number of repeats (0.790+/-0.184 g/cm2 vs. 0.843+/-0.191 g/cm2; p < 0.05). This difference also was found in BMD of the total hip. Using multiple linear regression, mean number of TA repeats was a predictor of lumbar spine BMD (p < 0.05) and a BMD-independent predictor of fractures (p < 0.05). Mean number of TA repeats was not associated with levels of biochemical markers of bone turnover. All four polymorphisms were in linkage disequilibrium. A TA repeat polymorphism in the ER gene is associated with increased risk of osteoporotic fractures and a modest reduction in bone mass. Polymorphisms in the first exon and first intron of the ER gene are not associated with osteoporotic fractures, bone mass, or bone turnover.

Background: Vitamin D is essential for normal bone metabolism. Polymorphisms in exon 2, intron 8 and exon 9 of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene have previously been found to be associated with bone mass and bone turnover., Materials and Methods: We examined the effect of these polymorphisms, separately and in combination, on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover, and the prevalence of osteoporotic fractures in 192 osteoporotic patients and 207 normal controls. The four polymorphisms were determined by RFLP using Fok I (T2-C), Bsm I (intron 8), Apa I (intron 8) and Taq I (T1055-C) after PCR., Results: We did not find any association between the Fok I polymorphism and bone mass, bone turnover or prevalence of osteoporotic fractures. We found that BB + Bb-genotypes were more frequent in patients with osteoporotic fractures (chi2 = 3.50, P = 0. 06). Furthermore, BMD of the intertrochanteric region (P < 0.0001, ANOVA) as well as the total hip (P < 0.01, ANOVA) were higher in individuals with the bb-genotype. The Apa I and the Taq I polymorphisms were not distributed differently among osteoporotic patients and normal controls. Apa I was not associated with differences in BMD. BMD of the intertrochanteric region was higher in individuals with the TT-genotype compared with individuals with the Tt- or tt-genotypes (P < 0.01, ANOVA), while no differences could be demonstrated in BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, trochanter or Wards triangle. Combining the genotypes generally reflected the differences caused by the Bsm I polymorphism., Conclusion: We have found that the B-allele of the Bsm I polymorphism in the 3' untranslated region of the VDR was associated with low BMD at the hip, and tended to be associated with osteoporotic fractures. The translation initiation polymorphism in the VDR does not affect BMD and is not associated with osteoporotic fractures in men or women.

Interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) is a potent stimulator of bone resorption, and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of high bone turnover and osteoporosis. IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) is a competitive inhibitor of IL-1beta effects and the biological effects of IL-1beta are therefore proportional to the ratio IL-1beta/IL-1ra. The coding regions of IL-1beta were examined for sequence variations by SSCP and sequencing after polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of genomic DNA. Three previously described polymorphisms (C(-511)-T, G(3877)-A and C(3954)-T) in the IL-1beta gene were determined by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) using Ava I, Aci I, and Taq I after PCR. The 86-base pair repeat polymorphism in IL-1ra was examined by PCR and electrophoresis and the T11100-C polymorphism in the IL-1ra gene was examined by RFLP using MspA1I after PCR. All polymorphisms were related to bone mass, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and presence of fracture in a study including 389 osteoporotic patients with vertebral fractures and normal controls. Two normal women were heterozygous for a shift from cytosine to thymine (C3263-T) in exon 4 of the IL-1beta gene. This substitution did not affect the amino acid sequence. We did not find other sequence variations in the IL-1beta gene apart from the already known polymorphisms. The distribution of C(-511)-T, G(3877)-A, and C(3954)-T genotypes was similar in the osteoporotic and the normal controls. No significant differences could be shown in bone mass or bone turnover. In the IL-1ra gene almost complete linkage was confirmed between the already known polymorphisms: G(1731)-A, G(1821)-A, A(1868)-G, G(1887)-C, T(8006)-C, C(8061)-T, 86 base pair variable number tandem repeat (VNTR), A(9589)-T, and a new polymorphism: T(1934)-C. The A1A1/A3 genotypes of the IL-1ra VNTR polymorphism were significantly more frequent in osteoporotic patients (56.2%) compared with age-matched normal controls (43.3%) (chi2 = 4.09; p = 0.043). The relative risk of osteoporotic fractures was increased to 1.68 (95% CI, 1.01-2.77) in individuals with A1A1/A3 genotypes. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was reduced in individuals with A1A1/A3 genotypes (p = 0.014, analysis of variance [ANOVA]). The difference in bone mass between A1A1/A3 and A2A1/A2 tended to increase with increasing age. T1100-C genotypes were distributed similarly in osteoporotic patients and normal controls and the polymorphism was without effect on bone mass and biochemical markers of bone turnover. In conclusion, an 86-base pair repeat polymorphism in the IL-lra gene is associated with increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Other polymorphisms in the IL-1ra and the IL-1beta genes are not associated with osteoporotic fractures or alterations in bone mass or bone turnover.

We have compared the telomere length, as assessed by Southern analysis, of telomere restriction fragments (TRFs) generated by RsaI/HinfI digestion of genomic DNA in: (i) in vitro cultured human trabecular osteoblasts undergoing cellular aging; and (ii) peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) obtained from three groups of women: young (aged 20-26 years, n = 15), elderly (aged 48-85 years, n = 15) and osteoporotic (aged 52-81 years, n = 14). The mean TRF length in human osteoblasts undergoing aging in vitro decreased from an average of 9.32 kilobasepairs (kb) in middle-aged cells to an average of 7.80 kb in old cells. The rate of TRF shortening was about 100 bp per population doubling, which is similar to what has been reported for other cell types, such as human fibroblasts. Furthermore, there was a 30% decline in the total amount of telomeric DNA in senescent osteoblasts as compared with young cells. In the case of PBL, TRF length in the DNA extracted from young women was slightly longer (6.76 +/- 0.64 kb) than that from a group of elderly women (6.42 +/- 0.71 kb). A comparison of TRFs in the DNA extracted from the PBL from osteoporotic patients and from age-matched controls did not show any significant differences (6.47 +/- 0.94 versus 6.42 +/- 0.71 kb, respectively). Therefore, using TRF length as a marker for cellular aging in vitro and in vivo, our data comparing TRFs from osteoporotic patients and age-matched controls do not support the notion of the occurrence of a generalized premature cellular aging in osteoporotic patients.

Genetic factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, and recent studies have shown that a polymorphic Sp1 binding site in collagen type I alpha1 (COLIA1) gene is associated with bone mass and vertebral fractures in women from the U.K. Information on the predictive value of the COLIA1 Sp1 polymorphism in other populations is limited, however, and no studies have yet been performed in osteoporotic males. In view of this, we analyzed COLIA1 genotypes in relation to bone density and biochemical markers of bone turnover and the presence of osteoporotic fractures in a case-control study of Danish men and women. COLIA1 genotype was determined by polymerase chain reaction analysis of genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood samples and related to bone mass, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and the presence of fracture in a study of 375 osteoporotic vertebral fracture patients and normal controls. There was no significant effect of COLIA1 genotype on bone mass or biochemical markers when data from the control group (n = 195) and fracture group (n = 180) were analyzed separately. However, the genotype distribution was significantly different in the fracture cases compared with age-matched controls (chi2 = 16.48, n = 249,p = 0.0003) due mainly to over-representation of the ss genotype in the fracture patients (14.3% vs. 1.4%), equivalent to an odds ratio for vertebral fracture of 11.83 (95% confidence interval 2.64-52.97) in those with the ss genotype. Similar differences in genotype distribution between osteoporotic patients and controls were observed in both men (chi2 = 11.52, n = 95, p = 0.0032, OR = 2.04) and women (chi2 = 6.90, n = 154, p = 0.032, OR = 1.37). In keeping with the above, logistic regression analysis showed that the ss genotype was an independent predictor of osteoporotic fracture (p = 0.028). This study confirms that the COLIA1 Sp1 polymorphism is significantly associated with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The association is seen in both men and women, and the effect on fracture risk appears to be partly independent of bone mineral density. Our results raise the possibility that genotyping at the Sp1 site could be of clinical value in identifying individuals at risk of osteoporotic fractures in both genders.

Idiopathic osteoporosis in younger individuals could be related to reduced bone formation rather than increased bone resorption, and disturbances in GH or insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I production could be involved in its pathogenesis. In the present study, men with idiopathic osteoporosis were compared with healthy men, with respect to bone histomorphometry and to serum levels of IGF-I, IGF-II, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-2 and IGFBP-3, and 24-h urinary excretion of GH. Mean wall thickness was reduced in the patients (48.3 +/- 7.2 vs. 61.7 +/- 5.4 microns, P < 0.001). Also, resorption depth was decreased, albeit to a lesser degree (54.4 +/- 3.8 vs. 60.7 +/- 5.3 microns, P < 0.01), thus creating a pronounced negative balance (-6.04 +/- 9.8 vs. 0.96 +/- 3.2 microns, P < 0.05). In the patients, serum concentrations of IGFBP-3 were reduced, compared with controls, with a 46% lower mean value; whereas levels of IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-2, and GH were similar in the two groups. Thus, there was a significant negative balance caused by a pronounced decrease in wall thickness in men with idiopathic osteoporosis. The finding of low IGFBP-3 levels in these patients is interesting, in view of previous clinical and experimental findings, but its pathophysiological significance remains to be determined.

Bone mass is partly genetically determined. The genes involved are, however, still largely unknown. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) is considered a putative regulator of osteoclastic-osteoblastic interaction (coupling). The aim of the present study was therefore to examine whether possible variants of the TGF-beta 1 gene are related to bone mass and osteoporosis. We examined 161 osteoporotic women (at least one low energy spinal fracture) and 131 normal women. We investigated sequence variations in the TGF-beta 1 gene using the single-stranded conformation polymorphism (SSCP) technique combined with DNA sequencing. Seven patients were heterozygous for a cytosine to thymidine base substitution at position 76 in exon 5 (C788-T) (corresponding to position 788 in the TGF-beta 1 cDNA), resulting in a threonine to isoleucine amino acid shift at position 263 in the TGF-beta 1 propeptide (Thr263-Ile). Ten other patients had a one base deletion in the intron sequence 8 bases prior to exon 5 (713-8delC), which could influence splicing. Five normal women exhibited the C788-T sequence variant, and two the 713-8delC. The prevalence of 713-8delC was significantly higher in the osteoporotic group (chi 2 = 4.02, p < 0.05). Osteoporotic patients with the 713-8delC variant had increased levels of bone alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.05). If the osteoporotic patients with a z score of the lumbar spine below -1 were examined separately, we found increased serum levels of bone alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.05), increased urinary excretion of hydroxyproline (p < 0.05), and reduced bone mass of the lumbar spine (p < 0.05) in patients with 713-8delC. No correlation to bone mass was demonstrated in the normal women, but 713-8delC was associated with increased serum levels of bone alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.05). The sequence variation, 713-8delC, in the TGF-beta 1 gene is more frequent in patients with osteoporosis compared to normal controls. The 713-8delC variant seems to be associated with very low bone mass in osteoporotic women with low bone mass and increased bone turnover in both osteoporotic and normal women.

Consensus and WHO definitions of osteoporosis are provided. The pathogenesis of the disorder has genetic, hormonal and environmental influences which affect peak bone mass, perimenopausal bone loss and age-dependent bone loss. Peak bone mass is mainly genetically determined, though dietary factors and physical activity can have positive effects. Peak bone mass is attained at the point when skeletal growth ceases, after which time bone loss starts. Loss of oestrogen with the menopause results in accelerated bone loss. Bone remodelling balance tips in favour of osteoclastic bone resorption, with osteoblastic bone formation not able to match the level of resorption. Hormone replacement therapy can reverse this trend. Proposed mechanisms and the parts played by the different cell populations and factors are discussed. Osteoblasts are particularly sensitive to ageing phenomena--more sensitive than are osteoclasts, so the negative bone balance increases with increasing age. Age-dependent bone loss is aggravated by reduced calcium absorption, a mutation in the collagen gene and polymorphism in TGF-beta and oestrogen receptor proteins.