Search

Is osteoporosis related to worst outcomes after fall accidents? After a fall accident, there were no differences in walking and balance between individuals with/without osteoporosis. Gains in fat tissue, higher pain, and difficulty to walk were related to previous falls, regardless of osteoporosis., Purpose: Impairments are expected after an accidental fall in the older age; whoever, it is still unclear if patients suffering from osteoporosis are in higher risks of fall accidents and if such accidents would cause worst outcomes compared with older adults without osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to discriminate fallers and non-fallers via a combination of physical performance measurements of older adults (65 + years) with and without osteoporosis., Methods: Older adults (n = 116) were screened for a previous fall accident and tested during (i) quiet stance; (ii) single- and dual-task walking; (iii) 8-Foot Up-and-Go; (iv) Mini BESTest; (v) 2-min step-in-place and (vi) 30-s chair stand. Evaluation of average daily pain intensity and total body fat% were obtained., Results: Forty-four subjects (38%) reported a previous fall accident. There was, however, no association between osteoporosis and previous fall. Fallers had a higher daily pain intensity, higher body fat%, slower walking speed during a cognitive dual-task test and worse performance at the 8-Foot Up-and-Go test and the Mini BESTest compared to non-fallers., Conclusions: Although the presence of osteoporosis might not increase the risk of fall accidents, healthcare professionals should expect that accidental falls in older adults are associated with higher body fat%, higher daily pain intensity and problems performing daily activities such as walking., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

People with T1D and T2D have an increased risk of fractures than the general population, posing several significant pathophysiologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic challenges. The pathophysiology is still not fully elucidated, but it is considered a combination of increased skeletal fragility and falls. Diagnostics issues exist, as regular and even newer scan methods underestimate the true incidence of osteoporosis and thus the fracture risk. Therefore, co-managing diabetes and osteoporosis by using top-line strategies is essential to preserve bone health and minimize the risk of falls. The therapeutic focus should start with lifestyle implementation and physical exercise interventions to reduce diabetic complications, strengthen bones, and improve postural control strategies. In addition, osteoporosis should be treated according to current guidelines by including bisphosphonates and antidiabetic drugs that support bone health. Finally, potentially modifiable risk factors for falls should be managed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Peter Vestergaard is the head of research in the Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark sponsored by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. Nicklas H. Rasmussen holds shares in Novo Nordisk and holds lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Lymphoma patients often receive high glucocorticoid doses as part of standard therapy. Observational studies have shown a substantial risk of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) with associated fractures. The aim of the SIESTA trial was to determine if oral alendronate (ALN) is a safe and effective prophylaxis against GIO in lymphoma. SIESTA was a single-center, randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 study of lymphoma patients planned for glucocorticoid-containing chemotherapy. After randomization, patients received weekly ALN 70 mg or placebo for a total of 52 weeks. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed at baseline, after completion of chemotherapy (end of treatment [EOT]) (4 to 6 months), and at the end of the study (EOS) (12 months). Vertebral fracture and biomarkers were assessed at baseline and EOS. Patients with baseline BMD assessment and at least 1 follow-up BMD assessment were analyzed for efficacy. The primary endpoint was a change in lumbar spine T-score from baseline to EOS. Of the 59 patients enrolled, 23 of 30 in the ALN arm and 24 of 29 in the placebo arm were analyzed for efficacy. The mean change in T-score from baseline to 12 months at the lumbar spine was +0.15 for ALN and -0.12 for placebo (P = .023). The difference in ΔTEOS between the ALN and placebo groups was larger among females (ALN 0.28; placebo -0.28; P = .01). Biomarker analyses confirmed reduced bone resorption in ALN-treated patients. In conclusion, ALN is a safe and effective primary prophylaxis against loss in BMD following glucocorticoid-containing chemotherapy. Despite reduced BMD loss in the ALN arm, the treatment did not influence fracture risk in this small cohort of patients., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Objective: A link has been proposed between glucose homeostasis and bone metabolism. Bisphosphonates are first-line treatment of osteoporosis, and we aimed to investigate whether the risk of developing type 2 diabetes was associated with prior use of alendronate., Research Design and Methods: We conducted a population-based nested case-control study through access to all discharge diagnoses (ICD-10 system) from the National Danish Patient Registry along with all redeemed drug prescriptions (ATC classification system) from the Health Service Prescription Registry. All cases with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes between 2008 and 2018 were matched on sex and age with 3 randomly selected controls by incidence-density sampling. Exposure was defined as ever use of alendronate and further grouped as effective and compliant use. ORs were calculated by conditional logistic regression analysis with adjustment for several confounders and test for trend for dose-response relationship., Results: We included 163,588 patients with type 2 diabetes and 490,764 matched control subjects with a mean age of 67 years and 55% male subjects. The odds of developing type 2 diabetes were lower among ever users of alendronate (multiple adjusted OR: 0.64 [95% CI 0.62-0.66]). A test for trend suggested a dose-response relationship between longer effective use of alendronate and lower risk of type 2 diabetes., Conclusion: These results suggest a possible protective effect of alendronate in a dose-dependent manner against development of type 2 diabetes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Viggers, Al-Mashhadi, Starup-Linde and Vestergaard.)

High-dose prednisolone is used in first-line treatment for lymphoma, but the potential adverse impact on bone health is unclear. Danish patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or follicular lymphoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 were matched to the background population. Osteoporotic events (osteoporosis treatment or low-energy fracture) were identified using the Danish National Patient Registry and Prescription Registry. In total, 2589 patients and 12,945 controls were included. Lymphoma patients had increased risk of osteoporotic events compared to the matched population (hazard ratio 1.61 [95% confidence interval 1.40;1.84]). The 5- and 10-year cumulative risks of osteoporotic events for lymphoma patients were 10.0% [8.6;11.4] and 16.3% [13.8;18.7], whereas corresponding risks in the background population were 6.8% [6.3;7.3] and 13.5% [12.4;14.6]. Patients without osteoporotic event in the first two years after treatment were not at higher risk of osteoporotic events in subsequent years. Risk factors for osteoporotic events were female sex and age >70 years.

Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of fractures. In this study, subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures were increased in patients with type 1 diabetes compared with the general population. In the light of this, more evidence points towards an association between diabetes and atypical femoral fractures., Introduction: Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of femoral fractures, but little is known about the risk of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). The aim of this study was to identify the risk of subtrochanteric and femoral shaft (ST/FS) fractures and estimate the risk of AFFs in patients with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D)., Methods: From the nationwide Danish National Patient Register, we identified patients with T1D (n = 19,896), T2D (n = 312,188), and sex- and aged-matched controls without diabetes (n = 996,252) from the general population and all ST/FS fractures (n = 7509). Data were analyzed using a Cox proportional-hazards model and the incidence rate and rate ratio of ST/FS fractures were estimated., Results: The incidence rate of ST/FS fractures in T1D was 52.14 events per 100,000 person years and 73.21 per 100,000 person years in T2D. T1D was associated with an increased risk of ST/FS (HR 2.07 (95% CI 1.68-2.56)), whereas T2D was not (HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.94-1.10)). Previous ST/FS fractures were associated with an increased risk of subsequent ST/FS fractures (HR 6.95 (95% CI 6.00-8.05)) and the use of bisphosphonates with an increased risk of ST/FS fractures (HR 1.72 (95% CI 1.54-1.91))., Conclusion: Patients with T1D have a higher risk of ST/FS fractures compared with sex- and age-matched controls. Since a proportion of ST/FS fractures are classified as AFFs, this could point towards the fact that AFFs also are increased in patients with T1D, but not T2D.

Physiologic changes during pregnancy include calcium, phosphate, and calciotropic hormone status. Calcium metabolic disorders are rare in pregnancy and management with close calcium and vitamin D control and supplementation. Primary hyperparathyroidism is mostly asymptomatic and does not affect conception or pregnancy. It requires control of plasma calcium levels. Surgical intervention may be indicated. Data on severe cases are missing. Osteoporosis in or before pregnancy is rare but usually diagnosed from fractures. Medical treatment other than supplementation is contraindicated. Vitamin D deficiency is common and may affect conception and increase complications. Current evidence does not prove vitamin D supplements effective in improving outcomes., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Declining use of bisphosphonates (BP) in the United States and Europe may lead to a widening of the treatment gap for osteoporosis and an increase in fracture rates. However, a shift to non-bisphosphonates and to hospital administered i.v. BPs could lead to overestimation of the treatment gap if analyses are based exclusively on BP prescriptions. When a healthcare system successfully narrows the treatment gap by making appropriate use of anti-osteoporosis drugs, we would expect to see declining rates of osteoporotic fractures with much of the decrease being statistically attributable to medication uptake. We analysed a best-case scenario where all use of BPs, denosumab, raloxifene and PTH analogues - including the oncology area - was contrasted with the trend in hip fracture rates. This scenario also considered users of raloxifene and teriparatide as covered by osteoporosis drugs though the primary RCT for raloxifene showed no risk reduction in nonvertebral fractures and the RCT for teriparatide risk reductions for non-vertebral fractures but not hip fracture specifically. Sensitivity analyses were also done., Methods: We used aggregate statistics on hip fracture events and total use of the above medications estimating the number of persons potentially covered. The reduction in hip fracture rates attributable to treatment was estimated using the absolute risk reduction (ARR) found in real-world users of oral alendronate in Denmark with the ARR in the FIT primary prevention arm as an alternative scenario., Results: A plateau in use of osteoporosis medications occurred in 2014. Between 2005 and 2015, hip fracture rates declined by 30%. However, only up to 20% of the observed reduction in hip fracture rates was statistically attributable to treatment even in a best-case scenario. Sensitivity analyses where raloxifene and teriparatide were excluded did not impact on this finding., Discussion: Anti-osteoporosis treatment in Denmark reached a plateau in 2014 even in a best-case scenario where all dispensations were assumed to be for osteoporosis. Future studies may be able to distinguish between the oncology area and the osteoporosis indication as well as provide a delineation of age and gender demographics among users of hospital administered osteoporosis medications. About 80% of the decline in hip fracture rates appears to be due to factors other than osteoporosis medication. The plateau in use of osteoporosis treatment at a level that is too low to make a meaningful impact on societal fracture burden is problematic given the predicted increased age-specific hip fracture rates., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of bone fractures. Bone mineral density (BMD) is increased and bone turnover is low in type 2 diabetes and the increased BMD does not explain the increased fracture risk. However, the low bone turnover may lead to insufficient bone renewal with unrepaired micro-cracks and thus increase fracture risk. Ingestion of food acutely decreases bone resorption markers and the macronutrient composition of meals and meal frequency may influence bone metabolism adversely in subjects with unhealthy eating patterns, e.g., patients with type 2 diabetes., Areas Covered: The treatment strategy of bone disease in type 2 diabetics is covered in this review. The current management of diabetic bone disease consists of anti-osteoporotic treatment. However, anti-resorptives may further reduce an already low bone turnover with uncertain effects. Furthermore, the acute and long-term effects of meal ingestion, weight loss alone and in combination with exercise as well as the possible underlying mechanisms are covered in this systematic review., Expert Commentary: Current management of diabetic bone disease is based on principles of anti-osteoporotic treatment in non-diabetic subjects. However, studies are urged to investigate whether anti-resorptives are equally beneficial in type 2 diabetes as in non-diabetic individuals.

Purpose: Medical treatment of osteoporosis should preferably be both effective and have minimal side effects. The aim of the present study was to examine long-term benefits and risks of parathyroid hormone (PTH) treatment in compliant patients., Methods: This is a nationwide retrospective cohort study based on national registers in which we identified 1739 patients treated with PTH (2003-2010) (index cases) for at least 18 months and with a medication possession rate of > 0.8. For comparison, patients treated with bisphosphonate (BP) (n = 13,131) and anti-osteoporotic treatment-naïve controls (n = 12,721) were selected. Incidence of fractures, drug consumption, and comorbidity were compared between the three cohorts. Mean follow-up of the PTH-treated patients was 4.3 years (range 1.8-8.7 years)., Results: Before initiation of treatment, PTH patients had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index score and more osteoporotic fractures than both BP patients and controls. No difference was detected in the incidence of fractures during PTH treatment or years after between PTH patients and BP patients. No significant difference in the use of drugs was seen between PTH and BP patients, except for PPI intake which was higher in PTH patients. No significant increases were found in the incidence of cancers or other ICD-10 diagnoses among PTH-treated patients in comparison with both BP and controls., Conclusion: Overall, PTH treatment is effective and safe. Following PTH treatment in compliant patients, neither fracture incidence nor drug consumption differed between PTH-treated and BP-treated patients, despite the fact that PTH-treated patients had more severe osteoporosis. No increased incidence of malignant diseases or other diseases was detected.

The benefits of pharmaceutical treatment for osteoporosis may be limited for a number of patients, as they continue to experience fractures. Alternative treatments may be considered for subjects whom remain at high risk for future fractures., Introduction: Previous studies have investigated the effects of good adherence to anti-osteoporosis medication. However, very few studies have described why some patients experience fractures and loss of BMD despite adherence to treatment. The aim of this study was to estimate the proportion of patients at high risk for fracture despite being compliant to bisphosphonate treatment and examine which factors influence why some osteoporotic patients remain at a high risk for fracture despite being compliant to bisphosphonate treatment., Methods: This case-control study is based on Danish national health registry data. The subjects had to have either one BMD test or a fracture prior to inclusion. "High-risk" subjects (cases) were defined as BMD t-score < =-2.5 SD, any drop in BMD from baseline or a fracture 24-36 months following inclusion., Results: A total of 2406 subjects (66.3 % women; 33.7 % men) fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and of these, 352 (14.6 %) were identified as high risk subjects. A multiple logistical regression analysis showed that high risk subjects were more likely to have lower plasma calcium and/or vitamin D levels (OR: 2.9) and were more frequently diagnosed with hyperparathyroidism (OR: 2.6)., Conclusion: Based on Danish national health registry data, 14.6 % patients were identified as patients remaining at high risk for fracture despite being compliant to bisphosphonate treatment. Lower plasma calcium and/or vitamin D level is the greatest predictor of high risk for fracture despite persistent bisphosphonate treatment. Secondary causes of osteoporosis should be considered and alternative treatments may be advised for subjects whom remain at high risk.

We estimated the rate of compliance with oral bisphosphonates among Danish women and examined its association with health care resource use and cost. Approximately 30 % of Danish females aged >55 who take bisphosphonates are noncompliant, and noncompliance is significantly associated with increased health care resource use and cost., Introduction: Two objectives of this study were to estimate the rate of oral bisphosphonate compliance among Danish women and to examine the association of noncompliance with health care resource use and cost., Methods: Women ≥55 with an index prescription claim for an oral bisphosphonate were identified from Danish national health registries between 2003 and 2008. Compliance was measured as the medication possession ratio (MPR) during the first 12 months post-index. Cost and health care resource use were collected for the following 12 months., Results: Among the 38,234 women meeting the study inclusion criteria, 29.9 % were noncompliant (MPR <70 %). Younger age was associated with higher odds of compliance (OR [95 % CI] 1.22 [1.15-1.29] for ages 55-64 and 1.18 [1.12-1.24] for ages 65-74; reference age group ≥75 years). Rates of all-cause health care resource use were significantly higher in noncompliant subjects: 28.9 versus 23.0 % had inpatient admissions, 16.5 versus 13.0 % had emergency room visits, and 48.7 versus 43.3 % used outpatient services (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The total mean (SD) all-cause cost per patient (excluding office visits) was €626 (2344) and €4178 (7854), respectively. The mean (SD) osteoporosis-related cost per patient (excluding office visits) was €572 (2085) and €754 (2857) for compliant and non-compliant subjects, respectively. The compliant subjects accrued significantly lower all-cause and OP-related cost than noncompliant subjects, regardless of whether the total cost or medical cost only was considered., Conclusions: Approximately 30 % of Danish females aged 55 or older who take bisphosphonates are noncompliant. Noncompliance is significantly associated with increased health care resource use and cost.

Oral bisphosphonates (BPs) are highly effective in preventing fractures and are recommended first-line therapies for patients with osteoporosis. We identified the incidence and predictors of oral BP treatment failure, defined as the incidence of two or more fractures while on treatment (≥2 FWOT) among users with high adherence. Fractures were considered from 6 months after treatment initiation and up to 6 months after discontinuation. Data from computerized records and pharmacy invoices were obtained from Sistema d'Informació per al Desenvolupament de l'Investigació en Atenció Primària (SIDIAP; Catalonia, Spain) and Danish Health Registries (Denmark) for all incident users of oral BPs in 2006-2007 and 2000-2001, respectively. Fine and Gray survival models using backward-stepwise selection (p-entry 0.049; p- exit 0.10) and accounting for the competing risk of therapy cessation were used to identify predictors of ≥2 FWOT among patients having persisted with treatment ≥6 months with overall medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80%. Incidence of ≥2 FWOT was 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 3.2) and 1.7 (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.2) per 1000 patient-years (PYs) within Catalonia and Denmark, respectively. Older age was predictive of ≥2 FWOT in both Catalonian and Danish cohorts: subhazard ratio (SHR) = 2.28 (95% CI, 1.11 to 4.68) and SHR = 2.61 (95% CI, 0.98 to 6.95), respectively, for 65 to <80 years; and SHR = 3.19 (95% CI, 1.33 to 7.69) and SHR = 4.88 (95% CI, 1.74 to 13.7), respectively, for ≥80 years. Further significant predictors of ≥2 FWOT identified within only one cohort were dementia, SHR = 4.46 (95% CI, 1.02 to 19.4) (SIDIAP); and history of recent or older fracture, SHR = 3.40 (95% CI, 1.50 to 7.68) and SHR = 2.08 (95% CI: 1.04-4.15), respectively (Denmark). Even among highly adherent users of oral BP therapy, a minority sustain multiple fractures while on treatment. Older age was predictive of increased risk within both study populations, as was history of recent/old fracture and dementia within one but not both populations. Additional and/or alternative strategies should be investigated for these patients., (© 2015 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Diabetes and osteoporosis are both frequent conditions, and they may thus occur simultaneously by chance. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that hyperglycemia may impair bone matrix formation and biochemical competence. Decreased biomechanical competence may be present even in a setting of increased bone mineral density, as assessed by traditional dual energy X-ray absorptiometry or normal structural parameters by quantitative computed tomography. Also, the absence of endogenous insulin secretion in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and insulin resistance or, in some cases, frank hyperinsulinemia in T2D may play a role., (© 2015 European Society of Endocrinology.)

One in five men over the age of 50 years will suffer an osteoporotic fracture during their lifetime, and men who sustain fractures have an increased mortality risk compared to women. Three bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate and zolendronic acid), denosumab, strontium ranelate and teriparatide are currently approved in Denmark for the treatment of osteoporosis in men. This review summarizes the available therapeutic options.

Unlabelled: The association between hyponatremia and osteoporosis was evaluated in humans. A significant association was found between low sodium levels, lower bone mineralization in the hip, and with several common conditions. Hyponatremia could be used as a marker of osteoporosis and systemic disease., Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between hyponatremia and osteoporosis in humans through a cross-sectional study., Methods: Patient information was gathered from regional and national Danish patient databases, both in- and outpatient settings, from 2004 to 2011. Patients with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans performed within this time were included if accompanied [Na+] was measured within 14 days prior or past the scan date. A total of 1575 patients were included., Results: A total of 104 patients were hyponatremic (6.6 %). Total hip and lumbar spine bone mineral content (BMC) and densities (BMD) and T-scores were all significantly lower with hyponatremia. The odds ratio (OR) of osteoporosis significantly increased among hyponatremic patients at both total hip (unadjusted OR = 2.17, 95% CI = [1.40-3.34], p < .05) and lumbar spine (unadjusted OR = 1.83, 95% CI = [1.20-2.80], p < .05) regions. Dose-response found between increasing [Na+] and increasing total hip BMC (slope .174, adjusted p < .05), BMD (slope .004, adjusted p < .05), and T-score (slope .034, adjusted p < .05). Systemic disease was more prevalent in hyponatremia., Conclusion: The presence of hyponatremia increases the risk of concurrent osteoporosis at both the total hip and lumbar spine in humans. Hyponatremia could be used a screening tool and marker of secondary osteoporosis.

Unlabelled: Medical intervention is important in the treatment of osteoporosis, and compliance with medical treatment is essential for an optimal outcome. Based on Danish national registers, we found that compliance with parathyroid hormone (PTH) treatment is high and associated with marital status, working status, and type of PTH treatment., Purpose: Compliance and persistence are essential for an optimal outcome during medical treatment of osteoporosis. We aimed to evaluate compliance and persistence with treatment with PTH in daily clinical practice in Danish patients and to describe factors affecting compliance., Methods: Register-based nationwide cohort study on all patients in Denmark initiates PTH or analogue treatment for osteoporosis in 2003-2010 (n = 4281). PTH drugs included were the PTH analogue teriparatide(1-34) and recombinant human PTH (rhPTH(1-84)). Compliance with treatment was calculated by using medication possession ratio (MPR)., Results: In the study period, 3702 patients were exclusively treated with teriparatide and 579 were exclusively treated with rhPTH(1-84). We found that for patients persistent with therapy for at least 18 months and with MPR >0.8, 83 % of the patients in the teriparatide group were compliant versus 72 % in the recombinant PTH group (p < 0.01). Being married/cohabiting, still in the labor market, and taking teriparatide were significantly associated with higher compliance, whereas age, gender, level of education, income, alcoholism, and Charlson comorbidity index were not associated with compliance., Conclusion: Compliance with PTH treatment overall is high, with teriparatide compliance higher than rhPTH(1-84), in patients persistent to therapy for 18 months. Compliance is associated with marital status, working status, and type of PTH treatment.

Testosterone stimulates longitudinal and appositional growth during childhood, whereas estrogen induces epiphysial closure. During adulthood, testosterone continues to stimulate periosteal growth, whereas estrogen is important for the maintenance of trabecular bone mass and structure. In males, testosterone is aromatized to estradiol. Both free and bioavailable plasma levels of testosterone and estradiol decrease with age in males, and fracture risk is associated with low estradiol levels. Testosterone may increase muscle mass and prevent fractures related to falls. Younger hypogonadal males should be treated with testosterone to attain peak bone mass and increase bone mineral density (BMD). Older hypogonadal males should be treated in cases of osteoporosis, reduced muscle strength and increased risk of falling. Secondary hyperparathyroidism caused by calcium and vitamin D insufficiency may reduce bone mass and strength and increase fracture risk and should be avoided. Since calcium supplementation has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications and renal stones, the dose should be tailored to the habitual daily calcium intake. Lifestyle-related risk factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, lack of physical activity and low body weight) should be addressed. The antifracture efficacy of antiresorptive and anabolic treatment for osteoporosis has not been documented in larger randomized controlled studies. However, changes in BMD and bone markers suggest similar effects in males and females of bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, zoledronic acid), nasal calcitonin, denosumab and teriparatide (parathyroid hormone [1-34]). The antiresorptive drugs should be used in males with BMD T-score less than -2.5 and one or more risk factors, or with hip and vertebral fractures. It seems appropriate to recommend a higher cut-off T-score (e.g. less than -1.0 standard deviation [SD]) in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy because of the fast initial bone loss. Anabolic treatment should be used in more severe spinal fracture cases, including glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Background: Osteoporosis is a debilitating condition characterized by fractures, pain and premature death. Risk factors for osteoporosis predict the risk of fragility fractures., Aim: To describe the occurrence of risk factors for osteoporosis among populations in Nuuk, the capital of Greenland., Methods: A random sample of women born in 1934-42, 1945-47, 1956, and men born in 1956 were selected from the national civil registry. A questionnaire was sent out in Greenlandic and Danish on risk factors for osteoporosis: family history, smoking habits, alcohol intake, presence of disease, sun exposure, intake of dairy products, age at menopause (women) and number of falls. Additional questions included the frequency of back pain, previous fractures, intake of vitamin D and calcium supplements, use of anti-osteoporotic drugs, steroids and other drugs., Results: The questionnaire was sent to 317 subjects confirmed to be living at an address in Nuuk and 181 (57.1%) responded. More young women than older women were smokers (60.6% vs. 35.0%; p=0.022) while limited sun exposure was reported by more of the old women (37.2% vs. 5.6%; p=0.003). Family history of osteoporosis was reported by 15.0%, without difference between groups. Alcohol and milk intake did not differ between groups. Premature menopause was reported by 17.9% of the women. Falls within the last year were reported by 42.4% with fewer falls in the oldest age group (21.9% vs. 50.0%; p=0.005). Frequency of fragility fractures increased with age (5.7% vs. 24.3% vs. 30.4%; p=0.02) and the risk of a fragility fracture increased with age (p=0.004; OR, 95% CI: 4.5, 1.6-12.2, reference: below 70 years), when adjusted for smoking, gender and falls. The use of anti-osteoporotic drugs was low (3.4%) while 28.8% took calcium and vitamin D supplements., Conclusions: Age is a dominating risk factor for fragility fractures in Greenland. The use of anti-osteoporotic drugs is low in Greenland, even if osteoporotic fractures are common in old age.

Both chronic kidney disease and osteoporosis are frequent conditions in the general population. Most drugs for treating osteoporosis seem safe in terms of affecting renal function for patients with mildly to moderate decreased renal function. There are very few data on the efficacy (reduction in fracture risk) or safety in patients with severely decreased renal function (glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min) or on dialysis.

Background: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) may be at increased risk of fractures owing to osteoporosis and falling., Objective: To evaluate the risk of fracture in incident MS patients drawn from a dedicated MS registry compared with population-based controls., Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study (1996-2007) utilising the Danish National Health Registers that were linked to the Danish MS Registry and the Danish MS Treatment Registry. Incident MS patients (2963 cases) were 1:6 matched by year of birth, gender, calendar time and region to persons without MS (controls). Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression were used to estimate the risk of fracture in MS. Time-dependent adjustments were made for age, history of diseases and drug use., Results: Compared with controls, patients with MS had no overall increased risk of fracture (adjusted hazard ratio (adj. HR): 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9-1.2). However, the risk of femur/hip fracture (adj. HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.4) was significantly increased compared to controls. As compared with unexposed patients, MS patients who had been exposed to a short course of methylprednisolone in the prior year had no significantly increased risk of osteoporotic fracture (adj. HR: 1.2, 95% CI: 0.5-2.9). Disabled MS patients with Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] scores between 6 and 10, had a 2.6-fold increased risk of osteoporotic fracture (adjusted odds ratio (adj. OR): 2.6, 95% CI: 1.0-6.6) compared to patients with an EDSS score between 0 and 3., Conclusion: Patients with MS had a higher risk of femur/hip fracture than controls. Disability status is probably more important than glucocorticoid use in the aetiology of MS and osteoporotic fracture.

Background: Platelet inhibitors are widely used in the treatment and prevention of coronary artery disease. In addition to acetylsalicylic acid, two major groups of platelet inhibitors are used; phosphodiesterase inhibitors including dipyridamole, and thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel). Clopidogrel is the most widely used, and in combination with acetylsalicylic acid it is the standard of care for acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions. However, the modes of action involve pathways that are involved in the metabolic activity in bone cells and pharmacologic modulation of these pathways may therefore have effects on bone., Methods: In the current study, we assessed the association between platelet inhibitor use and fracture incidence in a population-based epidemiological study performed within the Danish population consisting of approximately 5.3 million individuals, where all patients sustaining a fracture during the year of 2000 were included (124,655 cases). The hypotheses were to investigate if use of thienopyridines or phosphodiesterase inhibitors were associated with increased risk of fractures after adjustment for potential confounders., Results: We found that treatment with dipyridamole is associated with increased overall fracture risk, but not to the risk of osteoporotic fractures. In contrast, low-dose acetylsalicylic acid is associated to increased risk of overall fractures and fractures of the hip. Finally, in the current study clopidogrel is not associated with increased fracture risk., Conclusions: Use of some oral platelet inhibitors is associated with increased risk of fractures, and more studies are warranted to determine the potential effect of platelet inhibitors on bone metabolism in vivo., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Use of antidepressant medications that act on the serotonin system has been linked to detrimental impacts on bone mineral density (BMD), and to osteoporosis. This article reviews current evidence for such effects, and identifies themes for future research. Serotonin receptors are found in all major types of bone cell (osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts), indicating an important role of the neuroendocrine system in bone. Observational studies indicate a complex relationship between depression, antidepressants, and fracture. First, the presence of depression itself increases fracture risk, in relation with decreased BMD and an increase in falls. A range of aspects of depression may operate, including behavioral factors (e.g., smoking and nutrition), biological changes, and confounders (e.g., comorbidities and concomitant medications). A substantial proportion of depressed patients receive antidepressants, mostly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Some of these have been linked to decreased BMD (SSRIs) and increased fracture risk (SSRIs and tricyclic agents). Current use of SSRIs and tricyclics increases fracture risk by as much as twofold versus nonusers, even after adjustment for potential confounders. While there is a dose-response relationship for SSRIs, the effect does not appear to be homogeneous across the whole class of drugs and may be linked to affinity for the serotonin transporter system. The increase in risk is the greatest in the early stages of treatment, with a dramatic increase after initiation, reaching a peak within 1 month for tricyclics and 8 months for SSRIs. Treatment-associated increased risk diminishes towards baseline in the year following discontinuation. The body of evidence suggests that SSRIs should be considered in the list of medications that are risk factors for osteoporotic fractures., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We studied the effects of increasing age, dosage, and duration of parathyroid hormone (PTH) treatment on changes in bone mineral density (BMD). Randomized placebo controlled trials on PTH treatment in men or women were retrieved from PubMed (1951 to present), Web of Science (1945 to present), or Embase (1974 to present). The search date was November 16, 2010. All studies comparing PTH treatment to either placebo or antiresorptive drugs--for example, bisphosphonates or hormone replacement therapy--were included. A total of 214 studies were identified in the initial search, and 15 of these trials were included. By metaregression analysis, we found that the increase in spine BMD (Z-score) after PTH treatment was blunted by increasing age (R(2) = 0.27; 2p = 0.01, slope -0.023 Z-scores per year, 11 studies). By increasing PTH dosage (μg/d), spine BMD increased significantly (2p = 0.002) with a slope of +0.011 Z-scores/μg/d of teriparatide. Furthermore, the duration of treatment was positively correlated to spine BMD (P < 0.001) with a slope of +0.043 Z-score for each extra month of treatment. We evaluated the BMD effect in hips and found no age dependency (R(2) = 0.04; P = 0.66; 8 studies). However, for the spine, we found a significant relation to daily dosage (P = 0.011), Z-score coefficient 0.0051 ± 0.0020 (2p < 0.01). The treatment duration also correlated positively by a Z-score coefficient of 0.0170 ± 0.0053, 2p < 0.01 per extra month of treatment. PTH treatment alone seems to be able to improve BMD significantly. However, the BMD increase was significantly lower with increasing age in the spine. No age dependency was observed in the hips. In general the effect of treatment was improved with increasing dosage and duration of treatment from 6 to 36 months.

We studied the association between bisphosphonate use and risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or atherosclerosis of the coronary vessels using a nationwide retrospective cohort from Denmark. All users of bisphosphonates and other drugs against osteoporosis between 1996 and 2006 (n = 103,562) comprised the exposed group and three age- and gender-matched controls from the general population (n = 310,683), the unexposed group. The main outcomes were occurrence of AMI or atherosclerosis of the coronary vessels. An excess risk of AMI was seen in users of alendronate compared to the unexposed. However, an inverse dose-response relationship was seen, with an increased risk in those with low adherence (≤0.66 DDD, HR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.24-1.82) and a nonsignificantly decreased risk in those who were adherent to the drug (≥1 DDD, HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.09; P for trend <0.01). For etidronate and raloxifene, no excess risk was present and no dose-response relationship was seen. For atherosclerosis of the coronary vessels, a similar trend as for AMI was seen for alendronate but a protective effect was present at high doses (≥1 DDD, HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.49-0.70). For etidronate, an increased risk of atherosclerosis was seen at all doses, with no dose-response relationship. For raloxifene, no excess of atherosclerosis was observed. At high doses of alendronate a decreased risk of atherosclerosis of the coronary vessels was seemingly present, whereas at low doses an increased risk was present. The finding may be spurious due to the "healthy user" effect, but a causal relationship cannot be excluded.

We studied the association between bisphosphonate use and risk of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in a nationwide retrospective cohort from Denmark. All users of bisphosphonates and other drugs against osteoporosis between 1996 and 2006 (n = 103,562) were used as the exposed group, with three age- and gender-matched controls from the general population (n = 310,683) as the nonexposed group. The main outcome was occurrence of cancer of the esophagus, ventricle, small intestine, colon, pancreas, gallbladder or bile duct, or liver. Except for colon cancer, most of the GI cancers were rare. For clodronate and raloxifene, no excess risk was present for any of the GI cancers. For alendronate, an excess risk of esophageal and liver cancer was observed; however, the excess risk was most pronounced at low doses and short duration of observation. No dose-response relationship was present except for colon cancer with alendronate, where a decrease was seen with increasing dose so that at high doses a seemingly protective effect was present (≥1 defined daily dose, HR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.14-0.62). For etidronate, an excess risk of esophageal, liver, pancreas, and gallbladder and bile duct cancers was seen. Again, no relationship with dose or duration of observation was present. An excess risk of esophageal and liver cancers may be seen with alendronate and etidronate. However, the association may not be causal as no dose-response or time relationship was present. For colon cancer, the decline with increasing alendronate dose may be due to a "healthy user" effect.

A decreased risk of breast cancer has been reported among patients given bisphosphonates. The present aims were to study potential associations between different antiosteoporosis drugs, including bisphosphonates, and the risk of breast cancer before and after start of treatment and to appraise possible dose-effect relationships. From national Danish registers, all female users of bisphosphonates aged ≥40 years and other drugs against osteoporosis between 1996 and 2006 were identified (n = 87,104). This cohort was compared with a control group, where each patient was matched on age with three nonexposed women from the general population (n = 261,322). Before start of most drugs against osteoporosis an increased risk of breast cancer was seen compared to controls (e.g., adjusted OR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.16 for alendronate). This excess risk was higher in younger women (e.g., OR = 4.48, 95% CI 2.98-6.75 for alendronate in women ≤50 years) and disappeared in women older than 70 years (e.g., OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-1.01 for alendronate). In contrast, a decreased risk of breast cancer was seen after start of alendronate (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.73), etidronate (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.89), and raloxifene (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.73). No dose-response relationship was present for alendronate and etidronate, whereas a decreasing risk was seen with increasing daily dose of raloxifene. Bisphosphonate treatment in women was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, no causal relationship seemed to be present.

Unlabelled: Prior studies have associated fatal stroke with raloxifene. In a cohort study, we found no excess risk of stroke with raloxifene; whereas, an excess risk of stroke and fatal stroke was seen with alendronate and etidronate. However, the excess risks were small., Purpose: We aim to study the association between use of raloxifene and other drugs against osteoporosis and risk of stroke., Methods: This is a nationwide cohort study from Denmark. All users of bisphosphonates and other drugs against osteoporosis between 1996 and 2006 (n = 103,562) as exposed group and three age- and gender-matched controls from the general population (n = 310,683)., Results: Before the drugs were started, patients later initiating alendronate or raloxifene had fewer strokes than the controls. In contrast, patients who later did start clodronate have more strokes. Among the later users of other bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate or parathyroid hormone, no change in the risk of stroke was present. Patients who started raloxifene neither had an excess risk of strokes nor of fatal strokes. No dose-response relationship was present. Among users of alendronate, a decreasing overall risk of stroke was seen with increasing dose. However, for fatal strokes, the risk increased with increasing dose of alendronate. Among users of etidronate, no trend with dose was present for overall stroke risk; whereas for fatal strokes, an increasing risk was seen with increasing dose of etidronate., Conclusions: Raloxifene does not seem associated with an excess risk of strokes. The increase seen for alendronate did not seem to be causal as no classical dose-response relationship was present. The dose-response relationship for fatal strokes with alendronate and etidronate needs further examination. However, the excess risks were small and may be due to the underlying disease.

Unlabelled: Prior studies have suggested an association between bisphosphonate use and subtrochanteric fractures. This cohort study showed an increased risk of subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures both before and after the start of drugs against osteoporosis including bisphosphonates. This may suggest an effect of the underlying disease rather than the drugs used., Introduction: The objective of this study is to determine the association between drugs against osteoporosis and the risk of femoral shaft and subtrochanteric fractures. No separation was made between atypical and typical fractures., Methods: Nationwide cohort study from Denmark with all users of bisphosphonates and other drugs against osteoporosis between 1996 and 2006 (n = 103,562) as exposed group and three age- and gender-matched controls from the general population (n = 310,683). Adjustments were made for prior fracture, use of systemic hormone therapy, and use of systemic corticosteroids., Results: After initiation of therapy, an increased risk of subtrochanteric fractures was seen for alendronate (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.78-3.27), etidronate (HR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.62-2.36), and clodronate (HR = 20.0, 95% CI 1.94-205), but not for raloxifene (HR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.34-3.32). However, an increased risk of subtrochanteric fractures was also present before the start of alendronate (OR = 2.36, 95% CI 2.05-2.72), etidronate (OR = 3.05, 95% CI 2.59-3.58), clodronate (OR = 10.8, 95% CI 1.14-103), raloxifene (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.07-3.40), and strontium ranelate (OR = 2.97, 95% CI 1.07-8.27). Similar trends were seen for femoral shaft fractures and overall fracture risk. After the start of etidronate, no dose-response relationship was present (p for trend, 0.54). For alendronate, a decreasing risk was present with increasing average daily dose (p for trend, <0.01)., Conclusions: Although an increased risk of femoral shaft and subtrochanteric fractures are seen with the use of several types of bisphosphonates, the increased risk before the start of the drugs may point at an effect of the underlying disease being treated. The increased risk may, thus, perhaps be due to confounding by indication.

Denosumab is a new biological (monoclonal antibody) antiresorptive treatment of osteoporosis which is administrated as a subcutaneous 60 mg injection twice a year. Compared with placebo, three years of treatment increases bone mineral density by 6-9% and decreases the risk of vertebral and hip fractures by 68% and 40%, respectively, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. In men with iatrogenic hypogonadism due to prostate cancer, the risk of vertebral fractures is decreased by 62%. Side effects are few, but the treatment may increase risk of infections.

Prior studies have indicated an excess risk of gastroduodenal ulcers and esophagus perforations with the use of bisphosphonates. However, little is known about the contribution of comorbid conditions and concomitant drug use on this risk. We studied the risk of esophagus and gastric events in patients on a wide range of drugs against osteoporosis both before and after initiation of these drugs. We studied a nationwide register-based cohort from Denmark with all users of drugs against osteoporosis between 1996 and 2006 (n = 103,562) as cases and three age- and sex-matched controls from the general population (n = 310,683). In a crude analysis, most drugs were already associated with an increased risk of esophagitis, esophageal ulcerations, or esophageal perforations or gastroduodenal ulcers before initiation of the drugs. Upon adjustment, this excess risk disappeared for most drugs except parathyroid hormone and its analogues, etidronate and clodronate. Only for etidronate, alendronate, and raloxifene were sufficient data present for events after initiation of the drugs, and for these, an increased risk was present for all events except gastroduodenal ulcers with raloxifene. Several drugs against osteoporosis are associated with an increased risk of esophagitis, esophageal ulcers, esophageal perforation, and gastroduodenal ulcers. However, the increase was already present before initiation of the drug for several types of drugs against osteoporosis. This points at an effect of the underlying condition being treated or comorbid conditions and drugs being provided in patients with osteoporosis, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids.

Drugs can affect the skeleton in different ways. Antiepileptic drugs were not associated with any major fracture risk. Lithium was associated with a decreased fracture risk. Insulin, sulphonylureas and metformin were associated with a decreased risk, whereas glitazones were associated with an increased risk. Blood pressure lowering drugs, thiazide diuretics and nitroglycerin were associated with a decreased risk of fractures, whereas amiodarone and loop diuretics were associated with an increased risk. Pain medication varied from no effect to an increased fracture risk.

Decreased renal function and osteoporosis are both frequent conditions in the general population. Most drugs for treating osteoporosis seem safe for patients with mildly decreased renal function (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] 60-90 ml/min). In patients with a moderately decreased GFR of 30-60 ml/min, there are very few studies with BMD as endpoint. Most drugs seem safe in terms of affecting renal function. The aim should be to control calcium and vitamin D metabolism in patients with severely decreased renal function (GFR<30 ml/min) or on dialysis.

The improved survival and cure rate of breast cancer patients leads to increased diagnosis of later occurring side effects to therapy such as osteoporosis. Conventional chemotherapies such as CMF and CEF are known to induce premature menopause, which increases bone loss but these therapies have additional detrimental effects on bone. The loss in bone mass during chemotherapy is substantial and may lead to increased fracture risk. The influence of taxanes on bone is less well known. Whereas tamoxifen has a slight protective effect on bone loss the opposite is true for aromatase inhibitors. Adverse effect reportings show, that adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women increases the risk of clinical fractures as compared to tamoxifen. The Danish Bone Society suggests that all women with operable breast cancer have their fracture risk evaluated including a BMD measurement prior to initiation of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy as a part of the standard examination program. If osteoporosis is diagnosed, anti-osteoporosis therapies should be considered. Moreover, all women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy should be informed of the risk of bone loss and should receive life style advice of how to preserve bone. Adjuvant regimens in breast cancer patients improve survival and cure rates. Therefore it is preferable to use such therapies although they increase risk of side effects such as osteoporosis.

Background: Cardiac arrhythmias and osteoporotic fractures are common in the elderly., Aim: We studied whether tachyarrhythmia and/or the drugs used to treat arrhythmias affect risk of fracture., Methods: In a population-based nation-wide pharmaco-epidemiological case-control design, we compared 124,655 patients that sustained a fracture during 2000 with 373,962 age- and gender-matched controls. We used computerized registers to assess individual drug use and related these data to individual fracture data and information on confounders., Results: Risk of any fracture was increased in patients with atrial fibrillation [Odds ratio (OR): 1.14; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.08-1.21] and in patients currently treated with amiodarone (OR: 1.47; 95%CI: 1.21-1.78). Conversely, current use of digoxin decreased fracture risk (OR: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.71-0.79). Subanalysis showed similar effects in men and in women, but drug treatment only affected fracture risk in subjects older than 65 years of age. In current users of digoxin, risk of any fracture and risk of hip and forearm fracture decreased dose-dependently with increased dose. The use of other antiarrhythmics did not affect fracture risk., Conclusion: Special attention should be paid to patients on treatment with amiodarone and/or a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation as they may have an increased risk of fracture. Conversely, treatment with digoxin may reduce fracture risk.

Aim: The effects of parathyroid hormone (PTH) alone or in combination with antiresorptive therapy on changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk were studied., Materials and Methods: Randomised placebo controlled trials were retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science or Embase databases., Results: PTH alone or in combination with antiresorptive drugs reduced vertebral [relative risk (RR)=0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-0.47, 2p<0.01] and non-vertebral (RR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.82, 2p<0.01) fracture risk and increased spine BMD by 6.6% (95% CI: 5.2-8.1%, 2p<0.01) and hip BMD non-significantly by 1.0% (95% CI: -0.1 to 2.1%, 2p=0.08) during 11-36 months of follow-up (13 trials). The gain in spine and hip BMD tended to increase with the length of the PTH treatment. No significant effect of study duration on fracture risk could be demonstrated. The major adverse events were hypercalcaemia, nausea and discomfort at the injection sites. Only limited data are currently available on fracture risk reduction with PTH plus antiresorptive therapies., Conclusion: Although the number of studies on non-vertebral fractures is limited, our pooled analysis revealed that PTH alone or in combination with antiresorptive drugs would appear to be able to reduce the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures and to increase spine and perhaps hip BMD. However, these analyses were based on cross-sectional data--i.e. based on indirect comparisons--and further studies with a direct comparison of study duration are necessary. No studies comparing PTH, PTH plus antiresorptive drugs and antiresorptive drug versus placebo in a factorial design are available; consequently, we were unable to draw any conclusions on the superiority of PTH plus antiresorptive drug versus antiresorptive drug or PTH alone with respect to BMD or fractures.

Unlabelled: In the non-HRT arms of the DOPS study, 10-year fracture risk was higher at each level of T score than predicted by the Kanis algorithm. Under-reporting of fractures in registers and inclusion of HRT users are probable explanations for inappropriately low fracture risk estimates for younger women., Introduction: International recommendations highlight the importance of absolute fracture risk in establishing intervention thresholds. The available estimates of long-term risk have been derived by combining relative risks from meta-analyses with U.S. normative BMD data and Swedish fracture incidence records. We validated the 2001 Kanis risk algorithm using incident fractures observed in untreated women in the first 10 years of the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study (DOPS). Comparisons were also made with the relative risks derived from a recent meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies., Materials and Methods: We analyzed DXA of the spine and hip from 872 women who were enrolled in the non-hormone replacement therapy (HRT) arms of the study and had not received HRT, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene. We collected verified reports of fractures at each visit. We focused on fractures of the hip, spine, shoulder, and forearm to provide risks comparable with the Kanis algorithm. Accordingly, asymptomatic radiographic vertebral fractures were not included., Results: Seventy-eight women (9%) sustained relevant fractures. The risk of fracture increased by 1.32 (95% CI, 1.02; 1.70) for each unit decrease in femoral neck T score and by 1.30 (95% CI, 1.06; 1.58) for each unit decrease in lumbar spine T score at baseline. Absolute fracture risk was higher than expected from the Kanis algorithm at all T score levels. The difference was greatest for participants in the higher range of T scores. At T = -1, the observed risk was 10.9% as opposed to an expected risk of 5.7%. Relative risk gradients were similar to those of the recent meta-analysis., Conclusions: In healthy women, examined in the first year or two after menopause, 10-year fracture risk was higher at each level of BMD T score than expected from the model by Kanis et al. Inclusion of HRT users in the cohorts used may have led to higher BMD values and lower absolute fracture risk in the Kanis model. These longitudinal data can be used directly in estimating absolute fracture risk in untreated north European women from BMD at menopause.

This meta-analysis assesses the effects of epilepsy on fracture risk and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with epilepsy. A search of PubMed was conducted using the key words epilepsy, fracture, and bone mineral. A weighted estimate of relative risk of fractures and changes in BMD (Z-score) was calculated. From the changes in BMD, expected increase in relative fracture risk was calculated. A total of 11 studies on fracture risk and 12 studies on BMD were retrieved. The relative risk of any fracture was increased (2.2, 95% CI: 1.9-2.5, five studies), as was the risk of hip (5.3, 3.2-8.8, six studies), forearm (1.7, 1.2-2.3, six studies), and spine fractures (6.2, 2.5-15.5, three studies). A large proportion of fractures (35%) seemed related to seizures. Spine (mean +/- SEM: -0.38 +/- 0.06) and hip (-0.56 +/- 0.06) BMD Z-scores were significantly decreased, hip more than spine (2P < 0.05). The expected increases in relative risk of any fracture from BMD Z-scores were 1.2-1.3, and significantly lower than observed (2P < 0.05). The deficit in BMD in patients with epilepsy is too small to explain the observed increase in fracture risk. The remainder of the increase in fracture risk may be linked to seizures.

Aim: To compare the number of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in Denmark, with the number of subjects expected to have osteoporosis., Subjects and Methods: From the National Hospital Discharge Register, records for all patients diagnosed with osteoporosis and/or with osteoporotic fractures between 1995 and 1999 were retrieved. Based on normal Danish values for BMD, the expected number of subjects aged 50 years or more with osteoporosis according to the WHO definition was calculated., Results: The estimated prevalence of osteoporosis was 40.8% of women aged >or=50 years and 17.7% among men. The expected annual incidence was 58,658/million inhabitants in women >or=50 years of age and 23,648/million in men >or=50 years. However, the observed incidence was only 4,823 and 862/million per year, respectively (8.2% and 3.6% of the expected). In 1999, a total of 34,691 hip, spine, and forearm fractures were reported in subjects >or=50 years, and of these, 18,566 were potentially attributable to osteoporosis (14,240 fractures in women and 4,326 in men equaling 14,976 and 5,297/million per year). Only 0.3% of men >or=50 years were receiving a bisphosphonate, while 2.2% of women received a bisphosphonate or raloxifene. Among women >or=50 years, 27.7% received hormone replacement therapy., Conclusions: Osteoporotic fractures of the hip, spine, and forearm are rather frequent in Denmark, but the diagnosis of osteoporosis is rarely used. It seems that osteoporosis is markedly underdiagnosed and undertreated in Denmark as probably also elsewhere. This may have significant implications for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures.

Decreased bone mineral density is a frequent finding in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Factors contributing to this are: 1) malabsorption of vitamin D, calcium and possibly vitamin K and other nutrients, 2) treatment with corticosteroids, 3) inflammatory cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease, and 4) hypogonadism induced by the inflammatory bowel disease. Among patients with Crohn's disease from 32% to 38% have osteopenia (Z-scores <-1), and among patients with ulcerative colitis 23% to 25% have osteopenia. The mean deficit was 0.44+/-0.08 Z-scores in the spine in Crohn's disease and 0.34+/-0.08 in ulcerative colitis. A similar deficit was seen in the hip in both conditions. From these deficits, an increase in overall fracture risk of 1.1-1.3 should be expected. The observed excess fracture risk was limited compared to the general population in both Crohn's disease (RR=1.2, 95% CI: 0.9-1.6 for any fracture and 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.0 for spine fractures) and ulcerative colitis (RR=1.1, 95% CI: 1-1.2 for any fracture, and 1.5, 95% CI: 0.9-2.5 for spine fractures). The observed excess fracture risk was close to that expected from the changes in BMD. Despite the limited excess fracture risk, a relatively large percentage of all fractures may be attributable to corticosteroid use among users of corticosteroids.

Objective: To characterise women with no response or with a good response to hormone replacement therapy (HRT), evaluated by change in bone mineral density (BMD)., Design: Nested case-control study within a comprehensive cohort study., Subjects and Methods: In the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study (DOPS), perimenopausal women were allocated to either HRT or no HRT. In the present study, we included 466 women who had been treated with HRT for 5 years and 466 untreated women from the same cohort. Non-responders were women in the treatment group, who decreased in BMD more than the mean decrease observed in the untreated group. Good responders were women with a larger increase in BMD than the upper 95% percentile of untreated women. Baseline characteristics were evaluated as predictors of response to HRT., Results: 8.4 and 5.6% were classified as non-responders, whereas 25 and 57% were good responders according to changes in BMD of the femoral neck and lumbar spine, respectively. Combining measuring sites, 2.6% were non-responders and 20% were good responders. Non-responders at the femoral neck were more often smokers and had a lower spine BMD. Good responders were older, had a higher body weight, and higher alcohol consumption. In addition, good responders at both measurements sites had a lower BMD at the total hip., Conclusion: A favourable BMD response to HRT can be expected in most post-menopausal women especially if they are non-smokers with a moderate--as opposed to low--alcohol intake, a high body mass and a low initial hip BMD.

Objective: To examine the association between cumulative CS dose and risk of hip fracture., Design: Population-based case-control design., Subjects and Methods: A total of 6660 subjects with hip fracture and 33,272 age-matched population controls were identified using the County Hospital Discharge Registry in North Jutland County, Denmark and the Danish Central Personal Registry, respectively. Data on redeemed prescriptions for CS within the last 5 years before the index date were retrieved from a population-based prescription database, and recalculated to prednisolone equivalents. Cases and controls were categorized according to cumulative CS dose: (i) no use; (ii) <130 mg (e.g. equivalent to 30 mg of prednisolone for 4 days given for an acute exacerbation of asthma); (iii) 130-499 mg (e.g. equivalent to a short course of prednisolone of 450 mg for acute asthma); (iv) 500-1499 mg (e.g. equivalent to 7.5 mg prednisolone daily for 6 months or 800 microg day(-1) of inhaled budesonide for 1 year); and (v) > or =1500 mg (e.g. equivalent to >4.1 mg day(-1) for 1 year, a long-term high dose). Data were analysed using conditional logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders including gender, redeemed prescriptions for hormone replacement therapy, antiosteoporotic, anxiolytic, antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs., Results: Compared with never users, an increased risk of hip fracture was found for CS users, with increasing cumulative doses of any type of CS use during the preceding 5 years [adjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.89-1.04] for <130 mg prednisolone; OR=1.17 (CI=1.01-1.35) for 130-499 mg; OR=1.36 (CI=1.19-1.56) for 500-1499 mg; and OR=1.65 (CI=1.43-1.92) for > or =1500 mg. An increased risk was also found when the study population was stratified according to gender, age and type of CS (systemic or topical)., Conclusions: Even a limited daily dose of CS (more than an average dose of approximately 71 microg prednisolone per day) was associated with an increased risk of hip fracture.