Search

Objective To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) without anterior support in treatment of Yang type A severe rigid thoracic kyphoscoliosis. Methods The records of 27 Yang type A severe thoracic kyphoscoliosis patients treated with PVCR without anterior support from January 2010 to September 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. Intraoperative multimodal neurophysiological monitoring was conducted in all patients. The 6 modes were somatosensory evoked potential, motor evoked potential, descending neurogenic evoked potential, spinal cord evoked potential, and electromyography (both triggered and free run). Radiographic parameters and complications were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Results PVCR without anterior support was conducted successfully in all 27 patients. Intraoperative monitoring events occurred in 3 patients (3/27); of these, 1 patient (1/27) showed postoperative spinal cord injury, but completely recovered within 9 months after the operation (Frankel level E). The number and osteotomy space of vertebrae resection were mean 1.33 levels and 3.7 cm, respectively. All cases achieved good coronal and sagittal curve correction. No implant related complications occurred until the latest follow-up. The average follow-up was 40.1 months (range, 24–59 months). Conclusions In this study, we found that posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) without any anterior support with a mean 3.7 cm shortening of the spinal column is safe, if close and unyielding contact of end plates can be obtained. A comprehensive understanding of the technique and intensive intraoperative neuromonitoring is mandatory to perform these challenging and complex spine deformity correction procedures safely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The use of posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) has extended the treatment of severe spinal deformity. However, the practice guidelines for anterior column support in patients treated by PVCR remain ill defined. The objective of the present study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of severe thoracic spinal deformity treated by PVCR with and without anterior column support (ACS). Methods We performed a prospective study of 57 patients with severe thoracic deformity (classified as Yang's A type) treated by PVCR with or without anterior column support from January 2010 to April 2015. The patient characteristics, radiographic parameters, intraoperative data, and complications were analyzed to clarify these 2 clinical series. Results The sex, age, diagnosis, curve magnitude, and curve type were similar between the PVCR with ACS group (n = 21) and non-ACS group (n = 36) preoperatively. Evaluation of the radiographic parameters, intraoperative data, and complications found no statistically significant intergroup differences, except for the osteotomy distance (non-ACS group, 4.0 cm; ACS group, 5.3 cm; P < 0.001) and shortening distance of the osteotomy gap (non-ACS group, 4.0 cm; ACS group, 3.5 cm; P = 0.005). Conclusions The results of the present study have shown that PVCR without ACS seems to be a safe and effective technique for Yang's A type severe thoracic spinal deformity correction compared with PVCR with ACS. PVCR without ACS requires a relatively smaller osteotomy range and could potentially decrease the risk of implant failure due to bone to bone fusion. Highlights • Non-ACS group with 4.0-cm osteotomy gap shortening is safe and effective for Yang's type A severe thoracic spinal deformity. • The osteotomy range can be effectively decreased using the non-ACS technique compared with the ACS technique. • The non-ACS technique can potentially decrease the risk of implant failure owing to bone to bone fusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Difficult procedures of severe rigid spinal deformity increase the risk of intraoperative neurological injury. Here, we aimed to investigate the preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for postoperative neurological complications when treating severe rigid spinal deformity.Methods: One hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients who underwent severe rigid spinal deformity correction were assigned into 2 groups: the neurological complication (NC, 22 cases) group or non-NC group (155 cases). The baseline demographics, preoperative spinal cord functional classification, radiographic parameters (curve type, curve magnitude, and coronal/sagittal/total deformity angular ratio [C/S/T-DAR]), and surgical variables (correction rate, osteotomy type, location, shortening distance of the osteotomy gap, and anterior column support) were analyzed to determine the risk factors for postoperative neurological complications.Results: Fifty-eight patients (32.8%) had intraoperative evoked potentials (EP) events. Twenty-two cases (12.4%) developed postoperative neurological complications. Age and etiology were closely related to postoperative neurological complications. The spinal cord functional classification analysis showed a lower proportion of type A, and a higher proportion of type C in the NC group. The NC group had a larger preoperative scoliosis angle, kyphosis angle, S-DAR, T-DAR, and kyphosis correction rate than the non-NC group. The results showed that the NC group tended to undergo high-grade osteotomy. No significant differences were observed in shortening distance or anterior column support of the osteotomy area between the two groups.Conclusions: Postoperative neurological complications were closely related to preoperative age, etiology, severity of deformity, angulation rate, spinal cord function classification, intraoperative osteotomy site, osteotomy type, and kyphosis correction rate. Identification of these risk factors and relative development of surgical techniques will help to minimize neural injuries and manage postoperative neurological complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective study.Objectives: This study is to measure and analyze the changes of three-dimensional (3D) distances of spinal column and spinal canal at the three-column osteotomy sites and address their clinical and neurologic significance.Summary Of Background Data: Three-column osteotomies were developed to treat severe and stiff spine deformities with insufficient understanding on the safe limit of spine shortening and the relationship between the shortening distance of the spinal column and that of the spinal canal.Methods: Records of 52 continuous patients with severe and stiff scoliosis treated with three-column spine osteotomies at our institution from July 2013 to June 2015 were reviewed. The preoperative spinal cord function classification were type A in 31 cases, type B in 10 cases, and type C in 11 cases. The types of osteotomies carried out were extended pedicle subtraction osteotomy in nine patients and posterior vertebral column resection in 43 patients. Multimodality neuromonitoring strategies were adopted intraoperatively. 3D pre- and postoperative spine models were reconstructed from the computed tomography (CT) scans. The distances of convex and concave spinal column and the spinal canal shortening were measured and analyzed.Results: The spinal column shortening distance (SCSD) measured on the 3D models (27.8 mm) were statistically shorter than those measured intraoperatively (32.8 mm) (P < 0.05); however, they were strongly correlated statistically (r = 0.82). The central spinal canal shortening distance (CCSD) was significantly shorter than the convex SCSD (P < 0.05). The convex SCSD and CCSD were significantly shorter in cases with anterior column strut graft than in those with bone-on-bone fusion (P < 0.05).Conclusion: The shortening distance of the convex spinal column cannot represent that of the central spinal canal in patients with severe scoliosis. The spinal column shortening procedure in appropriately selected patient groups with bone-on-bone fusion is a viable option with the CCSD being significantly shorter than the convex SCSD.Level Of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]