Search

Balance between thrombosis and bleeding is now well recognized in patients treated for acute coronary syndrome, with impact on short- and long-term prognosis, including survival. Recent data suggest that patients who are resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest related to myocardial infarction are at an even higher risk of bleeding and thrombosis than those with uncomplicated acute coronary syndrome. Delayed enteral absorption of medication due to induced hypothermia and systemic inflammation increases thrombosis risk, whereas transfemoral access site, cardiopulmonary resuscitation manoeuvres and mechanical circulatory support devices increase bleeding risk. In addition, post-resuscitation syndrome and renal or hepatic impairment are potential risk factors for both bleeding and thrombotic complications. There are currently no randomized controlled trials comparing various P 2 Y 12 inhibitor and/or anticoagulation strategies in the setting of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and current practice is largely derived from management of patients with uncomplicated acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this review is therefore to describe the bleeding and thrombosis risk factors in this specific population, and to review recent data on antithrombotic drugs in this patient subset., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Coronary angiogram (CA) may be useful after resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but data regarding its benefit in patients with non-shockable initial rhythm without ST-segment elevation is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and survival in OHCA patients with non-shockable initial rhythm without ST-segment elevation and compare them to patients with shockable initial rhythm without ST-segment elevation., Methods: Retrospective single-centre study approved by the ethics committee of our institution, including adults successfully resuscitated from OHCA of presumed cardiac cause, undergoing routine CA on admission. Baseline characteristics, angiographic data including presence of ACS and survival were compared between patients with non-shockable and shockable initial rhythm focusing on patients without ST-segment elevation., Results: Among 517 patients included between 2002 and 2018, 311 had no ST-elevation, of whom 179 had non-shockable and 132 shockable initial rhythm. Compared with shockable initial rhythm patients without ST-elevation, non-shockable initial rhythm patients without ST-elevation had longer no-flow duration, 5 (1-10) versus 2 (0-8) min, p = 0.024, more frequent shock requiring vasopressors, 72% versus 47% p < 0.0001, a lower prevalence of ACS, 2 (1%), versus 29 (22%), p < 0.001 and higher mortality, 85% versus 39% (p < 0.0001). Among ACS patients, none survived in the non-shockable without ST-elevation group, while 20 (69%) survived in the shockable rhythm without ST-elevation group., Conclusions: Prevalence of ACS in patients without ST-segment elevation and non-shockable initial rhythm is extremely low, and survival extremely poor, therefore routine emergency CA does not seem beneficial in these patients., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) continues to be a major global cause of death, affecting approximately 67 to 170 per 100,000 inhabitants annually in Europe, with a persisting high rate of mortality of up to 90% in most countries. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents one of the most significant cause of cardiac arrest, and therefore invasive coronary angiography (CAG) with subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has emerged as a fundamental component in the management of OHCA patients. Recent evidence from large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) challenges the routine use of early CAG in the larger subgroup of patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Additionally, emerging data suggest that individuals resuscitated from OHCA related to ACS face an elevated risk of thrombotic and bleeding events. Thus, specific invasive coronary strategies and anti-thrombotic therapies tailored to this unique setting of OHCA need to be considered for optimal in-hospital management. We sought to provide an overview of the prevalence and complexity of coronary artery disease observed in this specific population, discuss the rationale and timing for CAG after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), summarize invasive coronary strategies, and examine recent findings on antithrombotic therapies in the setting of ACS complicated by OHCA. By synthesizing the existing knowledge, this review aims to contribute to the understanding and optimization of care for OHCA patients to improve outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]