Search

Vaccination with priming and expansion of tumour reacting T cells is an important therapeutic option to be used in combination with novel checkpoint inhibitors to increase the specificity of the T cell infiltrate and the efficacy of the treatment. In this phase I/II study, 14 high-risk disease-free ovarian (OC) and breast cancer (BC) patients after completion of standard therapies were vaccinated with MUC1, ErbB2 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) HLA-A2+-restricted peptides and Montanide. Patients were subjected to 6 doses of vaccine every two weeks and a recall dose after 3 months. ECOG grade 2 toxicity was observed at the injection site. Eight out of 14 patients showed specific CD8+ T cells to at least one antigen. None of 4 patients vaccinated for compassionate use showed a CD8 activation. An OC patient who suffered from a lymph nodal recurrence, showed specific anti-ErbB2 CD8+ T cells in the bulky aortic lymph nodes suggesting homing of the activated T cells. Results confirm that peptide vaccination strategy is feasible, safe and well tolerated. In particular OC patients appear to show a higher response rate compared to BC patients. Vaccination generates a long-lasting immune response, which is strongly enhanced by recall administrations. The clinical outcome of patients enrolled in the trial appears favourable, having registered no deceased patients with a minimum follow-up of 8 years. These promising data, in line with the results of similar studies, the high compliance of patients observed and the favourable toxicity profile, support future trials of peptide vaccination in clinically disease-free patients who have completed standard treatments.

Cancer stem cells have been isolated from several solid tumors including prostate, colon, liver, breast, and ovarian cancer. Stem cells isolated from nervous system and prostate express CD133 antigen, which is widely used to isolate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. The aims of this study were to investigate the expression of the CD133-1 and CD133-2 epitopes in primary ovarian tumors and to biologically characterize CD133(+) ovarian cancer cells, also according to clinicopathologic parameters. Tissue specimens were obtained at primary surgery from 41 ovarian carcinomas; eight normal ovaries and five benign ovarian tumors were also collected. Flow cytometry with monoclonal antibodies against CD133-1 and CD133-2 epitopes was employed. FACS (fluorescence activated cell sorting) analysis enabled the selection of CD133(+) cells, whose epithelial origin was confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis with monoclonal anti-cytokeratin 7. CD133(+) cells gave rise to a 4.7 +/- 0.9-fold larger number of colonies than that documented in CD133(-) population (P < 0.001). Moreover, CD133(+) cells showed an enhanced proliferative potential compared to CD133(-) cells. The percentages of CD133-1- and CD133-2-expressing cells were significantly lower in normal ovaries/benign tumors with respect to those in ovarian carcinoma. Both the percentages of CD133-1- and CD133-2-expressing cells were significantly lower in omental metastases than in primary ovarian cancer (P = 0.009 and 0.007 for CD133-1- and CD133-2-expressing cells, respectively). There seems not to be any difference in the distribution of the percentage of CD133-1- and CD133-2-expressing cells according to clinicopathologic parameters and response to primary chemotherapy. CD133-1 and CD133-2 may be useful in order to select and enrich the population of CD133(+) ovarian tumor cells, which are characterized by a higher clonogenic efficiency and proliferative potential.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical role of immunological recovery together with selected biological parameters on long-term survival in a series of ovarian cancer administered high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell and growth factor support., Experimental Design: Thirty-eight patients with stages IIIB-IV epithelial ovarian cancer were studied. Lymphocyte immunophenotyping for the identification of CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD3(-)/CD16(+)CD56(+) natural killer T cells and CD19 B cells was performed., Results: Twenty-three patients (60%) had a CD3(+) cell count <850 cells/ microl. Multivariate logistic regression showed that tumor grading (chi(2) = 6.6, P = 0.010) and type of growth factor (chi(2) = 4.1, P = 0.042) retained an independent role in predicting T-cell recovery above the value of 850 cells/ microl. The 3-year time to progression (TTP) rate was 86% (95% confidence intervals, 70, 102) in cases with high CD3(+) cell count with respect to a 3-year TTP of 23% (95% confidence intervals, 8, 38) in cases with low CD3(+) cell count (P = 0.0026). The absolute number of CD3(+) cells was shown to be inversely associated with risk of progression (chi(2) = 4.8; P = 0.028), as assessed by Cox univariate analysis using CD3(+) cell count as continuous covariate. In multivariate analysis only residual tumor and status of CD3(+) cell counts retained an independent association with shorter TTP. Similar results were obtained for overall survival., Conclusions: Long-term immune reconstitution and particularly the recovery of adequate counts of CD3(+), CD4(+), and CD8(+) T cells are independent markers of longer TTP and overall survival in ovarian cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell and growth factor support.

This study evaluated the effects of low-dose IL-2 plus G-CSF/EPO on post-PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) immune-hematopoietic reconstitution and NK activity in patients with breast (BrCa) and ovarian cancer (OvCa). To this end, two consecutive series of patients were prospectively assigned to distinct post-PBSCT cytokine regimens (from day +1 to day +12) which consisted of G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day) plus EPO (150 IU/kg/every other day) in 17 patients (13 BrCa and 4 OvCa) or G-CSF/EPO plus IL-2 (2 x 10(5) IU/m(2)/day) in 15 patients (10 BrCa and 5 OvCa). Hematopoietic recovery and post-transplantation clinical courses were comparable in G-CSF/EPO- and in G-CSF/EPO plus IL-2-treated patients, without significant side-effects attributable to IL-2 administration. In the early and late post-transplant period a significantly higher PMN count was observed in G-CSF/EPO plus IL-2-treated patients (P = 0.034 and P = 0.040 on day +20 and +100, respectively). No significant differences were found between the two groups of patients in the kinetics of most lymphocyte subsets except naive CD45RA(+) T cells which had a delayed recovery in G-CSF/EPO plus IL-2 patients (P = 0.021 on day +100). No significant difference was observed between NK activity in the two different groups, albeit a significantly higher NK count was observed in G-CSF/EPO plus IL-2 series on day +20 (P = 0.020). These results demonstrate that low-dose IL-2 can be safely administered in combination with G-CSF/EPO early after PBSCT and that it exerts favorable effects on post-PBSCT myeloid reconstitution, but not on immune recovery.

In recent years hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) have been the object of new research efforts and scientific advances. Therapeutic strategies have been set up using HSC for the treatment of solid tumors such as ovarian cancer. In this context different approaches have been proposed and clinically investigated. The "autologous" approach refers to the use of HSC as hematologic support to high-dose chemotherapy regimens, and to the use of HSC as an abundant source of dendritic cells for cancer vaccination protocols. Our institution has developed a long-term experience in high-dose chemotherapy with autologous HSC transplantation as first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, and in the use of cytokines both for the HSC collection and for the post-transplantation hematopoietic recovery. Moreover, the "allogeneic" approach with HSC consists of the allogeneic transplantation with both myeloablative/standard or nonmyeloablative/reduced conditioning regimens, which has been proposed as a new adoptive immunotherapeutic treatment for different nonhematologic malignancies. Perspectives in the use of HSC in oncology comprise the possibility of an HSC ex vivo expansion, the use of umbilical cord blood HSC, and the development of future HSC-based gene-therapy programs.

Background: Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation (PBPCT) combined with post-PBPCT administration of myelopoietic growth factors is a valid therapeutic intervention to rapidly restore hematopoiesis after the delivery of intensive, myeloablative cancer chemotherapy. On the other hand, the best growth factor regimen to potentiate PBPC-mediated immunohematopoietic recovery has yet to be determined., Study Design and Methods: In a randomized evaluation, the effects produced by post-PBPCT G-CSF and GM-CSF on myeloid/lymphoid recovery and transplant outcome in women with chemosensitive cancer were compared. Thirty-seven ovarian cancer patients and 34 breast cancer patients ranging in age from 24 to 60 years were treated with carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan (CEM) high-dose chemotherapy and then randomly assigned to receive G-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) or GM-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) until Day 13 after PBPCT. Patients were compared in regard to hematopoietic recovery, posttransplant clinical management, and immune recovery. Finally, clinical outcome was estimated as time to progression and overall survival., Results: Hematopoietic recovery and posttransplant clinical management were comparable in both the G-CSF and GM-CSF series. Conversely, significantly higher T-cell counts were observed in G-CSF-treated patients during the early and late posttransplant follow-up. Patients who received G-CSF showed a significantly longer median time to progression. A parallel analysis revealed that patients in whom a higher CD3+ count was recovered had a significantly longer overall survival and time to progression., Conclusion: The enhancement of post-PBPCT T-cell recovery observed in G-CSF-treated patients encourages the use of G-CSF to ameliorate immune recovery, which seems to play a role in post-PBPCT control of disease in cancer patients. GM-CSF might be administered to prolong immunosuppression after autologous PBPCT for autoimmune diseases or allogeneic PBPCT.

Background: The peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization capacity of EPO in association with either G-CSF or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF was compared in a randomized fashion after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy., Study Design and Methods: Forty patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in this randomized comparison of mobilizing capacity and myelopoietic effects of G-CSF + EPO and GM-/G-CSF + EPO following the first ETP chemotherapy treatment. After ETP chemotherapy (Day 1), 20 patients received G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 13 and 20 patients received GM-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 6 followed by G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 7 to Day 13. EPO (150 IU per kg) was given every other day from Day 2 to Day 13 to all patients in both arms of the study. Apheresis (two blood volumes) was performed during hematologic recovery., Results: The magnitude of CD34+ cell mobilization and the abrogation of patients' myelosuppression were comparable in both study arms; however, GM-/G-CSF + EPO patients had significantly higher CD34+ yields because of a higher CD34+ cell collection efficiency (57.5% for GM-/G-CSF + EPO and 46.3% for G-CSF + EPO patients; p = 0.0009). Identical doses of PBPCs mobilized by GM-/G-CSF + EPO and G-CSF + EPO drove comparable hematopoietic recovery after reinfusion in patients treated with identical high-dose chemotherapy., Conclusion: The sequential administration of GM-CSF and G-CSF in combination with EPO is feasible and improves the PBPC collection efficiency after platinum-based intensive polychemotherapy, associating high PBPC mobilization to high collection efficiency during apheresis.

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term impact of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) as consolidation in a large series (n = 55) of advanced chemosensitive ovarian cancer patients who were optimally cytoreduced at time of first surgery or at interval debulking surgery (IDS). HDC consisted of carboplatin (600 mg/m(2) days 1 and 2), etoposide (450 mg/m(2) days 1 and 2) and melphalan (50 mg/m(2), days 3 and 4). The primary endpoint of the study was the assessment of time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). In September 2000 the overall population had a median follow-up of 55 months (range 17--137) and a TTP of 35 months with a 5-year TTP rate of 35% (CI 95%: 21--49) whereas OS averaged 75 months with a 5-year OS of 59% (CI 95%: 45--73). In patients achieving optimal primary cytoreduction the median TTP was 44 months with a 5-year rate of 43% (CI 95%: 26--60). In the same series the 5-year OS rate was 62% (CI 95%: 45--79) (median OS = 75 months). In patients who were optimally cytoreduced at the time of IDS the median TTP was 25 months and the 5-year TTP rate was 22% (CI 95%: 3--41) and median OS was 46 months with a 5-year OS rate of 50% (CI 95%: 27--73). HDC with hematopoietic support could represent an effective approach for the treatment of advanced optimally cytoreduced ovarian cancer patients with chemosensitive disease. Patients who underwent IDS because of unresectable tumors at the time of first surgery had the greater survival benefit from HDC.

Purpose and Methods: The ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus erythropoietin (EPO) treatment was compared in a randomized fashion with that of G-CSF treatment alone in promoting hematologic recovery and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) mobilization in previously untreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent their first course of epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy during a phase II study of intensive outpatient ETP chemotherapy followed by high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan (CEM) late intensification with PBPC support., Results: Comparative analysis of hematologic recovery of 50 randomized patients, after ETP chemotherapy, showed that life-threatening neutropenia occurred in 88% of the patients treated with G-CSF alone, whereas it occurred in only 4% of patients treated with G-CSF + EPO. Significantly different WBC and polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) counts were observed in the two distinct arms on the day of WBC nadir (P <.0001 and P <.0001, respectively). Moreover, the addition of EPO to G-CSF increased PBPC mobilization and collection as compared with that in G-CSF-treated patients (P =.0009 and P =.0026, respectively), who required a significantly higher number of leukaphereses than G-CSF + EPO-treated patients (P =.0076) to obtain the planned minimum dose of PBPCs. Qualitative analysis by cloning assay of PBPCs collected in both arms revealed that G-CSF- and G-CSF + EPO-mobilized PBPCs have comparable in vitro functional properties., Conclusion: This randomized comparison revealed that EPO significantly increases most of the hematologic effect produced by G-CSF administration after chemotherapy. This biologic property of EPO translated in vivo into a global improvement of patients' hematologic status.

The plasma concentrations of erythropoietin (Ep), soluble transferrin receptors (sTfRs), iron, total iron binding capacity (TIBC) and ferritin were monitored in five leukaemia patients undergoing autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation (BMSCT) and in 10 lymphoma and 21 ovarian cancer patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood SCT (PBSCT); 9/21 ovarian cancer patients received recombinant human G-CSF and Ep and six recombinant human GM-CSF and Ep following SCT. All parameters were evaluated in relation to the kinetics of erythroid reconstitution as evaluated by haemoglobin (Hb) and reticulocyte levels [including the fraction of immature reticulocytes, also called highly fluorescent reticulocytes (HFR)]. Leukaemia patients undergoing BMSCT showed only a delayed (occurring at days 35-50 after SCT) and partial RBC, neutrophil and platelet recovery, whereas all patients undergoing PBSCT exhibited a rapid (occurring at days 10-15 after SCT) and sustained haemopoietic recovery. The various levels of erythroid rescue observed among these patients markedly influenced the kinetics of the different parameters investigated: (i) in leukaemia BMSCT patients sTfRs declined following SCT and remained at low levels thereafter, whereas Ep, iron. TIBC and ferritin showed a progressive and significant increase; (ii) in the different groups of patients undergoing PBSCT: (a) sTfR levels first declined following SCT and then returned to pre-therapy values at days 12-16, this response preceded erythropoietic recovery; (b) Ep, total iron, TIBC and ferritin showed an initial increase in the first days following SCT and then returned to pre-therapy values. Altogether, these observations indicate that: (i) both sTfR levels and reticulocyte counts are predictive parameters of erythropoietic recovery; (ii) coordinated changes of biochemical parameters underlying iron metabolism (iron, TIBC and ferritin) accompany erythroid rescue following SCT.

The present report describes the non-haematological toxicity and the influence of growth factor administration on haematological toxicity and haematopoietic recovery observed after high-dose carboplatin (1200 mg m(-2)), etoposide (900 mg m(-2)) and melphalan (100 mg m(-2)) (CEM) followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) in 40 patients with high-risk cancer during their first-line treatment. PBPCs were collected during the previous outpatient induction chemotherapy programme by leukaphereses. CEM administration with PBPCT was associated with low non-haematological toxicity and the only significant toxicity consisted of a reversible grade III/IV increase in liver enzymes in 32% of the patients. Haematopoietic recovery was very fast in all patients and the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus erythropoietin (EPO) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) plus EPO after PBPCT significantly reduced haematological toxicity, abrogated antibiotic administration during neutropenia and significantly reduced hospital stay and patient's hospital charge compared with patients treated with PBPCT only. None of the patients died early of CEM plus PBPCT-related complications. Low non-haematological toxicity and accelerated haematopoietic recovery renders CEM with PBPC/growth factor support an acceptable therapeutic approach in an adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting.

Circulating CD34+ cells were isolated from leukapheresis products collected from patients with ovarian cancer. CD34 contaminating cells, identified immediately after immunoselection, ranged from 5% to 25% in five different experiments and were predominantly CD3+ T-lymphocytes (range 2-12%), CD3+/CD16+/CD56+ natural killer cells (range 2-11%) and rare mature CD15+/ CD11b+ granulocytes (range 1-2%). CD34+ cells were cultured in liquid medium in the presence of interleukin-3, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor. stem cell factor, granulocyte colony stimulating factor and a powerful proliferation with prevalent differentiation along the granulocytic/monocytic lineage was obtained. After 10 d of culture a small but consistent number of early multinucleated osteoclasts were identified with a frequency of one cell per 700 granulocytic/monocytic cells, as revealed by cytologic examination. This observation was confirmed by staining for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity which revealed red multinucleated elements with a frequency comparable to that reported above. Conversely, no osteoclasts were observed in those cultures in which macrophage overgrowth was obtained by culturing CD34+ cells until day 35. These observations suggest that circulating progenitors have a multilineage potential in vitro and contribute to the clarification of osteoclast development in humans: additionally, they provide the basis for the future development of optimized osteoclast culture techniques in liquid medium and the basic culture system, to test the distinct activity of 1,25(OH)2D3. parathyroid hormone interleukin-11 and of other cytokines on osteoclast development in humans.

In order to investigate the effects of erythropoietin (EPO) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration after peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) we performed a phase I/II study in patients with high-risk cancer. 15 consecutive patients were treated wit recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF) at the dose of 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (s.c.) every 24 h until day + 12 and with recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) at the dose of 150 IU/kg s.c. every 48 h until day + 11 following PBPCT. Their haemopoietic recovery was compared to that obtained in eight historic and control patients who did not receive any cytokines after PBPCT. No side-effects were observed during EPO plus G-CSF treatment and the treatment was not discontinued in any of the patients before completion of the treatment plan. The administration of EPO plus G-CSF after PBPCT produced a significant increase in the rate of white blood cell (WBC) (P = 0.0005), polymorphonuclear leucocyte (PMN) (P = 0.0005) and platelet (PLT) (P = 0.0105) recovery compared to the control group. The acceleration in haemopoietic recovery observed in the EPO plus G-CSF-treated patients produced a significant reduction of the days with WBC < 1 x 10(9)/l (P = 0.0009), PMN < 0.2 x 10(9)/l (P = 0.0030) and PMN < 0.5 x 10(9)/l (P = 0.0006). EPO plus G-CSF-treated patients required a significantly lower number of single donor PLT transfusions (P = 0.0142) and did not experience neutropenic fever, but historic control patients experienced fever > 38 degrees C for a median period of 4 d (0-12) with a medial period of parenteral antibiotic administration of 7.5 d (0-17). The length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter in the study group than in the historic control group (P = 0.0264). In conclusion, we can confirm that EPO plus G-CSF treatment is feasible and potentiates the haemopoietic recovery after PBPCT, thus simplifying the clinical management of cancer patients who undergo high-dose chemotherapy.

20 patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer were submitted to induction chemotherapy (ICT) (40 mg/m2 cisplatin, days 1-4; 1.5 g/m2 cyclophosphamide, day 4; every 4 weeks for 2 cycles) followed by intensified CT (100 mg/m2 cisplatin, day 1; 650 mg/m2 etoposide, day 2; 1.8 g/m2 carboplatin by 24 h infusion, day 3). Haematological support consisted of autologous peripheral stem cells (APSC) and bone marrow (ABM) transplant (T) in 16 and 4 patients, respectively. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 19 for pathological response (PR), one patient dying of systemic mycosis after ABMT. Severe (grade 3-4) non-haematological toxic effects were gastrointestinal (100%), neurological (10%) and hepatic (10%). PR was observed in 84% of patients (complete response 37%, partial response with microscopic residual disease 26%, partial response with macroscopic residual disease 21%). Five year overall survival was 60% and progression-free survival was 51% with 9 patients still disease-free (DFS). APSCT significantly reduced the duration of aplasia compared with ABMT, and toxicity was acceptable in those patients undergoing APSCT. The prolonged DFS in patients showing PCR suggests that this new approach may have a therapeutic impact.

The bisdioxopiperazine ICRF 187 is a potent intracellular chelating agent which effectively diminishes Adriamycin cardiotoxicity without compromising its antitumor activity. Our study aimed at verifying whether ICRF 187 can modulate the cytotoxic action of cisplatin (CDDP) on ovarian cancer cells. We used the A2780 ovarian cancer cell line and a subline resistant to CDDP (A2780-CDDP) obtained in our laboratory by continuous exposure of the parenatal cells to progressively increasing CDDP doses. In both cell lines ICRF 187 (0.1-0.5 microgram/ml) used in combination with CDDP (0.01-1 microgram/ml) produced a dose-dependent reduction of CDDP IC50 (the concentration inhibiting 50% of cell growth). Moreover, when ICRF 187 was used in combination with CDDP, analysis of the data by the isobole method showed that the combination of the two drugs produced a synergistic antiproliferative activity in both cell lines, with a CDDP potentiation up to fivefold. Our in vitro data show that ICRF 187 can synergize with CDDP. Prospective clinical trials are now needed to verify whether the addition of ICRF 187 to CDDP-containing regimens will result in an improved clinical response in ovarian cancer.

Twenty patients with advanced (stage III-IV), previously untreated ovarian carcinoma were treated by: (a) induction chemotherapy (40 mg/m2 cisplatin, days 1-4; 1.5 g/m2 cyclophosphamide, day 4; every 4 weeks for two cycles) followed by (b) intensification chemotherapy (100 mg/m2 cisplatin, day 1; 650 mg/m2 etoposide, day 2; 1.8 g/m2 carboplatin, day 3). Eligibility criteria further included: age less than 55 years, moderately good to poor tumour grade, macroscopic (> 0.5 cm) residual tumour. Autologous peripheral stem cells were recruited after the induction cycles and, to ensure haematological support, autologous bone marrow harvesting was routinely performed in the first 14 cases. Haematological support consisted of autologous peripheral stem cells and autologous bone marrow transplant in 16 and four patients, respectively. All patients are evaluable for toxicity and 19 for pathological response, one being dead of systemic mycosis 35 days after the autologous bone marrow transplant. Severe extra-haematological toxicities were the following: gastrointestinal (100%), neurological (10%), hepatic (10%). Pathological response was detected in 84% of cases (CR 37%, microscopic PR 26%, macroscopic PR 21%). Median follow-up times of 48 and 41 months have been reached respectively from enrolment and second-look. Four-year 62% overall and 57% progression-free survivals have been reached. Ten patients are still alive with NED (six of seven with CR, three of five with microscopic PR, and one of four with macroscopic PR). Autologous peripheral stem cell transplant significantly reduced the duration of aplasia compared with autologous bone marrow transplant, and toxicity was proved to be manageable in those patients undergoing autologous peripheral stem cell transplant. The prolonged disease-free survival in patients showing CR and microscopic PR suggests that further investigation on this new approach is worthwhile.

Six patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma (OvCa), and six patients with stage II or III resectable breast cancer (BrCa) were treated with low-dose CY (LD-CY, 1500 mg/m2) and cisplatin (CDDP) 100 mg/m2 (OvCa) or epirubicin (EPR) 120 mg/m2 (BrCa) plus recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF). Twelve days after chemotherapy, all patients underwent PBSC collection on an outpatient basis. Following the completion of the induction programme, all patients underwent high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with carboplatin 1200 mg/m2, etoposide 900 mg/m2 and melphalan 100 mg/m2 with the reinfusion of PBSC. LD-CY plus rhG-CSF in combination with CDDP or EPR mobilised a very large number of PBSC. After a median of 13 days from chemotherapy, the concentration of PBSC in the peripheral blood was 40-fold higher than the same patient's baseline value. Each collection yielded a median of 10.8 x 10(4)/kg colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage. Severe myelosuppression occurred in all patients following HDC, but the infusion of PBSC produced a rapid and sustained haemopoietic recovery. After a median of 11 days from reinfusion, haemopoietic engraftment was complete and 80% of the patients had platelets > 100 x 10(9)/l and PMN > 1 x 10(9)/l within 14 days after reinfusion. We can conclude that the present therapeutic approach is an excellent option for mobilisation, collection and transplantation of PBSC during intensive dose adjuvant polychemotherapy of high-risk cancer.

We have monitored the serum concentrations of hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs; ie, stem cell factor [SCF], leukemia inhibitory factor [LIF], interleukin-3 [IL-3], IL-6, IL-8, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]) in 15 lymphoma/leukemia and 6 ovarian cancer patients undergoing autologous bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) stem cell transplantation (SCT). Thus, the analysis was performed during and after high-dose chemotherapy (from day -6 to day -1), at the time of SCT (day 0), and thereafter (through day +17). Despite the heterogeneity of these patients and their conditioning regimens, a consistent kinetic pattern was observed for all analyzed cytokines. Particularly, (1) SCF serum concentration did not significantly fluctuate. (2) High levels of LIF (approximately 250 to 450 pg/mL) before chemotherapy rapidly declined to markedly lower concentrations (approximately 10 ng/mL) starting from day -1 through day +17; (3) conversely, IL-3 level was low before treatment, sharply increased during chemotherapy, and rapidly returned to base-line level after SCT. Hypothetically, the sharp LIF decrease and IL-3 increase during chemotherapy may underlie the induction of stem cell cycling and differentiation caused by hematopoietic ablation. Furthermore, (4) IL-6 concentration was low before and immediately after chemotherapy, but increased starting from day +5, peaked at day +6 through 9 and then declined to baseline level from day +10 onward; (5) a strictly similar pattern was consistently observed for both G-CSF and IL-8 levels, in agreement with our previous studies. It is relevant that peak IL-6, G-CSF, and IL-8 concentrations were directly correlated to peak neutrophil numbers in the recovery phase, thus suggesting an important role for these cytokines in granulocyte rescue; in line with this interpretation, hematologic patients undergoing PBSCT (10 of 15) exhibited higher peaks of IL-6, G-CSF, and IL-8 and a more pronounced increase of neutrophil/platelet number than did hematologic cases undergoing BMSCT (5 of 15). Altogether, these studies indicate a coordinate pattern of cytokine release during hematopoietic ablation/recovery after chemotherapy and autologous SCT, the fluctuations of LIF and IL-3 levels during chemotherapy are seemingly related to stem cell recruitment, whereas the post-SCT increase of IL-6, G-CSF, and IL-8 may underlie the neutrophil recovery.

We evaluated the immunological reconstitution of patients who underwent high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) for advanced ovarian cancer. Sixty days after transplantation a complete reconstitution of lymphocytes and of the CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, and CD16/56 subsets was observed in this series. A significant increase in the count of interleukin-2 receptor expressing lymphocyte (CD25) was found on day +60 after transplantation compared to that obtained at diagnosis and before transplantation. A significantly higher lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) precursor activity was seen on day +60 compared to the values obtained at diagnosis and before transplantation while natural killer activity did not show any significant variation. We conclude that ABSCT gives prompt and complete immunohaematopoietic reconstitution after high-dose treatment. Moreover, our data support the feasibility of interleukin-2/LAK therapy as consolidative therapy after ABSCT.

We investigated the feasibility of a programme of autologous blood stem cell (ABSC) harvesting and transplantation in 13 patients with advanced ovarian cancer, previously untreated by chemotherapy or radiotherapy and entering a phase II study of high-dose cisplatin, etoposide and carboplatin with haematopoietic stem cell rescue. Prior to high-dose treatment all patients underwent two courses of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide. An 8-fold increase of the peripheral colony forming unit granulocytic-macrophage (CFU-GM) was observed during recovery from myelosuppression after the first chemotherapy course. The second course determined a 2.5-fold increase of peripheral CFU-GM. In 70% of enrolled patients (nine patients) we were able to perform ABSC harvesting by leukaphereses; in the apheresed patients we harvested an average of 20.8 x 10(4)/kg CFU-GM (range 10.9-37.0). Haematopoietic trilineage engraftment, established as the number of days necessary to reach white blood cells (WBC) greater than 1.0 x 10(9)/l, polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMN) greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/l and platelets (PLT) greater than 50 x 10(9)/l, occurred very promptly and was sustained in the same series after high-dose cisplatin, carboplatin and etoposide, followed by autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). In our experience we found a significant correlation (r = 0.77; P less than 0.05) between CFU-GM infused dose and the engraftment speed of PMN. We conclude that the combination of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide is effective in mobilizing haematopoietic progenitors in the peripheral blood of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, previously untreated by chemoradiotherapy. Moreover, ABSCT is capable of rapidly restoring the haematopoietic function after high-dose treatment and for this reason it represents a particularly advisable therapeutic option for the treatment of solid tumours because these patients are commonly older than 50 and can be excluded from bone marrow transplantation.

Authors treated 4 patients suffering from advanced ovarian cancer with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell (APBSC) or autologous bone marrow stem cell (ABM) as hematopoietic support. In three patients were collected peripheral blood stem cells using a fully automated blood cell separator during hematopoietic recovery following aplasia induced by non-intensive chemotherapy (cisplatin 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1,500 mg/m2). Hemopoietic reconstitution of the four patients submitted to APBSC or ABM support after high-dose chemotherapy (cisplatin 100 mg/m2, VP16 650 mg/m2 and carboplatin 1,800 mg/m2) showed the low hematological toxicity of our treatment with APBSC support. Moreover, the drug combination of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide has clinical activity in ovarian cancer and it is an optimal association to mobilize and harvest large number of PBSC.