Search

Background: Most serous ovarian cancers are now understood to originate in the fallopian tubes. Removing the tubes (salpingectomy) likely reduces the risk of developing high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Numerous gynaecological societies now recommend prophylactic (or opportunistic) salpingectomy at the time of gynaecological surgery in appropriate women, and this is widely done. Salpingectomy at the time of non-gynaecological surgery has not been explored and may present an opportunity for primary prevention of ovarian cancer., Methods: This study investigated whether prophylactic salpingectomy with the intention of reducing the risk of developing ovarian cancer would be accepted and could be accomplished at the time of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Women aged at least 45 years scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were recruited. They were counselled and offered prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cholecystectomy. Outcome measures were rate of accomplishment of salpingectomy, time and procedural steps needed for salpingectomy, and complications., Results: A total of 105 patients were included in the study. The rate of acceptance of salpingectomy was approximately 60 per cent. Salpingectomy was performed in 98 of 105 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (93·3 per cent) and not accomplished because of poor visibility or adhesions in seven (6·7 per cent). Median additional operating time was 13 (range 4-45) min. There were no complications attributable to salpingectomy. One patient presented with ovarian cancer 28 months after prophylactic salpingectomy; histological re-evaluation of the tubes showed a previously undetected, focal serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma., Conclusion: Prophylactic salpingectomy can be done during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy., (© 2020 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.)

Objective: To determine how many FIGO (International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology) member societies have statements regarding opportunistic (incidental, prophylactic, risk-reducing) salpingectomy at the time of benign gynecologic surgery and to categorize statements as positive, negative or ambivalent., Study Design: The websites of the 130 FIGO member societies were searched for statements on opportunistic salpingectomy. We looked for separate statements and statements embedded in other documents such as clinical guidelines as well as statements by national societies of gynecologic oncology. If nothing was found on the websites we contacted societies by Email or fax., Results: As of early 2018, 13 FIGO member societies representing 14 countries have statements regarding opportunistic salpingectomy. Nine were separate, stand-alone statements, four were embedded in other documents. Nine of the 13 statements (from Canada, Finland, U.S.A., Great Britain, Australia and New Zealand, Denmark, Austria, Turkey, and Japan) support consideration of opportunistic salpingectomy in appropriate women and four (from Germany, Sweden, Norway, and France) are ambivalent; there are no statements recommending against opportunistic salpingectomy., Conclusion: In 2018 only a small minority of FIGO members have statements on opportunistic prophylactic salpingectomy. These statements are ambivalent or supportive, none is negative., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinomas primarily affect the peritoneal cavity, and they are typically diagnosed at an advanced tumor stage (Foley, Rauh-Hain, del Carmen in Oncology (Williston Park) 27:288-294, 2013). In the course of primary surgery, postoperative tumor residuals are, apart from the tumor stage, the strongest independent factors of prognosis (du Bois, Reuss, Pujade-Lauraine, Harter, Ray-Coquard, Pfisterer in Cancer 115:1234-1244, 2009). Due to improved surgical techniques, including the use of multi-visceral procedures, macroscopic tumor clearance can be achieved in oncological centers, in most cases (Harter, Muallem, Buhrmann et al in Gynecol Oncol 121:615-619, 2011). However, to date, it has not been shown that peritoneal carcinomatosis is, per se, an independent factor of prognosis or that it excludes the achievement of tumor clearance. Several studies have shown that a preceding drug therapy in peritoneal carcinomatosis could positively influence the overall prognosis (Trimbos, Trimbos, Vergote et al in J Natl Cancer Inst 95:105-112, 2003). In relapses of ovarian carcinoma, studies have shown that peritoneal carcinomatosis is a negative predictor of complete tumor resection; however, when it is possible to resect the tumor completely, peritoneal carcinomatosis does not play a role in the prognosis (Harter, Hahmann, Lueck et al in Ann Surg Oncol 16:1324-1330, 2009)., Results: PIPAC is a highly experimental method for treating patients with ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer. To date, only three studies have investigated a total of 184 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (Grass, Vuagniaux, Teixeira-Farinha, Lehmann, Demartines, Hubner in Br J Surg 104:669-678, 2017). Only some of those studies were phase I/II studies that included PIPAC for patients with different indications and different cancer entities. It is important to keep in mind that the PIPAC approach is associated with relatively high toxicity. To date, no systematic dose-finding studies have been reported. Moreover, no studies have reported improvements in progression-free or overall survival associated with PIPAC therapy., Conclusions: Randomized phase III studies are required to evaluate the effect of this therapy compared to other standard treatments (sequential or simultaneous applications with systemic chemotherapy). In cases of ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer, PIPAC should not be performed outside the framework of prospective, controlled studies.

Background: The role of systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer is unclear and has not been addressed by randomized studies. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to determine whether systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy improves progression-free and overall survival compared with resection of bulky nodes only., Methods: From January 1991 through May 2003, 427 eligible patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIB-C and IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma were randomly assigned to undergo systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n = 216) or resection of bulky nodes only (n = 211). Progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed using a log-rank statistic and a Cox multivariable regression analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided., Results: After a median follow-up of 68.4 months, 292 events (i.e., recurrences or deaths) were observed, and 202 patients had died. Sites of first recurrences were similar in both arms. The adjusted risk for first event was statistically significantly lower in the systematic lymphadenectomy arm (hazard ratio [HR] = .75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59 to 0.94; P = .01) than in the no-lymphadenectomy arm, corresponding to 5-year progression-free survival rates of 31.2 and 21.6% in the systematic lymphadenectomy and control arms, respectively (difference = 9.6%, 95% CI = 1.5% to 21.6%), and to median progression-free survival of 29.4 and 22.4 months, respectively (difference = 7 months, 95% CI = 1.0 to 14.4 months). The risk of death was similar in both arms (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.29; P = .85), corresponding to 5-year overall survival rates of 48.5 and 47%, respectively (difference = 1.5%, 95% CI = -8.4% to 10.6%), and to median overall survival of 58.7 and 56.3 months, respectively (difference = 2.4 months, 95% CI = -11.8 to 21.0 months). Median operating time was longer, and the percentage of patients requiring blood transfusions was higher in the systematic lymphadenectomy arm than in the no-lymphadenectomy arm (300 versus 210 minutes, P<.001, and 72% versus 59%; P = .006, respectively)., Conclusion: Systematic lymphadenectomy improves progression-free but not overall survival in women with optimally debulked advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Background: Ovarian cancer continues to be the leading cause of death due to gynecologic malignancies and most patients still present with advanced disease. In the present study we evaluated long-term survival and prognostic factors in patients with stage IV ovarian cancer., Patients and Methods: The charts of 62 consecutive women with FIGO stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer were reviewed., Results: Chemotherapy was the only factor associated with longer survival. Three patients (5%) survived for longer than 5 years. One died of disease at 6.3 years and two are alive without evidence of disease at 12.4 and 14.9 years, respectively., Conclusion: Survival seemed to correlate with the possibility of administering chemotherapy. Patients with verified stage IV ovarian cancer, in whom due to the initial tumor load, operative extent and concomitant illness, the possibility of postoperative chemotherapy administration seems questionable, might be considered for primary chemotherapy followed by surgery.

Objectives: The objectives were to assess indications for and outcome and morbidity of gastrointestinal surgery in patients with ovarian cancer., Methods: We reviewed 364 patients with ovarian cancer who underwent a total of 491 operations including a gastrointestinal procedure over a 10-year period. The 491 operations comprised 180 primary surgical procedures (37%), 44 second-look laparotomies (9%), and 267 procedures for recurrence or palliation (54%)., Results: Debulking of disease was the indication for bowel surgery for 87, 45, and 62% of cases in the three groups, respectively. Bowel obstruction was an indication in 14% of patients at primary surgery and in 34% at secondary surgery (P < 0.05). Rectosigmoid resection was the most common bowel operation overall, particularly in the primary surgery group (65%). Colostomy was performed in 30% of the cases of rectosigmoid resection at primary surgery. Small-bowel resection was most common in the surgery for recurrence or palliation group. The blood transfusion rate was 79%. Febrile morbidity was the most common complication overall (29%), with no significant differences among groups. Four patients (0.8%) required reoperation for an abscess or anastomotic leak. Nineteen operations (3.9%) were followed by death within 30 days, with no significant differences among groups. A weighted Cox model estimated that 21, 42, and 11% of patients would be alive 5 years after primary surgery, second-look laparotomy, and surgery for recurrence or palliation, respectively (P = 0.01)., Conclusion: Gastrointestinal surgery is frequently indicated during operations for ovarian cancer. Gynecologic cancer surgeons should be trained accordingly. Patients with possibly malignant ovarian masses should receive preoperative bowel preparation and be counseled that bowel surgery may be needed but colostomy is not frequently required., (Copyright 2001 Academic Press.)

Objective: Inguinal metastasis is a rare manifestation of ovarian cancer. Autopsy studies have reported inguinal metastasis in 0-3% of patients with advanced disease., Case Report: We describe a 43-year-old patient with ovarian cancer limited to the adnexa who had an isolated metastasis in an enlarged inguinal lymph node. The patient underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, omentectomy, pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy, and excision of the enlarged inguinal lymph node. All 78 pelvic and 40 paraaortic lymph nodes were negative., Conclusion: This case demonstrates that early isolated distant lymph node metastasis, although rare, can occur in patients with ovarian cancer and may be a presenting symptom., (Copyright 1999 Academic Press.)

Objective: Our experience with systematic lymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer (defined as intraabdominal disease confined to the ovaries) was reviewed. We analyzed whether it would be possible to predict lymph node metastases on the basis of clinical-morphologic factors at the time of surgery., Study Design: Forty of 100 evaluable patients operated on between 1980 and 1990 underwent comprehensive surgical staging, including total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and systemic pelvic +/- paraaortic lymphadenectomy., Results: Nine of the 40 (23%) patients who underwent lymphadenectomy were found to have lymph node metastases; five of these were < or = 2 mm in maximum diameter. Four of the nine patients with positive nodes had ovarian tumors with a maximum diameter of only 5 cm, eight had grade 2 or 3 tumors, and eight tumors were classified as serous cystadenocarcinomas. Other clinical-morphologic factors such as ascites, adherence, or extracystic excrescences did not predict lymph node metastasis. Four of the nine patients with positive nodes survived > or = 5 years with no evidence of disease., Conclusions: Lymph node metastases, some < r = 2 mm in diameter, occur in an appreciable percentage of patients with intraabdominal disease confined to the ovaries. Clinical-morphologic factors at surgery cannot be relied on to predict the status of the lymph nodes. Thus we cannot recommend limiting lymphadenectomy to any specific subgroup of patients with intraabdominal disease confined to the ovaries.

We review our experience with 82 patients with nongenital cancers metastatic to the ovary. All patients were referred for evaluation of an ovarian mass. The patients had primary carcinoma of the breast (n = 28), colon (n = 23), stomach (n = 22), pancreas (n = 7), or gallbladder (n = 2). The overall actuarial 5-year survival rate was 10%. Five-year survival in patients with metastatic colon cancer was significantly higher (23%) than that in patients with metastatic cancer of the breast, stomach, gallbladder, or pancreas, all of whom died within 58 months (P less than 0.05). Patients with unilateral metastatic ovarian involvement had a 5-year survival significantly better than that of those with bilateral involvement (28% vs 5%; p = 0.003). Five-year survival in patients with disease limited to the pelvis was significantly higher than that in those with abdominal spread (22% vs 6%; P less than 0.04). The 5-year survival of patients with residual disease less than 2 cm or greater than 2 cm in diameter was 18% or 4%, respectively (P = 0.002). This pattern applied mainly to differences in patients with primary cancer of the breast or colon (P less than 0.008). These data suggest that an aggressive surgical effort seems to be indicated in colon cancer metastatic to the ovary, as some of these patients may survive 5 years.

To study scalene lymph node involvement in ovarian cancer, 37 patients with this disease underwent pretherapeutic open sampling of the left scalene fat tissue. Only 1 patient had a palpable supraclavicular mass. Positive scalene nodes were found in 7 (22%) of 32 patients with stage III or IV disease. Three of four patients with positive scalene nodes also had both positive pelvic and positive paraaortic nodes; one patient with stage IV disease had negative pelvic and paraaortic nodes. Demonstration of scalene node involvement per se currently does not alter the management of patients with ovarian cancer, although patients with occult involvement of the scalene nodes could be considered ineligible for intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

One hundred eighty patients with ovarian cancer underwent complete pelvic lymphadenectomy (n = 75) or pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy (n = 105). Twenty-one patients underwent a preoperative biopsy of the scalene lymph nodes. The incidence of positive lymph nodes was 24% in stage I (n = 37), 50% in stage II (n = 14), 74% in stage III (n = 114), and 73% in stage IV (n = 15). Of the 105 patients who underwent pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy, 13 (12%) had positive pelvic and negative paraaortic nodes and 10 (9%) had positive paraaortic and negative pelvic nodes. Positive scalene nodes were found in four patients (19%) later shown to have stage IV disease. One hundred forty patients were studied for number of involved nodes and node groups, size of nodal metastases, residual tumor, and survival. Of the 81 patients with positive nodes, most had only one or two positive node groups or one to three positive individual nodes. A few patients had seven to eight involved node groups with up to 44 positive nodes. Greater numbers of positive nodes were found in stage III than stage IV. The size of the largest nodal metastasis was not related to the clinical stage or survival, but did correlate with the number of positive nodes. Stage III patients with no residual tumor had a significantly lower rate of lymph node involvement than those with tumor residual (P less than 0.01). Actuarial 5-year survival rates of patients with stage III disease and no, one, or more than one positive nodes were 69, 58, and 28%, respectively.

Tc-99m HMDP uptake by abdominal metastases of an ovarian cancer was seen on a bone image. The findings were confirmed by computed tomography and by biopsy at surgery. The psammoma bodies throughout the tumor tissue appeared to be the substrate of this unusual extraosseous tracer uptake.

Despite recent improvements, the survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer remains unsatisfactory. In our patients who underwent radical debulking surgery, including systematic pelvic (and, additionally, in about one-third, para-aortic lymphadenectomy), the size of residual tumour volume prior to cytotoxic chemotherapy was the most critical single prognostic determinant. The value of complete tumour removal was reflected in the survival curves. Patients with no residual disease following debulking surgery who underwent complete adjuvant chemotherapy showed a significantly better survival than did women with residual tumour burdens (P less than 0.05). The actuarial 1-year survival rate in patients with no RD, RD less than 2 cm, and RD greater than 2 cm was 96%, 88%, and 83%, the 3-year survival rate was 78%, 56%, and 37%, and the 5-year survival rate was 78%, 40%, and 21%, respectively. Our results agree with previous studies. The data underline the need for aggressive debulking, including systematic lymphadenectomy and subsequent chemotherapy. The smaller the initial cell population the smaller the probability of drug-induced resistance. The greater the diameter of a tumour the greater the number of cells which remain in the G0 phase--and which are thus not susceptible to chemotherapeutic compounds.

To determine the incidence and clinical import of lymphocysts after radical gynecologic surgery including lymphadenectomy, we reviewed the records of 173 patients with cervical cancer and 135 patients with ovarian cancer who were followed up by computed tomography. Lymphocysts were found in 35 (20%) and 43 (32%) of the patients, respectively. Patients with cervical cancer and positive lymph nodes had a significantly higher rate of lymphocyst formation than did those with negative nodes (29% versus 14%, respectively, p less than 0.02). Age, type of lymphadenectomy, volume of fluid furthered by postoperative drains, disease stage, and tumor histology were not related to lymphocyst development. We saw no complications strictly attributable to lymphocysts. The clinical import and treatment possibilities are discussed.

Thirty patients with tumors of the ovarian stroma (28 granulosa cell tumors, two androblastomas) and 12 women with germ-cell tumors (nine dysgerminomas, two teratomas, one endodermal sinus tumor) were treated at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University in Graz between 1972 and 1989. Of the 28 patients with granulosa-cell tumors, 24 (86%) had stage I disease, 27 were primarily treated by surgery, and seven (25%) developed a recurrence (three stage I, three stage III and one stage IV). There were three recurrences in the peritoneal cavity and two in the paraaortic nodes; six of the seven patients died of recurrent disease.Four of nine patients with stage I dysgerminomas developed recurrences, two of which were located in the para-aortic nodes. Three patients with recurrence after stage Ia disease are currently alive without evidence of disease; one patient with stage Ib disease died 11 months after a paraaortic recurrence.Wider use of cytostatic combinations and careful surgical staging, including lymphadenectomy, may improve the survival of patients with stromal or germ-cell tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]