Search

Objectives: To study the safety and feasibility of a restrictive temporary-RV-pacemaker use and to evaluate the need for temporary pacemaker insertion for failed left ventricular (LV) pacing ability (no ventricular capture) or occurrence of high-degree AV-blocks mandating continuous pacing., Background: Ventricular pacing remains an essential part of contemporary transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). A temporary-right-ventricle (RV)-pacemaker lead is the standard approach for transient pacing during TAVI but requires central venous access., Methods: An observational registry including 672 patients who underwent TAVI between June 2018 and December 2020. Patients received pacing on the wire when necessary, unless there was a high-anticipated risk for conduction disturbances post-TAVI, based on the baseline-ECG. The follow-up period was 30 days., Results: A temporary-RV-pacemaker lead (RVP-cohort) was inserted in 45 patients, pacing on the wire (LVP-cohort) in 488 patients, and no pacing (NoP-cohort) in 139 patients. A bailout temporary pacemaker was implanted in 14 patients (10.1%) in the NoP-cohort and in 24 patients (4.9%) in the LVP-cohort. One patient in the LVP-cohort needed an RV-pacemaker for incomplete ventricular capture. Procedure time was significantly longer in the RVP-cohort (68 min [IQR 52-88.] vs. 55 min [IQR 44-72] in NoP-cohort and 55 min [IQR 43-71] in the LVP-cohort [p < 0.005]). Procedural high-degree AV-block occurred most often in the RVP-cohort (45% vs. 14% in the LVP and 16% in the NoP-cohort [p ≤ 0.001]). Need for new PPI occurred in 47% in the RVP-cohort, versus 20% in the NoP-cohort and 11% in the LVP-cohort (p ≤ 0.001)., Conclusion: A restricted RV-pacemaker strategy is safe and shortens procedure time. The majority of TAVI-procedures do not require a temporary-RV-pacemaker., (© 2021 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background The need for new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) remains a critical issue. Membranous Septum (MS) length is associated with PPI after TAVI. The aim of this study was to identify different MS thresholds for the contemporary THV-platforms. Methods This retrospective, case-control study enrolled all patients who underwent a successful TAVI procedure with contemporary THV-platforms in the Erasmus University Medical Center between January 2016 and March 2020. The follow-up period for new PPI was 30 days. MS-length was determined by Computed Tomography. Results The study consisted 653 TAVI patients with median age 80.6 years (IQR 74.7-84.8). New PPI occurred in 120 patients (18.4%). Patients with new PPI had a shorter MS-length (2.9 mm (IQR 2.3-4.3) vs. 4.2 mm (IQR 2.9-5.7), p < 0.001). MS-length < 3 mm identified a high-risk phenotype with 30.3% PPI-rate (OR 6.5 [95%CI 2.9-14.9]), MS-length 3-6 mm an intermediate-risk phenotype with 15.4% PPI-rate (OR 2.7 [95%CI 1.2-6.2]) and MS > 6 mm a low-risk phenotype with a 6.3% PPI-rate (reference). For the Lotus valve, there was no significant difference in PPI-rates between the high-risk (45.8%, OR 3.5 [95%CI 0.8-15.1]) and low-risk group (20%). By multivariate analysis MS-length, Agatston-score, use of Lotus valve, and ECG with first-degree AV block, RBBB or bifascular block were independent predictors for new PPI. Conclusion MS-length was an independent predictor for new PPI post-TAVI. Three phenotypes were found based on MS-length. MS < 3 mm was universally associated with a high risk for new PPI (>30%). MS > 6 mm represented a low-risk phenotype with PPI-rate < 10%. PPI-rate varied per THV type in the intermediate phenotype. PPI-rate with Lotus was high regardless of MS-length., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)