Search

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Screening for pancreatic cancer is recommended for individuals with a strong family history, certain genetic syndromes, or a neoplastic cyst of the pancreas. However, limited data supports a survival benefit attributable to screening these higher-risk individuals., Methods: All patients enrolled in screening at a High-Risk Pancreatic Cancer Clinic (HRC) from July 2013 to June 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database and compared to patients evaluated at a Surgical Oncology Clinic (SOC) at the same institution during the same period. Clinical outcomes of patients selected for surgical resection, particularly clinicopathologic stage and overall survival, were compared., Results: Among 826 HRC patients followed for a median (IQR) of 2.3 (0.8-4.2) years, 128 were selected for surgical resection and compared to 402 SOC patients selected for resection. Overall survival was significantly longer among HRC patients (median survival: not reached vs. 2.6 years, p < 0.001). Among 31 HRC and 217 SOC patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the majority of HRC patients were diagnosed with stage 0 disease (carcinoma in situ), while the majority of SOC patients were diagnosed with stage II disease (p < 0.001). Overall survival after resection of invasive PDAC was also significantly longer among HRC patients compared to SOC patients (median survival 5.5 vs. 1.6 years, p = 0.002)., Conclusion: Patients at increased risk for PDAC and followed with guideline-based screening exhibited downstaging of disease and improved survival from PDAC in comparison to patients who were not screened., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Surgical Oncology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: Patients with benign neoplasms of the pancreas are selected for pancreaticoduodenectomy if there is concern for malignant transformation. This study compares outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with premalignant and malignant pancreatic neoplasms., Study Design: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for histologically confirmed benign/premalignant pancreatic neoplasms and primary pancreatic malignancy reported to National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) from 2005 to 2011. Patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared., Results: A total of 6085 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy: 744 (12.2 %) for benign/premalignant and 5341 (87.8 %) for malignant pancreatic neoplasms. Patients with benign/premalignant neoplasms were more commonly female, had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and were less likely to have major comorbidities (all p ≤ 0.003). After resection, patients with benign/premalignant neoplasms were more likely to develop organ space infection (13.4 vs. 8.5 %, p < 0.001) and sepsis (12.2 vs. 9.2 %, p = 0.009). Cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, and other organ system complications (p = 0.12) as well as 30-day mortality (3.0 vs. 2.0 %, p = 0.128) did not differ., Conclusions: Organ space infection and sepsis are more common after pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign/premalignant neoplasms. Planned improvements in NSQIP data capture should allow for better measurement of this morbidity. A carefully balanced risk and benefit discussion should precede resection in these patients.

Background: High-quality preoperative cross-sectional imaging is vital to accurately stage patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We hypothesized that imaging performed at a high-volume pancreatic cancer center with pancreatic imaging protocols more accurately stages patients compared with pre-referral imaging., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from all patients with PDAC who presented to the surgical oncology clinic at our institution between June 2005 and August 2009. Detailed preoperative imaging, staging, and operative data were collected for each patient., Results: A total of 230 patients with PDAC were identified, of which 169 had pre-referral imaging. Patients were selectively reimaged at our institution based on the quality and timing of imaging at the outside facility: 108 (47%) patients were deemed resectable, 54 (23.5%) were deemed borderline-resectable, and 68 (29.5%) were deemed unresectable. Of the resectable patients, 99 opted for resection. Eighty-two of those 99 patients underwent preoperative imaging at our institution, and of these 27% had unresectable disease at the time of surgery compared with 47% of patients who only had pre-referral imaging (p = 0.14). Reimaging altered staging and changed management in 56% of patients. Among that group were 55 patients, categorized as resectable on pre-referral imaging, who on repeat imaging were deemed to be borderline resectable (n = 27) or unresectable (n = 28)., Conclusions: Pancreas-protocol imaging at a high-volume center improves preoperative staging and alters management in a significant proportion of patients with PDAC who undergo pre-referral imaging. Thus, repeat imaging with pancreas protocols and dedicated radiologists is justified at high-volume centers.

Background: Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) represent a high-risk group of patients due to tumor or patient-related characteristics. The optimal management of these patients has not been fully defined., Materials and Methods: All patients undergoing evaluation for PDA between 2005 and 2008 were identified. Clinical, radiographic, and pathological data were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were staged as borderline resectable using the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) classification., Results: A total of 170 patients with PDA were identified, 40 with borderline resectable disease. Of these, 34 borderline resectable patients (85%) completed neoadjuvant therapy and were restaged; pancreatic resection was completed in 16 patients (46%). Also, 8 patients completed 50 Gy of radiation in 28 fractions in 6 weeks, whereas 8 patients received 50 Gy in 20 fractions in 4 weeks plus chronomodulated capecitabine. An R0 resection was achieved in 12 of the 16 patients (75%). Also, 5 patients (63%) treated in 20 fractions had >90% pathologic response versus 1 (13%) treated in 28 fractions (P < .05). Borderline resectable patients completing surgery had similar survival to patients with resectable disease who underwent surgery. Patients receiving accelerated fractionation radiation had improved survival compared with patients treated with standard fractionation protocol., Conclusions: A neoadjuvant approach to borderline resectable PDA identifies patients who are most likely to benefit from pancreatic resection. Preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for these patients. Neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable PDA warrants further investigation using treatment schedules that can safely intensify irradiation dose.

Background: The diagnosis and treatment of gastric and pancreatoduodenal neoplasms after previous gastric bypass has been limited. Experience should increase in the future owing to the number of bariatric procedures being performed. The diagnosis and resection of these neoplasms and restoration of biliopancreatic intestinal continuity pose challenges. We present a 2-institutional experience of diagnosis and reconstruction after resection of gastric and pancreatoduodenal neoplasms and discuss the technical options for reconstruction., Methods: The medical records were reviewed retrospectively from 2003 to 2009 for patients with previous gastric bypass who developed a gastric or pancreatoduodenal neoplasm., Results: Of the available patients, 7 were identified with 2 remnant gastric cancers (2 signet ring cell adenocarcinomas), 4 pancreatic neoplasms (2 adenocarcinomas and 2 neuroendocrine cancers), and 1 ampullary cancer. The gastric neoplasms required complete remnant gastrectomy but did not require additional gastrointestinal reconstruction. The pancreatic and duodenal neoplasms required pancreatoduodenectomy, with 4 of 5 patients also undergoing remnant gastrectomy. The patients after pancreatoduodenectomy required biliary and pancreatic reconstruction with the pancreaticobiliary limb, Roux limb, or proximal common channel, depending on the limb length. Operative mortality was nil, and the morbidity rate was 28%., Conclusion: Gastric and pancreatoduodenal neoplasms after previous gastric bypass, although rare, will most likely increase as the number of bariatric operations increases. A high index of suspicion and focused diagnostic testing are key in identifying these lesions. Resection is feasible and safe but could require complex gastric and pancreatobiliary reconstruction., (Copyright © 2010 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cytology frequently has some role in preoperatively distinguishing pancreatic mucus-producing neoplasia (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms [IPMNs] and mucinous cystic neoplasms [MCNs]) from other pancreatic cysts. We evaluated all cytologic specimens at our institutions from resected pancreatic cystic lesions for lesional extracellular and cellular material. Lesional extracellular material was identified in 32 of 38 of the cytologic samples from cystic pancreatic mucus-producing neoplasms (28 of 31 IPMNs and 4 of 7 MCNs). Lesional cellular material was seen in 22 of 38 cases (17 of 31 IPMNs and 5 of 7 MCNs). Lesional material was more commonly identified in higher grade and invasive lesions. Lesional extracellular material was seen in 3 of 14 samples of other pancreatic cysts, and lesional cellular material was seen in 6 of 14 cases.

Objectives: Characterization of pancreatic cysts using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration includes cytological interpretation and chemical analysis. We prospectively analyzed the contribution of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytological identification of extracellular mucin as predictors of mucinous neoplasia and malignancy., Methods: From January 2003 to October 2005, all patients referred to the University of Virginia with cystic lesions of the pancreas underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with cytological evaluation and CEA level analysis. Data were collected prospectively and confirmed by resection or tissue biopsy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the following variables with regard to their ability to predict mucinous neoplasia: age (<55 or >55 years), sex, CEA level (<300 or >300 ng/mL), and cytological appreciation of extracellular mucin (positive or negative). P values less than 0.05 were considered significant., Results: A total of 43 patients were included in this study. There were 19 men and 24 women with a mean age of 63 +/- 14 years. The only complication was pancreatitis secondary to cyst leak in one patient. Multivariate analysis confirmed CEA level greater than 300 ng/mL (P= 0.007) and the identification of mucin (P < 0.001) as significant predictors., Conclusions: With pancreatic cyst fluid analysis, the strongest predictor of mucinous neoplasia is the presence of identifiable mucin, followed by a CEA level greater than 300 ng/mL. The workup of cystic lesions of the pancreas should include chemical analysis for the CEA level and cytological examination with particular attention to extracellular mucin.

Background: Lymphoepithelial cysts (LECs) of the pancreas are extremely rare, benign, nonneoplastic cysts that can mimic pseudocysts or cystic neoplasms clinically and radiographically. The cytologic features of LECs have been described only in a handful of case reports and may overlap with both benign and malignant pancreatic tumors., Methods: The authors conducted a 5-year, retrospective, computerized review of the cytopathology files of 2 institutions for all diagnoses of pancreatic LECs. Clinical, radiographic, cytologic, and chemical findings were reviewed., Results: Four patients were identified. The study group consisted of 3 men and 1 woman who ranged in age from 33 years to 63 years. The masses were located throughout the pancreas. Tumor sizes ranged from 1.8 cm to 5.7 cm in greatest dimension. Smears from all patients revealed numerous anucleated squamous cells, rare benign nucleated cells, amorphous debris, and an absence of lymphocytes. Mildly atypical mucinous glandular and parakeratotic epithelium were identified in 2 patients, leading to diagnoses of atypical and suspicious for malignancy. Subsequent surgical follow-up of 3 patients revealed pancreatic LECs., Conclusions: Pancreatic LECs are extremely rare, and certain cytologic pitfalls may hinder a correct prospective diagnosis. Familiarity with the lesion's clinical and cytologic features may help clinicians arrive at the appropriate prospective diagnosis and, thus, permit conservative management. Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is thought to develop through a series of genetic events through its purported precursor lesion, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN). Little, however, is known regarding the role of possible precursor lesions in the development of other primary neoplasms of the pancreas. This study investigated the prevalence of PanIN, as defined by recent consensus statements, in pancreata with uncommon types of primary neoplasms. All pancreata resected at the University of Virginia from June 1, 1991 to March 1, 2005 for neoplasia not diagnosed as conventional ductal adenocarcinoma were reviewed and classified according to the World Health Organization's classification schema for tumors of the exocrine and endocrine pancreas. All slides from these cases were then assessed for PanIN, which was classified according to the criteria of the most recent consensus statement. Three acinar cell carcinomas (ACCs), 18 mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), 24 pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs), 12 serous cystadenomas (SCs), and 3 solid-pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) were identified. PanIN was identified in the pancreata of 3 of 3 ACCs, 17 of 18 MCNs, 16 of 24 PETs, 10 of 12 SCs, and 2 of 3 SPTs. The degree of PanIN was noted to trend with patient age. Although the high prevalence of PanIN in pancreata concomitantly harboring certain uncommon neoplasms of the pancreas could signify its role as a precursor lesion for those neoplasms, its high prevalence throughout our series may simply be the result of a coincidental, prevalent finding seen in all pancreata, especially with aging. Because of the ubiquitous nature of PanIN, it should not be used histologically to assist in the diagnosis and subclassification of pancreatic neoplasia.

The majority of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer present at an advanced stage, and only a small percentage are considered technically resectable at diagnosis. The overall prognosis for the majority is dismal, with a median survival in untreated cases of only 24 weeks. Even in resected patients the overall 5-year survival rate is generally only 5% to 10%; however, some reports indicate higher 5-year survival rates in patients treated with surgery who are pathologically staged with no lymph node involvement. Even when macroscopically complete resection is achieved, local recurrence (LR) rates are unacceptably high (30% to 70%), which is usually attributed to the difficulty of obtaining microscopically free surgical margins. Microscopic clearance is difficult to achieve because these tumors frequently extend into the peripancreatic tissues (e.g., retropancreatic fat), abut or invade the adjacent large vessels (the portal vein and superior mesenteric artery), and have a propensity to invade the lymphovascular and perineural space. Other common sites of failure after attempted curative resection include metastasis to the liver and the peritoneal cavity. Patients who present with pancreatic cancer, and for whom curative surgery is deemed possible, are thus potential candidates for adjuvant therapy because of the high local failure rate following resection alone. The radiotherapy dose that can be achieved in the postoperative setting for pancreatic cancer is limited because of the proximity of critical structures (e.g., the kidney, liver, small intestines, stomach, and spinal cord). Newer techniques such as conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy have the advantage of being able (theoretically) to precisely localize the dose to the target volume while reducing the dose to critical structures. These techniques may potentially enable the tumorcidal dose to be increased; however, they are only now becoming widespread. Systemic radiation-sensitizing chemotherapy is also a promising approach to take advantage of additive or synergistic effects with radiation locally, and for the sterilization of systemic disease. This concept of concomitant chemotherapy with radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy, has proved effective in a number of sites, including the anal canal, rectum, lung, and pancreas. The recent trials reviewed here varied considerably in terms of the total dose and technique used, and the choice of radiation sensitizing treatment., (Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)