Search

The tumor microenvironment (TME) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) involves a significant accumulation of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) as part of the host response to tumor cells. The origins and functions of transcriptionally diverse CAF populations in PDAC remain poorly understood. Tumor cell-intrinsic genetic mutations and epigenetic dysregulation may reshape the TME; however, their impacts on CAF heterogeneity remain elusive. SETD2, a histone H3K36 trimethyl-transferase, functions as a tumor suppressor. Through single-cell RNA sequencing, we identify a lipid-laden CAF subpopulation marked by ABCA8a in Setd2-deficient pancreatic tumors. Our findings reveal that tumor-intrinsic SETD2 loss unleashes BMP2 signaling via ectopic gain of H3K27Ac, leading to CAFs differentiation toward lipid-rich phenotype. Lipid-laden CAFs then enhance tumor progression by providing lipids for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation via ABCA8a transporter. Together, our study links CAF heterogeneity to epigenetic dysregulation in tumor cells, highlighting a previously unappreciated metabolic interaction between CAFs and pancreatic tumor cells., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The surgical intervention approach to insulinomas in proximity to the main pancreatic duct remains controversial. Standard pancreatic resection is recommended by several guidelines; however, enucleation (EN) still attracts surgeons with less risk of late exocrine/endocrine insufficiency, despite a higher postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate. Recently, the efficacy and safety of preoperative pancreatic stent placement before the EN have been demonstrated. Thus, a multicentre open-label study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stent placement in improving the outcome of EN of insulinomas in proximity to the main pancreatic duct., Methods and Analysis: This is a prospective, randomised, open-label, superiority clinical trial conducted at multiple tertiary centres in China. The major eligibility criterion is the presence of insulinoma located in the head and neck of the pancreas in proximity (≤2 mm) to the main pancreatic duct. Blocked randomisation will be performed to allocate patients into the stent EN group and the direct EN group. Patients in the stent EN group will go through stent placement by the endoscopist within 24 hours before the EN surgery, whereas other patients will receive EN surgery directly. The primary outcome is the assessment of the superiority of stent placement in reducing POPF rate measured by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery standard. Both interventions will be performed in an inpatient setting and regular follow-up will be performed. The primary outcome (POPF rate) will be tested for superiority with the Χ 2 test. The difference in secondary outcomes between the two groups will be analysed using appropriate tests., Ethics and Dissemination: The study has been approved by the Peking Union Medical College Hospital Institutional Review Board (K23C0195), Ruijin Hospital Ethics Committee (2023-314), Peking University First Hospital Ethics Committee (2024033-001), Institutional Review Board of Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University (2023223-002), Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (XJTU1AF2023LSK-473), Institutional Review Board of Tongji Medical College Tongji Hospital (TJ-IRB202402059), Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College Union Hospital (2023-0929) and Shanghai Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (2309282-16). The results of the study will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal., Trial Registration Number: NCT05523778., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Although the molecular features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have been well described, the impact of detailed gene mutation subtypes on disease progression remained unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different TP53 mutation subtypes on clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with PDAC., Methods: We included 639 patients treated with PDAC in Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine between Jan 2019 and Jun 2021. The genomic alterations of PDAC were analyzed, and the association of TP53 mutation subtypes and other core gene pathway alterations with patients' clinical characteristics were evaluated by Chi-squared test, Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model., Results: TP53 missense mutation was significantly associated with poor differentiation in KRAS mut PDAC (50.7% vs. 36.1%, P = 0.001). In small-sized (≤ 2 cm) KRAS mut tumors, significantly higher LNs involvement (54.8% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.010) and distal metastic rate (20.5% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.030) were observed in those with TP53 missense mutation instead of truncating mutation. Compared with TP53 truncating mutation, missense mutation was significantly associated with reduced DFS (6.6 [5.6-7.6] vs. 9.2 [5.2-13.3] months, HR 0.368 [0.200-0.677], P = 0.005) and OS (9.6 [8.0-11.1] vs. 18.3 [6.7-30.0] months, HR 0.457 [0.248-0.842], P = 0.012) in patients who failed to receive chemotherapy, while higher OS (24.2 [20.8-27.7] vs. 23.8 [19.0-28.5] months, HR 1.461 [1.005-2.124], P = 0.047) was observed in TP53 missense cases after chemotherapy., Conclusions: TP53 missense mutation was associated with poor tumor differentiation, and revealed gain-of-function properties in small-sized KRAS transformed PDAC. Nonetheless, it was not associated with insensitivity to chemotherapy, highlighting the neoadjuvant therapy before surgery as the potential optimized strategy for the treatment of a subset of patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) often experience short-term relapse and dismal survival, suggesting an urgent need to develop predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers for these populations. Given the potential associations of the human leukocyte antigen class I ( HLA -I) genotype with oncogenic mutational profile and immunotherapy efficacy, we aimed to assess whether differential HLA -I genotype could predict the postoperative outcomes in resected PAAD patients., Materials and Methods: HLA -I ( A , B , and C ) genotyping and somatic variants of 608 Chinese PAAD patients were determined by targeted next-generation sequencing of matched blood cells and tumor tissues. HLA - A / B alleles were classified with the available definition of 12 supertypes. The Kaplan-Meier curves of disease-free survival (DFS) and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were performed to determine the survival difference in 226 selected patients with radical resection. Early-stage (I-II) patients constituted the majority (82%, 185/226) and some stage I-II individuals with high-quality tumor samples were analyzed by RNA-sequencing to examine immunophenotypes., Results: Patients with HLA-A02 + B62 + B44 - had significantly shorter DFS (median, 239 vs. 410 days; hazard ratio=1.65, P =0.0189) than patients without this genotype. Notably, stage I-II patients carrying HLA-A02 + B62 + B44 - had sharply shorter DFS than those without HLA-A02 + B62 + B44 - (median, 237 vs. 427 days; hazard ratio=1.85, P =0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed that HLA-A02 + B62 + B44 - was associated with significantly inferior DFS ( P =0.014) in stage I-II patients but not in stage III patients. Mechanistically, HLA-A02 + B62 + B44 - patients were associated with a high rate of KRAS G12D and TP53 mutations, lower HLA-A expression, and less inflamed T-cell infiltration., Conclusion: The current results suggest that a specific combination of germline HLA-A02/B62/B44 supertype, HLA-A02 + B62 + B44 - , was a potential predictor for DFS in early-stage PAAD patients after surgery., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: The pre-adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC) status of postoperative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients has not been studied and elaborated well previously., Method: The association of PAC variables and prognoses was explored using a multivariable Cox model, restricted cubic spline analysis, and correlation analysis. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcome was chemotherapy completeness (CHC)., Results: A total of 401 eligible patients were enrolled in sequential surgery and chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen, PAC fasting blood glucose (FBG), and elevated fasting blood glucose (eFBG) status were associated with CHC (regimen types: p = 0.005, continuous FBG: p = 0.014, eFBG status: p = 0.012). Early administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (<34 days) was a risk factor for the limited OS and PFS (OS: aHR: 1.61 [1.09-2.38], p = 0.016; PFS: aHR: 1.91 [1.29-2.82], p = 0.001). Patients with higher PAC body mass index (BMI), receiving Gemcap regimen, and with lower PAC tumor marker value were observed with better survival prognoses (PAC BMI: OS: 0.927 [0.875-0.983], p = 0.011; Gemcap: OS: 0.533 [0.312-0.913], p = 0.022; Gemcap: PFS: 0.560 [0.341-0.922], p = 0.023; PAC CA125: OS: 1.004 [1.002-1.006], p < 0.001; PAC CA125: PFS: 1.003 [1.000-1.005], p = 0.031; PAC CEA: OS: 1.050 [1.026-1.074], p < 0.001). The BMI decrease was mainly concentrated in the first 3 months of chemotherapy courses (first 3 months: p < 0.001; latter 3 months: p = 0.097). And CEA, compared to CA125 and CA199, was a better prognostic indicator (CEA: first 3 months: PFS p = 0.011, OS p < 0.001; latter 3 months: PFS p = 0.024, OS p = 0.041)., Conclusion: PDAC patients should be treated with adjuvant chemotherapy over 34 postoperative days. PAC sarcopenia was a risk factor for OS, but not PFS and limited CHC. Those with higher PAC FBG levels were more likely to finish chemotherapy. CEA, compared to CA125 and CA199, was a better prognostic indicator., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Limited data are available regarding long-term oncological outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who undergo robotic pancreatectomy (RP)., Method: All patients who underwent RP and open pancreatectomy (OP) for resectable PDAC between January 2011 and December 2019 were included. The RP group was matched 1:1 with OP group by propensity score matching (PSM). The oncological outcomes were collected and analyzed., Results: Overall, 1606 patients were included in this study. After PSM, a well-balanced cohort of 335 patients in each group was selected for further analysis. The RP group had shorter operative time (210 min vs. 240 min, P < 0.001), lower estimated blood loss (200 ml vs. 300 ml, P = 0.011), lower wound infection rates (4.5% vs. 10.1%, P = 0.005) and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (15 days vs. 17 days, P = 0.001) compared to the OP group, with no significant differences in other perioperative outcomes. OS was comparable between the two groups (31 months vs. 28 months, P = 0.077); however, RFS was improved in the RP group (17 months vs. 14 months, P = 0.015). Subgroup analysis showed that patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in the RP group had better RFS than the similar patient cohort in the OP group (17 months vs. 14 months, P = 0.024)., Conclusion: Robotic pancreatectomy is safe and oncologically effective for resectable PDAC. OS was comparable between RP and OP, and RFS was improved in the RP group, especially in patients who receive AC., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Venous resection and reconstruction (VR) is a feasible surgical technique to achieve optimal outcomes in selected patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who undergo open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). However, data regarding patient outcomes in patients who undergo VR in robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) are scarce., Methods: All patients with a diagnosis of PDAC who underwent upfront open or robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with VR in a high-volume institution for pancreatic surgery between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between the RPD and OPD cohorts., Results: A total of 84 patients were included in the final analysis, 14 patients underwent RPD with VR and 70 who had OPD with VR. Reconstructed venous patency, postoperative 30-day morbidity, and 90-day mortality were comparable; however, lymph node resection rates were lower in the RPC cohort (p = 0.029). No difference was identified in 3-year survival rates between the two groups (34.0% versus 25.7% respectively, p = 0.667)., Conclusion: RPD with VR is a feasible approach for patients with PDAC and venous invasion. Further studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes compared to the open approach., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Pancreatoduodenectomy is a complex and challenging procedure that requires meticulous tissue dissection and proficient suturing skills. Minimally invasive surgery with the utilization of robotic platforms has demonstrated advantages in perioperative patient outcomes in retrospective studies. The development of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) in specific has progressed significantly, since first reported in 2003, and high-volume centers in pancreatic surgery are reporting large patient series with improved pain management and reduced length of stay. However, prospective studies to assess objectively the feasibility and safety of RPD compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) are currently lacking., Methods/design: The PORTAL trial is a multicenter randomized controlled, patient-blinded, parallel-group, phase III non-inferiority trial performed in seven high-volume centers for pancreatic and robotic surgery in China (> 20 RPD and > 100 OPD annually in each participating center). The trial is designed to enroll and randomly assign 244 patients with an indication for elective pancreatoduodenectomy for malignant periampullary and pancreatic lesions, as well as premalignant and symptomatic benign periampullary and pancreatic disease. The primary outcome is time to functional recovery postoperatively, measured in days. Secondary outcomes include postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as perioperative costs. A sub-cohort of 128 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will also be compared to assess the percentage of patients who undergo postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy within 8 weeks, in each arm. Secondary outcomes in this cohort will include patterns of disease recurrence, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival., Discussion: The PORTAL trial is designed to assess the feasibility and safety of RPD compared to OPD, in terms of functional recovery as described previously. Additionally, this trial will explore whether RPD allows increased access to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, in a sub-cohort of patients with PDAC., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04400357 . Registered on May 22, 2020., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) is one of the most lethal carcinomas, and the current histopathological classifications are of limited use in clinical decision-making. There is an unmet need to identify new biomarkers for prognosis-informative molecular subtyping and ultimately for precision medicine., Methods: We profiled genomic alterations for 608 PAAD patients in a Chinese cohort, including somatic mutations, pathogenic germline variants and copy number variations (CNV). Using the CNV information, we performed unsupervised consensus clustering of these patients, differential CNV analysis and functional/pathway enrichment analysis. Cox regression was conducted for progression-free survival analysis, the elastic net algorithm used for prognostic model construction, and rank-based gene set enrichment analysis for exploring tumor microenvironments., Findings: Our data did not support prognostic value of point mutations in either highly mutated genes (such as KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A and SMAD4) or homologous recombination repair genes. Instead, associated with worse prognosis were amplified genes involved in DNA repair and receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) related signalings. Motivated by this observation, we categorized patients into four molecular subtypes (namely repair-deficient, proliferation-active, repair-proficient and repair-enhanced) that differed in prognosis, and also constructed a prognostic model that can stratify patients with low or high risk of relapse. Finally, we analyzed publicly available datasets, not only reinforcing the prognostic value of our identified genes in DNA repair and RTK related signalings, but also identifying tumor microenvironment correlates with prognostic risks., Interpretation: Together with the evidence from genomic footprint analysis, we suggest that repair-deficient and proliferation-active subtypes are better suited for DNA damage therapies, while immunotherapy is highly recommended for repair-proficient and repair-enhanced subtypes. Our results represent a significant step in molecular subtyping, diagnosis and management for PAAD patients., Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81470894, 81502695, 81672325, 81871906, 82073326, 82103482 and 32170663), the Shanghai Sailing Program (grant number 20YF1426900), and the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning (awarded to H.F.)., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We aimed to describe our experience and the learning curve of 450 cases of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and optimize the surgical process so that our findings can be useful for surgeons starting to perform RPD., Summary Background Data: Robotic surgical systems were first introduced 20 years ago. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a challenging surgery because of its technical difficulty. RPD may overcome some of these difficulties., Methods: The medical records of 450 patients who underwent RPD between May 2010 and December 2018 at the Shanghai Ruijin Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Operative times and estimated blood loss (EBL) were analyzed and the learning curve was determined. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to identify the inflexion points. Other postoperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and long-term follow-up were also analyzed., Results: Operative time improved graduallyovertimefrom405.4 ± 112.9 minutes (case 1-50) to 273.6 ± 70 minutes (case 301-350) (P < 0.001). EBL improved from 410 ± 563.5 mL (case 1-50) to 149.0 ± 103.3 mL (case 351-400) (P< 0.001). According to the CUSUM curve, there were 3 phases in the RPD learning curve. The inflexion points were around cases 100 and 250. The incidence of pancreatic leak in the last 350 cases was significantly lower than that in the first 100 cases (30.0% vs 15.1%, P = 0.003)., Conclusions: RPD is safe and feasible for selected patients. Operative and oncologic outcomes were much improved after experience of 250 cases. Our optimization of the surgical process may have also contributed to this. Future prospective and randomized studies are needed to confirm our results., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery is associated with worse oncologic outcomes for some but not other types of cancers. We conducted a propensity score-matched analysis to compare oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic (RPD) vs. open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)., Methods: Treatment-naïve PDAC patients undergoing either RPD or OPD at our hospital between January 2013 and December 2017 were included. Propensity score matching was conducted at a ratio of 1:2. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 672 cases were identified. The propensity score-matched cohort included 105 patients receiving RPD and 210 patients receiving OPD. The 2 groups did not differ in the number of retrieved lymph nodes [11 (7-16) vs. 11 (6-17), P = 0.622] and R0 resection rate (88.6% vs. 89.0%, P = 0.899). There was no statistically significant difference in median DFS (14 [95% CI 11-22] vs. 12 [95% CI 10-14] months (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.87-1.50; log-rank P = 0.345) and median OS (27 [95% CI 22-35] vs. 20 [95% CI 18-24] months (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.57-1.04; log-rank P = 0.087) between the two groups. Multivariate COX analysis showed that RPD was not an independent predictor of DFS (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.68-1.19, P = 0.456) or OS (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.57-1.05, P = 0.094)., Conclusion: Comparable DFS and OS were observed between patients receiving RPD and OPD. This preliminary finding requires further confirmation with prospective randomized controlled trials.

Objective: To compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy (RMP) and robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP)., Methods: From August 2010 to May 2018, more than 800 patients were diagnosed with benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumours. According to the inclusion criteria, a total of 164 patients were included in our study. Among them 123 patients received RMP and 41 patients received RDP with spleen-preserving. These patients were divided into two groups, and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize bias. Short-term and long-term outcomes were recorded and analysed., Results: After 1:1 matching, 38 cases of RMP and RDP were recorded and the baseline data was balanced. In the RMP group, 14 patients (36.8%) were female. In the RDP group, 13 patients (34.2%) were female. RDP had advantages in short-term outcomes including overall morbidity (28.9% vs. 60.5%, p = 0.011), Severe morbidity (0 vs. 10.5%, p = 0.017), clinical-relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) rate (10.5% vs. 36.8%, p = 0.007) and postoperative length of hospital stay (16.5 ± 8.6 days vs. 23.6 ± 12.9 days, p = 0.006). The operative time was similar; however, there were less estimated blood loss (EBL) in RMP group (31.3 ± 33.0 ml vs. 62.3 ± 38.2 ml, p<0.001). Patients in these two groups had a similar result in preservation of the pancreatic function. There was no statistic difference in incidence rate of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency between two groups (2.6% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.608; 5.3% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.671)., Conclusion: For benign or low-grade malignant tumours located at the neck of the pancreas, RMP and RDP could both be considered. The morbidity especially CR-POPF rate after RDP would be lower, but RMP would be more helpful in reducing EBL. RMP should be chosen with caution as it did not show a huge advantage in preserving normal pancreatic function. Further prospective randomised studies should be designed to compare these two types of surgery., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of open and robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy (ODP and RDP) for benign and low-grade malignant tumors., Methods: The patients who underwent RDP and ODP for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors at our center were included. After PSM at a 1:1 ratio, the perioperative variations in the two cohorts were compared., Results: After 1:1 PSM, 219 cases of RDP and ODP were recorded. The RDP cohort showed advantages in the operative duration [120 (90-150) min vs 175 (130-210) min, P < 0.001], estimated blood loss [50 (30-175) ml vs 200 (100-300) ml, P < 0.001], spleen preservation rate (63.5% vs 26.5%, P < 0.001), infection rate (4.6% vs 12.3%, P = 0.006), and gastrointestinal function recovery [3 (2-4) vs. 3 (3-5), P = 0.019]. There were no significant differences in postoperative pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying. Multivariate analysis showed that RDP (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16-0.36, P < 0.001), age (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.03, P = 0.033), tumor size (HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.17-1.40, P < 0.001), pathological inflammatory neoplasm type (HR 5.12; 95% CI 2.22-11.81, P < 0.001), and estimated blood loss (HR 1.003; 95% CI 1.001-1.004, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of spleen preservation; RDP (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.17-0.43, P < 0.001), age (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.03, P = 0.022), elevated CA 19-9 level (HR 2.55; 95% CI 1.02-6.39, P = 0.046), tumor size (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.29-1.61, P < 0.001), pathological inflammatory neoplasm type (HR 4.48; 95% CI 1.69-11.85, P = 0.003), and estimated blood loss (HR 1.003; 95% CI 1.001-1.004, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of spleen preservation with the Kimura technique., Conclusion: RDP has advantages in the operative time, blood loss, spleen preservation, infection rate, and gastrointestinal function recovery over ODP in treating benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors. The robotic-assisted approach was an independent predictor of spleen preservation and use of the Kimura technique.

Objective: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) causing ectopic adrenal corticotropic hormone (ACTH) syndrome (EAS) are rare and aggressive with little known information. We aimed to elucidate the clinical features and molecular mechanisms of pNETs with EAS by methylation analysis., Methods: Seven patients with ectopic ACTH-secreting pNETs who were diagnosed at Shanghai Clinical Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases Center and Pancreatic Disease Center in Ruijin Hospital between 2001 and 2019 were enrolled. Twenty patients with ectopic ACTH-secreting thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNETs) and 7 with nonfunctional pNETs (nf-pNETs) were also enrolled as controls. We collected clinical data and measured POMC promoter CpG methylation., Results: All 7 patients had elevated ACTH and urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels with positive ACTH staining in the pancreas and were diagnosed with ectopic ACTH-secreting pNET. Of the 7 patients, 6 underwent surgery and 1 underwent transarterial embolization (TAE). Two patients were free of disease after surgery; 2 died within 90 days after surgery; and 3 had metastases and died within 1 year. Compared with ACTH-secreting TNETs, ACTH-secreting pNETs had similar clinical and biochemical features but a significantly poorer prognosis. POMC promoter CpG methylation was significantly lower in ACTH-secreting pNETs than in nf-pNETs and normal pancreas., Conclusions: ACTH-secreting pNETs are aggressive and fatal. Surgery is definitively curative for patients with resectable primary tumors without metastasis. Pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) promoter hypomethylation caused pNETs to produce ACTH. This study further supplements the genetic features of ACTH-secreting NETs., (© Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant tumor characterized by poor prognosis. TNM stage cannot always provide accurate prediction of prognosis, which is vital for individualized treatment. Therefore, a novel way to identify patients with poor prognosis after radical surgery is urgently needed. MATERIAL AND METHODS The nomogram was established based on a discovery cohort that included 554 patients with PDAC who had received radical surgery from 2012 to 2016. The clinicopathological data were collected. Poor prognosis was evaluated using 25 features, in which appropriate features for a prediction model were identified. A prediction model incorporating the selected features was established. The discriminative capacity was assessed by C-index, calibration by calibration plot, and clinical usefulness by decision curve. The bootstrapping approach was used to perform internal validation. RESULTS Characteristics included in the nomogram were coronary artery disease and stroke history, elevated CA125, AJCC stage >II, R0 resection, operating time >6 h, poor differentiation, nerve invasion, length of stay >30 days, and postoperative complications. A C-index of 0.713 indicated good discrimination of the prediction model, and the calibration curve showed acceptable calibration. Survival analysis showed that this model had better discriminative capacity than the AJCC staging system and could distinguish relatively good prognosis from poor prognosis in patients at stage II (especially IIa) and IV. CONCLUSIONS Our study presents a valid and practical model to predict prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients, which contributes to individualized therapy by assisting surgeons to predict poor prognosis in patients who received radical surgery.

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety, and rate of postoperative complications after robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy compared with open middle pancreatectomy., Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, China, involving 170 patients who underwent robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy or open middle pancreatectomy from December 2010 to December 2017. Patients were in 1 of 2 groups: robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy (n = 110) and open middle pancreatectomy (n = 60)., Results: Among the 110 patients who underwent robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy, age, operation time, blood loss, and tumor size were 47 ± 14 y, 162 ± 63 min, 88 ± 93 mL, and 2.4±1.3 cm (mean ± standard deviation), respectively. Among the 60 patients who underwent open middle pancreatectomy, age, operation time, blood loss, and tumor size were 53 ± 14 y, 208 ± 52 min, 195 ± 165 mL, and 2.5 ± 1.4 cm (mean ± standard deviation), respectively. Mean operation time and blood loss were less in the robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy group (P < .001 each). Overall morbidity rate in the robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy group was 51.8% and 40% in open middle pancreatectomy group (P = .140). Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas developed in 38 (34.5%) patients in the robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy group and 13 (22%) in the open middle pancreatectomy group (P = .105). A total of 10 patients in the robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy group and 3 patients in the open middle pancreatectomy group required a reoperation or angiographic embolization because of postoperative bleeding. The mean hospital stay was similar in the 2 groups (25 ± 13 d versus and 24 ± 18 d). There was 1 postoperative death in each group because of postoperative bleeding and a pulmonary embolus, respectively. The tumors in this study included 65 serous cystic neoplasms, 6 mucinous cystic neoplasms, 35 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, 29 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, 31 solid pseudopapillary tumors, 1 paraganglioma, and 3 pancreatic cysts., Conclusion: Middle pancreatectomy is a safe and effective robotic operative procedure, and when possible, robot-assisted middle pancratectomy might be the preferred method, because it was associated with decreased operative time and decreased blood loss. The lesser operation time might be attributed to different reconstruction methods that were chosen in the open and robotic approach. Pancreatic fistula remains the major complication., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the outcome of pancreatic metastatic renal cell carcinoma (PmRCC) after treatment and share the relevent results., Methods: In total, 13 patients with PmRCC were diagnosed and treated in our institution from December 2013 to October 2017. We retrospectively reviewed the records and analyzed the patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and overall survival. Simultaneously, our experience including treatment and misdiagnosis was shared., Results: The median time between nephrectomy and reoperation for pancreatic recurrence was 11 years (range 1-20 years). Four patients had multiple tumors and nine patients had solitary tumor. Five patients accepted distal pancreatectomy, and five patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. One patient underwent total pancreatectomy, one patient underwent duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection plus distal pancreatectomy, and one patient underwent exploratory laparotomy and gastrointestinal bypass due to widespread metastasis with clear obstructive symptoms. The misdiagnosis rate of preoperative diagnosis at our center was 69.2% (9/13). The median follow-up duration was 26 months (range 7-53 months, until June 2018). By the end of follow-up, 12 patients were alive and one patient died of gastrointestinal bleeding within 1 month after surgery., Conclusions: PmRCCs are uncommon, but pancreatic metastasectomy has a relatively good prognosis and may, therefore, be a good therapeutic choice for patients with PmRCCs. Because PmRCC occurs long after the primary tumor resection, long-term follow-up is necessary. Besides, detailed medical history and specific manifestation in imaging features could contribute to avoiding misdiagnosis.

CCL17 is well known for its ability to engage CCR4 + CD8 + T cells, which have been shown to play a critical role in preventing tumorigenesis. In this study, we attempted to inhibit in vivo pancreatic tumorigenesis by engaging murine CCR4 + CD8 + T cells through a drug-eluting scaffold with a payload of CCL17. The drug-eluting scaffold was fabricated by electrospinning polyglyconate and porcine gelatin. The electrospun scaffold featured randomly distributed non-woven fibers with diameters ranging from 1μm to 4μm. The in vitro study confirmed that scaffolding materials were non-cytotoxic to pancreatic cancer cells. The in vivo study showed an increased presence of murine CCR4 + CD8 + T cells into the tumor mass treated with drug-eluting scaffold compared to those with non-eluting scaffold or the control groups. The weights of tumor masses were 132.04mg±12.25mg in the control group, 158.12mg±18.98mg in the NES group and 96.22mg±14.56mg in the DES group, respectively. The volumes of tumor masses were 1035.21mm 3 ±128.97mm 3 in the control group, 978.56mm 3 ±110.19mm 3 in the NES group and 634.35mm 3 ±87.12mm 3 in the DES group, respectively. Further study showed that the increased presence of CCR4 + CD8 + T cells also inhibited the hepatic metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells. Our study shed a new light on the post-operative treatment of pancreatic cancer to prevent the recurrence., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The most effective and radical treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is surgical resection. Minimally invasive surgery has been increasingly used in pancreatectomy. Initial results in robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) have been encouraging. Nonetheless, data comparing outcomes of RDP with those of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) in treating PNETs are rare. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of RDP and LDP for PNETs., Methods: From September 2010 to January 2017, operative parameters and perioperative outcomes in an initial experience with 43 consecutive patients undergoing RDP were collected and compared with those in 31 patients undergoing LDP., Results: Patients undergoing RDP and LDP demonstrated equivalent age, sex, ASA score, tumor location and tumor size. Operating time, length of resected pancreas, postoperative length of hospital stay and rates of conversion to open, pancreatic fistula, transfusion and reoperation were not statistically different. Patients in the RDP group were associated with significantly higher overall (79.1 vs. 48.4 %, P = 0.006) and Kimura spleen preservation rates (72.1 vs. 16.1%, P < 0.001) and had reduced risk of excessive blood loss (50 vs. 200mL, P < 0.001). Oncological outcomes in this series were superior for the RDP group with more lymph node harvest for G2 and G3 PNETs (3.5 vs. 2, P = 0.034)., Conclusions: Both RDP and LDP are efficacious and safe methods in treating PNETs located in the body or tail of pancreas. Robotic approach offers advantages with less intraoperative blood loss, higher spleen preservation rate and more lymph node harvest. It may be sensible to choose RDP for patients who fit indications for scheduled spleen preservation.

Background: As a tissue-sparing procedure, pancreatic enucleation has become an alternative for benign or borderline pancreatic tumours; it has been proved to be safe and feasible. To date, a large sample size of robotic pancreatic enucleation has not been reported. This study aimed to discuss the clinical evaluation and postoperative complications after robotic pancreatic enucleation and compare it with open surgery., Methods: Patients who underwent robotic or open pancreatic enucleation during December 2010-December 2014 at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, affiliated with the Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine in China, were included. Clinical data were collected and analysed., Results: Patients were divided into an open group and a robotic group: 26 patients underwent robotic pancreatic enucleation, of whom 13 patients were female. The mean age was 51.7 years, the operation time was 125.7 ± 58.8 min, blood loss was 49.4 ± 33.4 ml and mean tumour size was 18.8 ± 7.9 mm; 17 patients underwent open pancreatic enucleation, of whom 11 were female. The mean age was 54.6 ± 17.2 min, blood loss was 198.5 ± 70.7 ml and mean tumour size was 3.5 ± 1.9 cm. Pathology included insulinomas, intrapancreatic mucinous neoplasmas (IPMNs), pancreatic neuro-endocrine tumours (PNETs), solid pseudopapillary tumours (SPTs) and serous cystadenomas (SCAs). Robotic pancreatic enucleations were associated with less trauma, shorter operation time, less blood loss and faster wound recovery compared with open pancreatic enucleation. Pancreatic fistulas (PFs) were the main complication that occurred in the robotic group; infection also occurred in the open group. All patients recovered after effective drainage and the use of somatostatin. The mean follow-up time was 25 months. No recurrence was discovered, and one patient in the open group suffered endocrine insufficiency., Conclusion: Robotic pancreatic enucleation is a safe and effective surgical procedure for pancreatic benign and borderline tumours. It produces less trauma than open pancreatic enucleation and might extend the indications for enucleation. The PF rate after surgery is still high and a long-term follow-up needs to be performed. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications, safety, feasibility, and short- and long-term outcomes for elderly patients who underwent robot-assisted middle pancreatectomies (MPs)., Material and Methods: Ten patients (≥60 years) underwent robot-assisted middle pancreatectomies from 2012 to 2015. The perioperative data, including tumor size, operating time, rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), postoperative morbidity, and other parameters, were analyzed. We collected and analyzed the follow-up information., Results: The mean age of patients was 64.30 years (range, 60-73 years). The average tumor size was 2.61 cm. The 10 cases were all benign or low-grade malignant lesions. The mean operating time was 175.00 min. The mean blood loss was 113.00 ml with no blood transfusion needed. Postoperative fistulas developed in 5 patients; there were 2 Grade A fistulas and 3 grade B fistulas. There were 3 patients who underwent postoperative complications, including 2 Grade 1 or 2 complications and 1 Grade 3 complication. No reoperation and postoperative mortality occurred. The mean hospital stay was 19.91 days. After a median follow-up of 23 months, new onset of diabetes mellitus developed in 1 patient and none suffered from deterioration of previously diagnosed diabetes or exocrine insufficiency, and no tumor recurrence happened., Conclusions: Robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy was safe and feasible for elderly people. It had low risk of exocrine or endocrine dysfunction and benefited patients' long-term outcomes. Incidence of POPF was relatively high but we could prevent it from resulting in bad outcomes by scientific perioperative care and systemic treatment.

Background: To explore the feasibility, safety, and indications of the modified Appleby operation for carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas and to identify prognostic factors., Material and Methods: Data from a total of 15 patients receiving the modified Appleby operation in our department were retrospectively analyzed. Correlation analyses and univariate and multivariate analyses of the survival time were performed to identify prognostic factors., Results: The operations were successful in all 15 patients. The median survival time was 19 mo except in one case, where the patient died; and the 1- and 3-y survival rates were 86.7% (13/15) and 6.7% (1/15), respectively. A positive correlation was found between age and survival time (P = 0.037, Pearson correlation = 0.541). In addition, univariate analysis, age, operative time, and perineural invasion were correlated with survival time (P = 0.029, 0.035, and 0.049, respectively). Finally, multivariate analysis revealed that only age ≥ 60 y was correlated with survival (Hazard ratio = 0.263, P = 0.044)., Conclusions: The improved Appleby operation was feasible and safe when performed in experienced centers by experienced surgeons and can improve the patients' survival time and quality of life. Statistical analysis suggests that elderly patients may have a better prognosis than younger patients to some extent., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent studies have revealed that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles in cancer biology and that lncRNA gas5 (growth arrest-specific 5) regulates breast cancer cell growth. However, the role of gas5 in pancreatic cancer progression remains largely unknown. In the current study, we assay the expression level of gas5 in pancreatic cancer tissues and define the role of gas5 in the regulation of pancreatic cancer cell proliferation. We verify that the expression level of gas5 is significantly decreased in pancreatic cancer tissues compared with normal control. Overexpression of gas5 in pancreatic cancer cells inhibits cell proliferation, whereas gas5 inhibition induces a significant decrease in G0/G1 phase and an increase in S phase. We further demonstrate that gas5 negatively regulates CDK6 (cyclin-dependent kinase 6) expression in vitro and in vivo. More importantly, knockdown of CDK6 partially abrogates gas5-siRNA-induced cell proliferation. These data suggest an important role of gas5 in the molecular etiology of pancreatic cancer and implicate the potential application of gas5 in pancreatic cancer therapy.

Traditional post-surgical chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer is notorious for its devastating side effects due to the high dosage required. On the other hand, legitimate concerns have been raised about nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery because of its potential cytotoxicity. Therefore, we explored the local delivery of a reduced dosage of FOLFIRINOX, a four-drug regimen comprising oxaliplatin, leucovorin, irinotecan, and fluorouracil, for pancreatic cancer using a biocompatible drug-eluting scaffold as a novel chemotherapy strategy after palliative surgery. In vitro assays showed that FOLFIRINOX in the scaffold caused massive apoptosis and thereby a decrease in the viability of pancreatic cancer cells, confirming the chemotherapeutic capability of the drug-eluting scaffold. In vivo studies in an orthotopic murine xenograft model demonstrated that the FOLFIRINOX in the scaffold had antitumorigenic and antimetastatic effects comparable with those achieved by intraperitoneal injection, despite the dose released by the scaffold being roughly two thirds lower. A mechanistic study attributed our results to the excellent ability of the FOLFIRINOX in the scaffold to destroy the CD133(+)CXCR4(+) cell population responsible for pancreatic tumorigenesis and metastasis. This clinically oriented study gives rise to a promising alternative strategy for postsurgical management of pancreatic cancer, featuring a local chemotherapeutic effect with considerable attenuation of side effects.