Search

Purpose: To define the prognostic role of lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and identify predictors of LNI using a comprehensive multifactor analysis focusing on preoperative radiological features., Methods: This study included 236 patients with preoperative computed tomography who underwent radical surgical resection of PNETs at our hospital between 2009 and 2019. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors associated with LNI and tumor recurrence. The disease-free survival (DFS) rates with and without LNI were compared., Results: Forty-four of the 236 patients (18.6%) had LNI. Biliopancreatic duct dilatation (odds ratio [OR], 2.295; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.046-5.035; p = 0.038), tumor margin (OR, 2.189; 95% CI, 1.034-4.632; p = 0.041), and WHO grade (G2: OR, 2.923; 95% CI, 1.005-8.507; p = 0.049; G3: OR, 12.067; 95% CI, 3.057-47.629; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors of LNI in PNETs. Multivariable analysis showed that LNI (OR, 2.728; 95% CI, 1.070-6.954; p = 0.036), G3 (OR, 4.894; 95% CI, 1.047-22.866; p = 0.044), and biliopancreatic duct dilatation (OR, 2.895; 95% CI, 1.124-7.458; p = 0.028) were associated with PNET recurrence in patients after surgery. Patients with LNI had a significantly worse DFS than those without LNI (3-year DFS: 85.9 vs. 96.7%; p < 0.001; 5-year DFS: 65.1 vs. 93.9%; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: LNI was associated with decreased DFS. Biliopancreatic duct dilatation, irregular tumor margins, and grades G2 and G3 were independent risk factors for LNI., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Both cachexia and sarcopenia have been considered adverse predictors for prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer; although sarcopenia and cachexia share some similarities, they are still defined as distinct nutritional conditions. We aimed to explore the differential impacts of sarcopenia and cachexia on prognosis for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients following radical excision., Methods: From January 2015 to May 2022, 614 patients undergoing surgery for PDAC were retrospectively included. Sarcopenia was defined as the L3 total skeletal muscle index below 52.4 cm 2 /m 2 (men) and 38.5 cm 2 /m 2 (women). Cachexia was classified according to the following criteria: involuntary weight loss >5% over the past 6 months, or weight loss >2% and BMI <20 kg/m 2 , or weight loss >2% and sarcopenia., Results: Of the 614 patients included in the analysis, 62% and 48% were diagnosed with sarcopenia and cachexia, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that sarcopenia and/or cachexia were significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) rather than worse recurrence-free survival (RFS). Moreover, Cox regression analysis revealed that cachexia rather than sarcopenia was an adverse factor for OS in all PDAC patients. For poorly differentiated PDAC, both cachexia and sarcopenia were significantly associated with shorter OS. However, for moderately/well-differentiated PADC, cachexia was an independent factor for adverse OS, but not sarcopenia., Conclusions: Sarcopenia and cachexia have different effects on OS for PDAC patients undergoing radical excision. This difference may provide some important information for preoperative management., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are heterogenous neoplasms, of which the prognosis varies widely. Purely cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (C-pNETs) are a small subset of pNETs in which data are extremely rare. This study aimed to compare clinicopathological and long-term survival differences between C-pNETs and solid pNETs (S-pNETs)., Methods: A retrospective review of 242 patients with pNETs underwent resection in our institution from 2009 to 2019 was conducted. Demography characteristics, clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes of them were analyzed., Results: Sixteen out of 242 patients (6.6%) were identified as C-pNETs. Compared with S-pNETs, C-pNETs were more frequently non-functional (75% vs 45%, P = 0.02), and the median tumor diameter of C-pNETs was smaller (36 mm vs. 47 mm, P = 0.001). And the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of C-pNETs was significantly lower (31% vs 78%, P = 0.001). Of note, the majority of C-pNETs were well-differentiated with G1 (81% vs 35%, P = 0.001). And there were no G3 (0 vs 7%, P = 0.001) in C-pNETs. No T4 stage or R1/R2 surgical margin detected in C-pNETs. And only one C-pNETs (6%) had regional lymph node metastasis (N) or synchronous distant metastasis (M). Additionally, only one patient with C-pNETs (6%) suffered tumor recurrence, compared with 24 (13%) for S-pNETs. And survival analysis showed the patients with C-pNETs seemed to be with better disease-free survival (P = 0.26)., Conclusion: C-pNETs are rare subtype with possibly less aggressive behavior comparing with their solid counterparts. Recurrence and tumor-related death still occurs in patients with resected C-pNETs, although they tend to be with more favorable prognosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Histologically, the World Health Organization has classified pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (p-NENs) into well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (G1/G2 p-NETs) and poorly-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (G3 p-NECs) based on tumor mitotic counts and Ki-67 index. Recently, the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging manual has incorporated some major changes in 2017 that the TNM staging system for p-NENs should only be applied to well-differentiated G1/G2 p-NETs, while poorly-differentiated G3 p-NECs be classified according to the new system for pancreatic exocrine adenocarcinomas. However, this new manual for p-NENs has seldom been evaluated.Data of patients with both G1/G2 and G3 non-functional p-NENs (NF-p-NENs) from our institution was retrospectively collected and analyzed using 2 new AJCC 8th staging systems. We also made survival comparisons between the 8th and 7th edition system separately for different subgroups.For G1/G2 NF-p-NETs, there were 52 patients classified in AJCC 8th edition stage I, 40 in stage II, 41 in stage III and 19 in stage IV. As for G3 NF-p-NECs, 17, 19, 24, and 18 patients were respectively defined from AJCC 8th edition stage I to stage IV. In terms of the AJCC 7th staging system, the 230 patients with NF-p-NENs were totally distributed from stage I to stage IV (94, 63, 36, 37, respectively). For the survival analysis of both G1/G2 NF-p-NETs and G3 NF-p-NECs, the AJCC 7th edition system failed to discriminate the survival differences when compared stage III with stage II or stage IV (P > .05), while the 8th edition ones could perfectly allocate patients into 4 statistically different groups (P < .05). The HCIs of AJCC 8th stage for G1/G2 NF-p-NETs [HCI=0.658, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.602-0.741] and stage for G3 NF-p-NECs (HCI=0.704, 95% CI=0.595-0.813) was both statistically larger than those of AJCC 7th stage for different grading NF-p-NENs [(HCI=0.578, 95% CI=0.557-0.649; P=.031), (HCI=0.546, 95% CI=0.531-0.636; P = .019); respectively], indicating a more accurate predictive ability for the survivals of NF-p-NENs.Our data suggested the 2 new AJCC 8th staging systems were superior to its 7th edition for patients with both G1/G2 NF-p-NETs and G3 NF-p-NECs.

Background: Owing to the limited prevalence and heterogeneity, it is difficult to predict long-term survival of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-PNETs).This study aimed to evaluate the factors predicting disease-specific survival (DSS) for well-differentiated NF-PNETs., Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from 256 patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours who underwent surgical resection between January 2009 and December at our institution. Of these, 103 NF-PNETs (40%) were identified for analysis., Results: Of the 103 patients, 54 were male (52%) and the mean age was 52 years (range 21-75 years). Most patients (60/103, 58%) in our series were symptomatic. Seventeen patients (16%) died during follow-up, with a median period of 47 months. There were 88 patients with well-differentiated tumours and 10 of them (10/88, 11%) died of tumour progression. Median DSS after primary resection was 58.8 months (range 16-122 months). Multivariate analysis identified age >52 years (P = 0.038) and tumour grade G2 (P = 0.001) as statistically significant predictors of DSS. There was no association between gender, tumour size, symptoms, surgical procedure, severe complications, tumour location, tumour size, resection margin, positive lymph nodes and vascular invasion with DSS., Conclusion: Tumour grade, age, presence of symptoms and distant metastasis were related to poor DSS of NF-PNETs. Age >52 years and tumour grade G2 might be independent predictors of poor DSS for patients with well-differentiated NF-PNETs., (© 2020 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (p-NENs) are a group of highly heterogeneous tumors with distinct clinicopathological features and long-term prognosis. In 2017, in order to better stratify patients into prognostic groups and predicting their outcomes, World Health Organization (WHO) officially updated its grading system for p-NENs which distinguished these neoplasms among Grading 1 (G1) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs), G2 p-NETs, G3 p-NETs and G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (p-NECs). However, this new grading classification for p-NENs has not yet been rigorously validated., Methods: Data of patients who were surgically treated and histopathologically diagnosed as p-NENs at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2002 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed according the novel WHO 2017 grading classification., Results: We eventually enrolled 480 eligible patients with p-NENs in our present study, in which 150 patients with WHO 2017 G1 p-NETs, 158 with G2 p-NETs, 64 with G3 p-NETs and 108 with G3 p-NECs were identified. The estimated 5-year overall survival for patients with G1 p-NETs, G2 p-NETs, G3 p-NETs and G3 p-NECs was 75.8, 58.4, 35.1 and 11.1%, with a median survival time of 85.3mons, 67.4mons, 51.3mons and 26.8mons, respectively. Patients with G2 p-NETs present notably worse survival than those with G1 p-NETs (P = 0.03). Survival of G3 p-NETs were significantly worse than that of G1 p-NETs or G2 p-NETs (P < 0.001, P = 0.023, respectively), as well as that when comparing G3 p-NECs with G1 p-NETs or G2 p-NETs (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Patients with G3 p-NECs showed statistically shorter survival than those with G3 p-NETs (P < 0.001). Both WHO 2017 and 2010 grading criteria could be independent predictor for the OS of p-NENs (P = 0.016, P = 0.022; respectively). The 95% confidence intervals of WHO 2017 grading classification (0.983-9.454) was slightly smaller than that of WHO 2010 criteria (0.201-13.374), indicating a relatively more accurate predicting ability for the prognosis of p-NENs., Conclusion: The WHO 2017 grading classification for p-NENs could successfully allocate patients into four groups with distinct clinical features and significant survival differences, which might be superior to the WHO 2010 criteria for its better prognostic stratification and more accurate predicting ability.

Objective: To examine copper transporter 1 (CTR1) expression in pancreatic carcinoma cells, orthotopic xenograft pancreatic tumor model and clinical samples, and verify the effect of copper chelating agent ammonium tetrathiomolybdate (TM) regulate the expression of CTR1 in pancreatic carcinoma cells and the inhibition of pancreatic carcinoma., Methods: The expressions of copper transporter CTR1 and antioxidant protein 1 (ATOX1) in 22 clinical pancreatic ductal carcinoma and paracancer tissues 0.5-1 cm away from the tumor were measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC). PANC-1 cells were used to construct 5 orthotopic xenograft pancreatic tumor of nude mice models. Pancreatic cancer tissues and corresponding normal pancreatic tissues were collected, and the expressions of CTR1 and ATOX1 were detected by IHC and compared with clinical tissues. The proliferation of pancreatic carcinoma cells PANC-1 treated with 10, 30, 50, 100 μmol/L TM for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h was measured by CCK8 assay. The migration abilities of PANC-1 cells treated with 50 μmol/L TM for 24 h, 48 h were detected by scratch test. The expressions of CTR1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and CyclinD1 proteins in PANC-1 cells treated with 10, 30, 50, 100 μmol/L TM for 48 h were measured by Western blot. Then the subcutaneous tumor-bearing model of nude mice were established with PANC-1 cells, and the growth of tumor was observed after oral administration of 0.3 mg/d and 1.0 mg/d of TM, respectively., Results: The immunohistochemical results indicated that 19 of the 22 clinical pancreatic ductal cancer tissues of carcinoma patients had high expression of CTR1, and the same high expression of CTR1 was found in the orthotopic transplanted tumor tissues of PANC-1 nude mice. The proliferation inhibition of PANC-1 cells increased with the concentration of TM increased and the treatment time prolonged. The expressions of intracellular CTR1, VEGF and CyclinD1 all decreased with the concentration of TM increased. The cell migration ability decreased after the PANC-1 cells treated with TM. The tumor growth of PANC-1 tumor-bearing nude mice was inhibited after different doses of TM were delivered. The reduction in tumor volume and weight was more pronounced in the high-dose TM group ( P <0.05)., Conclusion: The expression of CTR1 is abnormally elevated in pancreatic carcinoma, and treatment with copper chelating agent for this target may help to inhibit pancreatic carcinoma., (Copyright© by Editorial Board of Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Science Edition).)

Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) that produce hormones leading to symptoms are classified as functional tumors, while others are classified as nonfunctional tumors. The traditional view is that functionality is a factor that affects the prognosis of pNEN patients. However, as the sample sizes of studies have increased, researches in recent years have proposed new viewpoints., Aim: To assess whether functionality is an independent factor for predicting the prognosis of pNEN patients., Methods: From January 2004 to December 2016, data of patients who underwent surgery at the primary site for the treatment of pNENs from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and West China Hospital database were retrospectively analyzed., Results: Contemporaneous data from the two databases were analyzed separately as two cohorts and then merged as the third cohort to create a large sample that was suitable for multivariate analysis. From the SEER database, age ( P = 0.006) and T stage ( P < 0.001) were independent risk factors affecting the survival. From the West China Hospital database, independent prognostic factors were age ( P = 0.034), sex ( P = 0.032), and grade ( P = 0.039). The result of the cohort consisting of the combined populations from the two databases showed that race ( P = 0.015), age ( P = 0.002), sex ( P = 0.032) and T stage ( P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. In the West China Hospital database and in the total population, nonfunctional pNETs and other functional pNETs tended to have poorer prognoses than insulinoma. However, functionality was not associated with the survival time of patients with pNETs in the multivariate analysis., Conclusion: Functionality is not associated with prognosis. Race, age, sex, and T stage are independent factors for predicting the survival of patients with pNETs., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are generally considered to have a favorable overall prognosis after resection, disease recurrence has been observed. Few studies have specifically addressed recurrence after resection of PNETs, especially for non-functioning PNETs (NF-PNETs). The aim of our study is to analyze the recurrence of resected well-differentiated NF-PNETs.Patients who underwent surgical resection for grade 1 and 2 NF-PNETs without synchronous metastasis were identified for analysis. Patients were treated from January 2009 to December 2017 in our institution. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis were conducted to identify prognostic factors.Of the 88 patients, 46 were men (52%) and the mean age was 52 years. With a median follow-up of 49.1 months (range, 8-122 months), there were 12 recurrences (14%). Liver was the most common recurrence site (7/12, 58%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival was 99%, 90%, and 88%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified that age >52 years, positive lymph nodes, tumor grade 2, and Ki67 index ≥5% were statistically significant. Multivariate analysis identified that Ki67 index ≥5% (hazard ratio [HR], 4.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-16.75, P = .015), positive lymph nodes (HR, 6.75; 95% CI, 1.73-24.43, P = .006) were independently associated with recurrence. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 53% (95% CI, 14.20-91.81%) for patients with Ki-67 ≥5% or (and) positive lymph nodes, while 95% (95% CI, 82.26-100%) for the patients without these 2 factors.Ki67 index and lymph node status are independently associated with recurrence after resection of well-differentiated NF-PNETs in this study.

Background: In a pathological examination of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, a resection margin without cancer cells in 1 mm is recognized as R0; a resection margin with cancer cells in 1 mm is recognized as R1. The preoperative identification of R0 and R1 is of great significance for surgical decision and prognosis. We conducted a preliminary radiomics study based on preoperative CT (computer tomography) images to evaluate a resection margin which was R0 or R1., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 258 preoperative CT images of 86 patients (34 cases of R0 and 52 cases of R1) who were diagnosed as pancreatic head adenocarcinoma and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The radiomics study consists of five stages: (i) delineate and segment regions of interest (ROIs); (ii) by solving discrete Laplacian equations with Dirichlet boundary conditions, fit the ROIs to rectangular regions; (iii) enhance the textures of the fitted ROIs combining wavelet transform and fractional differential; (iv) extract texture features from the enhanced ROIs combining wavelet transform and statistical analysis methods; and (v) reduce features using principal component analysis (PCA) and classify the resection margins using the support vector machine (SVM), and then investigate the associations between texture features and histopathological characteristics using the Mann-Whitney U -test. To reduce overfitting, the SVM classifier embedded a linear kernel and adopted the leave-one-out cross-validation., Results: It achieved an AUC (area under receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.8614 and an accuracy of 84.88%. Setting p ≤ 0.01 in the Mann-Whitney U -test, two features of the run-length matrix, which are derived from diagonal sub-bands in wavelet decomposition, showed statistically significant differences between R0 and R1., Conclusions: It indicates that the radiomics study is rewarding for the aided diagnosis of R0 and R1. Texture features can potentially enhance physicians' diagnostic ability., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Bei Hui et al.)

Background and Objective: We aimed to compare the two new defined tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) systems in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging manual for overall survival (OS) analysis of G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (p-NECs) that are currently proposed for pancreatic exocrine adenocarcinomas (p-EACs) and G1/G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs), respectively., Methods: The data of patients who were surgically treated and histopathologically diagnosed with G3 p-NECs at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2002 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed and compared using the two new AJCC staging systems., Results: Applying the p-EAC AJCC 8th TNM staging system to G3 p-NECs, the estimated 3-year OSs for each stage were 86.7%, 76.0%, 44.5% and 20.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). According to the G1/G2 p-NETs staging system, the estimated OSs at 3 years for each new AJCC stage were 100.0%, 83.6%, 47.1% and 20.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). The system for p-EACs significantly discriminated the survival difference of G3 p-NECs between Stage I and Stage II (P = 0.019), while the other one for G1/G2 p-NETs could not (P = 0.108). The consistent results of Akaike information criteria with Harrell's concordance index indicated that the AJCC 8th staging system for p-EACs was superior when applied to G3 p-NECs for its better prognostic stratification and more accurate prediction ability for OS., Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrated that both TNM systems in the AJCC 8th staging manual were prognostic for patients with G3 p-NECs; however, the classification originally applied to p-EACs was superior and supported its use in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We aimed to validate the novel American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition staging manual for well-differentiated (G1/G2) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs)., Methods: Data of eligible patients were retrospectively collected, grouped, and analyzed by applying the new AJCC system., Results: According to the AJCC eighth staging manual for pNETs, 93, 66, 53, and 42 patients had stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively, with estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 96.9%, 92.8%, 48.4%, and 16.8% (P < 0.005), respectively. A total of 57, 28, 20, and 17 patients with G1 pNETs and 36, 38, 33, and 25 ones with G2 tumors were defined by the new AJCC system as having stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively. The estimated 5-year OS for stage I, II, III and IV disease was 100.0%, 97.1%, 52.5%, and 18.2%, respectively, for G1 pNETs (P < 0.005) and 94.2%, 90.3%, 38.7%, and 12.7%, respectively, for G2 tumors (P < 0.005). The novel AJCC classification, tumor grading, and radical resection were all prognostic predictors for OS in patients with pNETs., Conclusions: The new AJCC eighth staging system for well-differentiated pNETs was prognostic and might be adopted in clinical practice.

Background: Enucleation is increasingly used for pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) to preserve function of the pancreas. The data was limited due to rarity of this low-grade neoplasm. We sought to describe the indications, operative technique, short and long-term outcomes after enucleation with largest series of enucleated SPNs., Methods: Data collected retrospectively from 110 patients with SPN who underwent pancreatectomy between 2009 and 2016 in our institution were reviewed. Thirty-one patients underwent enucleation were identified for analysis, and compared with the 70 patients underwent conventional pancreatic resection., Results: Of the 31 patients, 27 (87.1%) were women, and the mean age was 29.8 years (range, 11-49 years). Enucleated SPNs were mostly located in the head/uncinate process of the pancreas (38.7%). Overall morbidity was 25.8%, mainly due to POPF (19.4%), and severe morbidity was only 6.5% with no death. Compared with conventional pancreatic resection, enucleation had a shorter duration of surgery (P < 0.001), less blood loss (P < 0.001), lower rate of exocrine insufficiency (P = 0.033) and comparable morbidity (P = 1), with no increased risk of tumor recurrence (P = 1). The rate of endocrine insufficiency after enucleation seemed lower (Nil vs. 4.5%, P = 0.55)., Conclusions: Enucleation of SPN of the pancreas appears to be feasible and safe for preserving exocrine and endocrine function of the gland. Enucleation with negative surgical margin seems adequate with no increased risk of tumor recurrence. Enucleation could be seriously considered as an alternative to conventional resection for this frequently young population., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Enucleation is increasingly used for benign or low-grade pancreatic neoplasms. Enucleation preserves the pancreatic parenchyma as well as decreases the risk of long-term endocrine and exocrine dysfunction, but may be associated with a higher rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The aim of this study was to assess short-term outcomes, in particular, POPF., Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from all 142 patients who underwent pancreatic enucleation between 2009 and 2014 in our institution were analyzed., Results: Lesions were most frequently located in the head and uncinate process of the pancreas (60.6%), and the most common types were neuroendocrine neoplasms (52.1%). Overall morbidity was 66%, mainly due to POPF (53.5%), and severe morbidity was only 8.4%, including one death (0.7%). Clinical POPF (Grade B or C) occurred in 22 patients (15.5%). Independent risk factors for clinical POPF were age ≥60 years, an episode of acute pancreatitis, and cystic morphology. Tumor size, coverage, histological differentiation, and prolonged operative time were not associated with the risk of POPF., Conclusions: Enucleation is a safe and feasible procedure for benign or low-grade pancreatic neoplasms. The rate of clinical POPF is acceptable, and clinical POPF occurs more frequently in elderly patients (≥60 years of age), patients with cystic neoplasms, or patients with an episode of acute pancreatitis., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The ability to stratify patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs) into prognostic groups has been hindered by the absence of a commonly accepted staging system. Both the 7th tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging guidelines by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the 2010 grading classifications by the World Health Organization (WHO) were validated to be unsatisfactory.We aim to evaluate the feasibility of combining the latest AJCC and WHO criteria to devise a novel tumor-grading-metastasis (TGM) staging system. We also sought to examine the stage-specific survival rates and the prognostic value of this new TGM system for p-NETs.Data of 120 patients with surgical resection and histopathological diagnosis of p-NETs from January 2004 to February 2014 in our institution were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Based on the AJCC and WHO criteria, we replaced the stage N0 and N1 with stage Ga (NET G1 and NET G2) and Gb (NET G3 and MANEC) respectively, without changes of the definition of T or M stage. The present novel TGM staging system was grouped as follows: stage I was defined as T1-2, Ga, M0; stage II as T3, Ga, M0 or as T1-3, Gb, M0; stage III as T4, Ga-b, M0 and stage IV as any T, M1.The new TGM staging system successfully distributed 55, 42, 12, and 11 eligible patients in stage I to IV, respectively. Differences of survival compared stage I with III and IV for patients with p-NETs were both statistically significant (P < 0.001), as well as those of stage II with III and IV (P < 0.001). Patients in stage I showed better a survival than those in stage II, whereas difference between stages III and IV was not notable (P = 0.001, P = 0.286, respectively). In multivariate models, when the TGM staging system was evaluated in place of the individual T, G, and M variables, this new criteria were proven to be an independent predictor of survival for surgically resected p-NETs (P < 0.05).Stratifying patients well, the current proposed TGM staging system was predictive for overall survival of p-NETs and could be more widely applied in clinical practice.

Objective: To analyze the viability of extended distal pancreatectomy and the associated prognostic factors., Methods: The data of 57 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent standard distal pancreatectomy(DP) or extended distal pancreatectomy(EDP) from January 2011 to December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-five patients were performed with DP and 22 with EDP. Operation safety and survival benefit between DP and EDP were compared by t-test or χ(2) test.Cox regression analysis was used to explore the prognostic indicators., Results: Compared to DP group, operation time((255±91)min vs.(208±80)min)(t=2.066, P=0.044) and ratio of blood transfusion (50.0% vs.17.1%)(χ(2)=12.836, P=0.008) were greater in EDP group, respectively.There were no significant differences in amount of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative duration of hospitalization. Delayed gastric emptying was greater in EDP(22.7% vs.2.9%)(Z=-2.251, P=0.027), while other complications had no differences. Mortality and ratio of relaparotomy also showed no differences. Median survival following DP was 13.1 months compared to 8.2 months following EDP. There was no difference in survival between DP and EDP. According to the results of multivariate analysis, tumor size(RR=1.275, P=0.03)and perioperative blood transfusions(RR=2.673, P=0.04) were independent prognostic factors., Conclusions: Though patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who undergo EDP have a worse pathologic staging, they will gain a comparable long-term survival to the patients undergo DP. Tumor size and perioperative blood transfusions are independent prognostic factors.

In 2010, World Health Organization (WHO) reclassified pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs) into 4 main groups: neuroendocrine tumor G1 (NET G1), neuroendocrine tumor G2 (NET G2), neuroendocrine carcinoma G3 (NEC G3), mixed adeno and neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC). Clinical value of these newly updated WHO grading criteria has not been rigorously validated. The authors aimed to evaluate the clinical consistency of the new 2010 grading classifications by WHO and the 2010 tumor-node metastasis staging systems by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) on survivals for patients with surgically resected p-NETs. Moreover, the authors would validate the prognostic value of both criteria for p-NETs.The authors retrospectively collected the clinicopathologic data of 120 eligible patients who were all surgically treated and histopathologically diagnosed as p-NETs from January 2004 to February 2014 in our single institution. The new WHO criteria were assigned to 4 stratified groups with a respective distribution of 62, 35, 17, and 6 patients. Patients with NET G1 or NET G2 obtained a statistically better survival compared with those with NEC G3 or MANEC (P < 0.001). Survivals of NET G1 was also better than those of NET G2 (P = 0.023), whereas difference of survivals between NEC G3 and MANEC present no obvious significance (P = 0.071). The AJCC 2010 staging systems were respectively defined in 61, 36, 12, and 11 patients for each stage. Differences of survivals of stage I with stage III and IV were significant (P < 0.001), as well as those of stage II with III and IV (P < 0.001); whereas comparisons of stage I with stage II and stage III with IV were not statistically significant (P = 0.129, P = 0.286; respectively). Together with radical resection, these 2 systems were both significant in univariate and multivariate analysis (P < 0.05).The newly updated WHO 2010 grading classifications and the AJCC 2010 staging systems could consistently reflect the clinical outcome of patients with surgically resected p-NETs. Meanwhile, both criteria could be independent predictors for survival analysis of p-NETs.

We aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics and compare the surgical outcome of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs) using the 2 tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) systems by both the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual (seventh edition) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS). Moreover, we sought to validate the prognostic value of the new AJCC criterion. Data of 145 consecutive patients who were all surgically treated and histologically diagnosed as p-NETs from January 2002 to June 2013 in our single institution were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for AJCC classifications of stages I, II, III, and IV were 79.5%, 63.1%, 15.0%, and NA, respectively, (P < 0.005). As for the ENETS system, the OS rates at 5 years for stages I, II, III, and IV were 75.5%, 72.7%, 29.0%, and NA, respectively, (P < 0.005). Both criteria present no statistically notable difference between stage I and stage II (P > 0.05) but between stage I and stages III and IV (P < 0.05), as well as those between stage II and stages III and IV (P < 0.05). Difference between stage III and IV by ENETS was significant (P = 0.031), whereas that by the AJCC was not (P = 0.144). What's more, the AJCC Staging Manual (seventh edition) was statistically significant in both uni- and multivariate analyses by Cox regression (P < 0.005 and P = 0.025, respectively). Our study indicated that the ENETS TNM staging system might be superior to the AJCC Staging Manual (seventh edition) for the clinical practice of p-NETs. Together with tumor grade and radical resection, the new AJCC system was also validated to be an independent predictor for p-NETs.

Background/aims: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a unique subgroup of tumors in the digestive system but with great clinical heterogeneity. The information on clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of Chinese patients is rather limited., Methodology: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features, prognostic factors of this disease in a consecutive cohort (N=294) between January 2007 and December 2012., Results: Functioning tumors accounted for 9.2%. Rectum was the most predominant GEP-NETs locations. Abdominal pain occurred in 46.5% patients which was the most common initial symptom. G1, G2 and G3 tumors accounted for 41.5%, 34.7% and 23.8%, respectively. Endoscopy provided the highest detection rate of 95.7%. Consistence between endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) and surgically obtained histological Ki-67 index was 36.4%. Serum CgA test showed a 80.0% consistence with the tissue biopsy. The median follow up duration was 2.8 years (0.02-5.90 years), the median survival was 4.8 years, overall 5-year survival rate was 69.6%. We found colonic localization, tumor size larger than 20 mm, G3 tumor and metastasis were associated with worse outcome (p<0.05)., Conclusion: We found both consistence and differences in GEP-NETs characteristics between our study and previous reports.

Background: No consensus exists as to whether laparoscopic treatment for pancreatic insulinomas (PIs) is safe and feasible. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the feasibility, safety, and potential benefits of laparoscopic approach (LA) for PIs. The abovementioned approach is also compared with open surgery., Methods: A systematic literature search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Science Citation Index, and Ovid journals) was performed to identify relevant articles. Articles that compare the use of LA and open approach to treat PI published on or before April 30, 2013, were included in the meta-analysis. The evaluated end points were operative outcomes, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications., Results: Seven observational clinical studies that recruited a total of 452 patients were included. The rates of conversion from LA to open surgery ranged from 0%-41.3%. The meta-analysis revealed that LA for PIs is associated with reduced length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference, -5.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.11 to -4.16; P < 0.00001). No significant difference was observed between LA and open surgery in terms of operation time (weighted mean difference, 2.57; 95% CI, -10.91 to 16.05; P = 0.71), postoperative mortality, overall morbidity (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35-1.17; P = 0.14], incidence of pancreatic fistula (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.51-1.44; P = 0.56), and recurrence of hyperglycemia (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.41-7.95; P = 0.43)., Conclusions: Laparoscopic treatment for PIs is a safe and feasible approach associated with reduction in length of hospital stay and comparable rates of postoperative complications in relation with open surgery., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the expressions of Bcl-2 and Beclin-1 in pancreatic cancer and analyze the correlation between them., Methods: The pancreatic tissue samples were collected from each 6 cases of pancreatic cancer, pancreatic exocrine benign tumor, chronic pancreatitis and normal pancreas and marked as group A, group B, group C and group D, respectively. The mRNA expression levels of Bcl-2 and Beclin-1 were detected by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR and the protein expression levels of Bcl-2 and Beclin-1 were detected through immunohistochemistry., Results: The expression levels of Bcl-2 mRNA and protein, were the lowest in group D and the highest in group A (P < 0.05). The expression levels of Beclin-1 mRNA and protein in group A were significantly lower than those in group B and group D (P < 0.05). However, the expression levels of Beclin-1 between group A and group C were not significantly different (P > 0.05). The correlation coefficient between Bcl-2 and Beclin-1 protein expression in pancreatic cancer is--0.827 (P = 0. 042)., Conclusion: Compared with normal pancreatic tissue, pancreatic cancer had Bcl-2 expression upregulated and Beclin-1 expression downregulated. The increased anti-apoptotic effect of Bcl-2 and the decreased autophagic effect of Beclin-1 may collaboratively contribute to the occurrence of pancreatic cancer.