Search

The likelihood of a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) often involves high-dimensional integrals, which in general cannot be computed explicitly. When direct computation is not available, method of simulated moments (MSM) is a fairly simpleway to estimate the parameters of interest. In this research, we compared parametric bootstrap (PB) and nonparametric bootstrapmethods (NPB) in estimating the standard errors of MSM estimators for GLMM. Simulation results show that when the group size is large, the PB and NPB perform similarly; when group size is medium, NPB performs better than PB in estimating standard errors of the mean. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For enhancing the quality and productivity, the use of process capability index (PCI) has become significant in statistical process control, designed to quantify the relation between the actual performance of the process and its specified requirements. Confidence interval is an important part of PCI because it is an estimated value and provides much more information about the population characteristic of interest than does a point estimate. In this article, bootstrap confidence intervals of non-normal PCI , is studied through simulation when the underlying distribution is exponential power distribution. Maximum likelihood method is used to estimate the parameters of the model. Four (parametric as well as non-parametric) bootstrap confidence intervals, namely standard bootstrap (s-boot), percentile bootstrap (p-boot), Student’s t bootstrap (t-boot), and bias-corrected percentile bootstrap (-boot), are considered for obtaining confidence intervals of . A Monte Carlo simulation has been used to investigate the estimated coverage probabilities and average widths of the bootstrap confidence intervals. Simulation results showed that among these (s-boot, p-boot, t-boot, and -boot) confidence intervals, the performances of the s-boot confidence intervals is the best in terms of overage probabilities. Finally, three real data-sets are analyzed for illustrative purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This work assumes that the small area quantities of interest follow a Fay–Herriot model with spatially correlated random area effects. Under this model, parametric and nonparametric bootstrap procedures are proposed for estimating the mean squared error of the empirical best linear unbiased predictor (EBLUP). A simulation study based on the Italian Agriculture Census 2000 compares bootstrap and analytical estimates of the MSE and studies their robustness to non-normality. Results indicate lower bias for the non-parametric bootstrap under specific departures from normality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]