Search

Since its introduction in the 1960s, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) has played a vital role in improving clinical outcomes for patients with acute and chronic illnesses. The evolution of TPN solutions and vascular access techniques, combined with an increased awareness and better understanding of the physiology of TPN, have improved the safety of this therapy. Nevertheless, complications are not uncommon and can be life threatening. This article provides an updated review on the metabolic and catheter complications associated with TPN.

This is a review article that discusses the trends in the use of enteral and parenteral nutrition support. Although enteral nutrition has existed longer than parenteral nutrition, only recent data would suggest a clinical benefit of enteral nutrition compared with parenteral nutrition. In this article, indications for parenteral nutrition are listed. Also, data comparing bacterial translocation and complications associated with both forms of nutritional support are discussed. Clinical outcome in specific gastrointestinal diseases is also discussed.

Objective: To analyze experience with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at our institution compared with reports in the literature., Patients and Methods: We reviewed medical records of 100 patients (53 men and 47 women) who underwent HSCT from 1992 to 2001. Data were abstracted on demographics, primary diagnosis, type of transplantation, myeloablative regimen, length of hospital stay, time to engraftment, 1- and 5-year survival, initiation and duration of TPN, and TPN-related complications., Results: Seventy-one transplantations were autologous, 27 allogeneic, and 2 syngeneic. The median age of the patients was 51 years (range, 19-71 years). We initiated TPN when patients' oral caloric intake was less than 50% of their estimated needs (4 to 7 days after the start of myeloablative therapy; median, 1.2 days after HSCT; range, 8 days before HSCT to 13 days after HSCT). We discontinued TPN when oral intake was more than 50% of estimated needs (median duration, 16 days for autologous and 24 days for allogeneic transplantations, with the shortest duration in breast cancer patients and the longest duration in those treated with cyclophosphamide). Mean weight loss was less than 2%. No differences in patient characteristics, myeloablative regimen, or diagnosis were observed between patients who required and those who did not require TPN. Infection, hospital stay, time to engraftment, and mortality were comparable to published reports., Conclusion: In patients undergoing HSCT, TPN should not be initiated until oral caloric intake is less than 50% of estimated needs. During the period of inadequate oral intake, TPN maintains stable body weight with longer duration of support needed for patients undergoing allogeneic than for those undergoing autologous transplantations.

Objective: To present the largest single institutional review of demographics, associated primary diseases, and survival of patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN)., Material and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of all Mayo Clinic patients treated with HPN between 1975 and 1995. The probability of survival was calculated by using Kaplan-Meier analysis., Results: In the 225 study patients requiring HPN (median age, 51 years), the main underlying primary diseases were as follows: inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (N = 50), nonterminal active cancer (N = 39), ischemic bowel (N = 35), radiation enteritis (N = 32), motility disorder (chronic pseudo-obstruction) (N = 26), and adhesive intestinal obstruction (N = 18). Other conditions included intestinal and pancreatic fistula, refractory sprue, dumping syndrome, and protein-losing enteropathy. The overall probability of 5-year survival during HPN was 60%. The probability of survival at 5 years based on the primary disease was 92% for IBD, 60% for ischemic bowel, 54% for radiation enteritis, 48% for motility disorder, and 38% for cancer. The probability of 5-year survival stratified by age at initiation of HPN was as follows: younger than 40 years, 80%; 40 through 60 years, 62%; and older than 60 years, 30%. Most deaths during therapy with HPN were attributable to the primary disease. Among the 20 patients who died of an HPN-related cause, 11 deaths were from catheter sepsis, 4 from liver failure, 2 from venous thrombosis, and 2 from metabolic abnormalities., Conclusion: Survival of HPN-treated patients is best predicted on the basis of the primary disease and the age at initiation of HPN. Patients with IBD and age younger than 40 years have a better 5-year survival in comparison with other groups. Most deaths during treatment with HPN are a result of the primary disease; HPN-related deaths are uncommon.