Search

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to disrupt the lives of families and may have implications for children with existing sleep problems. As such, we aimed to: (1) characterize sleep changes during the COVID-19 pandemic in children who had previously been identified as having sleep problems, (2) identify factors contributing to sleep changes due to COVID-19 safety measures, and (3) understand parents' and children's needs to support sleep during the pandemic.Methods: Eighty-five Canadian parents with children aged 4-14 years participated in this explanatory sequential, mixed-methods study using an online survey of children's and parents' sleep, with a subset of 16 parents, selected based on changes in their children's sleep, participating in semi-structured interviews. Families had previously participated in the Better Nights, Better Days (BNBD) randomized controlled trial.Results: While some parents perceived their child's sleep quality improved during the COVID-19 pandemic (14.1%, n = 12), many parents perceived their child's sleep had worsened (40.0%, n = 34). Parents attributed children's worsened sleep to increased screen time, anxiety, and decreased exercise. Findings from semi-structured interviews highlighted the effect of disrupted routines on sleep and stress, and that stress reciprocally influenced children's and parents' sleep.Conclusions: The sleep of many Canadian children was affected by the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the disruption of routines influencing children's sleep. eHealth interventions, such as BNBD with modifications that address the COVID-19 context, could help families address these challenges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate patient engagement processes in the development of a new health coaching intervention for parents of children with suspected developmental delays. Method: A cross‐sectional mixed‐method study design was used. Researchers (n=18) and patient‐partners (n=9) were surveyed using the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) in areas of: (1) communication/supports for participation; (2) sharing views/perspectives; (3) impacts/influence of engagement initiative; and (4) final thoughts/satisfaction. Descriptive statistics and an inductive thematic‐based approach were used to analyse the data. Results: For both study groups, high agreement, with responses largely ranging between 'agree' to 'strongly agree', was noted on all four sections of the PPEET. Qualitative reports reflected that patient engagement was important, meaningful, and had a significant impact on the quality of the project and on the professional development of researchers in their understanding and use of patient‐oriented methodology. Patient‐partners noted challenges related to having realistic deadlines in providing feedback and a lack of a broader range of representation among members. Interpretation: The benefits and challenges of applying patient‐oriented strategies to a multicentre trial were highlighted. These will be used to enhance our engagement processes. This article is commented on by Rethorn on page 631 of this issue. Editor's Choice The current COVID‐19 pandemic has placed a disproportionate additional burden on children with disabilities and their family.1 This experience has also highlighted the crucial role of parents in delivering intervention,2 the value of coaching,3 as well as the importance of quality online resources to that effect.4 My Editor's Choice for the June issue focuses on engagement of expert partners with lived experience in developing an online coaching intervention for caregivers children with a suspected developmental problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In 2000, Manitoba began utilizing telehealth services for the assessment, diagnosis and follow-up of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs). Since that time, the use of telehealth in Manitoba has expanded to the delivery of education and support to families caring for children with FASD in rural and remote areas of the province. The purpose of this study was to expand on a previous evaluation through a focus on the participant experience. Our objectives were thus to explore the experience of families with the telehealth process and to examine the use of telehealth in diagnostic assessment as well as follow-up post-clinical assessment. Materials and Methods: Sixteen semistructured interviews were conducted with families who had participated in at least one diagnostic assessment and/or individual or group follow-up via telehealth offered through the Manitoba FASD Centre. Results: The majority of participants reported being happy with their experience(s) using telehealth for assessment, diagnosis, and/or follow-up support. Two general themes emerged from the data. The first theme is focused on the value of telehealth use for families with children living with FASD, whereas the second theme presents various needs of this client group. Conclusions: This study provides support for the use of telehealth as an effective technology beyond diagnosis for individuals with FASD and their families. Families support the utilization of this technology and, despite its minor shortcomings, appreciate the flexibility of telehealth, which allows them to remain in their home communities, connected to their families and support systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/aims: Insomnia is highly prevalent in children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), yet little research exists on sleep treatment access, utilization, and provision in this population. This study explores barriers and facilitators to access, use, and provision of treatment for sleep problems as experienced by parents of children with NDDs, including Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Cerebral Palsy (CP) and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD), and health care professionals who work with children with these conditions.Method: Transcripts from online focus groups and interviews, conducted separately with parents of children with NDDs (n = 43) and health care professionals (n = 44), were qualitatively analyzed using content analysis for key themes.Results: Barriers included limited access to/availability of treatment, lack of knowledge/training, NDD-specific factors (e.g., symptoms, medications, and comorbidities), parent factors (e.g., capacity to implement treatment, exhaustion), and the challenging, intensive nature of sleep treatment. Facilitators included positive beliefs and attitudes, education, support, and ability to modify treatments for NDD symptoms. Barriers and facilitators were similar across all four NDDs.Conclusions: Results highlight a need for more education about sleep in NDDs and to develop accessible interventions, as well as the potential of a transdiagnostic approach to sleep treatment in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]