1. Impact of co-resident health and living alone on risk of hospital admission for people with Parkinson's disease.
- Author
-
Brack C, Tenison E, Henderson E, Makin S, and Ben-Shlomo Y
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Health Status, Multimorbidity, Adult, Parkinson Disease epidemiology, Parkinson Disease therapy, Hospitalization statistics & numerical data, Caregivers statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Background: People with Parkinson's Disease (PwP) have a higher rate of hospitalisation compared to the general population. Little is known about the impact of having a co-resident and their health on hospitalisation rates of PwP., Methods: We utilised Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD data (2010-2015) to identify PwP and co-residents. We classed either the fittest or youngest adult as the primary caregiver in each household. Caregiver health was classified by the Cambridge Multimorbidity Score (CMS), primary care utilisation and prescriptions. We calculated the hospitalisation (elective, emergency) incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for PwP who lived alone compared to those with a caregiver using negative binomial regression, and whether worse caregiver health predicted higher risk of admissions., Results: We identified 3254 PwP and 4007 family members. PwP who lived alone were less likely to have an elective admission (0.79; 95 % CI 0.69-0.91) and more likely to have an emergency admission (1.40; 95 % CI 1.70-1.54). Worse caregiver health, as measured by the CMS, was associated with an increased risk of emergency admission (IRR 1.35; 95 % CI 1.17-1.57), but this attenuated and was consistent with chance in the fully adjusted model (1.04; 95 % CI 0.95-1.13). No strong associations were seen between caregiver health and elective admissions., Conclusion: PwP who live alone are at increased risk of emergency and less likely to have elective hospital admissions. It is important that health care providers support such people and ensure they receive equitable access to the potential benefits of elective procedures., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Emily Henderson reports financial support was provided by Gatsby Charitable Foundation. Yoav Ben-Shlomo reports financial support was provided by Parkinson's UK. Yoav Ben-Shlomo reports financial support was provided by Royal Osteoporosis Society. Yoav Ben-Shlomo reports financial support was provided by UKRIMedical Research Council. Yoav Ben-Shlomo reports financial support was provided by Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership. Yoav Ben-Shlomo reports financial support was provided by John Templeton Foundation. Yoav Ben-Shlomo reports financial support was provided by Wellcome Trust. YBS has received consultancy payment from Human Centric DD LTD and Parkinson's UK both of which are unrelated to this piece of research. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Emma Tenison reports financial support was provided by Gatsby Charitable Foundation. Emma Tenison reports a relationship with Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust that includes: employment. Emma Tenison reports a relationship with The Neurology Academy that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Emma Tenison reports a relationship with University of Bristol that includes: employment. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF